X2Mmu9nT

1 hey everyone sorry for the setup today
2my tripod thing broke and so everything
3is just very precariously placed on a
4bunch of books and you can see the mic
5in the screen but I had to film this
6today I have been up most of the night
7just flooded with thoughts and it's just
8honestly bursting out of me I don't
9think I've been so excited to make a
10video in a long long time so I'm making
11this video to clarify a lot of things
12that I said in my last video which I
13thought were going to be clear I mean I
14was very vague but I was intentionally
15vague because I was trying to be a
16little bit diplomatic I guess but in
17this video I'm going to be very very
18explicit because somehow even though I
19was very clear to say that the
20transition will likely not be nonviolent
21people thought hey are you saying that
22all revolutionary violence is bad are
23you saying that all revolutions that
24have ever happened are just terrible and
25bad
26hey are you saying that men are
27inherently violent and aggressive and
28women are just inherently nurturing and
29compassionate are you saying there are
30no women revolutionaries is that what
31you're saying Maxie no that's not what I
32said and it's not what I was trying to
33say so stay tuned later I'm going to
34talk about the difference between
35capital our Revolution and regular our
36revolution and I actually think that
37regular our revolution is imminent I
38actually do and I don't think it's going
39to be nonviolent necessarily and I don't
40think it's going to be patriarchal so
41stay tuned for that
42but first I'm going to start with
43patriarchy marine and I made a podcast
44called could capitalism exists without
45patriarchy which I invite you to listen
46to but in it we talk about how
47capitalism although it exacerbates
48patriarchy patriarchy as we all know
49very clearly far out dates capitalism
50and we talked about how capitalism is
51nearly the logical extension
52of thousands and thousands of years of
53patriarchy and of patriarchal modes of
54governance but also patriarchal memos
55you know patriarchal values patriarchal
56ways of speaking and thinking and
57engaging with one another
58patriarchy as a system valorizes
59toxically masculine ways of interaction
60of posturing of competition of dominance
61of bending people to your will and of
62might as right mentality patriarchy is
63steeped in other ring and other at its
64core is the egos form of defense it's I
65feel insecure about my manhood or my
66relative position of power and feeling
67like I might lose that and so I am going
68to other you because other ring is
69defining the other in order to define
70the self right so if I'm other in you as
71less than that I am simultaneously
72defining myself as better than and it
73works the same way with racism
74homophobia transphobia ableism fat
75phobia etc the whole gambit that very
76unfortunately do rear their ugly heads
77in leftist spaces I'm going to talk
78about science and materialism later on
79but Syed's Orientalism provides a great
80framework for understanding how white
81man's burden and patriarchal Eurocentric
82visions of progress rationality etc have
83been baked into the ways that we
84understand our society as subjects of a
85colonial patriarchal capitalist settler
86state so we've all been colonized with
87these mindsets they exist within us and
88different people in the society have
89been socialized differently to think and
90act and engage with other people in
91different ways for different reasons
92this does not mean that there's anything
93inherent in those people that makes them
94act or behave in certain ways over
95others this is about our systemic
96socialization under patriarchy and
97capitalism many non men have reached out
98to me and thanked me sincerely for
99saying all of this because they largely
100agree with me but they would
101dare speak up and say anything in
102male-dominated leftist spaces or even in
103spaces that include women and people of
104color but where it's understood that
105there's a certain bravado required I've
106had menses meant so many sis men have
107come to me and said thank you so much
108for what you have said because I feel
109the same way but I wouldn't dare bring
110this up with my friends my leftist
111friends or in my leftist space or
112whatnot and you know having grown up
113socialized a woman I mean I definitely
114know what it's like when you're in a
115space and you know all the dudes are
116making horrible sexist racist violent
117jokes and you want to be the cool girl
118right you don't want to be the girl
119that's outcasted so you know and then
120they'll look at you and say something
121like oh gee are you offended that that
122offend you or does that hurt your weak
123sensibilities and you have to just sit
124there and then join the posturing and be
125like no no I don't find with that I'm
126totally good with that yeah mass-murder
127cool yeah let's keep talking about it
128yeah I'm totally fine I'm a cool girl
129I'm not saying everyone in leftist
130spaces or everyone who's into capital
131are revolution is being toxically
132masculine but I am saying that we've
133created spaces unconsciously or not
134where people are forced to be the
135metaphorical cool girl which typically
136means accepting capital our revolution
137as the only rational way forward and
138often indulging people in jokes or
139serious talk about lining everyone up
140who is profited off the system against
141the wall there's a definite
142revolutionary bravado in many of these
143spaces that seems to valorize
144spectacular eyes violence more than more
145femme coated activities of building
