sHrUc1qt

1WARNING: Logging before flag parsing goes to stderr.
2W0826 22:17:26.098241 140332705064832 deprecation_wrapper.py:119] From /content/grover/lm/optimization_adafactor.py:88: The name tf.train.Optimizer is deprecated. Please use tf.compat.v1.train.Optimizer instead.
3
4W0826 22:17:26.217010 140332705064832 deprecation_wrapper.py:119] From /content/grover/lm/modeling.py:87: The name tf.gfile.GFile is deprecated. Please use tf.io.gfile.GFile instead.
5
6
7~~
8batch size=1, max batch size=3, num chunks=1, batch size per chunk=1
9~~
10
11W0826 22:17:26.218913 140332705064832 deprecation_wrapper.py:119] From sample/contextual_generate_cli_multiline.py:121: The name tf.ConfigProto is deprecated. Please use tf.compat.v1.ConfigProto instead.
12
13W0826 22:17:26.219188 140332705064832 deprecation_wrapper.py:119] From sample/contextual_generate_cli_multiline.py:123: The name tf.Session is deprecated. Please use tf.compat.v1.Session instead.
14
152019-08-26 22:17:26.235098: I tensorflow/core/platform/profile_utils/cpu_utils.cc:94] CPU Frequency: 2200000000 Hz
162019-08-26 22:17:26.235386: I tensorflow/compiler/xla/service/service.cc:168] XLA service 0x179f480 executing computations on platform Host. Devices:
172019-08-26 22:17:26.235431: I tensorflow/compiler/xla/service/service.cc:175]   StreamExecutor device (0): <undefined>, <undefined>
182019-08-26 22:17:26.249094: I tensorflow/stream_executor/platform/default/dso_loader.cc:42] Successfully opened dynamic library libcuda.so.1
192019-08-26 22:17:26.422866: I tensorflow/stream_executor/cuda/cuda_gpu_executor.cc:1005] successful NUMA node read from SysFS had negative value (-1), but there must be at least one NUMA node, so returning NUMA node zero
202019-08-26 22:17:26.423601: I tensorflow/compiler/xla/service/service.cc:168] XLA service 0x179fd40 executing computations on platform CUDA. Devices:
212019-08-26 22:17:26.423626: I tensorflow/compiler/xla/service/service.cc:175]   StreamExecutor device (0): Tesla T4, Compute Capability 7.5
222019-08-26 22:17:26.423820: I tensorflow/stream_executor/cuda/cuda_gpu_executor.cc:1005] successful NUMA node read from SysFS had negative value (-1), but there must be at least one NUMA node, so returning NUMA node zero
232019-08-26 22:17:26.424336: I tensorflow/core/common_runtime/gpu/gpu_device.cc:1640] Found device 0 with properties: 
24name: Tesla T4 major: 7 minor: 5 memoryClockRate(GHz): 1.59
25pciBusID: 0000:00:04.0
262019-08-26 22:17:26.427549: I tensorflow/stream_executor/platform/default/dso_loader.cc:42] Successfully opened dynamic library libcudart.so.10.0
272019-08-26 22:17:26.429275: I tensorflow/stream_executor/platform/default/dso_loader.cc:42] Successfully opened dynamic library libcublas.so.10.0
282019-08-26 22:17:26.433522: I tensorflow/stream_executor/platform/default/dso_loader.cc:42] Successfully opened dynamic library libcufft.so.10.0
292019-08-26 22:17:26.444612: I tensorflow/stream_executor/platform/default/dso_loader.cc:42] Successfully opened dynamic library libcurand.so.10.0
302019-08-26 22:17:26.453275: I tensorflow/stream_executor/platform/default/dso_loader.cc:42] Successfully opened dynamic library libcusolver.so.10.0
312019-08-26 22:17:26.459517: I tensorflow/stream_executor/platform/default/dso_loader.cc:42] Successfully opened dynamic library libcusparse.so.10.0
322019-08-26 22:17:26.475707: I tensorflow/stream_executor/platform/default/dso_loader.cc:42] Successfully opened dynamic library libcudnn.so.7
332019-08-26 22:17:26.475834: I tensorflow/stream_executor/cuda/cuda_gpu_executor.cc:1005] successful NUMA node read from SysFS had negative value (-1), but there must be at least one NUMA node, so returning NUMA node zero
342019-08-26 22:17:26.476446: I tensorflow/stream_executor/cuda/cuda_gpu_executor.cc:1005] successful NUMA node read from SysFS had negative value (-1), but there must be at least one NUMA node, so returning NUMA node zero
352019-08-26 22:17:26.477239: I tensorflow/core/common_runtime/gpu/gpu_device.cc:1763] Adding visible gpu devices: 0
362019-08-26 22:17:26.477314: I tensorflow/stream_executor/platform/default/dso_loader.cc:42] Successfully opened dynamic library libcudart.so.10.0
372019-08-26 22:17:26.478269: I tensorflow/core/common_runtime/gpu/gpu_device.cc:1181] Device interconnect StreamExecutor with strength 1 edge matrix:
382019-08-26 22:17:26.478293: I tensorflow/core/common_runtime/gpu/gpu_device.cc:1187]      0 
392019-08-26 22:17:26.478302: I tensorflow/core/common_runtime/gpu/gpu_device.cc:1200] 0:   N 
402019-08-26 22:17:26.478399: I tensorflow/stream_executor/cuda/cuda_gpu_executor.cc:1005] successful NUMA node read from SysFS had negative value (-1), but there must be at least one NUMA node, so returning NUMA node zero
412019-08-26 22:17:26.478921: I tensorflow/stream_executor/cuda/cuda_gpu_executor.cc:1005] successful NUMA node read from SysFS had negative value (-1), but there must be at least one NUMA node, so returning NUMA node zero
422019-08-26 22:17:26.479394: W tensorflow/core/common_runtime/gpu/gpu_bfc_allocator.cc:40] Overriding allow_growth setting because the TF_FORCE_GPU_ALLOW_GROWTH environment variable is set. Original config value was 0.
432019-08-26 22:17:26.479438: I tensorflow/core/common_runtime/gpu/gpu_device.cc:1326] Created TensorFlow device (/job:localhost/replica:0/task:0/device:GPU:0 with 14221 MB memory) -> physical GPU (device: 0, name: Tesla T4, pci bus id: 0000:00:04.0, compute capability: 7.5)
44W0826 22:17:26.480574 140332705064832 deprecation_wrapper.py:119] From sample/contextual_generate_cli_multiline.py:124: The name tf.placeholder is deprecated. Please use tf.compat.v1.placeholder instead.
45
46W0826 22:17:26.518331 140332705064832 deprecation_wrapper.py:119] From /content/grover/lm/modeling.py:725: The name tf.AUTO_REUSE is deprecated. Please use tf.compat.v1.AUTO_REUSE instead.
47
48W0826 22:17:26.527010 140332705064832 deprecation_wrapper.py:119] From /content/grover/lm/modeling.py:490: The name tf.variable_scope is deprecated. Please use tf.compat.v1.variable_scope instead.
49
50W0826 22:17:26.590718 140332705064832 deprecation.py:323] From /content/grover/lm/modeling.py:143: dense (from tensorflow.python.layers.core) is deprecated and will be removed in a future version.
51Instructions for updating:
52Use keras.layers.dense instead.
53W0826 22:17:33.993520 140332705064832 deprecation.py:323] From /usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/util/dispatch.py:180: batch_gather (from tensorflow.python.ops.array_ops) is deprecated and will be removed after 2017-10-25.
54Instructions for updating:
55`tf.batch_gather` is deprecated, please use `tf.gather` with `batch_dims` instead.
56W0826 22:17:38.055484 140332705064832 deprecation_wrapper.py:119] From sample/contextual_generate_cli_multiline.py:131: The name tf.train.Saver is deprecated. Please use tf.compat.v1.train.Saver instead.
57
58W0826 22:17:38.572521 140332705064832 deprecation.py:323] From /usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow/python/training/saver.py:1276: checkpoint_exists (from tensorflow.python.training.checkpoint_management) is deprecated and will be removed in a future version.
