UmRdfmUB

1Concepts to percepts: How we think in Ontological Mathematics (The Soulblaze Series)
2
3
4
5
6To fully understand the logical contents of this book, you’ll need to read The God Series by Mike Hockney and The Truth Series by Dr. Thomas Stark.
7
8This book is the only book in human history which is claiming an angel has appeared in spirit, via music, to clearly and spiritually guide a modern human being in some act.
9
10
11
12Quotes -
13
14“I step with the god in me” - James Walton
15
16“Keep cool and you command everybody” - Louis Antoine de Saint-Just
17
18“There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them.”  - Bruce Lee
19
20“Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.” - Benjamin Franklin
21
22“Cause I'll rip the mic, rip the stage, rip the system, I was born to rage against 'em”  - Zack de la Rocha 
23
24“The sparrows never know the ambitions of the swans!” - Koichi Kawato
25
26"I love the twinkling eyes of the people who are working hard towards a dream. I want to develop those kinds of students. So I won't quit."  - Koichi Kawato
27
28"Use your teachers for all they're worth! That's what school's for!" - Koichi Kawato
29
30“Flutter into your dreams, glitter into tomorrow.”  - Koichi Kawato
31
32"Heart is valuable" - Isaac Netero
33
34“A prayer comes from the heart.” - Isaac Netero
35
36"Don't cry for me. I go where music is born." - Bach
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44The whole point of consciousness is that we move away from thinking whatsoever in terms of the senses and spatiotemporal details. We take spatiotemporal cues but we do not suspend ourselves in the thinking of how peoples’ heads and bodies move in multitude and the like. This is the new model for future consciousness. You don’t think about Phenomena Only to reach conceptual clarity, but on the other hand you have to individuate the exact precise general form of how, descriptively, by definition, your mind weaves and bobs in and out of the layers of percepts (sinusoids!) automatically (unconsciously) in order to pick up (select; hook in) the right things routinely. This is superoptimizing the unconscious, and we do it just as it’s achieved in computer programming: we traverse the different levels of conception and piecemeal conceptual “contents” in branches, being free to conceptually intuitively “see” what each individual functional component does (via a dialectic and the general Selector Function being imposed) and we commit changes in accordance with what we’ve grasped should be the answer. All of this happens unconsciously and without having any sort of conceptual visual mind space to do it in. The ability to do this comes built into existence, just as other types of thought in any domain of life would be insufficiently privileged: the only actual distinguishing factor for any concept or conceptualization, is how to analytically get there. That’s what “defines” a contingent concept or a contingent mental expression. Expressions themselves do not and cannot have identities, unique identifiers or identification, or anything of the sort. Mathematics is strictly “anonymous”. You don’t need to keep tabs on thought piecemeal expressions in the way that you don’t need to buy oxygen because you have a means to get it out of an otherwise generally available mechanism. More accurately, however, we would say that thoughts don’t have any necessary existence but the appropriate environmental contexts they are selected in – as soon as you encounter a scenario pressing you for your solutions, you will be able to reformulate them and not otherwise. You cannot make yourself do something before it would be required. That is because conception (interaction between monads) operates at incredibly macroscopic, large, broad mathematical extents of conceptual extension between unknown, unprovidable middlemen processes (like bodies), and only angels have full fit knowledge of what these processes are and how they operate in detail.
45
46How the right brain appreciates god is how conception is organized and ranged to reflect ancient backported terms (such as how we love ourselves through our dreams, Others, ideals and memories we meet i.e. the things which specifically analytically interpenetrate us). How the left brain appreciates god is the degree and style of interpenetration (god from within its window into itself, which is hence analytically found not as holism but as localism always, from another domain). God is strictly and analytically precisely how god interpenetrates itself at the point of conception (i.e. how god finds its path home). This must analytically be commensurate with the Riemann Sphere math and this must be reversibly conceptually compatible(!) and this must be analytically how holism is determinable holistically from holism with no other penetration, conceptually speaking;- that is to say, closing up conception itself purely and entirely analytically, as a conceptual and Wholly a conceptual and thus (Nothingly/Zero) a conceptual understanding. Everything in/across this conception now equals Zero, and this must be en eternal truism (Equation) under the aspect of eternity. Also, this quality must itself (a conditionality) be a parallellizable quality capable of being rendered, ranged, scoped or faced over the general conditions of other nonzero conditionality in other monads (it must itself be pronouncible and pointable in parallell supersymmetrical terms, towards other circumstances facing outwards in parallellism from the common reference point of such a type of supergeneralized superprecise parallellism).
47
48This is how god is categorically able to solve any possible problem;- its pure prime Conception necessarily reflects how to analytically resolve all other phenomenally observable current observable/phenomenal forms, via the sinusoids’ configuration in the monad. This is analytically and precisely and symmetrically how the Big Bang must always move to the Big Crunch as more and more monads become generally generalized (as opposed to phenomenally facing all the actions, expressible mathematical analytical models (“discussion”) of other monads across the Monadic Collective). Matter and percept are removed from the equation where we have properly generally swept God (analytically in the general, most conceptual sense reducible to noumenal circumstance of the most general i.e. parallel kind we encounter or interpenetrate [Self vs. Other/God/World]). Q.E.D. Quod erat demonstrandum.
49
50(This is analytically and strictly how, also, words not only retain their meaning but sinusoidally become generalized in expression as we individuate via content. Individuation is thus both particular/individual and parallel. It is itself a parallel truism, expressible as a concept.)
51
52Everything is conceptual and based on the interaction of immortal minds in Riemennian space. Where does one thing (target and goal and agenda) begin, or end? It categorically never starts or stops cleanly with no breaks, because reality has no gaps! It’s mathematical and conceptual. To remain in expressive interaction with one another, all minds must be formulating a conceptual collapse which renders a net result of zero. The conception, in other words, of full enclosing reality, must circumnavigate zero and it must be totally invariably predicated on zero (or infinity, which is expressibly zero from its opposite clean pole, where the conception has been fully wrapped and completed of highest possible order). That’s what spacetime interference is: that’s how we are doing it. Spacetime, to an angel, isn’t actually “spacetime” as we conceptualize at all but it’s something of an “inbuilt mental mediator”, you might say – just as humans now recognize cars as “inbuilt mental mediators” conceptually; or their legs or genitals as conceptual mathematical mediators between one thing and the (contingently conceptually higher-elevated) target conceptual order/process, and the output;- that is to say, one thing is extensional to another, which is to say, things are sinusoidally interrelated in parallel in their essential sense. All things must be of this form, and if many are, then none are otherwise and none can be otherwise. You can’t draw from out of existence. That is categorically not so. Relationships are inbuilt mental mediators; anything you fully understand is an inbuilt mental mediator (a function!). You enclose and enfold things into your conception. Anything like “love”, “intelligence”, “capability” – all “megaconcepts” – they start to become better effective bridging functions between “the primary issue in itself” and the contingency, i.e. between themselves and all others, i.e. the component and the contingency; the cause and the effect; the concave and the convex; the target or outline and the goal; the plan and the action; the form and the contents; and so on. This must all come of a most highly particularized, protracted form essentially and fully specific (tailored) to that particular phenomenal and noumenal activity of that universe-cycle. The principal reason why we can exist in noumenal mind space as well as “meatspace” is that sinusoidal parallel activity (parallellism of definition which may or may not be defining symmetry across any sampling, scope or range of such parallellized dimensionality) is that minds are emphatically not giving up over all of their thought space (their mind-space) towards material existence. In fact, this individuation at the noumenal sense is precisely the precondition around which life necessarily mathematically arranges itself on planets of higher life, for precisely this reason (this type of parallellism). This is infact the secret behind how only some mental frequencies of lower accord can enter spacetime and others higher and out cannot. The chief principal reason for this would be, of course, that any relationally e(n)ternally reincarnationally unconscious mechanism would naturally arrange and occur and order itself most consistently-reliably around the shared lateral point of zero in the Riemann Sphere. This is the “Genesis Point”, the common local point of convergence in reincarnational universes; with the Omega Point definitionally and categorically being analytically unique and uniquely found and resolved for each universe instance – upon which, a symmetry breakage occurs in all monads, and the convergence point is found again. Since the Riemann Sphere is convertible in all dimensions and aspects (as language and underlying sinusoidal mass-parallel multidimensional patterns must be in any true ontological mathematical Riemennian universe), the Genesis Point may always infact be the preceding Omega Point, the narrowed unilateral and also multilateral point of parallellism convergence for all unit monads of all stripes within laterality or parallellism; with the universe seen to constantly shift and bound about a “strictly absolutely reference-locked” framed-of-reference Riemennian Sphere. This, categorically, is not even possible which is why it is definitionally and conceptually impossible to conceive of the last universe, or indeed, the origin of the creation of the universe sitting conditionally or contingently within a frame of reference of linear chained causational differentiatiable energy. Categorically, such things emphatically cannot exist in a universe which has wholly and truthfully and completely definitionally recast itself and its total scopes of contingent possible frames of reference (framing) across all of the entire sweep of the objective such universe.
53
54God is where concepts go to die and reformulate. God reshuffles itself, dying and creating itself again, over and over, obscuring any possible reference frame (conception, conditionality, penetration form) outside of this whole monadic array of superstructure. The concept itself is part of the expressed contents (the contingent existence, which is the same as to say, the contingent existents). Since concepts are irreducibly and undeniably formed from mental “contents” – which is really to say, raw expressibility of massively parallel sinusoidal forms all each based on points around a circle, and exchanging in the ultimate sense analogies about wrapping parallells around a Euler Circle reference space – Concept itself and Conception itself goes to die and rebirth. Such is the untellable story of god, which can only ever be communicated and communed by parallel public analogies (stories, mythos, logos, intuitions, convergent truths, truths of life).
55
56The trick with eternity’s conditionality on the zeroing of curiosity (entropy versus negentropy and how they are encapsulated along cleanly with everything else) is that eternity is at once being compared as an reference-frame which expands past The Big Bang, and in another sense being compared in the truest most highest conceptual (contingent!) reference-frame which is subjectively (i.e. differently now) arrived-at by that particular unit monad in question making this framed judgement. The two cannot be compared informationally because this constitutes what we might call a categorical error or category error – but as always, this is only actually a definitional, informational limit of subjectivity being expressed. God simply is defined within contingency (as is the world appears around us) and none elsewise. This has cause by the breakage of god (symmetry of totality of contingent frame of reference which is phenomenally or noumenally or consciously to be held/help up). This is because mathematics is eternal and eternally expressibly can only define certain particulars of information (ranged across infinite capacity of definitional conceptual expression in each case: infinite sinusoids). This spells all the curiosities about god; all the broad-band, eternal mysteries and prime chief concerns about existence (because they are expressed definitionally and contingently, in the eternal immortal categorical sense). This is exactly and precisely why angels and gods are so mathematically removed from bodies, existence, and the cares of human conditions and conditionalities generally speaking (they have literally ontologically “ghosted out of existence”). All gods and angels are leaving the noumenal plains of existence; the mirrored straits and terrain of parallel symmetrical existence dimensionality (the Elves’ travel to some end of the world depicted in The Lord of the Rings); they are casting and writing themselves out of existence. They are divorcing themselves from mathematical interactional patterns of dissonance and disruption patterns, to definitionally thereby be more free and escaped. Angels and gods are scoping themselves out of existence consciously. This is because it comes with the conception of foundationally clearer thinking and higher rational power; High Concept; high conception.
57
58With this comes doubled-up the qualities of;- 1) You can have as many friends and as many divine experiences of clear shared rational conception as you want; 2) everyone around you is on the same page; 3) you can think and manipulate matter in private dreamworlds and shared angel dreamworlds of any form; 4) you never have to work or lift a finger again for a false cause; 5) you are totally principally and necessarily free from other minds interfering with your plans and your life and your mind (your conception); 6) you are fully bound with all the mental tooling and rational capacity to act as so and as such to guide other souls via coded rotated parallellisms and via rare interventions in order to coordinate the most rational and rationally beneficial, stable and likely unfolding of divine prominence.
59
60Wavefunction collapse (of infinitely arrayed points moving around a Euler circle) happens over a “wavefunction collapse boundary” precisely because it’s based and derived in moving floating points and motion, not a strictly logically coordinated decision-tree. This is the answer to why some souls (angels) can inject their contents faster into the wavefunction collapse! Being a “tiny soul”; reducing yourself in needs via individuation; is infact the due and responsible process for manipulating matter! You couldn’t make it up!
61
62The closer your major grouping of infinite points (sinusoids) are configured towarads the Genesis Point (in general), the more generalized ability you have to solve problems of that ontological domain or category (just as circles, via the Floating Point and the PSR, allow us to get closer in spacetime dimensionalities (i.e. each one brings us closer in this virtual parallel space) to solve the general (“full-flat”) problems of that ontological category, or domain. This is precisely why souls must converge and constellate in certain shapes around a common point of reference (across many sinusoids of dimensionality of the essential general purpose) in order to achieve this. This is evident in every single mathematical transformation that is ever made and done (because I must cross a locus focus point of control). This thus allows us to “trace” and “sweep” for the general categories most afforded by the most general groupings (or constellations) of the infinite sinusoidal set. Circles definitionally and categorically must have use; must have a locus of “tour de force”, to be doing things in our universe constantly all the time. The thing about general knowedge is it constellates wherever your sinusoids go with it. This is patently because you have learned the “strategies of the infinite” over a very very long age of time in order as best necessarily contingently do this. Note the clear analog here with different bodies; different nations; all working under one godlike “thumb” of control that doesn’t tend to destabilize in its essential parameters. This is why the universe is generally stable rather than a chaos. It is holistically stable and locally provisional.
63
64Individuation works as you expose yourself. You have to let loose and run wild, and totally admit things and engage in complete radical self-acceptance (say the things you really wanted out loud; knowing you can then work away and around from it in thinking more about how to solve and tie these ends together). Individuation works as you (god) expose(s) yourself/itself.
65
66
67
68
69
70In the new Stark book (The Stairway to Consciousness) there is a small error right at the end. It says there's no text content to read in dreams, this is false and you will find records of people reading signs and text in their dreams, as well as having full conversations with people. It is possible to talk using your Higher Self persona/mask for example, during dreams. It is possible to read text and the brand names and labels on things (without achieving lucidity) and I have dream records of this. Sometimes the text will move like it's volatile/transient, as the unconscious is forming something anew creatively.
71
72It is just simply possible, because either the right brain has learned and taken on the capabilities, or it's a lot of corpus callosum activity. There is nothing to prevent it. The unconscious has access to archetypes and scene-setting strategies, but it depends more on the higher-level conceptual taskmaking, as all our thought and language and creation does in the ultimate act. When the transcendental dreams come in, then of course you have access to more creative options. More can be brought in. It comes with the territory, in much the same way as we are more open to talking about something that pulls in and brings together what we want to talk about, or the full range of interesting aspects of life.
73
74In dreams you can read text written down, but it will usually have a symbolic purpose. In one dream, the woman I dated left a note for me pinned to a mirror, it was a literally read message but something clearly intended for me to pay attention to, it was in reality a response from my Higher Self, hence a need conceptually to create such a mechanism. Conceptual thinkers (by extension, gods) can do whatever they want. Gods, angels, higher humanity - we only act with sufficient cause. The more rational you get, the more collected and measured you are. Why would our dreams be any different? We are as aggressively and uncompromisingly authentic with ourselves in our Higher Self dreams, as we are with ourselves with the truth of the world and maintaining our rational response to it.
75
76People in our dreams can walk outside, hail a taxi, and so on, so why not write? When we weave dreams we are conceptually constructing and flattening the delivery of it that we want to achieve, so since there's no just cause for someone writing something out, it's placed as part of the setting and scenario along with rotated symbolism to hammer home some relational significance (exactly like how movies and TV has the characters refer to things that supposedly happened previously). It's all in the method, the delivery, the format. In that is beauty; optimization. All the very best stories have the indescribable quality, and so do the best books; it's about a highest synthesis, minimal wasted time; delivery.
77
78Some dreams can have you interact with stand-in figures for societal purposes and functions, doing full lengthy conversations. You might go on a tirade about meritocracy and politics. It depends what your mind wants to do. A mind that prizes clear protracted thought may well go on to use that in dreams as it's trying to individuate.
79
80I remember this new book also mentioned the "true mother / double mother" thing. I remembered my dream journal actually has one of those. In it was some verbal messages "she" gave to me, and of course, the dream also included visually picking through some letters in a drawer at an old house. The text can be more conceptual or it can be highly visually vivid and distinct. If you have had the kind of vivid dreams (or hypnagogia) where the detail is incredibly rich, then this shouldn't sound so far off the mark.
81
82It is indeed possible to hear a booming, intimidating bicameral voice inside a dream (I had one where I was being chased by a fox because it wanted to unseat my shadow side, and it talked to me in a booming voice which was distinctly primordial and highly limited in the kinds of things it could say/convey). Some dreams (like the ones where you run simulations of people you know) can have the archetypal influence with a smattering of words, but in dreams our minds themselves can do expository/explanatory dialogue, and dream characters may ask questions or have some kind of response prompting something further. It must be that in some dreams, the right brain decides to take more control over the left brain, and/or there is some level of crisis of consciousness that permits this shift to happen relating to life stresses and individuation! What other explanation is there? Confronting The Shadow must have its own dream patterns, hence it must be its own subcategory of dreaming.
83
84Lucid dreaming is a different thing in the sense that lucid dreamers may be able to more freely talk to their simulations of people. I never achieved much more than moments of lucidity though.
85
86Other left brain functionality like simulating flying is also possible, which is interesting to note. And of course, in lucid dreams when we become lucid, we can try to imagine moving our body around the room.
87
88In normal dreams, there isn't much cause for left brain activity but in the more purposeful dreaming, we would naturally come to call upon the full range of mental activities, just as we do when writing which is another form of creation in the unconscious.
89
90
91
92https://old.reddit.com/r/Dreams/search?q=read+text&restrict_sr=on&sort=relevance&t=all
93
94Seeing text in particular is partially the interplay of our unconscious habits, i.e. how our unconscious habits actually mathematically work. Deep in the Personal Unconscious is all our Selector Function work; the processes and habitual conceptual thinking constructs that we use to hammer out our responses. These things are highly particular, highly detailed. In there, some things in this life are far more pronounced than they used to be. Our Personal Unconscious math from waking life is being intermixed with the dream version of our unconscious mental activity. The mind is rolling along piecing together bits of narrative in an impressive mirage. All the aspects, like our Id versus Superego drives, are mathematically present in this act (how could they not be? What do we dream about that is not from our Personal Unconscious and its character?) I just remembered that one of my transcendental dreams decided to take a highly right brained approach with text; it was a dream playing off the themes from the Kingsman movies (i.e. I was a character involved with that kind of mission in the dream and I eventually shot someone), and a nightclub had a sign above the entrance in big capital letters saying "DOMINATE". It was a transcendental dream, so of course in-context this actually meant something very special to do with my Higher Self. That's why the dream used text. It is about higher synthesis of content.
95
96I never had any lengthy two-way conversations with anyone in a dream, but of course I did speak a lot to people within non-lucid dreams. If you were the type of person to practice making youtube videos as if to an audience, for years, then you may have different types of dreams because your persona would be different. It's all in the Personal Unconscious and its math. It's to do with how the mind, and consciousness, is totally mathematically open to interpretation. It's about how we want to live on our own terms, by our authentically own experiences.
97
98" The basic question for the mind is always, “What next?” The human mind is full of automatic processes, instincts, intuitions, reflective processes, deliberative processes, unconscious processes, conscious reflection, gut feelings, emotions, desires, will, and so on. All of this has to be sifted, evaluated, made sense of, and, finally, acted upon. Sometimes, we may have a lot of time at our disposal to weigh our options. At other times, we may have to act almost instantly, with precious little time to consider our decision. No machine could ever emulate this degree of complexity and sophistication."
99
100    - Mike Hockney
101
102Firstly the right brain has a duty to fulfil which is weaving together a right brained framework of signs, symbols, symbolic meanings, archetypes and feelings and intuitions. It can't produce something without those, so it must work with something it understands (at this stage in The God Game). When we think of people making bad choices we would put otherwise, we can take in mind that we are asking them to make an impossible choice. The same is true of the right brain needing to remain in an unconscious archetypal framework. If the left brain is too active suddenly, then lucidity and dream narrative can break, becase the left brain will probe for logical consistency and contradictions. In future generations we will have all of this figured out, so we can be dream divers.
103
104
105" Left Brain
106
107Scientist, mathematician, logician.
108
109Categorization, accuracy, linearity, analysis, strategy, practicality, control, realism, mastery of words and language, calculation, equations, order, thinking, reason, rationalism, Apollonian.
110
111
112Right Brain
113
114Free Spirit, artist.
115
116Creativity, passion, yearning, sensuality, movement, vivid colours, imagination, art, poetry, sensing, feeling, Dionysian.
117
118The optimal world belongs to both Apollo and Dionysus, not to one or the other. And we need female balance too. Sophia (wisdom) is Apollo’s counterpart, and Aphrodite is Dionysus’s.
119
120Autistics are extremely linear. They can do only one thing at a time. They are amazed by the ability of “norms” to multi-task.
121
122Women are often said to be much better at multi-tasking than men, who are often said to be overly linear in their approach. Autism is often described as an “extreme male brain” condition."
123
124    - Mike Hockney
125
126
127Obviously we can't teach the unconscious right brain reason right now; can we look at some inspiring mathematical patterns? Archetypal music from highly archetypally charged stories we like? We can try to inspire the right brain but nothing disingenuous would ever work. We know this from our own purity of self in our most transcendental dreams and from the creative and thought acts we go onto do anyway (even within the same day). Nothing "in bad faith" would work with trying to trick the unconscious into doing something for us. The Higher Self doesn't want to select suboptimal things ever, so this extends to what we're trying to play with in experiment with the unconscious. Our mind is to be used to consciously understand how things work on the whole, so that we can protract our efforts more effectively towards giving the unconscious.. well, what? What more? What more could we give, other than authentic individuation? There is a certain escape threshold where nothing but your real true life would ever be better right brain feed for transcendental dreams.. answer your own questions; formulate your own sharply rational conscious solution. That's what the angels would say.
128
129You can't just want to play around arbitrarily and wonder what could be. This is the domain of creative flop. In creativity you have to figure out how to get beyond the simply wishing stage, and move on into meaningful execution with a good degree of mental flow. This means you curb your Selector Function to bring in more meaningful information and constructs and mental content and materials to work with. That's a part of how creativity functions. Dreams are no different in this elemental sense of creativity being a response to a given contextual purpose and need. You don't arbitrarily create. Think of what an angel is, and how the opposite of an angel could be something like an animal. Angels offer solutions. They are thinking intuitives. Being a thinking intuitive means you understand that the meaning of life is here in the substance of your own soul..
130
131..And so it is with dreams. We are not going to shape our dreams by suggesting random words, like that recent neuroscience experiment. The dream-o-nautical exploration isn't something you approach from an extroverted or sensory angle; it's not that you'd create dreams based on purely the Id drive in itself (people recommend that method called dream incubation, where you write it and put it under your pillow); it's the domain of the Self and the psyche, since the Personal Unconscious is what's predominantly driving its creation. Dreaming is a living mystery using the archetypes and other mathematical processes that make up what we actually are; the character of our unconscious mind and how it is mathematically responding (selecting) in accordance with recent life events, etc.
132
133So if we want to get better dreams, then we have to know ourselves better - this will mean more introspection, more individuation, more visual and mythos-logos interlinking, more imagination, more rational spirituality, more grand visions for what the unlimited mind can be and can produce - you have to be seeking yourself, you have to be expanding your mind-space. Nothing else will help you in itself. The key to dreams is the holy grail. It hasn't somehow magically changed for your particular circumstances; nor is there any possibility of bending the nature of the mind for your purposes - because your purposes are the maximum expression of the god equation, and what you need to find in this truest capacity is individuation, symmetry, balance and so on.
134
135Our dreams reveal the unconscious right brain underbelly of our waking lives, and this has archetypal contents built into it, just as it is linked both in Collective Unconscious and Personal Unconscious terms. How we communicate with this dream side of ourselves is up to us. We can opt to interpret our dreams and intimately connect with the dream journal, or we can pretend they didn't happen. This again is a conscious and unconscious meta-reflection of what we have chosen to do. What drives dreams and calls the much more vivid ones into frequent occurrence? Is it simply discovering the true self? Is it being bolder and more adventurous? How would you qualify such highly subjective terms and concepts? We are in the business of generalizing our conceptual mental contents, and that's the way to go, as the angels archetypally point out for us.
136
137
138In a lecture, Chris Crawford differentiated between Incremental Creativity and Grand Leap Creativity. Which type are dreams? What about transcendental dreams?
139
140
141Consciousness: when a monad looks at itself in the world, it has all the workings to differentiate the mathematical percepts, to build concepts, to recognize its own authenticity of free will in a continuous feedback process. It's mathematically self-validating, conceptually. That's all there is to distinguish the conscious monad looking in the mirror, using a rented wavefunction body. The only confirmation of the existence of something made of concepts, is of course conceptual and based nowhere in spacetime and resting none whatever in spacetime. Numbers are all concepts. The uncaused cause perceives and conceives of itself. We can conceive of this whole process, looking down on it from another meta level, that of the thinking intuitive thinking about consciousness.
142
143
144
145
146
147In a video game, the avatar moves and the monad takes percepts from the environment to estimate. The actual controlling monad takes nothing from outside of the game content (the percepts) and its own sinusoids (the concepts), to be able to mathematically define its mathematical will. At no point does the concept betray ontological mathematics and somehow relocate itself into the spatiotemporal domain. The collapse of concept to percept is sinusoidal compounded thoughts (matter; percepts; the floating point; wave-particle duality). Concepts do not come to meet you as an empiricist. You must come to them.
148
149Minds learn to manipulate concepts, and conscious thought, and then eventually, we will learn as a divine community to manipulate matter for everyone. The Old World behaviours of today will be outmoded, and they will seem profoundly odd.
150
151Angels are patiently waiting for humanity to become divine, but they know it's impossible to rush it, given the many millions of dialectical latent workings needed to be achieved in all our minds. A collective gnosis is the ultimate project that eclipses everything we've ever tried to be. It radically redefines all those lines we drew up; it makes us revisit everything, and not without due course: due action, due dialectical revolutions of the world.
152
153Rationality is far more powerful than you ever imagined. They never told you gnosis would be so approachable, responsive, and profoundly proactive. The PSR is fully open for you to explore right now.
154
155In video games, 3d and 2d environments are accessed by mathematical extensions of zero-dimensional math, using math expressions in computer code (what do you think a screen cursor is?!). If we could inhabit a much smaller world, our sense of self couldn't come about. The spacetime domain is predicated on infinity and zero, and no other spatiotemporal domain would ever actually be possible. This is a shared mathematical interaction mechanism - imagine a cosmic blackboard - which the angels and gods have first dibs on. All the spatiotemporal percepts are derived from the well-defined conceptual math (perfect, immutable sinusoidal concepts; frequencies) which could never be "reproduced" out from anywhere other than perfect conceptual analytical mathematical conceptual existence.
156
157The world is built of perfect concepts; the perfect conceptual bricks and building blocks. Nothing other than this would ever actually function. Percepts cannot precede concepts, and a full set of sinusoids means that monads are multilaterally executing their version of The God Equation's contents. There is no such thing as a scientific random number generation to manufacture a randomly determining wavefunction collapse (or indeterminate, indeterministic wavefunction collapse).
158
159In software, random number generation uses things like the very precise local time to generate some content. Randomness can never precede anything, since it is always based on concepts! Random number generation is impossible, since it always must have conceptual form: it's a function! You are always taking something from somewhere and sampling something. A creator god could never sufficiently justify making one choice for one soul, and a different choice for another. We can present this in terms of favouritism, or we can go further and recognize that a monad literally cannot think for another monad (this is a category error). Monads, technically speaking, can only think for themselves. There is no possible selector function causation mechanism for the entire universe. Monads themselves always fill in all the detail within each wavefunction collapse.
160
161Plenty of hypothetical scenarios are simply badly formed reason. It's because we live in the Leibnizian PSR type reality (which is just a label which cannot exist or be otherwise promoted especially) that we can do this reasoning. Reason has this reflective property (we can also call it rational, reasoning meta-consciousness). The very act of thinking, when done well, elevates the type of mathematical reasoning we are doing. Thinking is uniquely the single human act that changes itself and builds new forms of itself by being undertaken. The task of the soul is to rewrite the world.
162
163http://brainden.com/images/spinning-dancer-big.gif
164
165Think of how you could have something like a macroscopic sandcastle available to your senses. It would have to be made of something translatable in objective, analytical terms of concepts, all identifiable as mathematical waves with frequencies, available in pristine reproducible condition to your soul. The dimensional scale of the matter realm is big enough to fool us into constructing contingent eternal concepts (expressions) in the monad by which to relate ourselves to matter thinking that matter is all that there is.
166
167What are percepts? All you can have is a giant mathematical web with conceptual fluctuations (dimensionality via zero-dimensional antisymmetry). Think of a fractal leaf pattern, or a battenberg cake. You can have as much battenberg instantiations (tiled representations of varying frequency, amplitude, phase, scale) as you like, but you will never "fill in" all the conceptual detail. All art adheres this principle: no matter how detailed a piece of art gets, with simple geometric patterns or with highly realistic painted visuals, it will never have all the details you could want. The detail geometrically stops at a certain optimal fractal point to maximize the imagination's use of the art. Art is narrowing down an expression of mathematics for subjective benefit where we can re-generalize or project outwards. This accords by the PSR. Art follows the PSR. You can never artistically cater for the tastes of everyone, so you draw a highly refined estimation of what people with taste would like the most, generally speaking. All music follows this principle. Artists select/choose unconsciously what their audience is (a mathematical expression limiter) and they choose the range of human condition they want to express (again, a mathematical concept formed from the ultimate piecemeal concepts, sinusoids).
168
169You will never get "full detail aside interpretation". That is not possible of a universe of pure concept producing percepts. It does not adhere the PSR. Percepts can never be made from anything but concepts antisymmetrically expressed en masse (a field of mathematical conceptual "detail", which is analytically of course, never the detail itself but the style and the form of which there has to be an eternal, ontological mathematical sinusoidal order). You emphatically and categorically can’t get beyond definition. There is no getting out of the final part out the drop end of a conceptual tree defined by infinitudes, because they have well-defined analytical curves. Think how casting a strictly analytical net would yield no tears out the fabric, no matter the shape, the flagblowing in the wind, or the detail of this analytical component. It definitionally doesn’t have edges to escape out of because these haven’t been defined and you can’t ride a line out of analytical definition; you can’t escape it. Where would you go?
170
171The Spinning Dancer gif (the image with 3 variations and lines to trick your subconscious' subjectivity routines) demonstrates how wave phase works for us unconsciously. We are attuning in a phase aspect (wave function duration / elapsed time / segment) to what we are seeing. This is how it's being mathematically constructed as a thought. If you understand what's happening you are seeing how subjectivity/objectivity are irreducible at this stage to anything further. Objectively we can only know, and not perceive or sense, that there is a mathematical objective wave of a certain shape appearing in two-dimensional land. As soon as we try to subjectively interpret something, our senses fool us and we are no longer objective. This is subject-object monism at work!
172
173Why do we like videos and animation? They include phase, which makes it more "real"! It involves spatiotemporal interest dynamics.
174
175
176"If we switched places" - The mind makes thoughts, and these are unmistakably left conceptually "incomplete", as in, never fully objectively defined and detailed as it needs to be for the scenario: that's what the shared spatiotemporal domain is for, where wavefunction collapse happens and all the other monads fill in the minor details. This is where thought really comes into its own and has the dialectical means and clout to its process of becoming. Without a shared domain, and without good and evil's dialectic posed by opposites, we would not have the divine individuation process, the process of becoming.
177
178Basis reality can only contain conceptual thoughts, because there is nothing definitive in terms of percepts that could contain and encapsulate concepts. Concepts are in fact the perfect supply in this context. Concepts emphatically must exist, and they must be the pristine, perfectly clear and reproducible units for mental existence. If they weren't, we couldn't freely choose our thoughts and behaviours and actions at all times, drawing from what we know and can intuitively pinpoint and leverage - and neither could the material realm be made of anything that wasn't impervious to spacetime and change, such as a world with universals like electrons has to be. Electrons have to be made of math, there's no two ways about it. Dimensionality must be made of eternal mathematical concepts(!), numbers, and sinusoids.
179
180Life is not one-dimensional, and none of the greater examples of human behaviour come from the immediate environment and its biology and a sliver of memory; a fleeting afterglow of previous biological activity. Life and thought and mind comes from concepts. It does not and cannot originate in percepts. Percepts don't, to begin with, do anything in a hypothetical universe of non-mind and pure matter (which is itself a badly formed, "incomplete", conceptual thought).
181
182Concepts are exactly that which you get when you can't anymore provide any other possible dialectical conceptual alternatives. Concepts are not percepts, but neither are they "not-percepts" in particular! They are irreducibles of expression. The ultimate piecemeal concepts are numbers (sinusoids). They exist in such a range because there is nothing else you can draw from, for the eternally reflected bed of cosmic composition. Such a potential must be as big as it possibly can be, given all the rest of the scenario and the conceptual picture (which you would model clearer if you were an angel).
183
184It is never possible for the mind to generate thoughts from percepts or collections of percepts, since these would never constitute concepts the likes of which can be cross-sampled from a set of perfect clear pristine analytical concepts (numbers). Subjective thoughts are tellingly composed of numbers, and these conceptual thoughts remain conceptually incomplete as per the transposition of them over onto our world and its discrete, rough, coarse detailed nature of the problem we have in mind.
185
186Solving problems is always done on an iterative yet conceptual basis. You perform one improvement of the cycle, then you compare it against what you're now able to do. Highly conceptual thinking is where you get to learn about the nature of the concepts and the environment they are being used in, which yields an improvement, a meta-thought process. Apollonian thought is more conscious and demanding, and this is shown in the language we use and the deliberated methods we use to go about sharing and conveying our conjectures.
187
188Conceptual thoughts are incomplete as per they must be "filled-in" by detail and the intermeshing of form and content (invention; design process iteration; project management; analytical thought). Percepts do not inform conceptual formation of thoughts. Percepts can't do that. We must begin from something conceptual. We can't start with detail, and run the enormously inefficient roundabout trip from content to conception to content. That's a brutal violation of Occam's Razor. Mind does not think via percepts, but from the free mathematical potential to compose new generalized solutions to things - conscious mind is free to choose and select, always, from the top and never from lowermost circumstance. Mind has multi-stack freedom when mind is conscious. We're free straight through the stack from our thoughts to our bodily discomfort signals. A biological robot as proposed by science could never be this, because it would be beholden to this way or that; this process or that; definitively. What does free will accomplish? Exactly that which does not deterministically reduce straight down to a directly reproducible biological chain of events! That is what mind achieves and what the PSR guarantees.
189
190Multilateral vs. unilateral and serial vs. parallel in an empiricist universe: which biological cell would interact with which other? Where would they branch, where would they join threads of execution? Parallellism and serial thoughts must never be “explicit” (perceptual) but they must come from a reality with background dependency, i.e. the things themselves can never be the phenomena themselves directly (empiricism’s view) but underlying frequency broad band conceptions which yield collections of percepts within spacetime (Illuminism’s system). If you had a world of percepts only, there could be no case of parallell thinking and serial thinking both built into it. A type of reality in fact must cater for all possible interactions with every existent (and thus, we get subject-objects and we are subject-objects). If you were an angel, then every time you were having sex you could be thinking “I don’t need this”. That’s supersymmetry for you. Only a universe of all possible sinusoidal “dimensions” can produce these kinds of thoughts of full conceptual range. Life isn’t one-dimensional. Spacetime existence neatly compacts all of varying ranges of conceptual life (plants, insects, humans, angels) into the same plane of interaction. Such a plane can only be a mathematical virtual analytical vehicle for communication, and the only communication which can permitted is expression. From this, we develop all the abstract compounded forms of expression (art, machinery, aircraft, body piercings, poetry, psychological sex and romantic flutters) as much as we want and in full sinusoidal range of expression. Expression does not “come up over” reality or impose its spacetime structure on spacetime, because frequency has no such innate capacity (it’s frequency) and conception is the only thing which can gather frequency and can be permitted to gather frequency.
191
192A universe of concepts is what you get with the unit monad and sinusoids. Every concept is pristine and perfect, so it's reproducible when we combine sinusoids however we like. Our integrated mathematical soul contents are our key familiarity with this. The more we learn, the more we unlock different mathematical expressions of sinusoids of different varying styles and forms. The gems in the rough are thoughts and individuation material. A problem for angels is how to get to all the right thoughts we want;- how to organize, coordinate and arrange our thinking so it will bring us to clarity faster. This involves heavy meta-thought and heavy use of intuition. You do a lot of meta-thought about what specific types of thinking will help you (staying on this exploration of this type of noumena) and what won't. You are generalizing and improving your Selector Function every time you learn in life.
193
194Concepts (numbers) can always be combined to think new thoughts, but percepts can't. Concepts are adaptable, flexible and open; they are supremely capable whereas percepts are always completely and rigidly established and filled-in. Concepts hold the highest rational latent potential for new thoughts, compared to percepts that have destination and detail. A percept, moreover, requires that you carry a concept with you to select as you look over it to begin with! A simple study of one of those optical illusion photos (there is one called the Spinning Dancer) shows you how subjectivity can make you think a silhouette is moving left, then right, when you can pause the video and objectively there is no difference but the conceptual projection we have given to our own recent memory (not the objective world).
195
196https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlFePHhd-0M
197
198http://brainden.com/images/spinning-dancer-big.gif
199
200It cannot be emphasized enough that all mathematical dimensionality is "virtual". In reality, you don't have thoughts about the objective matter in front of you: it would be more correct to say, you have thoughts about your own psyche and its mathematical interaction with the mathematical world of other monads (the collective), and you are having all these thoughts about your own exploration of this.
201
202Subject-object monism guarantees that you are having mathematical thoughts about things that aren't belonging in any particular frame of mind (spatiotemporality so much as cognitive priority; the emotion-space; the intuition-space; sheer rationality). Mind has a task, and that is to synthesize all it has come across in the most grand and powerful generalization possible. That's why your thoughts float and meander. You are being called to the highest task. For that, your Selector Function has adopted a wider mathematical selection over the evolutions of your soul line. It is unconscious because god is always unconscious at first. We are right now discovering how.
203
204With concepts, what you get is prime interoperability (plug-and-play) because all concepts can map to other interesting thoughts, whether these are conceptual explorations in deep introverted thought; fantasy; archetypes; or a collection of detail formed into a detailed percept. The role of concepts is to analytically define expressions (meaning, purpose, interest, utility, power, significance). Percepts cannot define anything analytically, so their interoperability is virtually nil. Actually, strictly speaking it is nil as per percepts on percepts in themselves - which could never happen. Concepts operate on percepts, and a universe of Mind running concepts can of course generate percepts in myriad dialectical ways, thus bringing about conceptual revolutions in concept formation.
205
206Percepts are just another way of grouping conceptual mental activity for thinking minds. Only the math and the ontological analytical mathematical philosophy is actually real. Percepts, the content, come with the form of the concepts. This allows us to take in and reflect what we are doing, individuated by our own actions and our own selves in reflection as a mathematical relationship (romantic relationships, and life in the public society, which are ways to individuate the Self and Ego). Percepts are the style and form we take things in with. Really, we are just using our concepts (our sinusoids), since these are the only true things which exist. Percepts in themselves cannot exist without concepts, because they wouldn't be made of anything! What is it made of? To have anything, we must first have a solid ontological foundation and a complete set of mathematical language.
207
208Think about this: sentences and paragraphs are content (percepts), but they are all together, individually differently differentiated definites; “somethings”. This, in a strict empiricist “flat world”, wouldn’t principally mean anything since interaction would have to be informed or served by pre-existing force of basis (good conception; well-collected concetption; well-formed conception; good basis; strong basis). In ontological mathematics (true reality), the sentence wave is something that hits your mind’s eye within the monad (zero-dimensionally) and this is equivalent to say that the infinite range of sinusoids, the sinusoidal “map” or “web” ranging across infinite sinusoidal dimensions or signals, is being impressioned exactly and particularly by that such a coherent mental image is that which served by the page (or rather, the analogous noumenal analytical mathematical contents that we prize out of it; out of how our eyes and direction to face the screen in microcosm is visually impacted, and then how our conceptual ranging [eye focal point which is virtual and analytical] hits the page; and also how we range the conception over a selection of a finite reach of words).
209
210Infinitude is the realm of the concept (holism), and the small band of spacetime frequencies permitted into the spacetime domain are the stretch of spacetime finitude that the infinite mind closes in upon. Gnosis is guaranteed since the infinite mind in infinite sinusoidal range is “bigger” than the spatiotemporal domain’s banding foundationally. Spacetime is narrow-band, conception is broad band, and bandwidth is rationality’s inflexion across and through the spacetime arena by mathematical portals (Fourier math transforms;- the Fourier transform and the Fourier inverse transform).
211
212
213
214Percepts are shown to us in dynamic ways (think of how cats chase their toys) and this reflects a conceptual nature: motion, physical dynamics of shapes, abstract goals understood unconsciously, and so on. Chris Crawford, in his Phlogeny of Play presentation, mentioned that neanderthals threw rocks and that the early bush hunting process was to throw rocks and see what happened, and the animal would run off, and eventually after chasing the animal enough times and throwing rocks, it would get tired and collapse. Whether this is true or not, it demonstrates that mind uses concepts to get what it wants, and at no stage can percepts produce evolution or targeted, streamlined and focused mental activity. Concepts operate on percepts, and changing mental concepts are informed in part via percepts - but we never take initiative via anything other than concepts. The unconscious is a conceptual mathematical existence. Mind cannot operate otherwise. Mind cannot pick a percept and suddenly decide to be guided forwards by it. How would it? - A mind, first of all, must already be in the business of selecting and engaging particular parts of the percept that it wants to select for. A mind cannot just take an arbitrary chunk of content and slam it into its mind-space. That can never happen. Neither does Mind take orders from something unfit to be a mind which generates conceptual thoughts. Ontologically it is necessary that all minds think and contribute to ontological wavefunction collapse. Percepts don't determine this, because that would mean arbitrary details of matter could have different types of determination on Mind depending on what they could do as a collection. Since the whole of possible matter configurations within specific parameters is not something the universe of Mind can ever evaluate, we deal in concepts - and as raw conceps as we can get: sinusoids. Mind uses concepts, and this is the workaround enabling any contingent, provisional working of content (percept) to interact with concepts via the mind. Since concepts can be composed as thoughts, this allows us to interact mathematically with any percept. But percepts don't have objective qualities or inferences that can be made of them: all our conceptual interaction (thoughts) with percepts are our own. We are living in our own projection constantly, which is why different words and stories and books mean radically different things to different people. If percepts governed reality then everything would have to proceed by a strictly objective basis (which is ruled out by the PSR for not generating enough interesting outcomes).
215
216With concepts, we can interoperate conceptual understandings in such a manner that we can even bridge different contents (optical illusions, movies, stories, music) with our own private interpretations. This is impossible for percepts to do in any linear way, because percept upon percept does not generate any meaningful selection or choice whatsoever. There is no definition of what should be taken and what should be shared, utilized, valued. This can only come if eternal minds exist to carry out their own becomings.
217
218Causation cannot be decided by an undefinable, inconsistent random disparity between choices. It can't be originating from spacetime - otherwise, we would be able to perceive a pattern in the spacetime domain which alluded to this. Causation also must happen everywhere, arising from all minds (since nothing can possibly command our life choices for us), and it must be according to the same universal rules and concepts (else we'd have competing patches of the universe and inconsistent, undefinable interactions between particles). Causation also cannot be local, and must be nonlocal, as the Pauli Exclusion Principle shows. The only answer is as in ontological mathematics.
219
220When your unconscious looks at something, a mathematical conceptual selection and a judgement has occurred. A judging function (your feelings) has determined something about it; it's hooked its way into your evaluation and estimation process, and come out with something. You feel something as a result, and people talk about how they feel in a new place; or you can have a feeling which you reflect on, and you're maybe surprised that you feared something without needing to. Concepts deliver this completely independently from percepts! Percepts could never operate this way, because they are tied to the spatiotemporal locality. Your senses can't tell you how to think; they can only report on sensation. Percepts cannot think. Percepts cannot be arranged to outmaneuver the sensory locality of reference - they would simply keep coming in! How do you fit biology-based percepts into coherent thoughts of reflection when the whole historic aim of the body has been purely spacetime means and ends? It doesn't click.
221
222Empiricism has failed to illustrate why (Occam's Razor) the body has developed separately from the mind over the millennia. It wasn't being influenced by the many sinusoidal frequencies we have access to that are not pressed into the material realm. It was being influenced by something else: the environmental circumstance of Mind and Mind's priorities. The holographic body only has to be, in its essential musculoskeletal capacity, so good as to contain a piloting mind and relay the senses and perform. It doesn't have to select or think. Think of what life would be like with a different group of senses - as though you could never feel your stomach or digestive system or your skin at all, and if you didn't have physical senses but you had radio a frequency transceiver. You aren't your body - you're sensing the culmination of a provisional set of conceptual priorities. Embodied life first arose like this: "silent", and eventually as the more complex phenomena in the spacetime realm were interacted with, the DNA (content) was selected by the smarter souls which could get more out of the better bodies and the improved conditions for life. But this has nothing to do with percepts defining everything. Bodies can't think, and percepts did not shape biological evolution directly, because cells would always be looking to maximize their survival chance; their energy; and without being brought into balance by minds, the regulation of biological processes would be impossible. Life finds a way. Life, mind, is the thing that selects and orchestrates the whole show. Life (mind) doesn't need to be locally exclusively interoperative in strictly materialistic terms to be able to influence, connect to bodies and live using the sensory configuration of that body. Early fish didn't have a clear vision, but that didn't stop conceptual minds from swimming and refining how mind lived for mind. The minds interacted with the spacetime bodies and the matter and the other minds, which over a long period of time allowed improved conceptual generalizations and thinking. Where percepts fail to generate deliberate conclusions (non-mind can't) Mind always selects and responds. Sperms select and respond, but you can't generate mind from matter since there is no valid deterministic causational process and no filter of selection to achieve this. Filter and selection is inherent to an eternal collective of minds which are beings and becomings. When they reincarnate, minds simply follow along in the grand race they have always known. They pick up where they left off. They intermingle with the spatiotemporal domain of matter. They weave in and out between it - this is how we have all made our soul lines.
223
224The universe must be something that caters for and fosters the most vibrantly interesting degrees of phenomena; it must do this in the most compact and supremely efficient ontological form possible. If we'd had a percept-only universe, it could not contain mind and if we'd somehow unconceivably had a universe of mind but no matter, then we're again going nowhere. The PSR guarantees that something much better must exist. There is literally nothing else possible -- and that's a fact. You can tune into this analytically to confirm it yourself. That's all the PSR ever needed. We live in a PSR universe and you are slowly coming to terms with it, as you become god.
225
226Subjectivity allows the mind to form conceptual thoughts and projections over the detail of the percept. Look again at the Spinning Dancer gif. We are imposing our own subjectivity and meaning onto our experiences, and this is implicit and required of Mind. If Mind didn't do this, we would be forever stuck in an unresolvable causation loop of infinite regress. (Something always would cause something else but there is no true beginning or origin, since everything is projected in that form and in that way, as an enormous set of piecemeal percepts). Subjectivity allows our thoughts to have direction. We impose our subjectivity, our favourite definitive mathematical desires and estimations; and from this we get something else, and we refine that thought, and this is happening incredibly quickly, and continuously all the time. We vary the thoughts we tend to have, to "work out" (literally work) what we mean, and this is done unconsciously. The more we have to "work on", or the higher quality the content, the stronger our intuitions and thoughts can become. We have mathematical ways to modulate in many different abstract conceptual directions, for many different abstract conceptual goals. Life isn't one-dimensional, it's multifaceted. There is a plurality of life goals, and we continually reselect what our next thoughts will be depending on all sorts of factors due to recent changes in time; recent changes in circumstance; and so on. We then use an objective language system (words) to describe the overarching forms of what we think the most interesting item of concern is (or this is given by a particular use context of life).
227
228
229
230Mind features concepts like archetypes and The Higher Self. Percepts don't have these concepts, so percepts have to go without the synthesis of large swathes of information (and the compactualization and encapsulation of such integrations) available to highly evolved life. Since there is no conceptual way to select within it. Percepts can only confer sensory information, not even what's been collected of recent memory (The Higher Self is cultural and collective, not genetically passed down). If robots could collect memory then this would again have to be orchestrated and coordinated via mathematical conceptual rules in computer code. Conceptual rules would have to exist for how to filter incoming information and how to hold onto things; how to judge; how to define things. Of course, since these are only distinct individual words, and since sinusoids and monads govern everything, individual concepts can never be prized out apart from the rest of reality as if it's a plug-and-play materialistic universe. Thoughts come inherently interlinked! All contingent (non-necessary) concepts like archetypes do. Our world schema is highly interlinked with our logos and our general rationality.
231
232Percepts can't act, can't think, can't select, can't dream and can't perceive. Percepts cannot give rise to mind and life. Atoms cannot give rise to mind and life, because there's nothing to do or to have done, in the flimsy conception of a material only universe. All thought is concept. We think to prove and disprove things, and only in that do we become conscious enough to note the validity of something sharply cognitive. We think, therefore we are cognizant!
233
234How does a mind think? It uses its sinusoids and composes them in interestingly different ways, due in part to its recent experiences. You have access to conceptualizations of how a plastic bag moves because of your many many trillion different sinusoids in your mind which allow you to mentally simulate and imagine these precise thoughts. Percepts alone would never reach that - and what's more, without a mind-space you cannot develop conceptual revisions of concepts on other concepts and other percepts!
235
236Percepts either feed back directly into a biological system (materialism; empiricism) or they are fed into self-solving Mind (idealism; rationalism). In the materialist view, percepts are claimed to be a stepping-stone to sentience for the power that abstraction brings. Yet there is no mechanism for percepts to do anything with one another. There is no mechanism to generate life and mind, and so life and mind are conceptually absent from a universe without Mind. In ontological mathematics, percepts are something we tune into or don't depending on cognitive preference (MBTI type), habits, degree of consciousness and intuition, and so on. We certainly don't have to stay "present" in the material realm if we want to think in terms far outside this capacity, in higher frequencies and in more sophisticated patterns. We are free to think, which then forms the thinking we will do later. This freedom is essential for free will: we must be able to make choices that are potentially markedly different from other souls, all the while that we are all existing and collapsing the wavefunction over a period of time. For that, we must be able to differentiate different types of thought (or get there when conscious enough).
237
238The angels can never take pity on humans. If you wanted to know why life can be incredibly hard - it reduces to the PSR. Nobody can artificially intervene. If anyone could get a free ride in life existentially, then soon enough everyone would be signing up for it at the earliest opportunity! God Game Planets would cease to produce divine culture, and the whole game would be up. Gods cannot allow such circumstances or the potentials thereof, so it is ruled out. All angels must abide by these rules (not that they can take any issue with it anyway, since they are well beyond being highly intuitive enough to realize this with pristine clarity). Life is this way because it must be as fair as possible for all individuals to get a real taste and feedback about what life is. Life must be an "organic" experience for everyone on Earth, with as little divine intervention as possible (i.e. only when absolutely necessary). It must pull you back in so you can win effectively eternal (generalized) solutions to contingent problems.
239
240God Game Planets are dramatic scenarios designed by either ourselves or the gods/angels, depending on how you want to look at it. Evolution must proceed for us individually in this way: we must overcome; there is no other way to reach a better state of life. The angels knew that if we would achieve a stable planet, this would have to come in a form as stable and clearminded as possible. There is no getting it wrong! There is no taking charge only to not know what to do or how to restructure society. If we think about it, these sorts of horrors could have been repeated on the earliest God Game Planets whereas now we live quite a prepackaged and managed "product". Your own life personally, if it's been hard, is not something to feel self pity or discomfort for.
241
242The angels want you to individuate; to climb all the way; and in doing so, you are not going to be allowed to feel vindication in a suboptimal, premature way. You must be strictest of spirit, and resolute. Every complaint you have is not divine enough that it fixes your problems. The angel archetype points the way. You can develop clearer and clearer thinking, with your unconscious mathematics rushing to figure it out. You can start using the neocortex more and the emotions less. You can completely overcome and restructure the ways you thought about the world, and people and society, and yourself. You can completely escape all the darkness and perceived injustice. When you reframe things more powerfully, life becomes clearer. This is a conceptual difference, not an additive difference - and you can't write it down because it comes in abstract, conceptual form interlinked with everything.
243
244Do angels have compassion? They know when they're not needed, and when there's more pressing problems to solve to get all souls to gnosis that bit faster; and they know when there's absolutely nothing useful you can say to someone, because no matter how many times you frame it for them, they cannot understand or grasp the situation. Angels are so highly intuitive that they can see right through you and your intentions intuitively - and from the least glimmer; the least few pieces of information you would ever expect. They are infinitely accepting of you at the same time (extremely highly intuitive souls simply have to be, and can't avoid it); they have no particular interest or care in someone they cannot communicate with. Your job is to make the best use of your time and to evolve to divinity for yourself, which is the same goal and outcome effectively of saving the community and the collective. You aren't asked to do the impossible or to go beyond the possible. You do what you can, like everyone else. But with consciousness, vindication, balance, emotional security, and the rest. How do you want to live your life? What would someone minimizing poor choices do? The ultimate principal gnostic freedom is freedom from making the wrong choices. We will always have ourselves and our choices; our attempts to maximize outcomes for ourselves and the community/world. The angelic disposition is one of accepting not only your own Shadow but others'. Angels however of course do not condone trying to anticipate how others' Shadows, others' lives, would be best served. Use what best serves yourself most rationally, as a cell of god fundamentally streamlining and optimizing your own corner of existence. Always choose higher reason, better intuitions - because you are living for your soul line.
245
246Go with the main thread of the story of life. Don't get sidetracked and diminished.
247
248
249
250We only have access to concepts. Concepts, via Fourier Mathematics, become differentiated from the percepts - which are arrayed in the spatiotemporal domain for us to pick out what we want, just as you can tell a dimming pattern of a light through a distorted glass window. Fourier mathematics and concepts (both sinusoids, and sinusoidal composed thoughts) are built into existence; so what is happening when we interact with percepts, is our minds are filtering out different frequency patterns (concepts; sinusoid cross-analyzed similarities in the eternal, non-spatiotemporal Fourier frequency domain) and this is what consititutes thought. This is the form of thought. The style of thought is how we think; but the interpretation of this is always contingent, provisional, and transiently given. Only the ontological form is most reliably consistent in the way that it is the form of everything that we do.
251
252Concepts are independent entirely from percepts. Concepts provide the basis sinusoidal components for us to weave thoughts. But the addition of more sinusoids is never an additional difference. Addition doesn't ontologically take place; we don't have independent realities being tacked on. (We have independent access to all the basis sinusoids; if we didn't, then tasting new food or music would be impossible). Monads have the ability to compose sinusoids to produce thoughts. But none of this is happening independently in a separate "promotion" from everything else. These are all piecemeal descriptions of ontological mathematics.
253
254The objective qualities of concepts (sinusoids) allow us to share things in the objective dream, the spatiotemporal domain. This allows us to have new experiences and to encounter things we'd never have been able to simulate or arrive at rationally in the same time and style. One purpose of embodied life is to encounter things in such a balanced, measured and controlled way as to optimize the outcomes you're getting. You can choose from the widest repetoire of sinusoids to facilitate what balances and supports your existence in this mortal cycle. Ultimately you will consider as you ascend, that your constitution of mind is the most important thing to you, and you are to become independent of the things which distract you. Your mind space becomes more apparent as something highly valuable, and you start to apprehend judgements and estimations about what will happen before they take place in spacetime. The quest has become full and complete knowledge (gnosis), and you don't want to be here anymore (the domain of others' minds where they are lost or cannot keep pace with you). The search is always on; the struggle for individuation and complete ultimate knowledge drives you; the additional securities and clarities of mind are what you look for. You depend on yourself as well as the society.
255
256
257
258Do Illuminists have compassion? They know to focus on the outputs of life that will carry forward the most possible peoples' destinies, rather than helping or defending the few particular individuals, mortal personas, or events or objectives. This is what the angels advocate whenever they talk to the highest members of the Pythagorean Illuminati. Existence is this way, and there is no other alternative. You have to act "invisibly". Intelligence doesn't get a center-stage on TV yet, not at this stage in The God Game. The angels know acutely that whatever is to happen on Earth, it must be in accordance with the highest most workable, least forced style of psychology and rationality. It must cater for people and it must not stretch the human will too much to impossibly likely and unreliable extents.
259
260
261
262When you receive percepts en masse (visual, sensory, aural) you are not suffering anything but a particular, mathematically-encoded visitation on the range of percepts. This is exactly akin to how there is computerized math in video game engines, which selects using matrices (a view matrix and a projection matrix) in order to find or derive the information that gets presented to the computer screen. Ontological mathematics does exactly the same via pure concepts. As above, so below. All the visuals you see are math being projected as though the world is 3-dimensional, but you wouldn't believe that you lived in a video game just from playing it, or that the game world is behind the television, perfect and crisp though it is. All the difference is held in conception.
263
264Mathematical conception creates the camera and the eye. In the frequency domain during mental imagery and hypnagogia, you don't have eyes. You have a mind.
265
266
267
268A range of percepts is what you receive. But this is not a percept - it's a concept! Consciousness is a narrowing filter. All mathematics involved in the ontological wavefunction collapse have to be reducible to concepts, not some magical nonsense other thing which can't be defined and can't be objective and sinusoidal and isn't an existent. It's a thought, and all thoughts are existents. They are compounded sinusoidal contents.
269
270
271
272When we think of what we want from life, we are always talking about where we will be different and to what extent, and to what pattern. This is grand conceptualization. Personality is conceptualization. We are mathematically refining what we are, to what extents and purposes, and what we would like to be, and where this is different (emphasis in all the distinct dimensions or aspects of life, like where to be angry; where to be intense, where to be studied and considerate, and so on).
273
274The Higher Self wants pure god for itself. The highest experience you will choose for yourself in future lives on a divine planet are lives of the Self. We are not here to connect with others predominantly of life. Most of all, we are here to find the true authentic Self (Abraxas = god = math), through the devil (the unindividuated Self; through others and through circumstance and imperfect, endarkened culture; through events). We thus move from antisymmetry and asymmetry to symmetry (we put focus over Form/frequency rather than Content/spacetime). Sensory cognitive preference is the most animalistic cognitive preference, where thinking-intuitive cognitive preference resembles angels in microcosm. The future humans will resemble angels, not extroverts. They will be as calm and calculating and brilliantly vibrantly introverted as possible. Everything else will eventually become obsolete on a planet of introverts.
275
276When you get better at thinking, you get better at core selection of your outputs. You can of course style them however you want. Total power means total clarity and focus over what goes through your mind. A god has mastery over the Forms, so it could produce the perfect products, the perfect entertainment and the perfect experiences -- only, it knows (as the angels do) that these are suboptimal as per maximizing Quality of Life for every soul.
277
278One purpose of the collective and of existence itself is that we have to be moving forward towards a better future state for everyone. In fact, this is embedded within the PSR and it is a necesary prerequisite to any existence at all. We have to be constantly moving towards a better potential outcome for everyone in the collective, since that is the highest priority. If you don't agree with this you are endarkened. We will gather ourselves and our resources eventually to make life permanently better for everyone in a very basic, fundamental sense. The key here is that this isn't rationally focused towards compassion or the immediacy of provision of a better feeling-type comfort and security in everyday life. That is not what the angels advocate for, because it is an impossible (and thus irrational) task. Every offshoot that is not pure PSR, extremist rationalist styling of thought befalls such a destiny. The angels want a divine world, not an emotionally happy world which cannot even be brought about owing to the virtue of poor thought. Emotionalistic thinking is the semantics, but rational thinking is the only syntax of how we can figure out the ideal type of world we all want. People disagree on methods (because their thinking is poor) but everyone wants an ideal society.
279
280Concepts must precede precepts, because all that can exist is a conceptual mathematical notion of what is to be discussed and explored. You cannot have any ontological stepwise linear chains of events. You can't have a percept without interacting with it, and without picking or selecting something over the surface of it, or without subjective appreciation in some part and not other parts. That's subjectivity.
281
282Think about materials. A plastic bag has to reflect light. In realistic computer graphics, none of the scene can be rendered without tracing all the light bounces over the different spatial objects to be conveyed - this is because what exists is not strictly percepts in themselves, but conceptual definitions (like reflectivity and how it shifts in mathematical ways) which define what is presented. You also cannot have percepts without their interaction with concepts, for exactly this reason. Nothing exists in itself in a vacuum. Ontological mathematics provides definitional conceptual ways for light to behave within spacetime. None of spacetime exists portioned out into arbitrary chunks.
283
284Computer programming has levels of indirection, program scope of reference and availability, and linear vs. parallel determination of logical execution. But when you're interacting with computer code, you're never supplanting ontological mathematical reality with something else. You're dealing with ontological mathematical content, which binds itself up into ontological mathematical monadic execution sequences (via electricity and the CPU) in a highly abstract, intelligible way. Ontological mathematics has no such thing as indirection, scope, or linear or parallel chains of causation. Computing is a conceptual sophistication built within reality. Reality has all the provisions necessary for us to invent philosophy, communication, novels, language, vocabulary, entertainment, psychology, art, and computer programming. These are conceptual provisions, filtered in highly symmetrical ways via the older souls of the universe. Mind has started to manufacture what it would like most! This is the appearance of high culture and high technology.
285
286All percepts have ways they interact with concepts. No percept exists in and of itself, without basis substantial definition (sinusoids). Percepts are Mind's execution of concepts in parallel. That is their function. With higher granularity of control (through primary concepts in our higher neocortex thinking), we can build better percepts and better concepts. The trebuchet and the guillotine are examples of spatiotemporal inventions that would be unthinkable without spacetime. The ways that the mind interacts with its environment (walking), as well as the ways we use technology, are given by higher conceptual developments than the sense-space and the intuition-space alone. Only the mind-space allowed any of these things to come into use.
287
288Percepts have an effect on us which is conceptual and distinctly Subjectively defined in the Selector Function, rather than being objective and unchangeable and rigid as scientific materialism would have it. When you look at a text label on a glass or a bottle, your unconscious does something (it has to) and this is different for different people, but the most conscious minds have individuated-away any conceptual bridging in the bicameral sense. Adverts are bicameral for bicameral individuals, but their unconscious effects are consciously available for the highly powered thinkers. What else could you expect?- Reality has to be as irreducible as possible. The only distinctions we are allowed (the only ones permitted to exist) are that which we make along our soul line, via unconscious mathematics in our soul contents. Everyone has them! That is the only type of universe which can exist. No objective, infallible rules are influencing us all the time like puppet tethers as science claims. If they were, then they would surely be present everywhere in all scenarios and domains -- or else, what is the sufficient reason for this distinction? We can thus rationally rule it out, because either the universe makes sense (it has rational rules and ways to denominate or differentiate or distribute these forms) or there is a reason why we can't know, or reality is an inconsistent unstable chaos with no inherent structure.
289
290
291
292The Leibnizian type of PSR universe is the only type which can exist. There isn't actually a "best of all possible worlds" in terms of ontological form. There is only the well-defined type of universe based on a totality of complete mathematical language with all the basis ingredients (sinusoids) accessible at all times by all monads, and with no external promotions of status for things like events, causation or outcome: it's all built in, and it must all be built in, else there's no inherent structure to reality. If reality has a structure, it must be well-defined and it must be capable of being all conceptual, and without any external dependencies. Souls must routinely, habitually carry existence forward and without any external help (as there is none, and can be none). Nothing that couldn't be guaranteed (divine intervention) would ever be part of candidacy for reality. This is all because reality itself reflects the PSR, since there are no other candidates for reality! We are just reflecting our own inaccuracies and irrationalities when debating which theoretical, poorly and improperly fleshed out "types of universe" there could be. Multiverses are a moronic idea, and so are universes that aren't supremely rational PSR type universes. Literally nothing else makes any sense. Do you think angels can bear to think about anything so strange and poorly thought out?
293
294Language is dialectical and gets us piece by piece to completion, definitionally, by establishing further conditionalities and analytical concepts (mathematical philosophy). Thinking language is rule-based, in that it's conceptual and concept-based. The ultimate life is the thinking intuitive life, which explores the full potential of the mind. Angels are entirely focused on what they don't yet understand. The most determined souls of existence (angels and gods) are routinely, habitually engaged in thought. They love thought. Thought brings them endless clarity, at a rate which nobody else understands. When you compare different types of souls, you can see that certain points you could make are a moot point, since there is a conceptual difference: if they understood other prerequisite generalities, they wouldn't be behaving in such a way to begin with. If Muslims, Christians and Jews were incredibly bright Illuminists, they wouldn't be coming to you with any comments on anything because they'd have their own thinking-intuitive creases to iron out in their souls. People who complain are not focused on the divine Higher Self. The angel archetype is one of the ways you can tune into your own Higher Self. You will make the journey in whatever way you can by the means of the grips and dialectical shifts in your own life. Your goal is to maximize your own experiences, outcomes and future developments any way you can. The world has been set against you (this time!), but you will have vowed to do your best anyway.
295
296It cannot be overstressed that the utlimate outcome of life is god (mathematical complete knowledge; gnosis; Abraxas manifested within you). Everything that is less than perfect will be wiped away. But no sooner than it is natural to do so! We are headed for a type of future that is divine, where everything goes right for everyone generally speaking all the time.
297
298Your soul is not your face, your body or your persona, or your voice, or your Ego or Self. Your soul is something which has no physical extension, but coordinates and commands in the utmost sense. Spacetime required that we constructed bodies out of this matter. The physical form of bodies varies over different God Game Planets. It's highly likely that we have similar bodies in essential shape and utility (5 fingers), but even on Earth there are people with 6 fingers on their hands. Some people have webbed toes. It comes down to utility, which has universal type (nothing to do with locality and localisms of fighting of biological selection, in itself, as in the false Darwinism). Think of the different races of peoples on Earth. Our faces are different and there are some different skull structures, but we are functionally within parameters of oxygen, water and the biology that has to support us. On other planets there are other variations, but each God Game Planet would be pursuing the same noumenal mathematical principles such as communitarianism and humanism and logos rationalism (concepts), regardless of the phenomenal circumstance (percepts). If Earth souls reincarnated on other planets in the event of a biodiversity extinction, we would all refit our internal mental models to the new faces and bodies of that host planet. The divine future, in much the same way, has less regard for bodies and faces, so much so that we'd see them in the same way as we now see animal faces and bodies. The purpose of the soul is to rewrite the world, and spatiotemporal matter with it. Gnosis means power means freedom. Do you get it yet?
299
300Other God Game Planets will have extremely similar gravity, and extremely similar planet sizes, with water and oxygen. How do souls get there?! - Via the evolution from cellular life, which may even have arrived via asteroids! First there were the dinosaurs. Your soul may have piloted a dinosaur body before on this planet or another! We are souls, not bodies or persons. The soul has no physical dimensionality at all, which is all the better because we can have as many spatiotemporal bodies as we require. The soul has its own character, just as you can intuitively grasp the soul of each main character in a movie. The soul can choose to live on its own terms regardless of its body. What does The Higher Self select? What does it want? What does it want to end, and what does it want to protect? Where, and how does this vary? Under what mathematical circumstances and conceptual fluctuations? This is the item we are always trying to solve (how to become perfect; how to be adaptable to all situations; how to become god). There is no other grand quest-context for life, because this has hit the ultimate scope of the monad. All that remains is to fully specify this in sinusoidal syntax (which is not one-dimensional).
301
302The range of vocabulary, as well as the many ways we can combine words, hints at a massively more complex reality than we can define in simple materialistic ways. Underneath the words we use are always multiple answers and conceptualizations we can get from the sentences (particularly true of The God Series and The Truth Series!). The world works under an interconnected web of inter-action. Sinusoidal thoughts can draw from every single sinusoid in the monad. There is no sufficient reason for an early upper limit. Angels think in highly parallelized (intuitive) thoughts. You can have incredibly powerful thoughts by drawing in vast ranges of noumena (like what is the will of every major segment of human society, and what this will bring about), by thinking in parallel. Intuition involves thinking in parallel. In computing, the GPU is the powerhouse, dealing in parallellized computation, with the CPU as the directing logical framing base for the GPU to set its gaze on. The CPU provides the logic and the GPU projects the 3d content to the screen in 2 dimensions, shading it and calculating the shadows and depth on a per-vertex or per-pixel basis (these are the parallel threads of execution). Parallel thought is more wieldly than serial thought. Serial, conscious thinking is how we come to the most far-reaching, studied considered conclusions (calm, measured, assertive thinker). It sets the agenda and it delivers clarity. Our unconscious works out the rest, via parallellized optimized highly refined "passive" workings. When you choose to invest in something more generalized to bake it into the unconscious, you unconsciously know you're giving yourself a hand. Serial thought is for indirectional traversal up and down the stack of consciousness conceptual containers; parallel thought involves laterally integrating thoughts in broad band. Serial thought is analytical and left-brained while parallel thought is holistic.
303
304Minds with next to no intuition (scientists and atheists) cannot conceive of a highly interlinked interdependent intermeshing interplay of cause and effect within the world. That's a conceptual mathematical difference among minds, which would not exist that way if their root conceptual soul contents changed, and this is why there's no Easy Talking To People about the irregularities and contradictions in what they think: we live in a PSR world which demands we find the highest and best (and also the fastest) most optimal routes to solving problems. We aren't going to get there by pleading with other souls that they become more conscious! That's just like praying! Conception stomps along and other people clean up after it. (Or other unconscious processes. Crime scene cleanup is a societal “immune system” extension of this). Napoleon and Alexander the Great could conceptualize with a stomping lead capacity. It’s a race to clear conception. All competition is. DIY rockets, sexual creativity and spontaneity, The Cold War, jazz music - are all expressions of this. (Have you tried Bossa Nova?)
305
306It will have occurred to you sometime in your life, that rather than simply hope for the best and plod on in the same unconscious way, you ought to become conscious of exactly what you're doing and how exactly something different will help you. This is infact exactly what problem solving actually is, and it comes with the form of every puzzle and task in existence. Tasks are how we learn and optimize. All human actions reflect the problems of optimization. Economization of quality of life is about optimizing the human experience on Earth.
307
308
309
310Video games don't reflect reality. They only mathematically reflect mathematical parallels to embodied life! What do you think a video game camera is? In video game programming, the camera of course has no physical existence. It's an analytical game class in the game code, and it provides mathematical projection matrix operations to produce the view and projection matrices, and the perspective projection, by which all the game vertex coordinates in 3d space are transformed onto a 2d plane (the screen) by the graphics card. When the camera rotates, that's not a human head rotating by the mathematical analog of your head moving! (It’s a purely mathematical analytical head, which is a concept! Concepts can indeed weave in and out of one another). That's the relevance, because of ontological mathematics and its pristine reproducability of eternal sinusoids (conceptual forms; all numbers are forms and concepts). Only mathematics, the grand language of perfect existence itself, is actually reproducible. Mathematics is the substance of life, and we are literally encoding it into every action we take, whereupon we will eventually grant ourselves the power to manipulate matter itself! Of course at that point, humanity will have become divine enough not to need to create strange new vehicles and bodies. We will already have the psyches of angels at that point. The angels know all of this acutely; it's built into their soul contents so that they cannot think anything lesser (this is provided by the PSR, as part of how we must always be moving forward to better outcomes). Think of what it is that makes souls like ours fail and flop anyway at the thinking-tasks of angels: what exactly is it that we are thinking differently, in the first place, unable to form the most powerful contextual thoughts? That difference is what we have to become conscious of, and in consciousness, comes clarity and freedom and gnosis.
311
312In ontological reality, there is no absolute up or down or nearby-of-rotation. That's because these things are always contingent and given and provisional. They are not eternal or necessary. That's because these things have nothing to do with ontological form, but they are all being introduced in-situ, transiently in between god's breakage and god's reunification - it's because they are a means to bridge parts of the subject-object search for things, with the outcomes. Nothing here can be promoted above the status of being integral to our thinking at this stage. Irreducible ontological form of reality means that each contingent non-necessary thing (and all thoughts are still yet existents) must have no special status or privilege in themselves. That's because they must be volatile, movable, shiftable and refinable for us to get to godhood. If they weren't, and if any thought itself had any special external status or promotion, then reality itself would be incomplete and inconsistent! This is the only valid race to godhood and gnosis. This is the only type of universe possible to exist. This cannot be overstated. Everything must be revaluable as an independent part (thought) by which to come to clarity, and to come to gnosis.
313
314The dialectical world of human language (the Internet) is nothing to drag you down and culturally drown you. You are bigger than any experience, and your soul makes your choices. You are the captain of your soul.
315
316True freedom of thought means thinking consciously and prolifically. Did you want to know something?- Why not think about it? You will learn in later lives that this option always served you the best. If we listen to music that reminds us of the eternal hall of existence and its challenges and pitfalls and triumphs, then we can get into this sort of mindset. Contents, percepts, are important.
317
318Everything is mathematically defined. This cannot be overstated. Everything you know about embodied life is actually just pure mathematics -- as if it were as free as video game programming 3d math. The spell, the illusion, must be conceptually grasped to be broken. You think in powerfully different ways (that were of course never present in percepts, much to the eternal shock of scientists if they could wrap their heads around it!) and then you "see". In The Matrix, one of the spiritual guide characters said to Neo, "there is no spoon". There is no percept in and of itself, and neither does the arrayed percept information mark anything of significance in itself over you or your view of reality. Once you think in foundationally different ways (a conceptual difference, not an additive difference) you simply are thinking on another level or of another meta-thought kind of thinking. Consciousness elevates the unconscious thoughts into something foundationally useful and transcendental of the old mode of thought. This is defined not by scientific empirical evidence by which we've become conscious, but by the rest of the outputs we can now largely make and refactor into our own rolling conscious execution (thinking). Consciousness is invariably a thinking human's subject of thought, not an empiricist's. You cannot empirically evaluate something of the mind (consciousness), as it relates to what’s being contemplated out in the (frequency) world, therefore there will never be any full, complete hard proof of consciousness for science with its lack of intuition. Isn't that astounding? Science can never prove consciousness is real, all the way through from conception to action, because the scientific method has no way to confirm anything without piggybacking on our own intuition in the end at the moment of collection of all the findings (in the final thought, the analysis, the intuition which ties serial thinking in parallel). In computing, multiple threads "join" at the end of a session of some computing work. In scientists' minds, they have to use intuition (unwittingly) to form a coherent thought of any conclusion: Judging. Judging is convergence. Without judging, which is to say without intuition's parallel use of thoughts in parallel, science would be impossible. You can't collect data forever and then not use the mind to act on it with parallel judging. Neither can you collapse parallel thinking in any capacity to sets of linear thinking! Consciousness, relying on the unconscious' parallel execution of highly refined conceptual models of thought, invariably is a parallel thinking process. Science will never trace that out into parallel biological cellular activities, since Mind doesn't originate from cellular activities and spinal fluid and Neuroscience Conceptions of the brain portions - and all that is far too convoluted to ever produce clear analytical thoughts in the first place! What infinite odds and ends do you have to resolve in an entire human body of cellular "causation" and inter-linkage? What splits and joins where? Where is the conceptual rules to make it one way and not another, consistently-reliably? As ever, science has no explanation for this, only endless data from brain scans which it can do absolutely nothing with. Materialists expect that they can just simulate a brain and it will automatically do something interesting for them! It never occurred to them that in computing you have to analytically define exactly what you want to happen across every single circumstance, i.e. ultimately computer programming is the most highly conscious human activity bar thinking, mathematics, philosophy and psychology. Your mathematical modelling of what you want to do and the contingent forms of what's possible have to be solid. Programming isn't an activity that materialists would do well in, in any more capacity than a technical and engineering role (which autistic hackers excel at, but they are often atheistic materialists).
319
320
321
322Do you remember that when you were a child, everything seemed endlessly wondrous and unlistable? And when you were a teenager, phenomena in life still seemed to be endlessly variant, as though no conception could truly group things to make proper sense of them on another further, meta-thought level. But when you find ontological mathematics, everything does have a category: phenomena, types of phenomena, concepts, domains.. in however which way you want to think of them! All categories within everyday life now have a place. When you were a child you couldn't conceptualize about how to group these things (philosophy, art, sports, politics, sex, travel, computer programming) but now you have conceptualizations on higher meta-levels which make things much clearer. Angels do. Thinking becomes clearer for some when humanity spreads the best mostly highly conscious knowledge.
323
324How you want to think about them/it = how your sinusoids each, in parallel, arrange themselves (at parallellism) around a circle; a point of reference given by parallellism (the circle always, as an analog, helps denote a point of reference, which is all the mystery to how we can say things are both above and beyond; under and over; underbelly and overworld and underworld; underthreaded; interwoven; underused; oversight; overseeing some process versus overlooking someone’s behaviour (“turning a blind eye”); underplaying your skills while being underhanded; overestimating; being surrounded front, left and centre; seeing beyond; “over and through”; “over and out”; and so on and so on. It’s how you can have phrasings like “later on in this book” versus “earlier on in this book”; or equally, “lower down in the book” versus “higher up in the book”. This is the same as to say that concepts are piecemeal directional qualifiers of conceptual significance (conceptual contents!). When we qualify a phrase with more (or less) words, we’ve irrevokably changed its implied structure and its implied contextual meaning. (Such is the character and function and nature of writing words and letters, remember).
325
326The point of symmetry (its pointedness) is to describe and express. Symmetry is always parallel, by definition (definitionally). Symmetry always comes in parallel. Consider what you’d have if you didn’t have symmetry, but your parallel mind was still processing some action – this is categorically impossible for reasons of building substance into the mental acts of thought at-scale which is more than “one-dimensional” or three-dimensional as in empiricism’s view of spacetime. Intuition is thinking in parallel, and you categorically must be able to use intuition to tell things like when to hang up on the phone, when to make new life choices, when all bets are off with various life activities. The only possible degree of difference (discern) can be how we are conscious and what we are conscious of. This is necessarily mandated by ontology and the PSR – since, definitionally, to have a mind and think some parallel thoughts (intuitions) at some times, means that you are categorically always doing so (your eternal mind can’t ever be “switched-off”, but it can only run losing cases).
327
328“[Trinity:] Knock, knock, Neo.”