146relationship and trust and here I want
147to bring up a very telling example from
148Catherine my great comrade who has an
149amazing YouTube channel go check out
150Catherine but she was telling me about
151how she went to this socialist
152conference and the very first day was a
153feminist day I suppose it was for non
154men only
155in that day the conversations were
156beautiful people were listening to each
157other with deep empathy and humility and
158responding with respects and people were
159actually coming together and thinking of
160productive things to do and ways forward
161it was all great the next two days were
162opened up to men and very predictably
163perhaps but also shockingly shocking and
164telling is that then it just evolved
165into the ml's yelling at the trots and
166the trots yelling at the anarchists and
167everyone tried to prove who was right
168and who was wrong and everything became
169completely unproductive even though you
170know women were there non men were there
171people of color were there the
172conversations became dominated by whites
173as men and this was the result and I I
174think that's very telling and this is
175not to say that there's something
176inherent in six white men people are
177thinking that I'm saying a white male
178bad bad bad bad no there's nothing in
179hearing most of my best comrades are the
180most fiercely compassionate empathetic
181humble deeply humble this white dudes
182right like there's there's nothing
183inherent in a person that would make
184them behave this way but people have
185been socialized in certain ways and we
186need to actually unlearn this stuff
187there's so much that we have to
188consciously consciously unlearn if we're
189going to come into these spaces and work
190together to build a better future
191another great example that I have is
192that absolutely zero women have come to
193me and said hey your characterization of
194capital our revolution as patriarchal is
195offensive to me as a revolutionary woman
196I did have non men non-binary people say
197that you know the the language I was
198using like phallic and birthing was not
199great because that erases their
200experience and I I'm completely
201apologize for that I don't want this to
202be a binary thing by and large it's been
203near
204a hundred percent white men who have
205come to me and said how dare you frame
206this capital our evolutionist
207patriarchal don't you know that there
208were women revolutionaries did you ever
209think of that hadn't crossed my mind
210thank you sir and we're gonna get more
211into this later but I mean first of all
212I think we're very much past the point
213of oh well if there's women
214participating that it can't possibly be
215patriarchal if we have a woman president
216it was for basically living in a
217matriarchy if there are people of color
218participating then it can't possibly be
219white supremacist or a colonial or
220Eurocentric but my biggest issue is that
221most of these sis men typically would
222come at me not from a position of
223humility and wonder and hey I'm curious
224why do you think that this framing is
225patriarchal I'd like to learn more and
226let's have an open dialogue about this
227it's listen you here's all the reasons
228that you're wrong and you need to be
229quiet you need to just shut up now I
230have many friends who are non men who
231are Marxist Leninist or trots or
232whatever and they may disagree with me
233but they would never come at me with
234that kind of a posturing they would
235never do that that is such a violent way
236of speaking to you another human and of
237engaging with them and from that
238standpoint you're not open to learning
239this isn't just an intellectual exercise
240all of these systems exist within us and
241they are perpetuated through us I am not
242perfect either I have internalized
243patriarchal norms and capitalist norms
244and settler colonial norms sometimes I
245get real pissed and I go off but we have
246to at least try to do better we all have
247so much conscious unlearning to do if
248we're going to actually build a
249community together that's going to build
250a radically different world and what I'm
251talking about with the power fantasies
252is the same we have to examine deeply
253what it is within us that is yearning
254for that stuff even jokingly and how
255that might be just up
256passion of the systems we have now so
257I'll start with regular our revolution
258and how I see potentially things playing
259out in Canada or in the West more
260broadly regular our revolution is when
261there is a revolutionary rupture that
262isn't one giant overthrow of the central
263government and then a replacement of
264that government it's a revolution that
265unfolds in stages and involves the
266coalescing of multiple smaller
267revolutionary activities and militant
268mass strikes and disruptions that on
269their own might not be considered
270revolutionary at all in my last video I
271had people saying you know the climate
272strike or mass protests or Food Not
273Bombs these are not revolutionary
274movements right they're people
275critiquing the yellow vests in France
276well that's not a revolutionary movement
277didn't didn't overthrow capitalism did
278it well no shit didn't know shit these
279aren't gonna overthrow capitalism but
280the deepening environmental crisis the
281austerity crisis crushing people making
282life unlivable Automation increasing
283putting people out of work I mean there
284are going to be so many resistance
285movements and people getting fed up and
286that all of that together coupled with
287the fact that capitalism is eating