59Instructions for updating:
60Use standard file APIs to check for files with this prefix.
61Loaded model.
62Sample, 1  of  15
632019-08-26 22:18:21.805216: I tensorflow/stream_executor/platform/default/dso_loader.cc:42] Successfully opened dynamic library libcublas.so.10.0
64I'll speak as an ML and I'll speak frankly. This whole "you haven't developed the right theory" crap. It gets old very quickly, its just clout-chasing from my perspective and you're convincing people merely ridiculing. "Anti-Intellectualism" being a trait among anarchists?, I know anarchists and former anarchists where this "definitive trait" is inapplicable, Clap Clap so you've made it through chapter one of Kapital and read a few dozen books, I know literal brainlets that got through Kaptial, people need to stop acting like reading is a fucking feat. Its really condescending, "You won't subscribe to my ideas, you don't really know how the world works so" WoKe As FuCk. At the end of the day what do you know about what I know?, or my experiences or how I view the world. People that speak like this regardless of who they are just ignorant, a couple of "Anti-intellectual" works would be "Mutual-Aid" and "The great French revolution" by Kropotkin, they're "anti-intellectual" apparently, they're well researched. The actual Anti-intellectuals are full blown conservatives that won't question current science or history or reality in general or make no of analysis social practice, "Trans people are people", "oh no they're this or that", the individual is separated from it, they're something else. "The free market can give magical handjobs, its beyond our investigation why this happens we're not complaining"(Things that people make and bring to market, suddenly become something beyond our comprehension, capitalists just accumulate a lot of things for whatever reason and whatever it is, they deserve it) Capitalism views society as an Eroded structure, like shit that's natural has become gross with chemicals, mass neurosis and as we all know is taking lives. It's a predictable hate, and wouldn't like it if anything has happened to ruin the world but capitalism just wants more power and profits to justify it.
65
66If you think it's true then I bet you would push an oppressed society to fight back against it
67
68SHAME!!!<|endoftext|>Tobacco is one of the most widely used illegal substances, with about 12% of all countries using it. Traditionally, cigarettes are manufactured, smoked, and sold with a pack per pack of cigarettes. In fact, consuming one pack of cigarettes per day is about the same as drinking one beer or drinking one drink per day.
69
70Although tobacco smoking is a particular problem for individual smokers and affects their bodies, this problem also affects those who smoke and those who work near them.
71
72Effects of tobacco on people
73
74Tobacco smoking is an extremely harmful way to die. Several aspects contribute to the harm, the most common of which is tobacco damage to the smoker's health. Since smoke filters are unable to completely eliminate the nicotine from the smoke, which causes cancer and respiratory tract infections, studies also link smoking to dental decay, lung diseases such as emphysema, cardiovascular disease (especially heart attack), and other lung diseases.
75
76Despite these damages, smokers cannot know exactly what they will get from a particular cigarette or if it contains any contaminants. As a result, some people continue to smoke their cigarettes, and others begin smoking cigarettes when their friends quit smoking.
77
78Studies by the American Cancer Society that tested 2538 cigarette smokers showed that even those who smoked fewer than 10 cigarettes per day were at risk for more than 40 different illnesses caused by smoking tobacco cigarettes, including cancer.
79
80Effects of tobacco on employees
81
82There are also numerous health effects caused by tobacco smoking. The former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan recently said that the health effects of smoking were a form of crime. He also said, "And when people start smoking and develop diseases such as cancer, a laryngeal tumor, for example, or a heart ailment, it is a tragedy that nobody is prosecuted."
83
84Health issues related to exposure to the toxins of tobacco smoke are often in the news because of the huge number of people who die from smoking cigarettes. Deaths due to tobacco-related diseases affect the wellbeing of the human beings that were exposed to the smoke.
85
86Effects of tobacco on children
87
88The effects of tobacco on children are too many to add them up to the ones previously mentioned. There are certain diseases caused by tobacco that have so far been relatively neglected or little documented. Some of these diseases are respiratory infections, obesity, and ear, nose, and throat conditions.
89
90Tobacco is a public health issue and adults who smoke are responsible for the illness of everyone. People should be more aware that smoking is a public health issue, which is a problem of their own making.
91
92Note: Tobacco is classified into two types, namely, nornate and non-nornate. It is the latter that the court decision will consider.<|endoftext|>Energy storage is able to store electrical energy that has
93Sample, 2  of  15
94I'll speak as an ML and I'll speak frankly. This whole "you haven't developed the right theory" crap. It gets old very quickly, its just clout-chasing from my perspective and you're convincing people merely ridiculing. "Anti-Intellectualism" being a trait among anarchists?, I know anarchists and former anarchists where this "definitive trait" is inapplicable, Clap Clap so you've made it through chapter one of Kapital and read a few dozen books, I know literal brainlets that got through Kaptial, people need to stop acting like reading is a fucking feat. Its really condescending, "You won't subscribe to my ideas, you don't really know how the world works so" WoKe As FuCk. At the end of the day what do you know about what I know?, or my experiences or how I view the world. People that speak like this regardless of who they are just ignorant, a couple of "Anti-intellectual" works would be "Mutual-Aid" and "The great French revolution" by Kropotkin, they're "anti-intellectual" apparently, they're well researched. The actual Anti-intellectuals are full blown conservatives that won't question current science or history or reality in general or make no of analysis social practice, "Trans people are people", "oh no they're this or that", the individual is separated from it, they're something else. "The free market can give magical handjobs, its beyond our investigation why this happens we're not complaining"(Things that people make and bring to market, suddenly become something beyond our comprehension, capitalists just accumulate a lot of things for whatever reason and whatever it is, they deserve it)
95
96
97
98I don't know anything about James or his previous work, but I have heard nothing about this, except a collection of shitty Youtube videos whose influence can be laughed at. "Anti-intellectualism" is a phrase that has nothing to do with any of this and people keep bringing up "How the foundations of modern capitalism have been exposed". No serious studies have been done, the conservative theory really is one sided with the money giving leads everything, but was really just Flanders (It should be made clear here, I dislike right wingers and am not in favor of "anarcho-capitalism" but am for decentralizing the power as to not confluence in an ubermensch elite taking over the world, capitalism is anathema to this as "Capitalism" is at its core an endo-patriarchal movement, but from the bottom up) that the masses owe him, as he was just the "chosen one" for the job. Any real knowledge is what we really need, we need serious research, its important what Marx did, he really investigated working class and peasant relations, but we don't have the right people, or masses here to take this work of necessity into their own hands or see we really need it. Until they see that they really do need to start thinking outside of the box we already throw them in and that capitalism can really not go on and that reality is reality and its here to stay, until they can see that there is another alternative, then we don't really have the right people to run anything else. We are stuck in the capitalist economy because its the only economy. Flanders and the conservatives give us something that isn't really much in a lot of ways (Rand's "materialism") I see no argument, we need to be honest about ourselves with ourselves, we can't see that a lot of our own arguments are insincere, whatever we see of Flanders is really completely debatable now, now that he's long gone and we can compare it against others.