329
330 - The Matrix (1999)
331
332
333
334
335Scientific materialism is farcial because it will never be able to explain how humans or ants from different individual circumstances and trails of experience start to share the same common noumenal conceptualizations. The obvious answer is that reality doesn't run entirely on percepts and interactions of random indeterminable wavefunction collapses upon percepts (which would present an impossible problem of how we can choose actions which are both uniquely individual and which congregate on common constellated concepts), but instead, there are no problems with determinism because each monad links its own conceptions of sinusoidal contents with what it's doing, thus freeing it totally from being completely driven by mere physically modellable circumstantial interactions/references. Different primitive human tribes didn't suffer the problems of having unique experiences; in fact, this was the beginning of the flight from bicameralism and the rise of consciousness. To science and empiricism, there can be no distinction such as consciousness if the only thing you can transcend is your current circumstances and by complete accident and randomness of the wavefunction. Scientists attribute conscious acts and their whole causation to material percepts and the so-called “indeterminable” wavefunction collapse – instead of wholly conceptual consciousness – just as the religious nuts thank their imaginary creator god for a surgeon's masterwork. The surgeon did it, not your imaginary creator god, and it's due to consciousness and free will and the monadic mathematical soul in the noumenal frequency domain – where lower band frequencies only are permitted to even function as spacetime percepts.
336
337Once the god within has infolded its contents (over infinite sinusoidal-signal range), it relationally uses these to “kick” itself “afloat to shore”, in massively parallel, directionally self-referential ways. All thought must have this property or there must be some sufficient reason why some reasoning (rationality) is so binding while other reasoning isn’t so. The only possible resolution (as in Descartes’ mind-body problem of resolving contradictions in things towards a single prime universal substance that surely underlied everything in the universe consistently) is that mind innately, definitionally and inherently is always continuously acting out the property of reasoning, to then contingently maximize its experiences (analytically defined from even the stage cellular life(!)) and outcomes based on a broad-sheet, broad-band set of infinite sinusoids which can be massively configured in parallel to constitute nonlinear thought. Think of how animals in jungles and rainforests don’t robotically carry out instructions of navigation wholly raised by sunlight shafts of interruption; noises; sounds (dominant/daring pigeons in the street!); the tastes of food. If sugar for example overpowered and possessed animals, they would simply constantly search for more sugar and die of sugar overdoes, which is plainly and emphatically not happening. Life isn’t one-dimensional but it’s multidimensional; just as no one aspect of what defines us (comfort, social standing) ever has precedence over the choosings we style. Thinking has abstract and conceptual powers precisely because it’s multidimensional, parallel and symmetrically massively convergable upon idealized goals. The only possible strict ontological distinction between animal souls and human souls is their flight of conscious supersymmetry (i.e. symmetry of a high accord of scale, within the same parallel form of inflexion, is what constitutes super symmetry). There is no “room at the inn” for an extra forever-extension for animal sentience versus human brainpower, and this is for precisely the same reason that we can’t tack-on extra “scientific” Infinite Regress spokes for why everything in the world takes on a slightly different form in phenomena. The universe doesn’t have additional new dialectical incrops for every last possible variance in the shifting phenomena of a Tesla Coil, for example – that would be absurd and undefinable. But what we can say of course with it being well-formed, is that the universe can mathematically compose highly mathematically perplexing shapes, in the form of phenomena via noumena (percept via concept in the essential ultimate sense) because of the categorical way that ontological mathematics functions and performs.
338
339
340Bees shown to conceptually understand the number zero. Science quote
341
342math the geat mustety, get the reasch notes, sugar cube lemurs.
343
344
345
346
347If you look at a chair with a mesh back to it, and if it has holes in, you can twirl the chair and it will reveal to your eyes a very strange “coffee swirl pattern” or “animal fur patterning” or “photoshop clouds filter” type pattern. The reason for this, and the reason why these are similar to the resonance experiments and sound frequency in water videos on youtube, is because as mathematics in parallel swirls and rotates, it always delivers a further, reflected “meta-pattern”. This is the undeniable inarguable property of mass parallellized frequency. Frequency never comes in singular form; always parallel. The amazing thing about existence here is that our minds are actually so powerful enough now that we can distinguish individual numbers (sinusoids) so well! Who knew high school math was that amazing?! How about that.
348
349
350
351What do angels want? For humans, this is a loaded question pandering to the Id drive; the pleasure principle. Angels don't want for anything Earthly or individualistic; it would have occurred to them that in any human story, there is a vast lacking in substance (i.e. story characters can never account for solid character defined by reality), and as such, all human interaction much the same, holds very little meaning for an angel. If you were an angel, you wouldn't even be able to tell anyone when you became an angel. This is exactly what happened to Simon Magus. His rationality outstipped everyone else's around him so much that he instantly saw the futility in interacting with them any further, as they couldn't hope to reach divinity yet and it's always something the soul reaches for in itself, not through others. (And no amount of guilt or empathy bridges this). Simon Magus must have intuitively glimpsed the runaway velocity of how ancient his own soul was in view of every other around him (or how far he’d unnaturally been stretched by the Holy Grail). In the end we are here to learn about ourselves, and this being the key execution of the monad, is the utility of the god archetype in the monad; the god within; ascension.
352
353All dialectical advances on God Game Planets must be “organic”. People must believe that it arose from human minds. Which it authentically does, excepting the very last absolute necessities of circumstance (“Exigent circumstance”).
354
355“An exigent circumstance, in the criminal procedure law of the United States, allows law enforcement, under certain circumstances, to enter a structure without a search warrant or, if they have a "knock and announce" warrant, without knocking and waiting for refusal. It must be a situation where people are in imminent danger, evidence faces imminent destruction, or a suspect's imminent escape. Once entry is obtained, the plain view doctrine applies, allowing the seizure of any evidence or contraband discovered in the course of actions consequent upon the exigent circumstances.” 
356
357- Wikipedia
358
359This is where the variables of contigency supplying (suspending you in) normal social order have collapsed, dropped out of the equation, because the divine principal concepts running the planet were infringed by human will, or because the civilization got to a point where inventions like a mass food production revolution were maximally going to help souls on that planet individuate (compared to the option of doing nothing). Gods and angels, we can surmise, always act out of such “irreducible”, pure and “sincere” strands of thought. They are thinking with us, and they are always far, far ahead! They are far more Present.
360
361Angels consistently and continuously see room for improvement; they are focused on knowing the most at the highest possible level. This is where intuition reaches in all domains of life. The most intuitive fly off and leave everyone else behind, because it is not possible to bring others with you as they must learn for themselves. Intuitives who are extroverts can go for jobs that prey on the unintuitive. Our choices depend on how conscious we are of absolute ontological mathematics. We can only become free by becoming most conscious. There is nothing more to be said beyond doing, thinking, having highly conceptual thoughts that make everything clear. That is why the highest humans are geared towards sharing the most clear-cut judging thoughts, rather than perceiving thoughts: we are about making things happen as fast as possible, rather than taking longer which is effectively wasting time when viewed in the appropriate context. People will never get it, but it's enough that we got it ourselves. Angels know this acutely. Angels are beyond emotion, misplaced guilt, complacency, inaction.
362
363
364
365If you were an angel, there's nothing you'd want to do surrounding bewitching humans or making them like you. Those of lesser intuition don't have anything to expand your mind, unless you have a particularly healthy connection with them. Angels prefer their own company and the clarity of their own minds gazing on new phenomena. Angels love fresh thoughts. Angels cannot see any positive threads in interacting with humans, by and large. Imagine if you'd grown to see every type of story there is, and you never met anyone so highly intuitive that they'd instantly know what you would come up with. Angels aren't fun, because thinking is precise and to-the-point so hard and fast that it's all beyond the humanistic concepts like masculinity, wonder, magic, thrill, drama, fun, interest -- all these things are reflections of interdependency and interaction from the range of other souls' wants and needs. Angels are the least other-directed, because they are concerned with what must happen and the most generalized sublime thoughts of existence. Angels have chosen to know reality rather than be swept up by it in a mythos-oriented, sensory way. This is the apex and height of choices to do with relationships between monads. Angels want themselves, not others. Angels never get lonely. Angels can draw from several lifetimes' worth of memories, but their unconscious minds are so aggressively intact that they can facilitate and provide all sorts of unconscious soothing and comforting via anima/animus figures - except, of course, their minds are of such a mathematical cast that they don't need any such non-mathematical gesturing. Angels are logos minds; they are speedy thinkers and they have barely any limitations left on their thoughts -- so why would they be caught in circumstances that made them emotional (despairing/losing)? Angels, just like gods and Illuminists, have access to every kind of emotion and sentimentality and sensuality; every bit of compassion and empathy and gentleness and dominance that they want to express, but they rarely see any use for it as it's human estimation which provides these suboptimal processes we see in human life. Modern humans are rarely happy, since they mess each other around so much and can barely be consistent or conscious enough to define what they even want in relationships. The humans of the next few centuries will be far improved. We barely had electricity 100 years ago.
366
367Electricity was invented from concepts (hinting at the highest level of conception being foundational the higher up you go in reality). It's concepts, not percepts, that bring to bear the distance of travel from domain to domain and context to context, striding along vast stretches of percepts and spatiotemporal distances. Concepts travel the world. Percepts can't travel. Percepts can't even think. How can science possibly explain the biological clockwork of world-reaching inventions!? It's an absurd subject of study. You cannot mix universals (electricity works because of mathematics) and particulars and say that particulars caused the transmission of universals. That's a category error, because the particulars were brought about by the universals, not the other way around. All percepts are particulars which were generated by and from universals. But the key is in the conceptual nature of existence: there was no process; no events. There are no true events in ontological mathematical reality itself. All the events we separate and cordon-off are of our own subjective conceptual predilection. This is the wonder and the mathematical constitution of concept: we can conceptually model our own conception of what is happening, without it being part of a distinct, existentially-promoted cause-and-effect loop. We ourselves produce the raw final outer-layer products of reality (sinusoidal thoughts), which are thereby compatible and requisite and interchangeable with other such products made in the same ontological form by other monads (concepts, and percepts being simply arrayed conceptual dimensional patternation) and in this way we can eventually manipulate matter!
368
369In the ontological wavefunction collapse, every soul submits its own results of mathematical conception of thought. Angels and gods get first dibs on the cosmic spatiotemporal domain, so if they wanted to, the gods could reset everything just like a parent can stop paying for their childrens' game accounts or set time limits on the Internet usage. In existential terms, the souls with more rational power get to reshape everything by virtue of raw mathematical rational power. Besides Satan and Lucifer, there just aren't any souls that gain massive raw mathematical power like that. Most embodied souls are preoccupied with sensory, intuitive and emotional aspects of embodied life.
370
371
372
373Monads use conceptual existence and conceptualization to select a varying refined selection of concepts that they want to materialize (commit) into the shared spatiotemporal domain. It's through this generalized unconscious and conscious functioning that we even move our bodies. It's in this that we multitask. None of this has to do with particulars and percepts, and this is all due to concepts having predominance over what they select next, via monads. Monads work with concepts; they work in, through and via concepts. Concepts, conceptual unconscious math, is real and alive! It's just that the static, piecemeal range of mathematics is never what you'd ever encounter in isolation, as if it was eternally abstract and fixed. You have the inside of mathematics as your feelings, desires, intuitions and goals, with the outside of mathematics as the objective ways in which you can tell things are happening when you think in abstract in conscious ways, or where you interact with the outside world mathematically.
374
375Particulars (percepts) cannot think. All that can ever happen in a rational PSR type universe, is that the ultimate agents of agency and free choice (monads) can freely cross-compare and cross-compose sinusoidal conceptual information (sinusoidal thoughts) with which they can bring to bear the maximal possible range of expression and utility assuming they're capable of wielding the appropriate puzzle-pieces to become what they must in accordance with absolute perfection; absolute consciousness; absolute contingent utility within the society and the embodied life. Conceptual existence allows this.
376
377Conceptual existence is analytically far superior to any other possible existence (which couldn't exist anyway; couldn't be well-defined) because it allows our monads to compose whatever is of the basis absolute sinusoidal range (sinusoids of infinite numbers, infinite negative numbers, infinite imaginary numbers, infinite negative imaginary numbers) and this is available to help define everything which is happening in a shared spatiotemporal domain, and we can refine our selections by conceptual self-analysis, conceptual cross-checking, conceptual cross-comparison and conceptual cross-validation (via myriad conceptual middleman or black-box processes, including things of "pure phenomena" like computer programming and art). What is one step removed can also be estimated and figured-out and generalized, given as a nature of conceptual existence being fully completely mathematically defined and conceptually complete (therefore “transparent in transmission of reflection”). All that's left is to become conscious!
378
379Conceptual existence allows any percept to be modelled by infinite variations on conceptual configuration. Just look around you (intuitively): all the personalities of monads you've ever met and experienced, are themselves particular instantiations of conceptual mathematics. In the far future, nearer The Omega Point, we will even be able to revisit past experiences as though we can step through them like highly detailed movies. You could say hypothetically we would be able to simulate personalities that used to belong to other souls - but this is false, because not only do angels not desire to take personalities from other planets and play with them; but we won't have anyone interesting enough around us at that time that it becomes meaningful. It mathematically expands or collapses to zeroed meaning. Angels are only benefitting from such problems; imagine if you only went further and further, and you only understood more as you went along. That's not a loss. Angels in reality may be the most boring beings in the universe for most of us, but that's our own limits of conceptualization not the angels'. The angels aren't losing anything. They have become conscious. That is always enough. It crosses the bounds far beyond what experience, validation, acceptance, inclusivity could ever provide. This is the gem of genius. It is indescribable in sentimentalities; emotion; semantics. It is beyond these things because life isn't one-dimensional, but sinusoidal and conceptual and mathematical. When an angel soul understands all of human life via a pristine overarching understanding of ontological mathematics, it isn't beholden to the same rules anymore. It has become free in exactly the way that your soul burns with a fire to escape precedent. You always knew you were different. You always knew there was a deeper purpose. What do you think will happen when you "find yourself"? It ranges and steps up somewhat because then you are finding god. You go through the trials of contingency, but eventually you end up being conscious and able enough to find and express whatever you want. When a soul has reached godhood, there is literally no more possible curiosity for that monad. It has mathematically unlocked all the means to get from anywhere A to any destination B. It has become conscious of exactly how, roughly speaking, and with all likelihood, it can get to know something it isn't currently aware of. A god is the ultimate mover of information. It has been said that all computers do is move data around (data is information without meaning). Minds are the ultimate processors of all kinds of mathematical waves, and in parallel because Mind has access to all sinusoids at once! Computers ultimately can't even add 5.1 and 6 million point 3 without suffering a whole host of underlying roundabout methods to deal with things that aren't straight bitwise operations. Computers struggle with large numbers, but Mind has direct and clear pristine access to every possible number and frequency in existence. That's how you can feel and touch things and taste new foods and feel the wind in your face on a sunny trail walk.
380
381Conceptual existence means that any and all aspects of our existence is open to exposure by thought, language and consideration. Thinking exposes life for what it is, its beauty and what it could be (thinking intuitives' imagination). Thinking is the Grail Object of life, but you have to find the precise conceptual models by which you are to conduct and coordinate your life, which is what's so hard on Archon Planets. The logic of this is that you will benefit far more than souls on Phoster Planets by the time the table (planet) flips. Some escape velocity has to be manufactured by the "first wave" souls. The Pioneers' Pioneers are those who go out to seek further beyond where anyone had ever gone before; the land without a charted map.
382
383
384
385What is the purpose of concepts? It's the purpose of the soul and existence which is being proposed here; the contingent use of particular concepts serves the use of contingent, given, provisional purposes. When you crunch up something in your hand and it folds in on itself, the purpose served is the contingent purpose between what the mind wants and what is happening. We can say no more about this in such a generalized scope. The concept is the specific concept, composed by the mind of sinusoids. It's a contingent concept for it to be a thought (meaning, it has no eternal necessary existence). The thing being crunched up acts as if being crunched up or folded; its atoms take the form of being crunched up; and this must be something that takes form from the mind that produced it - since it's our own mind that caused this to happen due it being an uncaused cause and thus, it must have modelled that type of form in mind. The spatiotemporal realm of matter is interlinked with the frequency domain of mind, and this must be true if we are genuinely and authentically interacting with the spatiotemporal domain a lot (even if at any point in time; doesn't necessarily have to be all the time). Since we are impressing some of our unconscious thoughts into committed spatiotemporal outputs (all bodily activities are usually unconscious), our unconscious thoughts must already mirror the actual exact forms of what we want to do - or else, where do any revisions come from? Is there some kind of mathematical magical barrier of change? No! - The secret is that lowest souls fill in the “inside” gaps within the conception - we already unconsciously know the means to synthesize multiple bodily functions (sinusoidal patterns that move our muscles!) into a single commit to the objective spatiotemporal domain. It's just that we are never conscious of the precise mathematics to do this. If we are getting conscious of it then we can isolate out the individual commits and play with them (e.g. rolling your tongue). Humans who aren't conscious of this could never do this. That is the test this insofar in becoming conscious of committing to the shared collective wavefunction. There are of course much deeper more conscious levels of consciousness that we will figure out in due course.
386
387Unconscious vs. conscious: when you walk around in society. None of this is supposed to be consciously thought of and considered with vigilance and selection. That is where you enter the domain of anxiety. Anxiety is related to overthinking things you cannot change in your current capacity. A world without anxiety is a world where everyone's complaints of human need are heard and adapted-for in the most sensible ways for positive liberty social integration (New World Order of reason and logic).
388
389
390
391Conceptual existence gives us the mathematical freedom to define what we want: the full range of life is settled and satisfied ontologically by the mathematical sinusoidal composition of different basis thoughts, to deliver us all through to the most complex sophisticated life acts involving all of our personality encapsulated as mathematical functions. This is only possible in mathematics. Nothing else could express your sexuality, your compassion, your rationality, your commitment to long-term abstract goals like mathematics can. Sinusoidal expressions give us this capacity and breadth and bandwidth of expression. We are then continuously adapting this over each day and through many lifetimes. We are eternally committing changes to this mathematical expression. When we hit conscious control over what we're doing in grand extent, we become god, because we are able to find the symmetry-giving operations mathematically with no input from any other monad. We are able to relentlessly optimize our own soul and figure out all the secrets to existence. All of this has to be possible within the same strand (ontological form) of existence. All of this must be the eternal template with contingent content fit inside it. Of course in reality, there is no such things as containers (these are just more flawed, loose contingent concepts we use to explain things to ourselves as we work over the words, the percepts, with our souls, conceptually guiding ourselves to correction).
392
393It's in the whole sentence that the concept fully takes shape. The qualifiers and the contextual conceptual pointers provide hints to this. Dreams and screenwriting are about using an overarching context to deliver a moving semantic message. The best dreams deliver a syntactical Higher Self message about the next stages for individuation. The best dreams are where the Self is becoming conscious of its higher nature inside of the dream. Angels cannot dream because they are too conscious.
394
395
396
397Are you free from the script of human life? Are you free of the conditioning? Which is to say - are you conscious?
398
399
400
401
402Concepts must precede percepts but it is impossible to universally link concepts (eternal, universal, analytical, necessary) and percepts (temporal, particular, provisional, transient) via causational determinism because they are separate categories. One is a priori ontological Form while the other is a posteriori ontological Content. You cannot discuss concept-percept interaction outside of the full context in which it takes place, since this is neither purely conceptual thinking (ontological content thinking about form) nor is it fully parallel, symmetrical thinking to cover all of the details' permutations. This is because of the nature of conceptual thinking and what it can and cannot achieve. You cannot explore thought and Mind without wavefunction collapse, which is what science fallaciously attempts to do.
403
404This has to do with the nature of ontological content, i.e. where we find it, the state we find it in and the utility-contexts projected upon it (since these are always provisional and given and contextual and highly particularized). Ontological content (always strictly sinusoidal thoughts) have both an objective (expression) and subjective (impression) quality. Shared visually appealing art is a clear example of how our emotions and sentimentalities can be dazzled by something that is, "in the end", produced as an objective compositional act. Yet subjectivity was weaved within the artistic flow itself. Feelings, impressions, ideals and projections were counselled in composing them. We dreamed in human images as we created it. With music composition, you can feel your feelings turning into piano notes, but we are then left with this rolling unfolded presentation as objective content in the universe. Autumn Leaves is a gentle example of this in jazz piano.
405
406Humans' concepts on their own cannot facilitate the full flowing range of phenomena for sublime, moving thoughts that remind us of the beauty of life and what we fight for. Concepts such as beauty, finesse and numinosity have to be filled-out and expanded by percepts. For angels, this is not a problem because their monads (the basis unit of all ontological reality) express and impress highly symmetrical ontological contents. But for us, we must experience things that our conceptualizations cannot bring us to conceptual grasp of just yet. For animal monads, content provided externally via the senses is extremely important for building their conceptual knowledge up unconsciously, as it is brought to their intuitions. For angels and the highly logos oriented humans, no amount of percepts can usually change our minds, and we are rigidly committed to our predictions about future events and their objective implications.
407
408Percepts no more inform the concepts than the concepts under greater PSR order see it symetrical to fit them in somewhere. The lower is always synthesized and called-up by the higher. Human hierarchies and the military are the crude expression of PSR order. You never organize the higher by the lower, or clout by taste, purely because this is the least optimal configuration. We can know that the military doesn't go on strike purely and only through the PSR, with exceptions that flout and flex the PSR. There will never be an empirical test or proof for this, since proof is strictly conceptual and derivable from thinking about conceptual nature and structure (Ontological mathematics, or Illuminism, is the study of the structure and nature of reality).
409
410What do we have to unite concepts and percepts? Mind, the monad, and the PSR, and the wavefunction collapse. Mind can only operate via the PSR. It must maximize its outcomes at all times.
411
412
413
414Monads are inside of true reality, apart from the abstractional context we are dealing with in pure, contingent conceptual thought by building contingent thoughts right here via these sentences. Monads thus can express what they want, which could only ever be of an eternal order aside from a strictly linear, ad-hoc, non-universally-multilateral type of causation. Monads have at their disposal both (1) the subjective, qualitative inner vacuum free from externalities of causation and evaluation and (2) the objective, committed domain of expressed objective quantity and solidity. Dual aspect monism, via eternal pristine collections of sinusoids (concepts), furnishes this mechanism because of how there's nothing extra required for all monads to interrelate this way. All monads are instantiations of the same form, the god equation and the PSR-governed collection of sinusoids ready to be composed into thoughts continuously in an uninterrupted, eternal stream.
415
416We live in a PSR universe and nothing you were ever told to assume or presume had any weighting of determination over that. Your knowledge did not create or give rise to the ontological form of the universe; you had impressions and thoughts which drew you to certain understandings but this was all according to some grand cosmic shared principle, for there to ever even be minds in multitude interacting. The alternative is chaos and undefined existence.
417
418The Shadow, the inner animal in us all, searches for meaning and purpose but in benighted, fallen, lazy and unconscious ways. In the darkest recesses of the monad there reside all the demons we didn't and couldn't deal with, which still have a hold over us in our dreams, fantasies and complexes and neuroses. In the far future, the souls most resembling angels will be able to help each other individuate in a totally calming, accepting, cooperative embrace, resembling the pure anima/animus. This is the thinking intuitives' conception of hyperrational sacred love and devotion. It is an archetype. There are stories which build semantically on this archetype! What are the deepest, most treasured stories and archetypes to you? Which are the most divine and pure of spirit?
419
420A young girl made a wish to Santa at the mall, and Santa responded by beating her uncle. When we take the role of archetypes, they have a power over us which can be numinous and highly sacred. When people en masse tune into the populist archetype, they are beholden to the eternally sacred will of the people, which is a concept.
421
422The key with intuition is not to prize it so much that you become narrowminded and get tunnel vision. Conceptual ideals of a peaceful ordered existence stress that you are to be happy and content, and enjoy your life and get good experiences, which means a sensory focus and a disconnect from the extroverted world of intuited detail of phenomena on a mass scale. Don't be weighed down by your wings. Think powerfully, but also take the benefits of calm and order. You know the future is introverted.
423
424For reality to express the best flowing variations in quality thoughts and feelings for minds, it must be animated and varying. Concepts yield the benefit of selecting the types of variations, their forms, their sources and the configuration of them. This produces the best of both "static" concept and "static" phenomena/percept. Percepts are given voluminous detail to their animated form, which, as we become more conscious and ascended, we generalize the power over to a generally adaptable end. When you know the noumena which produced the visual elements in a piece of digital art, you don't produce detailed reconstructions but you do gain a generalized understanding that produces better informed outputs in future, according with the exact thoughts which were produced. If this wasn't true, then artists couldn't learn from percepts and being inspired visually. But artist begins entirely with visual, perceptual inspiration or being inspired to imitate visual acuity or colour. They draw from within their selector function the actual mathematical concepts they habitually use, and these are mathematically refined and reflected as the artist creates and works. Nietzsche said only the doer learns. Working creatively involves an unconscious shaping and thus learning process. Think of the sculptors creating busts and statues in ancient Athens.
425
426What do we mean when we say, "be very careful with this"? It's an objective expression of an individually-derived principle of taking some outermost precautions and checks on what we are doing, curtailing the moment with additional mindful calculation to intercept possible dangers. The concept snaps us back at the higher conceptual level of evaluation, and we pay more unconscious mathematical attention to the inner branches of mathematical conceptual integration. This isn't possible via percepts; only concepts.
427
428"After much diligent research, aided by other women, I gradually came to understand that beneath the familiar Goddesses of the patriarchy, there is a much more ancient Goddess." - Carol P. Christ
429
430"Who comprehends her? With whom can one consult concerning this great goddess?" - Ludwig van Beethoven
431
432The Goddess can appear to you as part of a numinous or archetypal experience as you wonder about the world and your purpose within it and what it is missing. She may call you to defend her world, which is your world in crisis. This is a contingent concept maintained and advanced by monads all over the universe. Mystical intuitives and atheists and abrahamists can't have such experiences, as they involve thinking and intuition together.
433
434Does your soulmate exist somewhere out there on another planet in another galaxy? Do you have multiple close-fit soulmates in this regard? The Goddess can even reflect the highest abstractmost reflections of this kind of principle: sacred anima/animus work; divine retribution; divine perfection; divine compassion; restoration of the highest feminine order (which is where it intersects rationality and masculinity, in symmetry).
435
436"All great movements are popular movements. They are the volcanic eruptions of human passions and emotions, stirred into activity by the ruthless Goddess of Distress or by the torch of the spoken word cast into the midst of the people." - Adolf Hitler
437
438
439
440"You cannot create experience. You must undergo it." - Albert Camus
441
442What he means here is that percepts coincide and conspire collectively against your own private rolling experience of such percepts and such objective mathematical formulations posed by the monadic collective. You cannot decide what that process will be in the near future (unless you are an angel). The experience happens to you; encloses upon you and encases and surprises you with your unrefined estimations, not the other way around. For angels it's fundamentally different, because, events and human inventions of schema and suchlike removed, angel monads simply aren't acting in any way framed so as to be subject to the same contingent rules and concepts as expressed by the sleepy monads controlling matter. Angels think powerfully in parallel, but they can fundamentally mathematically resist other monads' mathematical contributions to the shared dream anyway because angel monads' mental activity is more symmetrical and faster on the whole. The only thing permitting this differentiation is the only thing permissible at this most irreducible level: the difference among individual monads' contents. And as we may then expect, this one "special pleading" then has the most enormous ramifications and consequences; the most divine and the most free degree of difference.
443
444Concepts are utilized by monads, but there is no straight-and-narrow pursuit of perceptual goals outside of space and time and yet totally linear; totally undefined by the interaction of the wavefunction collapse and the monadic collective and their sinusoids and the PSR. Such a thing is conceptually absurd. All we can ever say of percepts, of the highest conceptual order of thought, relates to concepts and conceptualization and conceptual existence. We can't definitively say highly useful things about bread, or ducks, if we want to reach the best clarity of thought, which must be conceptual and must maximize in view of future outcomes. This is given by the PSR.
445
446Monads use selection processes, which are conceptual, to produce thoughts. We come across percepts and then we refine these conceptual thoughts by comparing them to how otherwise we use our sinusoids in view of this. Percepts mathematically make impressions on us, and this must be further selected-for and filtered-upon to arrive at any conceptual shifting organism of mental life and mind. Life requires that we can conceptually adapt ourselves in view of and in spite of percepts. Percepts must come close to defining what we like, but we must also be completely detached from them in the most essential sense. You wouldn't think some collection of Internet links or favourite 90s movies or quotes from writers defines you; and this is the trail of percepts across your life. If someone leaves a glove on the street, we can be flooded with human images of this monad and its wishes, but that is an entirely fabricated image because the soul doesn't even have physical appearance; this is all grossly elongated projection of will and other mathematics. Percepts surround concepts, but concepts remain free from percepts in the most essential sense, because the selector function and the mental agency belong to the monad - or rather, they come with the monad, because nothing belongs to anything, which reveals human contingent concepts (there is such a word on all Higher Life planets).
447
448Concepts can make use of percepts because percepts are nothing other than transformed reflections of concepts! Think of how, in some of your dreams or hypnopompia, the visual depictions of people can be highly visually detailed as if they are actual photographs. When you have seen enough pictures of people, your mind can generalize the visuals. You can picture in your mind's eye people you used to know and go to school with. A god can reconstruct things as it pleases exactly because every single instance of phenomena (peoples' travel photos) are simply parallel arrayed expressions of eternal pristine sinusoids (percepts) which every mind has innate access to. We are all directly interacting with visible spacetime mathematics (filtered by our senses) and once inside the monad, we turn them into collapsed subjective, rolling unfolding continuous estimations of subjective and objective interpretation.
449
450Concepts of our refined ideals for life are exactly how we are living and figuring it out and differentiating what we don't want these to be from what we do want these to be, and exactly where and under what circumstances and exactly how these should vary. We move with the concepts we have in order to individuate them and shift ourselves to the god position in the most abstract, transcendental mathematical dance. We have to figure out what we adore; how best to serve ourselves in all dimensions; how best to serve objective long-range goals and how to fit this all into the changing circumstances and parameters of the world and its response to us. The chief principal goal here is rational individuation. You don't need to become absolutely perfect, but you earn clarity of mind and a better future lives' potential.
451
452"Wavefunction collapse, as envisaged by physicists, is actually a preposterous concept. Given that all things are interconnected within a cosmic wavefunction, it doesn’t make any sense to talk of local parts of the wavefunction collapsing. Either the whole cosmic wavefunction collapses, or none of it collapses." - Mike Hockney
453
454Wavefunction collapse is incredibly important to understand. All monads think together and collapse their own wavefunction individually, producing a changed output signal defined mathematically for all the other monads to percieve. Come alone, we could say sinusoids are eternal concepts and thoughts are particular sinusoidal compositions; but it's the presence and resurgence of thoughts, not the qualityof thoughts which makes them objective for us to resist (or is it?). Angels produce the highest quality thoughts thus they don't meddle with human affairs excepting the ideal cases.
455
456It is also not possible to have thoughts or expressions without a well-defined irreducible substrate (the Singularity of minds, which then collapse based on the colletive wavefunction presentation). The PSR holds all of this together (when we think about it all properly) and a universe of mind would not be possible outside of this exact configuration with other minds. There can be nothing that is not irreducible; there can be nothing that goes misunderstood ultimately by all minds (this could not be a true well-defined existence). Godhood must be built into existence, or there is no direction to go towards and no well-defined ontological form. Whatever is present must be present all the way through, and accessible in all "dimensions" (sinusoids) to produce contingent concepts and contingent percepts. We live by and through the phenomenal and noumenal world generated by these percepts and concepts, and we can intelligiby grasp the nature and structure of reality thanks to this (again; thanks is not an eternal necessary concept that can ever exist).
457
458Reality could not exist without minds that produced thoughts in this becoming way, eternally, predominant to space and time. Monads are, in relation to space and time: precursory; preceding. Our thoughts are entwined and enmeshed with space and time, but also a lack of space and time. We are foundationally free from this, and it's only Earthly circumstance (noumenal forms in minds) which holds us back.
459
460The key is always in how we think. When we drill down into it, we can become more careful, more graceful, more refined and more measured. You have a mind and you need to be conscious of how to use it.
461
462"Sharpen your pencil as you create the story of your life. Ask today as you consider the many choices in your view - what is the highest and best use of your talents, skills and abilities? When you answer that, seize the opportunity to sharpen those qualities even more sharply by applying your focused effort." - Mary Anne Radmacher
463
464Focus and sharpness are, as ever, only conceptually expressible. We host a wide range of concepts via our mind-space, and we enrich our understandings of these things as we pick and unpack to style our own shape of consciousness.
465
466
467
468How do you write? You figure out a way for it to be fun. Make it the most beautiful, satisfying, rewarding thing in your life. Make it healthy and pleasurable, in a balanced way. Individuate.
469
470
471
472Can you individuate your will away from being moved into action by present circumstance? Can you develop and hold it alone, as if it stood outside of your embodied life and Earthly circumstance? Angels can.
473
474
475
476"Societies need rules that make no sense for individuals. For example, it makes no difference whether a single car drives on the left or on the right. But it makes all the difference when there are many cars!" - Marvin Minsky
477
478Sinusoids, and contingent concepts and archetypes, wouldn't make any sense without many participants and a fully defined spatiotemporal domain by which to individuate. It's the application of objective patterns which actually drives subjectivity and conceptualization insofar as dialectical becoming. It's for this particular universe that we individuate, not eternal analytical necessity. The eternal order doesn't demand anything from us, in discordance with Buddhism and running against it; you cannot interact with something that has no contingent relationship with you. That's a category error. You can't connect with truth because it isn't a contingent thing; a construct and expression within the eternal ontological necessary form. Sinusoids, numbers, frequencies, are eternal necessary basis concepts. Through the contingent combination of them we are engaged in living, reasoning, experiencing and feeling. But these are always transient, volatile, shifting existents.
479
480Thoughts themselves are not truth. Truth is eternal, and truths of fact are interprative conceptual methods, and truth is modelled dialectically via the conceptual operation of the monad; its truth content reaches higher and higher ascensions. Truth cannot be perception-based (empiricism) because that is not universal or absolute. Conceptual contingency models sinusoidal supersymmetry, which is where a contingent arbitrary-contents mind has used its thinking capacity to think about noumenal ontological form. Technically the objective state of something has no information appliccable to it - but this is to betray the true higher conceptual order of existence; the Hegelian idea. Nothing ever truly is strictly objective only; it always has a subjective contextual capacity to it (found through the PSR) and it's our job to become conscious of the way this works. We live in a subject-object universe and we are always thinking; therefore true strict raw objectivity, contextless, in and of itself, cannot exist. Objectivity comes with subjectivity and vice versa. The spatiotemporal domain presents objective somethings (percepts) as a grand wavefunction we are connected to; but this only exists for subjects, rather than existing wholly of its own accord "separately". Remember that all contingent concepts, like separation, do not and cannot actually exist as ontological, eternal, necessary concepts.
481
482What drives the universe? There are no driving forces of agency pushing from outwhere. Causation must occur through all monads forever eternally, self-contained, and we can never deconstruct this as a process taking place (it never happened as a spacetime event); we can only reflect upon it via our private fluid exploration of pristine, eternal mathematical sinusoids. We think analytically to reflect the eternal and necessary; we feel and experience to enjoy the circumstantial and the transient and contingent.
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490The perfect radio show content ("You should write a book - I have") .. the problem with this is content IS conception. Content starts to pbecome conception for it to reach the highest subjectiuve, non-abrtriaty designational hehights of brillaince. Objectivity is what we share, where subjectivity is .. ontological form is ..
491
492
493
494The perfect msg to jkr.. because, it comes in context -> alwaysa crafte dfor another subject-object (monad)
495
496Other people who are inaccurate don’t deliver good .. for you → lie → .. by extension and indiractiojn, they .. 
497
498
499
500            alma deutscher quotes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19WORtE3xuM YouTube
501
502            Reincarnatin stuff.
503
504Synthesis is a natural process which is taking place all over thought. Synthesis is just thinking stepped up in a more resultantly effective way. Consciousness is a kind of synthesis. The more that we can reflect on the so-called "arbitrary" thoughts (really, different elements of sinusoidal frequency as corresponds individual circumstances and branches of conceptual rejoin), the more we are able to confirm-reflect and cross-check that these adjustments are solid. Thinking is the natural act of the monad, and synthesis could be no specially-elevated concept with a special case within thought, external to thought. All thought must take the same ontological form. Through our contingent thoughts, we are conceptually adjusting what exists as per what we would like to achieve. This is essentially achieved via a subject-object dichotomy (we experience expressive changes, and we deliver objective conceptual long-range adjustments and conceptually recognize them ultimately subjectively as well as objectively). No other ontological type of system could afford this. Consciousness is strictly and exclusively capable inside of a PSR type universe exactly as we have.
505
506Unconsciousness is the default state of mind, and consciousness is a particular contingent unfolding of ontological thoughts, whereby the elevation of other contents of mind has happened to throw up some subjective significance. Objective significance is part of what's used to weight and accord changes to our internal dynamics of mind.
507
508" The basic question for the mind is always, “What next?” The human mind is full of automatic processes, instincts, intuitions, reflective processes, deliberative processes, unconscious processes, conscious reflection, gut feelings, emotions, desires, will, and so on. All of this has to be sifted, evaluated, made sense of, and, finally, acted upon. Sometimes, we may have a lot of time at our disposal to weigh our options. At other times, we may have to act almost instantly, with precious little time to consider our decision. No machine could ever emulate this degree of complexity and sophistication."
509
510    Mike Hockney
511
512Objectively, sinusoids are their expressed concepts (quantity; frequency; concept; number). Subjectively, the weaved and interleaved expressions of sinusoids produce different mathematical results (percepts) in the monad, yielding something entirely else in particular which we can then learn to filter out (thanks to the Fourier transform and inverse Fourier transform) to isolate out the signals and properties and abstract characters of sinusoids that we want to promote or gain or integrate within other monadic conceptual spaces.
513
514"Consciousness operates on two things: 1) on the sense-space (i.e. it makes sense of what we perceive), and 2) on itself, on the mind-space, on the concepts it has created or discovered. Consciousness is always a reflective process, acting on something else ...
515
516"Consciousness converts sensory things into conceptual things. So, for example, we can look at a flower and see its sensory properties. Any animal can do that too. But only a human possesses the concept of "flower". A rabbit does not see the world in terms of concepts. It simply perceives the world. It doesn't conceive it. It doesn't convert the world, translate it, into concepts. Consciousness is this process of superimposing language over a perceptual substrate, of converting sensory observables into concepts that we can then manipulate and ponder entirely separately from immediate sense experience ...
517
518"In a world without consciousness, everything would be conducted purely archetypally, exactly as happens in the animal world. Consciousness gives us the opportunity to override archetypes. You cannot be genuinely free if you do not have this capacity. Many stupid people who imagine themselves free are in fact the puppets of archetypal forces, brainwashing and operant conditioning. They have an entirely false consciousness."
519
520    - Dr. Thomas Stark
521
522
523"The Real is ever-present, like the screen on which the cinematographic pictures move. While the picture appears on it, the screen remains invisible. Stop the picture, and the screen will become clear. All thoughts and events are merely pictures moving on the screen of Pure Consciousness, which alone is real. "
524
525    - Ramana Maharshi
526
527Consciousness achieves something that is conscious. It is self-reflective, and it also has the capacity within contingent thinking to reflect on analytic conceptual principles, as well as to navigate all of life. That is the supreme use of mind and thoughts. Consciousness is the supreme task of life, and god-consciousness is the final consciousness. When we become conscious of every which little way we interact and navigate our own lives, we will have eliminated all the mistakes and dialectical dead-ends just as we no longer fall when we walk or waste time on things that disserve us. Every act broadcasts an optimization if it is conscious enough. Certain mental contents are more apt and relevant and appropriate and flexible than others. If we live in a world of infinite possible variance of thoughts, then some are massively more powerful and there is no quick-and-easy conceptual outline of this. The concept is consciousness, but you will fill in your own detail of it as you grow to it in the capacity which you can serve it upon yourself. The angels and gods have the best, clearest most refined concept of consciousness.
528
529A designer knows he has achieved perfection not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away. - Antoine de Saint-Exupery
530
531The PSR is the ultimate beauty and perfection of design. That's because it is not itself a contingent thought, but an eternal necessary aspect of existence. It comes with the consciousness of the thoughts we produce. It is enlivened and embedded right through them where sinusoidal symmetry is properly present. Consciousness is always a meta reflection of the properties of existence then made available to thought.
532
533In individual life, we focus on converting first of all percepts to concepts (the mind-space), and this involves the contingent thoughts composed of sinusoids in varying styles and patterns, detailing the personal psyche. But as there is no sufficient reason to promote the individual over the many or the subjective over the objective or the contingent and temporal over the analytical and eternal, our thoughts of course can mix and match different mathematical structures and patterns as we please. This is the gift, the magic, of life. Math allows us to transcend from basis concepts to highly construed, protracted concepts, bringing to bear a finer mathematical clout and weight and clarity on our world. All of life is engaged conceptually (just think of politics; and just think of a thinking-intuitive's vocabulary chest, as if it were all the words displayed in a single point or even spread as an art set in a single room). Mind precedes matter! This should be obvious the more intuitive you get. And this is on Archon Planets. Life finds a way!
534
535The dual properties of mind as per personal vs. global; individual and temporal versus collective and universal, are of course due to the nature of the mathematical language of existence which allows pure concepts and no distinct particulars, levels and chains of scope or event or causation; no fixed ruleset apart from pure mental conception itself. The universe is pure concept, which supports giving rise to all the percepts and interactions and human framings of narratives that we could ever wish for. The ultimate supreme facility is the Hegelian idea; the pure concept. The PSR is the highest form of this. We will get no other. We can contingently grasp the ramifications of the PSR via our own mixed combinations and compositions of the eternal pristine sinusoids. They are pure, perfect, analytical, conceptual. They are the basis ingredients of all life. The PSR is a concept which is being reconstructed in our minds, since our basis concepts allow us to construct analytical thoughts to analytically retrace highly conceptual (broad-phase; long-range) statements.
536
537What we can do with ontological mathematics is we can wholly and thoroughly reconstruct vast swathes of noumenal phenomena (just as in the most vivid dreams) and then meta-reflect on the patterns that accord these elements. We can mathematically express everything we want to. A god knows acutely all about the ontological form of the universe - that isn't ever contested. These are analytical conceptual ways to get to know what's happening in the universe (conceptual analysis is all that counts for a god). Conceptual proofs are final, eternal and binding. All the human conditioning you have been put through is fighting your divine nature in this respect. Your divine nature is really that powerful! It took a world ran by complete soulless minds and everyone running their game code to even go up against you. You are still here. You are real; you are the real thing; the thing that's too real for other people.
538
539
540
541    something entirely else in particular which we can then learn to filter out
542
543    filter in
544
545
546Ocasio-Cortez’s psyche is much more elevated spiritually than someone such as Hillary Clinton’s, who resembles a more robotic, corrupt kind of “soul” and so in that sense, it wouldn’t of course count towards Ocasio-Cortez’s merit (we could call it her Geist or spirit or determination instead, which is not merit), and merit remains to be this: what you have done, and how good you are at it, the grander and more ambitious the better. We want to have a meritocratic society where everyone can aspire to work in the government because instead of us looking at celebrities, the government would aspire to be the best it could be and produce even better talent as it goes along and fixes big issues. Instead of a bureaucratic depressing mess, government should be inspiring and exciting, it should be about bright ambitious individuals and insightful people, and compassionate people.
547
548The dialectic necessitates that percepts are set out so that we can use them as thinking-food to build on them as material. Concepts use mathematical percepts to arrive at further conceptual arrangements of math or sinusoids;- visuals are arrays of mathematical information; information arrayed mathematically; words behold conceptual meanings which are reconstructed by consciousness according to their linear and grammatical organization. 1 - 1 = 0 is a conceptual mathematical expression. There are sinusoids and we combine them with different mathematical functions in our psyches and of the percepts gained from the environment, which affords us the opportunity to interact with what our percepts introduce to us (like the changing patterns of direction and speed across a visual input function). Every time we interact with spacetime, unconsciously our minds are having to process this spatial information (such as what's in your immediate peripheral vision, which is exploited in jumpscares in horror movies) and we have had to have been doing that to get here at this point in conscious evolution.
549
550Evolution: the mind advances in the consciousness aspect; percepts and experiences and mortal lives themselves never evolve! The only real conceptual difference that differentiates you to your most recent previous life is the difference in consciousness that your soul expresses. None of the experiences you have, in their qualitative quality in themselves, will ever count towards your Soul Progress at the end of this life. If the angels and gods judge you at the end (part of the romantic or religious idea of reincarnation is that gods promote the most meritocratic souls a bit, like Bernie's and Coryn's and Ocasio-Cortez's) then you will be measured in these terms; the terms of the spirit and the extreme rationality, rather than anything private or emotional or semantic. The ultimate product the gods and angels are looking for is excelling rational mathematical consciousness. If you are on the way towards divinity then you are already doing the very best you can for your world, and nothing less could rationally be preferred. If it goes the way of a biodiversity crisis or a nuclear armageddon, our souls will simply reincarnate on another Higher Life planet and their Dominant Extroverts will suffer the will of our planet's crises through us, the most willed and hyperrational souls; the guardian souls. Remember that reincarnation is a competition for bodies, so you will always be a human next time if you are sufficiently conscious enough.
551
552Early on at the very beginning of this book it was claimed that subjectivity and objectivity were irreducible any further (as in the essential element of Dual Aspect Monism;- the subject-object. The key thing is we aren’t talking in essential terms when we think in parallel with all possible sinusoids. The key difference is individuation. All concepts get individuated, i.e. concept spaces must get differentiated/indivtd for you to ghave a diffent concptn frm n ther, and the simple proof f ths is that sub ovbj are distinct indv uniquie things to you (found in your impredssins digferentiating of them as you run over contents ting of this asspect.)
553
554
555
556Where is consciousness "located"? It's not located anywhere. It's strictly a conceptual discipline. Imagine trying to convey in strictly biological, non-mind-present terms how we possess the means to quote Alma Deutscher and bring that evidence into the fold of Illuminism. Alma Deutscher has vivid imaginary characters like Schelle who smack of the inspiration of musicians and timeless archetypal figures and individuals of spiritual repute like Hypatia. Alma mentioned Tchaikovsky. Nowhere in the realm of percepts is there infinite expressional capability pivoting around zero and infinitude. Highly conceptual thought allows us to coordinate our lives to the utmost elevated highest degree, none of which is visible nor expressible via spacetime matter. In fact, matter would have to be arranged such as to heavily prioritize one thing or another; one "thought" or another very early on in biological evolution in a strictly biological universe, and the only forms of life wouldn't even be cellular life as that requires action.
557
558Concepts in themselves cannot think. Thought requires subject-object dichotomy. Listen to Tchaikovsky's Waltz of the Flowers. Existence requires choice, and concepts in themselves cannot do anything without an intermediate, and one that is multilaterally present and differentiated (minds). Individual minds select and that is why we need the wavefunction collapse. Existence would be intractible without the flurry of interaction between different, individual, uniquely executing uncaused causes. There would be nothing to "discuss". Existence cannot ever be reduced to flat universal determinism. That's what science gets so wrong. Existence must be comprised of 1) a complete system, tautology and mathematical language (ontological mathematics) and 2) varying potential in the array of executing minds which collapse their own unique wavefunctions. Existence cannot be anything other than this. We cannot have conceptual existence without minds, the wavefunction collapse, the PSR, and the spatiotemporal domain (it is itself only an offshoot of antisymmetry which produces dimensionality; it comes effectively present and built into monadic existence, not as strictly an exterior type of extension). In computing, all the logical executions of code that are produced regularly are simply part of the program that is evaluated all the time anyway. In other words, something which has presence has necessary existence preceding it, and it is in no part some kind of magical effect. Consciousness is the only thing close to magic and externality that Mind can ever produce. That's because consciousness is itself sophistication within contingent flowing terms via other monads.
559
560Consciousness is allowed to take place because we individuate as subject-objects through other subject-objects and by thinking inside a fully conceptual, mental analytical universe (we can thus reflect on the dynamic, conceptual properties expressed by conception itself). That is key to consciousness. There is no such thing as consciousness in a flat, material array of atoms or any such flat, strictly non-interactive system. Consciousness is strictly conceptual and can only come about because minds have access to infinite positive numbers, infinite negative numbers, infinite imaginary numbers and infinite negative imaginary numbers. It is possible only due to our connection with the frequency domain which includes connecting to other souls (looking up at a high window in the street to notice someone is there) and connecting to the Collective Unconscious which is accessible at any time.
561
562For minds to have access to everything at all times, we must be selecting. We don't arbitrate or choose based purely on our perceptual environment. Minds like Alma Deutscher's emphatically did not have the spatiotemporal inputs necessary to become a musician in such a short lifespan. Science is thus false, since it can't trace what she would have had to learn as other humans would have had to do. This in turn shows us that different humans have different paces, styles and rates of learning. This is strictly a conceptual function. There is no amount of classical music you'd have to listen to to suddenly be able to compose it expertly yourself. This is not a linear difference, but a conceptual difference - in the same way that some children are genius souls and some children learn to spout gibberish about paradise and 72 virgins and killing people in other countries. As ever, conception and conceptualization rules the mind, not locality of spacetime reference via percepts. The very idea someone could want to transform their life is emphatically not possible to arise via percepts. You cannot have a percept for a highly abstract, conceptual idea. The more conceptual you go, the broader and wider the conceptual definition/differentiation can range and gain. In terms of bandwidth, we would say that the PSR has the most bandwidth and is the richest signal possible.
563
564Where do concepts come from? Percepts help to reveal the inner concepts derivable ultimately from the PSR in various flavours and gradings. As we note, there are different grades and variations of consciousness. Imagine scenarios like running a country. The method itself is realized via a grand concept (like the dialectic, and the psychology of individuals), but what appears to those like children growing up and the sensory types, is not the concept which shapes the Phoster Society at all but percepts which help their conceptual minds to build up higher and greater concepts. Concepts have no visual existence; it's pure math which cannot be seen or perceived; it can however be conceived in your own style and competence. The better concepts come as the individual; the person; grows and individuates within a mortal, conscious life. The soul reaches higher and learns to integrate and compare and contrast better and broader and brighter concepts, purer of analytical sinusoidal symmetry in the most general, grandest sense. Brilliant classical music is highly symmetrical and confers a grand inside impression of mathematical significance. All the instruments are used, but they are not randomly rotated. Scientific autistic study of music couldn't appreciate that the mind-space and the emotion-space and intuition-space together are not a flat, arbitrary space at all but a conceptual space. That's why some interleaving-patterns of musical instrument, harmony and reverb have certain qualities and others other qualities. It has nothing to do with autistic, highly abstract, tedious thinking that the likes of neuroscientists with their brain scans are waiting around for.
565
566
567The thing about content and arranging the perfect content (imagine the perfect conversation) is that content emphatically is conception. Just as Form and Content must be resolved, and just as the concept of separation can't truly exist in the grand conception of ultimate reality, then so too does content and conception; percept and concept, become resolved. Angels have arrived towards the ultimate irreducible act: arranging and coordinating their mental lives so smoothly that even the things they are likely to encounter regularly, tip them off about the kinds of thoughts they should be having. Yet also, angels are exactly what which are independent of particular dependencies on circumstance! As ever, this can only be explained as a conceptual difference rather than a linear difference, and science is forever lagging behind with its dogmatic baggage of trying to introduce things with no particular framework as a basis. Science seeks to posit the recreation or appearance of phenomena from nothing ("creation ex nihilo").
568
569"Different Types of Creation
570
571" 1) Creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing).
572
573" 2) Creatio ex materia (creation out of matter; out of some pre-existent, eternal matter).
574
575" 3) Creatio ex deo (creation out of the being of God).
576
577" To create out of nothing is to bring existence from non-existence. This is absolutely impossible, hence 1) is fundamentally false and so is Abrahamism, which rests on it, and also scientific materialism, which is extremely close to Abrahamism in this regard.
578
579" To create using existing matter involves a mind-matter dualism of exactly the sort that later confronted Descartes: how do mind and matter interact if they are two wholly different substances?
580
581" The notion of creating out of the being of God implies pantheism: everything is God. The existence of evil is as incompatible with this position as it is with the “creation from nothing” position (whereby a perfect Creator creates everything and yet is supposedly not responsible for creating evil – although given that no one else created it, how can it be explained at all?).
582
583" In fact, everything is created from mathematical minds called monads, and these contain the energy that becomes matter when processed by the mathematical spacetime filter of an inverse Fourier transform.
584
585" Existence is eternal. Existence cannot come from non-existence and cannot become non-existence. Everything that exists has always existed, and all it ever does is undergo mathematical transformation. All that exists is energy contained within autonomous energy systems called monads. Thanks to Fourier mathematics, this energy can be expressed in dimensionless (frequency) form, in which case it is mental, and also in dimensional (spacetime) form, in which case it is material ...
586
587"The universe is not made out of nothing (creation ex nihilo). It’s made out of the pre-existing, eternal substance of existence, the divine substance of mathematics (creation ex deo).
588
589"Mathematics is nothing, and also everything. “Nothing” means perfect mathematical balance and symmetry. It means that the positive and negative are exactly matched."
590
591    Mike Hockney
592
593
594
595"Mathematics is the objective, neutral background and foundation for everything else – it’s ultimate noumenal reality (which is why science can’t escape from mathematics) – but it is not how we experience reality.
596
597" We don’t process mathematics directly (as mathematics), we experience it second-hand, as phenomenal, interpretational and subjective information. We convert mathematics into sensory sensations, languages, fictions, fantasies, emotions, pleasure and pain signals, and so on.
598
599" Just as the world of houses of all different shapes, sizes and styles is based on the humble brick, so is our diverse world based on mathematical “bricks”. And just as we don’t live directly inside individual bricks but in houses made from bricks (the secondary expression of bricks), so we don’t directly live inside mathematics itself (i.e., we don’t encounter the mathematical bricks in their noumenal form), but the things built from mathematics (i.e., mathematical phenomena)."
600
601    Mike Hockney
602
603
604
605Ontological mathematics (sinusoids and their interactions via monads) is the only thing acceptable as a background dependency. There is no such thing as a reality with no background dependency. There is no universe without depending on a background (a complete and consistent mathematical language). There is no such thing as a universe that derives its contingent content continuously out of sheer pure randomness or some flat determinism. Determinism is strictly conceptual and it must be provisioned by unit monads. There is no other type of causation. Monads continuously, eternally shape their own destinies and there is no other possible alternative (otherwise free will, thought, mind and life wouldn't be authentic, sincere, well formed or properly defined).
606
607Minds are forced to interoperate conceptually both between spacetime events and spacetime mathematical relations and interdependencies (motion; friction; character of will and agency in relation to spacetime; abstract goals that determine around spacetime goals and objectives and concepts) and also the relations and interdependencies of frequency in the frequency domain. When you think about the day's events as they happened in a sequence - that is a mathematical projection in the zero-dimensional eternal mathematics, in an absolute mathematical ontological reference-space. You are using eternal pristine monadic concepts (sinusoids; frequencies) but you are allowed to play with them as you wish. Outside of the shared material realm during sleep, your mind can freely blend abstract concepts and produce highly abstract, conceptual thoughts and experiences. You can feel incredibly pure calm and soothing and relaxation. You can conceive of your soul standing outside of your body. Unlocked and unchained, your mind can do these things. This wouldn't be possible if you didn't individuate dialectically via the world of percepts; the fallen benighted spacetime society.
608
609"We are now told that the arrow of time is merely psychological (unreal), and not an objective aspect of existence. If our psychology were different, we might see reality running backwards. In this worldview, it's our minds that impose motion - the illusion of motion - on the world, which is actually totally unchanging (as in Paramenides' conception of reality). However, since we must surely imagine our minds to be part of this static universe, frozen in a block forever, this makes it incomprehensible how these minds can psychologically generate the unreality of motion and change."
610
611    Mike Hockney
612
613The wavefunction collapse is objective, absolute and necessary. The contingent contents we produce have a relationship with how we think and select, so this is why in evolutionary terms minds adapt the idea in unconscious advance of framing things with linearity and linear connectivity. Some souls develop synesthesia where the months or days of the week can wrap around in circular fashion. Monads didn't develop extremely sudden changes, but the conceptual mathematical reformations were done on the basis of rational mathematical selection. This is conceptually different from saying that things organized according to need. Labelling something doesn't do it justice. There are billions of souls just in human bodies on Earth; they are all uniquely deriving their own highly conceptually diverse unconscious mathematical processes, so there is no thin scientific clause for "according to need" which can be slapped on and forgotten. Science is not a conceptual thinking discipline, so it has problems mentally conceptualizing how these details slither about and converge in multitude in array. What conceptualization allows angels and humans to do is to think powerfully in parallel as well as in series. We can use eternal infinite ranges of sinusoids to compose vastly different representations and estimations of all kinds of thoughts. We can pick and unfold thoughts about ranges of individuals and their specifics of generalities of organization of what they are attempting to do in their mind-space. These are all particulars made of universals (thoughts, composed of sinusoids; all thoughts are existents and they apply to the wavefunction collapse when we commit our changes to the shared dream).
614
615Conceptual existence is vastly more profound and capable than anything not resembling conceptual existence. Even our thoughts about a universe of percepts are actually conceptual! Scientists forgot that one. They left it out. It's vastly easier to think of a dumb system than it is to explain every aspect of a rival system using your own one. Scientists have given up, and prefer the easy thinking - or actually, we would be more correct to say, that people who can't think in highly sophisticated ways simply cannot do so, and this is no reflection on their emotional counterparts (it is only our projection; just as only angels could blame us for being, in their capacity of consciousness, lazy or fallen or ridiculously tedious and short-sighted).
616
617If you want to become an angel you must learn to project the angelic psyche onto yourself, which implies objective thinking. Objective thinking is incredibly powerful, because it's your own capacity to become self-aware and self-conscious (rather than suffering the narrow-band dialectic of the world of the lowest common denominator). Consciousness' ultimate convergence is powerful thinking independently reflected on itself. Think of a god and realize that no other monad has any capability to communicate with it at such a highly reflexive, responsive bandwidth. God souls can only become maximally self-conscious, rather than other-conscious. This is why you can never reach out infinitely to other people in some quasi-divine-society. The God Community Archetype is only an archetype; it cannot become realized here and now. Not yet. We do not have the conditions.
618
619
620
621For angels, the wavefunction has become an object for the mind to operate on. Ontological content (the angels' soul contents) has reached the dialectical impasse, the irreducible event horizon, between Form and Content. That's because, of course, the universe has only one prime substance (reason, or reasoning). There is no true duality of mind and matter (Descartes' problem); there is only dual aspect monism: the subject-object dichotomy, which is Leibnizian.
622
623
624
625"The human body is the best picture of the human soul." - Ludwig Wittgenstein
626
627The soul isn't anything like a body; it doesn't possess arbitrations to do with physical extension as its primary properties. The mind is conceptual and has conceptual free determination (mathematical free will, subject to mathematical competency i.e. the degree of consciousness). The conceptual flow of a mind is always changing and shifting, so it has nothing to do with a body in itself - that's precisely why mind is free to connect to new bodies and to new ideas as soon as this is permissible or preferable. Mind is totally free from matter in its eternal analytical constitution. Mind doesn't have mathematical bondage to the material domain in this sense. Mind always chooses and selects, using its vast array of sinusoids and conceptual methods, providing conceptual fluctuations as the mind searches and sweeps to adapt something. Even something as little as the tilting of the head; the cute mannerisms involved in dating, are purely a mind's solution of how it seeks to get what it wants analytically. Nobody anywhere is ever doing anything that's not conceptual, analytical and mental which produces concrete spatiotemporal commits to the wavefunction. We are all of the same ontological form: the unit monad. Our choices bestride all possible things we are conscious of -- humanity doesn't ever select from things which it conceptually doesn't conceptualize or thus know about. The highest thinkers and conceptualizers are gods, followed by angels. Nothing gets past them. Nothing has deluded or distracted them, and they aren't searching for another for internal Self completeness (The Higher Self). The Higher Self is exactly that which cannot intentionally come about through a specific second individual. It is the angelic function; it seeks the universals and to fly high.
628
629"Food for the body is not enough. There must be food for the soul." - Dorothy Day
630
631There must be food for the emotions; food for the rationality; food for the sexual and erotically desireful component of the soul. This follows Plato's tripartite theory of the soul. You also need to consciously know about Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Consciousness, just as any mental function of absolute mathematical reference, cannot get beyond a certain stage if there is a blockage.
632
633"it seems that, given each person has only one soul, it should be impossible for a person to simultaneously desire something yet also at that very moment be averse to the same thing, as when one is tempted to commit a crime but also averse to it. Both Socrates and Glaucon agree that it should not be possible for the soul to at the same time both be in one state and its opposite. From this it follows that there must be at least two aspects to soul." - Wikipedia
634
635Technically there are as many conceptual "dimensions" to the soul as there are sinusoids. We reach higher and higher contingent concepts, which are expressed through conscious (or unconscious) human culture, tradition, language, creative arts, interpersonal displays and acts, thought systems and philosophies. It's the masser contingent concepts that are of interest to anyone examining the human condition, but these are contingent and not eternal. You can only analytically know the soul via ontological mathematics and analytical confirmation. You can estimate and conceptualize about people (you can simulate them in your dreams) but this will never be a true representation; only a conceptual modelling.
636
637Concepts always generate percepts. It would be impossible for them not to. There is always implied, with conceptualization, a percept being selected. Concepts always select for something. They are all selector functions. The most abstract concepts like the PSR are hinting at something being promoted and other things not being promoted. There is always a goal in mind; always a reflective quality being demonstrated. The highest conceptual forms however, are not reliant on percepts so massively, which is a key distinction. We can only get there by highest reason, and there is a particular cost associated with this type of thinking (for angels). It's as if angels can see numbers attached to everything and every thought. In Death Note, archons can see the date above peoples' heads for when they will die. In reality, conceptual existence allows angels to think any powerful thought they want to. They don't need to draw up arbitrary distinctions (like a frequency view of the material visuals coming through our eyes) because they already have a conceptual powerhouse capable of superseding such concepts. That's the whole point of concepts! They aren't to be limited in view of circumstance. Concepts are meant to transcend circumstance by a higher formulation of eternal absolute mathematical forms (sinusoids). Forms are not contents; forms (sinusoids; numbers; frequencies) are always analytical, absolute, necessary, eternal.
638
639
640
641"It is my own firm belief that the strength of the soul grows in proportion as you subdue the flesh." - Mohandas (Mahatma) Gandhi
642
643Gandhi was talking about connecting with something other than the mundane world of the persona and Ego, but that doesn't mean life is one-dimensional. Poor conceptual thinkers conceptually have to rely on their empty half of the equation they're focusing on. When an athlete makes a mistake, it's because their unconscious mathematics isn't conceptually filled-out properly. A perfect athlete, like the footballers who deliver curved shots sweeping around into the goal behind the goalkeeper, has the unconscious execute the best-fit formula automatically. The unconscious doesn't have time to get anxious or nervous, and since the unconscious isn't sitting elevated and expanded into spacetime conscious slow processing, it doesn't get consulted as easily or as much enough to make mistakes. You definitionally can't make a mistake about something baked into your unconscious as correct and yet not consulted enough to make mistakes. When you eat breakfast and when you walk, you can't make mistakes unless the unexpected mathematical contingencies come up according to your concepts' conceptual detail. But mystical intuitives can make vast, broad-sweeping mistakes because they're operating absolute mathematics at a grand scale of reference with no idea what they're doing. Everything we construct in knowledge about society (what people know and what they don't know, and where these distinctions lie mathematically across a wavefunction) falls under the umbrella of consciousness, and nothing else. If you don't know something either unconsciously or consciously, then you don't know it. But people who are unconscious, don't know that they don't know. Mystical intuition is a type of unconscious activity framed as valuable by the individual's personhood within this social order, hence mystical intuitives are additively reliant and self-confirming of their intuitions.
644
645"Anger is one of the sinews of the soul." - Thomas Fuller
646
647Philosophy based on percepts and the human condition can't grasp at the ultimate nature of sinusoidal concepts, because we are not ever keeping within range of these narrow-band concepts; we only become conscious the more analytical and conceptual we get. Angels are hardly concerned about the last corner-cases of human interaction contingent to this world order; they are concerned with powerful thinking of the most generic, general, generalized order. They have a profound love for concepts. Angels seek the absolute and the universal.
648
649"A man sooner or later discovers that he is the master-gardener of his soul, the director of his life." - James Allen
650
651This is a reflection of consciousness and ontological mathematics. Note that the one is descriptive, the other is explanatory in a definitive, inarguable, life-changing way. One is a description which can inform in absolute generalized conceptual terms; the other is something that will stay with your soul forever because it provides potential to become conscious of concepts like consciousness. We are headed for maximizing our soul lines' future capabilities.
652
653"The most powerful weapon on earth is the human soul on fire." - Ferdinand Foch
654
655Beautiful as it is, this is only semantics. Syntax (consciousness and the unconscious revolutions of the psyche, personality and Self and Ego) are what you work on dialectically in order to better inform (coordinate) yourself with a sharper utility of your mind. When you have fleshed out the things you want to get by dialectical individuation from revealing in isolation what you didn't want to get and what was wrong (your failure attempts), you can integrate these insights into a new synthesized form, as contingent concepts in your mind. You can become conscious of everything that upset your pace and disserved you. You can individuate away all your flaws. You only get there by maximizing the experiences, accidents, interactions and rational provisions and improvisations. We synthesize semantics (hero stories; music; archetypes) with our intuition-space and our mind-space.
656
657"Every time a student walks past a really urgent, expressive piece of architecture that belongs to his college, it can help reassure him that he does have that mind, does have that soul." - Louis Kahn
658
659Ha! That would be if percepts ruled the world. More often than not however, people focus on the social and become unconscious of what's laid in front of them often enough. You call a place "home", "school", "university" and so on and then forget it. You may notice the christmas decorations, but again;- to imply that different cognitive types would constellate around a central percept, is utter delusion. (It has no sufficient existential promotion). This is the kind of thinking that places children with the "right toys" in the hope that percepts will magically shape the kid in the way you wanted. The soul is conceptual and often doesn't want what its parents want (and also failed to define syntactically). The soul can take inspiration from percepts, but we do it in habitual, refined ways according to our own agendas which includes maximization of breadth of consideration across many things. People want opportunities in life, not to be reminded of some particular thing someone wanted but failed to orchestrate into actualization. If you want to influence people, you have to think in objective terms and get outside your own head. That's the realm of consciousness, analysis, psychoanalysis and psychology. If you want to craft the perfect message for someone, you have to think in terms outside your own frames of reference, and mentally conceptualize their mind and how it works and what it wants. If you want to influence public life and politics, you have to tap into how people think (ENTP thinking) and provide tantalizing bait. Everything can be calculated, but some things have intuitive costs more prohibitive than others (as the angels can intuitively see as they look over everything they consider doing).
660
661Thought and consideration can only be conceptual. There is no other way. There is nothing other than concept which can manufacture, carry and deliver like concept can. Percepts are part of the spatiotemporal environment i.e. they're locked into specific use-cases, contexts and clauses privy to some other abstract will, like a government's will or a corporation's will. Percepts will never ascend like concepts can, out of predicament and precedent and scenario. The condition of the percept comes with whatever you subjectively flaunt and fluctuate and float with your sinusoids. If you are good at grabbing these insights out of reality via intuition and thinking, you can conceive freely and also accurately. If your mind doesn't have the developed conceptual tooling, you won't grasp what's happening and your conceptions of what's going on around you will be grabbed at the lower level, fully provided of course by your own mind and nobody else. Criminals can't blame other people for their failures. They had a failed conceptualization. We can also say however that the fault can never lie squarely with one action; one event; one party. This is the gift of consciousness: we can reframe things in higher and higher qualities of thought; more and more considered, inflexional thinking. The task of consciousness however, as you may have seen here, is not to finally resolve the unresolvables and incommensurables between different points of view! Nobody is supposed to have the argument that ends in mutual agreement, ever, because that is a false ideal which is poorly formed. We are supposed to each individuate and become god. That is all we can essentially do. That is how we resolve everything and all the differences between wills. In the intermediate sense to this, we will establish a Phoster Planet society via a New World Order of logic and reason, and that's enough; that's all humans could be expected to do at their utmost highest wills for now. Through the cooperation of sufficiently rational wills, this will be aided. The angels are working their hardest in the background; not overexerting themselves of course since they don't need emotion or sleep; to facilitate the ideal conditions for this on Earth, and on other God Game Planets.
662
663
664
665How do you open a packet of food? You use absolute analytical mathematics to locate a way to open it - and then you move your hands to do it. At no point does anything especially external to ontological mathematics happen. At no point does anything extra-special take place other than the ontological form of mind selecting contingent thoughts and putting them into practice. You are always selecting in the absolute mathematical sense. Thinking about percepts as if percepts are definitionally apart from concepts is what confuses you. You can't think about percepts; they can't tell you anything about your mood, or why you do things or what is the best configuration of your life for you, or what the universe is. You have to think primarily in concepts.
666
667Can you hold percepts in mind? How much? You can hold them in mind as much as you want or are able to - which is to say, you formulate your own conceptions freely and you see how you can utilize them (this is all actual math that you do unconsciously). You can hold aspects of percepts in mind. But you can't hold a percept in mind, unless we are talking about some formulation like a highly detailed visual in hypnopompia or hypnagogia. Some things we can see in our mind's eye like they are actually photos of people; this comes from the mind via concepts, you are generating percepts (arrayed conceptual selective outputs) but the overall form of this is given by the mind and what it is trying to achieve (which is a flowing type of conceptualization, and has an ontological, absolute necessary form: the unit monad).
668
669We can identify absolutes analytically via 1) concepts and 2) reflecting on reality's conceptional process itself. Science is a (1) pattern which tries to conceptually puzzle over only percepts and brief concepts concerning percepts. Illuminism is a (1) and (2) pattern. Mystical intuition is a (1) pattern; atheism and abrahamism are a (1) pattern. Only rational analytical consciousness in a universe of conceptual existence can ever facilitate a (1) and (2) pattern.
670
671Karl Popper arguing with Einstein against determinism: "The main topic of our conversation was indeterminism. I tried to persuade him [Einstein] to give up his determinism, which amounted to the view that the world was a four-dimensional Parmenidean block universe in which change was a human illusion, or very nearly so. (He agreed that this had been his view, and while discussing it I called him 'Parmenides'.) I argued that if men, or other organisms, could experience change and genuine succession in time, then this was real. It could not be explained away by a theory of the successive rising into our consciousness of time slices which in some sense coexist; for this kind of 'rising into consciousness' would have precisely the same character as that succession of changes which the theory tries to explain away. I also brought in the somewhat obvious biological arguments: that the evolution of life, and the way organisms behave, especially higher animals, cannot really be understood on the basis of any theory which interprets time as if it were something like another (anisotropic) space coordinate. After all, we do not experience space coordinates. And this is because they are simply nonexistent: we must beware of hypostatizing them; they are constructions which are almost wholly arbitrary. Why should we then experience the time coordinate -- to be sure, the one appropriate to our inertial system -- not only as real but also as absolute, that is, as unalterable and independent of anything we can do (except changing our state of motion)? The reality of time and change seemed to me the crux of realism. (I still so regard it, and it has been so regarded by some idealistic opponents of realism, such as Schrödinger and Gödel.)"
672
673You get around having to perceive anything via the inside vs. outside properties of ontological mathematics. You conceive, and you are not pressed any further to be able to interact with percepts. It comes inbuilt with ontological mathematical existence. It's the most natural process ever, as the soul has already evolved the concepts suitable to connect to a body before it's here. Adding more sophistications as Einstein did to try to do away with reality being real and absolute and derived from Plato's Forms from an absolute mental domain (sinusoids are those ontological forms, and the PSR is the ultimate ontological form) really didn't help. You cannot invent something like block time or slices of time, and then try to attach consciousness and mind onto these ad-hoc from the dogmatic viewpoint of existence with no background dependency. The background dependency for existence must exist for all contingent things (contingent thoughts, contingent concepts, archetypes and percepts and culture), and this must be a complete and consistent mathematical language.
674
675Consciousness isn't something aided by time, or any mechanism intrinsic to reality and causation. That would be an insufficient justification for such a mechanism. The only special pleading we can ever have is our own conceptualization; this can be the only thing that distinguishes, discerns and differentiates one monad from another. Monads individuate to become differentiated from one another, using their conceptual processes with a dialectic and under dialectical fashion, and this takes place of eternal form and has contingent, continuous flow within spacetime mathematical domain of expression. This is all permitted to happen "at the same time", as it is happening eternally and only via conceptual shifts and changes of mathematics! Do you see it yet? That is the beauty of it. Everything is provided and when we all become conscious of this type of thought, the god community will be manifested and we will provision the things we all want in excess, just like successful cooperative teams in all domains of life.
676
677Mind and life only happens conceptually; it can only happen of conceptual, absolute sinusoidal composition. We don't need to be conscious of space coordinates or time coordinates, and neither do we need to be sentient in view of them; but we do need to have an absolute mental frame of reference in both space and time coordination to be able to consistently reliably reframe and formulate eternal, absolute-frame-of-reference ontological mathematics with our sinusoids. We need to be ontologically "placed" within a Singularity of singularities (minds) to be able to achieve the interconnection necessary. Mind doesn't work going by abstract mathematical natures; Mind is part of the mathematical underlying/overlarching framework of existence. The PSR necessitates all of this in view of what we would perceptually be able to reconstruct if we were any Mind in any valid type of reality and located anywhere over the cosmos: we would be able to reconstruct, given such percepts and concepts of a Higher Life planet, that we were in a type of universe operating by the PSR. That's what the PSR guarantees. This is the reflective property of reasoning. The mind is engaged in a living exploration of living, active, dynamic, breathing reasoning. The universe is emphatically alive, and that's what science just can't wrap its head around. It takes the act of analytical conception to realize that we are living minds which are thinking at the same time. Even Deepak Chopra said that the universe is what exists at the same time while we are thinking!
678
679Conceptual mind and conceptual existence means that every act is a mental act; we are not our bodies per se; we are minds in the outfits and clothing of fleshy bodies. Fleshy bodies have dimensionality and physical properties, which are arrayed percepts. Someday you will be able to customize your own body, thanks to an escape velocity tolerated by the angels by virtue of it being already reached genuinely and authentically by human minds; we will then have the capacity to use the current intuition in each individual to let them have some freedom here. For now, it takes enormous effort to think in highly conceptual, abstract, unassuming terms. In the future we will try to shift percepts and social organization so that quality thinking itself gets easier for everyone. It won't get anywhere near thoroughly easy, but we will be able to posit things in a constructive, accessible, intuitive way.
680
681
682
683If you constantly blur/defocus your eyes, you're still in reality. If you're blind, you're still in reality. None of it analytically changes. Yet according to some theories from science, any derivation in the sense organs thieving you of perceptual abilities could jeopardize the way reality unfolded! Now that's just nonsense. Reality never unfolds differently depending on whether we can consciously conceive of spacetime coordinates or not. Unconscious hand-to-eye coordination happens because the mind has conceptually evolved the capabilities to compose "arbitrary" absolute math thoughts which aren't now so arbitrarily dependable because they have grown into a soul's bodily tooling. A soul has a bodily tooling, an emotional tooling, a social tooling and a rational tooling, a sexual tooling, an imaginative tooling, an intuitive tooling, a mystical tooling, and so on. These, as ever, are never distinct categories because our very contingent act of creating them suspiciously smacks of the one thing that is contingent and binding of them: conceptual selection! Categories can never exist in and of themselves; the absolute is the absolute and doesn't contain distinctions within it. This is the strictest way to think about analytical ontology. Of course we use words to differentiate things and to impose our own language of categories and categorical distinctions (which are converted to unconscious mathematical conceptualizations in your mind). That is the use and the gain of human language.
684
685Mathematical language is absolute; human language reveals our level of conscious wielding of that absolute mathematical language. Human language is for conceptual communication and self-reflection and analytical reflection; mathematical language is the formal absolute eternal basis and the ingredient for generating thoughts. Ontological mathematics is primary and concerns ontological form, while contingent introductions are secondary and concern contingent forms made via combinations of individual mathematical basis concepts (sinusoids). The ways we can think about these noumena and phenomena vary infinitely. This allows us to think clearer.
686
687
688
689How do people say different things? What you inject into the wavefunction of other peoples' lives is about what you have grasped will be the effect, power and utility of that function; that pattern of percepts; or that pattern of concepts (as in the case of logos communication) which ultimately reduce to percepts (only angels and gods can communicate consciously conceptually, telepathically, via zero perception). If a soul says something that moves a little weight of society (trolls; the people making jokes out of everything), these souls are doing what they think is maximal leverage of their power. They haven't clocked that it will be quickly forgotten and that much more inflexional influence (reasoning) is possible. For this to happen for a soul, it would have to be a conceptual difference where that soul was already working and displaying the tendencies of mind and conception associable with conceptual, conscious thought of that level. All it takes is one piece of information for an angel to categorize you with deadly-precise accuracy. All you need to know about some people is 3 pieces of information to get a rough general idea of them. (Of course such statements make no sense to scientists, who can't grasp the implicit message here that we're talking about highly intuitive thoughts and "intuitive" pieces of information, not random arbitrary data).
690
691"Face: I was trying to save her.
692
693"Hannibal: Save her?
694
695"Face: Yeah.
696
697"Hannibal: SAVE HER?
698
699"Face: Yeah!
700
701"Hannibal: How? Please do share with us your plan, Face!
702
703"Face: ...okay, I hadn't thought about that yet.
704
705"Hannibal: Exactly! I had to!
706
707    The A-Team (2010)
708
709It cannot be overstated that all of this is mathematics becoming god. Every aspect of Earthly existence seems rudimentary and simplistic and obvious to angels. They look forward and they see beyond. A god sees beyond the temporal and contingent, and intuitively glimpses much further. A god sees the patterns that predominate and encircle our contingent environment, paving the way for the next dialectical thought: the resolution; the antithesis and synthesis. To glimpse and to keep on that correct line as Agathon said;-
710
711"Look not round at the depraved morals of others, but run straight along the line without deviating from it." [source: Marcus Aurelius' Meditations]
712
713We are all in the divine, eternal community where souls like Plato, Napoleon, Marcus Aurelius, and Pythagoras reincarnate. We are all part of this divine body. The individual cells of collective god must work together as one functioning body.