288itself I think will coalesce to force a
289revolutionary change in Canada for
290example it's getting far too expensive
291for people to actually make a living in
292the cities and so the big cities and so
293Millennials and Zoomers are increasingly
294moving out into the countryside this is
295significant because currently most
296leftists and left-of-centre people
297Social Democrats etc are concentrated in
298the cities as well depending on how bad
299things get and how the discourse shifts
300you be I could potentially be on the
301horizon and people are also saying that
302okay well if you we all have ubi then
303that will make it easier for people to
304move out a bit away from the city and
305start to build communities that will be
306a bit more self-sufficient I mean
307Millennials already think that they will
308die before they retire or they don't
309even play
310for retirement they're planning to join
311a commune when they get of age to retire
312right and I have lots of friends who are
313in rural Ontario where people are
314actually self-organizing a lot of things
315just out of necessity but they happen to
316be quite reactionary not my friends
317personally but the rural areas tend to
318be a lot more conservative a lot more
319libertarian a lot more fascist so yeah
320what's that going to mean for organizing
321going forward how are we going to
322organize in these rural areas we should
323be focusing on that especially if we
324can't actually make our livings in the
325city anymore and also because food
326security is going to be a very pressing
327issue in the coming climate crisis and
328most of the food that we get is coming
329from the countryside that's getting
330increasingly more fascist so what are we
331doing about that this will make urban
332food security and re commenting the land
333that much more important in cities as
334well for people who do stay so this will
335all create opportunities and challenges
336it'll create opportunities to
337potentially start building communities
338that are more self-reliant and are able
339to meet people's needs outside of the
340state and outside of capital and it also
341presents a number of challenges in terms
342of okay well how do we reckon with the
343fact that all of this land that we might
344be building community on is stolen land
345how do we decolonize the environmental
346crisis is also making people riot and
347just get a lot more militant and I think
348that we will see a ramping up of
349blockades and just people doing whatever
350possible to make these industries
351unprofitable workers are already seizing
352the means of their own workplaces and
353turning them into renewable energy
354factories this is awesome and this will
355contribute to our ability to meet
356people's needs outside of the state and
357outside of capital some people are
358saying also you know the rich once they
359automate production they don't
360necessarily need consumers even they can
361just use the robots to create whatever
362they want they can just harvest natural
363resources and create whatever wealth
364they want they don't even really need
365workers so maybe our clash with the
366capitalists and the stay will look
367different than it has in the past maybe
368by the time we do clash with the state
369it will be much weaker
370and maybe actually people in the
371military or the police will look around
372and say hey everyone has come together
373and has done a pretty good job building
374this new society that looks a lot better
375than what the state and capital is
376offering so maybe I refuse to shoot
377unarmed civilians who have done nothing
378wrong maybe not probably not we're
379probably like how many times do I have
380to repeat in my video that things will
381likely not be nonviolent
382when I say defense community defense
383against a militaristic state I don't see
384how people thought that I was saying
385that this would be passive and
386nonviolent and that we shouldn't
387actually defend ourselves from being
388killed but where is our focus is it
389unconsciously building what we want
390while striking and disrupting and
391defending what we're co-creating
392together or is it on a singular violent
393upheaval look people in the West are
394relatively comfortable non-violence is a
395privilege but it's a privilege most
396people here have enjoyed their entire
397lives but I teach an environmental
398studies class and believe me everyone
399from across the political spectrum sees
400the writing on the wall they know this
401way of life is coming to an end and they
402are eager to plan and build what comes
403next we don't actually have to
404rehabilitate images of Stalin or even
405Lenin to get people on board all we have
406to do is convince them that change is
407coming and let's get out ahead of this
408and build the world that we want to take
409care of us all it will be way easier to
410get people here excited and energized
411about building the new then it will by
412telling them yeah come with us and get
413organized into a militia with the
414ultimate goal of violently usurping the
415state the state that happens to be
416directly adjacent to the most powerful
417military the world has ever seen I'm
418sorry but the days of a scrappy vanguard
419taking their muskets into battle are
420over so that's a regular our revolution
421in my opinion and to me I think that's
422very plausible
423the coming decades and I think it's
424actually very desirable more desirable
425to me than a capital our revolution
426because we're actually building the
427world that we want to live in and then
428defending that world we'll be building a
429world that is not patriarchal hopefully