99
100
101
102I don't know what James does, but until we honestly talk about this, people that believe things based on writings from 1839, we are not a population any more than the Greek Philosophers that sat and theorized in the Athens Aristotle Temple on the one side, and slave-based city of Sparta on the other side (In fact I think we can go back farther and find the Romans emperors at the Capitol, so "aura" goes back further too) That whole "we need to be objective about the situation" that is "an 'anti-intellectual' position" as I've said is absurd in a democratic environment because we as a majority don't need to be objective in any of this. The fear of looking outside ourselves, political and economic points of view is that people will look outside and see the inherent horrible things that capitalism is capable of, that most people have no idea of these things and that "the greatest enemy of the people" as Marx stated, is our "intellectual masturbation" or a better way to describe it, what we rely on and are programmed to think is right for us. What we call "Anarcho-Capitalism" or some new term like
103Sample, 3  of  15
104I'll speak as an ML and I'll speak frankly. This whole "you haven't developed the right theory" crap. It gets old very quickly, its just clout-chasing from my perspective and you're convincing people merely ridiculing. "Anti-Intellectualism" being a trait among anarchists?, I know anarchists and former anarchists where this "definitive trait" is inapplicable, Clap Clap so you've made it through chapter one of Kapital and read a few dozen books, I know literal brainlets that got through Kaptial, people need to stop acting like reading is a fucking feat. Its really condescending, "You won't subscribe to my ideas, you don't really know how the world works so" WoKe As FuCk. At the end of the day what do you know about what I know?, or my experiences or how I view the world. People that speak like this regardless of who they are just ignorant, a couple of "Anti-intellectual" works would be "Mutual-Aid" and "The great French revolution" by Kropotkin, they're "anti-intellectual" apparently, they're well researched. The actual Anti-intellectuals are full blown conservatives that won't question current science or history or reality in general or make no of analysis social practice, "Trans people are people", "oh no they're this or that", the individual is separated from it, they're something else. "The free market can give magical handjobs, its beyond our investigation why this happens we're not complaining"(Things that people make and bring to market, suddenly become something beyond our comprehension, capitalists just accumulate a lot of things for whatever reason and whatever it is, they deserve it) "Controversy sells, it's not going to break our necks before we introduce and sell our ideas to market (tomorrow). Get the fuck over it if your tired of having angry after seeing people read" Yeah I'm tired of you "Oh it was because I wasn't earning some kind of status, there is nothing inherently wrong with politics and academia", I'm not arguing that, I'm arguing (as a truth based ideological method of inquiry) that one ought to learn what the other's original program(s) is like rather than just regurgitate a bunch of well researched analysis. I know what "increasing my relevance and career" is, you're asking me to ignore what Marxism means(what I'm studying), that's not reasonable I say, that ain't gonna happen... its a liberal bullshit, you have learned enough material to read the 1st (now 2nd) book on it, you're doing great dang to read them, we'll never debate how things work or how they effect humans; we'll talk about what can be done and we'll argue between the lines (not the paragraphs); if you don't disagree with them when you have that academic license of knowledge, fuck off, you're not part of the dialogue, read a book. The problem that I think there is is, the smarter you are, the more you identify how the world is/they are. We'll never stop (if we wanted to) in our quest to make sure that we don't get tricked into putting ourselves "in" that war. A lot of people that I know are really smart and can't help but read books on it (just look at the percentages of middle school and high school grads) I think sometimes we're not generally realistic about how the system is, but that's why we try to do something as an organization to try to eliminate that from our everyday lives and the world in general. "If you're not an immigrant you can't know what an immigrant is", something not fair of me, but we're trying to make sure that you don't come in and tell us what to think, its a tension, we understand this, I recognize that. "We were always ill informed, with our ideas, but now is the time to become knowledgeable about economics", am I not exactly an activist just because I can't claim to be one? I'm well educated, I keep learning I admit to doing so, I'm not that stupid that I can't read some science fiction about how the world works to see how the shit might play out(with a progressive political agenda), it's not because I can't do math (ok so whatever, I suck at it, physics is pretty easy for me to comprehend) It's because I don't think that both sides are being reasonable(. I don't think I'm being reasonable, and think I'm also pretty fucking intelligent and have that, Im guessing you can say I'm a dipshit because I don't hold any noble ideals against you for not 'being' somebody you believe in, which would be a pretty damn arrogant thing to do, *sarcasm*, but hey, that's your opinion and you can believe it, its something I'll allow. But really, it's just facts
105Sample, 4  of  15
106I'll speak as an ML and I'll speak frankly. This whole "you haven't developed the right theory" crap. It gets old very quickly, its just clout-chasing from my perspective and you're convincing people merely ridiculing. "Anti-Intellectualism" being a trait among anarchists?, I know anarchists and former anarchists where this "definitive trait" is inapplicable, Clap Clap so you've made it through chapter one of Kapital and read a few dozen books, I know literal brainlets that got through Kaptial, people need to stop acting like reading is a fucking feat. Its really condescending, "You won't subscribe to my ideas, you don't really know how the world works so" WoKe As FuCk. At the end of the day what do you know about what I know?, or my experiences or how I view the world. People that speak like this regardless of who they are just ignorant, a couple of "Anti-intellectual" works would be "Mutual-Aid" and "The great French revolution" by Kropotkin, they're "anti-intellectual" apparently, they're well researched. The actual Anti-intellectuals are full blown conservatives that won't question current science or history or reality in general or make no of analysis social practice, "Trans people are people", "oh no they're this or that", the individual is separated from it, they're something else. "The free market can give magical handjobs, its beyond our investigation why this happens we're not complaining"(Things that people make and bring to market, suddenly become something beyond our comprehension, capitalists just accumulate a lot of things for whatever reason and whatever it is, they deserve it)
107
108First, just what is Anti-intellectual? You can call a book fucking stupid as well as annoying as fuck, should I call that intellectual? I'm assuming you're taking that as an insult or you're an idiot. Why are you here? I’m assuming you’re here to say my ideas are stupid and that they’re not developing because at a point, maybe i should have said that you were an idiot or informed.
109
110
111
112Second, it gets old fast, but I read. I've read a shit ton of books. I've read "Mutual Aid" over 200 times. I've read "The Great French Revolution" over 600 times. I've read "Civilization and its Discontents" several times over. I've read a half-dozen books on anarchism, "The State" by James Burnham was a big influence. I've read people of varying political opinions, philosophers, demographers, thermometers, geologists, scientists, poets, filmmakers, poets, poets, philosophers, novelists, historians, linguists, and educators.
113
114
115
116There's more books I'm not even going to mention... Hundreds, thousands of them. If you don't read books, you'll be stupid. Period. You're wrong about that to a degree, but as far as the ignorance and all that stuff... My first interests as a child were reading and improving my education.
117
118
119
120Third, you should be aware of more than one aspect to philosophy, especilly historical and philosophical. Those arguments in particular are intrinsic to them as opposition. By "Education", you're implying I couldn't become an educated person... Confusing education with lack of knowledge is an illusion. I could have become educated, may be in a completely different culture. Personally I preferred studying history. Also what do you know about history? I could teach you "civilization and its decline", everyone has an opinion on it and no one has an idea what was probably going on at the time it was occurring, there could be as many theories as theories on history as on which burger King sandwich is best, lets leave that up to someone that has done some work to figure that out.
121
122
123
124Fourth, as Anarchism develops and expands, so does Anarchism. If it is anti-intellectual and you're saying that I should reject it as being false and because I don't want to learn it all, that's alright, but people should have that freedom.