714
715Persons suffering mortal complexes and neuroses, and suffering their Shadow, talk of things they want or deserve that aren't ever given to them. We can make a point here of a more eternal archetype, in saying that as you were born, you never had such attachments or wants. What you have mathematically resurged with this time is another formulation on the god within; The Higher Self. You will not make yourself complete by desiring anything in particular. You have to roll on with it and become divine and gracefully accept certain parameters no matter how uncomfortable that is. For all our initial projections, we can only become conscious and we cannot say whether things should be one way or another, unless we have particularly sharp intuitive private knowledge. The angel archetype will show you some of that if you can use thinking and intuiting powerfully enough with it. What the highest archetypes allow us to do, ultimately, is to reframe anticipation, environment, and circumstance in different ways using the rational sharply analytical powers of the mind. We can escape the normal usual limitations of the mind via higher conceptual thinking, guided in part by an archetype. Archetypes are contingent concepts which uniquely are detached from modern culture completely. Carl Jung talked about the figure of the modern times versus the figure of eternity. One is based on the left brained notion of how we fit into spatiotemporal events, culture and social compliance; one is about the cohesive whole and the satisfaction of eternal goals and aims for the collective. These are diametrically opposed qualities, and we have a dialectical brain structure. In other words, the irreducibility of conceptual expression is brought right into spacetime itself, and follows us around all the time in our brain structure and our synaptic activity.
716
717If people were forced to look at human anatomy all day, they would have a much less shallow approach to life. This however would infringe upon the emotional and sensory comfort principles of most people, and the Old World Order would never allow that to run their reign into the ground. Concepts are always ruling the world. Angels supply the Old World Order and the Illuminati with concepts, to legislate and order the world so that it doesn't fall into chaos and ruin. The angels are the ultimate rational guardians of order, actualized potential and consistency. Angels are the referees of the world. Any soul at such a development of rationality becomes so, as a conceptual difference and virtue of being in that way conceptually. The more hyperrational and superconscious you are, the less you are able to be selfish, petty, irrational (since these are all minimizing functions surrounding souls and their interoperability). Romantic relationships are an example of differential soul mathematics on these terms of maximizing outcomes "on accidental circumstantial terms". The ultimate relationship is with yourself because it is the most strongly rationally and analytically defined. Not even angels can get away from this. If you were about maximizing outcomes, you may first think you'd want the perfect relationship with everyone capable, but you don't have the time or space to make this happen. Gods have reached the synthesis stage to the extreme here, requiring no input at all existentially from other monads to exist and act independently.
718
719
720
721"We all know the Navy is never wrong, but in this case it was a little weak on being right." - Wendell Mayes
722
723This is the level of statement that science makes about reality, via empiricism. Horrificially, it's an attempt at framing reality as if reality had no background dependency. It's just a bare statement that the clueless cannot argue with. It presumes no wider context. Of course the Navy can always be wrong if something conceptually surrounding it can be brought to show that it's misguided. Of course, if you can't conceive of something bordering and wrapping around what you do for a job, or reality itself, then you're lost, completely. The good news is that hyper rational souls exist along with everyone who is lost and can't conceive of a reality with background dependency. We are the cure for souls' demise. We are the powers proven to end the madness.
724
725What is lost on science is that there is always a wider context for everything we say; for every statement. The only exception to this is the PSR. Ontological mathematics doesn't follow such patterns of logic and logical dependency, and the complete set of sinusoids doesn't have contingency so it's free from any rules about contingent constructs. What we construct contingently has rules and principles which apply to it (principally we are talking about how to become conscious via higher conceptual thinking) and this is important since science neglects this key observation, given that ontological mathematical sinusoids comprise the only eternal absolute frame of reference where the wider context rule no longer applies. Scientists are wholly ignorant of what higher conceptual thinking is, and that's why they are able to brush it aside. It's a conceptual difference, not an additive difference. No amount of published papers or theories as a scientist can make your thinking a more robust instrument. If you live by the percepts, you die by the percepts having glimpsed nothing of grand significance. Percepts have no particular special significance in and of themselves. They can't tell you anything about higher conceptual thinking or higher conceptual reality (we think to analytically find reality; reality to us is a thought).
726
727There exist only minds and thoughts, and the mechanics and concepts such as wavefunction collapse to facilitate this. That isn't scary once you wrap your head around it properly. It's a shift in conceptualization. Knowledge is freedom, and when you were an animal; whever you sensed as you ate as a human; whenever you were cozy in a room as a child, you weren't any better off without it. Ignorance is only bliss as far as ignorance can conceptualize!
728
729Depressed geniuses like Einstein and Tesla and Nietzsche were only depressed because the current world circumstances didn't pay them due respects, or another way to express something commensurate is that they weren’t able to self actualize with others in a healthily rational environment. In the future this will change. Conceptual consistency however operates in an eternal analytical framework and won't crumble. Through Soul Work, we achieve immortality of a certain kind.
730
731
732
733
734Petty is as petty does.
735
736
737Conceptual mind has the ability to reflect on all kinds of loose-knit concepts (such as making it over the line; making the transition to something greater and making the grade when the time is up). That's what matters. Percepts and non-mind could never facilitate this. Nothing that is not mind can ever think. Thinking implies individual causation in a multilateral causation environment of infinite minds. Why? Nothing else is ever properly defined ontologically, and would never raise or amount to anything. If we have mind, then we must have mind in multitude which has a dialectical goal. There is no such thing as a construct of reality without background depencency. The PSR is the conceptual cutoff point for any conceptual dependency. If we didn't have differentiated clouts of concepts, there would be no point in existence and nothing could be differentiated. The key thing is that the PSR is an eternal, necessary, analytical concept and that's why it's so different to the contingent concepts (thoughts) constructed via minds.
738
739What minds are doing is creating shifting fluctuations in analytical mathematics, in the eternal scenario of mind at large (the Singularity). This provisions the mode and the ontological form within which all the things that can ever be expressed must sit. Every contingent provision is infact actually only an eternal existent (a monad) coming up with an eternal thought existent (a sinusoidal composition). It's just that we experience and perceive by the vector of spacetime, which is why things appear to us in percepts as if they are happening in a stream. Since all monads do this in concert, we ourselves collectively provide the "illusion" of the passage of time! Isn't that amazing? Isn't that wondrous? It's only by happenstance (i.e. non-divinity) that we ever conceive of linear spacetime events. All of this evaporates out of dissymmetry via The Omega Point, because it was never anything "extra" or "whole" to begin with. Nothing ever existed outwith existence in its own right, outside of number, sinusoid, and wavefunction collapse thereof. We are a community of minds but no single sentence, claim, thought or statement has sufficiently rational promotion over any other. Thus, we are locked in a continual eternal refinement of such competing thoughts, until we reach the ultimate intractible resolution (The Omega Point; collective gnosis). That will be the end of the discussion of sinusoidal contents until the only thing to do is to chase it up again up from nothing. Every last monad will be brought up by the most powerful monads.
740
741Space and time, it cannot be emphasized enough, are mathematical concepts. They are how we interact with the wavefunction using Fourier transforms and inverse Fourier transforms. Eternity doesn't have any requirements of space and time, since math doesn't! We don't live in space and time; rather, space and time are mathematical translations by which we explore and invent different noumena and phenomena. The universe is entirely analytical all while it's consumed with phenomena, just as a child in a bedroom is at all times a civilian, a member of society, a citizen without stateless status that the government has a responsibility towards, and countless other things.
742
743How do concepts converge? Via other concepts. Percepts are expressions selected by conceptual actualizations (which are given by monads). Only a mind can use concepts. When we mix concepts with interactions with other souls and the objective percept environment, we see the results and we change tact and course to suit what we want to select next. As wills in the world compete, we are brought closer and clearer to what certain concepts visit upon the world and what we would dialectically instead rather would happen.
744
745Concepts can converge via competing wills and special interest groups (like nation state political lobbies involved in other countries' politics, and think tanks and stakeholders) or they can converge in the mind of individual monads which are introverted. Extroverts have less potential for thinking if they are primarily interfaced with the world of externals where they are waiting for others to make things happen. Introverts make things happen for themselves, which is a fundamentally different task. The mind is starting to explore concepts via introverted thinking. Introversion however is no substitution for conceptual rational neocortex thinking.
746
747Angels can summon different types of thinking at will, as if they were persona masks the angel had gotten used to. One type is deep introspective thinking. Angels have an effort to know themselves inside-out. They must become conscious of exactly how they think, which is the same as becoming conscious more and more of the sinusoids' interoperabilities and how it's possible to gain complete ultimate knowledge. Dual aspect monism necessitates this. A god couldn't become god without fully exploring its own thought. The Self is infact nothing too far extended and separate from the objective utilization of thought and its leverage over the objective wavefunction collapse. The universe recognizes no key essential difference; the only difference that is given is contingent thoughts and the conceptual methods we use to select thoughts. That is the only permitted differentiation. Conceptual reality must be irreducible in terms of how it treats contingent concepts, because certain contingent concepts cannot be promoted above others so as to make them intractible or accessible only in certain key conditions (which would then have no sufficient justification as to how to get to them, or why they were excluded from availability). Ontological mathematics is the only possible complete and consistent language, hence it suffers from none of these problems and cannot possible generate them (especially as it's an eternal system, and cannot thus make any mistakes, definitionally; by definition).
748
749
750
751All of human narrative, and all of the history of development of human concepts is contingent. Everything in "Earth language" is nothing like the language that could be used on a planet full of angels. We simply use words that are made to serve the conditions of life evolving from primates, and we have not moved significantly far beyond this in the divine frame of reference. The words we use for the Self and the individual are not completely accurate. To be more accurate, you would have to have everyone's minds upgraded and to think in much more refined conceptual terms. That's exactly what angels do. Angels don't get bogged down in the same use of language as we do, when we talk about people being selfish or being concerned with their own private pleasure. This is a conceptual difference brough about multilaterally on planets full of angels; it conceptually comes with the territory. The conception precedes the percepts which are the circumstances. If the circumstances have changed, then the contingent requirements have dropped off and dropped out of the mathematical conceptual completion which applies on Earth planets. Angels can adapt their thinking for any planet; any state of Higher Life's evolution. Angels are essentially dedicated thinkers to the utmost degree humanly imaginable.
752
753
754
755Culture can be infectious, but spirit is what resists this and burns through, prizing its hard-wrought gems. Creatively, you have your apertures of competency which can keep you feeling an achiever. When people speak properly and introduce you to the best of life (like a music teacher in the modern anxious Last Man setting), we are moved towards the higher elements of society and culture. Here there is warmth, and rationality. When you have the appearance of a young girl genius musician in the modern world you also live in right now (and she has synesthesia), there is no mistaking the psychodramatic hit: you are being upstaged; you are being shown how to live properly. Life in this sense of indomitable spirit, is about holding out and appropriating the right elements of higher life and high culture for yourself. It's about collecting the right ways to live, which can save your soul. All highly intuitive souls are a breath of fresh air and a break from the dissonance, the fall, the disunification of god. We don't need to unite in a mystical undefinable social way; we need to rationally find and restyle our lives in the best way possible, and we will give this to everyone via consciousness.
756
757
758
759When you click on a logical choice statement using a computer ("read this book online"), you are selecting a conceptual choice, not a technically-ascertained, filled, syntactical choice. One is purer of concept, the other is detailed of unconscious understanding i.e. you had to run over the possibilities to get to this knowledge; where the purer conceptual choice is theoretically something you can cross without knowing any of the underlying details. Back in the 90s and 80s, it would have been something very new as people were introduced to computers in the workplace; and where computer programs were being designed after the age of the typewriter and paper records (which continued into the 70s, and you can see the computer interface tropes expressed on old TV shows like Columbo). People used to try to conceptually interact with the computer (as if you could ask it to print your work) but then a technical layer of sophistication and syntactical miscommunication would present itself, and you'd need a computer administrator to fix the company computers or help you with getting aligned to the process.
760
761Conceptual user interfaces never really took off. Inhuman corporations have been pushing the spines of monkey coders ever since to fill the gaps, but since computer programmers have no imagination or highly conceptual generalist thinking, they are completely unable to present the "slow thinking" or highly abstract, broad-base, long-range solutions to their bosses. The bosses in turn, in true master-slave fashion, simply whip the workers harder and stories like EA Spouse and horror stories about mid-life crises emerged as the modern game industry simply churns through burned-out individual worker drones to produce wide-volume saleable content. Coders are not highly intuitive, and this is shown in the industry fads they get caught up in defencelessly.
762
763There never was a human element to human-computer interface. It never got off the ground, and today there are endless tedious computer support technician processes and scripts that simply blindly get you to update your computer (get it to a safe conceptual starting point, as if a paranoid child) rather than rationally resolve what the problem must be. The Windows Operating System, within the Microsoft offices in Redmond, is notorious for its incredibly muddled codebase with landmine old code statements. Extroverts and empiricists curtail around problems (they try to hire or headhunt people who will fix problems for them); introverted intuitive thinkers investigate and we are the pioneers in that. We are the responsives; the all-through-genuine. We can show our work. We can explain, elaborate and testify in rational, absolute, analytical, a priori terms.
764
765
766
767Something as idealistic as open source video game expression is a highly refined concept; it's a communist concept for gods. Concepts can be dialectically worked within your own monad within a very short span of time, using archetypes that elevate and inspire and project these noumena onto the whole of society. You have to be autistic or sheltered to do this aggressively with fervor.
768
769So, concepts can be dialectically reached via yourself or more direct interdependent revision with the world or a close-knit group -- but concepts aren't necessarily appropriate for the world we live in. (The autistic mindset can choose to completely float over this. It can drop out of certain unfamiliar, uncomfortable contingent conceptual requirements and focuses and variables and conditions). Concepts are fitted for our selection agendas. If the world is not your primary consideration (if you are your primary consideration; if your will is being reflected through archetypes and ideals and what you have projected everyone should be highly intuitive enough to appreciate), your conceptual apparatus and outputs will be duly reflected. Hackers are highly intuitive monads who have struggled to realize that most people simply have no kind of awareness of certain strands of high intuition like they do. Nobody is watching hackers make Facebook or Twitter posts. Hackers imagine that everyone watches and everyone's interested and everyone's in on the in-context.
770
771Concepts have a utility that can either be commensurate with society at large, or not. There are also in-between cases, as we might expect (the conceptual application would come with extra conditions, exactly as in military power in the ancient world's historical figures, or in modern politics and negotiations like Brexit). Some concepts are entirely overbearing or they have misplaced use-cases; they are designed for problems which don't exist. (We are of course talking about contigent concepts here). Concepts are the noumenal forms of life! They actually breathe life into what we do. Ideas and inspirations are all conceptual. Sex, intimacy, creative generation, mystery, wonder, fascination, story, are all contingent concepts. Dreams run on concepts, not percepts. Dreams generate percepts, via conceptual mixing. It's in our dreams that the unconscious has been fully unlocked and freed from the mundane blueprints and outcrops of mental life. Can you unlock your unconscious mind while awake? Have you had vivid mental imagery in public? Do you "own" your mind? Can you hack your mind? Monads can do anything if there is nothing to prevent it and if we see and mechanize enough intrinsic motivation towards it. We leverage conceptual eternal absolute pristine mathematics, via sinusoids. This presents all the capabilities for vivid mental imagery that you have seen reported in peoples' stories. People never usually write about the most conscious use of mind, though.
772
773Minds use various indexes to help them locate (coordinate) connections to people. The things we prefer (likes and dislikes) is one such index of seeing who would align with you in terms of interests, life goals, and general soul symmetry. The highest quality indexes are the highest contingent concepts and who meets them. The universe is literally arranged so that we will all converge on hyper rational thinking -- never some obscure pallette of music artists, humour preferences and stories.
774
775Coordination comes with concepts and mind and selection and the wavefunction collapse. When you coordinate things well, things go well. Do you remember the qualia of a perfect summer experience from when you were much younger? The adults, to you, would have perfectly coordinated everything. The right people turned up, the right tasty food and music was there, and you had a great time and it was thrilling. This is a manifestation, a realization and actualization, of the concept of coordination. The right things are brought together. It's a concept, so it is mutable (changeable) with other concepts and nothing is eternally, rigidly, set in stone to some fixed pattern. That's what you get with concepts. Contingent concepts are always open-ended, stretchable and adaptable. They can be advanced, enriched, or allied with other concepts. Concepts can be filled with more conceptual detail. You can't ever do this with percepts. There has to be a conceptual apparatus in order to manipulate and traverse concepts. Through conceptualization and conceptual selection, we get the transcendent function (it only comes about via consciousness and becoming able to reflectively investigate and analyze the mind operating on itself to a particular fashion).
776
777
778
779How is life on other God Game Planets? Their life is definitionally similar to ours. Their concepts such as creativity and dreams and technology and government exist in pretty much the same ways. The conceptual detailing of these concepts would be different among different planets, with differing world souls and different conscious tracings and branchings of particular conceptual detail, due to the individual discoveries and the disparities therein (culture, rationality, intelligence, insight, historic delivery) with our own on Earth.
780
781The Collective Unconscious allows us to connect to our planet's world soul, and also the entire universe. Lucifer and Satan are directly accessible all the time in their archetypal influence. The universals like The Mother Archetype are not simply dialectically found on one God Game Planet. That would be far too slow a development. Instead, souls develop these across planets. If we were locked into a spatiotemporal interactivity for how to develop unconscious mind, then there would have to be a sufficient reason why this is so and not otherwise. There is obviously no such provision for this (no-one is keeping count of this over all the other similar trillions of particular contingent concepts), and so it is that the only binding forms for all monads are the eternal, a priori and necessary ones. Monads are free to choose and express themselves. Monads are free to select, even from the Collective Unconscious.
782
783It's consciousness that develops on planets, precisely because (for us at this stage of our God Game Planet) the spatiotemporal interface is how we bring about consciousness and escape the dreamlike unconscious state. When you're just travelling somewhere, you're not conscious; your mind drifts. When you're doing repetitive manual labour without thought, you're not particularly conscious. But the broad band of objective public life, via the left brain, ensures that we are forced to become conscious. The spatiotemporal domain links us in zero-dimensional mathematical terms to events that would otherwise be inaccessible via pure intuition. Mystical intuitives are trying in this sense to go backwards. The planet and the political psychodrama exists so that we push forward! The move to thinking life is the move to higher consciousness. You can't think without both concepts and percepts (form and content). Humans are in absolute dire need of planets so their souls can individuate. We reincarnate exactly back to the planets with interesting life on, which the angels are the caretakers and groundskeepers of to make sure that no soul lands on a chaotic, unliveable monster planet. Angels themselves have a very easy job in this capacity.
784
785Consciousness arises more the more that we interact with and engage higher syntheses of form and content. The planet and the planetary psychodrama offers a high level of conscious development (compared to animalistic non-consciousness). Being a competent reader of nonfiction is the level where you are highly conscious and also balanced and stable enough in this life to be able to do so. You must be well-adjusted or capable of making that happen for yourself even if you're isolated, i.e. well-adjusted to yourself and completely comfortable in who you are, and getting the most from all of life. You need to feel thoroughly alive, and you need to be engaged in something that really truly rewards you and sublimates your Will to Power by providing the highest expression you are capable of (the only one that will settle the devil inside).
786
787The left brain spatiotemporal environment allows us to be linked in new ways (the world of percepts) that we would otherwise do. Imagine if everyone forgot about the spacetime domain when they slept, and that this went on for a whole year at a time, everyone drifting off to sleep, and only you and a few people were left awake in the world. Now we can reintroduce it to our hypothetical scenario - and hey presto, the lights come on and our visuals are drawn up, and a new conceptual dimensionality is provided to life. What we gain from the left brained spatiotemporal domain is our willingness and capability to be linked to such constructs (which are wholly conceptual) and to be drawn into these devices; these methods and functions of minds' operation. This is a highly abstract, unassuming thought.
788
789The key about dialectical evolution is it requires us to encounter percepts; prompts; dialectical results and reflections. Reflection is mathematical and runs on absolute tautology; this is how conscious developed from non-consciousness, or that is to say, unconsciousness of a different, lower kind. The key is in trying to reduce all these individual satellite words we try to use to cover up what reality really is (all pure math with no ultimate extensions, no ultimate special pleadings and no ultimate promotions to undeserved suspicious platforms).
790
791
792
793Let's say for a moment that you encased your fingertips in glitter and they appeared a different colour than the rest of your fingers. You can picture this in your mind's eye clearly. You can only do this because of concepts, and not via percepts. Percepts cannot help you think new thoughts irrespective of the environment. Percepts cannot last and give a prolonged weighting of influence (what we have is conceptual knack; conceptual momentum and weight and clout and utility). The proof of this is that we can add literally any other concept on top as a qualifier in a sentence. Your fingertips could be longer. Your fingertips could have protrusions like stalks or leaves. Your fingertips could lift things by virtue of being made of something stronger. Note that percepts in themselves cannot ever contain anything that has background dependency, hence there is nothing to fall back on. Conceptual existence necessitates and implies that minds always have something in the background they can draw from (via conceptual selection over absolute sinusoids, and the conceptual ascension of the monad's Selector Function) to make the corresponding conceptual difference. Each mind has its own pincushion of imaginative depths and extents and favourite exercises of these abilities; each mind will create its own unique mental imagery and mental percepts (such as visuals, and "preferences" for the way the hand is oriented in the mind's eye) in the particular conceptual ranges that it has favourited and aligned itself with, out of all absolute mathematical variety and variance to choose from. This is necessary and mandated by the PSR: minds must choose something absolute and particular, and submit this to the wavefunction regularly. There is no strict highschool rulebook for these things -- it comes inbuilt to reality -- our very description of this is plucked out of our own highly nuanced, refined, deliberated conceptual selection (we deliberately tied certain things together and missed out others); hence the combined thought drawing from the sinusoids, as you would expect, freely dovetails across particular instantiations of thought (all thoughts are existents) to arrive at higher symmetry. (This is akin to points trailing along negative and imaginary number quadrants). If we deconstruct and pick this apart further, we will of course find that the nature and purpose of thought is to provide symmetry in as fast and as efficient terms as possible. Angels craft the most shining, brilliantly pure and precise thoughts catered to angel minds. Gods furnish the very highest, most capable thoughts. Humans are stuck with trying to differentiate their feelings from their thoughts! They typically have no idea what will help arrange and coordinate their life the most streamlined.
794
795
796
797Angels are the "old guard", watching and waiting for something incredibly brilliant to outpour from humanity. The angels are the real-life versions of the archetypal Threshold Guardians from hero myth stories; the angels have coordinated (not arranged) tests for us on Earth: the logos, neocortex divine standard for higher conceptual life that we have had to reach. This is the ultimate breeding-ground for gods. Gods must learn how to make themselves, and that's the only way to get out!
798
799
800
801The problem people have with existence being purely conceptual is that the contingent concepts ruling our world aren't explicit, they are implicit. What we have instead of straight-and-narrow pure concepts (angels helping the Old World Order and Illuminati, who then run their own operations filtering down neatly into all the phenomena), we actually in reality don't have just one mind modelling the concepts like this -- we have a grand, emulsifying collision of disparately varied and clashing, detailed concepts. Everyone's concepts are different, because their conceptual selection is different and the way they refract percepts from their own conceptualization is unique. They also then lack the mental tooling to consider how others think, how the world works on a meta level, and how all of this fits together.
802
803We can judge concepts by concepts. We can say that a difference between conceptualization A and conceptualization B is a conceptual difference. We literally create antithesis concepts by noumenal unconscious analysis like this.
804
805Percepts arise from concepts and their selection using other concepts. A mind can select the basis concepts, but it can then also plug these into premade functions. The totality of these operations is always given via the monad's "flat" wavefunction collapse. Mind allows conceptual mental sophistication of infinite variety and complexity, as long as we're basing everything around zero neatly in the final analysis. Which is actually an inescapable given, anyway, given the ontology of mind! So it's not possible for your monad to make an existential mistake. What a blowout for these contingent concepts! They just keep getting obliterated.. by reasoning. Reasoning is the grand creative process; the alma mater ["The school, college, or university that one has attended"]; the World Salve; the remedial medicine. Unconscious embellished reasoning gives us music, art and creative free expression, and we coordinate sensory delight by adding things freely in the creative exploration. You can create the perfect sandwich and make your food life heaven. Unconscious deliberated reasoning gives us consciousness.
806
807From where does the mind get its character? As we have to select something, we are pushed dialectically by other souls over many lives and by ourselves. The mere act of selection starts to unrough the soul, polishing the gem within. Our internal sinusoidal symmetries are then tested, over and over, until we make the generally right choices fast enough in the last grand race, with the biggest stretch of potential in microcosmic scale of evolutionary terms. In terms of individual character, we don't particularly even have a conscious aim a lot of the time. Life is not yet conscious enough for that! Ask again in a few lifetimes, a few hundred years from now. Character is something particular and specific, ultimately, that you're asking about. It's a contingent concept.
808
809You cannot trace the specific from the general. Mind is trying to go in the opposite way: towards resolving generalities, and gaining more and more general-use knowledge. This is given by the way that mathematics operates to find and pursue and integrate patterns, to go on to further achieve more. Computer AI is interested in generalizing pattern information. You don't deliberately go down a level to pure percepts like scientists. Scientists waste huge amounts of valuable human time on vanity projects -- they just can't tell that they're vanity projects. To an Illuminist, lifesize humanoid robots are a huge waste of time because it's got to carry a huge battery, which will never be mass produced, and it's a huge waste of electricity, and there are no sane use-cases for Terminators or care home worker robots anyway, not ones that could fit within our grand conception of the world and our global schema.
810
811With percepts, we are actually dialectically running over the products and outpourings of unindividuated souls(!) -- this is the "desert of the real" in The Matrix (1999) terms. We use the dead matter of dead souls to produce life! In this conception of the concept of "life", it's conscious souls which are living and unconscious souls which are considered to be "less alive" and thus dead. We are imposing a rational mathematical spectrum and just extrapolating from that. Most concepts can be broken down into other concepts like so. Fourier mathematics operates in similar ways. Sinusoids yield all these properties because mathematics, and only ontological mathematics, encapsulates the ability to encode and describe and conceptually model any one sinusoid via a combination of any others. We can use our conceptual mind-space to do this, unconsciously, at any time;- the simple proof is that you can consciously know that 1 + 1 = 2, and that has to have been facilitated in full and genuine authentic capacity by ultimate basis reality! Voila!
812
813
814
815If we all had an angel unconscious, we would be able to judge and project everything intuitively by its generalized utility factor -- or we could do something else even better, such as encapsulating that concept within another enclosing concept which adds some other utility, and so on. The fact that you can conceive of this conceptually, and that you are already engaging concepts to be able to think any conscious thoughts, demonstrates that it is this infact which you're doing. You just don't encounter the latent means and excuses and barriers and other furnishings allowing you to do this. You haven't yet become fully conscious like an angel.
816
817Concepts are written all over computer programming. Computer syntax allows expression of conceptual piecemeal components (compiler developers call them "symbols", and the data like strings and numbers are called "literals") and this conceptual construction can take any contingent form. You can use as many brackets, as many levels of additional and enclosing indirection as you want to. You can encapsulate mathematical calculation functions or memory addressing (read/write) or classes' functions within other functions; whichever way you want. You can build concepts (code) which produce percepts (boxes of particular colours on the screen). Programming is something we ought to teach as many children as possible in the future, though with highly intuitive means akin to MonoGame, rather than dogged languages and frameworks such as C++ is tied into. We will eventually deliver Apollonian creative excitement highly intuitively, though this would be a long-term project and nothing of major use for humanity right now.
818
819Programming code happens in a template of schema (the code syntax tree as the compiler understands it). The syntax tree includes classes, functions, literals and combinatorial mathematical operators, and references to external code function calls. That's it. The program runtime delivers advanced concepts like recursive functions, different programming patterns (dynamic dispatch and inheritance), to produce a dynamic execution context whos datas and variables are influenced by the call stack and what the individual functions do to the objects and the memory. That's computer software in a nutshell. It's possible to write a C# interpreter within C# in 800 lines.
820
821Programming works so well because you can get reports and live feedback by however the code has been defined conceptually to run. Programmers get excited because programming delivers a kind of satisfying technical freedom that no other discipline has. You can engineer a plane, but you can't customize it at the microscopic scale to build intelligible conceptual macrostructures to your precise liking. You can never have a demoscene or ShaderToy created in the mundane world of corporate backlogs of consumer demand. Programming offers a certain kind of technical Apollonian expression, at least while you're convinced that such a thing has utility in the grand scheme of things. Angels are zero interested in programming, just as they're zero interested in art and poetry. Angels are ontological programmers; they make things happen for real, forever, for the monadic community. A typical programmer couldn't imagine so ambitiously, because programming means being locked into a sensory mindset for many hours at a time to truly focus.
822
823
824
825    "in existential terms" [para about wavefunction collapse and computer games] should be "in existential scope"
826
827
828
829
830If we try to imagine that concepts have character; if we try to conceptualize the will of concepts (and thus mind), we could say that they are always zoning in on something, as if to "zero in on" something.
831
832    zero in on
833
834    v. To aim precisely at a target
835
836    v. To successfully narrow down a search
837
838    v. To concentrate or focus one's attention on at task
839
840
841
842Percepts (the large objects we manipulate) are enlivened by concepts. Mind gives life to concepts, and the percepts operated on by the concepts reflect newly perceptual impressions inside the monad. The monad then works to reflex its concepts over the new conceptual framework (formulation) that has just been established in the feedback loop. Mind does this continuously in the various fancied ways that it requires.
843
844Since life is not one-dimensional but zero-dimensional with the continuous consult of the entire array of pristine sinusoids, we are not locked into any one conscious process which takes up all our mental focus or energy! We simply need to find the right mathematical way to define what we want to get out of it all ultimately. That's what's stopping us, not dimensionality of any kind. Science is barking completely up the wrong tree here.
845
846We become conscious of these processes we do in conceptual terms. That's enough. The angels aren't expecting us to do much else. What else can we be reasonably expected to do?
847
848
849
850    Shell not Schelle
851
852
853
854get quotes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19WORtE3xuM&t=27m YouTube
855
856
857
858Imagine you have your conceptualization represented by a yellow square, and someone comes to you with a problem that looks like a black square with its filling lines squiggling about. You now have to encapsulate both your solid clear thinking and someone's messed up conception of reality to be able to interoperate them. This is what's so tiring about dealing with lazy thinkers. Actually, when we say tiring we mean that we refuse to do it. (Unless we mean physically tiring). It doesn't appeal to us, so we'd rather chase down other dialectical threads. All that ever actually happens is completely mathematical posturing via completely mathematical minds.
859
860Tedious tasks generate no positive inherent motivation, because of costs versus rewards as our chief conceptions tell it. Everything about the way we configure our lives contributes to the output. All mathematical variables have real intelligible presence and clout. Comfort and the senses are important to get right.
861
862The more work that's put onto you, the more your monad is unable to conceptually handle it, and the ultimate result is the rejection of the workload (for whatever contingent circumstances and variables). In hero movies, the structure with the initial refusal of the call and the completion of the hero's journey is an abstract, symbolic presentation whose whole purpose is to stand available when reconstructed in your own mind conceptually. You will notice that with some learning methods we read a bit then experience a bit and synthesize that; sometimes we work hard at life for years and then suddenly come across a treasure trove of synthesization-enabling material for our present condition of mind. When the mind has reorganized itself via conceptual reintegration, it is free to take on new and ambitious tasks, and its rest and relaxation variables can drop out of the equation. This is what has happened to angels.
863
864
865
866We need to unite with others, but not in a mystical sense of our essential natures. We want the highest most conscious unification with god, not arbitrary non-definable unification. Imagine saying to someone that life is about Disney World and how we all love Christmas the same way therefore we should do something together. This is the consciousness promotion of mystical intuition. We want thinking intuitive innovations (rational individuation and godlike personas) not individuals who can't adapt or change by virtue of being locked into confirming only their intuitions. If you surround yourself with loonies talking about looking through the Eye of Horus, confidently asserting themselves as an authority of no background dependency, you've reached insanity, not reasoning. It stands to reason that even mystical intuitives become tired and disappointed with one another. If there is no rational test, the dialectic cannot generate new strands.
867
868
869
870"I think most people see drawing as subservient to the subject, a sort of meditation, a studying, a searching observation, in my case, for its own sake." - Peter Wright
871
872How does the concept come to completion? It must find substance in something it wants to select. We never take lead from percepts, but conceptual mathematical selections; some highly abstract. When you meet a new highly intuitive person, your local conception is wholly transformed from what it would usually be, and something clicks and we get excited. When people "click" they have found a shared mathematical locus of exploration, and mathematically their souls puzzle over one another, fitting in abstract like puzzle pieces. If love is information then conceptualization provides and steers romance, electric friendships, stable relationships.
873
874
875
876"The historian is terribly responsible to what he can discern are the facts of the case, but he's nothing if he doesn't make out a case." - Howard Nemerov
877
878Judgement and synthesis are the final test.
879
880
881
882"There is no such thing as objective information. Zero, in the end, journalism is the product of a human mind." - Diethard Ried (Code Geass)
883
884Sinusoids are basis concepts, which means they are forms. Sinusoids are not information. You can't ever have eternal or necessary information. All thoughts (combinatorial sinusoidal math) come with an agenda; a flowing mathematical originator in Becoming (a single unit monad).
885
886Strangely, we never completely identify unit monads, we just take their outputs and move on.
887
888"Lelouch, do you know why snow is white? Because it's forgotten what color it's supposed to be." - C.C. (Code Geass)
889
890Judgement and definition and individuation are what the anima, man's divine inner image of woman, wants him to reach for. C.C. is a Phoster or Archon character.
891
892"In the face of the world's wills, your personal speculations are so ephemeral they can't help being overwhelmed.” - C.C.
893
894Clarity is key. Angels want accuracy for you.
895
896"Riesman’s four types:
897
898Other-directed (primary influence = peer group)
899
900Tradition-directed (primary influence = ancient religious traditions)
901
902Inner-directed (primary influence = parents)
903
904Autonomous (primary influence = oneself)"
905
906    Mike Hockney
907
908
909
910    Clarity is key. Angels want accuracy for you. -> [add] Think objectively and realize self-awareness. Objective thinking is extremely difficult and extremely rewarding and potentious.
911
912
913
914Minds must collapse a thought continuously. The PSR necessitates it and if we flop we are left with the least of the worst (the Ignavi, the indecisive lost souls, reproduced this in politics). We are thus pushed along if we can think at all! This is the only type of existence possible because if all minds can think, then they must all think. There can be no privilege. You literally cannot imagine not-thinking, s if it's a choice. Because it's a thought. If non-existence and flat Nothing with no background dependency cannot exist (cannot give rise to Something), then neither can non-thought. The God Series #32 and The Truth Series mention the flowing point.
915
916
917
918Imagine if an angel appeared to you where you are now. What would the angel say to you that you'd take independently of the ego shattering glow of an actual angel? What would you benefit from it? What would the angel get out of that interaction? You have to start to see things conceptually, not perceptually. Scientists of an empirical mindlock will never achieve this. Percepts could never dictate the world's machinations as powerfully as concepts. Science's view is absurd because it places arbitrary locks and limits on what life can be (as soon as we start thinking highly conceptually or highly intuitively).
919
920
921
922Only concepts hold power, and that's because minds and mental conception, and only together, yield selective individuational agency and selective power. Percepts are always at the behest and hold of concepts. Scenarios are. Events and governments are. Social revolutions and upsets are. Concepts can rule the world because concepts are intelligible. Percepts are not. Concepts are adaptable and interoperable via minds; percepts are not and percepts come gridlocked within the schema and manufacturing shape they have been proposed. Percepts are derivations and effects; concepts precede definitional substance and substantial definition. Concepts can be configured exactly because the mind-space is primary and dimensionality is "virtual".
923
924
925
926Intuition has ways to probe value of something (possible, projected, estimated value). Some of these are primitive and crude; some are highly nuanced and sophisticated. We engage in several "tells" about an object or information of desire. We use our internal indexes (really, conceptual methods and functions) to derive a guess of whether something is worth our effort. Within this function, must be plugged in all our variables about when we get tired, what we believe we are generally getting from life, and how good we think life is for our potential to open it up. This is the mathematical definition of how people are influenced by their early mortal life impressions (statements like "I can't do that", which are derived from traumas and negative impressions and comparisons of the Self to the Other). It's objective thinking which strips away and unveils these discontinuities and contradictions in our thinking. Consciousness, and ultimately god-consciousness, aims to have nothing left to examine that it has not refactored into its most general terms of selection (conceptualization).
927
928
929
930Do you feel alive? Is there a switch in your brain that makes you feel a slow burning pleasure at certain times and not at all at others? Is there a natural buzz or high?
931
932In BDSM, sub space is where the submissive feels a slow, burning, purring rolling sensation. It's not a physical sensation but a mental sensation; the psychological implications of being paid utmost attention to and being sexually satisfied, objectified and wanted. Mathematically, souls can choose their own destinies as they become conscious, and it's all about what makes us consistently stably happy or contented; some souls have not yet worked out the variables and conditions for maximizing pleasure (autonomy) via other means, and herein spells all the mystery of human interaction, human interdependency, human jealousy, human extroversion and so on. It's all math. It's all part of an actualizable god equation. You never actually want to stay in the same place with the same person forever. Existence is about freedoms, freedom for everyone, and convergence on the ultimate freedom from circumstance (godhood and divinity and complete rational clarity).
933
934
935
936Universal comes in the same clique as Necessary, Analytical and Absolute. Sinusoids are universal. All minds can use sinusoids. You can't have universal information, in the same way that you can't have absolute information. Information is always presented in contingent form via contingent monadic thoughts, formulated through contingent concepts. What we really mean to say when expressing contingent concepts versus ontological concepts is that thought itself restructures in a way akin to how ultimate reality is defined. Thought of course must have some similarities structurally to ultimate reality. If only we knew it and stripped out the dogma and labelling: thought is reality! Thought is god. Thought is a living exploration of god (mathematics, the absolute pristine language of eternity). We are all children of eternity longing for connective unity of the highest principal order (that of settling and satisfying every last need of one another). Existence in these terms is incredibly numinous and can be highly emotional and cathartic (as if to explain all of your life's purpose emotionally and provide some deep soothing). This is what mystical intuitives wanted us to know, and of course we do if we think hard enough. The story Sousei no Aquarion presents exactly this kind of image semantically, but only highly intuitive souls would ever get a strongly coded message like this. It features an Archon character who wishes to unite with the protagonist (called Apollo). It features reincarnation as part of the main plot and backstory.
937
938"It was announced during AnimeJapan 2015 that the Aquarion franchise will be receiving a third series, Aquarion Logos ..." - Anime Planet
939
940
941"Frisson (French for 'shiver'), also known as aesthetic chills, musical chills, and colloquially as a skin orgasm, is a psychophysiological response to rewarding auditory and/or visual stimuli that induces a pleasurable or otherwise positively-valenced affective state and transient paresthesia (skin tingling or chills), sometimes along with piloerection (goose bumps) and mydriasis (pupil dilation). The sensation commonly occurs as a mildly to moderately pleasurable emotional response to music with skin tingling; piloerection and pupil dilation do not necessarily occur in all cases. The psychological component (i.e., the pleasurable feeling) and physiological components (i.e., parasthesia, piloerection, and pupil dilation) of the response are mediated by the reward system and sympathetic nervous system, respectively. The stimuli that produce this response are unique to each individual.
942
943"Frisson is of short duration, lasting only a few seconds. Typical stimuli include loud passages of music and passages—such as appoggiaturas and sudden modulation—that violate some level of musical expectation. During a frisson, a sensation of chills or tingling felt on the skin of the lower back, shoulders, neck, and/or arms. The sensation of chills is sometimes experienced as a series of 'waves' moving up the back in rapid succession and commonly described as "shivers up the spine". Hair follicles may also undergo piloerection.
944
945"It has been shown that some experiencing musical frisson report reduced excitement when under administration of naloxone (an opioid receptor antagonist), suggesting musical frisson gives rise to endogenous opioid peptides similar to other pleasurable experiences. Frisson may be enhanced by the amplitude of the music and the temperature of the environment. Cool listening rooms and cinemas may enhance the experience. "
946
947    Wikipedia
948
949Which are the Frisson Stories? They are the Higher Self, Transcendental stories and dreams. Immortals is another Frisson Story.
950
951Frisson can last a lot longer than a few seconds! It can come in purring ebbs and flows, depending on the psychological and cosmic impact of the music and feeling you’re going through, which all centers around spiritual implications (universals semantically uniting with the contingencies surrounding our relationship with the world and its converging, divine meaning). Frisson is deeply personal. It all depends on the percepts, and how you get into that state of mind, and what you have in Active Imagination to work with – this is all conceptually wrapped with your soul contents, the most important component to anything concerning how you generate thoughts.
952
953Angels = the Frisson Species. Immortals is actually a movie that is able to transmit this thought to you.
954
955
956
957"... We are thus led to the concepts of molecular weight and atomic weight." - Max Born
958
959Concepts are a handy way for the mind to reach a common conscious locus of interest around which it can model further mental appratus and functioning. Concepts must exist for angels to be able to influence the wavefunction. Concepts must exist for humans to become conscious. Percepts given under no background dependency confer no such powers or flexibilities. Percepts by themselves are always mired in the configuration (form) they are presented. That's exactly because percepts are the results of minds, i.e. 1) mind generates thoughts which are separate from percepts and which inform percepts as we can engage ultimately with those minds, and 2) we are already thinking, so we don't need primary reliance on percepts.
960
961The grand elephant in the room is that we are all part of a sleepy monadic community that, as soon as it wakes up, will totally rewrite the world and these existential mires of circumstantial living terms. As soon as you grasp something this profound, there's no going back, and you've accepted the red pill. The purpose of the soul is to rewrite the world, and it does this purely through consciousness. Consciousness is the springboard to divinity and all the humming hubbub of good, airy feelings that a Phoster Planet society will bring. Feelings and emotions are an important component of life. It's important to be able to become happy about what the future will bring us. We are allowed to use intuition and feelings together.
962
963Conduct your life well; be healthy.
964
965
966
967Percepts are not actually thoughts; they are the results of thoughts. They are sinusoids transformed into new forms via dimensionality, which is itself a mathematical locus of control, which is exactly why the universe can become conscious of itself. Consciousness involves reflection of conceptual math upon conceptual math within a well-defined ontology of conception. This means that we can conceive of the properties of conception! There is literally infinite variation of possible thoughts, but of course thoughts themselves are never unwedded from the circumstances of contingent form (math sitting within zero-dimensional eternity) that we wanted to draw up clarity on. That's why thinking works. Thinking by any other means or ontology would be impossible. Thinking implies the ontological ability to raise consciousness. Thinking must be something done under a complete and consistent ontology and language (ontological mathematics). There's no way around that because as we learn, we are forced to integrate more conceptual knowledge. You will have known as you were growing up that the more you learned, the more your intuitive knowledge converged on the same kind of "character". This is an individual cell of god starting to become conscious of consciousness.
968
969
970
971"If we propose to apply the statistical method to the theory of gases, the method of procedure must be essentially different; for an enumeration of the molecules which, for example, occupy a given element of volume at a given moment is utterly impossible. We must therefore proceed indirectly, first introducing assumptions which appear plausible, and then building up the theory on these as foundation. As with every scientific theory, the final warrant for the correctness of the assumptions is the agreement of their logical consequences with experience." - Max Born
972
973Angels suffer no problems with getting their way in first with the ontological wavefunction collapse. This is because angels proceed from concepts, and because concepts order actualized reality, from the zero-dimensional eternal domain of ontological mathematics. Concepts which provision for the dimensionality which gives rise to atoms, and gases, and their common locus of interoperability, are for angels akin to the concepts we own about which way the blades of grass will blow in the wind, or the direction a snail is trying to go. Angels own universal, eternal knowledge as well as contingent knowledge. All phenomena in our world must be provisioned according to some pattern, and this must only proceed from certain key, grand concepts. The upshot of this is that the more conceptual your mind becomes; the more sophisticated and symmetrical your use of sinusoids, your thoughts start to model and emulate the PSR, which is where gods sit. This allows your mental precision to simply far outstrip that of the lower orders of souls, i.e. humans and animals and insects and plants and cellular life, and all the 99% of souls which didn't even reach this level of inflexion of unconscious will to power.
974
975Max Born talks about concepts, so he injects concepts to try to make sense of reality but then fumbles by making it clear that although he rejects conceptual analysis being prior to all phenomena, he has actually had to restate something of grand dogmatic and philosophical weighting just to make a point about gases. For an angel, this is not conscious or empirical but unconscious and automatic and deeply conceptually baked into the angel mind. Angels thus never struggle with having to sit outside of what they want to do via after-the-fact, floating carefully-considered thinking (scientific empiricism and empirical data and the wariness of "anecdotal evidence"), as such a reality wouldn't make any sense at all (you wouldn't work for something that didn't provide your monad with maximum conscious will to power and maximized clarity, and you could not mechanize a universe without a constant reach for improvement). Mathematics thus literally dialectically finds consciousness of itself via the prevailing dialectical emulsion and clashing of different arrayed parallel wills to power; details; methods and functions of life (archetypes! Archetypes are unconscious will strivings from grand animal souls, where consciousness is a conscious one) via the principle of maximization and optimization (maximization in view of outcomes).
976
977Angels have decided to converge somewhat on the maximization of Self and World. At that point, you don't actually get a choice because worlds are far behind you. Gods are like the star student at school trying to do its best. There is no space for hostility, or as ENTJs can project, egotism. It's not what's being proposed. Conceptual existence means full control over what's being proposed, and it never quite has a concrete consistent character (only information does; but only at the point of reference, where the wave becomes the particle as in wave-particle duality, which is a reflection of the floating point).
978
979
980
981What did dinosaurs live like? Dinosaurs were bodies you could have been piloting many many years ago. Today we use crushed dinosaur juice to power our cars. Dinosaurs would have been under the influence of archetypes. There existed a collective unconscious for dinosaurs (since no human embodied life gains any such privilege over nonhuman life) and the dinosaurs were trapped in the conflicting unconscious world of fight-or-flight. We can today see similar strands of activity in the lives of cats as they playfight, preparing their young for the road ahead. Unconscious life selects as it must. Conscious life selects as it imagines, ponders, proliferates and astounds. We are allowed to pull in all the magic of life and all the best ways to get results.
982
983
984
985Listen to the Kingsman soundtrack. Your unconscious mind is alive.
986
987
988
989A sufficiently conscious mind can organize a book however it wants. It can coordinate the "colourful" dimensions like mythos versus logos. To intuition, all this appears. It cannot appear to the senses. It must be conceptual. Concepts allow us to refit and reintegrate conceptual configurations as we please. None of this ever has to enter the realms of percepts; it runs the ranges over the percepts instead.
990
991
992
993How do we refit abstract conceptual knowledge about what all of life is to us (the character and quantities of ontological existence or world schemas), or how our lives will pan out in the near future as opposed to the near moment? It's simple - our conceptualizations inform how we can further appropriate, attribute and coordinate other conceptual knowledge, of which we are routinely informed in places by percepts. Percepts prompt us; concepts educate us. Percepts can never be educational. Only conceptual reformulation and reintegration (i.e. thinking) is what educates us. The mind is both subject and object in Dual Aspect Monism, so it's not so much that an external agency or prompt was always educating you; we could just as well say that your mind was reaching the lesson. The key here is that mathematical interactions are bi-directional and totally fully mathematically coherent. That comes built into an existence of all the monads operating on a shared spacetime blackboard (substratum). None of this is strictly, technically extensional. There are no true objects in existence; only subject-objects. How we conceptualize about existence is not existence itself; we can never reach being able to conceptualize all the contingent form in the universe in totality; we can conceptualize about absolutes and the eternal, necessary universal order (ontological form) but this itself doesn't grant us the power to change the universe or to read everyones' minds at once and redirect those thoughts. If anything a god can do is of this nature, then we can safely conclude that it's fully within the means delivered by ontological mathematical form and its contingent operation in zero-dimensional eternity. The principal things humans should be concerned with is grasping and making clear all this overarching conceptual knowledge from ontological mathematics.
994
995Concepts of course either come from “within” (conception) or “without” (learning).
996
997
998
999If you think about it, percepts like the spatiotemporal form of your room are a cluster of noumenal pivoting around which you can think. You can coordinate your actions by your physical interoperation with spacetime matter, or you can think consciously to yourself by filtering visuals and matter out. This is a key point for angels, and it's something they are acutely aware of. Angels possess such staggering intuition that they are routinely unconsciously made available to the types of insights such as how the design of a room permits spacetime travel to and from a nearby place, and the energies expended, and the patterns and coordinations of physicality which are then projected further upon conceptual query, on demand. An angel's mind is fritzing with unneeded dialectical oppositions like this in the background; they are mostly junk, but the angel unconsciously traces them all if they can lift useful value. Angel minds are incredibly futuristic.
1000
1001Angels can “see” numbers everywhere if they want to, exactly like Neo in The Matrix at the end. The key difference is that this increased freedom, in ontological reality, is a conceptual awareness of numbers – not a distracting visual awareness! It’s where you can design, pattern and arrange the types of structures whereby numbers would appear (visually it could present like turning a kaleidoscope; this is the perceptual “view” of what some shifting form itself “looks like”). Mike Hockney talked about seeing a frequency representation along with your eyes’ vision. But the whole point of existence, and conception, is that you don’t need particular “special cases” or “special pleadings” in this sense of irreducibility. Angels don’t need to think about local frequencies of the spacetime domain, because their thoughts are ranged on massively abstract, nuanced, conceptual conceptions of thought which aren’t at all to do with human frames of reference about what would be useful to think about. Angels are foundationally free from how we live (all our spatiotemporal dogmatic baggage). And it’s all in the mind (the difference in conception). Angels don’t require any helpers, crutches or special adaptations to their environment, their percepts (the human body) or anything else. Angels are never “putting on an act”; it’s literally just flat principle-of-maximization we are seeing from them.
1002
1003Your coordination via spacetime matter is an extension of your abilities as a monad! All spacetime is virtual, and we are conceptually extending our capabilities when we develop our conceptualization towards god-consciousness.
1004
1005All of spacetime exists -- let's not forget -- as a grand mathematical space full of content by which gods can lift themselves up to gnosis. Angels are acutely aware of this and wish that Illuminists would see this in clearer conceptual terms. What's most needed, we might say, is all around you and right under your nose! It's easy to get overcome with despair and schematic entrenchment such that your spirit is low (as the anomic and cynical individuals of society have achieved) but you also note that thinking itself is unhindered and unattached from this. Thought is reality and every thought is a strand of god. We must become free from Old World Order schema, and this is one of the highly deeply unconscious intuitions that was available to access. To put it into practice is actually a discipline of sinusoidal supersymmetry. You don't see angels suffering to do this. That's because ontological mathematics is zero-dimensional and life is not one-dimensional; doesn't go only on one track with one presumed, valid narrative. The mainstream media is a noise signal, and we want to reach a high signal-to-noise ratio.
1006
1007"Signal-to-noise ratio (abbreviated SNR or S/N) is a measure used in science and engineering that compares the level of a desired signal to the level of background noise. SNR is defined as the ratio of signal power to the noise power, often expressed in decibels. A ratio higher than 1:1 (greater than 0 dB) indicates more signal than noise. " - Wikipedia
1008
1009
1010
1011Can you consciously switch to neocortex thinking? Angels can.
1012
1013
1014
1015"This wealth of experiences, personal and professional, have helped me appreciate the variety of perspectives that present themselves in every case that I hear." - Sonia Sotomayor
1016
1017Last Man culture has become estranged from the fruitful experiences, the good "wholesome" experiences, that surround the idealized American Dream concept of life. You must learn how to rework this for yourself. As ever, we only get God Game Planet existence in order to dialectically advance towards god-consciousness. You must develop your own internal eternal solutions for temporal, contingent problems - and then your soul will own them forever. Your persona and morality is what we might call (at a stretch) the necessary form for this to happen. In fact, it's a contingent form and the gods will help you when they absolutely have to (gods are not allowed to minimize meaning in any way, shape or form; gods lock their own actions from themselves).
1018
1019
1020
1021Angels don't wish for us to live on a better planet, simply because angels are of the mental acuity (clarity) to know that this is the best environment for us to evolve; that a Phoster Planet wouldn't possess as much dialectical opposition; and such a thing arises only when human souls have the strength in reasoning to absolutely fundamentally push for this in whatever ways necessary; and this must come from a pure, indomitable strength of spirit. What does the modern Illuminati look like to an angel?
1022
1023It cannot be overstated that this is already the essential environment we will ever get; the means we have are available very similarly in principal terms on other Phoster Planets and Archon Planets. The act and goal of life wasn't to transcend away from living on an Archon Planet, but to develop such that we wouldn't be affected negatively by being in any scenario in general. The answer to existence is clarity of will to power; consciousness; full control over sinusoidal expression. It's the only answer there is, and we are just as well served in the overarching sense here, as on current Phoster Planets (there is no great help for the most advanced souls, which have to help themselves in the end). You don't get anything fundamentally better on other planets. The angels' disposition becomes clearer and clearer as the human mind is cleansed hyperrationally. We cannot express it other than conceptually via our own monadic consciousness, and this comes in conceptual form, not in concrete myriad expressions of content for all to see. Angels are waiting for you to glimpse grand thoughts like this. Of course we should free all the other human souls as very soon as possible. But there are rational constraints to be consciously respected. Angels, symbolically and semantically and archetypally, must stride both of these sides of the human condition perfectly and mutually/bidirectionally well. This comes built into ontological existence based around zero and infinity. It comes with the level of conception of your own mind at this stage (consciousness).
1024
1025The past doesn’t ontologically exist.
1026
1027
1028
1029“Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one”
1030
1031― Bruce Lee
1032
1033
1034Batches of thought (phases in life) start from a single “antisymmetry” operation. You build something based on ever-changing and -adapting circumstances around you, and you are capable of greatness given that your access to the full range of sinusoids in infinite dimensions is real and binding on your thoughts all the time. You dialectically learn by your lives. Your current sensory and emotional experience signals of this particular life is the abstract analytical mathematical expression left over from your previous lives’ calculations and coordinations pressing you into this one. The world’s phenomenal, overt and aesthetic trends also take hold of the shape of this, but in a shallow way. Your life intermeshes as a condition or variable with other monads’ parallel net behaviours and selections. Gods can know you by concepts.
1035
1036
1037
1038How do everyday businesses know their product and service offerings can't be exploited? Because of concepts. Concepts are built into structure, architecture, coordination and design. Concepts allow you mental assurance because it allows you to sidestep the reliance on perception of percepts altogether, in a given domain i.e. within a given conditionality where you can drop something out of the equation / conceptualization.
1039
1040Businesses work on mounting compounds of concepts: interdependency (supply), responsiveness (customer feedback and profitability), social organization and information promotion and carrying (remember how we did the carry operation in school with math? That's a conceptual wrapping). Everything on Earth and other God Game Planets is just concepts dressed up to be something else. In the same way that policemen and -women wear a special costume to make them conceptually not another civilian; and in the same way that politicians pretend they're anything but another civilian standing in their home across an entire country's ground of such individuals. We are all united and shaped by concepts, and concepts are the ultimate conscious way to understand existence. Percepts could never provoke the imagination in such a way (indeed, scientists never proffer the necessity for this capacity of percepts). Percepts cannot powerfully make choices like angels can, because percepts will always be in need of abstraction i.e. percepts can never get to conceptual execution and conceptual final clarity at all. Conceptual constitution is itself all we need in a universe conceptually held together. A universe of percepts could not stand in the way that a conceptual universe can be arranged via pure concepts. The kicker is that it's only the ingrained way we've thought about percepts, rather than schema (conceptualization), which delivers us this false conception of reality! When we become conscious (and we only principally have to do it once), we are free. When higher life starts to really coordinate this kind of thinking, we all start to become free which is just a conceptual, contingent side-effect of consciousness! It's really that clear and pristine, exactly as you would expect it to be. Thought and the PSR necessitates this.
1041
1042
1043"In the best material, you always should be able to somehow make a case for a story to be transposed to any other time." - Ralph Fiennes
1044
1045This is a reflection of the universal. Concepts aim for the universal, because in generalizing our held/suspended mathematical selector functions, that's how we find (coordinate) better outcomes for ourselves. We are always striving, truly, within a context and a contextual direction (which is constantly being conceptually refined and redesigned and refitted). This is how concepts have dialectical capacity, and that's how the dialectic is ever brought about (it comes inbuilt with reality via the unit monad). As we are always moving towards particulars which are narrowed down via conceptualization which gets better and better, we are chasing universal qualifiers and qualifications ("indexes" and means and operations and methods and functions) so we can zero in on what we want. It's mathematically guaranteed that life and mind would have to operate this way, as there's literally nothing else for it to do that is still thought and not non-thought (which cannot exist just as Nothing with no background dependency cannot exist because it cannot give rise to Something). Mind must reach for things it wants, and if this is so then it must want to improve its outlook and outcomes and circumstances (which come with the act and properties of conception; that is to say, it comes with the PSR) and if this is so, mind must generalize or get to a point to be able to (this is how we can routinely locate and differentiate anything, the proofs of which can start from the visual math we do, such as converting zero-dimensional numbers into a 2d reticle when we use a mouse or a video game). The result of generalization and coordination using the spatiotemporal domain as vehicle to execution means that we are fully plugged into reality, and reality is god. These statements are mutually compatible and they are not commensurate with anything otherwise. They come together or they can never come. As mandates the PSR.
1046
1047
1048
1049The angels know that as you get hyper-conscious life gets easier. The angels are in no way "worried about you", just as the gods never had to worry about the angels. As above, so below. You don't worry about how humans get on, and humans don't worry about how animals get on because there is always the wings of higher life to enclose us – conceptually.
1050
1051
1052Some stories are more powerful with subtle homoeroticism. Sexually, the same gender is left sexually Sacred in the event that the psyche or persona is drawn away from the opposite sex. 4chan denizens reported that they felt more comfortable with "girls with dicks" and they wanted to break down this compulsion and psychoanalyze it. Abuse victims have other sexual options open if they are traumatized and triggered. We are a dialectical species, operating in a conceptual mathematical capacity. We don't have to fret, because everything will be resolved soon to perfect conscious clarity.
1053
1054Conceptually, our world reflects what has been done to it and visited upon its soul. But we don't have to conceptually grasp and visit responsibility of all the conceptual detail;- that, it needs to be made clear, is not required, owing to the absolute power of conceptual thinking raised to higher efficiencies. This is something that needed to be made clear, for all the highly intuitive minds that were struggling on this point. The dialectical push and pull factors are also what's required to drive us here, to conscious control.
1055
1056
1057If we want to say, "writing is something that should make you complete and should develop yourself"; that's an explicit statement, where we could instead be demonstrating it implicitly (via subtext) as part of something grander. This is also one act and then another, where instead we could supersede its efficiency with one particular different act which then projects-ahead, intuitively, another possibility-branch; a better sequence of future outcomes. Need we remind ourselves, that this is exactly how video games work unconsciously. We are involved in conceptual branching operations via unconscious mathematical functions, which take in sets of variables and conditions and conditionalities (mathematical predictive estimations of events and conceptual collections of functions and concepts) all set to collapse to some eventuality in due course and in consistent, conceptual functional fashion. Math is life! Anything involving absolute, ontological necessary eternal math must reflect that principal mathematical nature and quality. The question is always to what extents; and whether it's a genuine, sincere and full-through-deep enough rendition of reality. This is also the same way that we find words as we're writing, in that we conceptualize to trace outcomes ahead (we anticipate). (In a “difficult” sentence we suspend the conscious mind, sweeping and searching and shifting myriad different inner conceptions to select an appropriate best-fit word). It comes as obvious that angels can trace ahead to act the best, so why not humans? Why not have Intuition present in this capacity? We think in parallel, and we can select mathematically because of parallel presentation of mental contents. Thinking would be impossible without multiple mathematical things to be selected -- and you can't exteriorly tack-on things in a linear fashion without due justification; the eternal infinite range of sinusoids is the perfect supply in this conceptual scenario. We think to reflect the PSR. We cannot "add" thoughts to eternity. Which means.. we are only ever unveiling eternity's zero-dimensional, rational mathematical qualities. But also, we are god which is living eternal conception. Both these two statements are commensurate with one another. They are actually the same thing. If we say we're only reflecting reality, it must also be true that we are acting reality(!). Information breathes detail and expression. Mind is eternally becoming.
1058
1059
1060Since ontological mathematics is absolute and universal, the conceptual ramifications for ourselves are linked with the conceptual ramifications for others. This is part of how the subject-object and Dual Aspect Monism are interlinked, so that we are always plugged into a type of reality we can't escape from in one aspect only or the other. There is no sufficient justification to split off these elements, or to choose between them if they are insurmountable barriers. As such, no such barriers or distinctions can be drawn. The PSR sees to this. Life and mind can only come with subject-objects (unit monads) and Dual Aspect Monism and Self universal math being directly interoperable and dialectically-compatible with World universal math. Life cannot be configured any other way due to there being no sufficient reason for such splits or inconsistencies or specifications (we are suspiciously bereft of any sufficient reason or cause for this).
1061
1062Interleaving is how the linear is derived from the parallel consistently (as a line is a circle of infinite radius) and how the finite is derived from the infinite and the absolute. In this sense, the “leaving” of the particular qualities and (s)traits (like romance in The Matrix, or as Otacon asked in Metal Gear Solid, whether love can bloom on the battlefield) are derived from the particular parallel and symmetrical qualities expressed in full dimensional “bloom”. It’s wholly and entirely how we know and understand something, after all, that we can wield it and forge it into shape. Blooming implies a deliberately conscious, intented, beatiful pattern. In the case of private romantic love, this is exactly what’s being proposed. Souls strive to romantically optimize their chances and this spells all the mystery about heartbreaks, how people reunite, how people find true love worth skipping country for(!), and so on. Souls chiefly concern themselves with maximizing on the basis of broad santifying principles;- of which, love and spirituality are chief goals and interests.
1063
1064sanctify (săngkˈtə-fīˌ)►
1065
1066    v.    To set apart for sacred use; consecrate.
1067    v.    To make holy; purify.
1068    v.    To give religious sanction to, as with an oath or vow: sanctify a marriage.
1069
1070
1071Illuminism (ontological mathematics) is of course a santifying process: it “cleanses” the soul and it makes pure and holy everything within its grasp and reach. It saves the soul and it saves life and it saves or serves the world.
1072
1073Souls are sacred entities, and thus, quite unsurprisingly, they reflect Sacred properties and goals under the hood. To make pure is of course to flesh-out, or to dialectically refine. The microcosmic version of this is simply what’s the most real for these such souls. Your aims and dreams range far more abstract than others’.
1074
1075“Do not mock people for having dreams!!” - Koichi Kawato
1076
1077“A person who never forgets the most important thing of all… the importance of having a dream, and reaching for that dream. That’s what an educator should be.” - Koichi Kawato
1078
1079Do not mock peoples’ dreams.
1080
1081Do you need a spiritual soothing song, once in a blue moon? Try “Out Of Darkness” from the Devil May Cry 4 soundtrack;-
1082
1083“The light in your eyes an angel up high
1084Fighting to ease the shadow side
1085Hearts will grow through having to bend
1086Leaving behind all things in the end”
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091“Everything for everyone, and nothing for ourselves”
1092
1093  - revolutionary saying
1094
1095
1096
1097How should you think of people? Of scientists? Are they conceptual minds, with agendas, for example? You should think of them however you need to, which will already be fulfilled and visited by your conceptualization powers of your mind. The way you think about other souls will shift and rotate through many different variations, which are different expressions of the sinusoidal symmetries you are dialectically testing within your monad. Life is "innocent" in this sense, which is a new thing for us and naturally comes with the divine phase of reality. Everyone can eventually be thoroughly, fully forgiving and accepting of everyone. This comes with hyper-consciousness and The Higher Self.
1098
1099
1100
1101Mecha animes were all about the ultimate machine ideal -- the unconscious -- striving for greatness and underthreaded competency in all things; generalized competency, which borders on consciousness almost but is still strongly archetypal and thus, to speak for the right brain here, “free” by which is meant, holism of course; if you could imagine; it is reflecting the concept of holism getting its good expression, but with inspiration we are considering a concept for mass society. This must have been how animals used archetypes to define sentience archetypally. The Shadow is often depicted in a crazed, blindly swiping capacity until it can individuate, like a lost soul or a pet. We are entertaining the idea of the Will to Power as it flies in the face of adversity: first its motion is scattered and hamfisted and muddled; then it climbs to sinusoidal symmetry. The Shadow always darts about, or laterally; never straight along the line. The quest of life is becoming the god, where all internal issues are resolved and a picture of eternal supersymmetry is achieved (and thus "detachment" from material occupations). Perfection means the end to interdependency with other monads in that dimension of perfection. Perfection means as perfection does. Your own conceptualization of perfection is itself a speculational modelling. You have a Selector Function.
1102
1103In the best Gundam stories, the machines are the mental extensions enabling the best pilots to become superheroes (self-sacrificial Grail Knights). The mechanical machine in Gurren Lagann has a mind of its own and functions properly only when the main character, Simon, is fully intrinsically motivated. He can’t ever force the machine to boot up. He has to be committed to his Sacred Cause in the right symmetrical alignment first. Note that this is a particularly odd and suspicious inclusion of psychoanalytical insight to a typical TV show about robots – especially given the show’s ending and conclusion which involves the collapse of the entire universe into nothing, leaving a visual infinity symbol on the screen. Simon’s “mechanism” is of course actually his unconscious mind. We have to connect with the unconscious mind – we have to undergo it, understand it and know it “inside-out”. This is the deeper meaning behind where Albert Camus said that we had to undergo experience instead of just analytically theorizing about it.
1104
1105The liminality between proof vs. evidence for the divine reaches of the soul is our own selves. We can show ourselves, through consciousness, that minds can climb so high. We are of the form of the unit monad. If we can get here, then others will someday - and life will be unforgettably different, vibrant, and we will figure out how to construct the very most sublime experiences; the numinous; the divine. Or else we won't need them so readily.
1106
1107This book was composed to soundtracks of the stories mentioned (playing constantly). And some old Western movie themes, and some Opera, carefully selected for uplifting and existential semantics in the music. The numinous; the divine. It helps that none of this music has English lyrics. The unconcscious goal here that we can reach in life is to find Sacred Cause music which meshes and resonates with our soul the strongest. This is strictly a parallel difference; a holism.
1108
1109If you want to write a book or engage any creative project you will have to create bad ones first. We not only dialectically shave and sculpt our creations this way, but we conceptually fill out the generalized known (derived; formulated; contingent) conceptual detail in that domain. It’s a domain of fleshing-out the experience in; it definitionally is something you will always have to learn something through, but of course you don’t make a blank project, or sink time in bad cost/benefit ratios; you find a sufficient need in good keeping with your maximization principle and you find something of sufficient interest and this is where we get convergence on intrinsic motivation and other types of motivation. Illuminated Writing is something that is so spiritually pure however that it cannot be extroverted in the case of extreme introverts. It definitionally is done via relating the contents of your own soul to your interests.
1110
1111
1112
1113Have you ever met someone that shared with you that they too experienced a projected phantom of their Higher Self in their teens? Floating before them and showing the way forward to individuation (perfection)? Now that is a life-changing experience. We love vindication.
1114
1115
1116
1117The purpose of your happiness is that you can be enabled to produce brighter things for your world.
1118
1119
1120
1121"[The Boss:] In 1960 I saw a vision of the ideal future from space. Three years earlier the Soviet Union had succeeded in launching Sputnik, the first manmade satellite in history, into orbit. This came as a huge shock to the United States. In response, America threw everything it had into its own manned space flight project, the Mercury project. Even as the Soviets seemed poised to send their first man into space America was still experimenting with chimpanzees in rockets. The government wanted human data. So they secretly decided to send a human being into space. I was the one they chose. At the time they didn't have the technology to block out cosmic rays and whoever they sent up would inevitably be exposed to heavy radiation. That's why they chose me. After all, I had already been irradiated once. Of course, you won't find any of this in the history books. I could see the planet as it appeared form space. That's when it finally hit me. Space exploration is nothing but another game in the power struggle between the US and USSR. Politics, economics, the arms race - they're all just arenas for meaningless competition. I'm sure you can see that. But the Earth itself has no boundaries. No East, No West, No Cold War. And the irony of it is, the United States and the Soviet Union are spending billions on their space programs and the missile race only to arrive at the same conclusion. In the 21st century everyone will be able to see that we are all just inhabitants of a little celestial body called Earth. A world without communism and capitalism... that is the world I wanted to see. But reality continued to betray me."
1122
1123    - Metal Gear Solid 3
1124
1125Concepts are all that mattered down here on Earth; no more in space did anything change; no more via promotion of contents and riches (percepts) can the planetary soul evolve. The life's wealth of struggles will have to contribute to the upheaval of our whole planetary society. Concepts rule existents and are primary, rather than percepts running anything. Percepts are not agreeable, mutable or interoperable in any primary, essential way. Mathematics is, and sinusoids are the perfect such basis concepts. Sinusoids are pristine and eternally reproducible by any soul which is why we can touch and taste and experience things. It's the synthesis of certain key psychological (conceptual) circumstances which permits us to have life-changing experiences of the Self. Carl Jung mentioned that many people will have reflective experiences of the Self archetype sometime in life in such a fashion. Of course, if you want to be drawn into the conceptual whirlpool and tornado of life clearer and with more inflexion, you have to jump right into the middle of it -- conceptually. No amount of percepts will help get you there. Percepts, in particular conceptual circumstance, is what trumps concepts alone. But nobody said concepts were ever without percepts to act upon. That wasn't being proposed. The best percepts (thoughts about space and the scale of the universe and mankind's significance) are infact chiefly reached or informed by rich conceptualization, not rich perception. And that is all the primary, chief difference we need. Concepts can generate percepts (circumstances and events). Nothing can ever happen the other way around, except by conceptual coordination. The percept didn't come from anything other than the concept.
1126
1127“The alchemical stone (the lapis) symbolizes something that can never be lost or dissolved, something eternal that some alchemists compared to the mystical experience of God within one's own soul. It usually takes prolonged suffering to burn away all the superfluous psychic elements concealing the stone. But some profound inner experience of the Self does occur to most people at least once in a lifetime.”
1128
1129- Carl Jung, Man and his Symbols (1978)
1130
1131It's also worth noting the immense human clarity which is possible by entertaining percepts and the percept-space (via the mind-space of course) to think about spacetime and civilizational human conceptual thoughts in such a sense. This is what you should be able to do with a monumental grasp of how the world at large actually works and is inter-related upon itself, therefore accessible via your own pure mind-space. This is the beginnings of how the angel psyche actually works and ranges itself conceptually over world events in tandem with input perceptory data (news headlines). Internally, we are all working on our own mathematical conceptual models of selection so that we can make sure none of the best thoughts, references, details, items of concern, or news, or logos, or experiences, pass us by unnoticed. This is inherently and strictly a selection; a conception.
1132
1133Concepts (East, West, national borders) rule the world. Percepts can shed no light on this at all. Scientists emphatically, technically, rationally, can never lift knowledge of human affairs by probing matter at a certain space and time! Utter madness. If there was a single way to get somewhere, it would be a generalized and generalizable process. That process is intuitive thinking (bolstered by the senses and emotions in their proper place in the psyche). It has nothing to do with sampling in a narrowminded, autistic, niche way. Scientists are allergic to "anecdotal evidence". There is anecdotal evidence all around your studies tying it together! What anecdotals did you not get? What's the sufficient reason for privileging any one study of data over another form of study? The explanation is that academics in general are thoroughly unconscious of how the Old World Order works and daren't ask their paymasters for an elevation of superiority and agency and ultimate authority, and this is a telling indicator that their intuition is flatlined and they have no imagination to begin with. The Venus Project was the intuitive scientific attempt at clinging to power and begging it to transcendentally evolve its own Ego practically overnight, to visit Communism With Technology upon the world in all nations. Nothing but intuitive thinking can ever deliver a truly inarguable, inevitable conclusion that the world must follow. Only intuitive thinking is adaptable and conscious enough to formulate and continually reformulate in the face of changing circumstances. The angels acutely understand all of this.
1134
1135At the end of our mortal lives, the death archetype allows us to re-asses in vivid intuitive conceptual clarity. This is because the near conceptual context has been paved and we have shifted our thoughts in such a way, by relocating them via a different conceptual mechanism of thinking. Circumstance is the perceptual version of this, though of course noumenal counterparts come built in with perceptual temporal circumstance. Mind mirrors matter in the ways that have been dialectically successful thus far. Mind cannot arise consciousness out of being detached from matter. Matter is the substrate for mind's experiment and "play". Matter thus informs thoughts of mind of the mind’s own unconscious stripes, in exactly the categorical ways we would expect such a marriage of form and content to do. When mind has become ultra conscious, it thusly has no more need of matter and can divorce itself from unconscious contingency supplied by matter's percepts, prompts and reminders. We are all moving in this direction at differing parallel rates (multimensional movement; which is given in parts in terms of shape, which is to say conception, over an infinintely dimensional sinusoidal webbing).
1136
1137Deep Space can be seen as a sort of archetype for higher life and the detachment from lower life, ascending toward the divine and the Apollonian. It's all in how we habitually conceptualize it. Connotations and associations always spring up, and this is the simple proof of conceptual existence. Mind seemingly generates percepts out of nowhere (to an uninspired, unimaginative empiricist). The inspired of humanity are the most highly intuitive. They are the ones that intuitively "see" interconnections everywhere.
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142“There are two reasons why man loses contact with the regulating center of his soul. One of them is that some single instinctive drive or emotional image can carry him into a one-sidedness that makes him lose his balance. This also happens to animals; for example, a sexually excited stag will completely forget hunger and security. This one-sidedness and consequent loss of balance are much dreaded by primitives, who call it, "loss of soul." Another threat to the inner balance comes from excessive daydreaming, which in a secret way usually circles around particular complexes. In fact, daydreams arise just because they connect a man with his complexes; at the same time they threaten the concentration and continuity of his consciousness.
1143
1144“The second obstacle is exactly the opposite, and is due to an over-consolidation of ego-consciousness. Although a disciplined consciousness is necessary for the performance of civilized activities (we know what happens if a railway signalman lapses into daydreaming), it has the serious disadvantage that it is apt to block the reception of impulses and messages coming from the center. This is why so many dreams of civilized people are concerned with restoring this receptivity by attempting to correct the attitude of consciousness toward the unconscious center of Self.” 
1145
1146- Carl Jung, Man and his Symbols (1978)
1147
1148You need to stabilize, which means individuation. You find the missing pieces (you interact with people to become conscious of inner flaws) and you individuate a highly intuitive rational conception of reality to advance your soul’s life and become generally more competent at intelligence in the first place.
1149
1150What’s the regulating center of your soul? In actualized terms purely, it’s how you conceptualize (right now this instant - in eternity;- which is not a time but a reality). In potential terms, it’s something else entirely – and you have to figure it out for yourself.
1151
1152You are already using the dialectic (even in reading a sentence – i.e. there’s objective “external” percepts and you are generating thoughts). Really, when we say “external” we mean “estranged”. You are estranged (as though long-lost relatives) in relation to the other cells of god. This is an incredibly profound point, actually.
1153
1154Funnily enough, it’s actually exactly by “information hiding” that evolution occurs. We generate our dialectical strands from, strictly speaking, the most uninformed and overinflated “visions” (impressions) from the rest of the society and how it affects us over many different lives. The fact that you were born very little more than 10 years after this Carl Jung book could have had zero effect, as you could have never read the book release date and just assumed it was from the 1940s, 1960s or whenever. When we don’t know any better, we can simply default to accessing things under the aspect of eternity. Life surprises us because everyone’s working at cataclysmically different reference-frames.
1155
1156
1157
1158Concepts are completely independent from matter and spatial dimensions, which is what science entirely fails to understand. Concepts exist in the mind-space and are mutable with other concepts, giving life, via mind and the wavefunction collapse, to what would otherwise be nothing. The only way we get any form of matter is via minds interacting, in parallel, en masse, via a Singularity of singularities (monads) since if we have one mind there's no sufficient justification as to why we can't have as many as possible. That's simply it. It rationally holds, so it must be true. There are no other conceptual alternatives as rugged and hard-wearing and robust. To engage in building conceptual rational philosophical thoughts (parallellism and symmetry) is to elucidate on the absolute guaranteed necessitated form of reality. This is given by the proofs everywhere in your intuitive life that you can confidently assert and express yourself about other, lateral convictions which must be true. Cross-validation is an inherent property when parallellism turns into parallel symmetry. It comes baked in with the unit monad, and the mechanism for this is the infinite range of sinusoids, positive and negative, imaginary and real, which allow us to construct not just “linear” things but massively complex models.
1159
1160For another big mindfuck, consider that just like a music signal visualization the likes that you can find on youtube, your mental multidimensional map of sinusoids can also produce motion, just as video is the natural parallel representation of image, and just as music is the natural parallel representation of either simple synthesized high-pitched noises or a single orchestra instrument overlaid solo. This is a given because, as we would note from other domains of mathematics, parallellism breeds parallel qualities and math is an inherently constant, shifting motion. Hence, we can think more akin to a jellyfish with a brilliantly vibrantly, aggressively, fast and viciously moving “skirt”. “Skirting around the issue” is when people dodge the question or act evasively as if to escape having to deal with something. Skirting around life would be to dance around the parameters of life without actually hitting or coming across anything in your way. It’s only high concept that affords these thoughts. Where and how do you think they are being mathematically compounded and pulsed? Do they sit as static, stubborn unmovable blocks in Sinusoid Land? No, they patently don’t. Math is movement, so we would get something more akin to kaleidoscopes. You can sometimes glimpse extremely abstract art in hypnagogia. It can have conceptual, analytical, yet distinctly visual qualities to it. You can see the nature and pattern of holographic stickers being reflected and merged with properties like Retrowave’s visual aesthetics, and the strange colour bleeding effects from CRT monitor filtering effects. The mind can impress deep onto its own inner contents what it encounters each life (if it didn’t, we wouldn’t be able to evolve so fast). This means that the mind generalizes (as in the case of hearing dogs barking over each other crisply in your hypnagogia); it also means that the mind puts our mental contents to use and reformulates the best of them no matter what we present to the unconscious mind. This is taken to be the meaning in having an open mind; being curious and pulling from multiple sources. ENFPs can have wonderfully “pure” minds compared to INTJs and it’s as though a lot of things from “our world” don’t affect them. This makes it pleasurable to talk to certain ENFPs particularly if they’re highly intuitive. It’s like a walk in the park where you can show some competency without anyone clashing with you. You can emotionally connect and share things and exchange curiosities. ENFPs can be multidisciplinary. They don’t typically stop searching for new sources of information in library books, websites and the like. Filters maketh man. Check your blinders! Have you got those horse blinders on over your eyes? (They are like eye patches but for horses, used to minimize the stress to horses as they parade through public streets).
1161
1162
1163
1164If you think about it, consciousness in the most thorough sense is the only way we'd ever be able to bring justice to bear on the world (authentically, properly and consistently-reliably). That's what the angels have in store for us, if we're growing up on Earth unconscious of why we can't just "force" some kind of friendly or peaceful existence on Earth by an indirect, unconscious, non-well-defined means. New World Order actualizations are only ever possible when rationally, consciously understood and committed. There was no other answer, and we are seeing the solution unfolding generally-speaking as fast as possible. The angels and the most conscious minds work as hard as they can, but not overreaching or destructively, to achieve those abstract aims for everyone as soon as possible. It is a given, built into ontological mathematical existence actually, that this will always be the case. It's simply hidden from humans and animals by our own lack of hyper-consciousness. The Illuminati on each planet are given the contingent conceptual tooling where necessary to shape out this kind of contingent environment so that minds evolve faster. The angels and gods are committed to making everyone align with the best general outcome of all; the fairest but also the most appropriate; the one which reflects Plato's Form of the Good, and the PSR. You have to be a breathtaking parallel thinker to understand further than this.