430and that focuses on restorative instead
431of carceral justice from the get-go i
432mean in in another podcast that we had
433ash on the podcast i actually said that
434you know people always say you can
435imagine the end of the world before you
436can imagine the end of capitalism or
437mark fisher said that or a lot of people
438have said that but i actually I can
439imagine I can imagine the end of the
440world and I can imagine the end of
441capitalism before the end of patriarchy
442I think that's a very very important so
443I'm gonna talk now about capital our
444revolution and how this framing of
445social change can remain patriarchal now
446please wait people are gonna get their
447backs up a lot when I start talking
448about this so please wait to hear the
449subsequent paragraph after I explain
450because I am NOT throwing anyone under
451the bus I am in fact celebrating them
452this is what I avoided saying last time
453I guess I'll be more explicit about it
454now and you want to know why I avoided
455saying it because I'm deeply
456uncomfortable and we've created a
457situation where people can't talk about
458this without being decried as not a real
459leftist and just a baby
460and an idealist and a liberal so a
461capital our revolution to me is one
462where there is a vanguard party that
463organizes the masses potentially to meet
464people's needs in the here and now but
465very often will decry that most things
466are not revolutionary and not the main
467goal the main goal is overthrowing the
468government so this party organizes the
469workers to overthrow the government and
470then sets themselves up in that
471government that seat of power but you
472know whatever it's it's democratic
473because everyone is participating all
474the way down and then they subsequently
475centralize create
476you know central planning and maintain a
477police and military force in order to
478crush dissidents and revisionists lest
479they rise up and destroy the revolution
480now hold on am i throwing every
481revolution that went down like this
482under the bus what about Cuba I thought
483you loved Cuba and you went there all
484the time and you loved che I thought you
485loved Thomas Sankara yes and I mean yes
486no I'm not throwing anyone or any of
487these revolutions under the bus these
488were all miraculous feats of their time
489people were able to come together and do
490this under the material conditions of
491their time and it wasn't just one
492authoritarian leader that was forcing
493everyone to do everything there were
494masses of people behind these things and
495they achieved a lot of great stuff for
496people working people and women
497participated and subsequently they often
498saw their rights and standing rise as
499well wonderful I am NOT throwing anyone
500under the bus who has earnestly engaged
501in revolutionary struggle that is not
502the point of my videos on this my point
503is to actually get us to dive deeper
504into these things and question some of
505the underlying assumptions so I have
506never been convinced that this is the
507route to full communism I have never
508been convinced that this is the route to
509smashing patriarchy indeed I think
510patriarchy lives on and it is kind of
511patriarchal and I am not convinced I've
512never been convinced that we would
513actually be taking on the US military
514head-on which is basically what we would
515have to do in the West I absolutely love
516the work that is left is doing to
517actually reach out to active service
518members active military members and
519former members
520and you know radicalize them and
521organize them that is awesome that is
522great work and I really believe that we
523need to do the most anti imperialist
524action that we can in order to give
525other countries some breathing room to
526potentially develop their alternative
527systems that's very important
528but this capital our revolution that
529that's not where I'm going to be putting
530my energy because my end goal is a
531decolonized reciprocal full communism
532that's the goal that I'm marching
533towards and to be honest I've really
534just kind of taken the the theory of it
535at face value and thought that everyone
536who is arguing for this capital our
537revolution is doing so in the good faith
538assumption that this is the only this is
539a necessary transition phase between
540capitalism and full communism and you
541know I've spent a lot of time with very
542principled ml's who I love and respect
543deeply and I've asked them all about why
544they are convinced about this I am not
545convinced I am yet to be convinced and
546to be very frank I think it would be
547better if some people would just admit
548that their end goal their end goal is
549the centralized state with the socialist
550military and the socialist police and in
551central planning not as the transition
552phase between that and full communism
553but as the final resting place framing
554the revolution this way makes it out to
555be yet another war game and a grab for
556power with the assumption that with the
557bad guys gone and the good guys in
558charge
559everyone will be liberated it requires a
560group of leaders with advanced
561ideological purity that based on
562comments from my last video has
563absolutely no time for indigenous wisdom
564or feminist theory or anything that
565isn't in line with the science of
566overthrow Lin carceral punishment and
567even if women obtain more rights and
568even take on more leadership
569paroles I don't see this necessarily as
570a major break from patriarchal modes of
571governance and in that case if you're