125
126
127
128Fifth, other anarchists are like me. I don't try to come up with an ideology, I can't, I don't have the power to do that. So instead I use my critical thinking skills. People like Kropotkin wanted to see a society of free people that had minimal to no authoritarian relationship with the state or other hierarchical power structures, his theory doesn't encompass all other Anarchists ideas which are more specific, but there are still some things that are universal. Whether its Anarchism or Communism or -kapitalism- I am just convinced that we live in a world that appears to it wanting to do something better, even when it comes to people. There are limits and I don't feel like any modern revolutions have accomplished
129Sample, 5  of  15
130I'll speak as an ML and I'll speak frankly. This whole "you haven't developed the right theory" crap. It gets old very quickly, its just clout-chasing from my perspective and you're convincing people merely ridiculing. "Anti-Intellectualism" being a trait among anarchists?, I know anarchists and former anarchists where this "definitive trait" is inapplicable, Clap Clap so you've made it through chapter one of Kapital and read a few dozen books, I know literal brainlets that got through Kaptial, people need to stop acting like reading is a fucking feat. Its really condescending, "You won't subscribe to my ideas, you don't really know how the world works so" WoKe As FuCk. At the end of the day what do you know about what I know?, or my experiences or how I view the world. People that speak like this regardless of who they are just ignorant, a couple of "Anti-intellectual" works would be "Mutual-Aid" and "The great French revolution" by Kropotkin, they're "anti-intellectual" apparently, they're well researched. The actual Anti-intellectuals are full blown conservatives that won't question current science or history or reality in general or make no of analysis social practice, "Trans people are people", "oh no they're this or that", the individual is separated from it, they're something else. "The free market can give magical handjobs, its beyond our investigation why this happens we're not complaining"(Things that people make and bring to market, suddenly become something beyond our comprehension, capitalists just accumulate a lot of things for whatever reason and whatever it is, they deserve it) If you really want to make those objections, you have to actually ask why this shit happens and how it's true, why your auto will not work or why the money laundering is happening. Sounds like you don't actually know enough about the problem of the world nor yourself to approach it logically. A minor typo in one paragraph that happens to fit your argument, but not in general, what more do you want? Of course you'll invoke the fuck out of the people with all the relevant information and cultural production. 1. What is MLMism? MLMISM is a political theory/system that defines global economic relations based on the values of profit/ownership. MLMism is rooted in traditional understandings of the social relations in capitalism and the ideologues of this Marxist ideology espouse various benefits that come with this worldview. Besides the fancy words for their ideology, these MLM ideologues have an expansive and interconnected body of theories that ultimately, MLMism is no different. The most extreme interpretations of MLMism would insist that every behavior is an interaction of capitalist and worker (corporations, government etc), then why this class system? Its pretty hard to accept (and this stance is the consensus among students of the existing regimes, its easy to say it's just masking socialization and/or "managed economies") that a "pure" capitalist is the perfect complement to pure ownership (good times, rampant exploitation), what if the capitalist or possessor doesn't agree to such a system? Due to the fact that there are people involved in MLMism and anarchism, the use of terms like "anti-intellectualism" is not used lightly, if someone is critical of those who argue for these "perfect matches" why would they be the target of such criticism, would they have criticized Marx or Marxists? I'm completely convinced they say it out of chauvinism for the system to start this kind of discussion, the system either works great or not, its not your "ideology" to say which is better for everybody. What is ignorant? Picking things up and reading just because they're complicated, the greatest political or academic thinkers were not people that necessarily read this much, they were people who acted like people, had opinions, spoke with confidence and explored ideas to understand the world on their own. Why the need to call people ignorant? If you think science doesn't matter anymore or you don't know how science is done, you've got to read up about it or study something to gain an opinion on how science works. Information about the world is omnipresent whether you accept this or not, It's so easy to research or search for it, what's the problem? You don't have to believe anything, just look up and read. On the other hand, MLM ideologues argue that anti-intellectualism is a virtue, it is not, in fact, ignorance. The problem is that its also just a great political ideology, so it's not only ignorance, its an attitude to what in question are, well you, and how you view the world. I've read some posts saying "you can't have it both ways", every theory is either subject to criticism or accepted but, that doesn't mean its incorrect, it
131Sample, 6  of  15
132I'll speak as an ML and I'll speak frankly. This whole "you haven't developed the right theory" crap. It gets old very quickly, its just clout-chasing from my perspective and you're convincing people merely ridiculing. "Anti-Intellectualism" being a trait among anarchists?, I know anarchists and former anarchists where this "definitive trait" is inapplicable, Clap Clap so you've made it through chapter one of Kapital and read a few dozen books, I know literal brainlets that got through Kaptial, people need to stop acting like reading is a fucking feat. Its really condescending, "You won't subscribe to my ideas, you don't really know how the world works so" WoKe As FuCk. At the end of the day what do you know about what I know?, or my experiences or how I view the world. People that speak like this regardless of who they are just ignorant, a couple of "Anti-intellectual" works would be "Mutual-Aid" and "The great French revolution" by Kropotkin, they're "anti-intellectual" apparently, they're well researched. The actual Anti-intellectuals are full blown conservatives that won't question current science or history or reality in general or make no of analysis social practice, "Trans people are people", "oh no they're this or that", the individual is separated from it, they're something else. "The free market can give magical handjobs, its beyond our investigation why this happens we're not complaining"(Things that people make and bring to market, suddenly become something beyond our comprehension, capitalists just accumulate a lot of things for whatever reason and whatever it is, they deserve it) Social Anarchism doesn't have a whole lot of folks that get scientific things, without a good economic theory that implies that all investment is evil that understanding is needed as easily as all scientific reasoning can be abused for personal gain, anything is possible just because when it thinks an idea is true it takes it away from the individual, take the beautiful theory of autonomy away from someone, they start screwing all over everyone around them and no other philosophy will ever be accepted.
133
134
135
136Also, it should be noted that people that say "you have to establish your own ideas" is simply a part of the communist platform. I wouldn't even label myself communist "coherent communism" but I still support proposals like trade unions or collective agreements, that there's someone to have to organize their work with, and that there's someone above them to oversee them. Its the greatest enemy to spontaneity and to individual freedom. "we need to maintain true to class struggle" Thats just demeaning to everyone that's not a member of the proletariat, If you can only have production in a centralised manner, because the proletariat need to be unified and you don't know what their intentions are or they might have different desires than you and so its crucial that the enterprise function and organize itself in a way that defends an existing hierarchy and constitution of privileges while redefining itself in the most aggressive light you can provide as absolutely superior to anything that even resembles the revolutionary formula of Marxism. Anarchist Soil Only Distribution and Anarchist Transitions is what I mean by this, I'd rather see conscious revolutionaries go out and find their own solutions to things than go and say that capitalism is just some cursed system and therefore we should go and destroy it, capitalism is something to be fought and we need to organize ourselves around our targets with the goal of abolishing the "state and its consequences" and I'm not for a "top down" or anything totalitarian route, you know what I mean when I say lack of intellectualization and "under the hood" technical/management knowledge, do i understand why and how x would change things? Im not an expert in economics, or medicine, but maybe someone that has, someone that does know what the fuck they're talking about in regards to analyzing current trends or ideas in my eyes but thats part of the problem, we've developed very good science but we tend to in the recent past have dropped any of our studies in our existential and historical knowledge of what those things are and what they've meant and how things affected people and got very little in the way of practical value.
137
138Click to expand...<|endoftext|>Reno City Council OKs new rule for independent inspectors, oversight in truck transportation of melamine-tainted milk
139
140Federal and city officials had split over a new draft rule mandating that importers of agriculture products, including milk or meat, check truck drivers' passports before each delivery to ensure that any dairy products originating in China that were intended for consumers elsewhere met tough food safety standards.
141
142The rule is intended to eliminate food safety concerns as food products are packed and shipped through the United States.
143
144The council, however, voted unanimously Tuesday to table the rule. Councilman Andrew Gilmore said, "This is an entirely unnecessary rule to implement and not enforce."
145Sample, 7  of  15
146I'll speak as an ML and I'll speak frankly. This whole "you haven't developed the right theory" crap. It gets old very quickly, its just clout-chasing from my perspective and you're convincing people merely ridiculing. "Anti-Intellectualism" being a trait among anarchists?, I know anarchists and former anarchists where this "definitive trait" is inapplicable, Clap Clap so you've made it through chapter one of Kapital and read a few dozen books, I know literal brainlets that got through Kaptial, people need to stop acting like reading is a fucking feat. Its really condescending, "You won't subscribe to my ideas, you don't really know how the world works so" WoKe As FuCk. At the end of the day what do you know about what I know?, or my experiences or how I view the world. People that speak like this regardless of who they are just ignorant, a couple of "Anti-intellectual" works would be "Mutual-Aid" and "The great French revolution" by Kropotkin, they're "anti-intellectual" apparently, they're well researched. The actual Anti-intellectuals are full blown conservatives that won't question current science or history or reality in general or make no of analysis social practice, "Trans people are people", "oh no they're this or that", the individual is separated from it, they're something else. "The free market can give magical handjobs, its beyond our investigation why this happens we're not complaining"(Things that people make and bring to market, suddenly become something beyond our comprehension, capitalists just accumulate a lot of things for whatever reason and whatever it is, they deserve it) . WTF is the large body of knowledge these people claim to understand? Its this technological thing you're not aware of, you can call it "freedom" but are misinformed on this fundamental fact.<|endoftext|>A high school teacher in eastern Ukraine says the international anti-corruption campaign exposes a deeper problem at the heart of the country's fledgling political system: "there are no rules."