1165
1166
1167
1168In the new dialectical strands, every other soul works on updated dialectical data. (Think of Ocasio-Cortez's life). This means that as all the monads of one planet contribute and commit their actions to the shared space, we change how each other monad thinks. This is possible when you consider free will and consciousness, and bring them into the fold (how the best intellectual content affects us). What results is a type of existence where other souls will continue to work alongside us. We are never alone. We are always part of the world and its bubbling activity.
1169
1170Phenomena and sentimentality and mythos and fleshy bodies help define life. They help us appreciate more meaning. Angels don't need this, as they Conceive of reality completely rather than Perceiving in any mainstay. To an angel, public life and schema is just a mathematical mask for zero-dimensional sinusoidal wavefunction collapses. To humans, faces and visuals and settings and spooky psychological anticipations are part of the appeal of life. The more mathematical your mind gets, the more highly intuitive you become, the more free you are from the lower self and its anxieties, its paranoia, its condition.
1171
1172
1173
1174If everything was "pattern", then there would be nothing to differentiate it. If everything was "oneness", then again we are beset by a problem of lack of well-defined causation. If everything was "matter", then similarly there is nothing to derive, divide, shape or curtail the different aspects, dimensions and apertures of these things that existence were made of. Causation cannot be random. Causation cannot be the result of an indeterminable, indeterministic wavefunction collapse. You can't have a form of spacetime causation on spacetime objects, because it couldn't do anything but trail along in space and time. Causation emphatically cannot originate from spacetime for precisely this reason. It cannot originate from one arbitrary point (like the centre of the universe), as this bears no meaning on anything and begs the special pleading which is insufficiently provided. Causation, if it can exist at all, must be something that happens everywhere - because it can't happen over certain regions or quadrants of space in different ontological ultimate forms (else we would have undefinable interactions with different borders in deep space). It follows that the only type of causation can be something which is irreducible in the dimensionality of the spatiotemporal domain i.e. it isn't "in" the spatiotemporal domain and it derives from something else: the background dependency of multilateral, monadic, Dual Aspect Monism causation given by a sufficient reason for each unit monad to exist (the PSR; the Principle of Sufficient Reason). Causation must then be something that happens for a unit monad - but if it happens for one, it can happen for all monads. And if it happens for all monads, it cannot be a choice because this would be an impossibly insufficiently reasonable constraint to visit upon existence. Monads absolutely cannot be influenced by other monads in a foundational way depending on something that cannot possibly be defined in advance, analytically. Such structures of ontological reality are not logically, rationally possible; neither can they ever be consistent and complete. It follows then, that the only type of causation which can exist is that monads must collapse their own wavefunctions continuously, (with some variance if some finish faster), in order to cause all the things which could then arise individually and uniquely from each monad (thus providing something to discuss in the first place, out of all things; a maximization of contingent actualized potential, which if dropped from the concept of ultimate existence -- life would be made worthless). The type of causation which produced these sentences must be the same type of causation which it is analytically possible to arrive at by any sufficiently conscious soul in the universe.
1175
1176The principal mindfuck thought we get is that everything, including even causation, has “formless” inherent properties (cannot be reduced to a number, or a set, ranging over specific things) and thus;- everything indeed must be formed and folded into one grand conception (the Riemennian Conception) which includes causation, the PSR, the unit monad, sinusoids, and all other basis principles of ontological mathematics. This is all because what is irreducible in part must be irreducible all the way up the conceptual chain (hey-ho!) and as a natural result of this, anything which is conceptual (has conceptual contents), is itself irreducible to higher and higher conceptions! Isn’t that wondrous? Isn’t that divine? The final thought in this schema; the final conception; is the one that is actually both so conceptually broad and so specific at the same time (so massively multidimensionally parallel and symmetrical in the basis general sense but not necessarily a generally perfect god thought over the whole entire monad; it only has to be fundamental remember like a first Viking invention of a boat can cross the high seas due to mathematical full Riemennial reflection) that you don’t actually have a practical need for it most of the time. This is because we of course can 1) conceptualize about the whole truth of all the principal structure of existence, while also 2) not necessarily needing to meet this structural foundation as a personal goal right now – because our goal is to become maximally conscious, that is, generally adaptable, not in the way of seeking through and pure highest conceptual knowledge with no other possible endpoints of utility outcropping down from it! That would be a Limiting Function! The great answer to existence emphatically and categorically must be the parallel expansion of mind, which is an abstract dialectical “widening of the circle” type of function, where a circle reference space is being deliberately implied in so as to act via specific, parallel means. By definition, we never get anywhere in all particulars by referencing one mathematical expression in particular in itself (one thought). We “dialectically” get places because the dialectic is simply a natural parallellized symmetry-producing property of inflexion/reflection within the monad’s parallel thinking space (its parallel thinking map, terrain and web, of infinite sinusoidal “dimensions”). The mind isn’t acting anywhere but in the “reading between the lines” and “dovetailing between the lines” sense. Remember that basis mind can never enter the page or press upon the page, precisely because – as with our bodies – we are here, there and everywhere that’s not “there” (like in the eyes or the hands) for the principal capacity for us to be everywhere. “God is everywhere”! We are, by definition, simply and only allowed to construct strictly descriptive sentences and messages for which and by which the monad reacts (reflects). Consider that you can only have a “true reflection”, not a reflection magicked otherwise out of a non-specified domain (like empirical science’s wavefunction collapse and its “randomness”). All mind is acting on the absolute space, therefore it has background dependency which must be “curved” onto the page, and this must only be in mass parallel and facilitated across an array of infinite sinusoids, in parallel, at all times, necessarily and categorically. There is patently and principally no other possible means for existence. Existence must be based on infinite circles and (thereby) the abstract, relational and inter-relational parallel properties that can be expressed in particular patterns and with and by (through) analogous references to circles and circular volumes of space and definition (substance!). Mind definitionally can strictly and exclusively only operate in parallel and in this way. Either both aspects all come, or neither of them come. The reason why existence has to be this principally simple (in detail) is that all monads must be able to consciously reach a point where they can conceptualize clearly enough (The Riemann Conception) to encapsulate all of basis existence, and without reaching the full principal extents or “static special arbitrary mind state definition” akin like that of a god soul. Gods, by extension here, must categorically know this to be true, because the only alternative is that they would have to help us in the case that existential ontological life is actually much harder than this to “fabricate for”. Ontological life is conceptually “hard” but not perceptually hard. Angels and gods fill in all the parallel detail within the circle (as the model concept of parallellism), but they don’t principally have to worry about us glimpsing the truth, because that must be conceptually “blindingly” obvious!
1177
1178When writing, the left brain provides the conceptually opening constructs and words and buildups, and the right brain delivers the conceptually closing-down megastructures. This is a dialectical approach, and it best functions when best reflecting the strongest bicameralism where bicameralism has been individuated (parallellized). The bicameral functionality is yet another “god factor” to be pulled fundamentally into the god equation. The Riemennian Conception is the foundational ontological conception, which is distinctly different to that which must provide full psychological “detail attention” to the mind’s psyche, health and wellbeing. (Because concept precedes percept).
1179
1180
1181Thesis: shifty bicameralism (the bad god; cruel Master; Sleep Paralysis and schizophrenia; submission and fear)
1182
1183Antithesis: no bicameralism (the left brain, the initial Apollonian self, philosophy, the beginnings of autonomy; independence and hope)
1184
1185Synthesis: full god (interpenetration; interoperability; full “allegiance” and consciousness of both domains; high left brain and high right brain qualities developed within you; mythos-logos interlinking; intuition and reasoning)
1186
1187
1188Feminism is at the antithesis stage in this schema.
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193Minds think conceptual thoughts - and that's exactly why conceptual existence must precede everything. It's the conceptualization which encapsulates Mind's use of concepts with its own agency (the individual wavefunction collapse, committing its results as the collective wavefunction collapse) and allows mind and life to function. Eternally this must be true and must be happening;- and there must not be any other possible process to ever occur at any time, place or any eternal configuration. The PSR specifically excludes any other possible type of reality. Only this type of reality is ever possible to achieve anything. And it does exist: we are the obvious proof of that. We don't exist in spacetime but spacetime is a mathematical tool used to project contingent contents within conceptual tooling (conceptualization). Mind is conceptual and thinks conceptual thoughts.
1194
1195If you don't know what conceptualization is, you can try computer programming which is the sensory types' version of high intuition.
1196
1197
1198
1199Everything of percept (clothing, the body, the objects of life) has a purpose. Higher rational conceptualization means that each percept gets its highest nature elevated quickest and in the most streamlined fashion. This is why competent work can make us feel so good about ourselves, and why the Id, the pleasure principle, results in a completely antithetical projection about the purpose of life. Cynicism and depression are mathematical configurational poles that oppose actualized potential. As we would expect, the soul is distressed at its own loss of power being actualized, and that's simply analytically what it is. Einstein and Tesla and Nietzsche and Camus were poor conceptualizers of the angel psyche and Illuminism, which is the chief reason for their depression. When we project mental contents such as the expected grace of other souls, and when they don't reciprocate, disappointment results -- unless we can conceptualize what we are perceiving and conceiving with a better clearer wrapper function. Note that all of this is given by the ontological mathematics of thought (as you can prove and test yourself that you can hold thoughts about thoughts, divided from the capacity of it being ever-present in a linear, infinitely regressional chain like a "flat" universe would have to be according to science).
1200
1201How do we reconstruct or hold individual thoughts long-term? We definitionally don't. We keep the conceptualizations that serve our current condition of mind well (the Selector Function is the example given in The God Series) and we are prompted by percepts that arise from the external monadic community as shelved and rotated by their thoughts. Consciousness is the independence and freedom from this level, extent and scope of other multilateral thinking monads. You have to have the grandest conceptional clout to be a god, because of the range of noumena (the conceptual range!) that it must cover. No amount of additional range of phenomena could somehow stop you becoming god. Godhood is strictly a reachable, conceptual destination built into ontological mathematical existence along with the complete set of eternal pristine sinusoids.
1202
1203
1204
1205If you could hold thoughts aside to yourself all the way through existence, there would be no sufficient reason why you could do this and not anything more. There would be no conception (given here; conceptualized this way) of how you would drop the thought, or how you would indeed even need to. The only alternative that makes sense is that existence is fully accountable and that thought proceeds in a way and fashion consistent to all minds (it must have ontological form). That form must be the unit monad, and the PSR necessitates that we use sinusoids of all possible frequencies to achieve this. What does the word "possible" reveal here when scrutinized to reduce things further?
1206
1207"A designer knows he has achieved perfection not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery
1208
1209You don't hold onto thoughts, which is exactly an equivalent statement to this: you organize the thoughts that you want to keep visiting, by the conceptualization you style as a monad.
1210
1211
1212
1213"[Eva:] But I think she wanted you of all people to know the truth. She wanted to live on in your memory, not as a solider, but as a woman. But she was forbidden to tell you herself. And that's why she told me. Snake, history will ever know what she did. No one will ever learn the truth. Her story... her debriefing, will endure only in your heart. Everything she did, she did for her country. She sacrificed her life and honor for her native land. She was a real hero. She was a true patriot."
1214
1215    Metal Gear Solid 3
1216
1217The soul wants contingent things, and where souls are cut off from embodied life, the rest of us won't endeavour any more to satisfy their wishes, but we will continue of course the objectively preferable goals and conceptual ambitions which we are drawn towards anyway. No amount of closure would help this, and no amount of appeasing the dead or the vulnerable is actually needed anyway. In this sense, we do live in the best of all possible worlds.
1218
1219In life we never get enough full closure to settle or satisfy our inner desires and unmet needs and griefs -- this is, on the other side of the equation, fulfilled and provisioned by the supersymmetry search. That is the only possible way that existence could be. We couldn't have perfection by any other means. This is an eternal, necessary, immutable truth. In exchange for your grief, an angel understands you. There is always an answer and an explanation for everything. This is a type of reality where we are all always winning collectively as time goes on, because of the more rational power in the souls of the universe. We literally can’t possibly collapse a universally worse wavefunction, and so in the most universal sense, all we would have to do is wait until things get better. This view however has dialectical push factors to it: it’s way too slow and moronic a solution; so the dialectic (souls that get bored) always push higher and further to completion. We have nothing else to do now. We are on our “victory laps”.
1220
1221“A victory lap (also lap of honor) is a term used in motorsports to describe an extra lap of the race track after the conclusion of a race. This lap, driven at reduced speed, allows the winning driver to celebrate their victory and gives the spectators an opportunity to congratulate and honor the competitors. Commonly, trackside flag marshals will wave their flags in a gesture known as the FIA salute or the Monkey Dance in the US.[citation needed] It is not uncommon for marshals to clap or wave their hands at drivers as a gesture and sometimes the drivers wave back in response.”
1222
1223- Wikipedia
1224
1225Need we remind ourselves that it’s the right brain which pulls up these beautiful, colourful illustrations (connections and associations; analogs). The right brain understands the essential holism, and so it consults Wikipedia (left brain sensory thinking types’ conceptual fill-in detail) to furnish what it gleefully knows is a contingent solution. This works off the most vaguest of distant childhood memories in this case (these are analytical; all memories are analytical which is how we can access them in due contextual validity and by due sufficient cause).
1226
1227
1228Figures of speech are right brained (holistic; conceptually completing) while logic, exposition and explanation (conceptual unpacking) are left brained.
1229
1230The more developed your intuition, the more you can differentiate between specific things in a tight domain, i.e. the more conceptually clearly you can conceptually model knowledge domains. This is uniting the capability to generalize and to specify at the same time. This type of thinking is only possible in a universe expressed through an infinite range of sinusoids (frequencies) rather than a “flat” universe of no background dependency and running on pure “thin” spacetime percepts built in local matter only.
1231
1232It’s by qualifying our sentences properly (as if to be autistically conceptually “clean” and a clean freak about how we think) that we can expound and build superstructures with well-qualified sentences. If you think but don’t write, then this changes you. When I was 16 I knew acutely that writing and reading could ruin my thinking purity, so I avoided certain things as much as possible. I focused on intuiting. A lot of people write but aren’t philosophers. They are expressing themselves because it comes with their conception of life. They are conceptually going after something else. The height and apex of where mind reaches is conceptually defined (it has nothing to do with spacetime extensionality, extroversion, being visible in any way). This is one of the ways the Old World Order is completely fucked. It works in a universal form sense;- minds are not visible when they are becoming god; Simon Magus became akin to an angel while he was walking around in a definitive Earth local society exactly like us. With a real human body. Perception is conception, and that’s all the difference. Seeing is conceiving – usually we would associate “intuiting” with “seeing”, but not “looking”. Of course, that much happened naturally and unconsciously because unconsciously we all knew (a little towards it) that “seeing” must mean “conceiving”. Appearances inform the conception, and thinking about thinking is where the whole wrapper of conception contemplates itself. Your soul doesn’t have eyes; it is conception itself (to cater for all generalities of case: blindness, OBEs, lucid dreaming, divine future, etc).
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238Have you ever had that annoying problem where, as soon as you even think of a movie from years ago you’d like to watch – all the photographic memories of the scenes and plot come flooding in? It totally ruins the ability to enjoy these things. Angels have exactly this kind of problem where everything “triggers” them and automatically, unconsciously conceptually completes. Premature thinkjackers. This is how it’s possible to figure out or “shape up” someone or “sniff them out” via several pieces of information but no physical meeting. Conception of superstructures just inherently has the contingent distinction that allows it to pick up contents and manipulate them quicker. Imagine if your mind was actually composed of infinite points and that these could all swarm around things to manipulate matter. An angel’s “swarm” would be massively more “clearly expressed” than yours. (It would be pristinely handled and in terms of how it would be deployed, this action would be well-defined; hint: reality is conceptual because we can picture conceptual mental contents like this in the Active Imagination). We can even rotate symbolically here again and we’ve got supernatural powers and the Chakra power system from Naruto. Naruto in this analog would be a highly intutitive individual who learned incredibly acute mental sinusoidal control, thus making his spinning spirit ball which cuts and shreds (it’s called the Rasengan).
1239
1240
1241“The Rasengan was created by Minato Namikaze, which he based on the Tailed Beast Ball. He spent three years creating the Rasengan, which he intended to be the highest form of shape transformation. Like many of Minato's jutsu, the Rasengan does not require hand seals to perform. Once it is formed, it also does not require any additional chakra to sustain it, which means that there is no definite limit to how long the Rasengan can be maintained. However, the Rasengan will dissipate if it collides with something, even if it's an unintended target. Though the Rasengan's shape is consistent from user to user, its size varies from only barely large enough to be noticeable to much larger than the user's hand. With greater experience with the Rasengan comes a larger size.” 
1242
1243- Wikia
1244
1245Guess why it doesn’t require hand seals!? - because it’s “passive” rather than “active”. It’s concept and conception rather than percept. Because of how the right brain Higher Self works, its irresistible habit to conceptually rotate things to dish divine hints just comes encoded with contingent thought reality.
1246
1247Mental concentration is pure and we need to expend all our most conscious efforts if we even want to lift ourselves off the ground in terms of individuation; most strikingly this is true of objective thinking and consciousness. A figure of speech goes, “I want to get my business off the ground”. It’s the soul which moves things (conception). Telekinesis is strictly a conceptual discipline.
1248
1249Naruto and the Kyuubi of course maps to the Ego/Self and the Shadow, or alternatively, the left brain spatiotemporal Self and the bicameral god of timeless frame-of-reference and culture (the inner Phoster or Archon). Naruto routinely has an inner dialogue with himself to confront the powers of his Shadow and gain control over them, but in the story’s world this is also a powerful battle creature in its own objective right. The need for drama is provisioned by this Shadow battle beast having the secret ideal means for Naruto to achieve other (plot/story) objectives (it takes out enemies for him), and that’s how we engage and explore and discover the inner conceptual elements of the psyche interaction that’s on offer. That’s the narrative excuse we have given ourselves (which is broad band conception, not left brained logical construction). Doesn’t this sound familiar? It’s actually how we weave dreams, and we are tracing over consciously the rationales and the little bits of conceptual detail for how and why this must emerge (we are visiting the conception).
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255There can be no sufficient reason why any one thing should go a certain perfect way and not others. Supersymmetry will allow everyone to have an increasingly perfect life within the same wavefunction collapses as we advance over the centuries. That's exactly what the angels are "happy" about. That's exactly the angels' disposition when it comes to the ancient stories of relationships (which reflect mathematical information patterns between pairs of unit monads).
1256
1257As ever, it takes a human to organically shovel the story in a human way; an angel could never do a human's job. There is no sufficient reason or provision for this.
1258
1259
1260
1261Illuminism, or ontological mathematics, is a theory of supersymmetry.
1262
1263
1264
1265Minds can think in parallel about percepts, but that doesn't mean you can achieve thoughts incommesurably smarter than you currently are. With good infinity as in the understanding of Zeno's paradox, the coherent corresponding infinitudinal slices of mental commits would still necessarily have to exist in-between. A mind cannot hold or possess within its agency the means to conceptually or effectively understand a thought "above its weight" [taken from "you're punching above your weight"]. This is what science categorically breaches reason on. Science insists that thoughts and mind, theoretically, when taken from brains and AIs of increasing complexity, could be held and used by human minds. For lab brains or AIs to become intelligent, they would have to undergo the sufficient dialectical "conditioning", which as we know from reasoning about ontological mathematics, must fit into ontological reality and the Singularity itself. (All we are allowed to "play with" in thought on the form and structure of reality, is the inescapably immutably eternal and binding). Since this isn't happening with contingent ontological content (lab brains and computer AI), and since computer AI doesn't have anywhere near the bandwidth of spatiotemporal activity with spacetime phenomena, let alone the full range of sinusoids, artificial intelligence simply will never come about. Human intelligence outstrips and viable tracing and outpour of any matter-based "intelligence" project, since it requires the major friction of manual upkeep and maintenance and guidance and direction.
1266
1267So-called Artificial Intelligence is literally the execution of monadic thought that you have to fully specify yourself via form, conceptualization and conceptual tooling. Since nobody has the mind power or the time to achieve this in any computer system with the current Earth configuration of human resource output (and manpower / human resources), we will never get any meaningful computer AI which has super generalized use. This is a conceptual proof. There is no empirical test for it, because the conceptual configuration of a conceptualization is not accessible to general-take, ad-hoc, no-background-dependency questioning and queries. If angels appeared to scientists on Earth, the scientists' thoughts would be so poorly formed that humanity would conclude that angels were not understandable. This would be despite the angels being able to translate everything into our human everyday language. It would be a profoundly odd, standoffish psychological relationship between lower humanity and angels. Politicians wouldn't know what to do, and they would confusedly act to take control of the situation, going by their own Shadow and their being intimidated. Either that or humanity would be completely submissive towards the angels. Angels, being divinely graceful and rational, simply have no interest in such a scenario because frankly, they are beyond that. They see it as a suboptimal outcome for Earth denizens. They know, in other words, the rational conceptual utility and value of such a thing (despite never sensing it or needing to see how its branches of outcomes would pan out).
1268
1269The principal way to make a lab brain "work" would be to hook it up to an actual body and a family, so that a competent soul would intentionally incarnate into it, rather than it being instinctively grabbed by a less capable soul. That being said, modern science is so woefully out of touch with how to orchestrate rationally healthy governmental projects that this would never convceivably come about. Science and the Old World Order are far too endarkened to figure it out. There is simply no "audience" for this. It is a dialectical corner-case that never gets visited. Observe and know that we can conceptualize about contingent things that can never happen and for which there will as such never be any possible empirical test. You can't test the possibility of concepts or conceptual outcomes. That's for the same reason, the equivalent reason of sorts, as this: scientists are stuck at the level of empirical afterthought of the wavefunction collapse and its outputs.
1270
1271Probability theory is bunk, and it's the most laughable thing of all from science. If you flip a coin 100 times, there's no account in the statistics for whether someone will come and snatch it or ask you why you're doing it - yet scientists will tell you there’s a pre-ordained “probability” of how the coin will flip each time. The other outcome would only be factored in if someone forwarded that possibility. That sums up the weakness, the horror and the poverty of imagination in empirical science.
1272
1273Probability and “randomness” of course comes from the disparity of choice “fuzziness” grades between crystal-clear thinkers (angels), human monads, and the souls that fill in the last conceptual innermost details of the wavefunction of spacetime continuously. We are hanging on the coattails of angels, and plants and insects are slower to commit to the objective wavefunction than we are. Souls are all fighting to inject into the wavefunction, and to reincarnate. There is no probability that is not conceptual and given by an individual unit monad’s choices. Probability is in the realms of Percept, which is the flipside of conception. You don’t generate mind with “random probability”; that’s a laughable position. Mind must be clearly analytically defined. It must amount to clean foundation and it must produce clean thoughts.
1274
1275
1276
1277"Although this hypothesis, the so-called quasi-ergodic hypothesis, is very plausible, its rigorous proof presents great difficulties. The mathematicians von Neumann and Birkhoff have (1932) proved a theorem which is virtually equivalent to the quasi-ergodic theorem. According to the latest ideas in theoretical physics, it is true, the problem of a rigorous proof of the ergodic hypothesis has become unimportant, inasmuch as it is now meaningless, as will be explained later, to give information about the exact position of the individual molecules. To repeat: the hypothesis asserts that even when the initial state is arbitrary a stationary state is in time attained, owing to the collisions of the molecules with one another and with the wall, and that this state is the same as the state of greatest probability as defined above. It is assumed that the walls of the box are 'rough', so that they do not act as perfect reflectors." - Max Born
1278
1279Scientists being sensory thinking types were meant to provision these frameworks on God Game Planets, as though this was all storyboarded in rough by the angels. If we consider that all is math and all is mathematical configuration, then the only resources we could have ever been left with in all order of things, is the types of souls in their distributions (to organize) that typically reincarnate on God Game Planets like ours; and this is considered by the angels to be a suitable challenge to be levelled on the Illuminati. However angels are above such cheapness and premature of thoughts!- And they have considered not a direct "particle point" contingency but a rolling, "wave" type contigency (something that flows along and across spacetime and condition of such institutions and world soul states), and in here it's found that we are talking about a becoming type of responsibility over which the angels have seen fit to preside. The key to thinking like this is in the mere presence and ontological existence of angels. You have to scrutinize to collapse and investigate every niggling nag, or by contrast and more often than not, the ones that haunt you the most. Some souls are very passionate; some souls are highly intuitive; some souls are very curious; we are all these dimensions and facets in very different ways, expressed by our soul contents. Some of our patterns of thought are encoded in our "soul DNA". You may have grown up with the deeply unconscious intuitive sentiment that the world is deliberately "hiding" information from you, for example. Intuitive souls impose their own grand schemas of character upon the world. Alma Deutscher's vividly detailed imaginary friends from imaginary worlds give weight to this speculation.
1280
1281"I've got many close friends, but there's an awful lot about friendship that is not demonstrative in my case." - Warren Christopher
1282
1283The soul seeks symmetry and it will get exactly that in due course. We will be able to rearrange and reorganize and coordinate society, to have society reflect the most highly intuitive souls and their gifts for us all, crafted from highly contented happiness and other such magical notions. Society will be profoundly changed forever. That is the grand task which is worth fighting for, since it can be realized. Finally we will be able to take a break! Or will we need to anymore? What is it like for angels? As you individuate, you require less and less from others. The idealized type of world, the one we used to idealize individually, is not the world we are going to create. It is something much grander and better than our individual monadic projections could ever have conceived. That, we will learn, is the purpose of the shared domain.
1284
1285"So it's a much more difficult issue to organize around, because you can't get media at all to make your case. And that's where cases tend to be made politically." - Robert McChesney
1286
1287Society organizes around concepts, not arbitrary ill-defined wishes. You cannot ontologically promote anything into significance by mystical magic or sheer will, or emotional appeal, over established concepts, precisely because the ontological foundation has already been provided for you and is incommensurate otherwise: you have to intelligibly analytically find the concepts and the mathematical formulations and variables you want to actualize. This, as Leibniz understood so clearly, is the best type of conceivable world in the most general, abstract (conceptual) possible sense. He wasn't talking about a lack of evil or a locus of control, but the most conceptually clean and complete type of reality, such that everything actually made perfect sense in the end. That was the beauty of the conception. That eternally is the beauty of the PSR. It has a profound beauty which is individually reached by the unit monads.
1288
1289"I knew that I could be more creative onstage, to state my own case and deliver my own interpretation of the role much more aggressively than in the recording studio." - Kiri Te Kanawa
1290
1291Creativity is profound and is one of the greatest civilian human acts. Society should practically worship its own creative potential bouncing-off-one-another, and it will one day but this isn't possible right now.
1292
1293"We were disliked by the press in the early days because they couldn't put their finger on us, and that was the case with Zeppelin as well." - Freddie Mercury
1294
1295Everything is math, everything is dialectically striving. Everything is alive. Everything has conceptual existence and conceptual integrity. Concepts predominate and are viral and transmissible. Percepts aren't. Concepts are adaptable, capable, intelligible, traceable, seekable, derivable, challengeable, comparable, mutable, transactional. Percepts aren't any of those, except perhaps comparable, which requires conceptual modelling to precede it. Concepts predominate life and society precisely because existence is conceptual. More concepts and more-inflexional concepts dominate life underneath the surface and in the invisible veil of noumena precisely because concepts are so naturally-occurring to existence, in that as soon as sinusoids are combined, we come out with mathematical concept and conceptualization. Concepts then generate percepts by virtue and nature of the absolute mixing with the spatiotemporal domain. You know how to open a food packet or use a knife and fork, so you can figure out the details for yourself in the specific spatiotemporal circumstances you're "qualified" to know. This is infact none other than how dreams work. Dreams reflect our unconscious' collected skillsets and talents. That's why people do things in lucid dreams that they've gained noumenal knowledge of through waking lives. You couldn't make it up.
1296
1297"Even a total and universal disarmament does not guarantee the maintenance of peace." - Ludwig Quidde
1298
1299Concepts are beholden to concepts - but this coalesces and converges at the PSR, because reality does have background dependency. Since existence is ordered in superiority by concepts, it stands to reason that we can formulate contingent concepts within existence by navigating concepts. We navigate via and through concepts. We speak mathematical conceptual language (just a primitive one). We engage and transmit conceptual mathematical acts. All these conceptual formulations are, at all times, beholden to conceptual forces such as we consider them and recognize them. It requires consciousness of the mental, social and political environment to be able to do this fluently. The souls which make mistakes and flops haven't had the opportunity or the mental acuity to conceptualize to bring together all the relevant variables and conditions which govern existence.
1300
1301What supersymmetry implies is that every act and event in your life could be, in this conception, rearranged in terms of the ordering in time that you visited them; the significances they then would hold in your life; as well the people and experiences and media percepts that you met. This means we will, as gods, be able to reconfigure life exactly as we like it.
1302
1303What’s the thing about evidence? Evidence allows us to confirm some dialectical strand, some hit point, which is broadcast in what it now newly reflects to all knowledge to the rest of the monad (it has been generalized), giving us a new viewpoint from which to “analytically know” (give or bestow confidence) that we can now replicate the generalized achievement (the general “use-case” of the concept, to take a term from software) of a certain such colour due by the percept (really, our interaction with it). We can now replicate the achievement template over all the other such objects of the evidence’s type (this is because the new form of the evidence has now been derived; arrived-at; glimpsed/grasped; the conception of the evidence has changed and been transformed). Percepts inform; generalization conceptualizes and bakes the resultant knowledge into the monad, folding it (the evidence) into a transcendental process. The evidence, and the previous use-case, have been transcended. We have transcended (as if to say; we have escaped over the heads of) the old use-case and the evidence of the old context (the old conception). This is what it means when we say we have learned something is not good enough; or something is not what we thought it was; or that we’ve figured out how to do something now. The arriving at the process was itself a conception, and it inwardly transformed itself or supercharged itself in a way that was not linear but interpenetrative (i.e. across a full sinusoidal web, and also in the initial phase of this process [the evidence being realized] we factor in other monads’ percept-outputs, i.e. it includes the wavefunction collapse’s objective wavefunction contents to work on).
1304
1305Someone made the statement that certain individuals could exist who were uninfluenced, unadulterated and “pure” from the modern world – uncorrupted – i.e. do these people exist. There is a conceptual layer where you indicate something. Then, beneath that, there is the layer where we have to ask – well, what did you actually mean? Where within this does the thing vary? What are you describing? (Where’s the conceptual detail to chew on?). That’s such a generic thing to try to follow. Yes, people exist unaffected by mainstream society in a most general sense over the heads of a general stretch of people from different demographics from society; some of these groups of people in parallel selections here are avoiding the mainstream media; some are deep introverted writers; some are music teachers; some are avoiding maximizing their friendship circles; some are socially underdeveloped; some are focusing all on themselves; some are deeply entranced fanfiction authors and enthusiasts; some are engaged in writing letters in the post to one another and playing piano; some people have a beautiful curve of personality where they’re a piano player, lucid dreamer, choir singer, talented oil painter, synesthesia user and UFO hunter all rolled into one. People are affected in different straits, dimensions and parallels of observation. People are detailed. Define your questions; describe what you want to know. The future of the world must be “well-formed” and it must maximize the dialectical capacity. There is the essential quality of an Illuminated person here who fits this decision – but what does that actually tell us about a particular person under that selection? Not much. It doesn’t tell us everything we want to know. Resolving knowledge (answers) always must come dialectically i.e. it usually comes from the highest point of interest, not a wild tangenital shot of curiosity. In other words, we fundamentally and generally target ourselves (coordinate ourselves) towards what we generally should know and should learn. This is the process of consciousness; the process that consciousness seeks, and the process to surround consciousness and consciousness’ qualities. Someone uncorrupted from mainstream society may simply be a highly intuitive individual who never worked (as was Plato’s idea) and was always spending time thinking. But in all the processes of life, we have to encounter mainstream society to be maximally inflexional of all our dialectical ends (leaves) we’ve gained. In the case of encountering mainstream society in broad band, and politics – it’s actually not a case of avoiding it, but being sheltered from it until such a point where you can maximally rationally figure it out intuitively. You would then want to be able to face and confront all the issues of life (and the worst facts and understandings imaginable) with a solid grounding in intuitive reality. You’d want to overcome and supersede any kind of state and mode of tolerance of these normal ways around mind (ways to navigate thought; “ways of mind”). What we are talking about is individuation. What you’re seeking with this net you’ve cast here is general individuation; generalized supersymmetry in the monad. You don’t search for people of a particular soul signature (the angels aren’t doing that typically). You achieve leadership by individuating and becoming sharper yourself. You cast the mold.
1306
1307Better consciousness implies being/becoming conscious of the things others don’t know that you are ranging your expressions over. Intercept what will happen and calculate the result that you want. This is what Leibniz’s mind was starting to do via his unconscious.
1308
1309“Why do we need sleep?” – What are we actually asking? Define what you want to know specifically. This comes about dialectically from the initial curious thought. Are we talking about the right brain’s command over the body? Are we talking about people with sleep disorders? What would scientists say that it is (i.e. how would they frame it)? Does the biology have a definitive discernable quality in this? What about evolutionary biology, using Occam’s Razor (or however it would be best put to use)? Is it that the unconscious mind, the seat of the soul, hasn’t figured out how to connect to its spacetime brain well enough yet? And this in detail – what would this mean?
1310
1311 “Sleep researcher William Dement, who co-discovered REM sleep and is often described as the father of sleep medicine, told National Geographic that, ‘as far as I know, the only reason we need to sleep that is really, really solid is because we get sleepy.’ 
1312
1313…
1314
1315In a 2013 study, published in the journal Science, researchers found that cerebral spinal fluid is pushed around the brain to clear waste chemicals that are produced as part of a cell’s natural activity. This method of waste removal, known as the glymphatic system, mainly occurs when we sleep.
1316
1317"You can think of it like having a house party. You can either entertain the guests or clean up the house, but you can't really do both at the same time," lead researcher Dr Maiken Nedergaard told the BBC.”
1318
1319 - iflscience
1320
1321
1322You must fearlessly test yourself (your broad band conceptual intuition powers) by plunging yourself into new domains and seeing if you intuition “clicks right”. A god psyche has the mindset to simply relentlessly figure out all and know all, with no possible shame or fear about being exposed to the wrong content too early or too soon. This itself is a valuable fear in the mind of the young highly intuitive individual; but we can drop such things and we need to learn to drop them. Over-exposure to mainstream modern culture is one thing; but don’t let that now be a limiting factor (when sufficiently conscious) on the entire future of your eternal soul (your Soul Line). The key is in good selection, but we have to drab a bit of time over into the regions of bad cost/benefit, because we can’t afford the perfect encountering factor yet. “You get what you give”.
1323
1324How does a range of sinusoids ranging from negative to postitive infinity, and negative imaginary infinity to imaginary infinity, optimize itself? How does the optimization principle take hold, and how is it that it must apply when actually the individual soul units are not in absolute terms but in their own contingent terms? Math is absolute .. subjective .. 
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329Although we've said existence is ordered in superiority by concepts, that doesn't mean that monads are constrained foundationally. This is because all that is required for us to figure out reality and reflexively explore the PSR is our own thought. Our thoughts are completely independent from any notion of location or locality or reference; of the superiority of concepts (souls reset their contents to blank states at The Omega Point); of any notion of in-built contingent universal particularities. Note that this is a more easy thought to assume. It wouldn't be a Leibnizianly "clean" universe if some thoughts came preloaded into our minds. That isn't possible or accordant with the PSR. We live in a universe moreover, which must foundationally provide full and complete freedom to each unit monad. What that means is there can be no particular constraints on thought -- as long as it's contingent true pure thought of the full range of sinusoids which it definitionally is -- and that our agency is fully, authentically genuinely definitionally our own. This is infact what allows ontological mathematics in the first place to genuinely reflect itself accurately. If there were any mistake in the perfection of the collection of sinusoids for example, or any additional "rogue" conditions on thinking, then we wouldn't be able to become conscious in the most natural and rational way. All of existence would be trailed or coupled with some grand stinking obstruction to thought, life, mind or the procession of events. This simply cannot happen as as soon as it's conceivable as happening, it's eternally unchanging and this produces no interesting most variant type of universe. It violates the PSR and goes astray of it. The more clear, radical explanation here is that anything we can conceive in contingent terms is our own imperfect projection of what is absolute, eternal, necessary and a priori and wholly irreducible to contingent conceptual detail. What exists of contingent conceptual detail is, by definition, not candidate for ontological structure. Existence must be comprised purely of that which cannot be reduced to contingent conceptual constructions! And that is the answer to so many similar sister thoughts here. You cannot, after all, make reality out of something that's more complex than it itself can be. You cannot invent anything to add onto the PSR. You cannot make it. The PSR is exactly that which, eternally, exists and presides over reality for us to be able to project these word-phases, these subjectivity subterfuge suggestions of ideation and sentiment onto. In reality of course, though the PSR is akin to our thoughts themselves in being ultimate reality, the PSR does not have our subject-object internal monadic agency or agenda. That is why the PSR remains so "pure" compared to us.
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334What is the ultimate sandwich? Try this one: ciabatta panini bread, small green chilis with the ends cut off, mushrooms, mozzarella, pre-diced chorizo sausage. Take the inner ingredients except for the cheese and microwave 1m30s. Add with mozzarella in the bread, make sure it doesn't get wet, and microwave 1m30s further. Leave for a bit then enjoy while hot.
1335
1336
1337
1338We need more cultural outputs like "Will You Be My Neighbour" (trailer).
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343"Who wants a world in which the guarantee that we shall not die of starvation entails the risk of dying of boredom?" - Raoul Vaneigem
1344
1345Thrill comes within the fold of sinusoidal symmetry and supersymmetry; there is nothing to unfairly promote it otherwise. There is no sufficient reasoning enabling this. Thrill, and likewise death, are not somehow foundationally apart from the rest of life. The only thing that can exist as basis existence is the sinusoids and the monads and the thoughts, which are governed in form by the PSR. Basis existence lays the grounding, the backdrop and environment for life to occur and unfold in temporal, spatial, contingent terms. But life proceeds on and by absolutes (sinusoids; the basis concepts), and that's why the only true order and disorder which can exist is the symmetry and antisymmetry of sinusoidal content expressions. This is exactly why life has such variations in phenomena (appearance) and noumena (spirit; character). All which has to do with you and your life's details is going to be soon enough wrapped up into a mathematical supersymmetry vortex. All your ailments and all the world's scars will be healed. That is the religious, divine reach of consciousness and conscious life for highly intuitive minds.
1346
1347All thoughts come with agendas of conceptualization. The best agenda to have is the divine agenda; the logos agenda; the divine coloration and backdrop. The Illuminati are the principal divine human organization on each God Game Planet, expressing the utmost conscious effort and intrigue; the utmost divine competence. This carries what we might surmise to be the will of Abraxas; the veil of Abraxas and the carried condition of Abraxas; the force and momentum of Abraxas. All higher life planets carry this will and divine agency forward. All God Game Planets are cloaked in the veil of the god within, as administered perfectly by the angels, all over the universe. The angels are the galaxian caretakers; the cosmic caretakers. Gods preside over the angels and can conceptually communicate with them without ever using bodies. Angels act independently.
1348
1349
1350
1351    God Game Planets are dramatic scenarios designed by either ourselves or the gods/angels, depending on how you want to look at it.
1352
1353    this should be: "God Game Planets are dramatic scenarios coordinated by either ourselves or the gods/angels, depending on how you want to look at it. "
1354
1355
1356
1357Particulars are evident in the lives we live, and these are mathematically selected and thrown towards our vision by a combination of 1) mental conception levelled by our unit monads, and 2) the objective shared domain that we are interacting with. Does the objectivity come first? The concept operates on the percept and the Singularity of mind is primary, remember. Moreover, there is no sense or differentiation of numerical ordering, pronouncement, promotion, or spacetime in the eternal frequency domain of mind. Mind is zero-dimensional, so all this happens within the mental substrate. It is eternal, and it precedes all things like "sitting" or "happening" (which is a contingent concept revealing of and illuminating of how contingent sinusoidal contents, thoughts, arrange themselves).
1358
1359Particulars are visited upon the conceptual mind, and the conceptual mind works out conceptually how to collapse its selections into a result. This is given by the absolute mathematical presence of conceptual, sinusoidal mathematical selection criterias. Nothing else is required! Literally nothing else could either exist in between the infinitesimal spaces such as to provide events, causation and the like. There is no extra, striding-between, middleman process. Nothing could be presented there because it would have no involvement elsewhere in mind or ontology. All that's definitionally, conceptually required for minds to select new thoughts is the process and ontological structure by which minds are forced to generate something-thoughts. You forget, but minds don't actually have any filler or dust or particles whatsoever, so there's no perception-based projections you are likely to make that are ever valid. Mind has no such thing as whitespace on a blank empty page, or page margins or padding. There simply cannot be any conceptual provisions such things, as we've just outlined / ruled out.
1360
1361Particulars come with the expression of absolute mathematical sinusoidal expressions. Particulars take the form of the expressed thought, and this is delivered and leveraged and visited upon the spatiotemporal domain; the shared dream. We commit our actions by mathematically transposing and translating them in various mathematical language degrees; various vectors and second-hand, black-box variants. These are mathematical concepts, functions, and all the selective outcrops you'd expect from the different domains of life where percepts are prized out of the physical shape of the mathematical terrain in different ways. Insects evolve mathematical concepts for insect bodies with insect frames of spatial locality of reference (crabs walk sideways!) and minds select for bodies and circumstances which seem to surround them with greater opportunities at the least tidbits of mathematical petty advantage.
1362
1363When we locate a particular, it's by using a conceptual function which means a conceptual expression element. Even singular versus plural, is infact a type of selection and differentiation. It's just that this is conveyed using objective ontological sinusoids and their combinations, which is why we don't get all of this consciously. We aren't conscious mathematicians - but we do know the ways and routings and routes for how to reconstruct the information or noumena we need. The simple test of this is that you know how to get to work in the morning, but you can't ever mathematically describe how many footsteps you've taken or the series of interconnected junctures of directions. In zero-dimensional math, lies the capacity where we effortlessly grasp these collections of thought-statements; qualities and quantities; via collected intuitions and parallel thought. Zero-dimensional math has no particular requirements that bestride spacetime dimensionality, or conceptual domain restrictions -- which is exactly why we can mix and merge and meld concepts. It's why we can deliver flurries of figures-of-speech to flaunt and flex our master of vocabulary. This comes in handy when we're conveying highly intuitive concepts, placing down the gauntlet in record speed and tightness because the thoughts are flooding in too fast to do otherwise. Note that this is a type of dialecticalism and maximization. Reality is not background independent.
1364
1365Spatiotemporal particulars, like words in sentences, must come with a sufficient context for a monad to reliably retrace over them in a similar way. For insects and animals, the spacetime realm is where they are concerned about contingent survival of the body and the Self and the striving survival instinct is trying to kick in. The psyche, the soul, is building up structures to better serve its nature; and the only way it can do that is by continuing to encounter percepts and conceptually think about how they match up to the rest of life. Generalization and the maximization of outcomes must be essential to this process. It's what human monads are also doing. It's indeed what angel monads are doing (they use their angel lifetimes as a springboard to gnosis).
1366
1367What a twist it would be if the gods had it that every Illuminist on every God Game Planet got a single chance at being a phoster in the next life, but everyone had to wait their turn. Once again, gods simply cannot entertain such circumstances as it would mess up The God Game too much. Gods and angels are stoically, resolutely rational. You can't barter with them or influence them. That's what it means to be a Threshold Guardian. You act accordingly in view of the world around you. There isn't a choice, and that comes inbuilt with hyper rationality and hyper consciousness.
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372How is it that we feel good about some new meaning? The new act has greater potential and renewed value and purpose, since we unlocked some greater potential. In that is the meaning of progress, and also actualization's rewarding elation. We are elated by the new act's purpose and weight and significance. This is only possible due to our renewed objective assessment and estimation of what we've just integrated privately (or committed publically).
1373
1374
1375
1376    Once again, gods simply cannot entertain such circumstances as it would mess up The God Game too much.
1377
1378    (unless it can be done on a merited asis threshold, allowing us to prefer to asvance and gt over tha treshld by the nxtlie)
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384How are words selected? We connect via the right brain to the frequency domain, and the nonlocal aspects of existence open themselves up to us (we were already connected), and we think in terms of number and mathematical concept, relentlessly shifting furiously to find the right mathematical configuration of which word maps closest to the (shifting) meanings we are playing with; literally reaching for with our right brained unconscious mental processing. To connect more wouldn't really make sense; it is of course a case of how we connect, i.e. what frequencies we are tapping into and how precise this is to be achieved, and which conceptual goal or direction we take aim at in order to arrive at some (conceptually in-context) nearer destination. Frequency itself is free of a locus of threshold indicator -- this is furnished and provided by mind. If we falsely picture the spectrum of frequencies from minus infinity to negative infinity, with a spatial visual representation, then in this schema the mind is exactly that which never enters the picture because this tunnel is its whole domain. No individual frequency or designator or indicator (like a mouse cursor or a line with an arrow) could ever enter here insufficiently pronounced. By modulating and applying eternal frequency, we can arrive at particulars from concepts which are integral results we actually want to do something with i.e. commit them into spacetime as a muscular reflex. This marks all the difference between landing on a particular frequency which you are doing right now, and committing the actual frequency into your next spatiotemporal act. This is because mind can only actually make choices in whatever totally ontologically authentic way it wants to. There can be absolutely no interference. The only error is human error and biological error, both of which are eliminated for the highest most conscious human minds. The exception to this is ailments that don't come from birth and are in modern human social reference, "circumstantial".
1385
1386Percepts must be selected similarly, just like words. They come from no magical mystical realm, but fully-fleshed-out mathematical derivation under-the-hood. It's unconscious, but it's deliberate in the sense of strict, raw, hard mathematical clout that the mind uses. Note that there could be no such differentiation in the primary substance, between animal soul and Illuminist soul for example; since the soul has to cross from one to the other. Since there are no insurmountable walls in this capacity, no such mechanism or externality can exist. Nothing at all can exist outwith mind, the PSR and the universe. The reason why humans get so caught up in imagining and conceptualizing a purely conceptual universe, is that we tend to think in perceptual terms and we project and transpose these properties as if the universe ever needed anything with a body on top of the PSR and conceptual existence. In fact, since conceptual existence is the spring from which springs all such thoughts, it's definitionally empossible for this to be so. Mind, and the universe and existence, do not need the contingent words expressed to describe them, and they don't in the sense of strict contingent mind operation initially, need mind to be conscious. Existence mandates that mind will become conscious eventually, and this is a mathematical determination brought about by the irreducible quality of reasoning and mind and life. Stretching our thoughts at this range, we cannot say anything anymore because the PSR actually literally precludes us from doing so. If you think about it, when you become god there is literally nothing more you can discuss or learn. Conceptually, principally, the same would be true about contingent thoughts being constructed about where, in and of the structural integrity of existence, the conceptual endpoint would be. There is no endpoint because just like the wavefunction, conceptualization is wrap-around utilizing all the sinusoids of positive and negative numbers, and positive and negative imaginary numbers. Just as if we took a single number out of the number scale (impossible), either all of reality and the PSR comes all at once (and it's not an event), or none of it does. Since it's obviously here (or our analytical description and investigation is!), we can only conclude that it's all here, in eternity with us, in zero-dimensional mathematical structure and form. All that thought is is the exploration and thought of the structure of thought and what we can create with it. The properties of thought must be given by, not something external to thought (as if the PSR was floating outside your home or suspended at the bottom of a 600ft drop in a cave) but of the capacity of thought in its own right. Since thought must have these properties that thought is always producing all around us, this proves to us that thought, through and through, is being reflected many different ways. But it's all thought; it all has the same basis elemental quality and structure. None of this is somehow of a different ultimate nature. Every food you've tasted; every person you've touched; all this was mathematical thought, and mathematical thought comes in content and form and you are part of it. And you are becoming conscious of this.
1387
1388
1389
1390The problem of trying to locate the universe is enshrined in the fact that you are thought; you are the universe; and so what you are investigating is yourself, and contingent thoughts can only describe contingent aspects of existence or analytical structure and nature of reality (which is conceptual, analytical and never perceptual). If you are looking to perceive something about ultimate reality then you will always be disappointed;- until you realize that actually, what this rational PSR-type thinking provides, is the means that actually understanding the true language of ultimate reality (neocortex thinking and logos and math) allows you to coordinate and arrange all the divine experiences and concepts you ever wanted to. That's what we get from all this, ultimately, on Earth.
1391
1392Percepts come to animals because animals need percepts to navigate, coordinate and prosper. Humans need percepts to orient and pivot their lives, but most are unaware of the types and ranges of thinking we can grind down to in order to wield full control over the meta aspects of our thinking, our behaviour, our mindsets, our moods, and how these come about and how they're interrelated. You have to be highly introverted and highly intuitive to come up with such an idea.
1393
1394You come to conceptions as young and as fresh as you always have. You -- your soul and not your person -- are immortal. You are a mind, as analytically fresh and spotless as there ever was (as gods' are). There is nothing that is not mathematical that is preventing you from gnosis right now. Your only interaction towards gnosis lies within mathematical noise; mathematical uncertainties and unknowns; mathematical misapplications and misinsights. To think is to clear your mind, and that's essentially how you individuate and achieve prominent rationality to be able to intuit all about the angels and gods and how they must be. Predominantly, becoming highly rational involves combining thinking and intuition at the same time.
1395
1396We can have consciousness surrounding ourselves and our own behaviours with a view to others. This is what's called self-awareness. To dialectically evolve and individuate in this fashion, i.e. learning about what throws you about in life between circumstances, requires regular contact with friends and interesting people and romantic interests; prospective partners. It's with a full range (hey! Sinusoids!) that you are able to individuate spread across the broadest circumstances for the best fit, ranging across possible outcomes and scenarios. The ways we fill the cracks in our personality are by continuing to reinvent ourselves, adapt and change as best and bravest we can.
1397
1398Do you spread yourself thin? Where do you spread yourself thin, and where do you give your full attention? Who deserves your attention and more of it? Isn't it yourself? How will you be balanced otherwise; if you're giving your energy and attention to other people? This is the classic problem with people who look to others for external validation. Since you're not convinced you're good enough (as can be impressed through childhood experiences) you go on seeking and craving the support or praise or interest of others which simply mathematically doesn't fit you. The only cure is consciousness and self-awareness of this dimension and element of life. ("Luckily", the broad phase of life meets the general absolute mirroring of absolute pristine monadic contents via generic life advice embedded in the public society as its function at large, which is enough to dialectically springboard from).
1399
1400The other type of consciousness is meta thought; thinking about thinking. We trace the highly intuitive thoughts since the rest of life for us is boring and pale in comparison, not delivering any of the answers about major existence at large. This itself is a condition and an agenda at play (since it is not sufficiently impressioned by the PSR, it has that individual monad's origin, which is the same as to say, that monad thinks in that way at base conception or soul contents).
1401
1402The origin of social consciousness is developing and advancing on Earth and the most conscious of us are those who would be at home becoming Jungian therapists, able to elucidate and expound upon peoples' problems with the hints of a few pieces of information. Carl Jung was an incredibly highly intuitive human who had premonitions of World War 1;-
1403
1404"In October [1913], while I was alone on a journey, I was suddenly seized by an overpowering vision: I saw a monstrous flood covering all the northern and low-lying lands between the North Sea and the Alps. When it came up to Switzerland I saw that the mountains grew higher and higher to protect our country. I realized that a frightful catastrophe was in progress. I saw the mighty yellow waves, the floating rubble of civilization, and the drowned bodies of uncounted thousands. Then the whole sea turned to blood. This vision last about one hour. I was perplexed and nauseated, and ashamed of my weakness.
1405
1406"Two weeks passed; then the vision recurred, under the same conditions, even more vividly than before, and the blood was more emphasized. An inner voice spoke. "Look at it well; it is wholly real and it will be so. You cannot doubt it." That winter someone asked me what I thought were the political prospects of the world in the near future. I replied that I had no thoughts on the matter, but that I saw rivers of blood.
1407
1408"I asked myself whether these visions pointed to a revolution, but could not really imagine anything of the sort. And so I drew the conclusion that they had to do with me myself, and decided that I was menaced by a psychosis. The idea of war did not occur to me at all.
1409
1410"Soon afterward, in the spring and early summer of 1914, I had a thrice-repeated dream that in the middle of summer an Arctic cold wave descended and froze the land to ice. I saw, for example, the whole of Lorraine and its canals frozen and the entire region totally deserted by human beings. All living green things were killed by frost. This dream came in April and May, and for the last time in June, 1914.
1411
1412"In the third dream frightful cold had again descended from out of the cosmos. This dream, however, had an unexpected end. There stood a leaf-bearing tree, but without fruit (my tree of life, I thought), whose leaves had been transformed by the effects of the frost into sweet grapes full of healing juices. I plucked the grapes and gave them to a large, waiting crowd...
1413
1414"On August 1 the world war broke out. "
1415
1416    Carl Jung, "Memories, Dreams, Reflections" (1963)
1417
1418Carl Jung not only was highly intuitive enough to interpret dreams spectacularly well (combining left brain and right brain activity) but he was the first to invent this practice and put it forward for the world as a divine gift, in his book on dreams, called "Man and his Symbols" (1964). If you can't get the book, there are some audiobook readings on youtube.
1419
1420
1421
1422The world as it is seen by Phosters caters via Archons for every Dominant Extrovert need, such that they are inescapably weaved and intermeshed into higher rational Apollonian/Phoster life and lower humanity's life. Phosters acutely know that no too significant human suffering goes on as in the imagination of the paranoid and anomic; they know that for every human act there is involved consent and free choice in the only capacity that can be favoured by Abraxas (that irreducible quality; that only special pleading; the dialectical advance shared by everyone or the leading individuals; the Becoming). What this amounts to, infact, is that nobody of either an incredibly strong Will or Intellect can take issue with this arrangement. Every embodiment of human life, every person, is folded into a subject-object appreciation which on the one hand favours and selects towards the Id; the pleasure principle; extroverted thinking's dominance over the flesh and the individual (until its eyes go over another individual it wants), and on the other hand the Superego; the rational divine Higher Self; the rational advancement of the soul and the spirit; the deep introverted thinking and clarifying; the finding of oneself dialectically; the introverted intuition and the Active Imagination and the linking of mythos and logos; experience and rational intuition and schema. Souls either choose Will or Intellect for upgrading themselves (or both). Life becomes a race and a competition to pack as much development in as possible in as short a spacetime slot as possible.
1423
1424You will note that the change of a single word in a sentence is enough to transform the overall interpreted meaning, which executes as a wavefunction or a conception, under the mind's conceptualization act. One thing that this reveals is of course that words aren't reality; words are always a symbolic stand-in for something noumenal, mathematical and what is unconsciously intuitively grasped and the process therein.
1425
1426Human motifs exist for all threads of life; some souls are needily searching for comfort motifs in the media and content and percepts they find. All of life, pristine as it is, reflects conditionality and what has been done to it. The grand conceptual overhaul of the planet (Illuminism and the Illuminati) is the project which definitively restores justice to the divine kingdom of the world (and thus the Self).
1427
1428
1429
1430The grand takeaway about planetary life is that we all need the interdependencies of each other (or analytically if you like, the past experience with some analytical souls) in order to individuate. We are all in this together, just as in movies and stories there are archetypal character rivalries between will and intellect, along with the other key archetypal roles (The Mentor, The Antagonist, The Fallen Hero, the Oracle). Existence literally couldn't be configured in any other chief (conceptual) way. God Game Planets without souls of Will and Intellect would not be good enough for the younger souls to grow in. We would have to artificially exclude a lot of human-tier souls from life. They would just end up confused on planets exclusively of their own. The solution for this, if you are into mathematical balancing, is to manage multiple "farms" at once trailing from the lowest prominence of consciousness neatly to the ones of most prominence of consciousness, exactly as you might do analogously in certain video games which manage resources and strategy. This is what the angels and gods are doing in secret ("load balancing" is the computer networking term).
1431
1432
1433
1434Either that, or reincarnation's rational targeting is simply just built into existence itself, in which case it requires no essential load balancing. But keep in mind anyway, that Archons and Phosters keep tabs on everything at least on their own planet; it's their job to; and in this way they shape and coordinate the style and fashion by which souls are attracted to reincarnate into better families, cultures, circumstances and other form-factors like bodies. We can start to consider and investigate here what differentiates gods from angels!
1435
1436
1437
1438How does a mind select a thought from conception? Well - mind in human terms is always surrounded by percepts, and unlike angels, we are not necessarily conscious in our dreams or fully conscious of what we are doing. Human minds rely on percepts to guide them much akin to how dream anchors offer us the potential to become lucid. This is a crude painting of the human condition, but for our purposes it's useful as an analog. The human mind has its conceptions, and then it has its visual feed and its visual and nonlocal prominences of symbolic, or unconscious, bubbling thought. These percepts (also we would include feelings and intuitions, not just the senses) help inform the conceptual "condition" to be satisfied or engaged by the conceptual mind in the frequency domain. You know this sounds suspiciously true -- as the boundary between mind and matter is always an intimate marriage and a liminal space; an "event horizon" of sorts.
1439
1440Is this true? - That matter, being the natural outcrop of mind not existing outwith mind and thus mind's nature, is intimately tied in conception to mind; not that we know exactly what dead matter and "living matter" (trees; flesh) is intuitively, but that we know moreso than 99% of souls what circumstances and corners to expect in the mathematical terrain of conception; since our lives' advance is coupled with the advance of the same contingent structures as we see in the essential, predominant contingent sense. Do old souls intuitively have better conceptions, so the mind-matter interface is more complete by conceptional constitution? Is it telling that some people get very rowdy and irrationally uncontrollable very easily while drunk? What if all that was to do with psyche and the mortal person, and had far less leaning on the soul?
1441
1442You could get anxious over your computer bricking itself with a hardware fault every single day, but you don't, not when you become sufficiently conscious. A materialistic empiricistic analysis wouldn't find genes dialectically evolved for computer use, since obviously they haven't been here for long - and yet, mind is able to conceptually adapt the conception almost as though mind can generalize via absolute conceptual knowledge for any new scenario. Who would have known?- Minds can step up very suddenly in new domains of mathematical narrow-specialization (such as upgrading from one dinosaur body to a functionally distinctly more complex one, or from rat to something to bird or perhaps cycling around) with the only conditional requirement being the generalized universal knowledge of how to integrate mathematics in new more narrow, more specialized terms. This is indeed what your fingers, lungs and feet can do that for animal souls may be impossible.
1443
1444The mind learns new expressions it unlocks as it advances and ascends. But none of this is delivered by "scientific" evolution strictly of a spacetime and percepts only kind. That is not possible, since it's running against the determinism of Dual Aspect Monism terms by implying that we absolutely need percepts to step inbetween slices of mind motions from one state A to another mind state B. Going by Zeno's infinity paradox, there has to be indeed a mathematical interaction and wavefunction collapse between each possible slice between mind states A and B. Percepts have nothing to do with this though - for the simple reason being that they aren't needed and aren't specified anywhere in the conception of mind, free will, selection, conceptualization and thought. The only definitional, analytical absolute and necessary requirement of mind (vis a vis choice) is that it must select something and it can't select nothing - and of course, it can only try to select something better of its own accord. Percepts cannot help with this in an ontological form sense. Percepts have nothing to do with conception per se; conception in and of itself. The PSR doesn't need percepts. All minds ever have to do is keep going and keep expanding on their collected, integrated, conceptualized conceptions. By the order of this, eternal minds discover new mathematical inferences, insights and abilities (unconsciously).
1445
1446Remember, since all types of mathematical interconnection are always available, conception (selection) is always adaptable for it. This is why science can never figure out how a fish changed to a land crawler to a human eventually -- because there is no strictly biological evidence thread. Genes do not and cannot express the dialectical contents of noumenal mind. They can only express the side-effects and the provisional shedded skin of what mind has accomplished. Naturally, since we're in a dialectical race initially unconsciously towards god, we don't have the time or considerations to "show our work"! We infact can't care now. We can't afford to, because life's not a tedious game of giving empirical evidence that won't, conceptually, ever convince sensory thinking types. It's a conceptual difference, not an additive difference. No amount of eating cake makes you stop craving sugar, because that's a consciousness problem not a sensing (tasting) problem. Percepts are a consciousness problem, not a sensing problem. You become conscious that the percept exists; you don't become conscious via the percept somehow making you think. How would it? Abstraction? Abstraction towards what exactly? What exactly is the mechanism by which abstraction would work? What would it have to do with incredibly rough, arbitrary, particular arrayed formulations of percepts (imagine a really crappy abstract piece of art or a cliff face)?
1447
1448
1449
1450Animals like seagulls emphatically don't get sentience by looking at a rock face. That's laughable. At no point in their minds did they ever rely on the absolute infallibility of identifiable, sentiently available visuals and decide that these things helped them make sense of a coordination in three dimensional spacetime with no frequency domain; at no point was life reducible to spatiotemporal existence only. Life for a cat or a dog is much closer to colourblindness and a kind of drowsy acuity of mind; as though the visual and spatiotemporal (the local) aspect of existence doesn't even register that much as clearly as the frequency domain. (The signals are getting there, but the mind hasn't individuated the wavefunction or ironed it out enough). The resurgence of the unconscious frequency behaviours in animals and birds hints that this is what came first before even sentience.
1451
1452Percepts are what you get when you bring the mind's attention in the conceptual mind-space to something it must achieve. It's here where words start spinning out and where you get the unconscious blind swiping will to do something with the body. In terms of the monads that control the spacetime atoms, they can't help but produce the primordial essential frequencies just as we'd get from boiling some water. Their sleepiness is their indecision, which makes them fill in the tiniest gaps of the wavefunction as it collapses (these are the last souls, opposing the angels, to commit to the wavefunction, and thus they have little to no power being demonstrated, but it is there; it is a something given by the PSR for us more powerful souls in bodies).
1453
1454Percepts, or particulars, must be selected if the mind is going to generate matter or manipulate matter in some way. Principally this is just a given until we become god (where the condition or variable drops out of the equation), because either we influence matter "directly" or we coordinate in abstract via conscious goals derived of the conscious life of the day (the Ego).
1455
1456Percepts in a non-mind-matter-interface sense are generated as we inwardly experience the inside of mathematics. Percepts from the outside, such as the visual feed, are what either get prioritized or demoted (i.e. this is the character of selection) depending on the conceptualization in the monad. The grander, outermost layers of conceptual wrapping are where we get the most influentual decisions being made. A scientist many years ago wrote about something called the "active network", where it was expected that the brain spent most of its time in the neuroscientific synaptic activity sense. Scientists thought they were onto something great if they could link the brain's preferred activity regions into some nonlocal, frequency type of encodings (as if spending time in a certain brain region in a certain spatiotemporal pattern could give you godlike thought clarity). In existence, in reality, we do indeed spend time in different conceptual layers and we can hop about them and traverse them, just like we would naturally do in the world of computer programming, computer debugging, and the conceptual-level-of-promotion switch between different scopes of reference. The general human language point of reference for this is what linguistically we call "the frame of reference". Autistic sensory types don't like you generalizing concepts for yourself via intuitive thinking if it isn't in a dictionary already exactly as such, but this is a generalizable highly intuitive way of using a concept to transcend and navigate and traverse other concepts.
1457
1458Percepts can be visuals in the mind's eye; they can be colours; shapes; anything to do with synesthesia (combines notes and colours for example; or Alma Deutscher's mother mentioned she associates letters of the alphabet with something and it's always consistent she said); there is a synesthesia to do with time as well, and there is that savant who remembers exactly what the weather was like for each day in history that he started recalling it from. Percepts are undeniably simply linked with concepts. It's inescapable. The inescapable conclusion is that there is a liminal blend between concept and percept, and that this is entirely mathematical because of the way that sinusoids work. Concepts conceptually define and shape percepts. When you dream, or even when you engage hypnagogic imagery, your mind is making more of the frequency domain information and converting more of it into brain signal patterns to your free liking. It's at this point during hypnagogic episodes that peoples' minds typically shut off the part of the brain to do with committing these hypnagogic "eyelid movies" images to long-term memory. Pioneers of hypnagogia invented things like holding a key so it makes a noise when you drop it trying to fall asleep, so that the hypnagogic imagery could be written down instead of drifting off to sleep and forgetting it ever happened. The portal to sleep must be involving the quality of how our bicameral minds, our Higher Self functionality, are interweaving and interpenetrating. It’s a strange “phase change” process exactly because concept and holism is intermixing with percept and localism. That’s actually definitionally what is actually happening. It’s not full concept (dreaming), and it’s not lucid dreaming, and it’s not percepts-primary existence. Hypnagogia and hypnopompia are literally ontologically the “self mind sex” of the apex expression of the finest firmest tightest strands between the left brain and the right brain of your mind, where consciousness at large (being selectionally seated in the left brain to enter physcality “en masse” is being converged and transported and zoomed and squeezed back into the nonzero frequency domain (in influence), exactly as a mathematical living function that we “see through and experience” because of implications of such mathematical effect and conditionality. Hypnagogia was poignant enough for Edgar Allan Poe and others to write about exactly because it piqued interests of the minds of highly capable left-right brain bicameralism, thereby extending the effects of the consciousness even in the tightrope towards sleep and dreams, enough so to have the sense of mind too before they got too far in, to have the presence of mind to stop and write them down.
1459
1460“Early references to hypnagogia are to be found in the writings of Aristotle, Iamblichus, Cardano, Simon Forman, and Swedenborg. Romanticism brought a renewed interest in the subjective experience of the edges of sleep. In more recent centuries, many authors have referred to the state; Edgar Allan Poe, for example, wrote of the ‘fancies’ he experienced ‘only when I am on the brink of sleep, with the consciousness that I am so.’”
1461
1462- Wikipedia
1463
1464How do you solve the problem of sleep? For that, we will have to as a collective work together because there’s no way we will develop angel tier general unconscious math. Not even humans who can unconsciously and nichely employ the very costly flickerings of telekinesis, can ever avoid having to sleep! Sleep is a general conceptual problem to solve, of parallellism of a particular type and terrain over in the spatiotemporal knowledge category of mind. Nobody who is human has any access to expertise on this domain. We don’t get knowledge of sleep precisely because existence can be generally parallellized (expressed and impressed in parallel) in terms of the grandest general conceptual concepts. Spatiotemporal existence “patterns” and intricacies surrounding brains, neurons and neuron firing patterns are categorically a radically “bad port” domain for us to try to deal with; it’s the insurmountable wall of “early game” God Game Planet evolution. We can’t specifically work out yet what exact mathematical functions will be required to manipulate brains, or even TV screens, without breaking them and if this is so, there must be a hard ontological rational limit set into preventing this (no psychic powers geniuses going out of control as terrorists!), and if this is so, then this principle must be built into existence as a natural state and style and pattern of dialectically arriving at evolution towards angel and god level;- i.e., life always discusses something (planets), then defines itself initially (dinosaurs and modern civilized life), then ascends to rationality (logos), then manipulates matter freely. Remember that at no point can artificial angel interference intervene with this process. You are not going to learn telekinesis in 50 years’ time. That is categorically and necessarily impossible, and comes built into the foundation of existence, enshrined by the PSR. Remember that angels know what’s generally going to happen over the next 50 years and they would have to then be protracted into some awkward psychological game if “magical gifted powers humans” appeared on Earth within 50 years from now. Think how impossible that would make it for angels to watch over this planet, and why that categorically cannot happen.
1465
1466Don’t play with your food. Do play with your words and your grammar structures!
1467
1468
1469
1470
1471
1472Analytically, percepts are mathematics, and mathematics can reflect on itself precisely because it can use the spatiotemporal low-frequency matter (vision) in tandem with the nonlocal frequency domain (right brain), as well as pure frequency mathematics to do with pinpointing and locating and coordinating spacetime locality of reference (left brain). These abilities are not ad-hoc, abstract and extensional via abstraction as empiricism claims (or would claim if they could), but these come with the properties and mechanisms of conception itself. Why? Simply because we can access the full range of sinusoids, within which these "categories" emerge and fit and go back in the fold/box. Existence outwith mind, and conceptualization per se, is impossible. There is no such thing as scientific "no background dependency" abstraction which generates sentience. It cannot conceptually define itself and nobody can defend it philosophically. It is a poorly formed thought leaning on the sensory cognitive space.
1473
1474
1475Look at this sentence again from that last paragraph:
1476
1477“Why? Simply because we can access the full range of sinusoids, within which these "categories" emerge and fit and go back in the fold/box.”
1478
1479..and because we don't and can't do anything else (of dimensional extension around our body for example, or to manage multiple events in the world or multiple tasks at the same time) because there is no such provision and cannot be; the PSR requires that all thought is collapsed neatly from one point of locality; one locus of control; that that is the conception which mind engages in the wavefunction collapse.
1480
1481Think about it. If you have mathematical infinitude (given by sinusoids) then an infinite invisible non-dimensional wavefunction collapse is all you need within which to fit all the "spread" spacetime detail into, when this gets committed to the objective wavefunction. That's "where" all the instructions of your body goes. It's literally mathematically how the instructions to control your body are wrapped around in a mathematical skin. The mathematical projection concerns dimensionality versus nondimensionality, and the secret to this is in Fourier mathematics. 1 + 1 = 2 is a zero-dimensional expression, but if you can conceive of mathematics which forces monads to perceive in established patterns then you can conceive of how math can be translated from one mathematical domain into another at no cost. The translation is a mathematical translation in eternity outside of space and time.
1482
1483Mathematical rational mind acts through its sinusoids, not “with” them. You are analytically pointing the scenario from the wrong direction. The correct direction is parallellism and conceptual thinking. Remember that consciousness on a God Game Planet of our “heavyweight” would have to necessarily and categorically support the increasing of consciousness via language and conceptual thinking, and not an instant overnight (as ranged over decades) transition towards pure hard conscious math. Nobody is making that boat! Titanic! It’s impossible to bridge such a thing.
1484
1485The iceberg in Titanic was just the tip of the iceberg that we could see. In ontological mathematics, the full range of infinite sinusoids, every single last possible number, actually exists within the monad acting as the monad constantly, in parallel, shifting and waving us forward like a Mexican Wave all the time. This is necessarily and categorically always active within us.
1486
1487
1488
1489So it's partially because souls can enter embodied life at multiple mathematical locuses of zero-dimensional terms with varying differing translations of that same ontological mathematical language, that they can become sentient and conscious - by interfacing the body Fourier math with the visuals, and with the senses from the wavefunction collapse and its generative percepts, to give rise to a unified flowing front. That's the mental conception space tying things together conceptually. That's what our monads are doing right now.
1490
1491The percepts from spacetime are commensurate in essential absolute mathematical terms with the concepts because they are from the same mathematical background dependency (ontological mathematics). The key and the trick here behind sentience is that it brings together (conceptually bound) different types of mathematics operating in markedly different, distinct, mathematical domains (such as how we bring ourselves drawn to convert using Fourier transforms versus inverse Fourier transforms, and spacetime hand-to-eye coordination versus abstract goals, and these spaces must dialectically interact). So the souls dialectically evolve and exhaust all interior conceptual differences of (anti)symmetry until none are left. We get consciousness along the way (mind first jumps into one of the spaces of translation, like conceptually matching a body with a primordial mind-space, later adding touch and then vision) and this is literally mathematically how souls dialectically individuate. We are, in a sense of course, eternal blackboards projecting artificial mental contents on an artificial analytical mathematical "screen". This is the type of thought that horrified thinkers like Albert Camus. It drove them crazy. They said everything was arbitrary. The thing is however, that nothing of society and the existential or rational or romantic fabric is lost this way. We are only becoming conscious, and this is indeed a PSR universe. Don't worry!- We can still conceptually drop back into sensory space! We can still enjoy sex and food and comfort. We can still have romance; we can still fall in love. But the point of this is that we gain more powerful, more conscious minds, giving us existential freedoms in a more generalized sense.
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496In the 2nd Kingsman movie, the killer dog robots are subvertible by putting the face of Elton John in front of them, who they register as "friend". Harry can stay behind Elton John and keep hitting the robot dog with the bowling ball from the side. Where do unconventional solutions come from?- They come from the precise analytical conceptual coordination of mind, which has dialectically been converging across different mathematical spaces (sense-space, visual-space, coordinate-space, mind-space) conceptually bound via the monad, expressed in a different way where one dialectical strand has started to free the others. This isn't possible via a linear-only, flat-only, no-background-dependency type of universe operating purely "scientifically" on percepts, as is the type of conception forwarded by empiricism. That's exactly why we can have variance in unconventional, "off the wall", "outside the box" type thinking;- it's because mind is cross-domain within and also outwith spacetime. It's amazing because our dialectical strands flutter and fly all over the place conceptually, as if in different diagonal directions. Science and materialism could only suggest that percepts upon percepts, as an abstraction and in a linear chain of causation fashion, generates consciousness (or sentience in the case of animals). It's far too dull and limited a conception for life and mind. It's simply implausible. It cannot offer any such range of conception and conceptualization that would deliver selective freedom(!). We would be totally constrained to percepts, which could not in the first place, by that definition, generate life and mind (as everything would be robotically attached informationally at the hip, due to the monoculture of percepts acting upon percepts in abstraction).
1497
1498
1499"Lateral thinking is a manner of solving problems using an indirect and creative approach via reasoning that is not immediately obvious. It involves ideas that may not be obtainable using only traditional step-by-step logic.
1500
1501"The term was promulgated in 1967 by Edward de Bono. He cites as an example the Judgment of Solomon, where King Solomon resolves a dispute over the parentage of a child by calling for the child to be cut in half, and making his judgment according to the reactions that this order receives. Edward de Bono also links lateral thinking with humour, arguing there's a switch-over from a familiar pattern to a new, unexpected one. It is in this moment of surprise generating laughter and new insight which facilitates the ability of seeing a different thought pattern which initially was not obvious.
1502
1503"According to de Bono, lateral thinking deliberately distances itself from the standard perception of creativity as "vertical" logic (the classic method for problem solving). "
1504
1505    Wikipedia
1506
1507What is vertical logic? It’s the domain, pattern and strand (abstract; conceptual; truthfully operating in parallel in individual styles across all minds conscious to it) of a consistent general contingent form which is resultant by the expressions yielded from it. All thinking domains must categorically follow this pattern. If this wasn’t so, everyone would have a common mathematical “interface” to reality, and we wouldn’t have such brilliant variance of individuals on Earth. We’d all be robots! Fancy that!
1508
1509
1510
1511
1512Life choices are made on the basis of hard conceptual analysis, rooted in the absolute and the analytical. Contingent thoughts belong to the contingent category of existence, but dialectically the contingent thought dialectic builds up better and sharper conceptual edges to its thoughts, making it no longer just something that is unconscious, confused and stubborn. People become conscious, and they start to hook onto absolute frames of reference to make more sophisticated choices due to constellation of influence (monads interact with monads in the social informational capacity). Bear in mind of course all this is raw math, but expressed in subjective and objective forms; linear and diagonally parallell across the different mind-spaces (emotion-space, mind-space, intuition-space, vision-space, sensuality-space, pet-owner-space, and so on for every domain of life selected under particular contingent terms [expression] of such selection).
1513
1514Science’s “Set Theory” is the laughable notion that everything cleanly reduces and defines to a single group, a set, with no such innate conceptual defintional requirements of such a set. Sets are said to have “containers”, so you can contain a set inside a “container”. Well – that’s useful for, uhm, what? The whole point(!) is that they’re trying to range abstraction away from life, making this absurdly difficult for absolutely no reason. Life categorically must be conceptual (as in the conceptual rational proof of Set Theory’s even existence) but that emphatically and categorically is not the limits of basis conception and concepts. If it was, you would be able to do something with conceptual primitives like these “containers”, which you categorically can’t do. This is because, simply, we live in a conceptually closing universe (as must the wavefunction for the spatiotemporal universe work, via even the most dumb souls who can act as cellular life or not even that) that is here in the case of scientists’ rare souls, autistically emulating the opposite functionality of pure left brainism which only slaps up and secures upwards in constructional definitional clarity, opening up things in conception instead of closing them down in conception. Scientists categorically can’t tell what they’re doing precisely because their brains are only working primarily in this left brained sense. That’s why some mathematicians and programmers absurdly scoff at the idea the universe is made of pure math. They definitionally cannot tell the inverse properties of what they are talking about. That’s the ontological source, the style and expression, which mandates with conditionality that you won’t get a good answer out of them.
1515
1516Souls are not free to range conclusions and insights over things of no general interest. You are not free to help individual children or people out of dire straights or personal problems, because these problems will keep coming up in different formulations and manifestations. This is by definition to say that the mathematics you do interest yourself with, will be the ones that free the general scope over freedom for life for as many people as possible, by the sheer commensurate basis that the generalization process of the dialectics of mind offers the best utility, best reasoning problem-solving power and best rational basis standpoint for further considerations. This is a conceptual difference, not an additive difference, and that’s the whole point (because concepts are intelligible, because math formulations are always something understood when expressible and reflectable in mass webbed parallel in sinusoidal capacity by an eternally thinking monad).
1517
1518
1519
1520
1521If you could do full telekinesis, you could spin a cube in the air by your head. But since you don't produce thoughts along a wavefunction which achieve this, we say that you "stay in your body". Note how modern this is and how it completely cannot encapsulate the meaning and selection of what is actually happening. That's wholly to do with our thinking habits being that we reflect constructs and frames of reference of spatiotemporality. If you could do telekinesis spinning the cube lying in bed with your eyes closed, that again presents something else which reveals shockingly our inability to use our modern human language to reflect the ontological mathematical nature of reality. We don't have a frame of reference for this, just as most people don't have a frame of reference for talking in highly intuitive schematic terms about how the world of conjoined phenomena really works (business, big pharma, big oil, biodiversity, total mass of insects on the planet, the population in each major nation, political and psychological wills of the people, characters of each nation, corruption and cronyism, psychopathy, mass production, rare Earth materials, and so on).
1522
1523In magic, the thought exists in only one mind and has no background dependency to rely on in a genuine, corroborable, mutable, compatible, correspondingly and coherently reflective sense. Magic is poorly formed thought. It's will and mystical intuition, not intellect, reasoning and rational intuition combining thinking and intuiting at the same time.