572thinking about a settler state like
573Canada then you're basically throwing
574decolonization out the window and you
575know that that's just not possible and
576that's not a goal for you so you know if
577people were honest about that then okay
578we're fighting for different things we
579don't want the same thing and if that's
580your end goal then it makes perfect
581sense
582that you're gonna spend your time trying
583to create a critical mass and look into
584military training and whatever is needed
585to overthrow a government and install a
586new one and keep it there have it there
587to perpetuate itself and not actually
588dissolve I mean our entire history is
589just marked by men playing war games so
590you will have to excuse me if I don't
591feel excited and hopeful and you know
592thrilled about a bunch of I mean I can't
593even say it's just young men who are
594doing this but you know what I'm saying
595like a bunch of dudes with guns saying
596hey join me we're gonna liberate you and
597if you do honestly think that this is
598the most advanced stage that's gonna get
599us the closest to full communism and
600that it will eventually happen that's
601fine I'm not convinced I respect that
602you think that and I don't know that
603you're wrong you might be absolutely
604right but what I'm asking for is the
605humility for you to say that you also
606don't know that you're necessarily going
607to be right about that right we're all
608making educated guesses this is what I
609mean about you know yes we have a lot of
610theories from the past but there's
611theories and we haven't seen the result
612and I think that any form of society
613that doesn't get rid of other and and
614question people's need to other and
615where that comes from and dominance and
616a society that doesn't actually foster
617just from the smallest most fractal
618level radically different compassionate
619way
620of engaging with one another in building
621community I don't think that's going to
622bring really radical change to the way
623that we live together I don't have all
624the answers but I am going to be
625building what it is that I want to see
626and I'm going to be doing that by
627listening to people who don't look like
628me who don't live like me and figuring
629out how we can go forward together in an
630anti oppressive way because look like
631militancy and violence are not
632inherently male and the opposite
633inherently female but if non men and
634indigenous people are uncomfortable with
635the actions that you're organizing then
636you should probably listen to them and
637find out why and find out how you can
638maybe try to make your organizing and
639your strategizing more inclusive and
640more welcoming to people instead of just
641making fun of them and dismissing them
642and saying we don't have time for this
643shit and this is another thing you know
644people who are like oh well my
645organization has all these women and all
646these people of color sure but are you
647creating a space where all women and all
648people of color and all marginalized
649folks can come to the table and express
650whatever opinions they want or are you
651only creating seats at the table for
652women and people of color and whatever
653who buy your dogma and who would not
654speak up and say anything to contradict
655it is there room at your table for women
656or people of color or whoever who are
657saying things similar to what I'm saying
658or would you laugh them and humiliate
659and shame them out of the room so here I
660want to get into reciprocity indigenous
661leadership and the idea of needing to
662reduce our material throughput and
663charges of primitivism so I'm gonna
664actually start with analyzing science
665and materialism first materialism is
666analyzing the material conditions
667whatever time you're talking about and
668how those conditions lead to social
669behavior and social change how they
670drive social change materialist analysis
671is what I do for a living which is why I
672said historical materialism can be
673predictive in certain cases but not
674always if we haven't seen the results
675that we're trying to achieve materialism
676is not whatever certain theorist said
677about material conditions of their time
678a hundred years ago
679somehow the word materialism has gotten
680attached to whatever Lenin said or
681whatever Stalin said or whatever whoever
682said and that's materialism and that's
683scientific going back to the Orientalism
684slide the scientific has historically
685been used as a tool of colonialism and
686it's a tool of patriarchy and white
687supremacy appeals to science were
688historically appeals to Authority and
689patriarchal and white supremacist
690authority as Haraway talks about in her
691book so am i against science no I am out
692here all the time talking about the
693importance of climate science etc it's
694just that when the social sciences or
695the humanities or whatever feel the need
696to make these grand appeals to science
697Objectivist science these are just
698thinly veiled appeals to Authority and
699rationality and the rationale has always
700been coded as masculine as well the
701rational and the scientific has always
702been in contrast to this pseudo
703scientific and the emotional and the
704spiritual crap of women and indigenous
705people and people from other cultures so
706you know I'm sorry but none of you are
707doing science more than I am doing
708science and coming out and telling
709people you know what I'm doing is
710science what you're doing is not science
711and we all trust science right you'd
712have to be deaf to go against science so