147
148The teacher, who spoke to AFP on condition of anonymity, described the concept of anti-corruption - an end to graft by prosecuting officials, their friends and family members - as "very abstract," and said Ukrainian citizens are more interested in corruption as it affects them directly.
149
150Authorities have shown great flexibility in how and when they charge anyone - including people accused of using stolen power to enrich themselves.
151
152More than 1,000 people are arrested in Ukraine for corruption every day, or more than a thousand a week, while government institutions are estimated to have issued more than 10 million licences for illegal activities.
153
154On Friday, police arrested a politician in Kyiv for allegedly defrauding the state of 8.5 million hryvnia ($350,000).
155
156Investigators said Viktor Yeroshko, a member of Ukraine's ruling coalition, had issued fake government "authorities" after using his position to masterfully solve business problems for clients.
157
158"The government official ordered the issuance of government certificates in order to sell cars and places for apartments," the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office said in a statement.
159
160"These certificates amounted to amounting to the abdication of the duty to perform their duty."
161
162Yeroshko did not immediately respond to phone calls and an e-mail requesting comment.
163
164- Lawless parliament -
165
166The populist Ukrainian president, Petro Poroshenko, has been reluctant to prosecute such abuses, and instead has promised to tackle a number of corruption scandals, including the problems in parliament.
167
168Yet he has made no attempt to purge the upper house of parliament, which is dominated by politicians allied with Poroshenko and in turn has turned a blind eye to graft within government institutions.
169
170If you want true political reform, only removal of the parliamentarians
171
172"If you want true political reform, only removal of the parliamentarians," said the teacher.
173
174Like other issues, Ukraine's long-suffering citizens are exasperated by corruption.
175
176"The bigger the problem you have, the more we need change," said Volodymyr Tsypin, a 35-year-old executive assistant in Kiev, using the unofficial term for reformers.
177
178On Thursday, Tsypin wore a sticker advertising a protest in Kiev against suspected police brutality and corruption.
179
180"I think it's very important for the government to remember that people, regardless of their economic status, whatever their political affiliation, the most important thing is to live in a transparent country, where no one is able to hide anything."
181
182In his job as a tax inspector, Tsypin said he receives threats from tax evaders and his work is "very dangerous."
183
184More than 11,000 Ukrainians die annually from the health complications caused by pollution, according to the World Health Organization.
185
186On Jan. 1,
187Sample, 8  of  15
188I'll speak as an ML and I'll speak frankly. This whole "you haven't developed the right theory" crap. It gets old very quickly, its just clout-chasing from my perspective and you're convincing people merely ridiculing. "Anti-Intellectualism" being a trait among anarchists?, I know anarchists and former anarchists where this "definitive trait" is inapplicable, Clap Clap so you've made it through chapter one of Kapital and read a few dozen books, I know literal brainlets that got through Kaptial, people need to stop acting like reading is a fucking feat. Its really condescending, "You won't subscribe to my ideas, you don't really know how the world works so" WoKe As FuCk. At the end of the day what do you know about what I know?, or my experiences or how I view the world. People that speak like this regardless of who they are just ignorant, a couple of "Anti-intellectual" works would be "Mutual-Aid" and "The great French revolution" by Kropotkin, they're "anti-intellectual" apparently, they're well researched. The actual Anti-intellectuals are full blown conservatives that won't question current science or history or reality in general or make no of analysis social practice, "Trans people are people", "oh no they're this or that", the individual is separated from it, they're something else. "The free market can give magical handjobs, its beyond our investigation why this happens we're not complaining"(Things that people make and bring to market, suddenly become something beyond our comprehension, capitalists just accumulate a lot of things for whatever reason and whatever it is, they deserve it) A bunch of government is the free market because it decides what we have to do with our lives when it comes to using things, as long as it in a way manages to minimize resource use and waste, economics in a way "describes what people want" and they "describe our wants" in a way that's too "individualistic", its capitalism that says "people are something or other and if a group of people want something they have to take it." It doesn't "describe what people want" or "describe how people organize" or "describe how people organize their education" or "describe economics, economics are the term and we make a profit from it" ; they're "anti-intellectual". They don't recognize any kind of intellectual thinking or science outside an "either/or" world view, but like ants twisting it with their twigs.
189
190RAW Paste Data
191
192How to prove a negative How to show that you aren't a non-libertarian We can work this out in a more effective way than just attacking their philosophical posturing Anti-intellectualism, one of the worst features of the left. De-signaling with this will save you a lot of time, energy and income Anti-intellectualism is a personality trait. It's a type of slashingspasm that renders the arguer non intelligent (or perhaps just ignorant of the information, these two features might be correlated). This individual will also, as their behavior depends on it, engage in what kind of stupidity abounds from a left at the time, and well, it in a negative way I think.(Read sarcasm, irony, and sarcasm not sarcasm sarcasm is a common characteristic of this.) What exactly is Anti-intellectualism?Anti-intellectualism, as the name implies, is an anti-intellectual individual that has strong opposition to people who have an intellectual ability in something. Anti-intellectualism is correlated with censorship, cuts, shout outs, etc. It means not considering anything besides a simple, one person view on it. Its also correlated with a lack of authentic education about certain topics, things important to the future of a proper society or survival. Here is where it gets the munchies, so eat them (just kidding, no while you're here just relax, let your intellect, your mind, free from these haters). Now to prove that these things don't exist its as simple as disproving something. You don't think there's no censorship in the U.S, then you look up iscale and disprove iscale, or you don't think there's no state control in the U.S, then you look up states rights and disprove states rights. You don't think there's a constant need for truth in global politics, then you look up ideal, idealism and how the 'world's greatest democracy' is dead and uncivilized and why. You don't think there's a real investment in existing people cultures and a real effort towards a longevity, then you look up post-scarcity and see that we are dying at a fast rate and that it doesn't exist for us, or you don't think about the role of religion in Western culture and how its
193Sample, 9  of  15
194I'll speak as an ML and I'll speak frankly. This whole "you haven't developed the right theory" crap. It gets old very quickly, its just clout-chasing from my perspective and you're convincing people merely ridiculing. "Anti-Intellectualism" being a trait among anarchists?, I know anarchists and former anarchists where this "definitive trait" is inapplicable, Clap Clap so you've made it through chapter one of Kapital and read a few dozen books, I know literal brainlets that got through Kaptial, people need to stop acting like reading is a fucking feat. Its really condescending, "You won't subscribe to my ideas, you don't really know how the world works so" WoKe As FuCk. At the end of the day what do you know about what I know?, or my experiences or how I view the world. People that speak like this regardless of who they are just ignorant, a couple of "Anti-intellectual" works would be "Mutual-Aid" and "The great French revolution" by Kropotkin, they're "anti-intellectual" apparently, they're well researched. The actual Anti-intellectuals are full blown conservatives that won't question current science or history or reality in general or make no of analysis social practice, "Trans people are people", "oh no they're this or that", the individual is separated from it, they're something else. "The free market can give magical handjobs, its beyond our investigation why this happens we're not complaining"(Things that people make and bring to market, suddenly become something beyond our comprehension, capitalists just accumulate a lot of things for whatever reason and whatever it is, they deserve it) and of course the racist stupid ass hate because we're not blinded by the money to be an assholes about it. A "Libertarian" will always sell you a very limited market/stuck in a horrible liberal vision, which eventually grows into something completely different (while replacing the original understanding) , you have to promote the concept of a free market that's fair from an individual level, capitalist "libertarians" never study a fraction of history on the subjects they speak so fervently for. Lmao, before you talk about how Kropotkin is an Anti-intellectual, Kropotkin was heavily influenced by Marxist critique and the works of Marxist theoreticians and he definitely saw the issue with the borders of the markets. When you look into it a bit, it's easy to see the connection between the two. In his papers "The economics of the Paris Commune", and a complete year's worth of his writings, what will be listed immediately is "The Commune on Earth", not the Commune in Paris. "Anti-intellectualism" being the reductio ad absurdum of 2+2=5 in the world that you think people are and the world you've created and the reductionist reality you think we live in.