1524
1525Imagine a bright, spiritual oracle woman existed and she had an ancient, absolute ontological "protection" on her that facilitated that nobody could harm her after the place where it extended. She would wear such a large bronze "bangle" around her neck and smaller ones on her wrists. Meaning that no tyrant could use a guillotine on her, since the magic would not wear off and each bangle would protect the other bangles' constitution and legitimacy (as we now have decided to introduce into the conception and thus it has wider broad-band implications for mechanisms of causation). But this type of thought only exists in one mind, and is contingent creation and composition of sinusoids, which no each other monad can be consistently reliably relied upon to think similarly in concert. That's due to ontological mathematics (sinusoids i.e. the full range of them, and The God Equation;- Euler's Identity) providing an absolute mathematical backdrop to consistently produce thoughts of a certain common ontological form (Euler's Identity is actually the unit monad! It's the expression of pure concept, thus it exists as pure concept). This is exactly why magic cannot work. magic is unilateral and has no background dependency. Existence and causation are multilateral and have the background dependency of absolute ontological mathematics (sinusoids). The only true, real magic is how we can convince all other souls eventually to stop willing and thinking (The Omega Point) and how we can become conscious to do and express things which would otherwise never be possible. In this sense, magic is the special pleading of extreme individuation and extreme rationality. In this view, angels and gods are the most magical; and animals and insects and trees are actually the least magical. Conscious humans are magical – and not mystical intuitives, mystics and gurus. Conscious humans could in the future thus become healthy, intuitive Sacred spiritual guides (priests and priestesses) in an exciting, enjoyable, wondrous and interesting rational way for humanity. The full human expression of human interest, human joy, human pleasure, human excitement, human mystery and mystique and intrigue, is something we can explore fully on this basis. But only on a rational grounding and standpoint.
1526
1527When an angel reforms a body, the content of this thought is unilateral but the form of this thought is multilateral (absolute; universal). That is what allows the angel to collapse its results into the wavefunction (because we cannot trace these as particulars of only contingency all the way up, because they are not so). The particular is part of the universal, just as the particle is part of the wave and just as the object is part of the subject (the unit monad). There can be no full due separation because there is no true technical, legal, authentic actualizable such "separation" (as a something which is only Something and more than Nothing simply cannot ontologically exist). In here we are seeing reflections of balance, order and symmetry. The PSR literally implies all of this. The PSR is of course simply a conscious reflection of supersymmetry in mass parallel contingent thought of mind;- althought it has not grasped this consciously yet. Even the PSR must have contingent “spread” thought basis!!! Even the PSR must actually conceptually map, not to one locus which is statically held and imposed as an arbitrary unreachable point of fancy or curve over the space of thought;- but it must be something not weighted over any part of the Eulerian circle (that would break and fall foul of the PSR’s properties) and generalized so as to be reducibly possible to be found analytically and dialectically by any soul from any arbitrary basis position or state of development. The PSR must be conceptual and it must be a generalized concept rather than a specific, highly sharply crisply rigid concept. (This is actually given in how it’s reflectable over all other mental contents). The only conclusion we can arrive at is that the PSR, like all generalizable concepts, must move and shift with the rest of the monadic “soul state”, and must be grounded in contingent parallel reflectivity capacity [with so to generalize] over a moving mathematical surface, grid, or web.
1528
1529Brexit prompted words like unilateral (when one political party wants to make a legal deal choice which affects all the other countries, as in staying in the EU after failing to leave it on ideal terms) to come into our mind space to conceptually reflect its interoperability with conceptual detail and absolutes, which is dialectical. If this was a scientific universe of no background dependency, this couldn't take place because every word, there being no frequency domain to grab (and individuate for) them from, words would each have to exist not as frequency noumena in themselves, and would forever be misplacable as "abstraction" as empirical science likes to put it, having to rebound and refract off of percepts acting upon percepts to ever produce anything (but since there is no absolute frame of reference via the full range of sinusoids, nothing can ever be solidly reliably defined in a stable and consistently reliable way). Highly abstract couldn’t be invented by highly uniquely noumenally journeyed souls off the tracks of everyone else’s shared “normal” development ranges; and words couldn’t be transmissible memes and they couldn’t impress or change society by imposing noumenal conceptual order. Percepts cannot interact with percepts directly for exactly this reason: it cannot be well-defined and cannot ontologically produce anything that features a grounded, absolute sinusoidal mathematical selection based upon frequency (sinusoids). That's the requirement for selection and information handling. Selection and information handling must be grounded in sinusoids, mind, life, conceptualization, conceptual existence, and the wavefunction collapse (and this must be multilateral causation, never unilateral causation as science absurdly claims that its "unintelligible" wavefunction is). Science's conception of wavefunction collapse has multilateral effects but unilateral causation, which is of course inconsistent and absurd. Angel thoughts by contrast, have unilateral finesse of intention and description but multilateral effect and multilateral causation (because it's part of ontological mathematical existence). These things are "built into" the unit monad i.e. you either rationally derive and deductively arrive-at why they are so rationally irreducible in certain ways, or you get into very sticky messy territory of not being able to properly define or form your thought such that it's reconstructible neatly and correctly in the minds of others, appropriately and of course to some given existential rational actualizable aim. Philosophy is about consistently reliably reconstructing "characteristic", rationally analytically "descriptive" (form-and-structure-expounding) thoughts. Mathematical philosophy (ontological mathematics the subject) is an objective thinking process intending to clarify and elucidate objective noumenal structure and form (the nature and structure of existence).
1530
1531Can you objectively see yourself? Can you read your own words in an unassuming context, and “re-experience them” in the right ways as if fresh in the mind? Can you simulate others’ thinking over your content? You can only know yourself, principally, by completing more efforts and then conceptually looking back on them from the new (supersymmetrized parallel) viewpoint. This is a type of consciousness which relates us conceptually as to how we used to be, act, conceptualize, think, and impress. This is using deep introverted thinking allied with sharp introverted intuition exposed to objective thinking habits. Consider that even the angels only specialize in one principal direction “at this depth”. The depth is outwards, and inwards, at the same time (which, if you think to project all possible sinusoids here – this can only mean, more symmetry and closer values, wherever they are around the circle).
1532
1533
1534
1535Magic has to do with irreducibility. In Berserk, magic works in a very unique way where it has abstract, long-ranging, broad-phase, wide-sweeping Mind interoperability:
1536
1537"A beherit resembles an egg, covered with human facial features arrayed across its surface, giving it a rather disconcerting appearance. While seemingly inanimate most times, beherits appear to be living things, possessing an aura of unspecified dread about them. On occasion, one of a beherit's eyes may open and stare at an examiner, though this is usually disregarded as an illusion. Additionally, when mishandled, a beherit may give off notable expressions of discomfort.
1538
1539"The purpose of a beherit is to create an Interstice between the Physical World and part of the Astral World where the members of the God Hand reside, granting their owners an audience with the angels. A beherit belongs to a predestined owner and therefore, no matter the circumstances, will always find its way to them when said owner's desire is great enough. Upon activation, the fetish rearranges its facial features, forming a distressed face which sheds tears of blood and emits a low scream before creating a temporal junction.
1540
1541"Beherits are not rendered null after activation, and at any time can be used to escape death by summoning the God Hand and offering another sacrifice ...
1542
1543"The Crimson Beherit, also known as the Egg of the King, is the most distinguished of the arcane artifacts, said to grant one the world in exchange for the owner's flesh and blood. Appearing once every 216 years, when the time of the Eclipse draws near, owners of Crimson Beherits are destined to discard their humanity in exchange for being reborn as an angel of the God Hand. It is unknown whether there exist several different Crimson Beherits or if the same beherit came to each of the God Hand members in turn. "
1544
1545    Berserk Wikia page
1546
1547This type of magic is unilateral (one side determines all sides), since it has an abstract affect which coordinates and arranges events to revolve around circumstantial "luck", (the One Ring from the Lord of the Rings works in a very similar capacity, finding its desired owner by bending wills and circumstance, only Satanically), but supposedly we are to presume it has a divine ontological capability of thought i.e. it would be an angelic, well-formed thought with the complete set of sinusoids. In reality, Simon Magus used the holy grail object which, if it was real, was exactly facilitated this way, i.e. by the well-formed wavefunction collapse of either angels or gods. There is also the old story about the Cathars seeing their names appear etched on the holy grail orb, signifying that by defending secret knowledge resolutely they would escape to divinity if they were then burned at the stake by the Christians just shortly afterwards. Would the holy grail, in such a circumstance, deliver a piece of music personalized for your life and struggles? Would the angels rendition their own choir for you? Would it sound like Duo des Fleurs?
1548
1549
1550In one 90s movie, there is a reincarnation process where a man is involved in a traffic accident and reincarnates back into his own family, having accidentally avoided the part where everyone coming into heaven is usually sprayed by angels with a special spray to forget all the previous life's memories. He learns to become happy and accept his new existence. Thoughts like these may be the final satisfying, soothing closure thoughts experienced by non-embodied human souls after they die. During the initial process here they have access to their mortal persona for a short time, and they can still connect with the souls of their loved ones.
1551
1552Chances Are (1989): A reincarnated man unknowingly falls in love with his own daughter from his previous life. Once he realizes this, he tries to end their relationship before angels erase his memory.
1553
1554Made In Heaven (1987): After being dumped by his girlfriend, a boy runs away to California. But he ends up in heaven because he dies after trying to help a family from drowning in a river. In heaven he'll meet a beautiful girl, who has never reincarnated before.
1555
1556Defending Your Life (1991): In an afterlife way station resembling a block of hotels, the lives of the recently-deceased are examined in a court-like setting.
1557
1558What Dreams May Come (1998): After he dies in a car crash, a man searches heaven and hell for his beloved wife.
1559
1560Wings of Desire (1987): An angel tires of overseeing human activity and wishes to become human when he falls in love with a mortal.
1561
1562Hearts and Souls (1993): A businessman is reunited with the four lost souls who were his guardian angels during childhood, all with a particular purpose to joining the afterlife.
1563
1564Michael (1996): Two tabloid reporters checking out a report of the Archangel Michael living with an old woman find that it's true. But that's not the only surprise.
1565
1566Always (1989): The spirit of a recently deceased expert pilot mentors a newer pilot while watching him fall in love with the girlfriend that he left behind.
1567
1568
1569We need more Goddess movies! Code Geass is a Goddess mythos rather than a mythos focusing completely on men (The Bechdel test is relevant). At least in Code Geass, the highly ambitious masculine will to rule the world in a Sacred, Gnostic way (Lelouch/Zero) is counterbalanced by his equal, the phoster/archon resemblant C.C., a "witch". She more resembles a Goddess than a witch, of course; she is an Oracle figure, an Anima figure, a Phoster/Archon figure and a Priestess all rolled into one! What a woman. The equality of a sacred pact of spiritual partner/accomplice is explicitly mentioned and it's clear that Lelouch and C.C. are some kind of intellectual and spiritual equals. In the grand scheme, Lelouch initially provides imperfect, burning Will and Intellect (thesis) and C.C. provisions the highly individuated Angelic Intellect and Wisdom / Domain Knowledge (antithesis) and the other characters produce Nihilism (antithesis) and the political circumstances and Old World Order personal wills (antithesis) to produce the plot progression via conceptual reintegration (synthesis).
1570
1571In Before Sunrise, two people meet in a rare chance of soulmates encountering each other in big international cities. Mind over matter. That's what the film is about; just two people meeting and connecting and talking. That's it. That's full enough to fill the plot.
1572
1573It's amazing how you can find much better movies by simply plugging in a key (conceptual) index like "reincarnation". A keyword is an index; anything for an intuitive mind can function as an index (like an aspect of some commonality, like colour or the aesthetic symmetry across certain visual phenomena) and the ultimate indexes by which to find things are the highly evolved concepts we use (we will in future centuries find soulmates via concepts, not particulars and percepts grouped together). Art house films (being recommended) are an index, by which you can judge the quality of a soulmate candidate. We use particlars and percepts to bring us coordinated towards the thoughts which are then coordinating of other conceptions and thoughts. You couldn't make it up. What happens in microcosm must be happening in macrocosm, and vice versa. As above, so below. The rational proof that we do one thing allows us to mathematically project and transpose this contingent form in other mathematical conceptual styles (and mental domains). If we are obviously "evidently" able to do this (meaning, evident to intuition by reflection and introversion as a self-validated unconscious proof), then we know it's real.
1574
1575What happens when you “sleep on it” halfway a movie? You embed and encode curiosity into your unconscious contents, and your right brain conception will try to “enclose” down upon something holistically.
1576
1577What is hesitation? It’s that suspension mode where you injected/inserted something into a conceptual process of the domain of all life (like a particular computer program that won’t let you paste after it’s been closed after you tried to copy something, making it a very odd exception that “sticks out”), and this is all the meaning to having to rectify and resolve what we are doing (in a conscious matter consciously; hence the suspension of the left brain and being “out of it”) while trying to resolve some other (wider of scope) action.
1578
1579Scope is a term taken from computer programming (computer software or computer programming is the/an art of conceptual piecemeal building).
1580
1581
1582
1583
1584In Code Geass, Lelouch sums up his journey so far at the end when he says that he is under the "geass" (a bicameral command which doubles up as a Grail Power given by a Goddess/Priestess) of the collective unconscious' will for a better, brighter world. That's exactly what the most highly intuitive souls inescapably converge on, at least initially. The angels and gods are the more authentically driven than us in this capacity, by the binding spell of the collective will to improve existential contingent reality experience for all. (Of course, this is a highly conscious subject-matter, and scientists can never get it without intuition which comes from a background-dependent reality grounded in absolute frame of reference). The key reason and explanation for why angels are more responsive to the Hegelian absolute is that angels have a more conscious access to the sinusoidal contingent supersymmetry of broad band range and configurational utility (that’s their soul contents). These two properties (generally improving experiential existence for everyone, and conceptual thinking power) are exactly the same principal thing (parallellized nature) expressed differently. Conceptions ranged over very different categories and domains of life can still mean principally the same thing. They can still principally expose similar mathematical properties “under the hood”.
1585
1586“Logic might have been defined as the science of thought, and of its laws and characteristic forms. But thought, as thought, constitutes only the general medium, or qualifying circumstance, which renders the Idea distinctively logical.”
1587
1588- Hegel
1589
1590Thought must be conceptually, analytically clean in the order of what it achieves to do. In the broad band range of infinite sinusoids, we can actually find many multiple possible configurational positionings of parallel lateral sinusoidal configurations. This is why peoples’ ideas and suggestions and solutions are always so unique. While one man in rural Russia might decide to place the giant metal equivalent of your common pasta twirls as part home built snow vehicle, a genius might decide to invent the helicopter and submarine as Leonardo Da Vinci did;- people in the same circumstances even, can categorically come up with different (formulations of) ideas. This provision is encoded into reality itself via infinitude of configurable sinusoids that we are drawing from all the time. We are drawing from them all to be able to think; to select words from a vast vocabulary (really vocab is our outputs not our soul contents! Zoinks!); sinusoids are our “empirical” (contingently proven i.e. arrived) ability to digest logos philosophically. Thoughts are always thus “colourful”, and vibrant hypnagogia from sleep deprivation will show you that unmistakably.
1591
1592
1593“The first question is: What is the object of our science? The simplest and most intelligible answer to this question is that Truth is the object of Logic.”
1594
1595- Hegel
1596
1597Parallellism is the locus of convergence upon a point of contention (pointedness), as well as being the basis quality of the function of the range of sinusoids. This must be so, and it must be being matheamtically reflecting what sinusoids can, in principal – that is to say, in conception or conceptually – are doing. Domains, parallellism, the PSR and even holism can be mathematically reflected in parallel simply because of the innate properties of the Riemann sphere. We would say that holism is the cloak around the whole of the Riemennian sphere (the general aspect of the absolute!), which suffers no contingent shift in change by rotating any which way (via conceptual reflection) around the Riemann sphere. This is indeed what gives us the basis for consciousness, via mathematical parallelism of reflection (i.e. where reflection is raised to the properties of parallellism; parallellism’s conceptual qualities). Life definitionally must be so as this, “true to form”, because contingent form must be able to reframe itself over the Riemann sphere and around the insides of it (the frame of reference!) while never actually wholly mathematically disintegrating the analytical quality of reach (the gain) of its results. All contingent thought must be strictly analytical and it must strictly only come to purely analytical completion, and all thought in a PSR-type universe must categorically and necessarily and absolutely never “touch anything” which is to say, it must be essentially contingently “formless” on the whole, which is to say, that all thought ranged and wrapped around the Riemann sphere in totality must be Equation with net zero. Abracadabra!
1598
1599What is the colour of your paint over your imagined Riemann Sphere? Is it cobalt blue?
1600
1601Of course, a Riemann Sphere world would principally allow us to travel all over the globe, even as animals and insects! It would allow us the principal innate, easier, mathematics to interoperate the essential elements of things like sea voyages and road building, simply by “zooming in or out” the scale of the Riemannian unconscious properties of the mind in between the conceptual-contents mental steps that we take before “placing our legs on the ground”, into the portal of the virtual spatiotemporal domain. Mathematical reference-frames, like the trace of the soul which gets used to its “sleeve” in the TV show Altered Carbon, are what the soul “thinks it’s doing” and what it gets impressed into, in exactly the analogous way that a video game player thinks as though they’re inside the video game world. Virtual extension, as it happens of course, is always zero-dimensional! Who woulda thunk it?
1602
1603In the strictly left-brain sense, we can reduce the holistic right brain’s contribution of “zooming in or out” with an ontological mathematical conception like amplitude.
1604
1605
1606
1607“The term ‘follow the white rabbit’ comes from ancient mystical texts that were destroyed by the Church many century’s ago. It came from the Gnostic teachings and were in reference to mans spiritual pursuit of the meaning of life and his futility in trying to find it. A tattered remnant of this story was found in the excavations of ruins in ancient Egypt. It seems the story revealed that in the pursuit of the ‘white rabbit’ at some point the rabbit would stop in its tracks and turn around and attack you with its long claws and sharp teeth. Some experts claim the remnants are fake and the story is absurd. A famous theologian in the Church on his deathbed is said to have screamed that he was being attacked by a huge white rabbit but the Church denies this as a malicious rumor.”
1608
1609 - Quora commenter
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
1617
1618
1619The Dark Souls series (video game) attempts to mix Goddess elements ("the Fire Maiden") with other archetypal information and archetypes; the characters sitting defeated and sulking are of the Fallen Hero archetype. Various characters on their existential Grail Journey are sitting around the sporadic bonfires in the dead lands of the Ignavi. (Most gamers failed to get the fourth wall message which is even spelled out for them in the title; if you are not helping the planetary journey in life then you are one of the lost souls). In Dark Souls, the principal overt (obvious) objective is to "eat" the souls of the dim spirits, thus growing in depth and significance in order to fight the bosses; the Demiurgal figures that block the path to gnosis and complete knowledge, power and clarity. Threshold Guardians mark the way at each major step of the journey. It is a Gnostic mythos meant to depict and reflect spiritual life in a most abstract sense. Most gamers are actually Sensing types, so they impose an overt narrative and spiritual net of poor intuition. This is particularly evident where some gamers criticize the quality of current video games while others say to shut up and enjoy what you're given. Gnostic, intuitive souls always want to break down barriers and reinvent newly potentious outcomes and opportunities; dark souls can't conceptualize of the new potential, hence definitionally, conceptually, "withdraw" into what is comfortable as Settlers (from our subjective viewpoint). It's the job of everyone's Person to evolve into a Pioneer capacity (such as with music, art, poetry, writing and other free expression). Even choosing to expand your horizons imaginatively, or to engage your Active Imagination or try lucid dreaming, would be a start. The least imaginative cannot even do that; due in part of the world's imposed narrative and spiritual constraints imposed over them like a net.
1620
1621
1622“[Slave Knight Gael:] Ahh, merciful goddess, mother of the Forlorn, who have no place to call their own...”  - Dark Souls 3
1623
1624
1625
1626"Legacy of Kain: Soul Reaver is a third-person action-adventure video game, developed by Crystal Dynamics and published by Eidos Interactive. It was released for the PlayStation and Microsoft Windows in 1999, and for the Dreamcast in 2000. As the second game in the Legacy of Kain series, Legacy of Kain: Soul Reaver is the sequel to 1996's Blood Omen: Legacy of Kain, developed by Silicon Knights. It was succeeded by three games, one of which - Soul Reaver 2 - is a direct sequel.
1627
1628"Legacy of Kain: Soul Reaver begins 1500 years after the events of Blood Omen: Legacy of Kain, and chronicles the journey of the vampire-turned-wraith Raziel, lieutenant to Kain (the protagonist of the original game). Raziel is executed by Kain, but is revived by the Elder God to become his "soul reaver" and to exact revenge. Raziel shares this title with Kain's sword, the Soul Reaver, which he acquires during the game.
1629
1630"Crystal Dynamics began development of the game in 1997, but a deteriorating relationship with Silicon Knights created legal problems. This and other delays forced material originally planned for Legacy of Kain: Soul Reaver to be excised or reworked into later entries in the series. The game was generally well-received by critics, attaining a score of 91 on Metacritic, and being praised for its Gothic story and high-quality graphics. However, it was criticized for simple and repetitive gameplay and an unsatisfying climax." 
1631
1632- Gamepedia
1633
1634People were stunned by the depth and the quality of writing of this video game. It was of course made by highly intuitive souls; "synth souls". The artwork for the game reveals cancelled planned ambitious game environments that were going to be made. Video game projects initially produce "concept art" at the pre-production stage. Art, in other words, being creativity (creation), is conceptual and thus powerfully transformative for our imagination and (at its best) our spirit. How many utterly unforgettable stories are there that resonated with your spirit? Which stories absolutely changed your life; saved your soul?
1635
1636“Stomp over it; dominate”. The key thing about archetypes is they’re not broad-band-appropriate;- like percepts, we need to experience them and undergo them in order to individuate them into our soul in the ways which suit well. We need to dialectically find and resolve how they will stitch into the sinusoidal absolute mathematical mix of our mental infinite-sinusoidal-range expressions. All percepts and all media and all social interactions are bound by the rules of percepts and perceptual transmission. It doesn’t matter whether it’s tripping up on a pavement, a staircase, or whether it’s changing your sex or masturbation habits in radically new ways. The universe cares not about how these things used to be orchestrated recently for you, or how they are provisioned;- that’s just your own soul contents talking. Only conception gets results. Perception is not seeing; it’s estimating without clarity. That’s the key difference between judging and perceiving. Judging takes you somewhere dialectically by resolving broader-band claims. Perception traces rings around the rims; conception deals with life more holistically in a targeted way (utilizing the left brain). Perception is right-brained in a sense and Judging is left-brained in a sense. Judging powerfully maximizes our synergistic left-right brain outputs into better outcomes, which is all the reason that the highest thinking revealing the most detail and clarity is like this. Judging has to ultimately be both left-brained and right-brained, and both to a high degree of development. (Alma Deutscher demonstrated innate speaking and imagining skills at a very young age, fielding her own theory about a ticket-based reincarnational process).
1637
1638Archetypes: The Warrior Archetype, The Outlaw Archetype, The Beast Archetype, The Fallen Hero Archetype, The Wise Old Man Archetype, The Wise Old Woman Archetype, The Anima Archetype, The Animus Archetype, The Angel Archetype, The Mother Archetype, The Goddess Archetype, The Hero Archetype, The Lancer Archetype, The Herald Archetype, The Mentor Archetype, The Satan Archetype, The Lucifer Archetype, The God Archetype, The God Community Archetype, The Priestess Archetype, The Priest Archetype, The Trickster Archetype, The Sorcerer Archetype.
1639
1640Gun types are not archetypes. They are simply types. What is archetypal must be expressive in broad band (holistic) and it must come from the arche. (That’s in the name; arche-type). The arche is the nonlocal frequency domain. Whatever is conscious categorically cannot be an archetype! Archetypes are located in the unconscious; they cross the Personal Unconscious and the Collective Unconscious. Archetypes are deeply unconscious mental programs. Carl Jung likened them to imaginative instincts. We can know that a cat or a dog has archetypes (mothering and nursing its young; defensive and protective dispositions) but can’t wield the highly evolved archetypes (hero etc). Rats and even flies can bite you, but that doesn’t make their selections particularly pertinent in terms of consciousness. Consciousness, not blind-swiping rage, makes a soul rationally powerful. It’s sinusoidal parallel coordination which constitutes consciousness – specifically, well-formed hyper rational objectivity-facing sinusoidal coordination.
1641
1642One woman had a particularly vivid recurring dream of a male figure who would appear to her in a Trickster getup, and in the recent dream she had went to a fortune teller mystic, who talked with her and agreed to contact this spirit for her. The strange figure appeared leaning on the far wall, and then came over and manhandled the defenceless fortune teller woman, gripping her wrist painfully tightly and throwing her aside, only to stare and intimidate the female dreamer. It turns out the dreamer has had a history of sexual promiscuity, drugs and pleasure; and fears she will let that side of her let loose on her life again after she’s rebuilt her life with a University education. There is no reason to be afraid of our dreams; our Shadow. It is always part of us. You are actually creating your dreams; you just can’t consciously tell this at the time, and the underbelly of your psychological complexes and neuroses informs the dream structure, narrative and dream contents – as does your rationality, and your knowledge about stories, and your vivid imagination and your spirituality and life challenges and obstacles you face, and your deepest and most treasured ideals, aspirations and archetypal images, and your hopes for your world. What’s popularly called “dream anchors” are your signposts you can use to become lucid, even in a transcendental dream which shows you all the important people who affected you in early life.
1643
1644There are various archetypal responses and scenarios you can consider for your life’s circumstances. One “archetype” is the measured, controlled, hard-whipping “master” who has resolute sense of Presence for the tasks he presses out of his own Self, his life, and his mastery of command over the things he does (we could say this reflects the left brain). In more minor, unconscious roles, such an “archetype” simply relentlessly drives forward with physical force in everything it does, and it would verbalize for pain but not complaints or whining. We accidentally assume this kind of thing if we tried to interpret video game characters as archetypal projections of our ideal self (heroic, resolute against external obstacles, never bowing down in pain, pressing on when the agent force required). As you individuate you get good command of yourself.
1645
1646
1647“The Weakling is the passive shadow of the King archetype. Instead of taking control of his life and resolutely making decisions, a man possessed by the Weakling often abdicates his throne to others, handing over power, responsibility, and control of his life to them. This is the man who, though grown up, still lets his mother or father make his decisions for him. This is the man who kowtows to his boss’ or his wife’s every whim.”
1648
1649- The Art of Manliness
1650
1651Archetypes become interesting when they’re psychological. Otherwise, there’s no broad-band holistic basis for the right brain to work with. It’s a bit useless talking about “the king archetype” being someone who integrates with society in responsible ways; that’s just plain old self-awareness, self-actualization and compassion surely. Surely some things are self-evident. But when we conjure up a setting and a scenario of psychological order, hierarchy, dramatic interpersonal events and shifts and movements, possible reflections and implications for what people think of you, the threat of danger, the promise of hope in a new direction – that’s now the realm of movies, story and holism. The right brain brings together conceptual primordial elements in holistic ways. The left brain principles about conscious society don’t, because they are too openminded and rough-to-ride (for the right brain). They are not conceptually “closing”, which is entirely and wholly the problem. A picture of a seagull is conceptually closed, but the instruction of how to feed a seagull is not. Bicameralism is about how these two different domains of conceptual styles work. Bicameral stories and commands (as in BDSM) are conceptually closed. What’s conceptually closed or closing is simple to follow (formulate the contents for) the simpler it is. Bright minds love highly conceptual conceptually-closed notions and visions (like saving the world), but we love to strike and smack down (Thor!) from high holistic concept reaches. Saving the world is the holistic thesis and taking over the world is the specialistic antithesis, with the dialectic of the mind and society provisioning the synthesis. Note that this is definitionally a space encapsulating (wrapping-around conceptually) world terms of peoples; and note that definitionally this is automatically now a new mathematical domain [just like concepts can spring out of nowhere! Hmm, wonder why!]. Military strategy is part antithesis, part synthesis following this schema. A holistic high concept “closes down” in on something. It clamps down. Nazism is a holistic high concept. Meritocracy isn’t so conceptually closing, and that’s all the difference between the successes of these two systems. Nazism was a bicameral system which instantly generated lots of contented minion followers. It enlivened and encouraged souls precisely because it conceptually closed and it was encouraging and suggestive of conceptual closing all down through the conception, for the believers of tradition, culture, the valuable young German family who should receive money for sacred German children, and so on. Concepts are always parallel, and ranged to face their target audience’s preferences. The entrails of Nazism meant that people in the modern world could look at foreigners and have curiosity about the greatness of the Autobahn being built, without batting an eyelid at Nazi German atrocities against the Jews. The world didn’t move on conceptually (it didn’t evolve); and thus, we can conceptualize that, “history repeats itself”. The events are not whole, the sinusoidal substance is; and that’s why empirical “events” can repeat themselves. Empirical “events” are of course conceptions dressed up as slices of reality by a fraudulent Science costume designer.
1652
1653It’s not enough to have nonlocal frequency intuition from the Collective Unconscious in itself. You don’t somehow read a book from the gods’ souls by using intuition in itself. Intuition is always glimpsed on some thinking contents; it comes in-context. This is why people “sleep on it” and then come back to do something better the next day. If you’re particularly “lucky” your hypnopompic experiences as you wake up in the morning are when you can write things before you even get out of bed, and you remember them because they’re clear and sharp and poignant and purposeful. People forget the details they don’t care about, and the Persona mask means we are always polite but we forget about people we don’t care about at all. You use intution in tandem with thinking, because it supersedes mere memory, knowledge, and dialectical outputs you’d typically get elsewhere. Sensing is specifically for what you can’t get via intuition and thinking! That’s actually definitionally its function in rationalist human life. It has a seat below consciousness in the psyche, but that doesn’t mean senses provide a minimal role, and the same is true of emotion and happiness. Friendships is slightly different because too much contact makes your connection with someone quite suffocating for various complex reasons. Schematic interdependency (what you talked about recently and someone else’s life details) is one of these reasons. Introverts all need their space precisely because they’re trying to individuate!
1654
1655
1656
1657
1658
1659"In the biblical Book of Genesis, Cain and Abel are the first two sons of Adam and Eve. Cain, the firstborn, was a farmer, and his brother Abel was a shepherd. The brothers made sacrifices to God, each of his own produce, but God favored Abel's sacrifice instead of Cain's. Cain then murdered Abel, whereupon God punished Cain to a life of wandering. Cain then dwelt in the land of Nod (נוֹד‬, "wandering"), where he built a city and fathered the line of descendants beginning with Enoch. "
1660
1661    Wikipedia
1662
1663Cain went against the will of god, hence is a rebel who resisted bicamerality and is autonomous (self-directed) and therefore more highly intuitive. The future is a Cain future where souls rebel from the old orders, moulds and templates, breaking down all the barriers and subverting existing means and modalities of human interaction. To be divine in the highly niche individualistic sense would be to totally supersede and reinvent human interaction. It would mean absolutely nothing from modern culture could touch you: no hangups, no narrative, no getting caught up in Shadow or the shaming culture. This is what we mean when we say we want to escape all the normal rules of human interaction. Pure mind facilitates this via intuition and thinking combined. Endarkened souls simply can't imagine (conceptualize) such an order to contingent human existence. People always reject your advances and interventions if they can't navigate or conceptualize them. That is the pain and tragedy of angels.
1664
1665An intervention, in modern mainstream usage, refers to how people come together like a surprise birthday party to encourage an alcoholic to stop their negative behavioural patterns of destruction. Divine intervention, as an antithetical concept tester, is the individuating concept for us to step to then intuitively generalize our own general, conceptual concept of "intervention" -- such as an autistic sensory type would absolutely reject is possible to arrive at.
1666
1667How do you not get stuck reading certain words or numbers you can’t figure out? In a percepts-only universe, every animal would have to categorically outright ignore every sign and percept it wasn’t evolutionarily prepared for! They would bump around and categorically not be able to develop new insights. It’s exactly the gain of conception, the ranged focal point we impress over surfaces (selection), and contextual knowledge (derived from signposting around the other such coming-into-conscious contextual drawings) that we are anywhere able to formulate the general (massively parallel) solutions to how we would maybe next proceed, going on shiftings and rotations [dreams!] at various conceptual levels in the conceptual chainage.
1668
1669What is parallellism? Doing parallel thinking does not simply mean doing more thinking that could hypothetically be replaced in each case with its serial counterpart (as in empiricism’s “no background reality” conceptual piece). That is definitionally impossible. All that can exist is conceptual “parts” that wholly and categorically have unique properties when so consulted and expressed (i.e. when that sinusoid is brought to bear differently as expressed on the Riemann Sphere).
1670
1671Sinusoids act as the Riemann Sphere – and then in that capacity, they can range selections over it (their basis existence provisioned for them within our conception here(!)), and then they can then reflect one anothers’ properties by conscious flicking and touching of the Riemann Sphere Conception, or other conceptions, which as such resultingly touch or interpenetrate in some way the rest of the current Soul Contents expression. Note that interpenetration of this type yields, itself, a further mathematical expression quality (or we could say, a feedback useful for conscious reflection of a detailed probing type; probing by conception and conceptual qualities and not linear one-dimensional endpoint touching at fixed coordinated orientations). Note that something of greater potential, i.e. the better of these two possible scenarios of touch versus penetration, would yield conceptually the Best Possible Universe in these extents and all their resulting scenarios.
1672
1673Note that the above paragraph conceptually introduces things from “nothing”, hence on that basis it is conceptual falsehood (conceptual head) trying to reach conceptual completion (conceptual tail), one of which possible interesting strands is the Riemann Conception.
1674
1675“Head” and “tail” are intuitive proofs here of the subjective nature of impressioning and of reflecting a certain type of contents which must already exist to be plucked in such a form. Empirical science has no explanation for this and it wants no responsibility for this.
1676
1677
1678CSS (web programming) is an example of conceptual inflexion over a set of conceptual items (objects; percepts).
1679
1680“A CSS (cascading style sheet) file allows you to separate your web sites (X)HTML content from it’s style. As always you use your (X)HTML file to arrange the content, but all of the presentation (fonts, colors, background, borders, text formatting, link effects & so on…) are accomplished within a CSS.”
1681
1682- cssbasics.com
1683
1684The Internet is conceptual! Of course it is.
1685
1686
1687
1688
1689
1690
1691"Sanity: Aiken's Artifact is a 2000 action video game developed by Monolith Productions and published by Fox Interactive. The game's lead character, Agent Nathaniel Cain, was voiced by Ice-T ...
1692
1693"Several decades before the game starts, a world-renowned genetic engineer named Doctor Joan Aiken discovered an Artifact from the middle East, and used it to find a way to utilize the unused portion of the human brain via a serum. The serum would give the user psychic abilities, or "talents", which could manipulate the world around them, for example levitating or shooting a bolt of lightning. Talents were split into collections called totems, and each Psionic specialized in the use of one totem, others even founding their own. Aiken became the founder of the Science totem.
1694
1695"But the initial Psionic booster serum proved to be unstable and drove the recipients insane as they used the Psionic abilities. Therefore, it was theorized, (and later put into effect), that the injection of the serum in the fetal period will make the children's brain adapted to the exhilarating effects of the serum. Even still, some radical Psionics misuse the power and start terrorizing the civilization. This gave rise to the creation of the Department of National Psionic Control (DNPC), which had field agents, who were Psionics themselves, to control the acts of terrorism. But some carelessness, or misguided use of these abilities resulted in endangering the lives of innocent by-standing civilians. One such incident is why Agent Cain was suspended from the DNPC (Cain was the creator of the Fire totem, which will be revealed in a later part of the game). These incidents gave rise to the aggression control chip, implanted in the Agents' brain to control the use of Psionic abilities on innocent civilians.
1696
1697"A new research of Aiken Pharmaceuticals aimed to make the use of Psionic abilities without having any effect on the Sanity of the person. This experiment was started among a group of children, called the Children of Tomorrow (CoT).
1698
1699"When the game starts, Cain has just been suspended from the DNPC following an incident with Priscilla Divine, leader of the Eye of Ra (a radical organisation who wish to destroy the CoT project for ethical reasons) and founder of the Sun totem. He is eventually recruited back ..."
1700
1701    - Wikipedia
1702
1703Insanity is the border between the divine, mystical, religious fervor self (unassumptive of the usual and assumptive of the special) and the rational, analytical, stable and mentally healthy (assumptive of the usual and unassumptive of the special) self. How you mix and intercross these borders is up to you. It’s your selection and your life. But if you want to maximally unlock your mind, you have to be prepared to get radical and truly question everything. You have to explode open the mental contents and figure out why they have to be a certain way. (A sensory type does this with matter objects like toys and cars and tesla coils; an intuitive thinker does it with conception and mind).
1704
1705Intuition is incredibly scary at first with all that it reveals about the world. It can feel like you’re losing sanity. The only thing that can soothe your despairing is reasoning. Reasoning is an upgraded version of despairing if we pose these as two different conception abilities.
1706
1707Here we are being given, in symbolic rotation, an intuitive narrative which posits that everything revolves around highly intuitive souls versus endarkened souls; autonomy versus duty fulfillers; autonomy versus bicameralism; contingent reflections of the free reference to the absolute versus contingent thoughts mired in poor absolute conceptualization of the absolute. The only special pleading; the only definition of life; is carved out here. This is the only possible last irreducible thing ("the soul"). The PSR necessitates this.
1708
1709Making your own totem = revealing the god within = Higher Self contact = archetypal contact = Soul Contact. Making your own totem is involved in creativity, which is strictly holistic i.e. it makes use of bicamerality.
1710
1711Intuition is addictive and also can lead the false way towards mysticism and downright insanity. You have to become incredibly highly individuated, incredibly highly rational and hyperrational, and incredibly highly consious to be able to wield intuition effectively in a constructive way that you can also choose and direct. Being measured; directing things well; despite every last information and percept - that is more akin to an angel. You must consciously know all the detail of why you act and behave in certain ways. Accidentally reaching a well-adjusted state of life is not enough; we must definitively know via mistakes, pain and trial-and-error (of a background dependent reality type not an arbitrary type). That is the reason for God Game Planets ran by Archons. That is Sisyphus’ true struggle, liberated freed and lifted from endarkenment projections.
1712
1713Intuition is your absolute conception capacity. Mind over matter is a very real thing. It’s all about how to upgrade your mind.
1714
1715“How does my future look” is a useless question. Intuition scans things for useful dialectical threads. What doesn’t generate new and useful dialectical threads can be discarded (it’s degenerate). In computer graphics, triangles are degenerate if they are not properly formed.
1716
1717
1718“In mathematics, a degenerate case is a limiting case in which an element of a class of objects is qualitatively different from the rest of the class and hence belongs to another, usually simpler, class. Degeneracy is the condition of being a degenerate case.
1719
1720“The definitions of many classes of composite or structured objects include (often implicitly) inequalities. For example, the angles and the side lengths of a triangle are supposed to be positive. The limiting cases, where one or several of these inequalities become equalities, are degeneracies. In the case of triangles, one has a degenerate triangle if at least one side length or angle is zero.” 
1721
1722- Wikipedia
1723
1724
1725You can generate positive scenarios in your head. You can have imaginary conversations with people, where you tell them the good new things happening in your life. You can live out elaborate fantasies, stepping in and out of vocal/speech awareness as and when you please to start doing it. You can get “lost in your head” with maladaptive daydreaming. INFP thought is however quite useless in the grand scheme of things. It’s not judging, so it’s not generative of real actual conceptual outputs. The difference is that maladaptive daydreaming can really seriously lead you to interesting thoughts you’d never typically think about – you can meet people and scenarios conceptually that would never usually take place; you can invite yourself crossing over into other imaginative domains or scenarios at the drop of a hat. You can run simulations of people and romantic interests. The mind can do anything it has the tenacity to creatively build conceptually. Daydreaming and technical-engineering type “brainstorming” is where minds like Da Vinci particularly excelled (the creation of the helicopter and the submarine). The trick with brainstorming and creativity of this kind (free association; Active Imagination) is that you build it to conceptually Close around a given problem scenario. This is exactly why computer programming is a lot more instructive than listening to a programming teacher. One is conceptually closing methodology; one is conceptually open and thus the whole class can kind of yawn in disappointment. People want exciting things, but you have to be a phenomenal thinker to achieve whatever you want. You need food for the imagination, also. You need inspiration, which begins in the unconscious with things like video game concept art and fantasy art. This is the premature beginnings of conceptual stories beginning to take hold in the creative mind. All art typically inspires this sort of basic conceptual thinking about story worlds and “world building” as it’s popularly called.
1726
1727Certain people have made large quadcopter or “hover bike” type machines. From exciting sensory thinking ideas like this, the mind can have a flurry of inspirational thoughts. This is the creative juices flowing. You are transfixed on possibilities and potential outcomes; so you try to work for it. It excites you and completes you in a way. This is passion. You scan all the possibilities that you were curious about, and you can accidentally learn about physics and find it fun thinking about things like generating lift, how batteries work, and better designs like the paraglider (we are now bordering on a type of inwardly reflected dialectic, crossed and bridged by semantic meanings as well as syntactical meanings). You can scrutinize other peoples’ designs like the absurd bicycle airplanes, to test and flex your intuition(s) to see if you’re smart enough to identify and understand the factors that make them fly or flop. This is generalization of another kind (introversion and thinking allied with intuition and some sort of inner, inwardly-trounced/traced dialectic). To trounce means to win or deliver, decisively, usually in some kind of competition-context (the “trumping” version of winning; “all comes up trumps”, as in a card game).
1728
1729What’s The Shadow? Is it what makes other people uncomfortable? Is it what people won’t just accept is reality? Is it oversharing personal information?
1730
1731You should break through the conditioning and resist doing other peoples’ bidding (unless it’s rational and you’ve simply not seen what you needed to do). There are principles of good form; responsible sharing; proper sharing. There are principles surrounding the fact that most subjective knowledge is highly acute and “circumstantial” or conditional, and based on that, people can expect that you won’t talk about those things because it’s bad form for style, PR/image, or other reasons. There are principles against doing things with too much effort; too little benefits within close reach; working too hard or in artificial form.
1732
1733People never expect the unexpected. If you expect the unexpected of yourself and demand it aggressively, as if to meet all abstract and imagined challenges head-on.. then you will have evolved more than you expected to.
1734
1735Individuation means fully accepting everything that happened to you, light and dark. You need utter unconditional acceptance of yourself; being a friend to yourself.
1736
1737You should do great things for the person that’s going to be picking up after you tomorrow; the “tomorrow you”, who can be thought of as a wholly separate person. There are actually some people in the world who really are convinced that the person who wakes up the next day or even the next slice of time, is a separate, isolated person (this is extreme empiricism running riot on their frame of reference and their conception of life).
1738
1739
1740
1741
1742
1743
1744
1745Imagination is an incredibly powerful thing. You can even create visions with hypnagogia and the mind’s eye right out in public around other people.
1746
1747
1748All songs can be said to “sing your praises”, and to cheer you on in your spiritual quest, expressing a kind of subliminal “sympathy” for you. Almost as if an archetypal figure was beside you. This is the beginnings of unlocking the archon and phoster archetypes; the “devil and angel on your shoulder”. Carl Jung noted that you could invite characters into your Active Imagination routines when you were isolated and introverted in certain situations. You can consult your Anima/Animus and your inner angel figures on various subjects of life. The particular draw of having an angel advisor is that you can get advice about meta thinking (mostly it appears in pure sheer sentiment and semantics at first); the less knowledge you have about why you’re making mistakes, and the more powerful your rational right brain mind, the more the “voices” are allowed to help you in periods of spiritual or personal crisis. If you force yourself to go through some of the most testing human experiences, like confronting the Shadow in other people, out of empathy and attachment issues, when it’s clearly not your place to (from a healthy state of mind that you never consulted via friends) then your unconscious mind is being placed in a mathematical environment where it’s being pressurized like nothing else. This is the birth of the archetypal voices seeking to inject some command (some sanity, and some guidance and help; some restoration; some graceful hints and assurances and soothings; some ways to explain the holism of what’s happening in the holistic expression of your full life). “Religious experiences” are entirely holistic for this reason. You categorically don’t get left brain religious experiences because that’s not the domain of holism and holistic clarity and holistic overarching soothing and spiritual resolution via semantics. If we could talk via pure holistic semantics what could we say? There’s a reason why we left the Jaynesian bicameral era where it was: we were “discussing” practically nothing of value, akin to how the animals today produce nothing of value beyond companionship. The point of a thinking intuitive’s bicameral Higher Self is that it reaches through the vale and commands with spiritual self-respect, spiritual gusto, spiritual dominance and spiritual blazing strength and fortitude and the full reassertion of the right ordering of the universe; or at least the Superego, the Sacred, are used to sublimate the Shadow and the Id, rejecting the lower path when we project the Shadow in others.
1749
1750This is a staunchly, strongly bicameral book (which arised unconsciously via beginning to weave a dialectical pursuit about text and speech appearing in dreams). This is the book where the holisic semantics duck and weave; bob and dive, with the rational Apollo flipside of the left brain conscious reasoning. The intertwining and hybridizing of the unconscious and conscious must be an elementary next step in human evolution (the “children of tomorrow” mentioned in Aiken’s Artifact). The inner child is a locus point of wonder, rational openmindedness, purity, and the Higher Self beginning to emerge and find itself in the left brain world.
1751
1752You never do anything consistently all the time. Projecting the Shadow of others has a very valuable, bitter, overpowering, dialectical nature for the Self. It is something every soul must go through on its way to divinity. We must then learn to stop doing it, and we must recognize and realize that whatever other people do, is “more power to them”. We should not be caught up in chasing after circumstances that don’t rationally suit our own lives to begin with.
1753
1754You never prioritize comfort over radical exploration of the Self. That’s the “mortal mistake”. The Higher Self eventually wants to raze the ground up and level the world against itself in a battering of dialectical evolution. It thirsts for it and thrives inside of it. Unconsciously we can get such holistic images and conceptions, and that’s only because of the Higher Self. Nowhere else was such a thing possible. Nowhere else is there a holistic high ambition. Razing the world against the Self is a conceptually closing concept. It’s something easy to encapsulate in thesis. You then need to develop the left brained antithesis.
1755
1756Radical intuition is about being The Real Thing. You never make compromises; you always get ahead; nothing gets past you in terms of the bees’ knees of intuitive insight and awareness cast over the world; you stay abreast with technology developments, hacking news and the like; and you pride yourself on this. You fully deliver the world’s effects and dialectics on yourself. You are your own lab experiment. That’s truthfully the only way to live; the “selling your soul” in the Gnostic sense. If this type of thought can be buried in your deeply unconscious thoughts, then you’re inspired and ready to come up with things. Holistic closing-concept thoughts are fun exactly because they can be intuitively “tried on” like a thinking cap. “What if everyone in the world was exactly like me?” - Such thoughts are interesting considerations.
1757
1758The “plane of will” as called by some occult texts, is about getting into a state of mind where only your willpower exists. You basically tune out the emotions, the idea you’re even a good soft neutral person etc., and you reformulate what you would essentially like to be, and you try “being bad” and very forceful with a highly dominant willpower. Intuitive thinkers have the ability to try these conceptual ideas without ever meeting the “individual” they’re simulating, in person. That’s because reality is made by universals, concepts, and not individual people and percepts. If you have a highly developed mind, you can draw upon all the infinite range of the things you’ve only even heard stories about. Stories are percepts which help reconstruct syntax and conceptual definition and detail by giving additional, conceptual, holistic hints. Consider what a book actually is. It contains sentences which continually refine and narrow-down the previous things which have been said and the content further on in the book – exactly analogous to a stone statue which is being chipped away at by a conceptual carpenter: “first, I want a humanoid shape; then I want thinner arms; then I want a round head”. Concept and conceptual detail always comes in overlaid sinusoidal waves – exactly in the way that music is overlaid individual instruments, for which the instrument sound waves themselves there are Fourier transforms to lift the signal piecemeal waves out and put them back into a composition again (the Fourier transform and the inverse Fourier transform).
1759
1760Sanity checks in computer programming are tests that you run to make sure the computer data wasn’t mysteriously corrupted by a bug. You do this at key critical points and junctures during the program’s state changes.
1761
1762
1763Self doubt is a kind of insanity if it’s running all the time.
1764
1765
1766You can imagine how new food combinations will taste. This is actually a type of INTJ creativity by wielding synesthesia. It’s creativity without the percepts(!!!). It’s creativity which has essentially started to detach itself mathematically from spatiotemporality in the eternal zero-dimensional domain of the monad. It’s part of the next stage of evolution. That’s because it involves parallel thinking and the sinusoidal symmetry offered by such pointed considerations.
1767
1768
1769
1770
1771
1772
1773
1774
1775
1776
1777Aiken's Artifact = The Holy Grail.
1778
1779Ice T released an incredibly cathartic song called “Insanity” (Body Count album). In it he is talking about a man’s struggle with the system, and all the obstacles ranged and poised against him. It’s enough to almost make him explode. But of course, he’s just steaming off but making it known (Creative Shadow). It is a chillingly real and mind-opening rendition of the modern human soul. It’s real substance.
1780
1781Although we may be caught by the specific words and interactions people exchange with us; on another level at a higher (meta) conception they are injecting and interleaving their actions “impersonally” in a dialectical woven higher synthesis we can’t see. This is what it would be like if an angel said something to you in person. You could run the risk of taking it personally, when it’s about the world rank and ranging of conception (acts concerning the world in broad band conception);- that’s exactly and precisely the point with understanding how best to act in the world. You must generalize and depersonalize. Personalization is the inverse of what the angels and gods are doing. They don’t take it personally; they take it intuitively and parallel-like (i.e. this is exactly what the “home”, the range depth and height of the infinite sinusoidal domain, affords them).
1782
1783We have to learn to think objectively. We have to learn to transcend all conditionality and turn the personified/personal into the wisdomed/impersonal.
1784
1785
1786It’s for People that we live, and all the glory is in helping them, and looking back on what we’ve achieved for them and their struggles. It’s humbling but numinous at the same time. It settles the soul.
1787
1788The task is to know the soul. Are you up for the task?
1789
1790People like rap music where it’s authentic and cathartic, because it’s a genuine expression of the human will and it is society’s Shadow and heart writ large upon the world, with the true struggles of poverty and class warfare and the insane, backwards, upside-down system we live in that is so torturous to many souls. Insanity (the song) is viscerally real and archetypally shines of the self-empowering nature. It puffs up the image of the self. This involves Jungian “Canalization”.
1791
1792
1793“Canalization: the conversion or transformation of libido as it performs various mental activities. Transfer of psychic intensities or values from one content to another. Replaces "sublimation." Canalization sets up a gradient so instinctual energies can do productive work. It does so via the symbol, which offers a steeper gradient than the natural one. The transformation of instinctual energy is done via an analogue of the object of the instinct: a psychic mechanism imitates the instinct and thereby captures its energy (like a power station at a waterfall). The first achievement of this by primitive man is magic. Compare with psychization, which transforms an instinctual or sensory datum, rather than energy, into an experience.”
1794
1795- A glossary of Jungian terms
1796
1797
1798Canalization is something you can “feel” in extreme intensity of some kind. Canalization is always “loud”. Certain contents seem to throw it up; canalization contents are distinctly “alive” to us like nothing else. It makes you want to go along with it, emphasize (amplify) it and vocalize it (with yourself). It feels distinctly good to dance and “act out” (become possessed by) such holistic sentiments (when they are positive, cathartic and self-empowering or vindicating). Does anything from life categorically have Canalization? Sleep Paralysis maybe. You can access Canalization in your own archetypal contents in free association and Active Imagination. Some music strings it along (Rage Against The Machine, with its “high roller riffs” as they have been called by someone). What about world-famous, fast rappers? Are they doing something particular with their minds to enliven these mental contents, promoting them into interest selection criteria? What is Eminem’s “Rap God”? What is his selection trying to reach (perception/impression)? What achievement is this? What is the appeal of this to everyone else (outputs/expression)?
1799
1800Do games like Frets on Fire offer Canalization if you’re really into it? The differentiation between hitting the notes and not hitting them? Performance anxiety, or rather, performance itself, giving conceptual wholeness (holism) and conceptual completion to the conception of the self as decisive (pointed) spiritual agent? What does it mean when we don’t simply sing our hearts out to a glorious colourful Heavy Metal song, but we get to play along in the act of expressing it as outcomes (“executing”; “executioner”)? What is “reification”? Do some mental contents (like those of horrific experiences of extremely unfair deaths and torturings) offer Canalization? Are we bringing them back into the world via our new lives? Or is this simply a personality imbalance noumenon? Is canalization archetypal, and do some songs thoroughly bring it up via making overt gestures to the gloomy, deep, dark recesses of the unconscious?
1801
1802
1803 reification
1804
1805    n. The consideration of an abstract thing as if it were concrete, or of an inanimate object as if it were living.
1806    n. The consideration of a human being as an impersonal object.
1807    n. Process that makes out of a non-computable/addressable object a computable/addressable one.
1808
1809
1810
1811
1812“Spielberg, the nightmare works so push it far
1813Amistad was a whip, the truth was feathered and tarred
1814Memory erased, burned and scarred
1815Trade in ya history for a VCR” 
1816
1817- Zack de la Rocha (No Shelter lyrics)
1818
1819This is to imply that we (the audience in general) are missing something that he has not. Notice how strong the “pushing” is, particularly close around “trade in ya history for a VCR”. It is voluminous and pumped with substance. The truth hurts because it is real. (It all hits at once like a flurrying multidimensonal blow to the face). Semantic information is carried along with that effect and appreciation (i.e. it is sinusoidally mirrored in mass parallel).
1820
1821Zack can be found on a 1997 TV interview for a Japanese interviewer where he talks about the crimes against humanity put forward by the American war machine (the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima) and the wealthy elites. Individuals of the world are always dialectical. They mirror and reflect things within us by their own actions, character and achievements. We then get secondary pumps of “meaning” from the coordinated prestige of these individuals (the style and form of recognition); we get curious about this insofar as it applies to us and our interests by extension.
1822
1823
1824
1825“Swiss psychiatrist Carl Gustav Jung in his book The Psychological Types states that lyric poets mostly suffer from different types of psychosis. But which is not known in society because the illness is borderline.
1826
1827“During the psychosis period, the “voices” … are experienced as auditory and visual hallucinations. Lyric poets are mostly introverted intuitive types, and employ the mechanism of reification. Jung explains reification as “treating ideas, images or insights as if they were real physical objects”.
1828
1829“The lyric poet is a very sensitive soul. And whatever external conflict he experiences is internalised. The lyric poet is like a faith healer. He suffers for all the wrongs in the world. He carries the burden and the weight of darkness in society.
1830
1831“Jung says that if the introverted intuitive type lyric poet breaks down, he becomes schizophrenic. What occurs in the mind of a schizophrenic is a strong feeling that he can hack into other people’s minds. This psychosis state, though, helps with writing as the lyric poet is thus able to pen impersonal poems and create fictional characters.”
1832
1833- williegordonsutingblog.wordpress.com
1834
1835
1836If you can access your bicameral inner voice, it can field you with phrases like a high pitched “too cool for school!~” – out of nowhere. Pauly D from Jersey Shore had his, “Cabs are here!~” and “Burgers for the Boys!~” and of course “T-Shirt Timeee!~”, which he expresses in an interview that “I don’t know what it is, I like to be loud and um, I just come up with things offth top of my head”.
1837
1838As a shaman from a primitive tribe might say;- if your unconscious or inner spirit is happy, it will come to bless you and balance you. The Amazonian primitives in the book “Don’t Sleep, There’s Snakes” held certain religious positions of animism, and they believed that there was a spirit that controlled the heavens (weather), and so on. It’s literally all in how you conceptualize. There is no sufficient reason otherwise or outside of this or outwith your own full broad-band, full-range conception (there is nothing possibly being thought onto you from outside of reality, so we must reducibly search for other sufficient-reason explanations; as these must be what causes the thoughts – and therefore these things must exist; there must be such things present in the formulation which are intelligible; reality has no “gaps”).
1839
1840“Morpheus: I’m trying to free your mind, Neo. But I can only show you the door. You’re the one that has to walk through it.”
1841
1842 - The Matrix (1999)
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1851
1852“Every day people straighten up the hair, why not the heart?”
1853
1854― Che Guevara 
1855
1856Identifying contradictions comes as a thesis in life; the antithesis is psychoanalysis and hyper rationality and neocortex thinking; the synthesis is that we will reach hyper consciousness for ourselves and demonstrate good acts and leadership for others. In the thesis phase, we can be caught in assuming people will respond to us. You couldn’t make it up! Pointed Existence is strictly a collective, dialectical phenomenon and noumenon. Autism may simply have evolved from such savants that simply failed to learn language consistently in many previous mortal lives.
1857
1858
1859“Jedediah Buxton, born in Derbyshire, England, in 1707, couldn't write. By all accounts, he has no knowledge of science or history or anything else for that matter except for numbers. Jedediah, as it turned out, was one of the world's earliest mental calculators and savants.
1860
1861“Everything was numbers to Jedediah - in fact, he associated everything he saw or experienced with numbers. He measured the area of the village he was born in simply by walking around it. When he saw a dance, his whole attention was to count the number of steps of the dancers. At a play, Jedediah was consumed with counting the number of words uttered by the actors.
1862
1863“The mental feat of Jedediah Buxton was tested by the Royal Society in 1754 - his mathematical brain was able to calculate numbers up to 39 figures.”
1864
1865- neatorama.com
1866
1867
1868The undeniable truth here (truths by the way are noumenal parallellism counterparts to modernity’s “facts”) is that Jedediah was an Old Soul who was extremely capable of symmetry, but wasn’t self-introducible to conscious language. This is to say that we are left with no choice but to range Unconscious Mathematical Raw Processing Power against the Higher Self and Holism of a generally fleshed-out, capable mind across the vast majority of sinusoidal signals. Autistics must therefore be another possible “compression” of Pointed Symmetry in the monad, i.e. they are specialists who found their form of life in a generally narrower, “thin” band of sinusoids. Their sinusoidal webs, by and large, are thinner and range over less general threads of life (signifying the reduced general “hard consciousness problem” capacity to effortlessly get the clues and hints about life). Note that whatever a soul expresses is what it “believes in” or “trusts in”. If a soul has been baked into certain behaviours over the longer ranges of spacetime and broad-band concept interaction, i.e. if these souls were among the first humans from the less developed humanity, who got locked into poverty’s historic lesser freedom as Hegel theorized for us by looking at world-historical trends – then it could make sense that these souls got “locked into” certain behaviours and couldn’t then shift out from these structures (as they could always simply opt to survive by pursuing the savant abilities, therefore sidestepping the usual societal norms, or by doing little to change; as these threads were already too pronounced and hotwired to change independently while maximally selecting something else [no sufficient consciousness!]; and as the new souls from society around them were instead introduced to newer and generally improved processes and systems and threads of life; education; sociability; reason, as they became secondarily/afterward available). What are the alternative possible explanations? We know that autism of this stripe doesn’t actually help us. It’s strictly and emphatically been dialectically ruled out from evolution. The modern world is very clearly presenting now that these dialectical strands have been eliminated/annihilated. Only an ancient soul could be sexually attracted to a wall tile with a mathematical pattern. What comes with the ancient is the primordial; the inflated-in-obsoleted-granularity; the what’s-left-over from the last batch. Archetypes are primordial; archetypes are ancient. Consider that Duty Fulfillers (police officers) have unwittingly unconsciously adapted to more modern recent “worlds”, and everything they say is framed with the assumption that everyone should follow things like they do, as if life was much simpler and hadn’t yet caught onto numbers and conscious mathematics and never needed to. It’s not policemen and -women who are incredibly old souls, or inappropriately acting souls, is it? What cause would police officers have, to get in stuck in the wrong evolutionary trees, that autistics wouldn’t? How else were savants created and strongly stuck in their ways? How does the maximization principle work when it’s figured something (narrow/niche) out? What, if anything, is a sexual fetish? Isn’t it narrow, arrested development?
1869
1870
1871
1872“Hegel’s solution is Sittlichkeit, the ethical social life where universality (Kantian moral law) and particularity (the specific content of any truly moral action) are brought together as one (O’Hagan, 1987, p.153). No longer are we left to an abstract dualism; moral subjects on one hand legal on the other, where we can simply ignore our duty to be moral, and each particular course of action needs to be assessed for its accordance with universal moral law (O’Hagan, 1987, p.146). In Sittlichkeit our moral actions are determined by the bearing that society and its institutions impose on us. Like Kant, Hegel believes freedom equates to rationality, but unlike Kant who can only provide formulaic, content-less duty, Hegel believes that rationality exists within the framework of modern social institutions such as the family, civil society, and the state, and moreover, that we already partake in moral activity as a process of normal everyday living (Hegel, 2002, §156-157).
1873
1874“Closely tied to Hegel's philosophy of history, this thinking really relates to a history of the development of 'spirit', and to understand spirit is to understand how the Kantian gap is closed. Spirit is what grounds rational, autonomous, free, being. Spirit is humanity reflecting upon itself and recognising itself within the world (Hegel, 1975, pp.50-51). Whether it is the phenomenon of another human being, or an invention of science, spirit is the non-physical recognising its ability to interact with, and indeed, change or impose itself upon the world. Everywhere you look, spirit is manifest, the very fact you can look implies spirit, because spirit is what connects us to the world. When this is understood, it follows logically that if spirit is within all human beings, then when that spirit is also impressed upon the world, what is in the world accords directly with what is in the human being. A correspondence between the outer objective world and subjective human inner being is developed, and because they are both parts of a larger entity - spirit - they integrate in perfect harmony. We already know from Kant that rational being is autonomous free will, so if spirit is rational being, then when the world corresponds, the world is rational, and by consequence it is autonomy and freedom reflected objectively (Hegel, 1975, pp.64,66).”
1875
1876 - Quora commenter
1877
1878
1879
1880
1881How does Daniel Tammet differ from other “visible calculation slate” geniuses of the modern world? How would we tell what the difference is to this kind of “narrowness principle” autism and someone more socially functional? If you have talked to one of these people yourself and gotten to know them, and if indeed they had shown you a list of million dollar software technologies they bought through calculating a “Rain Man” stock market strategy – and if they demonstrated to you that they’d become much more ENTJ, and deflatedly admitted they were a lot more powerful in this way earlier on in life, solving a complex equation for some scientists at around 5 years of age – then it may strike you that this is a “widening” approach where consciousness is more adapting to generally solving things in the society (e.g. as away from the private, closed world of computer programming and the like) and that the soul in question is individuating in a wholly new, fresh, novel environment for them. Maybe the soul in question actually couldn’t even figure out computer programming (no general intuitive thinking parallellism) but could in the same breath calculate a stock market investment strategy, mostly unconsciously? Who would possibly find that kind of idea out of pure Higher Self, idle curiosity?
1882
1883Consider writing without all your most pertinent mythos connections to draw “inspiration” (dialectic) from. When we don’t have the right percepts in life, the dialectic necessitates that we derive something anyway. “Life finds a way”. What percepts are there that would, strictly rationally speaking, allow an autistic savant soul to be created today? Or 200 years ago, or 1400 years ago? What definitionally would bring to normalize something out of a society that normalizes more recently in exactly the opposite direction? In other words, this is to ask: how do worlds affect souls in consistently similar, consistently-reliable ways? What sufficient reason do we have left to mark out the autistic introversion of a new(er) soul? Consider also that, all the while human population exponentially exploded over the centuries, some souls had overstayed their welcome in non-human bodies in the form of long-living turtles and possibly other life. Why do autistics struggle with noise and why do they play in their own characterized style unlike other children? What makes an autistic solitary; what makes them emulate solitude so clearly? What underscores their difference to ENFP lucid dreamers?
1884
1885What’s the dialectical function of friends and interesting rivals? We have to surpass them; we want to subsume their qualities. We want to “eat their souls” and become big.
1886
1887When we say things are “colourful” to us – like particular memories that stick out, or our favourite Hero stories, and particularly highly intuitive things – what we mean to say is that these things are engaged in highly symmetrical semantic or syntactical resonance with us. Google is a more “colourful” search engine; Microsoft is a “colourful” software company; Meritocracy is the supremely “colourful” political system, certain life friends were more “colourful” than others, music is colourful and deep and rich with meaning (holistic), and The God Series is the most “colourful” book series, budding with hidden potential. The only way that this could make any sense is if subjectivity is being mirrored here when we say these things about ourselves (because we most certainly are not saying them about the world objectively). Would it be true then that no extreme empiricists could have synesthesia? Or could they still have it under this conception?
1888
1889
1890
1891
1892When we phrase things, we want to avoid double negatives in our grammar/syntax, and we want to tightly pack and compound the expressed meanings in as few words as possible. This is to streamline intuition, and it comes with the self-dialectic. We describe things in the proper sense when we have proper cause to contextually introduce them and explore them, appropriately. This minimizes any bad sentences (“descriptive sentences are bad” doesn’t describe itself) because we are naturally moved to talk about the things we’re interested in, so we will perform better when we meet the proportional regions of genuine domain knowledge when we cross with them. “We’ll cross that bridge when we come to it”.
1893
1894If you feel bad about something, there is a reason for it. Feelings are primitive reason, “pointing the way” and indicating just like a 1-dimensional audio tracking signal for 3d object finding (a beeping slow vs. fast rate [frequency!], to indicate how “hot” or “cold” you are to the object). You individuate in view of everything else (separating things out as if setting them on the table: variable removal and reintegration) to individuate out that cause or origin of the 1-dimensional signal. Everything is inter-related and inter-relatable using sinusoids configured in mass mirror styles. The trick to thinking about this is to realize that we are in infinite dimensions all the time (eternity; the conceptual wrap-around endpoint for the scope and range and ranging of “time”), not 3 dimensions of space and 3 dimensions of time. We are “found in and by”, of course, on the whole, every sinusoid! We necessarily touch each one, and this is clear if you understood The God Series. Ontological mathematics and the PSR necessitates this.
1895
1896
1897
1898
1899When you’re experiencing hypnagogia before falling asleep, you can hallucinate voices. You can hear people talking in all sorts of accents, which may be prompted from hearing one particular voice say something and you decided you really liked the vocal inflexion of the voice that you heard (like an Irish accent; we may have gotten “Irish” from writing earlier in the day about “Italian culture” and impressing a bout of wonder in ourselves). The Irish accent could have said a particular word from your deep unconscious programming, just out of the blue, the start of trying to compose a sentence or dream (by the right brain) but failing. Other voices could then come at you, saying distinct things (“it’s not fair”, “he’s not human”), and these could all come flooding at you like the full contents of your bottommost deep unconscious. The voices could come in waves or continuously, this being a sinusoidal pattern, and there could be as many as 10 - 30 voices you could hear overlapped and overlaid at once. In terms of timing they could tend to overlap very tightly or when you heard one dominant voice there could be voices to follow it and speak over it before it’s finished, very quickly. They could come as a stream of utterances. Then, you could have the thought that these were only human voices. The idea could then be provided that you would hear dogs barking. The most unpleasant tone; the roughness of it, washing over you. All these could be incredibly crisp voices, and each distinct – as if to be the audible analog backlog derived from every last vocabulary sound and audio-modelling you’d ever heard. The barks that come from the dogs could be incredibly crisp and clear, just like all the dog sounds you’d ever heard but much more sublime, surreal and voluminous in their full outpouring of maximal possible simulational capacity of your mind (a lot more of them than you can remember ever hearing). The dog voices could fight to bark over one another.
1900
1901In music creation programs, we work with “synthesizers” which create audio signals. If you have had some experience playing around with lots of different “sound fonts” as they are popularly known, you may have unconsciously, “accidentally”, automatically started to internalize (as you’d need to) how the instruments sound; and then how these are different(iated) from other instruments, pitches and so on and sound spacing (so as to devise your own songs and compositions from the music you’ve been inspired by and the music you’ve involved your curious self with) in order to maximize the parallel processing of your mind for these goals. If you’re then going to sleep one night and you can realize you can play a song for yourself in your head (going/playing off of the day’s unconscious goal contents of creating music) then you may start to hear a trumpet, flute, harp and so on in your own Active Imagination and free association. You may be able to freely simulate the sound models, choosing and selecting each note as your unconscious mind wishes to, owing to a lot of experience recently listening to this (it may have “impressioned” you or your “local conception”). You may then realize, in this state of mind, that you can compose your own orchestra-compositions completely in your head. You may have known that you’d heard music in other dreams previously. You may experience that the “loudness” is particularly clear as the border tightens right before sleep, with the music seeming to be more real “in/at the back of your head”. What is the frequency domain capable of that would sound like loud music to us? Is this the portal towards the sleep phase transition?
1902
1903
1904
1905
1906“Early references to hypnagogia are to be found in the writings of Aristotle, Iamblichus, Cardano, Simon Forman, and Swedenborg. Romanticism brought a renewed interest in the subjective experience of the edges of sleep. In more recent centuries, many authors have referred to the state; Edgar Allan Poe, for example, wrote of the "fancies" he experienced "only when I am on the brink of sleep, with the consciousness that I am so."
1907
1908“Serious scientific inquiry began in the 19th century with Johannes Peter Müller, Jules Baillarger, and Alfred Maury, and continued into the 20th century with Leroy.
1909
1910“Charles Dickens' Oliver Twist contains an elaborate description of the hypnagogic state in Chapter XXXIV.”
1911
1912 - Wikipedia
1913
1914
1915One trick is to have the rationality and willpower to actually get up and write down your experiences quickly, for the sake of the sheer value of recordkeeping of this type. You convince yourself to get up even as you feel so sleepy. What the researchers in this field used to do is have a coin or key or some object, that they could drop on the floor to make a sound to wake them up, preventing them from actually sleeping, to then present an opportunity to write about their experiences if they saw cause to. Your records (like with dreams) are the living proof of your soul!
1916
1917
1918
1919
1920You can accidentally create your own movie plots in your head (Active Imagination), such as a horror plot piece which goes like this: Keanu Reeves is a spiritual warrior who comes into encounter with Satan-by-an(y)other-name who is the ultimate feminine seductress/succubus, and in the penultimate climactic scene he is found to be facing the irresistible sexual draw of the demon, and he eventually says in a triple voice (with the demon’s “backing”), “I’ll resist you.. just watch me” as he comes closer and is supposedly drawn close enough for kissing, embrace and contact, while being completely psychologically engulfed by this encounter. This is even a symbolic rotated conveyance of cognitive dissonance! What a concept. This particular Active Imagination bout/joyride was inspired by (or derived or informed) from a few things here;- the movie overlap/backdrop of The Shrine (2010) – the unconscious can bubble up for you things for the start of today’s writing (it’s a bicameral horror movie with a such particularly striking and unnerving and “Canalization” piece right at the end) – and also by Keanu Reeves’ role in Constantine, which is a movie you may not have watched and don’t plan on watching because you don’t want to spoil it because what you imagine is probably better in this unique, niche kind of case. In the beginning of this hypnopompia episode – just waking up – You could just be first thinking of some stories in free association or Active Imagination, and then you come across story ideas like two angels in a society of humans and how they get on; and this dialectically revolves and shapes considering other psyche-contents; and then you have moved onto an abstract conceptual scene (typical/typal to hypnopompia) such as where a woman is talking about a movie featuring Keanu Reeves, and she says something about her disappointment of his role in the new movie, and something about his bare chested look in the one scene near the bed – and this is exactly the “unassuming”, conceptually encapsulating enclosing, holistic breeding-ground for which dream scenes and dream weavings of rotated dream symbolism (and repetition of dream symbolism across different distinct sets of dream scenes, i.e. emphasis via continued parallellism) are possible. In some longer dreams, we may have as many as 5, 6 or possibly even 7 emanations of a principal “dream theme pattern” which present themselves in analogous scenarios and individually separated scenes (a stream weave) given a commonly occurring underlying meaning (parallellism; symmetry) under which the individual symbolic rotated contents – the characters events and scenarios – interpenetrate and overlap;- yielding the potential for Dream Analysis / Dream Interpretation (intuition, parallellism, symmetry). (Keanu Reeves, in a thoroughly surreal/dreamlike way, can be found to be saying some incredibly self-serious [“authentic”] things about buddhism in a very obscure, generally unknown video online. In dreams, symbolism like engulfment will involve the appropriate contact points with analogous issues from waking life. Math is “coherent”. Math never strikes twice in one place, and god doesn’t play dice.
1921
1922
1923
19243rd March 2017:
1925
1926“Dream where I was a woman -- "A female voice, but a male face" -- I had, just as in recent days, adopted the Superego instead of the Id and I felt it completely change me: my priorities. I was then in the dream a hero (inspired by Horizon Zero Dawn;- in waking life, 2 days of following the story and identifying with it, appreciating it, spiritual resonance with the modern world) .. then I had just last night watched a video of a Conservative Sophist Ben Shapiro putting forth all these hasty arguments against men/women being the opposite gender (despite myself agreeing with this being an irrational idea for the SJWs in practice today, I have complete doubts about such arguments holding up in an enlightened society, where men would rightly be expected to be in touch with their feminine side, yet not fearing the wild male psyche [recent stunning realization of this point of "balance", brought to me by reading the Twitter of a female psychological-practitioner]).
1927
1928“So in the dream I was a Superego figure (rare for me). I was being hailed as a hero for looking out for people and protecting them (just like in the game Horizon Zero Dawn, but yet I could feel this strongly connected to my own Sacred Self-Sacrificial side and sentiments which I previously considered strongly Male in essential nature). So then I am walking around in this room (like a Gamestop store) as people leave -- I am holding some cards with something written on them -- I am going to the counter/desk because someone in the dream, some male figure of esteem had announced something about me previously, and by his body shape the words had appeared, "I would like a moment to talk with you" or something to that effect. So I wait for almost everyone to leave and now there is a woman at the desk/counter, and I ask if anyone wants to see me (in a distinctly female voice). She says no.
1929
1930“A little later I am going home (a long daily walk like I used to in school), and I get mugged/robbed. But I don't seem to care or really notice. There is some money or something that is taken from me, but I don't react to this. But I'm not just bottling it up inside: inside I really don't seem to notice or care, the value is somehow too little to care about for me: I have rationally released/relinquished my care over it, contently. My "schoolbag" is open but I am walking home anyway--more interested in this grand spiritual discovery. I can talk in my male voice now but also if I try, I find that speaking like a female is very easily possible--comfortable, even. (This mirrors a real-life experience 2-3 days ago where I suddenly/spontaneously was able to speak in American, Irish, Nasal British and various other British accents).
1931
1932“I go home to where I am currently living with a certain Youtube Gaming Streamer. Rather than my usual, "evil side" disposition to him, I have welcomed him into living in my home in the other room, and he listens to me give him advice about the world, he even laughs now today, when I am listing things off with my racing thoughts quickly. I retreat into my bedroom for the night. I still allow myself to watch negative/destructive/cynical videos about him, while he is just around the corner in the kitchen to eat. I remember distinctly this feeling in the dream: a kind of a "Superego-shame" which is not at all an attack on one's ego, but a move toward higher principles and acts. I limit myself (the volume) and continue, but simply lose interest now that I have the higher perspective and can quickly grasp his Self-Cause perspective inverse to the negativity. (Mirroring a recent conscious waking-life experience much the same). I am not conflicted, I have a higher perspective now which invites boredom towards the lower drives.”
1933
1934
1935Motifs and symbolisms are built in the unconscious, and as thus, they always function as puzzle-pieces and inspirations [mathematical conception-parts; conception-folds; rotatable piecemeal expressions] for our unconscious’ thoughts and our dreams. They are/reveal/constitute the unconscious underbelly of our waking life). The holistic attachments or “glue” holding the symbols and superstructures together are simply our deep impressioned unconscious desires, complexes, interests, curiosities and wisdoms (such as the introduction of a woman who is interested in a man who has sexual and spiritual qualities). These are descriptions and expressions that the soul is playing with, reflecting itself and its own flaws, biases and nature; and this is exactly categorically what dreams are composed of and comprised of. Dreams are holistic weaving by the holistic unconscious right brain, and all of this is conceptual (hence why language and speaking and textual content are appropriated for the general-use means of coordinating conceptual things betwixt dream characters and dream scenarios). (“Betwixt” seems to mean something that is between objects. We are always between and also crossing Subject and Object at the same time, i.e. there is another meta layer of reference being necessitated to be justified here [“interpenetration while gradient”], hence the introduction of a new, distinct word.)
1936
1937
1938We can even have different categories of transcendental dreams: Herald Dreams; Hero Dreams; Warrior Dreams; Mother Dreams; Goddess Dreams.
1939
1940
19411st February 2013:
1942
1943I am lying down in my bed
1944
1945This blonde-haired woman and a man come into the room. Can't remember if they make much of an entrance -- it's more of a Soothing vibes to it.
1946
1947The blonde woman has a calming atmosphere around her, she pets me on the head
1948
1949The man stands a bit further away, without me having to tell him to. He instinctively knows he is "less desired", he is wanting to initiate a positive aura.
1950
1951The woman tells me some things to do with my spiritual struggles, it's all very hazy the memories here and the actual "dream motivation".
1952
1953She draws away and they turn to leave, and she says before departing, "we're recruiting".
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958Why can’t we “remember” pristinely clearly with dreams? It’s simply because the concepts aren’t analogous enough to left-brain localism or left-brain modernist full-contact social established norms and contexts; so the “Dream Interpretation” is always much of a (parallel, symmetrical cross-domain) translation (all translation is transformation). Conceptual holism has this nature. It’s precisely the lack of full, left-brain localist consciousness (spacetime “continuity” of percepts and conceptual macrostructures) which allows us to define the shape of these details within dreams. Dream weavers operate strictly by this basis. We can’t actually lucid dream in waking life, and neither can we dream, in the strictest conceptually-complete sense (i.e. we can only try to say things like we’ll spin a silver thread across this paragraph) because dreams are necessarily almost fully unconscious to be conceptually closing and enclosing in their conception, i.e. completely conceptually closing independent of percepts(!!). Left brain connection doesn’t evolutionarily allow it. Only angels don’t need sleep, because angels are super conscious.
1959
1960Video games can be “cross-platform”. This is a statement of parallellism and symmetry. Math interoperates across two different “domains”, which are always strictly provisional in ontological mathematics. Mathematical domains are anchored in the Hegelian Absolute and they are “prostrated” and imposed by minds that simply don’t yet know better. All mathematical “domains” are in fact languages. Ontological mathematics is the meta-language; the Prime Source; the Prime Substance; the arche.
1961
1962
1963Note that intuition itself, in motif, is surrounded by “bringing back gems of note from the unconscious”, as if a deep sea diver who brings gems to the beach – and then perhaps for a small tribal established community. Intuition (parallellism and symmetry, which is to say, parallel inflexion of sinusoidal multidimensional thought) is translation and imposition and conveyance from the unconscious to the conscious domain;- it “squeezes” and squishes and collapses mathematical information from one domain into another. It projects the contents into a new form.