713therefore my position is superior it
714honestly makes my head
715spin like what are you talking about
716like the patriarchal toxically masculine
717way of interacting with things like this
718is to never admit that you're wrong or
719you might be wrong never admit your
720mistakes never admit your weakness like
721that no no I am science man and you are
722emotional ridiculous woman and I think
723honestly this is why a lot of sis men
724have come to me and said thank you for
725saying this because I feel so
726uncomfortable trying to talk about these
727things in these spaces because all of
728these patriarchal undertones are just
729baked right in right like you don't want
730to be the person saying these things
731that are coded as feminine and emotional
732an idealist and not scientific and not
733materialist and again going back to this
734dichotomy in this system you're
735eccentric visions of Technology and
736progress and this linear vision of
737progress goes hand-in-hand with white
738man's burden and this goes hand in hand
739with discounting complex developed
740intentional indigenous governance
741systems and land management as backwards
742in primitive and useless I mean let's
743face it all of our leftist theory is
744Eurocentric because it was written by
745Europeans who were living under
746capitalism even if you take the position
747that colonialism and capitalism were
748good actually because they advanced the
749material conditions which is the
750necessary precondition for socialism
751which first of all yikes
752how can you think that that is not
753Eurocentric when there were several
754several indigenous nations that were
755already living in governance systems
756that more closely resemble socialism or
757anarchism before we came in and stomped
758them out even if you think conditions
759are better to live in today or in our
760capital society than they were in
761indigenous nations back then can you not
762still see the incredible importance of
763challenging Eurocentric and linear
764visions of progress and development
765especially since all of that
766and development has led us to the
767catastrophe that we're in today as I
768said technology and living and
769reciprocity with nature are not
770incommensurable but technology in
771service of reciprocity is far different
772than technology in service of production
773and progress replacing one linear
774unsustainable system ie capitalism with
775yet another linear system based on a
776linear your eccentric vision of progress
777is not going to lead to a sustainable
778post-scarcity future the opposite of
779that linear system would be a circle
780circular economies circular ways of
781living reciprocity if everyone were to
782live as we live in the West we would
783need at least six Earth's centralizing
784everything and creating a centralized
785economy based on need yeah that's gonna
786help but if we're not radically
787reevaluating what it is that we mean by
788need in the West I do not see that
789number that number of earths dropping to
790just one earth or less than one earth
791frankly and I feel like a lot of
792people's aversion to the idea of needing
793to reduce our material output is also
794rooted in the fact that we've been
795colonized by capitalism as Ashe and John
796on the horror Vanguard said sorry sorry
797hey guys sorry two three order the bus
798also but they said that everyone
799everyone in the society is libidinal II
800invested in the spoils of capitalism we
801are all invested and we don't want to
802give it up and that's why we're in the
803mess that we're in today because people
804in the West don't want to give up
805anything about the way that they're
806living saying that we won't have to give
807up anything about the way that we're
808living now or heckley radically
809reimagine it
810is I think living in denial and I think
811that posturing or that framing of the
812issue will not lead us to actually take
813the steps to do what is necessary to
814create a sustainable future in which
815everyone can flourish and yes I mean
816Western science for this to there's no
817going back in braiding sweetgrass she
818talks about this perfectly and elder
819Albert Marshall actually coined the term
820two-eyed seeing to talk about the
821weaving of indigenous knowledge and
822Western science in ways that don't
823prioritize one over the other and don't
824devalue one over the other this is so
825important and by the way if you think
826that indigenous knowledge and land
827management have nothing to teach us for
828sustainability going forward you have a
829lot of reading to do in the fields of
830conservation biology and climate science
831and so I I invite everyone to read more
832broadly read post-colonial Theory read
833indigenous Theory read feminist theory
834get in touch with all of this stuff
835because we can't just have another dry
836you know militaristic overthrow and
837expect that that's going to lead us to
838where we need to be especially in the
839West I don't see it happening so I hope
840that what I've said here is more more
841clear and look if the capital r
842revolution is popping off you know that
843i will be there but i will be majorly
844side-eyeing especially when it comes to
845whatever comes next
846special thanks once again to tristan
847from step back for editing this video
848check him out special thanks to my
849patrons now i could not do this without
850you thank you for your support special
851shout out to florian franc shuffle olga
852robert choi Jigglypuff ur autumn kay and
853Jennifer you check out my podcast at
854vegan vanguard podcast com like share
855comment subscribe and I will see you in
856another video