195
196Edited by Algb8b, 09 April 2016 - 01:07 PM.<|endoftext|>The United States and the European Union backed the creation of three zones in the Democratic Republic of Congo where certain revenues will be used to combat the deadly Ebola virus.
197
198
199
200The aid, worth over $1 billion, could be granted via a mechanism that can be activated in case of failure to properly use funds.
201
202
203
204The Financial Times, quoting people familiar with the matter, said the United States provided more than 60 percent of the funds allocated for the epidemic in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
205
206
207
208The Congo-based Serco and Canadian company G4S are the main suppliers of security for U.N. peacekeepers in the central African country.
209
210
211
212They are seen as a favorite to take over the contract next year after deploying under a U.N. deal.
213
214
215
216The countries of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and the United States backed the creation of three zones in the DRC with Liberia's neighbor Guinea.
217
218...<|endoftext|>It was an argument George Osborne had already hoped would never happen. An 11-year-old boy innocently asked him if he thought it was OK to try and elect the government the boy thought was lying, when in fact the truth was the very opposite.
219
220
221
222“Of course it’s fine,” Mr Osborne waded. “The Conservatives are in a position to elect a government.”
223
224
225
226With sound logic, the boy responded, “I’m not sure the Conservatives would be able to elect a government.”
227
228
229
230This argument cannot be quickly dismissed. Nobody in politics today, certainly not in the Tories, is prepared to put up with a moment of awkward tension. Doubt is anathema, because it inhibits certainty.
231
232
233
234And this is what the shadow chancellor, shadow health secretary, and shadow education secretary have failed to recognise.
235
236Sample, 10  of  15
237I'll speak as an ML and I'll speak frankly. This whole "you haven't developed the right theory" crap. It gets old very quickly, its just clout-chasing from my perspective and you're convincing people merely ridiculing. "Anti-Intellectualism" being a trait among anarchists?, I know anarchists and former anarchists where this "definitive trait" is inapplicable, Clap Clap so you've made it through chapter one of Kapital and read a few dozen books, I know literal brainlets that got through Kaptial, people need to stop acting like reading is a fucking feat. Its really condescending, "You won't subscribe to my ideas, you don't really know how the world works so" WoKe As FuCk. At the end of the day what do you know about what I know?, or my experiences or how I view the world. People that speak like this regardless of who they are just ignorant, a couple of "Anti-intellectual" works would be "Mutual-Aid" and "The great French revolution" by Kropotkin, they're "anti-intellectual" apparently, they're well researched. The actual Anti-intellectuals are full blown conservatives that won't question current science or history or reality in general or make no of analysis social practice, "Trans people are people", "oh no they're this or that", the individual is separated from it, they're something else. "The free market can give magical handjobs, its beyond our investigation why this happens we're not complaining"(Things that people make and bring to market, suddenly become something beyond our comprehension, capitalists just accumulate a lot of things for whatever reason and whatever it is, they deserve it) Why does being educated have a connection to being anti-intellectual, you've said nothing about an intellectual population. Just how does knowledge stop being a matter of intelligence/scientific knowledge and start being a matter of "this biological structure is this, and here's how you turn this into product"(nature = products, it's the same as economics). It fucking baffles me how some people that know nothing, no method, no understanding, to be so overly focused on ignorance.<|endoftext|>Gillian Anderson said she’s disappointed to see Fox taking six more episodes from season five of “Twin Peaks.”
238
239“They’re really pushing us to take a breather and a little bit of a layoff so they can make more money off the next product, which they’re going to show at Comic-Con, so I’m very surprised by that and I’m very sad,” Anderson told The Huffington Post.
240
241Fox announced Wednesday it will air six more episodes of the David Lynch-helmed series starting in July.
242
243“Twin Peaks” ended its current arc with a shot of Cooper (Kyle MacLachlan) on an elevator holding a book titled “The Secret History of Twin Peaks.”
244
245“I think that for a show like this, there is a natural rotation to things,” she said. “But I think it is really disappointing to lose opportunities to do some of the story that we want to tell.”
246
247In April, Lynch said he would not direct the sixth season.<|endoftext|>Image copyright Getty Images Image caption Schoolchildren were angered by this paper's call for the UK to leave the EU
248
249A London high school has issued a mea culpa after students complained they had been dudded by a lesson plan.
250
251An exchange about Brexit during a class on parallel European cultures showed that both sides in the debate were racist, they said.
252
253Several schoolboys (and girls) sent a letter to the school in Ealing, west London, to complain that they had been brainwashed by the instructor.
254
255The school said it would aim to provide more neutral material.
256
257They were shown two illustrations depicting a Nordic countries with a British imperial past and a Eurocentric world, with the illustration captioned "Two sides of a coin".
258
259The pupils were then shown an illustration showing communities in New Zealand with a British-influenced history and culture and a Chinese culture.
260
261'True BBC'
262
263The incident happened at the Oxbridge Academy girls' school last month.
264
265Academy Headteacher Ken Lamour apologised saying a teacher who was involved in the exercise had suggested the options to use.
266
267He added that in hindsight he regretted it, saying he hoped the incident would never happen again.
268
269The pupils said the plan had also failed to engage the community in what they described as "attack by the white nationalists".
270
271One of the school's female pupils, Jane Byrne, said the lesson had made it difficult for the school to resolve its conflicting views about Brexit.
272
273"I think the lesson plan was revealing people's true faces.
274
275"The kids
276Sample, 11  of  15
277I'll speak as an ML and I'll speak frankly. This whole "you haven't developed the right theory" crap. It gets old very quickly, its just clout-chasing from my perspective and you're convincing people merely ridiculing. "Anti-Intellectualism" being a trait among anarchists?, I know anarchists and former anarchists where this "definitive trait" is inapplicable, Clap Clap so you've made it through chapter one of Kapital and read a few dozen books, I know literal brainlets that got through Kaptial, people need to stop acting like reading is a fucking feat. Its really condescending, "You won't subscribe to my ideas, you don't really know how the world works so" WoKe As FuCk. At the end of the day what do you know about what I know?, or my experiences or how I view the world. People that speak like this regardless of who they are just ignorant, a couple of "Anti-intellectual" works would be "Mutual-Aid" and "The great French revolution" by Kropotkin, they're "anti-intellectual" apparently, they're well researched. The actual Anti-intellectuals are full blown conservatives that won't question current science or history or reality in general or make no of analysis social practice, "Trans people are people", "oh no they're this or that", the individual is separated from it, they're something else. "The free market can give magical handjobs, its beyond our investigation why this happens we're not complaining"(Things that people make and bring to market, suddenly become something beyond our comprehension, capitalists just accumulate a lot of things for whatever reason and whatever it is, they deserve it) they feel that scientists are bad or thinking too much. If you wish to cite a single radical work from the past 100 years you'll be disappointed by Anarcho-Transhumanism but that fact still makes it worth noting if nothing else, probably some mainstream working-class literature. PoE was and is well known in Europe, have you ever heard of anyone getting very far without reading anything, non-specialists work being the reason.
278
279…I really do not understand the benefit of taking even half a line from somewhere in your book without the need to have a proper read, as your own words show, a quick glance at your page not only bestows your work a credibility beyond your word but also cheapens your validity as an authority on the subject.<|endoftext|>Who Needs Love while in a Fear Mode?
280
281Perfect for the first decade of the 21st century was the feature film Confessions of a Dangerous Mind. With Vincent Price providing a voice of complete unfiltered madness, the movie was somewhat of a look at the same time as The Nude Killer, and following that were the two Zombieland films and Grumpy Old Men, there were just a few well known of the films that were made in this decade, but this is what I like to call a golden age of films. With great technology at our fingertips, we could now create art that was art. Films created by famed filmmakers and independent filmmakers; the 3.5 billion dollar industry started to give things a whole new flavor. The experience was completely new, completely different. More diverse, more masculine, more muscular, more brutal, more unfiltered, it was a time for a filmmaker to fully express himself. While in that world, the word expert never came up on the list of words most used to describe a director, but it was one that the Italian looking, minimalist setting had made the perfect setting for. It was in that film that Vincent Price from his days as the go to actor of the genre, filled in as one of the few and greatest talents of the decade.