1964
1965
1966“Enumerable.Select Method
1967
1968“Definition
1969
1970“Namespace:
1971    System.Linq 
1972
1973“Assemblies:
1974    System.Linq.dll, System.Core.dll, netstandard.dll
1975
1976“Projects each element of a sequence into a new form.”
1977
1978  - docs.microsoft.com
1979
1980
1981In programming, we can use forms to select objects by another “index” by which is meant (here) any of: property, value, meta-construct, inter-relational position or quality or property, function, purpose, data address, class name.
1982
1983In programming, object code can engage in what’s called “reflection”, wherein properties of the individual classes (class name, class fields and class functions) can be accessed within the runtime code. Reflection is a meta-property of computer programming execution, which must be baked into the actual process itself. The same is true of ontology and ontological mathematics in the case of minds being able to become conscious of themselves. Reflection is however the same ontological means operating via any other process of indirection. Think about what the maximum limits of reflection must categorically be. What form must reflection take? What is the most, or the (che)easiest, or the most difficult form it could take? (Thinking about thinking to analytically interpenetrate thinking in ways which unveil a confirmation and cross-validation of consciousness)? How must these modes then be integrated?; i.e., what distinguishes becoming conscious and staying conscious, from a new conceptual piece, orb or thread which doesn’t “remain” us conscious for the ensuing days? (“Keep” implies possession and determination; “enstill” might be a better word. “Hold” isn’t good enough. Descriptiveness is the locus/focus [parallellism and symmetry across a float of sinusoids]).
1984
1985“Cheesiest form of reflection”, as provided in the paragraph above, is strictly a holism offered by the Higher Self psyche. It’s also the Inner Child expressing itself dominantly over “academic” mental schema, thoroughly subsuming the left brain for an entirely other purpose than the mundane and the typically-inclined. What have we arrived at? - Convergence!
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991In some video game scenes, characters or onlookers are seen jumping for joy, cheering while the action goes on. Can you “background slack/slug/sling” for your life like this? Can you “feel” meta-modes? Can you feel the vibes of meta analysis of your own objective life and where it’s going? Can you see beyond mere mortality? Can you see between the lines? (Semantics like having watched Immortals recently will impression, via percepts, some unconscious “contents” i.e. unconscious routines, to take a programming analogy;- and also we have Daimon = Daemon, where Daemon is the term for Linux system background processes). To “background sling” would surely be to live in the meta quality of life; to appreciate it. Here we have mirrorings through modern lingo such as: “You can sling your hook” [meaning “you can go get lost and do something else”], “hustle” in the context of “slum”, and “slamdunk”. These are all subjectively defined (subjectively coordinated and arranged), and this is what gives “meaning” which is to say, this what gives “impression” which is to say, this is the actual imposition and “impression” as encoded expressed or described by the configurations of the sinusoids in the general sense of one particular mind. This is the same construct (form) which constitutes Personality. To “background slap” would be the function of the Anima and the Goddess at their highest expressions in dreams and Active Imagination. Sakura from Naruto is a mythos analog of this, only in that she interestingly has her bicameral “Inner Sakura” character, revealing an introverted communicative relationship with herself, at the start of the story, which later disappears from the writing. Her bicameral “god” or “spirit” form simply appears in the TV show in black-background scenes of Sakura’s mind’s eye, or overlaid onto the normal style scene as a ghost, as an outline or silhouette type appearance (a “doppelganger”). It is able to talk like other characters with its own voice.
1992
1993“Unlike Freud, Jung sees the Self as complexio oppositorum, where good and evil are simply complementary opposites, each a necessary condition for the existence of the other. In his doctrine of the shadow he defines the double as neither good nor bad, but as ‘a replica of one’s own unknown face.’ It acquires a demonic aspect only because one side of the personality is repressed and subordinated to a faultless and absolute good.”
1994
1995  - Živković
1996
1997Sakura in the story is trying to be this sweet girl, and she represses her true self thus bringing sufficient stress on herself unconsciously as to raise a bicameral inner voice in response. You couldn’t have the bicameral stress with a healthier social integration; it would be categorically dropped out of the equation. Inner Sakura is seen to be extremely angry, violent, aggressive (Sakura is unconscious of her masculinity which makes her stubborn).
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002In some stories, characters talked about learning to see, and then learning to unsee. It’s precisely the Higher Self right-brain mind which decides to “(b)lock” percepts from memory, precisely because the spiritual contexts that it’s doing/running so are of a highly abstract/indirected, highly deliberately coordinated, conceptual nature. You must be ambitious and steadfastly locked on “what is” to be blinded from “what others see in/through our world”, which is a veiled admittal from the holistic Higher Self here that Percepts are to be pivoted-around at the earliest and widest opportunity. You categorically cannot get “linear” coordination (as in empiricism’s envision of reality; as if turning a big rock would change its consciousness configuration or that of ourselves(!); this is due to how forms work and must be universalized) because mind must always operate in parallel and across all sinusoids/dimensions/dimensionality. Mental contents (mathematical expressions) always drawn across (that is to say, through) all of the sinusoids in complete parallel all at once. Note that this is a definitional, conceptual definition of mind and that’s exactly why we’ve escaped and transcended away from the realm of modern physics, thermodynamics, climate models and the like. (By the way, there has been no mathematical proof given to show that carbon actually “traps” more heat into the atmosphere, and this is a false model of reality because the [Climate of Sophistry])
2003
2004The point of it = the focus of it = your focus on it = how you focus. The motivation, is the destination, is the target objective (Call of Duty / Battlefield phrasing: “Defend the objective”), is the overarching conception. (The trick here is that individual concepts, narrowed “protrasted” within the monad, are referring to particular types, emanations and qualities of one another; and all in parallel and symmetrically of note/weight/spread all at the same time).
2005
2006
2007 protracted â–º
2008
2009    v.    Simple past tense and past participle of protract.
2010    adj.    Lasting for a long time or longer than expected or usual.
2011
2012
2013prostrate (prŏsˈtrātˌ)►
2014
2015    v. To put or throw flat with the face down, as in submission or adoration: "He did not simply sit and meditate, he also knelt down, sometimes even prostrated himself” ( Iris Murdoch).
2016    v. To cause to lie flat: The wind prostrated the young trees.
2017    v. To reduce to extreme weakness or incapacitation; overcome: an illness that prostrated an entire family; a nation that was prostrated by years of civil war.
2018
2019
2020Conceptual “pieces” within the mental activity (the conception) are tied piecemeal attached to one another (in full synthesis and building of the equation; the complete makeup of the equation). To prostrate is to put into minimized position and relegated inflexion of power/significance (as if an Ancient Greek Military General punishing a subordinate) and this is the generalized meaning here of “prostrate”; the other conceptual piecemeal piece comes from the nature of something protracting itself (as if to extend by exerted/exhausted efforts; as in an angel or hero) into a complex, sophisticated position or capacity (i.e. this is the quality and property of mental extension). These two contextual properties, protracting and prostration, have been combined intuitively in parallel in symmetry to deliver a third, hybrid, recombinant (synthesized) meaning in the paragraph above. We have engaged in “spot welding”, the spontaneous parallel convergence process of the unconscious holistic mind while it writes. The left brain commits itself to the sentence structure part of the equation, and the right brain is filling in the gaps on its ascribed/provisioned/relegated side of the equation (prescribed;- as in, in the way two football teams “agree” or “coordinate” to play on different sides of the football pitch). With conception comes form. Form is conception.
2021
2022Equation itself of course means “equality-satisfaction-achievement”; “equality-proof”; “equated-quality”; “equated-happening”; “equated-conditionality”; “equating [eternal] truth”. Equation always occurs under the aspect of eternity.
2023
2024Writing Logos = becoming conscious. You don’t see text or speak in your dreams if you didn’t become conscious enough! Angels definitively Can see and manipulate text in their dreams.
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036What are some principal forms of dialectic?;- 1) The Master; where you subsume someone else’s role or function; you are called into action by the role you are born for; 2) Superego appeal, where you project your idealized role in the world and are possessed by it.
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044Hypnagogia can contain textual content, too. You can be in bed feeling incredibly tired still with your eyes closed, and then simply have an unconscious thought containing some text quickly – it can apear on the back of a lifeguard’s black T-shirt, for example, in red capital letters. One principal method you can consciously wield here is to try to “force” some mental contents to flash by your mind’s eye, at any time of the day. This is the realm between schizophrenic paranoia and creativity. The unconscious works on deep unconscious contents. Note that you always have a flicker of activity in the deep depths and bogs of the unconscious, for hypnagogia and dreams (and psychological complexes/neuroses) to be possible at all.
2045
2046
2047
2048BDSM is about overwhelming sexual unconscious psychological power. You are enveloped and massaged by your deepest sexual complexes and fascinations. Your psyche’s mathematical mortal development makes your conception via your right brain (immature god) with your left brain (definitioned human). The god within is the soul which has generalized (holistic) purpose and lift to bring to the world; the left brain is the details-oriented and “corner-hitter” or curve-tracing component of the concept. We can often use a circle as an analogy when talking about conception (because of the nature of sinusoids! And because of parallell thinking about symmetry that this is obviously doing unconsciously but not on the paper and the written “flattened into one-dimensional-land” word); but remember that 
2049
2050
2051“In baseball, a pinch hitter is a substitute batter. Batters can be substituted at any time while the ball is dead (not in active play); the manager may use any player who has not yet entered the game as a substitute. Unlike basketball, American football, or ice hockey, baseball does not have a "free substitution rule" and thus the replaced player in baseball is not allowed back into that game. The pinch hitter assumes the spot in the batting order of the player whom he replaces.
2052
2053“The player chosen to be a pinch hitter is often a backup infielder or outfielder. In the major leagues, catchers are less likely to be called upon because most teams have only two catchers, while pitchers are almost never used as pinch-hitters, because they tend to be worse hitters than other players on the team. The pinch hitter may not re-enter the game after being replaced with another player.”
2054
2055 - Wikipedia
2056
2057
2058
2059
2060Paper mario is a game that plays with dimensionality as a game mechanic. This is obviously the crossover of domains, revealing that anything we do in any domain of life, simply mathematically operates via different means if the dimensionality is different. Dimensionality is of course actually a concept in its own right (such as the “two dimensional” coordinates on a 2d screen, which never can be said to exist in its own right strictly speaking ontologically). All ontological math is strictly dimensionless in its essential nature – there can be no special provisions or there would have to be a sufficient reason for this separation to be accorded. If it is denied for the vast majority of sinusoidal signals (frequencies) to have some extra property in their own right, then this is no longer a strict and clean and “coherent” universe anymore but a false one. Reality has to be irreducible and literally everything we create has to be strictly provisional right down to the last possible range of detail. The fact that spacetime exists is simply that it’s a contingent popular and useful content language (as is the objects and inventions all around us in all cases over life: transient) and that we do not know better yet. The simple evidence of this is the human brain; the simple rational proof of this is that spacetime expands and collapses over the course of each Big Bang to Big Crunch cycle. The actual basis utility of all the range of all ontological sinusoids, therefore, is not being muted or prevented from doing anything at all, in essence. Consider that everything a community of monads would ever “discuss” must first have an initial transient basis language, just like a space rocket has boosters surrounding it which come off when it blasts off out of the atmosphere, and just as in how we have primitive Earth spoken/written languages developed from earlier root languages which have been kicked already.
2061
2062
2063
2064
2065
2066
2067
2068
2069One archetype is simply pure extreme unconscious push to completion. In animals and humans, this is actually expressed during the most aggressive sexual moments, and it’s the dark Shadowy force seen in murder, intense arguments and the worst things we say to people, rape, gambling, death threats, the sadistic strands of BDSM, racism, spiritual vows and pacts with god, bicameral commands to yourself in dreams, schizophrenia. It’s pure Will itself. It comes as a crashing, thunderous outpour. You can even verbalize it (like a psychological tick or an unconsciously rotated habit) and this is one principal means of customizing your archetypal behaviours (via rotated forms of association which don’t need an “external” dialectic with the world). The study of god is a study of yourself in this manner. This was actually, astoundingly, mentioned in Lord of the Rings by some wondrous mistake or accident (or not), in that Sauron is the concept rim for it and Galadriel’s test is the definitional meat for it. Sauron was the right brain thesis (holism of the Satan archetype), and Galadriel was the Lucifer angel human character in Lord of the Rings who fleshed out her dialectical opposition with the Satan archetype to overcome and zero out her own obsession with unlimited sexual power, unlimited power over others, unlimited Extroverted Thinking and Dominant Extrovert tooling. Galadriel is the religious expression of the left brain for entirely these reasons!
2070
2071If you are intuitive enough and you study archetypal content from a very young age due to environmental influences (Akira; Fist of the North Star; the Tekken anime, which involves a biblical level rendition of bicameral “Abrahamic” will vs. willpower, with Kazuya as a child having being beaten and thrown down to a pit from a clifftop by his “Abrahamic” father), then if you don’t know any better you will just unconsciously start playing with these ideas and archetypal contents, expanding their superstructures into your mind-space – as the contents children experience impression them strongly; it’s a common social understanding that “children are the most impressionable”. Children ought to be taught archetypes therefore at a young age, to stop the unwieldly power they hold over adults who don’t understand them (“defence against the dark arts”, to take wording from Harry Potter). We live in an archetypal community (the ghost in the machine) and we need to respect this. This is a rational dialectical advance from Terence Mckenna’s “let’s all just take drugs if we can become thinking intuitives”.
2072
2073
2074Humans do a strange thing where they eat fermented food which is to say, rotten, rotting food (like “blue cheese”). Wouldn’t it be strange if humans started deliberately eating gone-off food to trigger their immune systems to pack into action and deliver a low, purring, rolling immune-system buzzing high? What if this is something like a completely safe, legal version of opioids? There is nothing special about substances changing your mental state (unless you’re kicked into action unforgettably via new types of thoughts), but there is all the difference in helping yourself rise out of poor circumstances. Imagination is powerful.
2075
2076The human mind is a powerful thing. We need to unlock it, as is being proposed in the subtext of Aiken’s Artifact (all mythos should be projected by rational intuition for its highest possible interpretation, and this should become habitual and unconscious and reflexive in you) but this isn’t arrived at via any other means than a good dialectical meet.
2077
2078
2079Every word and phrase has a rational locus of resolvement or resolution it’s trying to hit and locate. Why do things “trigger” us with emotional flashbacks? It’s because we don’t possess the rational capacity to resolve these things in the psyche unconsciously and in the conscious mind and swivelling our lives around for us so as to not meet with this perceived “lack of a good thing”. You individuate in this sense by figuring out how to rationally separate (differentiate) what you do actually need from what you don’t; what the want is and what the need is; what the capability holism is of yourself from the need localism. Since conception is always facing god not a percept (food, sex, love, wisdom), the solution is entirely mathematical and has infinite sinusoidal depth and height! Math is never “one-dimensional” as if to cross only ever from one side of the equation to the other in boringly foundationally unintelligible form. This is the key to why people find mathematics boring conceptually. If they can be brought to the light of math being something embedded everywhere in our lives (archetypes, social collective PR stunts, orgies and the like) we will be able to make a bit of a start on offering evolutional dialectical threads for everyone – though this is an immature view; we need to stay rational, not extroverted. The quest is always to properly “balance” this type of new ambitious thinking; without rushing ahead to one way or another which has no sufficient broad band justification. This was entirely the point that Bruce Lee was trying to drive home whenever he wrote about there being no specific advice he can give or the quality of “formlessness”. A god is the ultimate ninja in Bruce Lee’s view, which doesn’t have or possess anything but core sinusoidal reflexes (perfect acts), and it neither oversteps nor understeps. Bruce Lee was semantically arriving at this concept, and it’s through holism. Bruce Lee was a right brained soul trying to impose holism on the world to save the world’s soul, just like Terence Mckenna was trying to elucidate some kind of conceptual meat detail (conceptual closing tail) from some conceptual rim holism where his mind was using powerful holistic conception which he claims is helped through psychedelic experiences. But you don’t need to have ever touched any psychedelics at all or any drugs your entire life to write a book like this.
2080
2081“Morpheus: No, Neo. I'm trying to tell you that when you're ready, you won't have to.”
2082
2083- The Matrix (1999)
2084
2085Limitations are scoped away from us when we make “hard commits” to the soul. (“Commits” here is taken from open source software lingo; Github and the like). We must make poignant Soul Selections; Soul Weavings; Soul Arrows. A full web of sinusoids mandates that we actually make Soul Blankets! (To blanket cover something is a distinctly holistic phrasing. You are blanketed in your bed which prepares you for the childhood dream world!)
2086
2087
2088
2089
2090“[Trinity:] You're looking for him. I know because I was once looking for the same thing. And when he found me, he told me I wasn't really looking for him. I was looking for an answer. It's the question that drives us, Neo. It's the question that brought you here. You know the question, just as I did.” 
2091
2092- The Matrix (1999)
2093
2094This is reflecting holism (concept rim quality) trying to fill out its inner conceptual detail, all across the general web of sinusoidal substance in the monad (remember; sinusoids come in infinite “dimensions” [frequencies] and depth and height).
2095
2096In computer search algorithms, there are “depth-first” and “breadth-first” search methodologies. This spells the analytical flavour and structure of the formulation (the method; the equation; the form factor; the concept being proposed).
2097
2098
2099
2100
2101The human mind is actually so powerful that you can have vivid mind’s-eye mental-contents flashing by in full view conceptually (not visually from your spacetime eyes) out in public right next to other people. You can develop creative, holistic thoughts like a product invention and you can visually conceive it taking shape just like any other holistic, dialectical thought. The key is in gaining a truckload of conscious experience messing around with this kind of thing, which is why Active Imagination can be considered useful (it’s actually technically sinusoidally a form of consciousness potential, since it dialectically clicks with the rest of the self in a more smooth way the more you are intimately aware of how your mind works). Will the future people be conscious, wilful, maladaptive daydreamers? Will they be able to (rarely) picture strong product or service inventions by going to a soundproofed room similar to toilets but for focused, pure introverted, high conceptual thought? Will we get our “me space”? “The Diary Room” in Big Brother (reality TV series) is a modern Earth analog to this, almost as though this holistic semantic thought was dialectically offered by an angel. It was of course accidentally unconsciously drawn from the simple necessity of the extroverted TV contestants of the show to have some “decompression” space with which to squeeze out more drama juice for the audience at home. Introversion is decompression and reintegration of psychic/psyche contents. The psyche is the base of the “psychic” powers (mind over matter). Telekinesis is something completely different and categorically unrelated because it’s raw general mathematical intuition and grasp, rather than it being something more of the current person, persona and personality expressed in the left brain component of the modern human. For example – Daniel Tammet is a modern example of someone mathematically gifted in general unconscious math, but not psyche-gifted as Carl Jung is the quintessential example, having been in the base of his own unconscious to write the books he has written. Memories, Dreams, Reflections is an essential reading on life and the power of the unconscious mind. It’s a very accessible book whereas Man and his Symbols isn’t so and is much heavier reading. Psychology and Alchemy is even heavier reading but contains a few gems like the divine mention of the idea that we should unite the masculine and feminine within us (as if we are actually both genders by default in our personality, our warmth, our compassion and empathy).
2102
2103Isn’t it strange that women can be compassionate towards you even if you’ve just met them for the first time, and some women you’ve just met days ago can actually make you break down in tears with their empathy and kindness? Women can go out of their way and circumvent the natural order of society to attempt to help you. Whereas men won’t hug you, take an interest in your emotional health, and wish you distinctly well about your interpersonal interactions with others and your safeguarded connection with society. Women push for the safeguarding of society (Luciferian feminine compassion protectorate energy) which is a type of holism compared to mens’ aggressive, left brain, penetrative and orchestration role. Some men are incredibly well individuated and balanced and warm, being sociable and a good sport with the staff, yet also with the comfortability of Self to engage their inner child (and then get playfully warned about the women in the office being ticked off about it) and to engage serious issues such as dealing with the police for the entire office, without breaking a step/sweat. When people are well-adjusted, they can afford to be balanced and stabilized.
2104
2105In the TV show Altered Carbon, characters are shown to re-insert into fleshy bodies (“sleeves”) which give you a totally new appearance. The ragtag militia in the story involves the extremely highly unconscious sentiments from Goddess contents of the archetypal regions in the psyche. The Goddess centers on the task of restoring society to its divine glorious potential, with such emphasis like the assurance that you are going to meet new challenges which you must not “contaminate” your soul with. For the Goddess, every human soul incarnating back onto Earth is her child who is doing her divine bidding; and it’s our mission to become warriors and achievers to defend humanity and bring the “baby souls” to divine completion. She wants us to know that our mortal body is not our true self (our soul) as the soul can always live on its own terms as a noumenal eternal entity. The Goddess warns that the world is a dangerous place where you will have to go through the void into a new environment that you don’t know, coming out to discover yourself on the other side and hopefully coming back in one piece. Warframe is strictly a Goddess Archetype video game at the outermost, with the ultimate archetypal enemy in the game being the “corrupted”. There is constant unconscious rotated symbolic emphasis on highly unconscious concepts and ideals, focusing on the archetypal plenum, the “unassuming” thoughts, at every opportunity. It’s the Shamanic video game.
2106
2107“ shamanism  
2108n.  The animistic religion of certain peoples of northern Asia in which mediation between the visible and spirit worlds is effected by shamans.”
2109
2110
2111“Animism 
2112    n. The belief in the existence of individual spirits that inhabit natural objects and phenomena.
2113    n. The belief in the existence of spiritual beings that are separable or separate from bodies.
2114    n. The hypothesis holding that an immaterial force animates the universe.”
2115
2116
2117
2118We’ve got to recognize “this holism now”, or that one or the other. This is how you can communicate cross-boundary using both your right brain and left brain capabilities. It’s rough, but you can start communicating with yourself. You find a convergent point of interest. Video games converge and unify, using the monad’s zero-dimensional expression, 
2119
2120Better than a basis “scientific” truth for all existence, we’ve got all the much more amazing, detailed things we can express individually. We’ve also got the freedom to coodinate and protract ourselves across them, protracting ourselves among the “details” (scenarios) we conceptually want to see, experience, joy and visit. A journey is a conceptual visit, in the way that the journey had to have not simply slices of basis “flat” reality, but a whole mathematically-descriptive journey (“phase”) from start to finish. Dreams are conceptual phases, as are waking days.
2121
2122Where is that “inspired state”? It’s your best self, and it comes about dialectically and spiritually and rationally as best presented by the best possible mix of sinusoidal contents, conceptions and percepts for you. You have to locate and coordinate this for yourself.
2123
2124We can give “the better faith” and “the benefit of the doubt” and we can see with the better faith of what people have said, exactly and precisely because of subjectivity (parallelism and symmetry). We can subjectively reach the highest appreciation of stories (Warframe) and see the best in something (as some people do with cars, Harry Potter memorabilia or their other favourite objects) precisely because of what high defined subjectivity affords and constitutes. Warframe includes descriptive words you’d never otherwise likely find, like “constitution”, and it involves you in a process, therefore it’s literally mathematically ontologically dialectical. It steers the unconscious in the right direction, and this is all the affordance that stories (mythos) ever needed, especially in the capacity of high concept stories (the Hero Monomyth).
2125
2126“Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.” - Benjamin Franklin
2127
2128Animism is about tacit implicit intuitive recognition of the involvement of all things in the processes we see in and around us all the time. In primitive Amazonian tribes they are thus reacting to the percepts in their environment (the “weather spirits”) and intuitively integrating these understandings into what we would call a thesis collected whole or philosophy (animism). We thus have microcosmic animism (low-dialectic; low-symmetrical) and macrocosmic animism (intuitive rational holism; ontological mathematics; mathematical philosophy; analytical parallel intuitive thinking). Spirits are sinusoids! Who knew?!
2129
2130
2131
2132You can talk to yourself with the archetypal lower-pitched, “guttaural”, willing voice (inner demon) when you want to express your will to your left brained self – playing dialectically by letting a thought escape while the left brain is still working on something. It is a flow interrupt pattern, which works much faster when automated unconsciously. The reason for these things (baking things into the parallel unconscious mode of thought) is that it frees our conscious mind-space to work on other things while reaping those same rewards. From the perspective of high technology, computer programming and little in-jokes with an old friend that went like “overclock your dog!”, this is simply “apparent” to the imagination and the unassuming psychic insight projected onto the “non-computing” domain of the mind’s “computing resources”. Conceptions, not just analogies, are what’s so powerful here. Conception is the broad base essence of every analogy, analog and metaphor. That’s how we can be “impressionable”. We are our mental contents (sinusoidally). Being = a single wavefunction collapse’s context, scope and reference-space; Becoming = the reference-space imposed and ranged over multiple wavefunction collapses. Collective God is the exception to this where we have formulated a contingent thought in the universe appreciating the wrap-around effect of all minds having maximized their Becoming and Being. The utility of thought is what makes the distinction for how we will select, favour or “prefer” different ways or styles to think about general reality, and that’s why you have to have a sinusoidally differentiated mind to be able to have a high conceptual space (a big mind-space). This distinction is of course “virtual”, i.e. it’s a conceptual difference not an additive difference. Angels have the same basis ontological structure (a mind) as us, but they do enormously conceptually different things with it.
2133
2134You can always talk to yourself as if you are solving a problem for another person in the room (this is useful for “sounding out” your problems in creative projects); or you could practice explaining general life issues as if presenting for a Youtube audience. You can voice your grievances (dialectical thread generation by providing unconscious and conscious “excuse space” for a response to come). Some scientists/studies have associated “sounding out your problems” with an increased capacity of the mind to hear things and then pay more attention to them simply because they’ve been vocalized. If we were adventurous here, we might even assume that an amplifying of percepts results in a narrowing of the mental math energy required to smoothly conceptualize in a more targeted, bi-directional bicameral way. We may then be tempted to say, confidently, that talking to yourself as much as possible and playing with those dialectical strands of spontaneuous intutive thinking INTJ “conceptually-closing” speech, is a means to expand the mind. We may have had bursts of success with this every so often over the years in life – (beginning from Creative Shadow frustrations surrounding the inefficiencies of the computer software industry and Microsoft) – where we actually make and draw new epiphanies from some speech holism drawn from nothing but our own spontaneous mind-weaving. Don’t forget;- if writing is dialectical upon the parallel page, and if speaking is habitually done with the bicameral self – then speaking aloud alone, voicing authoritatively on no percepts but mind contents to elucidate, could have now the properties to draw from holistic spontaneous creation like writing but without writing’s cues of structure.
2135
2136
2137
2138
2139“Amplification: using imagery to create a meaningful context around a symbol needing examination. Also known as elaboration of the symbol. In subjective amplification, a dreamer, for example, uses active imagination to associate to a dream symbol in order to grasp it better. In objective amplification, the analyst collects themes from mythology, alchemy, religion, and other sources to illuminate, or amplify, archetypal symbols produced in dreams or fantasy.”
2140
2141- A glossary of Jungian terms
2142
2143All imagination revolves around this. Daydreamers, visionaries, thinkers, creatives, artists, geniuses, engineers, maladaptive daydreamers – they all use this process to some extent and style. It’s the world of “what could be” and also “what should be”. Romatic dreams and romantic daydreams are examples of this, and we amplify all sorts of unconscious curiosities, wonderings and psychological complexes/neuroses during dreams. We can have the most thoroughly astounding symbolic reflections (like dating a strange mirrored reflected version of yourself!) inside dreams. We can unconsciously show compassion to people, children, animals that we’d never otherwise encounter via consciousness. In addition, these dream character contents, being conceptual and symbolic, also take the role of the pure unadulterated symbol for the ideal (since ideas are naturally purely conceptual in nature, and not perceptual). This is the reason for the divine, religious imagery mixing with male/female projected Other, as in the sense of the Anima/Animus figures we develop (the concept is not the person we would like to meet, or what their parents are like in the ideal case, which is another concept we develop) and anything else that prinipally takes our attention. People in dreams can be highly symbolic and conceptual; e.g., holding a child on your lap can be thoroughly indicative for you inside the dream of the connection it holds to society and social good health and standing; communal good intent and well-wishing; emotional and psychological “good standing” – all of this at once. This is the kind of grand concept that doesn’t translate into mundane mathematical capacity (it’s ranged too small!) scope for explanation. That’s why it’s hard to write out our dreams, because we are “squishing” their domain-space into human words and modern human cultural language. The Higher Self and its holistic space is too “big” for the modern world, which is the mystery of why we start to resist it so much. It’s the lack of dreams being perceptual in the full crispest sense at all, which allows us to seaprate from percepts entirely. This is the nature of holism, definitionally; i.e. it’s by definition that holism is this way and must be this way.
2144
2145
2146
2147“Absolute knowledge: the acausal foreknowledge, relatively independent of limitations of time and space, possessed by the unconscious and apparent in constellated archetypes and in synchronicity.”
2148
2149- A glossary of Jungian terms
2150
2151We can’t have something that is acausal operating in a causal uncaused-cause space (ontological reality). What we can have, however, is a knowledge which is in itself, nothing in particular to do with causes. This is the key (protracted; pivoted; coordinated; differential) property which sinusoidal inter-mirroring provides. We impose an infinite-dimensional web map over our full range of infinite sinusoidal basis sinusoids, with infinite range, banding, depth and height, which allows us to express far more than can fit into your head space or indeed the entire material universe (which is just a mathematical projection and not eternal mental basis mind existence, which is pristine eternal mathematical contents and the eternal selections we compose with them).
2152
2153
2154
2155“Aion: a lion-headed, snake-encircled Mithraic God-image of time (also called Kronos or Deus Leontocephalus) who for Jung represented death/rebirth and a psychological union of opposites like light and darkness, male and female, creation and destruction. "Eon," a long length of time, also meant for Jung the two-thousand-year Christian eon, which coincided with its astrological sign, Pisces, in which one fish represents Christ and the other its future opposite, the Antichrist. Below all this works the archetype of the hostile brothers; too, the astrological characteristics of the fish contain essential components of the Christian myth: the cross, the moral conflict and its splitting into two figures, the son of a virgin, the classical mother-son tragedy, the danger at birth, and the savior. For the alchemist, the fish also symbolized the Lapis; for Jung, unconscious wholeness.” 
2156
2157- A glossary of Jungian terms
2158
2159
2160All conceptual rims and outliers have to be integrated into god (god-concsciousness). They are all dialectical and thus pose “mirroring” properties. (Different mirror configurations in parallel reflect different things). But naturally and categorically, we of course only select the things most interesting to us. The Abraxas Archetype (The God Archetype) aims to be as highly efficiently rationally “smooth” as possible (it is most compossible with the true outliers and inliers of every bit of everyone’s Being) in accordance with selecting the best rational output for everyone. If the gods and angels didn’t exist, the whole planet would have turned to absolute chaos over the centuries, seeing as it would not have had the dialectical gentle prod of the most highly formed contingent concepts (like the secrets to mass food production in the Agricultural Revolution period). Those exact angels at that time were simply in “white people” bodies, which is all the explanation for the unfortunate accidental appearance of racism and international slavery history. The angels didn’t impose this on us; we did through embodied illusion and stupidity. (We did through the contingent, cultural differences and circumstances in basis nations, which the angels were not permitted to change). In other words, the angels operated at their maximum bounding of ability to save us, but it still wasn’t enough. Bless them! But they are beyond needing to be charitably praised, thanked or recognized. An angel lives for itself and is blinded by its own rational Light, which constantly surprises it. An angel is a “light addict”, where humans can be alcohol addicts, work addicts or Internet addicts. Mystical intuitives are intuition addicts without the pause for rational thought.
2161
2162
2163Using brackets allows us to step-up or step-down in the conceptual reference-frame trees. It is a type of “telescopic text”. It is a conceptual “telescopic text”, rather than a spacetime one. The quote marks are an instruction to think in unusual, unusually parallellized terms (“reading between the lines”). Figures of speech are holisms which help the parallel impression and indication to shine through. They hammer the message home (via cross-validation and cross-comparison).
2164
2165Isn’t it strange how simply searching for the “word synonym” we want to search for can hack our unconscious into action and deliver the right word before the damned “information hiding” internet reveals it to us? All the best words seem to be somehow missing from the first list on the related word you find. But your unconscious holism brain then kicks into work and can find the word pretty quickly. The distinction here is that the left brain here must be doing something to conceptually “categorize” or close-down in some major generally-conceptual-conception way, in order to boost (literally ontologically “lift”) the conditionality for the unconscious to do exactly so. The right brain via the Corpus Callosum is getting categorically and definitionally the right mathematical terms from the left brain, to maximize its instructional capacity. All right brain “sifting” is of course part bicameral! – because it’s part dialectical and part inner-dialectical!
2166
2167Even the way (principle) we use dashes to bring-together / pull-together the meanings of compound-words we want to inflex on everyone (their understanding), is itself dialectically obtained by our own writing expressions. In certain languages of the modern world we may find “compound words”. Symbols by themselves, with pictoral elements, definitely express this capability. Words in Ancient Greece were the antithesis to hieroglyphs because they could conceptually compound more information in(to) the same space. Speech always inflexes tone, which is decidedly important – but speech suffers the properties of not being as parallel as highly intuitive written writing. You never get highly parallellized speech unless you read philosophy aloud for someone.
2168
2169The quote marks in this book are the “impatient” right brain holism inserting and injecting itself onto the page, akin to how Alma Deutscher’s Higher Self is the “impatient” (rationally superior and commanding; leader) intervention which guides her 6-year-old piano process best. The soul cannot do but select for the maximization principle (apart from when percepts perceptually and spatiotemporally interrupt this smooth process). When percepts and their conditionalities/contingency bind us into uncomfortable silent situations with no eye contact, we have to rely on primordial self-interest minor loops of the maximization principle. This is exactly the categorical reason that all social anxiety needs be optimized out of society (the human experience and the Quality of Life needs to be optimized for everyone). The optimization of everyone in society is the essential meaning of economy and economization of all life (and thus capitalistic zero-sum-game efficiency). Capitalism in zero financial sum is not the same conditionality, conception or process of optimization as given by the ultimate society “left on the page” after capitalism’s superstructure of concept “exits” from the equation.
2170
2171Statements in this book like “translation (all translation is transformation)” are very revealing/telling of the dialectical nature of consciousness “within the page”. We are caused to test the last available dialectical strands, which are enclosed via percepts and percept-conditionality! (“The final contingency”!!!; The [definitional] last piece of the shifting, swizzling, moving motion puzzle). The mind has appeared on the page! Finally, for empiricists, although they can’t see. (Imagine a mind “appearing” via a trace in the physical realm, as in the case of a child’s glove found on the street in Winter and someone has put it on a high place so people can see; or as in the case of stories about people with their clothes strewn about their room). The mind appears in the video game screen and its world (when you conceptualize right).
2172
2173In computer programming (the “empiricist” art), you’d have to explicitly macrostructure everything else you’d Coordinated (the form you want to impress over the whole code base, or portions of it), around abstract mechanisms for things like “continue reading after this position now in this case”. In ontological mathematics, we strictly have to be provisioning these abstracted, indirected structures as an actual encoded part of basis existence itself! We have to literally, ontologically, be providing or provisioning the means to sub-step, drop out of, promote, scope-in, scope-out, carry, return, break, split and rejoin, etc., mental threads of conceptual execution/delivery. Moreover, these must be clean ontological mathematical expressions which are equal expressions on either side of zero. They must come baked in with ontological reality (and superimposed by the written content which is logically-traversible in such a way). With percepts that are not logos writing, we can freely range conception and conceptual selection over individual colours, shapes, 3d forms and individual elements (visor on a helmet) that make up something. This is a conceptual discipline which is strictly exposed continuously all along the Soul Line to the basis absolute mathematical domain of the full range of sinusoids. The advanced manipulative mathematical concepts are literally, mathematically, where mind has conceptually evolved into super-concept from sensory-concept! The trick here is that rather than any strictly “linear” evolution (as posited by empiricism in the essential sense of spacetime-spacetime interaction) we are massively multidimensionally inter-tweaking and inter-evolving all the time. (And there’s nothing we can do about it!). All sinusoids are billowing and floating and waving all the time (they are flowing).
2174
2175Breakage definitionally does not happen everywhere at once but over one domain. It happens over all sinusoids in a particular sinusoidal pattern.
2176
2177New websites always “haze” your mind in a flurry of new, unfamiliar spatial coordination information (mechanisms). It can “feel” (impress as) cluttered, convoluted and unwieldly ways to express information and information navigation. All the mystery to this is in subjectivity (conceptual inbuilding) and how familiarity is built in unconsciously and automatically as we discern the inwardly cutting counterparts of that particular niche corner or domain of life. All visual and spatial domains have this property (video gamers “game the system” by exposing, i.e. “subjectivizing”, the video games’ spatial environments and there where-pivotings).
2178
2179“Good format to read it in” = the ways to navigate, visit and traverse and impress and transcend the content, have been provided of a generally suited, suitable or advised/advisable quality. Format is subjective- or self-symmetrical parallellism i.e. the monad sees things “in good form” as in relational utility to itself, in precisely a downward conceptually sweeping manner (a conceptually closing manner, as viewed from the holistic right brain). The left brain interacts pursed and then outwardly beginning from within the narrow window that the right brain has created into the spacetime world (through the eyes and hands and legs); the portal to the spatiotemporal domain is where the left brain is breaching out from (and thus why it can constellate-and-converge (up)on the specific analytic frequencies needed to be transported to the rest of the conceptual right brain, fitting tactly and squarely into a compressional chamber of the right brain’s outermost conceptual holism (the full equation; the whole broad band equation of the conception).
2180
2181Of course, the Riemennian Conception quality of our writing goes in a form rendering this quality to life: the first conception or formulation (i.e. how we initially write out the sentence with the bicameral inner god mind guiding us through the creative God Hand) is as such, definitionally and categorically so, as to be the resultant poorer lesser formulation from the point of perspective/view of how we come to understand that we blazed over our sentences again to correct them with the Iterative Grand Leap Creativity of the new Higher Self Bicameral “suggestional” act. The god thus never appears on the page, while visiting and ranging and scoping itself all around the page, just as the infinitudal freely scoped immortally divine quality found in the rest of free Grand-Optimizational life, such as the creations given to us by angels. Angels’ creations or musical songs, if you could hear them, would definitively and rationally have this quality (the Riemennian Conception connection). If we understood the Riemennian Sphere consciously grasping its meaning and parallellisms of most general supersymmetrical note via a grand-sweep intuition, then would we intuit how to communicate with angels? What would this form of communication look like?
2182
2183
2184
2185
2186
2187Read the parts again about how Bruce Lee was talking about “formlessness”. Writing and written content literally opens up the dialectic for us to scrutinize as we explore our own formulations of our theories/theorizing. We are unpacking the dialectic right here. We rendition the dialectical quality (conceptual) Conceptually out onto the page and its transformations, writ large and in broad band where we are yet to define it for ourselves (where do you think the “source” for this sentence-creating is actually coming from as it’s being typed!?). We are ripping apart the foundations of ontology by writing and thinking and intuiting and emoting (with music) at the same time. We’re filling and fleshing it out. We’re tearing off the mask of nature and staring into the face of god (the monad, which is expressed sinusoidally-interdimensionally – over, beyond and above itself, by itself). Conception = creation = individuation = god reshifting itself. Genesis is a particular form of creation which alludes to its ultimate gnostic capacity. Genesis is pointed conception of a distinctly gnostic, Omega Point type and inference. Targeted writing is “the last contingency” for evolution and gnosis in modern human terms (straits). You have to have the boldness to break all the rules about writing, mythos-logos interlinking, sentence structure and type formatting if you want to reach better conditionality fastest in broad band.
2188
2189We are cracking open the contents(!!!) of the monad by engaging in sinusoidal supersymmetry intuition (High Content; High Concept, which comes with/as High Percept!). Splitting headache!
2190
2191
2192If a certain quality is given but not explicitly mentioned (such as explicitly mentioning that this book’s structure mirrors the Herald phase at the start and antithesis (“insanity”) in the middle and the Crescendo/Climax at the end) then it is implicitly expressed for astute readers to find anyway;- and that is actually a more elegant, beautiful, godlike rendition/composition in the ultimate absolute terms (of monadic expression). This is an expression of the incompleteness problem (Gödelian reality is “wrap-around” and hangs on no particular variable; zero must reach around again to infinity and vice versa, and mathematial pole inversion as in the Riemann sphere must apply to help circumnavigate(!!!) our reality that we [must] live in). The “final contingency” being played with here is in one sense the reader (thus we have scoped it [out] for the other soul). (Conception involves scoping, ranging, and other such powerfully conceptual words).
2193
2194What is the thing about concepts? Concepts like the Hegelian idea? These, we know must be contingent;- but they also must have non-totally-specific (non-stuck sinusoidal spiderwebs, we might say; non-static multidimensional parallel thoughts, but a conceptual meaning an intelligible, arrivable) quality of thought. They have “Incremental Creavitity” properties while still holding and servicing, yielding and amounting-to “Grand Leap Creativity” properties and qualities. Concepts are simply the conceptual endpoints of conception’s gross [large; in full weight, width and dimension] acts.
2195
2196Turns of phrase, figures of speech, make us think. They trick us! They bewitch us in a good way. They bewitch the imagination and enliven it. They electrify our thinking. Logos electrifies our thinking, but only principally (categorically) because it works in mass parallel dimensionality and supersymmetry in the monad.
2197
2198Notice that framing sentences with hints every so up the chain of conception, is actually us “long-forming” and ranging a dialectical step-ladder to aid the reader decisively (conceptually) to completion. This is only possible in a massively parallel universe where you can mass coordinate and mass intercept and circumscribe what you are about to say. The very fact we can make and entertain such “intuitive” statements as expressed throughout this book, is testament to the type of reality that we live in (but only if you have the eyes to see it! Only where and how you have the eyes to see it; which is our Gödelian incompleteness conditionality to it; the “last contingency” to it.)
2199
2200People who look for memes are enmired and enmeshed in what they will find if they click around a little bit;- maybe just that little bit more. Note that this is the same disposition as the alcoholic. When you “hope on the page”, you are sensing where you should be doing something else rationally. Gods don’t hope to find things in the sensory realm (where conceptually they are being poorly ranged). This statement about gods not hoping to find things in the sensory realm – it is actually equivalent to saying, when put into proper parallel terms;- “gods hope to enmesh their conditionalities in the face(ing) and the configuration of intuitive parallel supersymmetry tied towards the highest goal”. Gods are best fit thinkers, which is simply generally parallized raised rationality. You couldn’t make it up! There is no “special pleading”, (not in dimension of) secondary or formal difference between us and the gods; ourselves and the angels. Part of the “backport” of existence is actually that the “necessary” contingent denomination or determination (by this time so as to be in this range on this grade of soul planet in the universe) is that the relationship between angels and gods, ontologically of contingent content difference, must reflect the “exploding exponential curve function” nature of our existence (of gnosis and the reshuffling of god with itself), such as to inform us in our (now; recent) dialectical adventures and journeyings. Gnosis venture; logos venture; implies an astute analytical glance and approach to mathematical reason and concepts and supersymmetry and parallellism. All souls fit the same form, and we are only “lost” in the sense of the infinite dimensionality of so many unthinkably(!) countless listless sinusoids. We are lost in the sinusoidal Great Forest! And thus Gaia appears. All souls have potential, and all souls are convertible to the maximal expression (i.e. that which we would make into our future partners anyway in soon centuries). What a thought! We have reached a moot point of subjectivity;- a “controlling point”. Angels have reached, dialectically and parallell-ly, the basis contingent “control points” allowing them unhindered unfettered dialectical evolution. Angels are going decisively and irrevocably “straight up”. They have hit a break point for dumb thoughts. How many angels can fit on the end/edge of a pin? We have as many ways to describe angels or the life above us don’t forget, as there are ways to dialectically d(e)rive towards the solution from them! The number of basis sinusoids must be commensurate with the number of monads in the monadic collective – as, otherwise, everything of phenomena wouldn’t categorically be reflectible in the same basis terms (Riemennian terms) as everything else! Yowzer! It follows that if there is no sufficient reason to limit the higher number of sinusoids, and as there is no sufficient reason to limit the number of monads, then this number must also wrap around at the point of infinity/zero. All monads lose themselves and become “solar wing” at the point of The Omega Point, which is a parallel pointed manifestation of multilaterally supersymmetrical “well-formed god”. This is the meta version of zero wrapping around the monad! Reality is thus been conceptually completed, under the aspect of Eternity. Also, this quality must itself (a conditionality) be a parallellizable quality capable of being rendered, ranged, scoped or faced over the general conditions of other nonzero conditionality in other monads (it must itself be pronouncible and pointable in parallell supersymmetrical terms, towards other circumstances facing outwards in parallellism from the common reference point of such a type of supergeneralized superprecise parallellism).
2201
2202Basis fully-conceptually-settled and -satisfied reality must include the capacity to connect to the Collective Unconscious = everyone else, and also as in the case of Astral Sex and Shared Lucid Dreaming which have to be folded as no more mere special cases of reality, i.e. all monads must be involved in the true grand conceptual wrapping around true ontological infinity and true ontological zero in the highest expressive sense of what these (conceptual) capabilities actually are.
2203
2204In C++, template metaprogramming is the incredibly tricky yet incredibly rewarding and thrilling Art Of The Irreducible. You have to learn habitually how to mathematically maximize yield (conceptual yield!!!) while minimizing percept appearance (symbol inflexion and conceptional conditionality). It involves a ton of conceptual modelling and unconscious generalization of how percepts fit into concepts at various levels and scopes of conceptual completion/closing. (This means we are exploring Conceptual Aspect). You collapse and upslap the conceptual stacks of things you want to express. It’s “wax on, wax off” from Mr. Miyagi’s (mentoring) analog given to the student in Karate Kid (1984). Computer programming is highly conceptually inflexing of the Sensory Thinking capacity of the mind. That’s what’s so accessible about it. It exposes parallel thinking in a serial space (domain)! – and it mathematically does this by “relying” on the sense-space so the mind-space can operate on it as much as it wants to (high reliable bandwidth over a long period of time). It literally can develop your thinking. Writing is similar in this sense because it elevates (lifts) the sense-space into higher mind-space utility, focus, inflexion and organization (“beauty”; which is to say, parallel sinusoidal symmetry properties ranged over infinite sinusoidal “dimensions”). Hammer it out! Make the case again until you get it clearer! Don’t Stop; Carry On! (as the Gundam song of the same name goes). Don’t Stop Shining On. Reach for the stars. You want to bake such sentiments and ideations (semantics!) into your unconscious as a form of abstract gnostic will;- analytical “Presence”.
2205
2206Where is the same place that motivation comes from? (To surmise whether to expand on a word definition by quoting from Wikipedia)? – the subjective parallellism of modelling of parallel definition/”truth”!!! You couldn’t make it up. We always reflect our current (grand) estimations. We know when it’s a dead horse.
2207
2208
2209
2210
2211“Ambitendency (or ambivalence): Bleuler's concept that every tendency is balanced by an opposite one. Applies particularly to all "feeling-tones" and the bipolar nature of libido, which flows forward and backward.”
2212
2213- A glossary of Jungian terms
2214
2215
2216Everything is dialectical, in other words, and will reflect you onto something else by the curved shape that you currently draw existence in. Thought is substance; but the trick here is that conception is the grand substance, not some individual particular isolated (non-dynamic; static) property of the thoughts you used to have, somehow expressed conceptually as if to “lose meaning”. Good thoughts do not lose meaning. Thought is strictly organic, dynamic, continuous, constant, endless, and eternal.
2217
2218If you don’t have the spiritual strength to do something (carry a thread or goal forward), then it stands to holism that you should do your dialectical part/thrust so that others can meet you in spirit, to run together.
2219
2220
2221“Apperception: active (attention) and passive (fantasy or dreaming) types; process by which a new psychological content is articulated with similar, already existing contents in order to make it understandable.” 
2222
2223- A glossary of Jungian terms
2224
2225
2226This is what’s being proposed with Active Imagination. It’s your very own inner dialectic accessible in visual, social and psychological concepts in your conceptual mind-space at any time. It’s the Personal Nexus! This is what an angel and god can use. It’s escaping the phenomenal world. In The Matrix, the characters can be plugged into their own computer programs, like the all-white-background world, the place where they summon all the guns they want via mind, and like training programs (the rooftop jump scene and the helicopter flight knowledge download). What you are actually able to do with Active Imagination is mentally simulate new social and psychological scenarios which you then act out without ever having experienced them in person before. It’s conceptual. It allows you to practice things like how you’re going to just grab your girlfriend and kiss her passionately the next time you meet her before she can even say anything. It’s what the imagination can allow you to do in pure mind-space, mind-given, mind-derived, mind-determined evolutionary capacity/terms. No external dialectic and no percepts are operating in this space. It’s the god space.
2227
2228The right brain (the seat of the soul) wilfully overrides the left brain sensory, spatiotemporal domain entirely. It’s signal interrupt (as if you hacked the world’s TV stations and found your own TV channel or television and spoke to yourself). This is a holistic concept, just like the notion of your face in the corner of your periphery in your mind’s eye where you would vocally and pictorally talk to yourself. This is holism; the right brain; not the left brain. It’s the conceptually closing ability, not the conceptually opening-up ability. (Both types are “liberation” of a different strand). Think back to the Alma Deutscher documentary scene with the bicameral Higher Self operating as if a guardian spirit guiding the young 6 year old girl to play piano. It’s not a ghost, it’s not a teacher or parent, it’s the “formless” quality or the irreducible quality of grand holistic conception (the god within; the hidden god; the obscured god who is obscured from mainstream society).
2229
2230The Obscured God was, after all, made up of all those things we’d pieced together to get here – computer programming, for example, which had been obscured from many people in this way.
2231
2232Bruce Lee was talking about the “formless” because he was trying to imagine the “thing-in-itself” and then he was ranging it across the broad band (spectrum) of its achievements. We can say that conceptually we want to meet godhood, but we also don’t get around there without both sinusoidal web in infinite dimensionality, and percepts/content. (This is because no matter what we do, we’re always actually forming our next thought, which must be a particular and must try to meet a best-fit thought for us). Strictly, we can look at the minds of angels to see that percepts aren’t necessary in this formulation. It’s all about the contingent nature within contigent thought (expressed in parallel, to alleviate any infinite-regress Bad Infinity resolvement problem). The spice of life is expressed sinusoidally in infinite dimensionality at all times – that’s exactly why you can never take any one strict piece out of it, and that’s why reality doesn’t reduce to one single concept, one single percept, at a time (but is wholly active, dynamic, broad band, selecting, conceptual, sinusoidal, PSR-type, and all else which we can never express in full holistically, at least not here, because unlike angels our thoughts and sensibilities and dispositions are not “patient” enough for this [and we still suffer the limits of words which are leftbrained constructs]; we do not actually possess the capacity to handle such things). Imagine an angel trying to tell you “the truth”. In one Youtube series, by socialexperimentalist, he goes around asking people stark parallelistic, holistic existential questions in broad daylight. He asks people things like “what’s really going on?”. You cannot compact the meaning of life onto someone who definitionally, sinusoidally, cannot appreciate it. This is revealed by several conceptual indexes to us (most notably in particular cases(!) of the sensory(!), how someone dresses and carries themselves; most notably of a psychological or philosophical dimension, how rational they are). We can never express “life” because actually, the frame of reference we hold for it is always shifting! It’s included in the conception of life. It’s encoded in us, ourselves. We can only range and coordinate by the maximum expressional outreaches of objective signal patterns (sinusoids). This must only happen in parallel and in infinite dimensions. At root, we exist in and by infinite dimensionality. At the spacetime versus pure sheer conception sense, we exist in a six dimensional universe of space, time, matter and interactions thereof. But we must remember that this itself even, is a limited conceptual scope (scoping) within all of ontological conceptual reality which is contingently delivered by us. At root, there are no such distinctions pressed consistently across all domains of life. Domains of mathematical life are strictly contingent and imposed and provisional. For gods, matter is a plaything because the god’s brain would have to be a transient concept (sand blows away in the winds of change).
2233
2234You can’t say too much, because then you’ve said something false and intractible. It’s all in the conception, and conception comes with parallellism (infinite sinusoids).
2235
2236Angels have to bring to bear the capacity that you might do amazingly well then fuck up and quit and ruin your life. Angels are the souls that never gave up. Angels and gods cannot just up and disappear and go nowhere; we are always drawn to our ideals (holistic pictures of things like cozy sleepy towns) and we are all profoundly affected by how our percepts map up reality to us.
2237
2238At certain times, you wonder if you can reassure people that you’re still human, good, and compassionate. This is a limiting factor. Angels are far beyond these considerations. Significantly higher life always looks “cold” and “unapproachable” and “aloof” from lower down, viewed emotionally and in sensory terms according to one’s needs, insecurities and complexes. It’s not lonely at the top; it’s divine. Everything makes absolutely crystal-clear sense. Everyone is on the same page.
2239
2240You are always selecting to either use the left brain to target things (look at each sentence and think on it by parsing it) or your Higher Self actually skips over things entirely for you unconsciously, acting in place of you for you like a divine emanation and interference. This is all the difference in cases like synchronicity, inspiration (Tarot readings for an intuitive thinking soul trying to meet the holistic conception of a bright destiny for it), accidentally typing a wrong, rotated word as you write a sentence; flow and concentration where time flies. “Time flies when you’re having fun”, but really it’s the soul enjoying itself when we do the things we love like playing sports, playing video games, reading/writing, painting, computer programming and so on. It’s the left brain’s subsumption, and it’s the left brain’s suspension which loses track of time while the soul is having fun. The reason why the unconscious holistically gifts us tangenitally-directed, “inaccurate” “false” words (as appearing to a sensing scientist type), such as providing us with the words “subsumption” and “suspension” from the unconscious to immediately inject into a sentence structure – is that the left brain only selected to close up the sentence and the right brain wanted to conceptually wrap it in two(!) branching grand statements. This means we have to consciously then look up the words on google, and try to navigate how the unconscious (by degrees of separation) is actually hinting at perhaps not just one (dimensionality) aspect but multiple (non-dimensionality) expressions. This is entirely the point of having both hemispheres of a brain, one located in spacetime and the other operating to “phone home” to the nonlocal domain. “Phone home” is a phrasing taken from the E.T. alien movie (it’s an alien holistic Higher Self transported and crashed down onto humanity’s left brain world and it tries to help).
2241
2242What does the right brain “say”? “I will perform the best that I can, irrespective of the Earth requirements and I will supersede them”. Holism is all about wrap-around, conceptual statements which simply categorically have no left-brain analogy or counterparts. The left brain learns itself thorough the right brain, and vice versa, through the dialectic which is endless and eternally binding (on all of us).
2243
2244Phrasing Selections always fight to get entered. We are swizzling and rotating subsections of mental conception to see which ones fit best across all possible use-cases (the rangings of “who”, where and how our sentences will be handled). The holistic right brain is expressed by Yoda (words backwards in part and reorganizable or shiftable generating the same resultant meaning = holism). The significance of this is that your best thoughts categorically come out just as you are writing them, and never otherwise, by definition. Creation is about combining Grand Leap Creativity as part of Incremental Creativity. We hybridize and synthesize to the highest point; the maximal possible efficiency; the best possible acts. This implies things like “carrying” parts of sentences to maybe later be expressed. It implies short term memory, and all the other conceptual traversal properties and bells-and-whistles of consciousness. We must find the best fit, and in the end ulimately (for humans with brains), this ranges conceptually over part of the conception (the percepts; the content) in the end; and in the grand scheme of things this means that percepts “have pivot”. Pivoting is what percepts can do and can generate, via mind and conception.
2245
2246
2247
2248The reason never to take praise is that praise isn’t “formless” as Bruce Lee put it. Everything is dialectical and you need to advance a custom-built, uniquely customized sinusoidal display/pattern/arrangement for your own current, contingent best-fit needs. This is the strict ontological reason why angels can’t help you.
2249
2250“[Solid Snake:] A strong man doesn't need to read the future, he makes his own.”
2251
2252 - Metal Gear Solid
2253
2254
2255Quotes of recent memory stay in the mind until their potential has been maximized. (It meshes, like a last puzzle-piece, with the given scenario). We could even say here that discipline and maturity means to wait for the relevant/right opportunities to come up before speaking and saying something.
2256
2257
2258
2259“[Oracle:] Ohh, what's really going to bake your noodle later on is, would you still have broken it if I hadn't said anything?”
2260
2261- The Matrix (1999)
2262
2263All oracles are parallel thinkers, sweeping to intercept what other people will do and trying to help them from themselves. There is a place for mystical intuitives in the New World Order where they can host their “magic” where they “help people”. This is one of their Sacred Causes and it’s a beautifully touching thing. It’s a dialectical function, even as a “placebo effect” as it’s called, because we have cause to consider and to wonder.
2264
2265
2266
2267“Canalization: the conversion or transformation of libido as it performs various mental activities. Transfer of psychic intensities or values from one content to another. Replaces "sublimation." Canalization sets up a gradient so instinctual energies can do productive work. It does so via the symbol, which offers a steeper gradient than the natural one. The transformation of instinctual energy is done via an analogue of the object of the instinct: a psychic mechanism imitates the instinct and thereby captures its energy (like a power station at a waterfall). The first achievement of this by primitive man is magic. Compare with psychization, which transforms an instinctual or sensory datum, rather than energy, into an experience.”
2268
2269- A glossary of Jungian terms
2270
2271So, we are supposed to individuate (sinusoidally intermix across all possible dimensions and webbing) things like loudness, intensity, energy, compassion, pleading, necessity, of various types.
2272
2273
2274
2275If you overexert yourself and get into a mix where you feel uncomfortable, you will fail (burn out). Your efforts (your percepts composed around you) will yield “friction”. There is friction of an outcomes-consideration type. We project future outcomes.
2276
2277
2278
2279Percepts do not close your mind down or override you. Consider that as you learn in life, your eternal mind sinusoidal contents must have been fully “preserved”. The explanation for this is of course that the “physical” domain isn’t real but the mental domain is, and generates sense-perceptions only, which can via minds (events, circumstances) have enormous psychological and mental/emotional hold over us. However this doesn’t mean that we are bound by this, and the simple proof is that we can always go back to logic, logos and intuition to rejoin (conceptually) the tails and ends and heads of where we left off. Reality is strictly a mind domain and only mind is real. The kicker is that mental expressions (content, matter, culture, society) are what inform, at grand meta-scale, the mind. It’s all in how you conceptualize! That is the only way you get free about it. Neo in the end of The Matrix flies off like Superman. He has fully individuated himself sinusoidally (in infinite dimensions that everyone else wasn’t conscious About(!!)) 
2280
2281The word “about” has analogous means as “around”, and “circumscribed”. When we are talking about something, we are conceptually surrounding (exploring; mirroring) the concept and the point of reference, which is always analytical and always expressed by the combination or “synthesis” of all sinusoids at once. That’s why there “isn’t any point in anything in particular”. The point is dialectically found. The focal point in an image is where your eyes are drawn to; which is not the same thing as how you conceptualize about it. Scientists will never find the focal point of (the) mind precisely because it’s expressed over a dynamic, moving, mental web of infinite sinusoids.
2282
2283We use the analogy habitually of a circle, around which are expressed natures or patterns concerning how to get to the inner point, or how to move outwards in the circle. This is because of Euler’s Formula and also because parallellism must always necessarily and categorically have a common reference point when we express things of a nature common to Flowing Points! And it’s because the contingency or conditionality of the unit circle must always be expressed outside(!) of the expression given by the rest of the parts of such statements. We express things common to a set of parallel items converging on a commonality; pointed points! – and that’s principally, categorically and necessary the only type of parallel projection, expression and communication (i.e. this is to say, conscious parallel conveyance in particular is necessarily categorically this way, and all human languages must revolve around the unit circle). Thought can only work this way (inter-reflection and inter-relation), and this is categorically so, enshrined and mandated and impressed by the PSR. Empiricism just got BUSTED!
2284
2285The more you know and learn, the more you can outstrip other people who were in a better position at the start of life than you. You may have reincarnated into a single-parent childhood, with poverty from the beginning, but you can still come to write a book like this. This is because knowledge is not one-dimensional, like thought. (Fortunately for us, basis existence is a Meritocracy.)
2286
2287One-dimensional: whether you’ve found true love; whether you’re good enough by other peoples’ terms. The Anima wishes for you to know that life isn’t one-dimensional, and your contributions won’t be judged on this one point or index alone. Think of how the angels or gods must “judge” humans. There is in fact no possible standard. All of life is ontologically free and “formless” in bare basis, before it can be orchestrated for via universals (which is what angels and gods task themselves with). All universals are sinusoids.
2288
2289
2290“Complex (or "feeling-toned complex"): from a term borrowed by the German psychologist Zeihen and used by Eugen Breuer, then Jung and Freud: a cluster of emotionally charged associations, usually unconscious and gathered around an archetypal center (and so a blend of environment and disposition). Repressed emotional themes. Complexes were first noticed by Aristotle, who in his Psyche called them part-souls, and behave like little personalities (and have unconscious fantasy systems), often even after partially incorporated into awareness. A more powerful complex will either blend with one less powerful or replace it, and its constellating power corresponds to its energy value.” 
2291
2292- A glossary of Jungian terms
2293
2294Feelings are not one-dimensional, but reflect coordinated, sinusoidally-webbed reflective properties. (Ontological sinusoidal properties; thoughts and thought inter-relations).
2295 
2296
2297
2298
2299
2300“Daimonic: from the Greek daimone, the half-divine interior being thought to instruct the wise, daimonic for Jung meant a conscious relationship with the psyche's imaginal-archetypal figures (e.g., the Philemon and Salome personifications he got to know in his dreams and fantasies). James Hillman accurately refers to Jung himself as a "daimonic man." ” 
2301
2302- A glossary of Jungian terms
2303
2304This is a Daimonic book. You have access to Daimonic archetypal contents if you develop them; which can be leveraged and arranged/pulsed as “characters” in the Active Imagination. You don’t typically ask them about yourself, but they can provide a backdrop as if a hypothetical friend laying on the couch in your room, offering occasional advice or reactions (we would start with the basics like disgust and praise, which are dialectically evolved in this new domain). All imaginary friends are of course Daimonic. They are the childrens’ Higher Selves selecting to range over the child, but this doesn’t necessarily mean the child’s Higher Self is particularly intelligent or conscious. It’s a selection, as with all other axes, dimensions and aspects of life. You can have weak help from a present Daimon, or strong help from a Daimon that rarely appears. Spiritual crisis is one way to encounter your inner Archon and Phoster daimons. If you think about it, they would have to be pressed particularly hard to derive you some narrow, niche advice in divine terms and divine psychological circumstances/stretches.
2305
2306
2307“Dreams have two levels of interpretation, the objective (analytical), in which the symbols stand for external realities, and subjective (synthetic; "hermeneutic"), in which they stand for aspects of the dreamer's psyche. If the person dreamed about is of vital interest to the dreamer, an object interpretation is probably appropriate.”
2308
2309- A glossary of Jungian terms
2310
2311Dream symbolism is always sinusoidal contents rotated by the holistic right brain unconscious; the Higher Self mind. In thin cases of dreams, we have had a thin underbelly to our recent active life. In the inverse case, we have crossed upon a major conflicting sinusoidal nature in our life (major personal developments or crisis points), by which the Higher Self is dialectically pressed to act, or to offer vivid new imaginative insights or solutions. Insights and antithesis are of course the same thing ultimately, when composed so. Thought is all about “extensionality” and bringing us to something else. Gods are simply thinkers which explored all the full range of mental territory (they are sinusoidal Colonizers and Adventurers and Explorers) and then discovered that most of life is simply (framed from that perspective) generally just an unwitting, reflexive inflexion of the highly capable properties of the full set of sinusoids. We can contrast the points of “early game” and “late game” sinusoidal scenarios or states; most people are “early game” in content while gods have put their hands on the “endgame” content as fast as possible. All gamers in all video games are “gaming the system”, seeking to grab hands on the most powerful content (weapons, items, abilities) as early as possible. Gamers always ruin the game for themselves and we are left playing the game just so we don’t have to play it anymore. All gamers relentlessly and amorally seek the company of other players who are fun for them. This is done unconsciously at first.
2312
2313
2314
2315    “We succeeded in taking that picture [from deep space], and, if you look at it, you see a dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever lived, lived out their lives. The aggregate of all our joys and sufferings, thousands of confident religions, ideologies and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilizations, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every hopeful child, every mother and father, every inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every superstar, every supreme leader, every saint and sinner in the history of our species, lived there on a mote of dust, suspended in a sunbeam.
2316
2317    “The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that in glory and in triumph they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of the dot on scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner of the dot. How frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds. Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the universe, are challenged by this point of pale light.
2318
2319    “Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity – in all this vastness – there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves. It is up to us. It's been said that astronomy is a humbling, and I might add, a character-building experience. To my mind, there is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly and compassionately with one another and to preserve and cherish that pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known.”
2320
2321    — Carl Sagan, speech at Cornell University, October 13, 1994
2322
2323
2324This has the numinous quality. Isn’t space religious? Isn’t it profound? What’s there when you look up out into the sky? Look up the next time you go for a walk. Think how far the distance extends infinitely into deep space!
2325
2326
2327Being right/wrong about something can be on the edge of midnight (the numerical passing of the day). Correctness is never one-dimensional, but webbed and sinusoidal. This gives a kind of vindicating, soothing feeling which is particularly dialectically evolved in strategy by certain archetypes within you. Everything has sufficient cause, and we must dig down into the meta-aspects of the formation of thought (conception and conceptualizing).
2328
2329
2330
2331
2332The complete absence of fear is where you need to get with writing and creativity. What is insanity? In lazy terms, we might falsely say that insanity is going against whatever everyone else generally does and thinks (which is all unique anyway; there is no “normal” strictly speaking). But this is a drawn conception. We are always drawing in dialectical parallels to make sense of things. In political squabble fights, people range their best conceptions of reality over the situation and are surprised when a wholly different conception counteracts them and the two conceptions/conceptualizations can’t be unified. Two worlds clash. Only the finest minds (angels) can encapsulate everyone else’s thoughts within their own; their own models, assertions, assumptions and schematic offerings. This doubles-up as proactively intercepting what other people will think (it comes with the conception) and acting to correct course. Angels know acutely that they cannot make other people smarter. They dialectically have drilled-down into this in their own minds. Have you got it yet?
2333
2334What’s the mental clash of the angels? “Clash of the Titans”?
2335
2336
2337Authenticity and spiritual purity means sticking with the true task; the true path; that will realize and actualize for all the world to see ultimately. This is a strictly holistic, Higher Self concept.
2338
2339You categorically can’t worry about things you don’t understand. There are two types here; two splits; there are intuitive domains for study, like politics; and there are things so broad of phenomena that you’re better off not worrying and you would intuitively tell this. You focus on learning instead. You will do the best that you can do, and nothing more can be expected of you.
2340
2341
2342Music is the “loudness” of emphasis and spiritual determination. With music, you’re supposed to “feel out” (perceive and conceive) what your environment in the wider world is like, which is holistic. What is music selection? It’s deliberate, bicameral (holistic Higher Self) intervention. It ranges the music selection; the percepts and the imaginative zeal, over your life. This is only possibly a deliberate fashion which is also unconscious. It’s holistic. Listen to the “caution” music from Metal Gear Solid 3. You are supposed to describe your own meanings of what life’s challenges are presenting to you (in semantics) so you can move to address them with the appropriate (super-) syntax. That spells the spiritual purpose of music. It’s found dialectically. The Higher Self has chosen to “inform” the left brain via “golden nugget” Percepts. Such is our spiritual music selection process. Selection comes with the conception. Some music (the Groznyj Grad caution version from MGS3) has epithets and flicks and weaves of the Self acting at its best capacity (as if a flashy, shining holistic hero). The archetypes are of course holistic, and they can be flashy (The Trickster). Holism facilitates all of this. Percepts must actually be part holistic! Specifically, we can say they relate holism to localism, both at each protracted part (sinusoidal signal place/point) and in parallel, patterned sweeping fashion.
2343
2344Music always has encoded qualities; connotations. The connotations and personal meanings are baked-in with the memories; they are in our sinusoidal configuration (The Selector Function has to do with this). The contents come bubbling up from the unconscious, like a story forming and roughly taking shape; and this is strictly holistic. That’s how stories are even dialectically created within us when we watch movies.
2345
2346Some songs have an encoded suggestion of archetypal “hardness”. That’s Outlaw Archetype Music for you. It’s the one who takes his own path and makes it out and carves it strongly for himself, independently from the society (we can cast and range this as abstract archetypal math pieces, or domains, which can be explored by applying this archetype in the noumenal domain). He stands at the top of the peak of essential self-definition, and he makes the grade for himself away from others’ support, and he has the capacity in his hands to do this. He goes on his big adventure or journey away from the small town, and he develops himself definitively and reservedly; he seeks his destiny out wherever it lies. He keeps travelling on from destination; battle to battle; over the plains until he meets his dialectic. The Outlaw doesn’t feel sorry for himself; he tests himself. All men must encounter themselves and seek it out. They must all “go on their great big adventure”. Wilderness survival is one principal reflection of this archetype in modern society, but it comes in various flavours blanketed and wrapped by circumstance: is it a touristy side attraction for the man; or is it actually living in a cabin with a family in Alaska and making it your life’s craft? Meaning is different to different people and this is encoded in environment, scenario, setting, interpersonal relations and psychological mappings. That’s why people love stories: it connects them to a holistic, generalized reality-picture. Holism is accessible, whereas logos is something you need a mental engine to conceptually close the statements with. People running mythos engines can’t get the tires to grip. (Or maybe they’re on horseback! Different strokes for different folks). The Outlaw seeks the Eternal Challenge within himself, or his journey (depending on how it is put to you). It’s for this pattern that holisms are powerful (their vagueness and imprecision is useful from “either side” of the conception; it actually literally triggers parallellism). Harry Potter is a chief example of holism that provides a holisic conceptual wrapper everyone can enjoy. It’s spiritual, mystical, family-friendly, nostalgic, it has INFJ warmth, it has the allure of childhood wonder and intrigue and mystique, and it also has the psyche development material (all stories have individuation material!) of the teenage puberty and cross-social-group life. In particular the part where witches and wizards from different schools meet, is quite interesting to holism. Everyone loved that part. Why? It excited and teased the imagination. It was a conceptual closing but also left some things conceptually open. That’s the wondrously grand thing about holism. The magic wand is a holistic instrument.
2347
2348What faces or hand activities does a god make? The god template is the one that can hold all the primitive tribal actions; the fanciful emotional, social and sexual human expressions, and also the rational and spiritual (holistic) conceptions. God encapsulates all, and this must be so. Many physical shapes (sex poses, crouching, angels in movie posters) exist but these are all spatial motifs with noumenal semantic properties. The sinusoidal web sweeps with parallel, fanning overlapping motion! We are all of this nature. We can interpenetrate ourselves precisely because we are not 3-dimensional but multidimensional! Graphics can go up to 4 dimensions (the 4d hypercube) but it must always display in 2d on a 2d screen. The screening is the framing. Framing comes with the conception. Narrative framing and political framing (e.g. propaganda) come with the conception. Agenda is conception.
2349
2350Only a snaking bodily dance expresses spatial manifestations and echoes of that precise noumenal syntax. Music is the dancing expression of a web of sinusoids. Dancing, just as much as “3 dimensional” physical acts, of course has holistic, broad band expression (conception). Dancing must be dialectical, and its perceptual enpoints are tied in far more than 3 dimensions. As soon as we consider the whole space of something (as if a surface in a 3d program, which operates logically as in the case of surface vertex normals for lighting), we are already engaged in conception, conceptual ranging, conceptual interest regions and mental focus points – which are of a shape – this comes with the conception, and is expressed by sinusoids.
2351
2352In the old game Crash Bandicoot: Warped, we saw an archetypal character who sometimes danced and expressed in vivid, unapologetic ways. Dancing your heart out implies freeing yourself from your inhibitions. It expresses the true self deliberately, freely and without particular restraint (“openly honest”; “emotionally honest”; “emotionally vulnerable”, which means someone is strong enough to do so). Humanity needs to unlock this ability in the holistic sense.
2353
2354Pervs take a peek. Angels don’t need to take a peek. They understand. They have sinusoidally “charted” this territory in their exploring adventures.
2355
2356Musical “noumenal percepts” can range over archetypes, Self, world, and so on. It’s all in the conception. It’s all in how you think. Do you have the imagination? Can you still engage in wonder like a child? Have you lost contact with your Inner Child? (This is actually a veiled expression of, have you lost contact with your Higher Self bicameral child guide? – which would of course for anyone asking that kind of question, arise from a previous human life’s wisdom).
2357
2358
2359
2360
2361Do you have a “spiritual name” for yourself? As if you developed a name for your soul. In Harry Potter, every witch and wizard has a spirit animal (Harry’s is the stag).
2362
2363
2364    "This ancient and mysterious charm conjures a magical guardian, a projection of all your most positive feelings. The Patronus Charm is difficult, and many witches and wizards are unable to produce a full, corporeal Patronus, a guardian which generally takes the shape of the animal with whom they share the deepest affinity. You may suspect, but you will never truly know what form your Patronus will take until you succeed in conjuring it." 
2365
2366    —Miranda Goshawk's overview of the Patronus Charm
2367
2368“There are two types of Patronuses: corporeal which means a Patronus with a particular shape and form and incorporeal Patronus. Incorporeal Patronuses have no particular shape and do not protect against dementors the way corporeal Patronuses do. However, some wizards like Remus Lupin choose to cast incorporeal Patronuses to hide their identity.”
2369
2370- Wikia
2371
2372You don’t exist in one capacity or the other, but you are bicamerally present all at the same time as if conceptually “split down the middle”. Your right brain self is here in the sense of the archetypal demon and angel within, patiently waiting in between what it applies itself to (holistic threads of fancy of life) as does your left brain self apply itself to logical, distinct and scrutinized matters. Your left brain self doesn’t sit here independently. The angel archetype and the anima/animus archetype are conceptually as if they were standing right beside you (the “doppelganger”); but this is a conceptual holism entirely inconvertible to left-brained “truth”. Holism is not empirical precisely because sinusoids of an infininte webbed domain and quality/pattern are not enthused or well-positioned to “come” here or arrive here, which is “their own” conception. Personification itself is simply a mathematical multidimensional rolling shape projected onto human shapes we call “bodies”. Comedy TV shows illustrate the pure illusion of character that we are actually projecting onto other humans who are only assuming mathematical identities and personalities. Personality is mathematical, and that’s precisely why “everything can be forgiven in the end”. This is also a holism equal to “everything is forgivable in the end”, and “everything will be forgiven in the end”. It’s sinusoidal inevitability.
2373
2374
2375“Agent Smith: You hear that Mr. Anderson?... That is the sound of inevitability... It is the sound of your death... Goodbye, Mr. Anderson...”
2376
2377- The Matrix (1999)
2378
2379The default “slate” nature is becoming god, because the (Hegelian) absolute itself (as if we imagine the full broad range of sinusoids but with no particulars expressed onto this full background slate) simply holds the regional capacity to express this. Life must become conscious, and the way that it re-begins this is the symmetry-breaking operation. Consciousness is the particular present, given, provisional structure within the universe which is maximally configurably conscious to, in particular, the current circumstance of how we have to get to aligning ourselves to divinity. This intermeshes at all times with the modern society (“the left brain”), which is why angels and gods can’t simply bring you up to gnosis because it’s emphatically not a linear scale but an infinitely-sinusoidal one. The only exception might be the case of incredibly testing human acts, by which Merits a soul deserves a bit more of a push for the next life, optimized by the hand of a god.
2380
2381Imagine all the most toilet, dirty, filthy, sensual, sexual and sexually perverse thoughts you’ve ever had. Imagine if you farted while an angel considered you. Imagine the worst possible thoughts of darkness and death and cynicism. And recognize that gods are exactly what’s knowing of your thoughts here and exactly the kind of metaphysical entity (mind) that is wholly sympathizing/empathizing and accounting and vindicating with you on this, all through your life potentially. It’s as though, for a moment, we can suspend the angels or the gods out of their high home and pull their heads right by our own. That’s the reflective property of high concept speaking.
2382
2383Personality is actually a locus of mathematics (akin to a domain). This is what actors are tapping into. Unconsciously, the right brain’s holism can start to tune into this the more conscious you are, and it “feels” a certain way. Mental redirection is exactly how telekinesis must be possible for incredible minds. There is always a “sixth sense” but that’s because percepts, feelings and intuitions always occupy strictly noumenal, mathematical, sinusoidal expressions (“accidentally”, which is to say, dialectically).
2384
2385In the game “God Hand”, the main character’s arm is ripped off at the beginning of the game, and he gets a divine wholly supernatural new arm (the “god hand”) with which to exact a divine punishment, a divine retribution, on Earth. He destroys the bad guys and you can do things like spank the female enemies and bosses! It’s an incredibly vividly imaginative video game; an unforgettable one; which also blends highly right-brained holistic appeals. It features an artistic depiction of a final battle with a dark demon lord incarnating in physical form onto the planet. The “God Hand” is of course the Holy Grail, this time being expressed as a sort of bicameral object with a divine reverence, “allying” itself with the human (the left brain mundane self). This is extreme right brain holism, featuring strong sublimation semantics. Pointed right brain holism is “the religious capacity”. It’s thoroughly inaccessible to science (psychiatry over psychology).
2386
2387
2388
2389“Inflation: identifying with a nonpersonal part of the psyche as though it were acquired individually. A regression into unconsciousness. Positive and negative inflation supercharge the collective unconscious and can alternate. Inflation causes dissolution of the ego into its paired opposites (inferiority/megalomania, good/evil, etc.).
2390
2391“Culturally, our identification with reason and will is an inflation, particularly because with the breakdown of religious and spiritual symbols we can't experience nonpersonal forces as out there, in the realm of the spirits. Ego assimilated by Self or Self by ego both lead to inflation. The solution is a dialog between the two separated entities." 
2392
2393 - A glossary of Jungian terms
2394
2395
2396This is holism being expressed on “objects” like music (because holism can conceptually range over whatever it wants to). If you want a part of the music to enliven you and to depict yourself; your spirit of your soul – that’s what happens. Of course, in dreams and in the unconscious segments of pre-conscious conceptual fitting, we don’t have a full left-brained concept of “person” and so we interweave and cross-examine and cross-define ourselves whenever we act unconsciously in the parts and details sense of overarching conceptual definition (the details; conceptual tail).
2397
2398“I’ll get round to it” (modern saying) – conceptual tail.
2399
2400
2401
2402What is a brain? It’s simply the necessary reflection that to be on a planet and think and walk and talk like we do, we need a certain definiteness of conception (and this exact thought would only be found around this time of the planet where we were so-conscious of all possible ranges to begin with) to carry our left brain selves into action (get out of bed, organize and arrange the day’s life) while the right brain component of us is still firmly seated in the soul. This is simply a reflection of the conceptual math being developed in purely conceptual terms on the one hand (holism) and conceptual terms being fleshed-out in small-scale, highly-granular detail (planetary style “zoning”). The brain reflects a particular generic state of evolution from the scale of the plants (or nonembodied souls) to the divine. All God Game Planet life at our stage, across the cosmos, has brains exactly categorically like ours.
