· 6 years ago · Oct 08, 2019, 02:54 AM
1GNUfags BTFO Nanonymous 2019-10-07 22:09:01 No.7930 [D][U][F][S][L][A][C] >>7931 >>7953
2File: 27ec05320deb71a4c3e7392dbcc3a28c0ab2bcdc57f2606cc3741fc32b556796.gif (dl) (354.95 KiB)
3https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2019/joint-statement-on-the-gnu-project/
4
5>We believe that Richard Stallman cannot represent all of GNU. We think it is now time for GNU maintainers to collectively decide about the organization of the project. The GNU Project we want to build is one that everyone can trust to defend their freedom.
6
7HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA STALLKIKE ETERNALLY BTFO WHAT WILL YOU FREETARDS DO NOW HUH? TELL ME HUH?
8
9Signed:
10>Ludovic Courtès (GNU Guix, GNU Guile)
11>Ricardo Wurmus (GNU Guix, GNU GWL)
12>Matt Lee (GNU Social)
13>Andreas Enge (GNU MPC)
14>Samuel Thibault (GNU Hurd, GNU libc)
15>Carlos O'Donell (GNU libc)
16>Andy Wingo (GNU Guile)
17>Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso (GNU Octave)
18>Mark Wielaard (GNU Classpath)
19>Ian Lance Taylor (GCC, GNU Binutils)
20>Werner Koch (GnuPG)
21>Daiki Ueno (GNU gettext, GNU libiconv, GNU libunistring)
22>Christopher Lemmer Webber (GNU MediaGoblin)
23>Jan Nieuwenhuizen (GNU Mes, GNU LilyPond)
24>John Wiegley (GNU Emacs)
25>Tom Tromey (GCC, GDB)
26>Jeff Law (GCC, Binutils — not signing on behalf of the GCC Steering Committee)
27>Han-Wen Nienhuys (GNU LilyPond)
28>Joshua Gay (GNU and Free Software Speaker)
29>Ian Jackson (GNU adns, GNU userv)
30
31>tfw they're all the most major GPOO projects
32pic related
33
34Nanonymous 2019-10-07 22:33:46 No.7931 [D] >>7043 >>7044 >>7933
35>>7930
36Are you crossposting from 4cuck?
37https://boards.4channel.org/g/thread/73074508
38https://archive.rebeccablacktech.com/g/thread/73074508
39
40Nanonymous 2019-10-07 22:51:11 No.7933 [D]
41>>7931
42Are YOU?
43
44Nanonymous 2019-10-07 23:56:10 No.7938 [D] >>7949 >>7954
45I don't understand. One fat old GNUfag is being replaced by a bunch of younger and probably less fat GNUfags. Why the BTFO?
46>tfw they're all the most major GPOO projects
47What's GPOO? I tried to cuckcuckgo it, to no real luck.
48
49Nanonymous 2019-10-08 02:15:46 No.7948 [D] >>7951
50Sounds tarded.
51A bunch of moralfag panicking tards.
52
53Where does Stallman go now?
54Do we switch away from GNU?
55Considering how shallow they were about this, who knows what BS they'll roll with next.
56Unless you go with the premise that this was just an excuse to get rid of Stallman for not being a nice person in general.
57
58I don't know what to think about this.
59
60Nanonymous 2019-10-08 02:17:28 No.7949 [D]
61>>7938
62I think by "GPOO" they mean "GNU".
63
64Nanonymous 2019-10-08 02:20:08 No.7951 [D]
65>>7948
66A concerted effort to remove the originator of the free software movement.
67
68Nanonymous 2019-10-08 02:34:42 No.7953 [D][U][F] >>7955
69File: 04dd8ed728f16f4749d8bb5e5b344cec7d3d9327e6418c680fd24bd5a0f26945.png (dl) (53.58 KiB)
70>>7930
71I wasn't surprised when MIT 86ed commie Santa. I was fairly surprised that the FSF pressured him to resign, though I suppose I shouldn't have been, since money is involved (FSF's dependence on donations).
72
73I figured GNU would be the ol' fungus-sucker's last bastion. And it was. But I figured it would be his permanent last bastion, I guess; something he'd be able to cling on to. And, granted, unless there's an update since OP posted, he's still there, albeit with a number of prominent members of the GNU project basically calling for him to be memory-holed.
74
75Some of the projects and people are meh. I mean, GNU indent? lol, fuck off, Andrej Sladura, whoever you are, you fucking irrelevant slavnigger. A number of people from glibc and gcc signed on, though. Plus Wiegley from Emacs, Wingo from Guile, and Koch from GnuPG. That's big. That's baaaad for Stallman-sama.
76
77Stallman's only hope now is to play the jew card. To say that he's being shoah'd 6,000,000 times by evil goyim determined to turn him into a lampshade. Or, given his ample size, many lampshades.
78
79But Stallman is oddly ethical (for a jew), and I don't think he'll do that. Is this the last speedbump on the way to Stallman's slide into ignominy and obscurity?
80
81I should note I just saw picrel on his homepage.
82
83Nanonymous 2019-10-08 02:36:24 No.7954 [D]
84>>7938
85Are you playing dumb?
86GNU = guh-new
87GPOO = guh-poo
88Basically calling GNU poo, or "poop".
89
90Nanonymous 2019-10-08 02:37:49 No.7955 [D]
91>>7953
92pic rel has been there for a few days. He'll probably say something more definitive eventually.