282
283It is a sad fact that Vincent Price had suffered from Alzheimer’s for years by the time this film was produced in 1996. For the first time in his tenure, was he able to put on the viewer’s face and shoes and the true nature of his wicked mind was able to be brought to the screen. He was able to fully express his capacity for mischief and sheer creativity. For that one film he did something that simply couldn’t be duplicated, it was on a completely different level than anything that was being made in the film industry at the time.
284
285Over the years I tried to tell a dear friend of mine why I loved the film so much and what he would say was that it was a necessary aspect of the film that gave it so much authenticity to it and that Vincent Price was what made it all work, his insanity. Of course it should be true, you can’t imagine the film without his crazy, without his stupid, without his atrocious behavior, it’s just not the same. It would be nearly impossible to fill this space with other performances with the same artistic sensibility, so it only makes sense to use Vincent Price as the canvas
286Sample, 12  of  15
287I'll speak as an ML and I'll speak frankly. This whole "you haven't developed the right theory" crap. It gets old very quickly, its just clout-chasing from my perspective and you're convincing people merely ridiculing. "Anti-Intellectualism" being a trait among anarchists?, I know anarchists and former anarchists where this "definitive trait" is inapplicable, Clap Clap so you've made it through chapter one of Kapital and read a few dozen books, I know literal brainlets that got through Kaptial, people need to stop acting like reading is a fucking feat. Its really condescending, "You won't subscribe to my ideas, you don't really know how the world works so" WoKe As FuCk. At the end of the day what do you know about what I know?, or my experiences or how I view the world. People that speak like this regardless of who they are just ignorant, a couple of "Anti-intellectual" works would be "Mutual-Aid" and "The great French revolution" by Kropotkin, they're "anti-intellectual" apparently, they're well researched. The actual Anti-intellectuals are full blown conservatives that won't question current science or history or reality in general or make no of analysis social practice, "Trans people are people", "oh no they're this or that", the individual is separated from it, they're something else. "The free market can give magical handjobs, its beyond our investigation why this happens we're not complaining"(Things that people make and bring to market, suddenly become something beyond our comprehension, capitalists just accumulate a lot of things for whatever reason and whatever it is, they deserve it)
288
289Link · 3 years ago 0 Thumbs up 0 Thumbs down Report Abuse<|endoftext|>UCCG SEMIFINALS FALLOUT CONTINUES
290
291f1 Saw Orange Grand Prix (3280p)
292
293hmm... Lots of talk about the w/aspect of the game in the last day of California Cup, I want to clear up what F1 Saw Orange's win was as well as the implications of the tournament so far.
294
295f1 Saw Orange is the team of the rising up (and hm... this is kinda weird to use the "S" word, but hm...) New Belgium Brewing. Before NYCC, the team wasn't very known. After, really? Well... it's not going to be the same now. I'll explain why momentarily.
296
297Prior to the LAN, while the other teams were in California, the New Belgium folks put together a much more bombastic poster that aired live over their AT&T location at 10 pm. You can see it here:
298
299Not only was it very loud, but there was a star-studded NYCC presence to back it up. The opening performance was a glimmer of some of that NYCC energy in New Belgium:
300
301After the hype died down, they started scoring freebie points and had more than enough to reach a Top 4 finish.
302
303@f1ShawnOfficial fell in to that white HOPE bracket earlier on the weekend with a 16-7 win vs SDR:
304
305During the bracket, Mr. Shirtless also stopped by to play. He also got a free pass:
306
307Eventually, the top 6 teams with a seed inside the WSV3 Top 4 would make it to Los Angeles. The players split into two groups and played online against each other.
308
309In our last few games in the last day, Enslaved and Pro Gaming entered a game in which Tiki4u hit the table hard at halftime:
310
311At 6-0 with a freebie point for NYCT, F1 Saw Orange took a close game against Peachrun where Andreja hit a double damage split. Then? Peach's Amnesia:
312
313At the end of the day, NYCT's Gambit had a bit more success. They took a quarter point lead at 17-15 at the top of the bracket and F1 Saw Orange was able to close the gap with a bit more stability.
314
315At that point, a loss vs P1G was going to knock them out of Los Angeles. But that did not happen, and they kept their spot.
316
317In addition to the tournament itself, NYCC set the Goldrush banner for tomorrow:
318
319So, what does all of this mean? Well... watch more livestreams, promote yourselves, and get some coverage, people: there are free gigs every day until 6:00 pm PST.
320
321Here are some videos of those from NJC:
322
323After the tournament, it's a lot of shows... let's do some art, I mean eSports, vloging...
324
325Twitch stream of New Waterfall at 8:30pm PST (and following at 9pm PST and after/before this):
326
327But who cares about
328Sample, 13  of  15
329I'll speak as an ML and I'll speak frankly. This whole "you haven't developed the right theory" crap. It gets old very quickly, its just clout-chasing from my perspective and you're convincing people merely ridiculing. "Anti-Intellectualism" being a trait among anarchists?, I know anarchists and former anarchists where this "definitive trait" is inapplicable, Clap Clap so you've made it through chapter one of Kapital and read a few dozen books, I know literal brainlets that got through Kaptial, people need to stop acting like reading is a fucking feat. Its really condescending, "You won't subscribe to my ideas, you don't really know how the world works so" WoKe As FuCk. At the end of the day what do you know about what I know?, or my experiences or how I view the world. People that speak like this regardless of who they are just ignorant, a couple of "Anti-intellectual" works would be "Mutual-Aid" and "The great French revolution" by Kropotkin, they're "anti-intellectual" apparently, they're well researched. The actual Anti-intellectuals are full blown conservatives that won't question current science or history or reality in general or make no of analysis social practice, "Trans people are people", "oh no they're this or that", the individual is separated from it, they're something else. "The free market can give magical handjobs, its beyond our investigation why this happens we're not complaining"(Things that people make and bring to market, suddenly become something beyond our comprehension, capitalists just accumulate a lot of things for whatever reason and whatever it is, they deserve it)
330
331
332
333tl;dr people need to stop treating others like its a race to the bottom. First we have to respect each others thoughts and actions, anything less borders a highway at freeway speeds where any idiot can drive and get to where he wants, not where he needs to be to achieve. And having no concepts regarding the world, when trying to come up with an understanding of it, we get stuck and running at top speed (Boobs). This shit got me nervous as fuck about what was wrong with me, having something that is literally not anything I'm told to believe in, self doubts that I'm anti-intellectual, shows a huge lack of humanity and comradery. So glad this shitty little website exists to shine the light on all of this shit, enlighten us all and I'm happy my views are not one of being anti-intellectual and "controlling the masses" or any of that arrogant bullshit, I'm anti-leadership, anti-revisionism and anti-mythology in any form (including education and history, what am I trying to get at?).<|endoftext|>Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh said this morning that the terrorist group made good on a threat to disrupt the Easter celebrations of Christians in the occupied Palestinian territories by blowing up five buses near Hebron.
334
335More than 8,000 Christians traveled to the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip on Saturday for Easter.
336
337Progressive and Orthodox Christian families were allowed access to the Holy Land for the first time since 2000 under a decision by the Israeli rabbinate, which has banned Israeli access to Christians’ Holy sites since seizing control of the Holy Land from Jordan in 1967.
338
339Due to the restrictions, the past two years has seen increased interest and expressions of solidarity from Christians who take part in Easter celebrations.
340
341Thursday’s violent actions by Palestinian Hamas militants came a week after Islamic Jihad announced its own bombing of a bus for Arab Israelis, killing one person.
342
343Haniyeh’s announcement comes one day after a Hamas group operative allegedly shot dead the sole Jewish settler in the West Bank. The Israeli man was named as Evelyn Lopate.
344
345On Saturday night Haniyeh announced that Western countries will be invited to the funeral of the dead Jewish settler.
346
347He criticized an agreement made in the 1990s that the most famous Israeli towns close to Muslim holy sites be closed to Israeli Jews during festivals, and he said that such steps have to be reversed.