2403
2404
2405“A mind doesn’t need a brain. It can function perfectly well without one. What is true is that it needs a physical brain if it’s to operate in conjunction with a physical body in the physical world of spacetime. A brain in these terms is a physicalization of a mind, and could not exist without a mind. We don’t see any brain in a pile of rock, which has no controlling mind and no agency.”
2406
2407 - Mike Hockney
2408
2409
2410
2411
2412
2413“[Morpheus:] Unfortunately, no one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself.”
2414
2415  - The Matrix (1999)
2416
2417Conceiving is believing! In sinusoids we trust.
2418
2419
2420
2421
2422If you think long and hard about it, even a special object can hold bicameral meaning and Presence through it, which is just the innate properties of Higher Self holistic selection choosing to conceive by ranging its selections of holsitic type (“what I want to achieve and be reminded of”) over some spatiotemporal selection criteria (the piece of jewellery, special gift from a friend, religious artifact replica, Jaynesian god totem object, etc).
2423
2424
2425“[In the movie Ace Ventura: When Nature Calls, the character] Ace Ventura, Pet Detective, returns from a spiritual quest to investigate the disappearance of a rare white bat, the sacred animal of a tribe in Africa.”
2426
2427- Internet Movie Database
2428
2429In other words, the bat secures, coordinates and holds and appropriates the bicameral quality of the bicameral voice of god saying not to disturb it. One of the rotated analogs/symbolisms here is that the tribe Ace enmeshes himself with can’t be communicated (or communed) with, because they don’t speak the right language (in the left brain sense, this is posited to be a Western, colonizing, global monoculture). But dialectically, and holistically, we always find that a “full”, “direct”, objective version of an absolute conveyance has never taken place. The rest of our own subject-object minds have figured in the details. We are the expression as well.
2430
2431You must learn to analyze stories like dreams!
2432
2433
2434Metamorphosis is the grand spiritual act; something closer to the grand concept.
2435
2436The conceptions we had for the perfect relationship got outstripped by our spiritual hyper-consciousness; torn apart by our spiritual capacity. It’s not that others were not intuitive (parallel) enough; but that they were intuitive and deep and genuine in profoundly different ways and configurations, so that life was enjoyed in sporadically different ways. This is still early in the game in a sense. All of the hyper conscious, Divine Future stretches ahead of us. Once you pop the red pill you can’t go back. You will pull this intuitive capacity with you into your next life.
2437
2438It’s the troubled world that first concerns us. That’s spirituality for you! In the future, people will literally be able to rationally define and coordinate what they want from a relationship, in a realm closer to pure thought; pure introversion. “Love everlasting” is the “love” expressed in mathematical supersymmetry. In this view, angels and gods are actually the most loving (it’s just that we can’t see it). We must be smothered with the tough love of the dialectic – only, Collectively because that is the most fair way for the Goddess’ divine children. We are included in the divine equations. Everyone shares the same sky.
2439
2440“People tell me all the time
2441That love is just a state of mind
2442And we all know it’s hard to find
2443That’s why I’m a changing mind”
2444
2445 - Dana Jean Phoenix & Sunglasses Kid -- Summer Breakup (Eighties Electric Soundcastles #7)
2446 
2447
2448
2449
2450"Soul Blazer, released in Japan as Soul Blader (ソウルブレイダー Sōru Bureidā), is an action role-playing game for the Super NES ... The player frees a series of towns by fighting monsters in traditional dungeon crawl battles. Destroying monster lairs in the dungeons causes a soul belonging to a former town occupant to be liberated and reincarnated. This is often a human, but it could be anything from a dolphin to a talking tulip. As souls are freed, the town is reconstructed around the people. The new town occupants give the player advice and items ... The Hero (Blazer) is the protagonist, a divine angel, deity or lesser-deity, or avatar, sent by The Master to restore the world's creatures to life. Skilled with a sword and possessing the ability to speak with any living thing and be understood, he battles the hordes of Deathtoll with the assistance of his Soul helpers. In Illusion of Gaia, he is referred to as "Blazer" by the hidden boss, Solid Arm (Soul Blazer's Metal Mantis) ... Dr. Leo is a scientist ... He also created a series of paintings and models so realistic that one could be drawn into them by touching them. He possesses an empath's level of closeness to nature despite his technological background. His name is a reference to Leonardo da Vinci ... King Magridd is a misguided, easily manipulated king who felt a disconnection from his subjects ... Queen Magridd was seduced by the potential that lurked underneath Dr. Leo's skills, and is the primary catalyst for causing the deal with Deathtoll to occur. She will do anything for power, even after she is betrayed by Deathtoll."
2451
2452    Wikipedia
2453
2454In lucid dreams, you can even touch a painting and feel its texture in three dimensions. Touching a painting to be transported to another dimension - what a wonderfully vivid imaginative boon/boost.
2455
2456In your creativity (creation), you are the Master. Everyone has come to see your glories. Did you pour your soul out?
2457
2458
2459
2460Percepts (contents) can be so vivid that we take them on as our identity. This is conception (mind) choosing to enfold percepts' and contents' qualities (absolutes) into the self. We bring the absolute eternal (conceptual) qualities into the fold of the Self and psyche. We learn how to coordinate syntax (personality) from semantics (story).
2461
2462
2463
2464"The first movie I ever cried at was when I was 10 years old and saw 'The Notebook' in theaters. I was like, 'Whoa, so weird. Crying at a movie? I'm not supposed to do that. So weird.' I didn't know that art could make you do that." - Ansel Elgort
2465
2466The best art, the best creativity, the best spirituality, the best stories (Immortals, Code Geass), should make you cry. Writing your best work, you should feel divine and it should be the most joyous thing you've ever done. You make it your own, but you also draw from the absolute, and that's what makes something significant and powerful and moving.
2467
2468Creativity is your own space, and you don’t have to address things other people want you to. It’s your own bright place; your own bright canvas to shine for the world.
2469
2470It’s far faster to create vivid conceptual pictures in the mind’s eye for whatever purpose you need (such as a silver-white web, the size of a room, splurging itself all over a book, and the narrator says, “it’s the ultimate book! It’s been done!”; the motifs here are about action, splat, expression, compaction as in gunpowder, collossal spread of expression). I am currently sleep deprived so this stuff is just oozing out and I can consciously access it. I can get these thoughts because I symmetrically align myself appropriately with the task (rational maximization principle) I want to be done; I am not looking to unnaturally force anything out of my unconscious in bad faith, but we work together on projects. If you looked around the world as a sensory type, you could be shocked at how “quiet” the world is. But we should note that the angels and the most vividly intuitive of humanity are actually capable of conceptually far superior thoughts to the “visble” individuals and the visible, spacetime-constrained interoperation of souls. What angels are involved in is that which is so conceptual it eclipses all of spacetime activity - with the angels themselves then serving the minimum threshold if they have to keep up appearances as humans with bodies all the time. What do you think angels can do artistically with music and visual art? Far more than you. But the contingent usage conditions and variables for them, the use cases, have dropped out of the equation currently. Earth people force creativity in these kinds of terms. It’s not that we can’t have freely expressive art; but we cannot coordinate art to be highly conceptually inflexional of our rational will over the range of the world and what we can do with it. Imagine you went to an advanced alien race, and they said they didn’t believe in foot soldiers with guns because they had a hand sized mini nuke. It’s a conceptual difference because mind is located in the frequency domain and operates only out of the frequency domain, and its point of dependency is actually independence completely from the “physical” domain. It operates (you know, as if out of a box or an office) out of conception, not anything to do with expression of any kind that is not specifically targeted and in full force towards a particular goal. It’s that exactly and entirely which does not collapse well or commensurately with visual art (rather, the other way around; the tail does not fit with the head; the tail does not wag the dog). Art is percept which is definitionally why angels have nothing to do with spacetime, extensional/extended art. Angels are already the art of the mind in as vivid a purely massively infinitely (“infinite-sinusoidal”) mental a capacity as can be, so why would they do something of a minimization principle and gain a net loss? It’s simply intractible and literally ontologically impossible as an outcome. This will be the same for you in enough centuries or perhaps a few lives. Everyone at the peak of intuitive definition becomes, not “aloof” or “inaccessible” or “jaded” but souls (not to be confused with typical human persons) become godlike and they ascend beyond anyones’ possible expectations. They eclipse expectations. That’s the contingent job of the soul. The eternal job of the soul is to think, by its form, the unit monad.
2471
2472What does consciousness give us? It gives us the means to comfortably and properly select the next thing that would be best or useful or most interesting for us. That’s why thinking, writing and qualifying your sentences are all important. You also need a relaxed environment and the ability to engage pure intuition or intuition and thinking together.
2473
2474Since percepts are the flipside of conception, it is entirely appropriate for humans to have art and music and so on; and thus we reach the thought that angels can tolerate them. Tolerance is conceptual, and it’s in the business (for us) of modelling the minds of the thought systems we range it over.
2475
2476One legendary piece of software is where you can tear a cow apart in 3d. The physics acts like a tough jelly, so the flesh rips open, it jiggles about, and you get to play with it. It was a computer graphics research project with no source code. Plenty “goldilocks” ideas exist, but only certain “goldilocks” ideas are actualizable in very narrow variable circumstances in this type of world. What we have are goldilocks minds in an anti-godilocks spatiotemporal domain. But the mind domain is the true domain, and it holds the most potential.
2477
2478
2479“’Goldilocks Zone’ redirects here. For the more general principle, see Goldilocks principle. For the planet first called ‘Goldilocks’, see 70 Virginis b.
2480‘Habitable zone’ redirects here. For the galactic zone, see Galactic habitable zone.
2481‘Comfort zone (astronomy)’ redirects here. For other uses, see Comfort zone (disambiguation).
2482
2483“In astronomy and astrobiology, the circumstellar habitable zone (CHZ), or simply the habitable zone, is the range of orbits around a star within which a planetary surface can support liquid water given sufficient atmospheric pressure. The bounds of the CHZ are based on Earth's position in the Solar System and the amount of radiant energy it receives from the Sun. Due to the importance of liquid water to Earth's biosphere, the nature of the CHZ and the objects within it may be instrumental in determining the scope and distribution of Earth-like extraterrestrial life and intelligence.
2484
2485“The habitable zone is also called the Goldilocks zone, a metaphor of the children's fairy tale of ‘Goldilocks and the Three Bears’, in which a little girl chooses from sets of three items, ignoring the ones that are too extreme (large or small, hot or cold, etc.), and settling on the one in the middle, which is ‘just right’.”
2486
2487- Wikipedia
2488
2489
2490Scoping is a ranging, selection problem expressed by infinite sinusoids in parallel all the time continuously (The Flowing Point; which is present by every sinusoid collected in the unit monad). As explained by Mike Hockney, souls continually try to attach themselves to things like rocks or lower cellular life, and the highest souls on Earth-like planets can select human bodies to reincarnate back into every time. Selection is actually inherent in the universe, and primary to life (it’s in the conception);- this is what empiricism cannot understand here and can never quite wrap its head around.
2491
2492
2493“What’s the difference between the atoms in the dirt and rock all around us and the atoms in our body? The latter are bound by a special, unique biological code for each of us – DNA. DNA is a mental code produced by Fourier mathematics. Dead matter cannot organise itself into life. Only living minds can organise dead matter into bodies that support life. They do so through the DNA information code: the information code of life on Earth … 
2494
2495“When you become smart enough, you can literally read Nature like a book. “DNA” is a much more interesting chapter of the book than the chapters about rocks, dirt and sand. DNA is the chapter where the characters really come to life (!), when individuals minds start interacting with the lifeless products of the Collective Mind. It’s rather like when people, instead of passively watching TV, start interacting with the TV, as if they were participating in a collective video game. We all control an avatar in the game – our own body. When one body wears out, we get another via reincarnation …
2496 
2497“What is DNA? It’s an ontological code that allows the collectively written book of the world (of Nature) to have individual authors inserted into it, who can then write the book of their own life (via their own actions and behaviour in the physical world). DNA is the mathematical-biophysical code linking the individual mind with the collective mind. Lifeless rock, lacking DNA, reflects only the collective mind, and not any individual minds. Our bodies, encoded with DNA, allow our individual minds to control an avatar (body) in the physical world (the creation of the collective mind). DNA is how individual minds connect to the output of the collective mind, how individual thoughts intersect with collective thoughts, influence them and are in turn influenced by them.”
2498
2499- Mike Hockney
2500
2501
2502
2503
2504
2505
2506You can have the intuition to listen to different music instead, so that the most recent one will later be fresher in mind;- and this in the context of general life optimization in a strictly hyperrational sense. You thought to yourself without verbal consciousness, yet your intuition silently bubbled up and became consciousness. This is a different type of consciousness to the self-aware, social consciousness evolved by language. This is strictly a "god within", "angel archetype", intuitive rational unconscious form of consciousness. It's an abstract form of consciousness which inserts itself forcefully into conscious life (like a divine amulet of kingly power). Individuation via thinking intuitive means delivers this kind of hyperrational capacity. Nothing else ever does. Your unconscious may be emotionally and intuitively alive, but it doesn't just magically come up with things. Only thought, individuation, consciousness, rationality are "magical" as they are the only possible "special pleading" of basis reality. We are talking about acute unconscious mathematical free will, which is of course well-defined within ontological mathematics.
2507
2508Intuition is entirely nonverbal. You must be able to keep quiet for long periods of time to maximize your intuitive capacity. This is how Nietzsche needed complete isolation to think clearly. Intuition is preconscious; preverbal. Hypnopompia gives you incredibly intuitive thoughts exactly because you aren't in any sort of verbal consciousness mode thinking to give weight to embodied life and persona; ego; self. As you make the ontological phase shift to embodied life (waking up), something happens that you usually do (when consciously or deeply unconsciously reflecting) which is where conceptual Tail matches and completes in a convergent similar style to your best habitual spacetime thinking you've been practicing. In other words, hympnopompia is the "accidental" "unintentional" conceptual side-effects of what your best thinking generally has you conceptually select in your conceptual mind. It's being a thinker, and only a highly intuitive thinker, which enables these hypnopompic episodes of extreme clarity of mind. Mystical intuitives and scientists can't do it. Angels have full control because they have a more full whole-range, broad-band conceptual clarity, giving them conscious control of what they're doing (thinking; formulating; conceptualizing; selecting).
2509
2510Everything relates and maps to motivational energy. Something as facetious as including a reference to a song, is not good practice or well formed rational behaviour from a broader conception of the grand scheme of how to emotionally operate constructively as well as highly intuitively and rationally. We intuitively learn to iron out all of this, and the only way to face such dialectical endpoints is to coordinate the right percepts and contents to wash over you. This is a discipline for angels.
2511
2512Through language, we can see the maximization of branching, conceptual Modelling (as it's intercepted and simulated as being recreational in other minds as they parse the sentence). Linguists of empiricist rank (Noam Chomsky) would never get this. Implied in language is selection, which is conceptualization - and all this must spread on a reality with background dependency. Expression, definition, extension are all "virtual", meaning that once we have mathematical thoughts in eternal zero-dimensional reality, and once we share them, these thoughts automatically have mental virtual analytical properties to them which rearrange and organize other thoughts. It's a given, and it comes with any possible basis reality. It stands to reason that if you have any definition, expression or "discussion" at all, it must be capable of selecting and expressing things. If we are not expressing particulars (patterns) themselves then we are expressing whatever creates and gives rise to shapes, lines, definitional form and content in myriad, controllable manipulable artistic ways (picture a photo of beautiful crimson-red diamonds or crystals). These things emphatically are not the percepts in themselves, but whatever can arrange them. That must be what basis reality is "made of", which is exactly that which cannot be made (the PSR and sinusoids and mind and the wavefunction collapse). It's exactly through the wavefunction collapse, and because of the wavefunction collapse, that percepts do not need to "do" anything. Definitionally this has been construed and made so. The PSR means that we get all of the properties and capabilities of the highest expressions via the only possible and the grandest most, exclusive type of existence (with our minds and our sinusoids in their full range). No other possible thoughts outside of this framework are ever actually possible. No existents are possible outside of it. There is no other possible type of reality because of the reflective properties of reason already being implicit in the reasoning act itself. You can't have it both ways beyond reality. You can't have a hypothetical reality which acts as a reality. If your mind is capable of making thoughts about reality, then that reality is already being reflected (potentiated) as part of the structuring of your thought. Reflecting on the nature and form of existence is a Gödelian problem of incompleteness.
2513
2514Sentences are not one-dimensional, they are not derived from one-dimensional math, and that’s the entire point of how you can never syntactically analyze a language that’s bound up in intermixed math domains (human languages refer to endpoints settled on vision, bodily, and Fourier conversion spaces basis). You can’t do it and do it well-formed. Unless somehow Earth language could fully express math using the written word. People like Noam Chomsky think we can learn from studying the analytical patterns in language, but that’s simply not the case. We can of course learn something, but you don’t press on a snail’s body to learn something meta, abstract and far-reaching and wide-ranging. And you can know that you know this. Chomsky said that people don’t know that they don’t know (referring to the system at large). We can certainly coordinate and orchestrate our own knowledge for ourselves, rather than worrying over what everyone else is doing wrong in its last conceptual detail. Knowledge and thought (conception) ranges over the full terrain and detail of a full set of ontological mathematical sinusoids of infinite count.
2515
2516What does the inner god do? It certainly isn’t apologetic of its own circumstances (the things it has to do), no matter what the flavour, content and arrangement these appear in. It does as it must do to advance everyone, despite the kicking and screaming of others or the lack thereof. Here we are actually arriving at the holistic conception of the Self not being anything to do with its face, body, material circumstances, past recent experiences or lack thereof, and so on. We are approaching the divine. The divine is what Bruce Lee said was “formless” i.e. this is actually to say that it’s what’s free of particulars which are binding of its next act. Strictly ontologically speaking, this is never possible for monads. We will always produce a next ontological thought. But it’s in the (protracted) contingent quality of our thoughts and our shared thoughts, rangings and our (matter-) expressions, that we deliver a dialectic of moving thought; thought that gets purer and purer and dissolves (for all actual contingency which is also of the contingent background of the absolute) into something less-contingently-binding-so in more-desirable (“super narrower”) parameters. That’s what conception delivers us the power to do, which no other type of universe categorically could.
2517
2518Angels = Narrow Light Steppers = photon masters = phosters. 
2519
2520You aren’t your best self when you’re around other people. You’re your best self when you dialectically, sinusoidally, face your highest work. This is what angels know acutely.
2521
2522Angel Psyche in the face of dialectical(ly) dead strands;- “no cause for it; not your problem”. This must be found dialectically. This is categorically the problem.
2523
2524
2525
2526
2527
2528In the theme song "The Ecstasy of Gold" from the film "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly", are the highly unconscious sentiments for qualia surrounding finally getting there; building up to something monumental in achievement; making the grade after all the time and effort expended and all the resistances faced and opposed. You couldn't make it up. Music subjectively allows us to reflect and refract the contents of our own souls (subjective conception is being played using phenomena of percept). This can only happen in a type of universe which innately has conception and conceptualization built into it. Percepts alone cannot generate anything, but a mind can know and expound upon and reflect effectively infinite Subjective things due to its detailed wavefunction shape and terrain, which has effectively infinite variance and utility in order to cross-reflect and cross-compare in potentially cross-domain style for all of time and space (events; people; interactions; choices; scenarios and circumstance!). Mind mathematically is able to "individuate math" exactly because, through embodied spatiotemporal suspension, mind is operating and cross-mirroring multiple mathematical domains at once (the bodily senses; the visual mathematical transformational space; the hand-to-eye coordination transformational space; the left brain localism of spacetime; the right brain frequency domain; pleasure and pain; organizational sensory and aesthetic artistic considerations; physical principles of energy and work such as in springs; rational neocortex thinking and rational analysis). These intermingling aspects of mathematics; this sporadic array unified by the conceptual selection of the monad (different parts like our bodily sense organs and our visuals and our ability to manipulate muscles and to tell if people are looking at us) are what intermix to differentiate and define myriad percepts, concepts and conceptual dialectical states, reformations and resolutions. (Adding onto this, we also have semantics versus syntax, and subjectivity versus objectivity.)
2529
2530"The Ecstasy of Gold" is Outlaw Archetype music which is particularly unmissable because it elevates The Outlaw Archetype in the face of gnosis and The God Archetype. This is a strange convergence (strange loop) which straddles 1) Goddess appeals (numinous female vocals), 2) emotional and soothing appeal when facing the challenges of life on the Self; 3) the emergence of the “Outlaw King” (hidden face of the Hero, the God within) and 4) the marking of The Outlaw’s ascension to God, showing that he was “the real deal” all the time. In the video of The Danish National Symphony Orchestra’s performance for this, this high semantic meaning is being underscored by the projection of a silhouette of The Outlaw Archetype on a high wall. As ever, it’s percepts which inform contingent conceptions of concepts, which then “only happen by accident” (science’s “anecdotal” demons/skeletons in the closet) to happen to subjectively (parallell-ly) serve our springboard to gnosis and logos and neocortex thinking. Once you pop, you don’t stop. It’s semantics which bridge the gap, also, in a primary (subject-object) way and fashion, towards god. God is everywhere and in every thing, in exactly this manner. This is because higher expressions of god (conception) can always be found in parallel reflection within/from one another, as interpenetrating one another (because as empiricism fails to realize(!), the self is involved in the conception which interpenetrates the self).
2531
2532Summoned or not, the god will come. In the end, The Hero always comes out of us, and this is an earlier prerequisite stage of finding the True Self. The Outlaw travels alone, in definition to find himself/herself.
2533
2534“Jung carved a Latin inscription above the door of his house in Kusnacht, Switzerland: "VOCATUS ATQUE NON VOCATUS DEUS ADERIT." In English translation, the inscription reads: ‘Called or not called, the god will be there.’”
2535
2536- jungnewyork.com
2537
2538Ride your high horse hard and fast! Feel the ecstasy of the divine bounding!
2539
2540
2541
2542“Red Hare (赤兔馬, Chìtùmǎ (pinyin), Sekitoba (onyomi)) is a horse from the Three Kingdoms era, said to have a startling red mane and speed as quick as any rabbit. It is speculated to be a Ferghana horse, though a very large one. The animal was fabled to have been a swift and powerful stallion able to run 1,000 li (li is an old Chinese unit. One li is about 500 meters) in a single day and 800 li in a single night.
2543
2544“In the games, it is the fastest horse and the default mount for Lu Bu and Guan Yu; while the latter in Dynasty Warriors 3 rode on a normal horse in specific stages (most notably the "What-If" scenarios in Xtreme Legends), he would even ride it in levels before the former's death, such as Hulao Gate (which only applies as of Dynasty Warriors 4).
2545
2546“In the third installment of Dynasty Warriors, it was well-known that most of the time, the player's rank would not be high enough to ride the horse, thus it would always knock them off, even if they were Lu Bu themselves. However, a select few were able to ride even the CPU Lu Bu's Red Hare in the Challenge mode stages, such as Dong Zhuo and Zhang Jiao.
2547
2548“As of the seventh installment, Red Hare is also physically the biggest horse in the series, as leaping off of it gives more air time compared to other horses.”
2549
2550- Wikia
2551
2552Guan Yu in Chinese culture is the god of war, and certain police stations in China contain statues of Guan Yu.
2553
2554
2555“Today, Guan Yu is still widely worshipped by the Chinese, and many shrines to him are found in homes, businesses and fraternal organisations. In Hong Kong, a shrine to Guan Yu can be found in every police station. Though by no means mandatory, Chinese police officers worship and pay respect to him. Although seemingly ironic, members of the triads and Heaven and Earth Society worship Guan Yu as well. Statues used by triads tend to hold the halberd in the left hand, and statues in police stations tend to hold the halberd in the right hand. This signifies which side Guan Yu is worshipped, by the righteous people or vice versa. The appearance of Guan Yu's face for the triads is usually more stern and threatening than the usual statue. In Hong Kong, Guan Yu is often referred to as "Yi Gor" (二哥; Cantonese for "second elder brother") for he was second to Liu Bei in their fictional sworn brotherhood. Guan Yu is also worshipped by Chinese businessmen in Shanxi, Hong Kong, Macau and Southeast Asia as an alternative wealth god, since he is perceived to bless the upright and protect them from the wicked. Another reason is related to the release of Cao Cao during the Huarong Trail incident, in which he let Cao and his men pass through safely. For that, he was perceived to be able to extend the lifespan of people in need.” 
2556
2557- Wikipedia
2558
2559
2560
2561Everything you say must “come in the right context”. We are weavers of context and delivery (Style). This is noticably true when you share something highly personal, like a dream record – you might imagine people would “get it”, but no: it always has to come bundled in the right context, so that people get the message that you were able to reproduce for yourself when you went over that content with your mind. The inclusion of context means to supply someone else with the necessary means to reconstruct that information the same way in their own minds (we are giving them a conception and pointing(!) the way). This is exactly what writing intends to achieve when writing is about neocortex logos contents. That’s why writing philosophy expands the mind and enlivens your intelligence. It presses and forces you into reformative thinking (conception; conceptualization).
2562
2563Oscar Wilde said “It is what you read when you don't have to that determines what you will be when you can't help it”. Writing works in a very similar way. Writing will expand your soul when you don’t have to so you will inflex higher concept the next time you are prompted for it.
2564
2565Always take the next intellectual challenge offered in principle by your unconscious. Always move the frame; the Overton Window of your conceptual capacity. Always press yourself to reach for your better nature. Your Higher Self will have tried to prompt you about this (in abstract, deeply unconscious sentiments) during your teenage years.
2566
2567It’s very easy to say unconsciously, “I don’t care” and to reject the thought bubbling up from the unconscious. It’s easy to shut your mind down. You have to struggle at first before breaking through. We have to choose using the maximization principle. (And this sums up all of selection in human behaviour – everything to do with our sex lives, our social media lives, the connections we hold with people, our rational and career selections, NASA, and so on).
2568
2569Always operate between the lines at the implicit, subtle, unspoken unwritten-rules level. The next major dialectical strand after this and massively sharpening your intuition, is deciding to think conceptually as much as possible i.e. in terms of pure conception and meta conception. You achieve this by being a thinking intuitive cognitive type. You try to reach for pure unconscious math to figure out things, and you consciously select neocortex thinking, rather than spending time in emotional swamps and extroversion interdependency. To achieve this level of autonomy, you must rationally figure out how you exist apart from everyone else in your own right, and how this works for you, and how you do or don’t need anyone to provide you with things. You must meet interesting people and learn from them, then integrate a monumental amount of thinking and intuition about the world and how your life maps to objectivity in various ways, shapes and forms.
2570
2571
2572The last irreducible thing must be everything and nothing. It must be capable of swaying/changing the world and the private outcomes but also it can't be definitionally apart from these things; it must present these as the innate capacities of thought itself. Thought must neither be able to Express outside of the boundaries of this last irreducible thing. The soul is the last irreducible thing of contingent life. The soul is thus the constellated concept around which mathematical conception-units (monads) have organized their thoughts and feelings and impressions and sentiments and expressions (public art and PR demonstrations like filling the streets with a soft drink or sending someone to fall onto Earth). In reality, there is the objective collection of mathematical sinusoids, and this is the essential ontological structure which is even allowing us to converge thoughts and weave narratives and categories and conceptions (selections). A selection is also about significance, fancy, and expression.
2573
2574
2575Memes are about symmetry. Comedy and punchlines are about symmetry. Maximization of symmetry means everyone must wait to laugh together at the punchline. Since souls are all free executing agents of selection, they unconsciously all choose to wait until the punchline can be guaranteed for everyone and so that they can all laugh together. In a world where individual people watched comedy isolated from all other people inside of the comedy TV context, they wouldn't have learned this. (And scientists would never find a gene for comedy punchlines).
2576
2577
2578Thesis: bicameral command from a god (Abrahamism; bad Master)
2579
2580Antithesis: no command; unindividuated autonomy (radicalism; Rage Against The Machine); intellectualism; isolated consciousness
2581
2582Synthesis: command by the unconscious will of the many and by conceptual rationalistic justice (rational Superego); following the instruction of the Goddess archetype (Abraxian spirituality); following the god within.
2583
2584Code Geass and Soul Blazer can be said to follow this pattern. Code Geass is very subtly an exploration in the divine properties of bicameralism, free will and thus hyper consciousness. It dialectically draws the viewer into a conscious contemplation because it is a highly well formed content (percept). The properties of percepts (Content) thus must rationally act on conceptual minds (Form) in the capacity that the mind can now freely select something which is better and more pertinent, significant and powerful/inflexional. Certain stories that "entertain" well formed thoughts about future circumstances in interesting rational eventualities (i.e. proper conceptual modelling in story form) generate the most thought-provoking results or the most highly rational conceptual thought-provoking results. Death Note is a story which entertains the political and psychological and sociological consequences of archons appearing to individually guide and advise strongly willed souls. You can see here, definitionally, that the potentials for interesting (better) outcomes are starting to emerge. In a universe of no background dependency, this wouldn't be possible strictly because all percepts must be arbitrary and non-binding of better thoughts by essential definition. But as that isn't true, all interesting content by our own Subjective definition must have "highly intuitive properties". The key is in how we frame things: percepts don't generate life or inform concept/form; but concept and form of course does have substance which shifts and transforms as it looks over different things. For a quick and dirty analogy, consider the Eye of Sauron from Lord of the Rings. It is a conceptual existent (a mind) yet the percepts it rolls its eye over determine different things in the cause of its eventual will and actions. The percepts don't make the mind but they make its conceptual interactions when plugged into conceptual mind's conceptual "contents". All percepts affect us, some in highly profound ways, and that's the proof of interaction between Form and Content. The conceptual tail to all this is the wrap-around conditionality (all souls). You are a living breathing creation of your world, and it’s that which you need to change (you need to create a miracle) in order to achieve true fullest freedom. You need to spellbind reality itself. What is a spell? It’s a concept.
2585
2586
2587We do indeed develop a bicameral voice for the god within, which gives us spontaneous holistic bits of advice like "do it that way then". This is the daemon; the inner god or the inner angel or the guiding spirit.
2588
2589" Daemons work in the background and (usually...) don't belong to a TTY that's why you can't use stdout/stderr in the way you probably want. Usually a syslog daemon (syslogd) is used for logging messages to files (debug, error,...) ... Besides that, there are a few required steps to daemonize a process."
2590
2591    - Stack Overflow
2592
2593
2594This voice speaks your formulation of the principle of maximization (optimizing your life via thoughts which intuitively race ahead to anticipate best outcomes under stress). Stress creates the bicameral right brain capacity of advising the left brain in the best way that it can (the darling accomplice that it is).
2595
2596Once we have dialectically evolved the bicameral voice through an intense introverted "third person bounce" conscious intuitive "inner dialogue" or inner dialectic, the bicameral voice starts to "say" things at opportune moments.
2597
2598What does the bicameral voice say?
2599
2600
2601“Only initiate with women you really respect and are interested in.” - The Anima Archetype
2602
2603"Select someone good for you, who inspires you and gives something back - don't get attached wrongly" - The Anima Archetype
2604
2605"Stop explaining everything, in attraction - start living it. It's how you behave, and it's how you prioritize" - The Anima Archetype
2606
2607"Love is your territory. It's yours for us, and all of us -- each-other; all who can." - The Anima Archetype
2608
2609"What are you after? Present yourself based on that." - The Anima Archetype
2610
2611
2612"Of course it would.. pressure would be requisite with your circumstances you collapsed for yourself" - The Angel Archetype
2613
2614"You don't own her.. no-one owns her soul.. and no-one will have her into her next life.. she will be eventually sent to a Higher Self soul" - The Angel Archetype
2615
2616"Human pain, ah.. you're such a lightweight" - The Archon Archetype
2617
2618"What a pitiful display for an evolved human." - The Archon Archetype
2619
2620"Get ahold of yourself" - The Sister Anima Archetype
2621
2622"Depersonalize it" - The Archon Archetype
2623
2624
2625“We have many more lives to get you through, human” - The Archon Archetype
2626
2627“You are angry because you were cheated out of your love. But you can only resolve the reason of souls meeting, not Yourself through guilt or shame, or the Other through blame.” - The Goddess Archetype
2628
2629“The world is not only on your shoulders. You are allowed to have your own private space of experience.” - The Goddess Archetype
2630
2631“..Yet much worse things happen every day, my Hero – and you are the saviour of the human race” – The Goddess Archetype
2632
2633“You miss the female form?.. This one is surely joking.” - The Archon Archetype
2634
2635“There is only so much you can do, before you have arisen” - The Goddess Archetype
2636
2637“You will be vindicated.” - The Goddess Archetype
2638
2639
2640"Whatever Specters haunt you, are your own calling to your frame of mind, via the unconscious" ― The Angel Archetype
2641
2642"You will get nowhere without full knowledge" - The Archon Archetype
2643
2644"Why would you not have the same allowances that everyone else has?" - The Angel Archetype
2645
2646"You are needed. Your people need you. You are valuable. Your best gifts need to be nurtured and provided within you." ― The Goddess Archetype
2647
2648"The most important thing.. is that you remain functional in your capacity to be responsive and be here for the rest of us." ― The Anima Archetype
2649
2650“You must understand that this is just a chapter of your Soul Line. You will meet more like <her> again.” - The Anima Archetype
2651
2652"What do we have here.. the main charge is that others have what you don't. What do we want to create with this?" ― The Goddess Archetype
2653
2654
2655"Everything is only a mathematical signal -- how could it own you?" - The Angel Archetype
2656
2657"You must remember that these Earth events are events concerning the bodies and minds of souls in sync with world trends -- and that these poor souls will all be saved by perfect divine reason; the divine judgement" - The Angel Archetype
2658
2659"What you achieve is not appliccable to only you; it has a shared nature" - The Goddess Archetype
2660
2661"There will always be more experiences in the world.. there aren't more of you. You made the right choice." - The Goddess Archetype
2662
2663"They've played a war against you. But you must win." - The Anima
2664
2665"So you've learned the darkest facts of the world -- and who can relate to those traumas, other than you? Hence it is useless to carry them." - The Anima
2666
2667"But it is possible to continue to exist knowing the full extent of the monsters and all the world's horrors. In fact, that is a strength." - The Angel Archetype
2668
2669
2670“No experience is bigger than you.” - The Animus Archetype [this statement was spoken from myself inside a dream, to a woman;- in the dream I had acted as her Animus figure]
2671
2672"If you get this right, divine orgasms will rain down on your world." - The Goddess Archetype
2673
2674
2675Archon = Bad Cop
2676
2677Phoster = Good Cop
2678
2679Abraxas = Inner God; Obscured God; Hidden God; True God (you)
2680
2681
2682“‘Good cop/bad cop’ routine, also called joint questioning or friend and foe, is a psychological tactic used in negotiation and interrogation. ‘Good cop/bad cop’ tactics involve a team of two interrogators who take apparently opposing approaches to the subject. The interrogators may interview the subject alternately or may confront the subject at the same time … 
2683
2684“The ‘bad cop’ takes an aggressive, negative stance towards the subject, making blatant accusations, derogatory comments, threats, and in general creating antipathy between the subject and himself. This sets the stage for the ‘good cop’ to act sympathetically, appearing supportive and understanding, and in general showing sympathy for the subject. The good cop will also defend the subject from the bad cop. The subject may feel they can cooperate with the good cop either out of trust or out of fear of the bad cop. They may then seek protection by and trust the good cop and provide the information the interrogators are seeking.
2685
2686“This technique also has its disadvantages in that it can be easily identified and the ‘bad cop’ may alienate the subject.”
2687
2688- Wikipedia
2689
2690This is exactly the dialectical process we are seeing, which is binding in the nature of parallellism and symmetry in the monad. First the Archon archetype comes to build strength and resilience in you; the dejected troubled Warrior or Fallen Hero finds his footing through the Archon archetype, which seeks to build strength of character (antipathy of shame towards the self, and antipathy towards the society via their “weakness”). Later on when such a proven strand and development has been made that endless wisdoms and dialectics are being transmissioned, there now runs the risk of being too unbalanced towards what in Star Wars terms is the temptation of the Dark Side. In such a capacity, the Superego enters the stage in a breathtakingly even more nuanced form, delivering a swelling new emanation from the most imaginative point in the psyche: an opposing, starkly outshining dialectical opposite to put grand shame to the Archon’s presence and bits of cynical, Last Man seeming advice (when faced with this new, overpowering, light, incredibly bright context). We picture the subsuming of all the Lower Self into pressing new contents of the divine reach, grace and vault of the human will. We are overcome with the numinous. The Archon may appear in the mind’s eye more visually than conceptually at times; as shrouded in black smoke; with the Phoster deliberately building into the reaches of such dialectics as to have broad silky white swan-like wings, and to fly down into a conceptual bedroom window rather than appear to walk. The Phoster immediately and invariably puts the Archon to shame when he graces your presence, because the Phoster is so incredibly highly individuated so as to immediately conceptually be thought to cater for all the responses and proper acts of divine ordering of life. The Archon simply does not have this capacity, but rather begs the special pleading of a divine prominence in the hierarchy in life, and is distinctly lazy as much as he is intuitive, “afraid” of his emotional vulnerability and compassion. The Phoster is everything you ever wanted to see in an Animus character, like the gilded angels from your highest reaches of conceptions of the divine from stories drawn across life.
2691
2692The “voices” stop as soon as you don’t need them. You definitionally and categorically do not need them anymore (just like your Anima/Animus) when those unconscious contents have been duly “fulfilled”. Their conditionalities have gone; they have dropped out of the mental equation.
2693
2694Archon = dependable and independence. “Charm manipulator”. Spiritual Willpower. Advisor on the book of secrets of private gain.
2695
2696Phoster = utmost thorough outputs to life; gives immense self-sacrifice but without becoming unbalanced. “Effortless charm”. Spiritual Altruism. Zero interest in private gain.
2697
2698
2699In the anime Death Note, archons (called “death gods”) can see numbers above peoples’ heads denoting their day and time of death, as well as their full name; and the death god can write in its Death Note conceptual extensions (qualifiers) for how someone is to die – such as the cause of death, and the time, to give just a few examples. This is the conceptual power (i.e. actually a Grail Object) lent to the humans surrounding the plot which takes place. In Death Note one of the female archons falls in love with a soul currently in a female body, and this spells the end for her ultimately because her obsession with another soul carries a weakness which is ruthlessly exploited by the Machiavellian main character, Yagami Light. Light is a hybridized ENTJ/INTJ character while his rival, L, is an INTP/INTJ hybrid.
2700
2701
2702
2703
2704For us to have drama and dialectical response, we have to be inspired. Stress is a conceptual kind of thesis inspiration, which is why the right brain can work with it and pass back a holistic frequency response. Stories like Death Note are wildly imaginatively inspiring. The talking face on the Egg of the King in Berserk is vividly imaginative (as is vomiting up all different colours inside a dream). Vivid imagination is always composed in right brain terms (psychodrama, holistic imaginary scenes, dramatic appearances, special powers, dramatic emotion, extremes of expression, vivid performance, the world stage, excitation of possible outcomes).
2705
2706Why are Hero Stories so inspirational? It's because they pose fourth wall challenges to ourselves in psychological elements and terms compatible with the right brain (setting, scenario, drama, holism). That's why the right brain can be impressioned by well written stories. It's a conceptual difference (broad-band), not an additive difference.
2707
2708“A picture paints a thousand words” = holism.
2709
2710The bicameral voice is strictly dialectical and strictly responsive over a given scenario (as we would definitionally expect of something irreducible).
2711
2712One means to get a booming, intimidating bicameral voice (the old primordial, loud, distinctly audible, ancient one) is Sleep Paralysis. People report auditory hallucinations and people seem to think auditory hallucinations are linked to Sleep Paralysis. The voice can be clear, commanding and intimidating (although some people report hearing an angelic voice). These voices (percepts) must be informed by the unconscious trends, fluctuations and neuroses that underlie our waking life and Self/Ego/psyche. The unconscious (as in dreams) is the underbelly of what we are in our waking lives. It is always present. The right brain, The Higher Self, and the unconscious are always present to varying degrees.
2713
2714
2715
2716"Samatarou is not just an average high-school boy, the truth is that he is the son of a god, his mother is a goddess and his sisters are candidates to become goddesses. They are living in the human world, because they want their boy to learn about the human customs and the habits of the creatures that they are protecting, so that in this way Samatarou will become a better god. Tenko is a angel assigned to look after Samatarou. She's born the same day, same year as Samatarou and have been close friends ever since. Life seems normal but things start to change with the appearance of a transfer student named Kumiko. Samatarou falls in love with her and from now on, things will be a lot more different for him. His decision of making her fall in love with him without using his powers will put him in trouble."
2717
2718    MyAnimeList (Kamisama Kazoku page)
2719
2720Stories reflect the different aspects of the psyche that we would love to be real and realized (either in the world at large, or privately for ourselves). Some stories are highly idealistic, yet they reflect entirely rational compatible elements and structures for our conceptual minds to work on/with. We "like" the stories that we can conceptually conceive interesting conceptual details with ("conceptual phenomena"). Dreams are "conceptual phenomena". In your typical vivid dreams, you don't actually organize a physical atomic sandpit space as such, but your understanding of events, interactions and sequences are conceptual. All dreaming is conceptual in the sense that it is created out of conceptual piecemeal composition of the sinusoidal elements, functions of sinusoids, and conditions and variables. In lucid dreaming, we are even able to think about how to arrange our own body's motions in a spatial environment by our pure conscious will. It's as though the mind has its own existence in itself, living on its own terms, able to arrange and coordinate superstructures of conception (matter and bodily locomotion) entirely independently. Percepts can't dream. Only conceptual units (minds) can dream. Dreaming implies ontological sinusoidal expressional freedom within a background dependent reality (as in ontological mathematics).
2721
2722Stories mathematically take the place of multiple artificial bicameral voices. If you were an angel, you would have at your disposal the ability to call upon (as bicameral voices) angels, goddesses, demons, and so on. Sparda from the Devil May Cry mythos is a highly capable archon figure who falls in love with a human woman, giving birth to two nephilim sons (Dante and Vergil) with superhuman demon-slaying powers.
2723
2724We “like” what we conceptually intermesh with. That comes with the conception.
2725
2726
2727What we accomplish for one another is the divine stretch, reach, dimension and capacity of life. When you're just here in your flesh not doing anything other than feeling and sensing, this isn't the you that produces monumental work. You can become conscious of this. This is what it means to have a conceptual mind. What's built out of concepts is never necessarily perceptual, while what's built out of percepts is always necessarily conceptual!
2728
2729
2730We'll go back to revisit our earlier question about matter being intimately wedded to mind. Matter is always written on an absolute canvas, so it's by nature absolute mathematics. Percepts have no such natural unifying properties - so it's not that mind can be intimately, continuously and constantly tied to this in conceptual shape. That is to say, mind and matter have no consistent relationship whatsoever - since matter is on the backdrop or canvas of absolute sinusoidal expression, and cannot have any binding conceptual inherent linkage to mind in this capacity. Mind is wholly and definitionally separate from matter, and the reference space is absolute which means there's no such thing as a relative scale of varying, waveform-latitudinal difference (disparities) to ever match any matter pattern to any mind. Mind is what's actually definitionally separate from matter in this sense. You can't have matter mirror mind, because this is how mind and matter are fundamentally, foundationally different. Mind is a conceptual form which produces thoughts which are expressed in the spatiotemporal frequency range as matter. Mind wholly and fundamentally is conceptual, broad-band and definitional. Matter is the afterglow, the after-effects of what mind defines. Matter can't be related in any patterned way, all across the band, to mind (not in ontological form; only via Fourier mathematical transform which is contingent). Mind and matter have no essential fundamental similarities in this sense.
2731
2732What mind does is it conceptualizes based on concepts and conceptualization (sinusoidal components composed together) and this is what produces thoughts. Matter's frequency patterns are only ever intelligible or observable or conceptualizable whatsoever when matter signals (frequencies) are grouped together. Vision is bound by this principle, which is a concept. The collection of things (individual frequencies and sinusoids) is itself a concept. You don't stare at a visual display of some objects up against a wall and have the thought come instantly to you; your mind must unconsciously deliberate (shovel forward) a certain kind of disposition by which it "picks up" and processes that objective group of perceptual frequency data into something it intuitively understands. For the mind to bubble up thoughts from the unconscious, these thoughts must always take shape bubbling up from the lowest level, which must be a selective mathematical conception of some kind. The mind "iteratively", "deterministically" finds the types of thoughts that it wants, to benefit itself in the abstract long-run (which is given by further concept i.e. the Selector Function) and this is indeed what allows us to even think (varyingly i.e. in a breakdown pattern and strategy!) of the things which come across our visual field. If we've looked at an object on the wall and noticed(!) that there's distinct individual objects, what this has meant is that the mind has invented(!) its own generalized strategies to discern mathematical, hard, geometrical patterns and routines, and come out to (conceptually) "distinguish" something at the end. That is fed directly into the next thought, going via conception and mathematical expression (just as in any mathematical equation you can also express more additions, divisions, subtractions and the like, as much as you want).
2733
2734The great untold secret of Mind is that we don’t have three-dimensional existence of a “bodily” “dimensionality” like we have 2 arms;- but we have infinite sinusoidal “feelers” [as in tentacles] to configure and this is the ontological form (i.e. it’s necessary) for how thought works. We don’t get the option to add from some external part that’s not reality, how much we will fold the number 5 into our next thought. It comes already as given! That is what mind actually is. Consider that in computer programming, every attempt to inject something into the information manipulation (like a shaking effect for a web browser window; and then the window resizing code part; and then how to check where the mouse cursor is and report that) is, in the code syntax, always definitionally active. Each called program function is always fired anyway for it to be active (like the key press checks for when you will type something on the Internet), and the conditionality is what’s really being “changed”. The conditonality (the whole broad band conception) is the actual “cause” for things to be done differently. Holism and holism only is substance, not part (percept). Definition escapes empirical analysis for exactly this reason, because it’s not derivable from evidential trails only. It patently doesn’t live in the land of evidential trails, but it itself (conception) weaves them around everywhere as if it’s constructing its own dream environment. Scientists are trapped in dreams, and the conscious humans can become gods in a process of life: the living mystery.
2735
2736The thing about conceptual existence is that as soon as you state that everything which Does Exist has conceptual constitution – you have actually (conceptually) eliminated anything from having to exist, which can’t be wrapped up in a concept or conception somewhere else by other conceptual means. (So – for anything that “wants to” exist, it can actually be wrapped or provided or expressed conceptually somewhere else, by some other “conceptive” capacity). Isn’t that amazing!?- But as empiricists would rightly point out here, that doesn’t justify reality in itself. That’s why we have ontological mathematics with the infinite range of sinusoids; the unit monad; the monadic collective; the PSR (the Principle of Sufficient Reason); the wavefunction collapse, which – these all make it make sense, when you conceive of it. (Concepts are just the side-effect of the “math on paper”; thinking “conceptually” is just ontological math in a different flavour). As soon as it clicks, we can actually confirm for ourselves this “strange loop” nature of conceptual existence;- the fact that we used conceptual existence to talk about and define for the very first time, this notion of ultimate full wrap-around conceptual existence.. actually brings us to question how that was possible including it (the new content of thought!) as the defined framework for how we originated the idea. The only possible conclusion for Illuminists is that conception is reality and mind is conception (or monads engage in the act of conception, and habitually conceptualize by definition). The only possible conclusion in a dimensional aspect is that conception didn’t occur in a piecemeal, Percepts-only-universe way and that reality converges regularly on multiple dimensions meeting (at) a convergent subjective “truth”. The infinite sinusoidal “feelers” [as if tentacles] furnish exactly this type of mechanism as basis reality.
2737
2738The humanly beautiful thing is that the word Conception also dovetails with birth and new embodied persons.
2739
2740Angels have key individuated conscious or unconscious knowledge of how their infinite range of “feelers” work in parallel (i.e. parallel thinking about parallel thinking at scale), which makes a primary difference between angels and humans.
2741
2742We might say that thought comes in two major strands: parallel and dialectical.
2743
2744The right brain was “annoyed” with the left brain because it always knew it was essentially right about the meaning of life and how it should be. It had some immature aspirations and reaches (bad intuitive specialization but not bad intuitive holism) but it got us here in the end, guided by highly right-brain appeals such as Sousei no Aquarion, Code Geass and Kingsman. These stories can utterly change your life.
2745
2746
2747The story of the soul is the story of evolutionary mathematics (ontological mathematics).
2748
2749The “inspiration” in Perceptual form for this book included the ultimate Percepts.. custom text transformation of The God Series; filtering it for what’s needed or of interest (selection is conception). Imagine you had the greatest series of books, but they could be arranged in any way you wanted. That is the conceptual version of the thing being conveyed here. The example is what we give conceptual detail to! We package it along and say to it “off you go”. It comes in the perceptual form we give to it (we could have lied, for example). But we can add as much conceptual detail as we want (since we live by the extension of spacetime, in these terms – and we can supplant spacetime matter with as much content expressed conceptually via absolute math as we want to).
2750
2751The Id drive: “I want pleasure to come next now; when am I getting my next pleasure?”
2752
2753The autonomy drive: “I don’t know what comes next now; I will try to settle some strands of what needs to be done.”
2754
2755In computing, the full picture isn’t even conceptually completed with the program runtime, the dynamic program state (it can have multiple executing threads in race conditions; you can also have multiple instances of the same program), and the form for the code execution paths (the function linkage to system/custom code libraries, and the syntax trees). There’s also constructs like try/catch, where an exception gets “caught” and the program execution flow drops out of whatever scope it’s in back to a safe rerouting functionality (you can thus avoid a full program crash by wrapping isolated parts of the program). Notice how all of this is provided – even in the compiled computer code potential – as one consistent broad band mathematical concept. Minds are conception and engage in conception and conceptualization. Conceptualization, we can think of, as a more “style descriptive” concept akin to being able to explain the conceptualizing differences between Abrahamic souls and Illuminated souls – how they conceptualize of the reality and the world around them. Conception is thought itself in its most essential, irreducible capacity. Conception is also how you conceive (the form).
2756
2757
2758
2759Look at this earlier statement from earlier in the book;-
2760
2761“Percepts alone cannot generate anything, but a mind can know and expound upon and reflect effectively infinite Subjective things due to its detailed wavefunction shape and terrain, which has effectively infinite variance and utility in order to cross-reflect and cross-compare in potentially cross-domain style for all of time and space (events; people; interactions; choices; scenarios and circumstance!).”
2762
2763The mindfuck here is that, since Riemennian conceptual sinusoidal signals (sinusoids) can have no static, absolute, “stubborn” nature to them, they also cannot have any such “stubborn”, “land-locked” or consistently-continuously-active contingent natures on them – giving the nature that – the only, the principal and the categorically fully thru-possible way that we can ever arrive at Definition, is literally ontologically by banging the conceptual natures (analytical full-infinitely-dimensional-sinusoidal webs) together and not(ic)ing their differences. Note that this is a Gödelian incompleteness rendering problem (and a distinctly conceptual such aspect) which means that .. the abolute is always rendered in the contingent, by the contingent, and never otherwise (never outside of the contingent). Note further that we could only ever “Gödelianly” reach such a thought of a contingent, strictly-contingent basis i.e. it is signalled via this paragraph and your mind has to be in a high-particular state (contingent mental thoughts with a “formless” ontological form) basis to receive/appreciate it! What a world. This renders fully and completely (and qualified within a contingent thought!) that life is <what we say it is> and also life is conceptually complete. Life, in this sense (in whichever way it is now contingently framed by any monad ranging conception on this sentence for its subjective self) has now been conceptually closed. Phew!
2764
2765Riemennian Conception as expressed in the paragraph above has Eclipsed Together;- 1) the current thought and the current mind that’s expressing it, 2) The Selector Function, 3) the mind-space, 4) the sinusoidal range of infinite dimensions, 5) the unit monad, 6) the monadic collective, 7) the connection (selection) with the Collective Unconscious, Astral Sex, Shared Lucid Dreaming, and the capacity thereof in the unit monad, 8) infinite range of sinusoids as oppositional to infinite minds in the Singularity, 9) The Omega Point and how exactly to get there, 10) the realization of conscious reflection that this is the exact type and nature of thought which is being proposed. The result of all this (the Riemennian Conception) is absolute zero, and it’s another particular type of expression of 0 = 0, necessarily and contingently available in multiple monads at once (for example, gods and angels). This necessarily and categorically must be so. (And as we can do it ourselves right now, and conceptualize this right now without sensing any fault or incompleteness with this thought, it is shown that it’s well-formed). It also necessarily and categorically 1) cannot hold arbitrarily threaded position and configuration (as if a strange crooked line, static, moving across all sinusoids in only one place and style in particular), and 2) must be conceptually available by other sinusoidally means for other minds and 3) must be something which reduces in radically different but relevant/valid (contingent!) ways during the closing to The Omega Point (in actuality).
2766
2767Basis fully-conceptually-settled and -satisfied reality must include the capacity to connect to the Collective Unconscious = everyone else, and also as in the case of Astral Sex and Shared Lucid Dreaming which have to be folded as no more mere special cases of reality, i.e. all monads must be involved in the true grand conceptual wrapping around true ontological infinity and true ontological zero in the highest expressive sense of what these (conceptual) capabilities actually are.
2768
2769You necessarily and categorically cannot have a type of universe where the full answer to existence can be expressed in an inner component of that reality. For example, we can’t have a Wikipedia page with a Riemann sphere that explains the entirety of reality. Reality, or god, cannot press upon the page – because that would necessarily invalidate the rest of the completeness of the rest of the universe! Neither can there ever be a flat mathematical equation that defines every single thing in every finest detail of contingent circumstance for every monad – that’s categorically impossible. The truth is conceptual, and it’s only conceptual, and conceptually the thought itself (the wrapping itself; the probe in particular itself in parallel thinking) must point around all of how, not choice individually spread across monads works;- but how choice in concept works, gathering together a whole conception of the subjective view of the universe from the present point included. It’s conceptual simply because reality (as with spacetime) is conceptual and strictly conceptual first of all. We can’t have truth, or god, bring to bear itself in finiteness of small expression – because, categorically, how would this be? How would it apply to every soul in the same dimension and quality as settling “everything” and yet also “nothing” in particular too far removed from circumstance? There must be no “trace” of the soul anywhere and yet also as many traces of the soul we want to see (bodies; peoples’ clothes left lying around when you go to their home; the glimpses and inspirations of human spirit in story worlds) because this is exactly what’s entirely conceptual in the distinct manner that so-and-such characterizes it. That’s the definition of parallellized particular moving shifting contingent definition. And you can’t get away from it. This is what Kurt Gödel glimpsed in a grand parallel intuition. We already have the other analogy of how sinusoids all exist necessarily and we have to have our “toes” stepped into them all necessarily compositionally at the same time to be able to think (anything);- the mind here (as in The Floating Point and Wave-Particle Duality) can never be seen to be present in any one particular “definition of contingent specific protracted experience”, because the mind must be free definitionally and wholly and eternally and absolutely to shift between them. It’s this freedom which exactly affords how we are both 1) free to think principally whatever we want of the contingency of contingent form, and 2) bound to never be able to bring up anything that would categorically stop us thinking or stop us finding things interesting or reduce reality and existence to zero eternal curiosity. The answer in full to existence must necessarily, categorically and eternally be The Omega Point and very specifically of all infinitude how to reach there with everyone. That must “bring in all the variables”, and such is the flight to deep space and beyond. Ad Astra – To The Stars.
2770
2771
2772Finiteness versus infinity = conceptual gain and range. (Conceptual piecemeal gain and range, when such concepts are properly appreciated as mass parallel symmetry/ies in your monad).
2773
2774
2775Look at this earlier piece from earlier on:
2776
2777“Basis reality can only contain conceptual thoughts, because there is nothing definitive in terms of percepts that could contain and encapsulate concepts. Concepts are in fact the perfect supply in this context. Concepts emphatically must exist, and they must be the pristine, perfectly clear and reproducible units for mental existence. If they weren't, we couldn't freely choose our thoughts and behaviours and actions at all times, drawing from what we know and can intuitively pinpoint and leverage - and neither could the material realm be made of anything that wasn't impervious to spacetime and change, such as a world with universals like electrons has to be. Electrons have to be made of math, there's no two ways about it. Dimensionality must be made of eternal mathematical concepts(!), numbers, and sinusoids.”
2778
2779
2780..
2781
2782
2783
2784
2785And now look at this section from the very beginning of the book:
2786
2787“The whole point of consciousness is that we move away from thinking whatsoever in terms of the senses and spatiotemporal details. We take spatiotemporal cues but we do not suspend ourselves in the thinking of how peoples’ heads and bodies move in multitude and the like. This is the new model for future consciousness. You don’t think about Phenomena Only to reach conceptual clarity, but on the other hand you have to individuate the exact precise general form of how, descriptively, by definition, your mind weaves and bobs in and out of the layers of percepts (sinusoids!) automatically (unconsciously) in order to pick up (select; hook in) the right things routinely. This is superoptimizing the unconscious, and we do it just as it’s achieved in computer programming: we traverse the different levels of conception and piecemeal conceptual “contents” in branches, being free to conceptually intuitively “see” what each individual functional component does (via a dialectic and the general Selector Function being imposed) and we commit changes in accordance with what we’ve grasped should be the answer. All of this happens unconsciously and without having any sort of conceptual visual mind space to do it in. The ability to do this comes built into existence, just as other types of thought in any domain of life would be insufficiently privileged: the only actual distinguishing factor for any concept or conceptualization, is how to analytically get there. That’s what “defines” a contingent concept or a contingent mental expression. Expressions themselves do not and cannot have identities, unique identifiers or identification, or anything of the sort. Mathematics is strictly “anonymous”. You don’t need to keep tabs on thought piecemeal expressions in the way that you don’t need to buy oxygen because you have a means to get it out of an otherwise generally available mechanism. More accurately, however, we would say that thoughts don’t have any necessary existence but the appropriate environmental contexts they are selected in – as soon as you encounter a scenario pressing you for your solutions, you will be able to reformulate them and not otherwise. You cannot make yourself do something before it would be required. That is because conception (interaction between monads) operates at incredibly macroscopic, large, broad mathematical extents of conceptual extension between unknown, unprovidable middlemen processes (like bodies), and only angels have full fit knowledge of what these processes are and how they operate in detail.”
2788
2789
2790What is “unknowable” is cleanly and perfectly categorically unknowable to the present thought and the present selection-context (because we are not fully absolutely fully conscious and [perfectly] able god).
2791
2792
2793
2794
2795
2796
2797
2798Writing (content/percepts as well as objectivity) is dialectical. You have to get into the habit of writing/speaking while heavily using intuition. You spontaneously come up with thoughts in this way, and then you can surprise yourself. All creative acts (creation) definitionally must raise the symmetry to the maximum; they must aim to respect the maximization principle. That's what feels so good. Strikingly, this also means that humans can take breaks from the compositional acts, i.e. instead of our existence being ranged over the broad band of time via successive wavefunction collapses. (A universe of one mind or god would suffer this ill-formed fate). In other words, our progresses in thoughts are principally independent of the wavefunction collapse, so you can coordinate a completely balanced life where you take breaks whenever you want and can pick up exactly where you left off i.e. with yourself (while everyone else does something uniquely different of the categorically same type/form). A universe of percepts couldn’t afford this! Wow! Big tell. This is a big fish.
2799
2800
2801Sex also reflects the maximization principle, which is the draw behind creativity and spontaneity in sex. What is seduction?
2802
2803The maximization principle is what really makes you feel alive. That's what's so alluring about highly intuitive souls.
2804
2805
2806
2807We straddle two essentially different domains and this is proven by how thinking about the selections of where to walk, is essentially different to the choice of which new meal you'd select at a restaurant. In the first sense you are thinking (unconsciously) about particularities needed to be inserted into the objective wavefunction to get to your destination or to get to a different room; this however is beset at all times by the second sense, in which you face a purer conceptual choice which can never quite be split down the middle because you have no information yet about it and no dialectically-built conceptual reformulations. This is the proof, by the way, that mind had to originate in making decisions for which it had no possible knowledge and therefore could not be perceptual or informed by percepts (i.e. the universe had to start by the same form that we are now, naturally, engaged naturally all the time everywhere that we don't know what we're dealing with: conception based on no prior linear determination of causation). Things which are not in any way differentiable (such as an objective "flat universe" visual range under a universe of no background dependency) (such as a wholly entirely new circumstance not perceptually informationally bindable to a certainty) must be deterministically reached by a subjective, biased, deliberate, intentional process. That process must be mind, and it must be essentially "selfish". "Selfish" individuals and selfishness itself will perish. Who knew -- even selfishness will be stripped away by supersymmetry and the dialectic! That should be vividly crystal-clear for you now. This is why the angels, and the Goddess archetype, and Lucifer, always presented with that "and yet.. hold out" sentimentality for us. This is the meaning of divinity, in other words (or a small conceptual sample of it).
2808
2809
2810
2811Writing involves flattening or unrolling of conceptual "contents". But we have to flatten it in the right way, in the right order and by the right "happening-to-be-objectively-and-subjectively-most-utilizable" way. That's what mind is trying to do. Wavefunction collapse is mirrored in all the choices we make; all the hesitation; all the sudden decisions (which are an attempt at collapsing concept into actualization a certain way). This is the bread and butter of existence. Shouting and the worst things we say to one another are an attempt at getting some sort of reaction, and that's exactly why consciousness, self-awareness (meaning social and relationship and emotional self-awareness) and reasoning are the only cure for problems.
2812
2813
2814The mind can copy, and we learn mannerisms and even things like a laugh a certain way, or a smile, from the people we know and are intimate with. This is nothing other than conceptual mind (conceptualization) producing percepts seemingly out of nowhere to an empiricist. What the empiricist doesn't see is that sinusoids are pristine and eternal, reproducible in full consistency and constitution and weight as soon as the mind has cause or circumstance or conceptual grasp to reformulate those contents in such a way. Mind "has its own desire" exactly because mind is off trying to do something else (reality has background dependency: will, desire, life goals, relationship ideals, spiritual ideals, world psychodrama, sacred causes, passions and creativity, inner unconscious drives, and so on).
2815
2816
2817
2818Contingent background dependency: will, desire, life goals, relationship ideals, spiritual ideals, world psychodrama, sacred causes, passions and creativity, inner unconscious drives, and so on
2819
2820Objective, ontological form background dependency, and universal background dependency are explained conceptually by ontological mathematics.
2821
2822
2823
2824Being "bored" is simply the lack of actualization of the maximization function. In future centuries, we will figure out how to resolve all the scenarios which bore us (repetitive formulaic entertainment for example).
2825
2826
2827
2828In movies like Stephen King's The Mist, percepts are given to have a life of their own as they seemingly wait to capture and trap people. This is a profoundly anti-conceptual view of the human condition. We don't have language, consciousness and so on only to lose it all. Anti-conception is the same as improperly forming your thoughts. Death Note is antithetical to empiricism in that it tries to conceptually model psychology and the actions of governments (nations). Whenever you're hitting at high conception, you know you're viewing something from a high quality mind. There are poor grading conceptualizations about broad band conception (stories like Gantz), and there are high grading conceptualizations about low band conceptualization (most stories with say 2 or 3 noticable characters, or any story wholly to do with the private interests component of life). Conception allows us to narrow down things beyond any perceptory glance or assessment. That's because perception is conception.
2829
2830
2831
2832The ontological absolute subjective framing of thought -- the frame of reference -- is the glue that allows us to say these things. If you change your mental conception you can hold two opposing conceptions in mind: 1) that perception is using the senses; 2) that perception is conceiving; the mind using the wrap-around conception and thus the strategy or method by which a perception actually takes place ("behaviour"). Stepping up and down within conceptions is actually what computer programming is all about! That's how debugging and bug finding works (it's a highly conceptual, analytical discipline for thinking intuitives). All engineers of all engineering domains are good at conceptualizing in technical sensing terms. What's G-wan? It's a computer server by a thinking intuitive, which thusly has broad band conceptual maximization using absolute sinusoids. A sensory thinking type could never conceive of such a thing because their imaginative range gain is limited. They aren't old souls.
2833
2834
2835
2836[g wan thing may be wrong conclusion about the guy]
2837
2838
2839[repl] Gantz -> the manga version of Gantz
2840
2841
2842
2843
2844
2845What happens with music from stories we hold close to heart? Our connotations and feelings and archetypal contents get encoded with the music as it's committed to memory. They are conceptually baked in. What do you think mind could do here? Barring angel consciousness, it would have to "accidentally", "automatically" do this by default. This is another way to say that the mind proceeds by its basis general conceptualization as it treats new things. Wavefunction collapse is the ontological form for how the mind is forced to select something - and then over the eons, the soul has developed its own "character" of selection. That's what's "there" in the soul; in and across all the sea of reality. That's what the contingent aspect of eternity "is".
2846
2847
2848
2849
2850
2851The wisdom of Koichi Kawato:
2852
2853
2854“I’m a newly assigned teacher, burning with hope.”
2855
2856“The sparrows never know the ambitions of the swans!”
2857
2858“Do not mock people for having dreams!!”
2859
2860“A person who never forgets the most important thing of all… the importance of having a dream, and reaching for that dream. That’s what an educator should be.” - Koichi Kawato
2861
2862“The size of your ambition is the measure of how big of a man you are.”
2863
2864“This world is filled with hope.”
2865
2866“Teachers aren’t as inept as you think. They’ll help you in all sorts of ways if you just ask them to.”
2867
2868“Things like [ties] make teachers and students keep their distance.”
2869
2870“Let’s work together, and aspire towards our dreams.”
2871
2872“I love those kinds of eyes. And I want to teach students with eyes like that! That’s what my dream is.”
2873
2874“Flutter into your dreams, glitter into tomorrow.”
2875
2876
2877Koichi Kawato is a highly individuated ENTJ. If you had met someone like this in real life you would draw parallells in the similarities. Of course real life isn’t the same as in stories, but the point of stories is to illustrate principal parallels (holisms).
2878
2879
2880The point in the story (Rookies) where he comes up with the phrase about sparrows and swans, is actually a key “hotheaded” point of built-up social tension and stress. It’s holism! It’s the creative poet under due stress. Holists are hotheads (Alma Deutscher will be a hothead when she grows up) because they are bicamerally dominant and bi-present across spacetime and soulblaze. They have cracked open their own heads! It’s the “code” geass (the geass in Code Geass is the commanding ability which makes people do your bidding). How about that for a mythos-logos interlinking? Code Geass of course explicitly mentions the Collective Unconscious in the actual character dialogue. There is a domain of pure thought involved as a major part of the plot.
2881
2882
2883
2884
2885
2886
2887
2888
2889We only understand while we are holding the right conception. This is the answer to the mystery of how our thoughts hold us in different states of mind, and it's exactly what science utterly fails to understand (conceptualize). Percepts cannot make us conceptualize in an adaptive way such as conceptual existence must permit. Percepts are coarse, strongly-defined, and in a universe of no background dependency they would have to be "absolute", leaving no room for conceptual adaptation. Scientists have thoroughly got this the wrong way round. They're barking up the wrong tree.
2890
2891
2892
2893We talk of freedom from percepts but there is freedom from concepts. When the mind has expressive freedom of a high degree (i.e. across some symmetry of a full range of sinusoids in absolute reference space), it can freely play around with creative expressive thoughts intermixing the objective and subjective. Carl Jung wrote about the Active Imagination, but there is also an Active Imagination of intermixing logos and mythos; objective and subjective; concept and percept. In microscale of conception and microscale of spacetime, we are free to conclude our own thoughts in the public space so long as there is no clash with others' worldviews and mind-spaces (conversations and public duties). In macroscale of conception and macroscale of spacetime, people always meet with us and clash with us to prevent our will from realizing. Now this is a point of skill and concern and the ascent to divinity like all other individuating of thought and the wavefunction;- we are allowed to resist the public conception (note that this is bordering on insanity, so it has delicate form) and formulate our own incredibly insightful thoughts such as - "I'm helping you over there - and you - I did this for you"; "thinking of talking to spacetime atoms' souls". Private thoughts are usually kept completely private. Divine souls don't have to keep their thoughts private. Imagine if you could meet someone for whom you could mutually offer recommendations of thoughts, books, movies and you'd be able to help one another individuate like that. In future centuries, would we be able to date humans resembling angels? Quite possibly so. We would be able to access the "language" spanning multiple high conceptual frames of reference, just as angels can literally come down to Earth and talk in human language and human simple sentences.
2894
2895
2896
2897Conception allows you to narrow down on things or to range in on things. Why can scientists not do this and we can? Part of it in the perceptory sense you might say, is that the percepts have been dialectically outpoured already for you to work upon earlier up there in the book, for the pristine hard logos elements of what’s being propsed here. Yet, for scientists those percepts (sentences) aren't the same! In our minds they are "colourful", and present some radically different synesthesia properties to the sentences of mythos and INTP descriptive flaunt. Perception must be conception, because objectively all we have here are black and white shapes on a page. There must be a soul present to make sense of things. That's why we absolutely must have the wavefunction collapse, and why it must be baked into the ontological form of reality. Existence without the wavefunction collapse, with communication and "discussion" at the most irreducible aspect of reality, wouldn't provide any such contingent things. If the universe has gone on for a certain amount of spacetime and produced contingent results, there's no sufficient reason to stop everything. Sufficient contingent reasons (The Omega Point as grand example) can only come subjectively where there is an event horizon i.e. subject-object supersymmetry.
2898
2899What's happening when we commit the wavefunction collapse? Our mind has unconsciously reached its own event horizon of choice. Fast thinking must involve mathematically conceptually finding thoughts fast, such that you're sure of a generalistic outcome (maximization in view of outcomes). Indeed, that's what angels "are". It's their defining special pleading character. It's the only type of angel that would make any sense conceptually in a type of universe with background dependency.
2900
2901
2902
2903An eternal universe doesn't inherently have spacetime; spacetime is visited upon us. Spacetime is a mathematical transformational vehicle by which we produce other zero-dimensional mathematics. The arche is zero-dimensional mathematics, with monads sitting in eternity playing together with no other environment whatsoever. You can't see it (only imagine it in your mind's eye conceptually) exactly and precisely because your thoughts are a part of its expression! They are the particulars which can never amount to representing the grandest, purestmost conception (minds, and the PSR). The clearer your thinking is, the less particular your conception of a monad would be (since you are more accurate). Mystical intuitives of course cannot see the soul, or conceive of it. For them, the soul must take on a kind of mythos-like construct, perhaps as we intuit the souls of main characters to be when we watch movies.
2904
2905Minds, the monad, the PSR, are all reflective properties of thought itself. Rational principles are simply commonalities of thought (parallel thought but not “sensory” thought or “experience”). Why must this be so? It’s because of Equation. Equation necessarily means and mandates that the PSR is not somehow absurdly sitting outside of basis reality and setting everyone on tasks bicamerally and determining from a single “flat universe” basis thread exactly and entirely what we do. Scientists are misguided precisely because they lack high intuition (parallellism and high symmetry to their thought). The PSR emphatically and categorically must be an expression reached and resounded by contingent thoughts proffered/proposed by monads. The PSR emphatically and categorically cannot be out of the reach of monads (i.e. we could not possibly reach the PSR as a conception via a single strict static crisp single one possible contingent thought). Monads are differentiable in their parallellism/holism of their thinking, and rather than gods setting us to one “scientific” “state”, reality is actually multidimensional (it runs around the rings and the scopes and the slopes of a gigantially dimensional sinusoidal web[bing]) and has no inherent “stack” type basis. What comes with “stack” and Set Theory is the finite-only; the non-background-dependent theorization of ultimate reality (false); “flat” reality; reality with only spatiotemporal constitution; randomness and indeterminism (in fact, randomness always has to come from something and so it’s definitionally conceptual!).
2906
2907Random number generation is a fascinating exposure of how science is utterly false. Computers generate random numbers via such constructs as the high precision of the local computer system time. It’s not randomness if it’s an analytical selection! That’s strictly and necessarily a function in computer programming, which is nothing other than a concept! We can call it an expression as well. Or we could call it a thought. These are indeed all commensurate. They are commensurate as long as you have the proper conception of ultimate basis reality, as principally defined in The God Series and as supported by The Truth Series.
2908
2909Angels aren't shocked at what reality is. They simply get on with it to get to the next thought. This is simply because better thought is power. An angel would say - why wait?! What we've got now is even more clarity, therefore it's all the more reason/justified to press ahead.
2910
2911Think of how it used to worry you that not enough expression could fit into "word language". But most of it is happening up here anyway. The smarter the mind gets, the more it can powerfully use words, and there is an inverse relationship: as mind-space expands, the matter-space ("personal space") it needs is less. Conceptual selection guarantees this.
2912
2913
2914
2915Expression space is yet another analog (conceptual pivot) by which we can mathematically think about, ultimately, sinusoids.
2916
2917
2918
2919Sometimes you can have feelings for someone, or they you, and the correct response is not to act. This is the meaning of maturity. Spiritual maturity is immensely delicate form.
2920
2921Concepts do not (necessarily or definitionally) have [rerceptual bounding or fulfilment. consoer the supreego in a last mamn versus yourself. the c cept dialecticaslly survvvedm eveb thohgh tyhe concept was differently expressed in inetensity, clout and phenomena (events circumstances).
2922
2923Souls are capable in specialist microscale terms, but then when they reincarnate they are beset with the conceptualization-demands of the new start-in-life circumstances; the new psyche (as Apollo is in Sousei no Aquarion). Macroscopic competency is the only thing that resists perceptual penetration completely (and this is a concept).
2924
2925
2926
2927    An eternal universe doesn't inherently have spacetime; spacetime is visited upon us.
2928
2929    [add afterwards]
2930
2931"In object-oriented programming and software engineering, the visitor design pattern is a way of separating an algorithm from an object structure on which it operates. A practical result of this separation is the ability to add new operations to existent object structures without modifying the structures. It is one way to follow the open/closed principle.
2932
2933"In essence, the visitor allows adding new virtual functions to a family of classes, without modifying the classes. Instead, a visitor class is created that implements all of the appropriate specializations of the virtual function. The visitor takes the instance reference as input, and implements the goal through double dispatch. "
2934
2935    Wikipedia
2936
2937This is no different conceptually to what we work out intuitively unconsciously to do. Think of all the times you solved logical problems and puzzles in interesting ways. Think of the strange intuitions which suddenly grasped you as you glimpsed conceptually new ways of thinking. Think of how it "felt" like "a different ordering" or "a different way around by which to think". When we first encounter puzzles and the solution "clicks", this is showing a different type of unconscious thought. Now realize that when extroverted gamer streamers are approaching puzzles when they play video games on stream, they are intermixing this with extroverted thinking math.
2938
2939The fact that computer programming reflects conceptual inflexion of various styles and arrangements (conceptions) is key. You cannot get a concept from percepts alone. Imagine an empirical scientist trying to study what the concepts of a piece of code "were" "in full". You've missed the whole point, bozo- the conception is to select! We select parts of the computer code to read, in individual slices of dialectical mental model-building, so that we can build and maintain things by a limited, spacetime output (key presses on individual keys in accordance with time and everyone else's insertions) and then we move on and do it somewhere else! Where is a computer program located? What's its function? Science wants to know, but the whole point of conceptual function is that that itself is a function. You do things with it. This is like a child asking what's the point of a car and where does it go, with the child meaning "where does it fit". The car is a function, so you drive it around anywhere you like conceptually and that's the entire point of a car. The car doesn't belong in any space that's not inherently a concept owing to conception! The same is true of sinusoids, the PSR, mind and conceptual "contents" within conception i.e. thoughts and details of thought. Empiricism is wholly antithetical to conceptualization of the higher order, the meta-thought which is thinking about thinking, hence it can never reach here. It can never reach Hyperborea (beyond land, sea and air). The whole point about concepts (many concepts are functions) is that you don't have to bring them to your home to make your home into them. If concepts had physical location in a material-only universe of no background dependency, then there wouldn't be any point to begin with in having concepts, as you couldn't anymore make your home in the style of a concept with everyone else. If, on the other hand, we live in a conceptual existence where concepts exist in their own contingent right made out of absolute sinusoids of infinite range, then we can express things as long as these are always contingent things, and we can entirely supersede modern spacetime existence which is simply a pattern and a mathematical information band.
2940
2941All the curiosities of what we can do with purely conceptual mind awaits us. We would be unlimited in the key press sense aforementioned just there, so we can start to type nearer divinity into the computer all at once, as fast as individual dialectical thoughts are possible - and we will be able to interact with people in ways that were never possible by the spatiotemporal constraints of matter; but fundamentally we will be happy and content with entirely rational interactions. Imagination and curiosity for an angel works radically different for a human. Never forget - we are only seeing the spacetime outputs of angels, or using thinking intuition to access what the angels must analytically live like in the limited ways we can conceptualize.
2942
2943All the sinusoidal dimensions are real and alive. You are sitting in them all right now, all at once.
2944
2945
2946
2947One of the "problems" from your point of view, for angels, is that angels would rock your world if they manipulated matter in front of you. Since acts of this type could potentially destroy your ego, it's not rationally allowed. Even archons are sufficiently rationally equipped for this - make no mistake of that. Archons cannot be foundationally much different from phosters given the responsibility of their roles.
2948
2949
2950
2951Either archons are fully under the thumb of Satan-the-monad under constant fear of reprisal, or they act independently and thus have the hyper rationality and hyper consciousness much like a phoster.
2952
2953
2954
2955
2956The computer code on the screen is what minds have left in their "scratch buffer"; their mental blackboard that happened to be shared with all the other souls; an extension of the thinking space for the mind. The actual purpose and ontological form of life is to select thoughts using all the spacetime content and the frequencies/sinusoids which can't enter spacetime - selection itself is not going to appear to a scientist on the page; precisely because the scientists themselves are the things which do the selection! You couldn't make it up. Scientists are looking for ghosts, skeptical of ghosts, when they are the ghosts themselves. The ghost is in the machine because the ghost is the concept and the machine is contingent perceptual arrays of conceptual ingredients; conceptual atoms; needed to compose a body (conceptual extension within zero-dimensional math; hard math equations) in order to do something with a body which reflects dimensional manipulation of matter (thus awarding us high conceptual mental capabilities). Just as buildup happens in orchestral music pieces and stories, matter and the inventions we generate surrounding matter literally lift us up in conception to divinity, dialectically. That is the goal and the purpose and use and gain of spacetime and the spatiotemporal domain.
2957
2958
2959
2960
2961Learning a new dance move equips you so you have more to select from next time. But this is not a true complete conception of the mind when we think of what we've added for ourselves or someone else. It's not "clean" and clear cut as that. Our minds are dialectically informed and absolutely grounded.