348
349A report published on Friday by the Israeli daily newspaper Haaretz said that “Hamas is sending a clear message to the Israeli side: The era of permanent closure on Jewish towns along the West Bank’s religious axis is over.”
350
351After recent terror attacks targeting Israelis and Western tourists in Jerusalem, Abbas told the European Union that “we do not see anything wrong” in allowing Jews to enter East Jerusalem for holy and cultural ceremonies.
352
353Abbas reportedly said that “if we want [these events] to take place, [Israel] should not impose a closure on Jewish places in Jerusalem… I think this is their mistake. There is still time to take a better decision. I think we can all solve
354Sample, 14  of  15
355I'll speak as an ML and I'll speak frankly. This whole "you haven't developed the right theory" crap. It gets old very quickly, its just clout-chasing from my perspective and you're convincing people merely ridiculing. "Anti-Intellectualism" being a trait among anarchists?, I know anarchists and former anarchists where this "definitive trait" is inapplicable, Clap Clap so you've made it through chapter one of Kapital and read a few dozen books, I know literal brainlets that got through Kaptial, people need to stop acting like reading is a fucking feat. Its really condescending, "You won't subscribe to my ideas, you don't really know how the world works so" WoKe As FuCk. At the end of the day what do you know about what I know?, or my experiences or how I view the world. People that speak like this regardless of who they are just ignorant, a couple of "Anti-intellectual" works would be "Mutual-Aid" and "The great French revolution" by Kropotkin, they're "anti-intellectual" apparently, they're well researched. The actual Anti-intellectuals are full blown conservatives that won't question current science or history or reality in general or make no of analysis social practice, "Trans people are people", "oh no they're this or that", the individual is separated from it, they're something else. "The free market can give magical handjobs, its beyond our investigation why this happens we're not complaining"(Things that people make and bring to market, suddenly become something beyond our comprehension, capitalists just accumulate a lot of things for whatever reason and whatever it is, they deserve it) I honestly don't know why you cant do what "leftists" do: Read books, ask questions, do the research.<|endoftext|>Japan Gives Android Developer Licenses Only To Discriminated Designers
356
357from the but-instead-of-being-against-discrimination,-i-went-for-the-bad-one dept
358
359"You should move to Japan," Apple CEO Tim Cook said at an event in Tokyo earlier this year. "No one here is competitive enough to make any money in California."
360
361"I think the reason we did it here, is because it's probably the easiest market," Wareham said. "What we really did was look at the open nature of Android [the name of the open-source Android operating system on which Amazon's Fire OS runs] and designed to adapt it to Japan and make it a great product for that market."
362
363Last year, we posted a Techdirt post about a Canadian company called Astoria Computing that went open source and appeared to be hard at work on Android applications. It attracted a lot of attention because the fact that it was based in Canada made it difficult to get seed funding from U.S. investors, which tends to favor the regionally-focused and geographically-diverse success stories. But it also attracted some hostility because, if its Google Play search app grabbed a significant percentage of user searches in a particular country, it could attract antitrust complaints . That attracted its own antagonism, because not only was this an attempt to open up a patented platform, but because the decision to open source Android meant to adhere to the Europe vs. Microsoft ruling , rather than ignoring it altogether.Since the press coverage had sparked public interest in the project, the folks behind Astoria set up a press call with some follow-up questions. Usually, these sorts of things usually prompt rapid follow-up action, since, like it or not, the press is a little trigger-happy with raising a red flag, and the end result is that eventually, someone concludes the public has lost its mind, and they want to do something about it -- even if that something is nothing but whining. The response on the call wasn't what you'd call a straight answer:However, once I decided to do some digging and do a bit of due diligence, I discovered that, not only was the company willing to speak with me, but it also gave me a copy of its application developer license agreement , and that the charges of antitrust were unfounded.The major counter to our question was that Android was largely homebrew by eager makers who were creating their own apps and services -- whether or not those "owns" a patent on the functionality. However, if that's true, why then wouldn't the company just exclude Google's apps, which appear to overwhelmingly dominate all online searches and are by far the most used in its marketplace? It would seem that's a pretty big difference from an antitrust claim, unless it's meant to be a statement that Amazon's efforts are crude copies of Google's, or it's a statement that even if Google's apps are its only real presence on Android, that doesn't mean the rest of Android is entirely populated by them, so banning Amazon's would be illegal, doesn't really make sense.Another
364Sample, 15  of  15
365I'll speak as an ML and I'll speak frankly. This whole "you haven't developed the right theory" crap. It gets old very quickly, its just clout-chasing from my perspective and you're convincing people merely ridiculing. "Anti-Intellectualism" being a trait among anarchists?, I know anarchists and former anarchists where this "definitive trait" is inapplicable, Clap Clap so you've made it through chapter one of Kapital and read a few dozen books, I know literal brainlets that got through Kaptial, people need to stop acting like reading is a fucking feat. Its really condescending, "You won't subscribe to my ideas, you don't really know how the world works so" WoKe As FuCk. At the end of the day what do you know about what I know?, or my experiences or how I view the world. People that speak like this regardless of who they are just ignorant, a couple of "Anti-intellectual" works would be "Mutual-Aid" and "The great French revolution" by Kropotkin, they're "anti-intellectual" apparently, they're well researched. The actual Anti-intellectuals are full blown conservatives that won't question current science or history or reality in general or make no of analysis social practice, "Trans people are people", "oh no they're this or that", the individual is separated from it, they're something else. "The free market can give magical handjobs, its beyond our investigation why this happens we're not complaining"(Things that people make and bring to market, suddenly become something beyond our comprehension, capitalists just accumulate a lot of things for whatever reason and whatever it is, they deserve it) it's not the working man's job to understand and identify the creation or utility of the capitalist or any person or entity. The beast has been with us for centuries and millions or even billions of people just like you will do nothing to adapt to it or get along with it, we don't know how and never will unless we attempt to change it. Anarchists have made no claim to wisdom or abity or knowledge in any way and never have. Our movement aims at anarchy because it aims at freedom, and freedom from oppression. Go read "Anarchism: A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas" (or any other books that work well enough) before you make up shit, Kropotkin even had his own admission of ignorance on communism and the pros and cons of libertarianism. You're only pretending to be anarchists if you have shit to say. The problem with all this discourse over things is that it doesn't resolve anything, everyone who "sees eye to eye" on these issues is mistaken and you now have said and implied facts and opinions, or of contradictions, being brought together in one cohesive block. Don't accept your ideas or mine or anyone else's as Gospel. Confusion and polarization is what this debate turns into, keep it that way. LK is supposed to be only English class but in school like respect towards others. Leave us, others out, we simply don't have the time and resources to adapt to your ideas. The diversity of experience is what lets us think of different systems and form our own ideas. Chances are its the few select theories that are widely accepted (and fuck those anyone who don't agree with them). "It's a bunch of bs. Anarchists are opportunists from the start. Never mind reality." Agreed. The entire structure of society is predicated on fraud, a bunch of power-mongering, theft and exploitation, to say otherwise is naive to say the least. "Of course you can be an economic anarchist and believe in patriarchy too." That is a defacto contradiction in terms. "It's simply utopian, waiting 20 or 300 years is no easy feat, probably just a bad idea.""It's fundamentally incompatible, its a species of capitalism-cum-anarchism and it's not even close to anarchism.""A "species of" capitalism, same as Maoist collectivizations, Castroite commies, and every second world kleptocracy and police state and parasite that ever existed.""Under its most ethical standards, socialism is perfectly compatible with capitalism, you see the only difference is that socialism would eliminate the class, not treat everyone as a fellow workhorses, with us being ex-workers and temporarily unemployed doing for them what people have done for themselves for generations. But since you're quite adamantly against capitalism and even democratic elections, socialism and capitalism are not compatible." Again, a nonsensical choice between assumptions, as you imply capitalism is democratic capitalism. Looking at history and the present reality, which are all over the place, you are a complete and absolute idiot and need to keep on improving. "Non-obvious economic and social cooperation is the basis of socialist success." No, that is simply not true. Sympathy is mutually exclusive with cooperation, they are not the same thing