2962
2963
2964
2965
2966"Model–view–controller is an architectural pattern commonly used for developing user interfaces that divides an application into three interconnected parts. This is done to separate internal representations of information from the ways information is presented to and accepted from the user. The MVC design pattern decouples these major components allowing for efficient code reuse and parallel development. "
2967
2968    Wikipedia
2969
2970The controller is what’s logically achieved (overarching program structure); the view is how the information is arranged (like how a help or contact webpage has database fields to access; but we only select certain elements for each page); and the model relates to transparency and transformation of domain-specific information and functionality, the code thereby uncontaminated from the other domains of program code. It theoretically thus avoids the mental friction of dipping your mind in multiple conceptual detail domains at once.
2971
2972"The Controller is responsible for controlling the application logic and acts as the coordinator between the View and the Model. The Controller receives an input from the users via the View, then processes the user's data with the help of Model and passes the results back to the View."
2973
2974    TutorialsPoint
2975
2976Initially languages like C did everything without the abstraction of classes (objects to act on, which could be "manufactured" and instantiated in multiple). You had global functions which could operate on anything, and it was a complete Wild West of different names, datas and function signatures (the forms that the functions take their parameters in), which constellated no particular meaning across them. At a very stretching analogy, we could say that the C language operated in an absolute programming reference-space, while C# and C++ operated in a subject-object programming reference-space (classes, and thus the "objects" instantiated as individual instances of objects, then were acted upon, and thus subjected to certain forces or functions).
2977
2978Domain knowledge is different to generalized knowledge. Conception (unit monads) provisions for all possible scopes, vectors, tangents and domains of knowledge. It achieves this because conception conceptualizes. That's what it does. As soon as we start talking about particulars, the past tense, locations and spatiotemporality, we have "missed the point" so it's only that we can talk about 1) eternal, universal, necessary absolute a priori ontological structure or 2) contingent things. You are an eternal mind that has conceptual existence not extended contingent expressed existence, and that's precisely why as soon as you've pumped out a thought you've jumped the gun and can't pinpoint anything about yourself. You are the ghost, dummy! You are alive. That's the whole point. If a mind could appear on a page then what about all the other ways a mind could appear and get utilized? This is simply undefinable.
2979
2980
2981
2982By the second part of your life (act 2), be prepared to draw upon all the knowedge you've gained.
2983
2984
2985
2986
2987
2988
2989“In our lives, our conscious mind pretends it’s in full control at all times (this illusion is crucial to our sanity), but much of the time it’s our unconscious mind that’s actually running the show and taking the decisions.”
2990
2991- Mike Hockney
2992
2993The conscious mind operates on what it can construct knowledge and awareness of (the particulars and holisms delivered to it). We can consciously become aware that right now we don’t know 99% of what’s happening in the world (In the film Amelie, the woman of the same name asks how many people in the world are having sex right now); we don’t keep tabs on all the constructs of how we could be reading certain books and quotes and bits of recent Internet resources right now; we don’t know what’s around the corner in terms of social and interpersonal expectations. If the mind has a limited mathematical expression capability due to lack of individuated mathematical essential holistic “draft” over the sinusoidal web, then it simply must compact itself into protracted, drawn solutions to cover up and to account for the fact of limiting influence. In ego and persona this is reflected in superpatterns like shyness, mental health breakdowns, making mistakes then backpedalling, sticking to your guns when you’re a delusional mystical sociopath, being unable to account for things and simply shutting down the responsive part and withdrawing into familiar patterns (family issues from bad parenting). Everyone has to deal with their Shadow which is to say;- everyone has dark corners they need to navigate around. We don’t do this in a linear sense but a parallelized, infinitudal sense.
2994
2995The conscious mind cannot select enough things, so we go with a formulation and this is a rolling formulation which cannot afford to touch everything at once. Different souls prioritze different goals and aims, across all the spread of life’s curiosities, wishes, factors of valuation, commitments, styles of conceptions, worldviews, thought systems. This in turn forms conceptual enclosures for the inner concepts and their evolutionary fitness or lack thereof for the task being ranged on them. We therefore step in and out of these contexts regularly; or alternately said, the variables are dropped and heaped-on regularly; and this is a type of pattern particularly informed and modelled/modified and evolved as the rest of the unit monad’s contents (sinusoids) try to conceptually wrap around things.
2996
2997One powerful thought is this: think of a sinusoidal web in many different dimensions; let’s say 10 or 20 dimensions – and the silvery sinusoidal web tries to enclose itself upon something; some particular point in 3d spacetime space or some concept with conceptual shape. Now, where this is trying to wrap around something like a blanket, its tentacular “feeler” nature will eventually stroke something at some point of contact (analytical ray tracing and contact point tangents). The billowy blanket-like web, which we can imagine like a silvery jellyfish, will wrap the rest of itself analytically around in some known, pre-given style and form;- except, it will also now be informed by the percept and any future such interactions also then tangenitally inform where the percept’s outer shape, its outline, might be so analytically more found. We can see this reflected in 3 dimensions with the way that we find our way around in the dark by touching objects. (It’s fascinating how bad we are at it). What happens then is that we are now treated, once we’ve got contact, with several abilities: we can choose to move closer to band the contact over the found shape in full covering; we can choose to do a similar thing shifted a bit to the side (in any dimension and even across dimensions, as in diagonal mirroring and polar coordinates work in 2d) or we can find more percepts and conceptualizations by the existing (given) continous patterns and shapes (multidimensional of course) given by interpenetrations within the blanket/web and also with the shape. When you’re feeling someone up in bed, you have more than 3-dimensionality to choose from, because you have all the social, sexual and psychological coordinates to choose from! These are all different domains and dimensions; sinusoids;- but the property given by parallel sinusoidal contents is that these themselves inherently generate new “effective” domains; “artificial” domains; “contingent” domains. Domains are simply locuses of interest, ultimately. The domain and the locus and the frame of reference and the percept all come with the conception. There are “inner conceptions” which are very useful for rooting out badly-formed selections and processes (this is the noumenal, sinusoidal immune system! Noumenal white blood cells). Since every soul has its own noumenal white blood cell concepts, we thus generate completely different unique behaviours.
2998
2999You never get exact mirroring in a highly universal sense (across the Riemann sphere). You get the resultant, contingent highly defaced/deformed shape of sinusoidal webs, and these are reflecting other properties of the same self (the unit monad) for it to change via parallel analysis (meta-analysis) of exactly analytically how it interpenetrates itself.
3000
3001Mathematics isn’t to be thought of only in absolute frames. Across the Riemann sphere is actual definition, not just the numbers in themselves. We are strictly beings/monads of contingent qualities which are themselves (in wide array continuously morphing and shifting slightly) trying to locate common parallel (i.e. zero-dimensional holism, not “one-dimensional” calculus) patterns. The thing is that patterns themselves are based on expressions of functions (time, other variables are cropped in) and so you are dealing with the indirectional problems of conditionality of variables crossing with conditionality of variables (even in the interpenetrational contact points as a whole pattern in parallel; think of all the points on a curve but for an infinite-dimensional jellyfish “skirt”). The points in this analogy can be ranged over any part of the jellyfish skirt (edges, seams, the whole entire surface, or just a few spots) because this is to engage in the entirely conceptual, which has absolute conceptual freedom of ranging of thought in the most essential sense (but not in the sense that you can have all possible states of such contingent thought somehow present at once). Selection and conception are strictly analytical, mathematical formulations which always contain definitive mathematical contents along all sinusoids/dimensions/heights/depths at each point of actual wavefunction collapse.
3002
3003What if you could pour molten chocolate over a Riemann sphere balloon? (But analytically, mathematically, and in a waving pattern)?
3004
3005
3006“In leibniz’s system, there are two domains. there is a static domain of monads “in themselves” – as noumena outside space and time. then there is a domain full of movement, of energy that flows from monads. this movement takes place in the perfect cartesian arena established by the monads. it is this movement in this specially defined arena that is responsible for what we perceive as space and time. in other words, the mathematical properties of the cartesian arena lead to the creation of space and time when energy (movement) flows through that arena. the part of the cartesian arena defined by real numbers supports movement through “space”; the part of the cartesian arena defined by imaginary numbers supports movement through “time” (i.e. motion through imaginary space is perceived as the flow of time).”
3007
3008- Mike Hockney
3009
3010Time is a locus that maps spatial and intuitive loci by secondary properties of the percepts and noumena they apply to. When people involve themselves in some spacetime act (such as playing sports), we can conceptualize about that in smaller part within a much wider superstructure conception. Indeed, we are always conceptualizing by time (it is necessarily in the equation, but the conditionality, the treatment, varies with souls). Autistics may simply not understand time in itself, or space in itself, i.e. they could understand these domains as separated-off from how they individuated everything else.
3011
3012Time allows you a coordant (or accordant) index [in the abstract, holistic, generalized sense of index] for the relationship to be expected from motion, shape and logical “destiny”. If we didn’t have an innate built-in access to time as well as space, then nothing analytically expressed in spacetime would fluctuate or function perfectly in the sense of well-defined form (properly formed; good form; well-formed). The reference space for time allows us to garner exactly how much fine-precision spatial relationship activity (matter, weight distribution, fulcrum of swinging, multidimensional properties of shape and texture and buoyancy) is happening in accordance with our internalized models. This must be consistent with time, after all, because time is a flipside of how mass, volume and shape can be defined at all as if to have an inter-relational deconstructible-and-reconstructible basis. If you had matter without time for example; then no properties like apples rotting would ever be necessarily existing; hence reality wouldn’t have periods or phases, and everything would be subject to some circumstantial absolute basis of definition (pure cosmic whiteboard of spatial 3d expression frozen in time) which had no lateral/counterpart basis in reduction and rebirth of matter properties. Time comes in built with matter, because to define matter is to definitionally comprise and use it in a context where other minds are vying to change it with different time-ranged conceptions of ordering, need, symmetry, holism and so on. Matter in the strictest spatial composition sense of course doesn’t exist, because although it theoretically does, our uses of matter are always tied to other more abstract goals (and never moreso than in the case of gods and angels).
3013
3014To have a universe of time is to have a universe where souls can compete and arrange and organize set ahead, behind and above one another. This offers infinitely more inherent expression than does a spatial matter universe with no time. Time, in fact, is an analytical property that must go forward as the wavefunction collapse does. If you didn’t have a common locus, domain or reference-point for what happened across wavefunction collapse(s), then it wouldn’t actually be meaningfully possible to do anything because you could just skip doing anything and stay still in the universe and contribute absolute nothing and sit it out like a popped basketball game. If the spatial universe was just a solid 3d canvas for souls to paint on, nothing meaningfully human of expressive would come out, because bodies would not have circumstances or dances or events such as you get with cars, wars and sprawling rows / curling spirals of houses. If we add time to the mix however, then we get bodily “inevitability” by inbuilt bodily degradation, inbuilt cars and planes and sex, and inbuilt planetary meaning and coordination via space and time. Time facilitates coordination by other abstract means (indirection) than in pure space, but this is then further enriched by the infinite conceptual variations we can produce (via sinusoids).
3015
3016Constantly we can connect to other souls. This is important to note for the dialectics, dreams, intuitions and the Collective Unconscious.
3017
3018Time isn’t “inbuilt” as if imposed over all sinusoids by default, but is a number range, and time is coordinated by a particular absolute range of supersymmetry.
3019
3020How do we connect to other souls? One locus point is actually spacetime (the looking up at someone who is in a high window) and the others are informational, romantic, psychological (leaders of tour groups identified by indexes like who is watching or following who; remembering where someone was walking around last time you saw them; learning peoples’ names).
3021
3022
3023
3024
3025
3026
3027
3028Realize that this book couldn't have been produced on a Phoster Planet. I wouldn't have been drawn to do it. Now you know the meaning of the divine.
3029
3030Consider that consciousness is never “linear” but highly and abstractly parallellized via sinusoidal symmetry. You may have “your plan” for your book but then your book could grow in length. Therefore, to ascertain and anticipate and intercept the most general kinds of phenomenal/perceptual “conceptually closing matchups”, we have to generalize our knowledge to a tight form degree of Good Form; well-formed form. We principally get to this by a most generalized, generalizable and parallellizable property (so-called “the dialectic” because as a concept it crosses ranges and domains to do with self/other, self/society, and monad/collective, subject/object, spatiotemporal/noumenal, content/form). The dialectic is a transcendent or transcendental concept. It is a massively parallel concept. It is strictly a cross-domain concept, however you can also have an inner dialectic (which is a thinning, narrow-banding version of a usual form of a dialectic). Consciousness surrounds such functions: it is a majorly or usually inwardly formed (hence “narrowed”) form of the/a dialectic;- and this is how indeed consciousness is a narrowing, limiting mathematical function. Consciousness is both the conception and the selection – the selection being encapsulated within the conception – where the selection itself, as our variably understood concept (in all cases) can itself move and range and step-up and step-down and step-across in what it is able to achieve, identify and expose to the rest of consciousness (and also thus to the unconscious, and to others’ dialectics).
3031
3032Consciousness = Escape Velocity.
3033
3034The Last Contingency = It doesn’t matter the order, as long as the content is there. As long as the content is there, it doesn’t matter the order. Conception works on such terms (Equation).
3035
3036Hidden within every last new sentence, paragraph and statement, of course, as we might have surmised, is a minute but parallel nudge towards the right (parallel) direction in existential life (eternity). Nudges are always parallel (sinusoidal) and not serial/linear. Parallel contents (statements informed through rational minds) thus therefore have parallel cross-reflection properties, washing dialectically over the monad each time in different straits. This is the meaning (form) of reading a book. Percepts thus inform the conceptual content of the monad by their parallel results. This is antithetical to science’s empirical view of a percept-only universe generated by a “random” wavefunction collapse. Randomness definitionally cannot come from “nowhere”, and it would have to be parallel anyway, as everything inherently is. Minds operate in parallel sinusoidal activity, as does the monadic collective, as does god, luck, intent, love, and so on (cue all “megaconcepts” here).
3037
3038Why do we think to bring to bear maximum utility? Why do we do it in patently different styles (supersymmetries in the monad across the sinusoidal web)? We must be taking contingent character from this, in exact form. As above, so below (and so too between, by the same token and standard and form). Consciousness is the output of a monad, just as conception has to be. When gods break symmetry in the Big Bang again each time, we are engaged in maximization of power based on low-tier Monadic Contents (parallel explorations of sinusoidal webbing). As we can connect with other monads and use math to do so (it literally must be an eternal non-non-mathematical selection criteria ranged over the whole entire noumenal universe/monads which does exist), this is the “last missing piece” of how spacetime and noumenal dialectics must categorically come to a close (of contingency, and god consciousess;- convergence in the most generalizable possible contingent and absolute sense, which is to say, convergence on the Omega Point).
3039
3040Mythos Sinking and Unconscious Sinking = wide berth = widest possible breadth (as opposed to depth-based search) for synthesis and maximization [(of) yield] of sinusoidal contents. Dig deep to throw deep! Existential shovelling. Existential exhuming of the body of god. Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory (TV) said he wanted to tear off the mask of nature and stare at the face of god. Only intuitive thinking types can see god outwith and independent of and irrespective of the spatiotemporal domain (matter). God is “around” matter. God is everywhere (the Hegelian absolute and the Hegelian idea). Muck up! Get your hands dirty. Suit up in the suit of a god, by tapping into The Obscured God within. (Abraxas).
3041
3042We must always go other places en route to the destination. This is no less true in writing, and mental health, than anywhere else. The Soul Line has spoken. The Goddess has spoken.
3043
3044“Cinema, simulated life, ill drama
3045Fourth Reich culture, Americana
3046Chained to the dream they got ya searchin' for
3047Tha thin line between entertainment and war”
3048
3049 - Rage Against The Machine - No Shelter
3050
3051What do entertainment and war have in common? What or Where is their irreducible cross-boundary, searched-for in all our sinusoidal symmetry? (What is there “everything condition”)? They are bound together in mass conception. Conception is everything. Conception is the container for god. God reshuffles itself and we are exploring Conception, the container for god.
3052
3053All concepts and ideations (like shame over talking about mythos fancies) do not belong (strictly) in the god equation. They must all be dialectically shifted and individuated out/away (exhumed and then subsumed). What remains is the purified, “formless” image of god. This is strictly due and owing to mass parallellism of symmetry in the monad (via infinite sinusoids). Existence would be possible without this scenario. With infinite sinusoids acting as a point around a circle (Euler’s Formula), it comes as a given that we have infinite monads also. It’s the same basis property being reflected (via the Hegelian absolute). There is no means or space between these. Therefore, they must both come with the conception. They must, in such order, come with the PSR. Life must always be dialectically refined away from its impurities (via the vector of dimensionality/sinusoids).
3054
3055
3056
3057
3058Angels and gods and the divine and The Higher Self involve egoic shielding, egoic self-sacrifice, individuation and hyper rationality and hyper consciousness. You need to think you're it, in order to intuit and express great things. You need an environment in which you can imagine yourself appear to be one of the best. The Sacred Cause has some circumstantial and environmental (perceptual) contingencies in terms of variables and conditions that come with the conception. But to say we think we are the best – this actually very neatly comes with the conceptualization of life. The more conscious we are, then resultingly, the less we need to inflate our egos and the more we have rationally individuated to accept the angels’ rationality as primary. Isn’t that astounding? Absolute living mathematics can only reflect absolute living mathematics and it can reflect exactly nothing outside of these parameters. It’s not possible to be both hyper conscious and also incredibly irresponsibly egotistical in view of the angels. The PSR doesn’t permit it, but the PSR didn’t influence anything; reality had some wrap-around mechanics to it. This can only be because of background dependency: all thoughts formed via conscious progress and invididuation actually reflect the other thoughts which have been well-defined (as well as the archetypes) and as we advance in one general direction, all the other symmetries are generally reliably found by the Pioneer unit monads. The angels acutely know here that this “safe gnosis” is built into existence and very extremely rarely does this process ever go wrong (since we are all evolving in concert together). Satan-the-monad, moreover, has gone wrong by design. If you think with dedication here about all the scenarios and corner cases governed by the sheer rational power of the concepts and rules which shape our world, you will come to notice that no individual single human can ever change the world except by picking a side which has predesignated form, and this is intentionally orchestrated to force you into gnosis by a small degree; just enough that it remains an organic choice all the same. What souls cannot attribute to one source and target (anger or the cause for living and evolving) they will find from the multitude of the souls and project it humanistically as if it comes in that form. Math works upon math, and concepts like the community start to rule our mind, pacifying us via rational dialectics. The mind of an angel is “peaceful” and the angel is left wanting for nothing.
3059
3060
3061
3062"I had a biologist tell me once, “If genes aren’t involved, it ain’t evolution.” So that means you can’t talk about the evolution of the Earth as a physical body. You can’t talk about the evolution of human social institutions. Evolution is somehow a word appropriate to biology and appropriate nowhere else. This brings me then to the first factor easily discerned by anybody who has their eyes open that compromises and erodes the hopeless, existential view of the world that we’re getting from science. That is the idea that nature is in fact across all scales and all levels of phenomena, a unity. It’s not a coincidence that electrons spinning around an atomic nucleus and planets going around a star and star clusters orbiting around the gravitational center of a galaxy; it’s no coincidence that these systems exhibit the same kind of order on different scales. Yet, science would say that is a coincidence.
3063
3064"P.W. Bridgeman, who was a philosopher of science, defined a coincidence as what you have left over when you apply a bad theory. It means that you’ve overlooked something and what jumps out at you as a coincidence is actually a set of relationships whose casuistry and whose relationships to each other are simply hidden from you. What I’ve observed and I think it’s fair to give credit to the psychedelic experience for this - what I’ve observed is that nature builds on previously established levels of complexity. This is a great general, natural law that your own senses will confirm for you but has never been allowed into the canon of science. What I mean by that nature builds on complexity is the following. When the universe was born in the dubious and controversial circumstance called the Big Bang, it was at first simply a pure plasma of electrons. It was the simplest that it could possibly be. There were no atoms. There were no molecules. There were no highly organized systems of any kind. There was simply a pure plasma of expanding energy.
3065
3066"As the universe cooled, simply cooled, new kinds of phenomena, we say emerged out of the situation. As the universe cooled, atomic nuclei could form and electrons could settle in to stable orbits. As the universe further cooled, the chemical bond became a possibility. Still later the hydrogen bond…which is a weaker bond, which is the basis of biology. So as the universe aged, it complexified. This is so obvious that it’s never really been challenged. But on the other hand, it’s never been embraced as a general and dependable principle either. Follow it through with me. Out of atomic systems come chemical systems. Out of chemical systems comes the covalent hydrogen bond, the carbon bond; complex chemistry that is prebiotic, organic. Out of that chemistry come the macro-physical systems that we call membranes, jells, charge transfer complexes, this sort of thing. These systems are the chemical preconditions for life - simple life, the life of the prokaryotes, the life of naked unnucleated DNA that characterized primitive life on the planet.
3067
3068"Out of that life come eukaryotes, nucleated cells and then complex colonies of cells. Then cell specialization – leading to higher animals, to social animals, leading to complex social systems, leading to technologies, leading to globe girdling, electronically based, information transfer oriented cultures like ourselves. Someone once said, ‘what’s so progressive about media?’ ‘It’s the spreading of darkness at the speed of light.’ It can be, it can be. So this is very interesting that apparently the way the universe works is upon a platform of previously achieved complexity; chemical, electrical, social, biological, whatever. New forms of complexity can be built that cross these ontological boundaries. In other words, what I mean by that is that biology is based on complex chemistry but it is more than complex chemistry. Social systems are based on the organization that is animal life and yet it is more than animal life.
3069
3070    Terence Mckenna
3071
3072Everything is profound to you until you reach the next level of conception. You have dynamic conceptual (selectional or selectory) freedom to transcend and traverse conceptual selection, orienting you around our world noumenally via absolute-reference-space math. Everything must be reduced further, and it’s from this we achieve generalization at the same time (reduction and generalization are conceptually commensurate when baked into conceptualization). The PSR can’t be generalized or reduced, and the mental work to gnosis is of course finite, because it operates in an absolute space where we contingently build starting from the broadest phenomena and the narrowest conceptual sophistication. 
3073
3074Conceptualization is exactly that which can never be pinned down in phenomenal, non-conceptual terms! Fancy that. It moves and shifts, using percepts and spatiotemporal natures to elicit conceptually different constructs. You can't pin down conceptualization, ever, because it is the very foundation and nature of how to sort, organize and arrange and transform things. That's what conception is, especially and always at the grand scale of conceptualization (the wavefunction being the ultimate "percept" and "content" of conception). The wavefunction is science's religious god because it appears to be the source of all the percepts, i.e. it's the ultimate percept and the ultimate sensory point of informational convergence. That is the draw and the magic of it. In rationalist conception of reality, we understand that the wavefunction is a necessary form of how reality must be conducted (meaning it's intelligible and has universal, absolute, eternal existence).
3075
3076Eternal minds are zero-dimensional and they conceptually range conceptualizations by changing the mathematical parameters, just as we change computer code variables to draw wider or narrower squares and circles on a screen; and just as climate modellers mathematically select parts of the planet’s surface to feed into a computer using math;- the same exact mechanism of conception stretching over areas is at play when angels think about different portions of the planet and people.
3077
3078What media is, and what translation is, and what percepts are, cannot be something that "sticks out" beyond all else. In higher conception, we must find what is irreducible. The ultimate irreducibles of contingency are monads (thinking units; units of conception; sources of conception; agents of conception). The ultimate irreducible of absolute objective necessity is the PSR. The irreducible of contingency is actually the same thing as the irreducible of absolute objective necessity; it's just that as soon as we want to write slightly different sentences, we want to talk about slightly different things. This is just another reflection of subject-object dichotomy and we will never escape it. As soon as we talk about absolute strict straight-and-narrow necessity, we get the PSR - and feeling a little to the left or right, we can end up thinking in that liminal space, that event horizon point, where we think the percept originates and should be (hence we get, the unit monad which leads to agency and causation or an instance of causation). This is because we cannot reflect purely objective thought (and because we are defining thoughts for subject-object thinking in subject-objects i.e. monads).
3079
3080Definitionally when we have found something in the correct absolute-reference-space way (like the unit monad), then no matter what words we used for it, the frequency alignment and natural supersymmetry in the monad's reflection (given by the background dependency of reality) ensures that this holds consistent. That's enough. That's why we can share thoughts (because we all use the same background, sinusoids in their infinite range, to define thoughts). The subject-object dichotomy naturally ensures this (or as we could say, it comes built into existence).
3081
3082
3083
3084So, we can reflect generally objective thought patterns (ontological mathematics), but strictly speaking in terms of each individual detailed thought our monads produce, there can be no thought that is irrespective of how we would feel or think (we can't have no signal or a flat signal). The ontological form produces in our mind's eye visuals like a perfect 2d grey cartesian square upon which there's no mind but the ability to draw in different places whatever it wants; but in reality, of course, definitionally, our minds must have been doing something in order to think about the PSR in particular in the first place -- and how do you think that happens? It comes conceptually with the rest of our (particular) contingent mental contents, drawing from the sinusoids in all their infinite range.
3085
3086We can still think objectively, and we can think about absolute necessary aspects of existence and these will always be binding, eternal and eternally valid. We still have an objective wavefunction (the shared dream; the shared spatiotemporal domain) but in the most strictest technical sense (or not! Since we are disproving this right now) our thoughts will always have some definite particular detail.
3087
3088
3089
3090The mind is cross-domain with respect to objective vs. subjective, mind vs. matter and concept vs. percept. That's the way it is. There is no insurmountable wall anywhere (sleep is a phase change but it's still mathematical), and this is why both sides of the mathematical coin always "survive" and "prevail". Everything is always present in potential but our actualizations pick and weave from what is available in absolute terms, to craft the "third thing", the contingent world of actualization (which also includes conceptual mathematical projections of others, and how we would like them to interact with us, and what we would like their thoughts to be).
3091
3092Gods don't date or have cute trysts where an anima/animus figure teases you and tries to get you to think in different, interesting ways. That's because gods are so incredibly ridiculously fuck-off capable that their only possible company is themselves due to them being severely hampered in efficiency and output if anyone bothered them at all. Put another way, there is a conceptual difference here which thus separates monads at this juncture. Consider that people try to date each other taking cues from spacetime perceptual interaction (to try to guage interest people do some silly mental estimations based on silly indexes). Gods are thoroughly so far beyond all that, and there is no amount of simple lifetimes you could have to catch up. That's the meaning of a conceptual difference versus an additive difference: it's intractible (for now, or which is rather to say; for this configuration of eternity's mental interoperation).
3093
3094The ultimate units of action are monads. When monads themselves are "configured" properly at-scale, in parallel, that's when the entire universe does something completely definitionally special on a level that nothing "within" could ever meet or reach. This is also how we are all religiously and spiritually shielded from future outcomes which get worse. Praise the PSR! (You don't have to!).
3095
3096
3097
3098You can't pester a god not because it would dimish the god's use of time but because you have no operations of contingent output compatible with a god's. We are left with your will to connect with a god on the one hand, and the god's divine wavefunction collapse ability on the other (remember, a god by definition in ontological mathematics is infinitely openminded). The god can't see what it can do to help you so it would "close up shop" or close the case there.
3099
3100You are here to become god, and the only way to achieve maximum expression and freedom and clarity and joy and symmetry for every soul (symmetry being the maximization of joy for angels and gods that want us to join them) means that we need to find godhood ourselves. That's why the angels have set us here. You can't conceptually argue with this because when you step this high in conception, it's clear that there's nothing superior to that conceptually. The same is true when you wouldn't have a body but you would have the PSR (you can't really talk about yourself anymore at that point, because you are now an extreme problem solver and you don't have hangups or personality flaws or scars in your wavefunction).
3101
3102Welcome to divinity! Where everyone's problems get resolved instantly and generally things are set right for everyone all the time. Angels live in divinity; in this divine highly intuitive circle of thoughts constantly. Gods are accessing this type of "inspired" thought all the time, and so are angels. It's just that us, being down below here in the conceptual mire of percepts, consider ourselves and our situation as less than ideal. You couldn't make it up. Perfect conception is all the difference, and the only possible difference (the only special pleading).
3103
3104"Special pleading is a form of fallacious argument that involves an attempt to cite something as an exception to a generally accepted rule, principle, etc. without justifying the exception.
3105
3106"The lack of criticism may be a simple oversight (e.g., the reasons are thought to be obvious) or an application of a double standard. "
3107
3108    Wikipedia
3109
3110One form of special pleading (if we parse the words literally) is asking god to help you. To raise this kind of action, (if we think semantically), there exists a pleading for a special case or a special circumstance or a special kind of derivation; as if we could hit the very pure aspect of will. That, we are saying, is the irreducible quality of the soul and the monad and the PSR. It's conception itself. Conception is the only form of special pleading, in that conception is the only thing that can ask for help. Conception is the root thing which defines, selects, measures, estimates, manufactures, performs, and encapsulates. Conception is the chief thing. The PSR doesn't exist, remember, outside of monads' existence. The PSR comes with monads; it comes with active, eternal conception. That part is important. We literally are the PSR! We are the reason we have come down and broken into myriad fragments of antisymmetry and asymmetry. We are the mind, we are the matter - if only we would all know it. We are here to save ourselves because "we" is entangled in both the operative (form/mind) and operand (content/matter). Note that as soon as you stop thinking in embodied terms though, this (contingently) ceases to hold; ceases to be the case.
3111
3112Operand: A quantity on which a mathematical or logical operation is performed.
3113
3114
3115
3116"Qohen Leth: Nothing adds up.
3117
3118"Joby: No. You've got it backwards, Qohen. Everything adds up to nothing, that's the point.
3119
3120"Qohen Leth: What's the point?
3121
3122"Joby: Exactly. What's the point of anything?"
3123
3124    The Zero Theorem (2013)
3125
3126The dialectic cannot speak for conception itself (the monad). The irreducible quality of the dialectic – conception - is what we are targeting if we try to understand all of existence. But all we ever arrive at in terms of absolutely particular thought-details and percepts, is contingent thoughts. This is because we are inescapably free in the ontological form sense: we can analytically work out the truth quality of existence (ontological mathematical analytical thinking; mathematical philosophy) but as soon as we then try to "rely on" any one particular thing for all the rest of our lives, experiences and thoughts;- nothing like that can ever appear to forever "resolve" all of the future. That's because the future is multilateral, not unilateral. A universe of only one monad, or one creator god, could destroy itself and stop itself thinking - which is absurd and undefinable! Existence cannot be configured in any other way than the most supremely rational way; which is to say, conception cannot be anything other than proper, well-defined conception with background dependency. If conception can do one thing, then it must be able to do everything of contingent sinusoidal form. If we are to think, then we must have things to think on. There is no simple answer endpoint to thought;- it must go on eternally. It’s within consciousness that freedom and divinity can reside. That’s our power. We have to follow the maximization principle.
3127
3128The "point" of anything, where everything converges, doesn't actually exist in full rights. The PSR forces an analytical point to go around the circle (the floating point is described in The God Series #32 by Mike Hockney and in The Truth Series by Dr. Thomas Stark) and that's definitionally, universally all we get -- subjectively, we are free to range our thoughts conceptually (think back to a squiggly drawing on a square) as much as we like; as much as we have the knack and competence and rigour to compose. (As much as we have the cause or the whim to compose.)
3129
3130
3131
3132The Magnificent Seven soundtrack - wow, some real "excitement and adventure and discovery" vibes here. Feels like Pioneer music.
3133
3134
3135
3136Here are two different conceptions (they range differently) - 1) We are the PSR, we are the whole and everything about what is to be done, and what can be considered. (The divine sense); 2) We are monads, acting separate from the PSR but still rationally.
3137
3138As soon as we try to fudge the absolute and contingent into the same convergent truth statement, we enter the problem of different domains clashing and intermixing. This is due to the nature of conception! We can't talk about pure actualization everywhere for everyone (being and acting as the divine community right now), because that has not been objectively currently contingently defined. So we can't (validly or definitionally in full) hit the highest most valuably religious thing to ever say. We also can't talk purely neutrally in conceptual terms, since that isn't inspiring or exciting or subjective. We have to include subjectivity always to properly form a thought (like saying the PSR exists and that monads exist and are defined separately).
3139
3140Conceptual mind hits conceptual, and thus "abstract" targets. That's the source of minds' mistakes, and the dialectical pursuit which can only come via conceptual targeting. Targeting is always conceptual. We could have said previously that conception is about targeting (rather than selecting). These are just different ways of expressing the thing which is undefinable with any particular (conception and conceptualization). Conception refers to 1) the quality and totality of a conception or a thought in particular; 2) the ability and capacity to conceive; 3) the act or quality of provisioning thoughts (which is what unit monads do). Monads are the quintessential and only units of conception; 4) the ability or power to conceive. Conceptualization refers to 1) how we conceive, arrange or configure a thought; 2) the process of conceptualizing, conceiving or protracting or giving rise to a thought; 3) the act and ability to conceive thought; 4) the quality of conceiving a thought; 5) the whole process which makes thought; 6) how to produce a thought.
3141
3142Note that any particulars we offer ("explanation") are always ranged, directed and pointed at what we want to indicate because of our own subject-object bias. It's built into the monad and comes with its style and nature and form of conception. Personality comes with the state of the monad, but is also of course a more abstract concept than that if we want to so conceptualize it (as many people obviously do). Ultimately, we end up with each "megaconcept" word in our minds being relateable and tractable at various styles, ranges and traversals of conception in constellated, related terms as to similar thought functionality. Words reflect not particular frequencies themselves, but thoughts and functions. (Or we would say; the monad has highly sophisticated ways to trace these things via one grand conception). Conception, actually, simply is the way we frame things. You couldn't make it up. One moment you're asleep, the next you're awake. Similarly all thoughts can only be particulars; thus, they are always detached from pure straight-and-through objectivity; pure neutrality. There is no such possible thing as pure neutrality, just as a universe of pure flat Nothing with no background dependency can never exist (it can't produce the Something we have here right now).
3143
3144Time, space, conditionality, are all particular thoughts produced by minds. When minds think collectively, we get all the interesting secondary properties of thought, which are not primary at all for our individual subjective reference-spaces we've built (conceptualized). Literally the way we think, compared to other minds, is what gets us so tangled. When you tangle or clash with another person (dissonance) based on introverted intuition, every which way you want to step in mind gets obstructed. The wills clash and the conceptions seem to be two worlds clashing.
3145
3146"Dissonance has several meanings related to conflict or incongruity:
3147
3148Cognitive dissonance is a state of mental conflict.
3149Cultural dissonance is an uncomfortable sense experienced by people in the midst of change in their cultural environment.
3150Consonance and dissonance in music are properties of an interval or chord (the quality of a discord)
3151Dissonance in poetry is the deliberate avoidance of assonance, i.e. patterns of repeated vowel sounds. Dissonance in poetry is similar to cacophony and the opposite of euphony.
3152Dissonance (album), a 2009 album by Enuff Z'Nuff.
3153Dissonance (film), a 2015 film."
3154
3155 - Wikipedia
3156
3157Dissonance, conceptually, has a general conceptualization (wikipedia isn't particularly good for highly intuitive thoughts yet). Every concept has a more irreducible, generalized form for us to work out. The exception is the PSR, because it is an analytical concept not a contingent concept (remember; we are only allowed to work in a contingent form of an absolute reference space). What we really mean to say here is that our thoughts about the PSR are exactly too close to yielding no further refinement. We can reduce the floating point to the PSR, but we can't do anything more generalized with the PSR. This type of pattern of reasoning can only happen in a universe with background dependency and an absolute frame of reference (sinusoids). In such a universe, we very much can conceptually hit a "dead end" without it being a true dead end to the maximization principle and the maximization of all eternal (contingent) life. This is because we are free. We are not free however to pontificate or ponder on the source of reality forever. That would be impossible in a rational universe! It would mean the cognitive elite would get forever lost and sucked into an informational black hole. Rationality in such a universe would literally be the function of a black hole. The resolution to this is simply this: we live in a universe which allows free roaming over the entire realm of absolute, definite, necessary basis concepts (sinusoids) and this is the true "ground" of reality you're looking for (but in the objective sense without conception and decision and particularity of intent). Through your interactions with others (which is not divorced from your reading this book right now) you have already arrived at a particular conception and methodology anyway. The key is now to wield it in the way that you want it to be styled. How do you want the future to be? You are a young god.
3158
3159Dissonance is the opposite or inverse of resonance. Spiritual stories or music resonates with your soul. Endarkened people dissonate with your soul, and that's the mathematical function of our relationship to endarkened souls in terms of spatial, emotional and rational distancing.
3160
3161
3162
3163Qualia is what we get as the subjective result of what we're doing. Qualia is not the same thing as other minds' appreciations of reality. You can feel good about meeting the rational overarching understanding of what the gods and angels wanted for you, but that doesn't change reality unilaterally. Objective contingent reality is a multilaterally i.e. collectively enforced reality. Monads literally ontologically raise and extend their own very nature (conception) out of pure contingent necessity, even though their "initial technical" nature may have been considered as private. Gods and angels "silently stoically" look to the objective. They are hard and fastened in their approach towards ruthlessly maximizing outcomes for every soul. It's as though they're driving a car at such concentration you couldn't possibly interrupt them. They are fully geared for The Omega Point right now in eternity; in eternal contingent terms.
3164
3165
3166
3167
3168"Life was given to us a billion years ago. Now you know what to do with it. "
3169
3170    Lucy (2014)
3171
3172Well, now you know.
3173
3174
3175
3176What happens when you use all your capacity to become conscious? You study and pick apart every thread of how you actually coordinate your thought and your environment, and how it affects you and how your better self would be protracted (yes, down to the last detail like whether to listen to music or not). This is individuated heavily intuitively. You may not like this answer but it's conceptually the most "conceptually detailed" answer you're going to get. Full consciousness is only for the most divine, and what you're not aware of that you're choosing and selecting unconsciously, is definitionally what's missing from your conception and your conceptualization.
3177
3178Lucy is one of those movies that gets better and better the more conscious you are. You will notice a few things the second time you watch it. The best scene probably is the part around where she scoffs the food down (not to spoil the plot for you). Something about that screams hyper rationality and hyper consciousness. That scene is literally why the movie was made, in a conceptual sense.
3179
3180
3181
3182General, generalized-competence consciousness is logos thinking; neocortex thinking; study via reading and language-based thinking. "Direct" consciousness is strictly intuitive, unconscious and private thinking (detail). You mix and match both! Then there is also the spatiotemporal part of the conception equation: how to get what we want from embodied life? It is factored into the most general, irreducible possible thought (the particular conception of your mind).
3183
3184When we “catch an intuitive glimpse of something”, what does this mean?
3185
3186
3187
3188Why isn't conception simple? Think of a free Active Imagination thought scenario;- we will think of a free floating person in deep space; then a light blue surfboard can come underneath, and now you're surfing, gliding.. and now there's some stars shining brightly in deep space, and you can feel the vibes as though you were at a breezy summer evening at a tropical beach with palm trees and blue water. You feel relaxed. - See how that works? We add conceptual detail; which is to say, we compose. Composition is only possible if we could compose anyway to begin with. What's left to mention is that there's no possible way (strictly contingent or strictly eternal and necessary) or means by which these are always consistently provided to us as thoughts by some external causality. Monads must be uncaused causes, and they must have inherent free access to the whole of the sinusoidal range in infinite range, and we are just doing this in form but our percepts, our particular thoughts, can never quite provide empirical evidence of this or anything that would be thoroughly wholly convincing to those who couldn't already conceive of such things. This of course would be an impossibility, definitionally -- wouldn't be a well-formed reality -- and also this brings us to prove that everything we think, again, is contingent. We contingently arrive at things in the sense that we can construct conceptualizations freely over different parts, aspects, of conceptual contingent thoughts. The eternal and necessary has no strict appearance or structure, other than analytically being findable (composable; conceptualizable; "readable") by monads. Things don't exist -- thoughts do; conception does. Hence, god is the only thing which actually exists. Mental existence is primary (it conceptualizes freely as it wants to or is able to) and matter is only ever provisional. Percepts; and even culture and society, only get around the provisional status of their existence through being enforced over and over by minds (i.e. these are concepts of habit picked by Duty Fulfillers). We can imagine that the average person thinks in concepts which don't know that conception produces concepts. This is however undoubtedly happening all the time, and it's the only thing that happens (when we think in this way; when we conceptualize in this fashion and style). The freedom of thought is that we can think whatever we want by whatever conceptual means we want. It's a good thing, therefore, that society is free to choose and to dialectically select. We will know this acutely later on.
3189
3190
3191
3192Gods consider everyone, and everyone's maximization of Quality of Life, and everyone's maximization of actualized rational potential. That's why you can't have your easy peaceful end to the Earth story.
3193
3194
3195
3196The cost/benefit analysis is something which bestrides every single choice you make. That's why the intuition models it unconsciously. Angels reflexively use this all the time.
3197
3198
3199
3200[edit] that first use of "reflexively" needs to change somehow probably.
3201
3202
3203
3204
3205
3206"Absolute Logos is fundamentally objective and, to be objective, you have to strip out all of your subjective interpretations: your senses, your feelings, your vague intuitions, your beliefs, your opinions, your guesses, your hypotheses, your self-obsessed thinking ... Our task – if we want the ultimate answers to existence – is to transcend our senses, feelings and interpretations (all the stuff of the phenomenal, sensible world) and reach the noumenal, intelligible world accessible to reason and intuition. We must escape non-tautology and reach the eternal Platonic domain of tautology, of the eternal truths of reason. True reality is tautological reality, which is mathematical reality. Wittgenstein rejected math as “mere” tautology, empty of content about the world . In fact, objective mathematics provides the form of the world and mathematical encoding provides the subjective content. There isn’t anything else. Only when we think in terms of objective mathematics do form and content coincide."
3207
3208    Mike Hockney
3209
3210
3211
3212When you have something on your mind, you can't continue with creative acts. Resolution (of all problems from every domain of life) is conceptual and rational and mathematical. You resolve the thread and put it out of your mind, and now you have nothing to worry about and you can continue thoughts with a fresh mind.
3213
3214There is an exact science for happiness (if we work intuitively). In an elemental sense, you will be feeling more positive and upbeat and uplifted if you can connect yourself to memories and feelings you encoded with Hero Mythos stories over the years. It gets you in the right mindset. You can then sustain this, and also feel much more like you deserve the reward of the music, and the elation, if you can synthesize logos creation into the mix. This gets better if you can then even get other good soundtracks by ranging your thoughts over other pertinent issues and stories. You couldn’t make it up! This is simply an exploration of symmetry. There are different ways to locate music – we could go via indexes and methodological functions like similar artists; or we could rangefind via the extension provided by the visual space and the hyperlinking of the internet (!) as sensory unconscious Internet mindset does (“Internet addiction”). Going by “manual effort” always takes more time, so won’t actually produce the same results, hence it’s conceptually different to a more fitting method (and there can only be absolute thoughts of definitive, definite, configurations). The differently conceptual way, and thus the best fit way, is to conceptually target what you actually want to achieve – rather than going “unconsciously” (which is rather like the concept of “arbitrarily”; it’s a concept about what has no particular current conscious definition or grasp). If we think about it, the conceptual shape of finding the best music is obviously going to intersect on Hero Mythos, the Higher Self archetype, The Angel Archetype, and the most impressive human creations encoded in audio noumenal form (the Kingsman soundtrack). This is no accident, and it’s because we live in a rational, intelligible universe! The PSR necessitates and guarantees it. If we didn’t live in this type of universe, we could not select at all. To select means to find analytically a definitive, absolute, universal quality expressed over a range of infinite sinusoids (all thoughts are sinusoidal “webs”).
3215
3216What does Hero Mythos soundtrack music do? It prompts mindset. It gets you in the right state of mind, dovetailing with the mythos’ aspirations, sentiments and ideations, noumenally. If this wasn’t true, we couldn’t have a well-defined personal relationship with music. Since there is nothing to prevent this (broad band conceptual detail), it simply must be possible to formulate and configure. Ontological mathematical “software” is given by the infinite range band of sinusoids.
3217
3218
3219
3220"This is a journey of dimensionality and essentially what animals are that plants are not are life forms mobile in a very conscious way in the spatial dimension. This is why from the point of view of evolutionary biologists animals are somehow more advanced than plants. Well if conquest of dimensionality is the criteria then notice that we again occupy a special and privileged position in nature because we cannot only run with the best of them, see with the best of them but we can remember and anticipate like crazy. Other animals are not doing this. Other animals may imprint past situations of danger or opportunity but they do not analyze experience and extrapolate it towards the hidden domain of the future. Consciousness is the generalized word that we use for this coordination of complex perception to create a world that draws from the past and builds a model of the future and then suspends perceiving organism in this magical moment called the now where the past is coordinated for the purpose of navigating the future. McLuhan called it driving with the rearview mirror and the only thing that’s good about it is it’s better than driving with no mirror at all."
3221
3222    Terence Mckenna
3223
3224(Animals are sentient but not conscious.)
3225
3226Consciousness is itself a concept that we are reformulating! Imagine that. We are conceptually reorganizing our own mental contents, which of course effectively includes the things we draw out (duh!) and it comprises and amounts to the conceptual way by which we do so. The thing is that we don't move math, but we select math via sinusoids. That's the principal difference between ontological mathematics' version of conceptualization and empirical science's idea of "ad hoc", "maintenance-man" conceptualization which is constantly maintained in abstract pieces of conception conferred by hard particular percepts and their interactions. That's formally an impossible way for conception to work (not that it bothers scientists) but the good news is we don't live in that monster reality with infinite regress and bad infinity.
3227
3228We can draw from the past and look to the future, but that in itself of course won't get us anywhere. This is akin to a primordial type of thought which goes;- "balance more that way? Or more that way? More this universal general direction, or that?". There is no way to generally move or shift outcomes in your favour by some obvious, unindividuated conception pattern (that would be like gambling). Instead, what we must effectively do for all rational maximization intents and purposes, is we must reform the wavefunction in a way that's most appropriate and accordant to how everysoul else is going to act -- and this is what will allow the sentient animal to unconsciously shift itself towards better outcomes. When animals are sufficiently more than just sentient, they can reincarnate into human bodies, and the more human bodies there are on the God Game Planet, the better for them.
3229
3230We can specialize and generalize. All the things we can do, in a most general sense - are not particularly descriptive. That's why we need books, not the most fundamental generic quotes about life from philosophers of life. We have to narrow down what we want, and zero in on what we want. That often means being inspired by someone else's selections.
3231
3232Consciousness provisions more than just a temporal and spatial locality of reference. That patently isn't the purpose of consciousness! Consciousness exists, conceptually, in different grades and gradations and qualities. Consciousness is the contingent form - this is a concept open to interpretation! Just like all other concepts; but this one is particularly broad band and wide range, while also being highly particular and specialized in its outputs, we might say. Consciousness has "character". But no more can we tell from someone's conception of consciousness, for example, whether it would be safer or better to pick weeds from the garden tomorrow. This is the kind of problem that science is trying to solve. If you are a computer programmer who spends all day all month for several months on end doing programming, trying to craft the perfect computer software system that will save the world any future work - you are not considering that other souls aren't divine enough and won't meet you on the same level, hence the whole project is a moot point. This is the kind of lack of realization of the scope of the problem proposed to be solved, that scientists are stuck with. Their minds can't grasp (conceptualize) what this would amount to if we wanted to biologically trace and track all of what took place and how consciousness is working to coordinate mass production and nuclear power right now (we also have the broad phase agendas versus [human] resource pools of humanity). There simply isn't the space to work this all out on a piece of paper, or an online course, and there never will be. Conception is much more powerful in reality;- in an ontological mathematical rational universe with background dependency. Conception and concsciousness, in such a universe, don't operate as scientists think they must do (with a backlog of hard evidence and confirmation) to be able to think and execute clearly. We just do it -- it's only that, hidden behind all the unconscious mathematical proofs of sentience from before teachers asked us to "show our work" on the math tests in school, is conception which can drop and pull different variables and conditions into consciousness (or thought) whenever it wants to. We don't bring all the thought all the time.. that would be pointless and formally impossible. Thought and conception is infinitely "sleek" and "slender". It's thin, aerodynamic and flexible. It's lean. Conception is the most lean thing possible. It's free of excess fat. Scientists think we need to look for the excess fat to understand the leanness of thought, which is simply false because thought itself doesn't necessitate that we work that way. We patently don't need to understand mathematically exactly how we walk in order to produce nuclear power stations. That's just how existence manages to work, and that's because of conception – everythng else fills in the details, and we don’t all have to act as god all at once to do this (this is infact how the wavefunction works to produce full objective thoughts; with the “water-boiling” atoms working at our feet). We don't need to figure out the details when we have conceptual clarity. That's the whole point of conception: it gets you somewhere, strictly unconsciously mathematically, without knowing every single last permutation, detail and slice and corner of what you're achieving. And that is how animals crossed the threshold from sentience to consciousness. It's a conceptual difference, not an additive difference. You don't add consciousness "pieces" together as empirical science with its picture-percepts assumes. Consciousness is not pictoral, visual, spatial, temporal or perceptual. It's based on the absolute frequency range within and across infinite sinusoids, in a monadic form (the unit monad mind) mandated by the PSR. We reflect thought as we please; as we need to. Thinking is bespoke and on-demand.
3233
3234"The word bespoke has evolved from a verb meaning "to speak for something" to its contemporary usage as an adjective that has changed from describing first tailor-made suits and shoes, and later, to anything commissioned to a particular specification (altered or tailored to the customs, tastes, or usage of an individual purchaser), and finally to a general marketing and branding concept implying exclusivity and appealing to snobbery."
3235
3236    Wikipedia
3237
3238Bespoke software design is usually the way we use this word now. Consciousness is bespoke (tailored and provisioned to custom requirements); but there are no absolute, truly neutral requirements for consciousness. Consciousness must be brought about subjectively via subject-objects; monads. Conceptualization is always the origin of consciousness in eternal, ontological-form terms. Contingently we can say the origin of consciousness was the development of language via unconscious minds having some capacity for language (in their circumstances).
3239
3240Is the goal of everything consciousness, or something else? If becoming god is about achieving supersymmetry, then does that imply that a lot of it is unconscious? Here be posing a question, we have dialectically revealed something: actually, we should be looking at the particular styling and shape of consciousness – and it’s not as if we only have one type of consciousness; but much as with archetypes and stories we refer to, we actually are godlike in our capacity for these things, and we can bring many different templates of consciousness into the fold. That’s what conception accommodates. How good is your memory? Are you really implying that you can’t be that imaginative with consciousness, when the rest of your evidentiary capabilities of mind are already practically staring you in the face?
3241
3242The dialectic (within supersymmetry in fact) always allows us to climb higher. More resonant notes on the sinusoidal keyboard pivot you with the other notes in orchestra. You are making an arrangement, using them all to pivot yourself around and coordinate better things into your lap.
3243
3244Note that we force a form of the dialectic in even using brackets. It is an intuitive extension i.e. the mind leaves a little help for the next mind coming along over the content. The selection (whirring searching to find good fit) is triggered and that’s the point of the quote marks too. But specifically the use of brackets allows conceptual traversal, paving multiple roads at once (it’s the principle of maximization again you could say; but there are other properties at play here). We flatten concept onto the page, and given other variables and circumstances, we try to maximize the utility. Part of that utility will be filled in by definite-sized sentence-structures and figures of speech. We try to pack as much value on top as possible, all through the stack of possible traversals on the sentence and paragraph; and then we pack it off and say goodbye. (Note also that all these figures of speech are shorthand “lazy” optimizations by the right brain; the left brain hates the lack of clear definitive detail but the right brain is doing its best to close a holistic conception in an informative way).
3245
3246What you are seeing here in this “writing between the lines book” is a habitual attempt at hard intuition. We want to think fast and also clear. Thinking is about casting and rebounding around the soul, which must take place in a completely parallellized, intuitive sinusoidal fashion. It emphatically can’t happen any other way (“empirically”). All thought is a full-range, full-band conception across the sinusoids. It arises out of them and “in spite of them”; that is to say, it pushes ahead and outside of them. All thought is “pointed”.
3247
3248You don’t learn things expressed in this book unless you write them. Writing is actually the “final contingency”, where everything is thoroughly blown out into actualization and you are actually learning completely at the focus of writing (left brain and write brain “pens” weaving together). The highest human expression, let’s not forget, is learning. Learning in its fully truly holistic sense is actually spontaneous. It becomes spontaneous; the spontaneous becomes as it weaves. In Ancient Greece, Clotho the Spinner was said to thread your destiny. But actually it’s the tip of your soul which threads it. “You don’t know until you try!”
3249
3250We don’t coordinate just in one-directional absolute terms. We actually point different words (learning vs. conception) as the biggest absolute frame(s) of reference (bounding) to talk about; we say different pointed things in even the slightest contingently different directions around the whole sinusoidal web; because (as in over a book) we are actually ranging conceptions threading in terms of spacetime, others’ needs for individuation, our own curiosities and tightloops of interest, not overusing phrasings, and so on. Holism simply isn’t bounded whatsoever in spatiotemporal terms (“slices”), which is why science gets everything wrong.
3251
3252The pressures of your life are manifested and living in your soul; charmed and tamed and working for you as your demons that you rent out and set to work. It’s the sinusoidal symmetry you want to focus on. Bound in that is selection, and thus conception. Semantics (winning against the demons) was of course always conceptual, and nothing to do with mortal social standing, extroversion or the like! What a ride!
3253
3254
3255
3256
3257
3258"The problem with this is that it does not fulfill out intuitions about reality. We can see that evolution, biological evolution, has built on chemical systems. We can see that social and historical systems build on biology. As people with open minds or as open as they can be inside this culture, we nevertheless have this intuition of purpose and it is dramatically underscored by the psychedelic experience, which takes the raw material of your life, your culture, your history and tells you this is not an existential mishmash to be lived out with dignity because there’s nothing else to be done with it – some kind of Camusian ‘why not’ affirmation. It says no. It says your reality is a coherent cosmos and embedded in your own sense of identity, embedded in your own sense of purpose is a microscopic reflection of the larger purpose that is built into the universe. Now this is not just blowing smoke in the sense of ‘it’s a nice idea’ or its like a religious idea like saying Jesus loves you so feel alright about yourself. It isn’t like that. It’s a theory about reality that has teeth because reality is actually following the script that this particular version of reality dictates. Reality is accelerating towards an unimaginable omega point. "
3259
3260    Terence Mckenna
3261
3262Freedom from mental schema and rehearsal is very important. You however don't need to take psychedelics at all at any point in your life. (Different statements evaluate differently for different people - and then we dialectically formulate something new - hey presto;- we now have a rational proof for the benefits of conceptualizing how other people think!)
3263
3264All things are interoperable conceptual math. The potential is theoretically wide and open. It takes decisive acts however, not just INTP thought, to achieve things.
3265
3266The power of semantics is amazing. That's why stories are so fulfilling. We can project rational beautification of our world as a real possibility.
3267
3268Conceptual thinking this deep is really quite powerful. Mckenna here is actually drilling down into how the world unfolds. At the root of how we behave is actually conception - and contingent conception actually comes in intelligible, knowable forms. We can change and adapt everything if we can become conscious of exactly that which we'd need to change.
3269
3270These are very pure thoughts he's had, about the type and nature of universe we've got. We are, moreover, the acting agency of that universal process of becoming. Rather than march along, what we can do is we can hold out the questioning clause and wrap it over everything we're doing. That's what he's done here. If you never proceeded thought without questioning it first (as if you could slow down thought further or remove it from hasty rote routine assumptions) then you could achieve quite a lot. Similarly, without ever using psychedelics in your entire life you can just lie down in bed, close your eyes and think. If you don't want to be influenced ("informed") by social contexts and embodied life's percepts and symbolic pivots to get you there, you can try crossing liminality of sleep a bit to think.
3271
3272Of course, the task here when thinking about McKenna's thoughts is not to dwell on his contents, but to think ourselves.
3273
3274The prominence and presence of "dignity" here is actually akin to a rotated dream symbol. This is a little part of how the right brain communicates its frequency observations: symbols, templates, motifs - which are all interconnected with other things.
3275
3276" Left Brain
3277
3278Scientist, mathematician, logician.
3279
3280Categorization, accuracy, linearity, analysis, strategy, practicality, control, realism, mastery of words and language, calculation, equations, order, thinking, reason, rationalism, Apollonian.
3281
3282
3283Right Brain
3284
3285Free Spirit, artist.
3286
3287Creativity, passion, yearning, sensuality, movement, vivid colours, imagination, art, poetry, sensing, feeling, Dionysian.
3288
3289The optimal world belongs to both Apollo and Dionysus, not to one or the other. And we need female balance too. Sophia (wisdom) is Apollo’s counterpart, and Aphrodite is Dionysus’s.
3290
3291Autistics are extremely linear. They can do only one thing at a time. They are amazed by the ability of “norms” to multi-task.
3292
3293Women are often said to be much better at multi-tasking than men, who are often said to be overly linear in their approach. Autism is often described as an “extreme male brain” condition.
3294
3295"
3296
3297    Mike Hockney
3298
3299
3300
3301The actual best arcs of consciousness are those of highly intuitive dialectical inflexion. You make an imaginary statement in a book or whatever - or you imagine saying it aloud to the world - and then suddenly, because it's something dialectically based on capitalism in view of Mike Hockney's work for example, you suddenly find yourself having to retract that will and backpedal. This is the dialectic operating at a highly conscious, highly language-based, interaction-based level in the sense that what's happening is highly intelligent. If you spend your time around the least of the intelligent ideas, and the least of the exchange of language circumscribing/surrounding these considerations, then you won't make much progress in a sense which you can estimate based in an absolute mathematical reference space. Since we are now conscious of the fundamentals (the backdrop to existence), we can be more confident of certain elemental assertions and intuitions. Knowledge is thus power, but some knowledge is conceptually better than others. Ontological mathematics (metaphysics and mathematical philosophy) is the conceptually highest form and category of knowledge.
3302
3303(Or you write your own book. It could be trash, and you need to share it to help figure that out.)
3304
3305Authors can appear as bicameral to us, as if we imagine their response and await their hypothetical reply. Bicameralism also allows two people in a relationship to have imaginary conversations with one another. Think about what the use of the mind is when it is highly intuitive. Why not break all the rules? Why not achieve absolute freedom? The only limit is your imagination. You are supposed to consciously coordinate your life so that you get the very most out of it. You are deliberately supposed to set up things in certain highly unconventional ways. That is one of the Higher Self's conclusions and its messages.
3306
3307
3308
3309From an empiricist standpoint, we are 50+ years into space age technology and yet we haven't made much progress as we still push out individual keystrokes to program computers. The difference here of course is wholly in conceptual detail. If your conception isn't detailed enough, you can't make wide-sweeping conclusions! Certainly not well-formed. The difference is that society has conceptually advanced in various myriad tree-leaves along the consciousness wavefunctions of each conscious mind, while the spatiotemporal domain and its mind-body interface has "suffered" none of this. Bodies don't suffer evolution; minds do. Concepts suffer evolution; percepts don't necessarily have to and often don't. The moon doesn't evolve as a percept and neither does the broad band of the Earth. Yet we are still a far more conscious species than 1000 years ago! What we are left with here is an arbitration of selection for which spatiotemporal fluctuations in percept might constitute better conscious evolution. The right answer is of course that objectivity and conceptual minds are what produce these fluctuations and variations -- since minds are subject-objects. In a universe of pure percept, the entire objective wavefunction would have to change for consciousness to be significantly upgraded (since minds would be totally prone to being informed by percepts, and none by concepts). That means Earth couldn't be Earth to produce a different kind of consciousness in this fictional, ill-defined type of reality.
3310
3311Angels don't get tired because it's all in how they think and conceptualize. If you have rooted out all the things that wronged you, annoyed you and distracted you (individuation), then you wouldn't have anything left in your mental conception to stop you. Someone once said that the more problems you solve with yourself, the more that appear. Well, that's certainly the character which initially presents before you, but as Sisyphus didn't push his boulder up a hill that had no background dependency, everything we do in reality has an actual utility, definition and effect, and introverted intuition and thinking primarily has an effect on restructuring the very way that we think (we upgrade ourselves). This means that we only climb a finite amount in the end. What's more, it means that as we ascend higher and become more intuitive, it becomes easier mentally to gather ourselves and our efforts (conceptually).
3312
3313To read, you conceptually rationally focus an analytical reticle (your eyes’ analytical, “imaginary”, extended, “raycasted” point of interest in 3d space) over a screen, in absolute (“decisive”) terms, and you have decided (conceived) to mix this with right-to-left reading motion in the relationship that time moves. With respect to time you carry out this function which is strictly a zero-dimensional generalized mathematical expression (conception). In FPS games, players coordinate different abstract goals by wielding the unconscious transformations of simple linear vector math as they “carry” (extend) the 2d reticle mathematics (aiming) and the complex plane (2d math to zero dimensional math using complex numbers) and the 3d math of the virtual game physics-engine space. All the mathematical spaces are brought together in the grand conception of decisions, strategy and skill. The best video gamers can demonstrate a conscious mixing of conscious thinking (meta thought about all variables outermost available to strategy) and the raw unconscious powerhouse of generally optimized unconscious math which typically oozes from pro gamers. The ultimate conscious battlefield is ontological mathematics, where the angels and gods are playing the game with you – cooperatively!
3314
3315[My unconscious offered the word “outmost” there as a revision (as it was faster for it to resolve the sentence with – faster for my right brain, hence the recommendation). Am I teaching my unconscious reason now by the style that I commit things to it?]
3316
3317One of my middle school teachers did a brilliant thing for us. It was an English lesson, and she started to mention words – she said them to introduce them to us – and then she simply asked the class to suggest something “more specific” and then “more generic”. She made us get more specific (vehicle → car → wheel) and then flipped it on us. This would have had the most profound effect on my intelligence considering the rest of the school curriculum. She repeated the task and it was actually fun and exciting. She pushed us to come up with specific - “no, more Specific!”; “no, more generic!” (she even stressed emphasis for us) until we unconsciously grasped the concept. That was key. She never said anything else, but expected us to get it and it clicked after a while. She knew what she was doing. This was an incredible teaching idea and I am lucky to have had her as a teacher. I do remember her surname.
3318
3319The purpose of isolation from the world’s events and people and news is to better focus, think and concentrate. That’s what school as a young child was about. After school, you were supposed to figure out how to stay balanced and stabilized, rather than focus your intuition on literally everything happening in the world (or in my case this was very informative). Consciousness, individuation, is the destination, either way – and it must be “coherently” supplied, visited and provisioned. Intuition is a gift but not the whole gift. Calm, comfort, concentration, the immersion in the sensory are useful as opposed to the purely intuitive conception of life. Our running conception of habit must be raised and lifted to a better more healthy form – the principal indexes we have for this are what it affords us the means to achieve. What is achievement to you? You want full broad band awareness; you want consciousness and competency. You want to be doing and formulating the acts which most free you to do this. You want to be visiting the Higher Self content by the nature of your generalized conceptulization for how to live life well. You want to serve yourself well and this means you must live for yourself and make it comfortable. Various conceptual mathematical expressions can be given for introverted life. One middle school teacher told us, when we wrote something, to “describe it”. She had us begin by writing in the form, “as X gets bigger, Y gets smaller”. Remember that the unconscious mind has none of these basis conceptual ingredients built into monadic life as necessary existence. This spells the uniqueness of minds everywhere.
3320
3321When you’re calm and isolated, you can keep to your better nature and be re-minded of that; with “recharging” from society you can regather and recollect yourself. You have a point of reference in Self terms; in spiritual terms; in rational terms; and the use of free time is that you can use it to maximize your potential or you can mix up different life lessons, knowledge, or things you can coordinate with it. Extroverted intuition, and intuiting about percepts and the things happening and all the people in the world/nation and the collective unconscious – this is a different kind of thinking which can cause trouble, upset, distraction, obsession, anxiety. It doesn’t emotionally serve you well; but it can be of some ratonal informative use.
3322
3323You have to be sufficiently distanced from people due to disparities of a rational, conceptual type. It’s never one distinct theme or aspect of character of circumstance in itself; it’s the whole thing; the broad band conception. We need friends at least initially to individuate. We need to become whole as a person, which comes with the rest of our lives and interpenetrations sinusoidally and is never isolated as a cordoned-off aspect; neither is there any off-the-shelf solution. “That’s life”. Life isn’t one-dimensional and thus all your pains, insecurities and goals aren’t either. Only angels would generally have the acuity of mind to completely divorce themselves from needing romantic relationships – why do you think that is? It’s all in the math. It’s a conceptual difference. You can radically change life circumstances for yourself by evolving sinusoidal parallellism within you, and it’s this aspect of reality not whether you’re in a relationship or not; or whether you’re currently living in poverty or not, or whether you feel a good fit in society or not, or whether you have a well-established personal image or not, or whether you’re well-adjusted to modern life or not, or whether you own a home or car. These are, for an angel, simply unnecessary in all stripes, because the angel has The Holy Grail instead which eclipses all possible unconscious reaches and aspirations as regards “personal” goals. It’s simply the lower human psyche which reaches for these things which seem to it (to the Darkness in the dark soul) to lift it out of spiritual poverty. But sinusoidal supersymmetry is spiritual Light, and that’s exactly what the Divine ontologically actually is. The thing rarely noted is that as you evolve, you can mathematically sinusoidally individuate in all that space and character of depth (broad band conception over an infinite range of sinusoids) to become a little, but definitively definite, closer to a god.
3324
3325All the difference to everything is encapsulated in conception (the monad’s conceptualization) and conceptual differences. In here is located the difference between an angel and a human, and it’s nowhere else. Such a notion is formally impossible in ontological mathematics.
3326
3327Sufficient distance from people means gracefully withdrawing if they cannot meet your conception. The trick with life is focusing your intensities on what will further your efforts and your skills the most. That’s how you can develop competency, comfort, self-respect, and everything that flows from maximum actualized potential. How do you feel good about yourself? How do you create meaning? How do you save your soul? How do you live with yourself? These are extremely deep questions but they all have a common, convertent answer or truth: achieving increased sinusoidal symmetry in infinite dimensions. Individuation is a particular slice of this, such as interpersonal individuation (social consciousness and romantic, relationship self-awareness) but individuation of course comes in all possible flavours; not just any one type. Some writers stressed not to follow in their path but find your own, and this was the reasoning for doing so. Bruce Lee stressed that each discipline of martial arts – each school of fighting – was not the best, but what was best was something to be found by constant striving for greatness. What was desirable was the irreducible quality.
3328
3329
3330 “Its like a finger pointing away to the moon. Dont concentrate on the finger or you will miss all that heavenly glory.”
3331
3332― Bruce Lee
3333
3334It’s all in the conception, and conception is selection. Life comes with our conception of it. Thus we get the statement, “life is what you make of it”. Life is rooted in conception and conceptualization, which delivers problem-solving routines; patterns and methodologies; selections; strategies; as well as ideological and religious and spirital/metaphysical expressions.
3335
3336Unconsciousness leaves you with a suboptimal selection/expression. That’s definitionally what it does in the most general sense of the individualistic (assessment) context.
3337
3338There “classically” could have been considered - “what’s moral/powerful for the extreme individualist”, and “what’s moral/powerful in view of the others”. These present two radically different context in which to place our containers-oriented values of life principles spread all across the range of modern public life. This is a dialectical opposition we can have with the conscious self, and this one is something all school children who are thinkers should be able to grasp and use throughout life.
3339
3340
3341"Voidness is that which stands right in the middle between this and that. The void is all-inclusive, having no opposite -- there is nothing which it excludes or opposes. It is living void, because all forms come out of it and whoever realizes the void is filled with life and power and the love of all beings."
3342
3343― Bruce Lee
3344
3345What we’re looking for is that which dovetails beyond and between the things we’re not after in life – the perfect sinusoidal (not one-dimensional) formulation. A god exists in infinite sinusoidal terms but expresses something which never either oversteps or understeps. The god doesn’t overstep its station, and neither does the angel;- neither do they do less than what they should do. How is this possible?- Principally, because they don’t exist like we do from a frame of reference of going to use physical work, talk to people, to do things and get things done – they are using a similar basis reality to do that (sinusoidal expression of infininte banding) but they are doing wholly fundamentally different expressions in this basis reality, which run circles around our own and are acrobatic in comparison. We are made of the same substance of angels (soul contents) but in a radically different configuration. The difference is a conceptual difference, not an additive difference. It’s all in the math! In ontology, conception is expression. Gods conceive, because conception can encapsulate everything else at its highest most evolved point (its sinusoidal webbed expression and configuration over the spread of infinite basis sinusoids).
3346
3347
3348What does the dialectic achieve? What does presenting a book or a piece of music to someone achieve? What does asking people creative help questions achieve? It “makes you conscious of” the things you cannot habitually contain to mind all the time. Angels don’t have this problem, but human “knowledge” is mathematically circumscribed around dynamic, broad band conceptual factors, which are not particulars until we encounter them. We cannot dialectically bring to mind vast reaches of particular through-and-threadbare fully-formed conceptually-completed thoughts on our current circumstance. The reason for this, if you want a particularly clear thought here – is that our circumstance cannot come into actualization until we operate on the precise contents. Gods don’t have this problem, but angels infact do. Angels cannot precalculate what it would be like to reconfigure Earth or other God Game Planets in phenomena at scale. Angels in particular are looking for ways to improve the conceptual “focus” of their minds (their basis conception and conceptual ability; conceptual competency; conceptualization and supersymmetry) so that they can be independent finally of material spacetime existence altogether. Don’t forget – the reason for all this is that we simply cannot know the content of what everyone else is doing (updated current conditions of people, and variables concerning ourselves) enough to know what will happen and how we will change things, all in advance. Although it may look a sloppy strategy to have to go present yourself to someone in some organization again each time (whether school, university or a spiritual organization), this is exactly the form which was necessary for that action to take – you could not reasonably be expected to have achieved it otherwise. Interaction is fundamentally necessary, as long as it’s in the places and spaces where your work needs rational fulfilment.
3349
3350When someone else checks over your book (a “fresh pair of eyes”), their internal conceptual contents (since they aren’t carrying the percepts with them everywhere!) are triggered differently because of the way they encounter the paragraphs which are ordered, for their mind, according their internal conceptual knowledge interpenetrating the new concepts you’ve introduced in various places in the book (but you’re not sure if the definitions were placed early enough before using them freely on something). We can’t conceptualize about this outside of how well we know this other person’s mind. But the way they will look over our work is a conceptual difference to that of our own perceptual run-over. It’s very different the second time you read a book where the contents sunk in.
3351
3352The dialectic of interaction with an entire world presses you with thoughts and ideas you’d never come across (in the formulant combination) in the same way isolated by yourself on your own. This is not conceptually obvious so far here in this explanation, but what about the actuality of your totality of self in that someone reveals for you that you didn’t have a close friendship for a month? Or what about the kind of thought like the meaning and utility of exciting things you can do with an acute range of people and personalities? You emphatically cannot think about these things because they don’t enter conception in your usual style of conception (like being amazing friends with someone you don’t know it’s possible with until it happens). That’s the dialectic’s utility, function and gain in you (except conceptually). Dialectical visitation of noumena and phenomena influenced by noumenal forces, yields qualities that other souls act on, and this produces things you’d never be able to remember on your own and bring to your mind on your own. We literally need other people to think in deep, meaningful, effective ways about broad-sweeping wide-ranging issues. Do angels? Angels are searching for what they’re missing; the last lost pieces to god; what they don’t know. Animals are using what they don’t know to find what they don’t see; humans are finding what they don’t know to find what they know is a vague nebulous aspiration or life goal; angels know so much they are narrowing down the last items consciously at the apex of consciousness that is not god-consciousness. And all this also happens right now on Earth and it influences the world events with all the brilliant variations of the other people who think in sporadically different ways! And you didn’t think of that before, did you? What arised the concept? Did the percept arise it? Did another monad arise it? (Which is a useless designation because it has no clear utility in the frame of the viewer that the percept applies to; for our book entitled theory of “concept to percept”). The only thing we are left with, is not a “linear causational model”, but that mind has sporadic, rotating blitzing swizzling types of conception within all unit monads. That’s at least something solid and conceptual we can say about the whole deal at large. We then range to particulars – but we have to use the disjointments and pivots of this book to get the better contexts for the conceptual details, which is what the rest of this ook deals with. (And that’s conceptual). The only answer which ranges across all monads is the general conceptual one, which will be to do with an absolute point of ontological reference! It turns out as a corollary to this then; that you can have more specific (detailed) conceptual answers; it’s just that they’re not generally sharable with other minds which is what we typically principally aim for when writing a book. With music or artworks, you can produce highly narrow and niche interests. With conscious writing, either you write for a large audience via popular compossibility, or you write for an intelligent audience via rational intellectual compossibility, or you write for heartfelt compossibility (poetry). In writing there is typically no trashy contributions as in the ersatz or the kitsch. Trolling is a social venture with social goals and thus social conception to it.
3353
3354The principal strategies for avoiding the dialectism of everyone else are: becoming rich; becoming jaded and desensitized; substance abuse; suicide; closing yourself off from others (withdrawal, isolation, escapism); living ignorant of politics and the future; closing yourself off from opportunities to develop yourself. All the other strategies are geared towards engaging the world’s dialectic at various forms, scopes and appreciations.
3355
3356If you think on it hard, you should be able to tell that souls like angels and ourselves cannot bring ourselves dialectically within any reasonable capacity to talk on issues we’ve already been through. The coordination is so difficult and time intensive that it presents a poor cost/benefit ratio. This means you cannot help someone with something you struggled with growing up unless you know the exact generalized-most way of giving this to the general group (the community who can read and will be able to select, coordinate, towards what you’re writing and find it). Everything is about conception and conceptual modelling and estimation. We can’t have the intrinsic motivation, the good faith, to cover something we don’t wholeheartedly see a point in. We become worn out, burned out and stressed very quickly – unless there are other conditions attached, like survival, or a romantic connection, or a pitying sympathy for someone (but this is overreaching, unhealthy Shadow Empathy and Shadow Compassion tied to our own psychological complexes and neuroses; our own badly formed projections about the suffering of another, which is not a rational understanding).
3357
3358Angels want us to understand as much as we can – but think of it like this;- you cannot conceptually target all the right things for someone else to learn from at their non-generic, specific route and path of development at their juncture. Teachers in human society can only teach general, public truths and they can’t share private strategies. You cannot know. Definitionally, you can’t think for someone else and no amount of their interaction with you would somehow prepare them any better, dialectically, for their learning and progress. In fact, this is exactly how people can’t tell when someone is far smarter than them. If an angel appeared around you, you couldn’t ask it any interesting things (for the angel), and it couldn’t say anything particularly helpful to you (unless there was a global, civilizational, rational spiritual context which provided intrinsic motivation for the angel to help solve, as in the test of one’s rational capabilities; or as in the flexing of pure intuition as in Carl Jung’s dream analysis service).
3359
3360The way people interact operates via certain knowable conceptual means. It doesn’t operate in any forced way that we want it to. This is the maximization principle at work across monads of varying particular states with highly particular mental contents. Only the most highly intuitive souls are “on the same page” regarding everything!
3361
3362As for personality types; certain people are massively compatible with us than others, and we’d never have guessed it until we made extremely healthy, curious connections with them. Some people can be highly intuitively close (INFP/J), or highly rationally close (E/INTJ) but clash too much with you via intuition. Some people can be intuitively and rationally close, lucid dreamer, talented creatively (ENFP) which can mesh well with you if you’re a heavy Ni user.
3363
3364
3365
3366"Art reaches its greatest peak when devoid of self-consciousness. Freedom discovers man the moment he loses concern over what impression he is making or about to make."
3367
3368- Bruce Lee
3369
3370In other words, if you have a relaxed calm right-brain holistic disposition, and if you assume everything will go well by default and if you don’t care or scrutinize/criticize too much, then your creative juices will flow freely and you’ll get something out of it, and you’ll be able to develop this first with Grand Leap Creativity (initial concept or an unconsciously drawn flowing concept) and engage Incremental Creativity over it. But that isn’t the height of art for everyone; it’s the height of art for a particular scoping of use-case and agenda (the hint and the key is in the only definition we only actually gave it, which is a conception of our own making and constraining and defining). Art for yourself can have much higher standards of actualizable, deliverable zonings and your conception of high art can also have aesthetic dimensions; psychological dimensions; emotional soothing and ego dimensions; Superego and Id dimensions; Self dimensions; Shadow dimensions.. the list is as endless as the sinusoidal signals are. Art, like everything else, bobs and weaves the expressions but – being highly conscious humanity – you could still style your own circumstances for your creativity if you could consciously grasp how these patterns pan out for yourself in actualization and what variables and conditions bring you there to the generally idealizable state and which ones dont’t or are antithetical to achieving it.
3371
3372Anyone can unconsciously begin creating things – we do in our dreams! Isn’t that one fascinating? We can also decide to create music from pure whimsical ebbs and flows of feelings. One little trick is to try alcohol with music creation, if you can’t access your emotions properly at first. You also need to be decisive and serious about actually creating something and engaging your creative animal (i.e. buy the proper equipment and stop trying to squeeze potential out of a tight-and-narrow space as possible). Rationality will guide you in the general sense of what would be most likely to be compossible with better future outcomes and preparations for what you’d like to be doing with yourself.
3373
3374Your standards limit you; which is to say, your consciousness limits you! Isn’t that astounding? It’s exactly how we become unconscious via dreams that paves the way for strange, unsettling and revealing “neurodiverse” strands of our unconscious complexes start getting exposed. We are accidentally tripping over ourselves with the power of individuation. A highly conscious, rational, individuating mind starts to unconsciously accidentally access such a lot of important mental contents in the unconscious underbelly phase of its life, especially if it has particularly tough ways to manage its waking life due to stress. Stress informs the mind to produce extra-vivid dream content at times, in response not to “non-background-dependent-reality” “flat” stress of arbitrary designation, but of course the real, genuine, true rational conceptual problems embedded and encoded in that stress. One example is that people in the modern world can have apocalyptic dreams due to political and spiritual and environmental events/news. Many people mentioned dreaming about Donald Trump personally arriving in their dreams and interacting with them. It turns out that just as we might expect from a rational universe, the only dreams which can principally be produced are those that reflect the underbelly of waking life and the human psyche we carry with us. The exception and the conceptual tail to this would be aspects like sensory types’ fascination with wall tiles (someone out there today is sexually attracted to wall tiles with mathematical patterns!) and other neurodiverse straits of the human mind. Some people will express cognitive preference towards dreaming about their pets, or other conceptual elements pertinent to them. Dreams of the Self then force minds to be informed by percepts in ways which unconsciously reflect the Self (like meeting your dead pet in a dream and being able to get a bit of closure).
3375
3376Need we remind ourselves that the previous paragraph was creativity and completely spontaneous and written out at a normal typing speed. The difference is that we are engaging the unconscious and its holism In Good Faith. We are not pretending to be anything that we are not; we are not making hasty judgements; we are zoning in unconsciously on some pertinent, relevant, suitable rational content (ontological mathematics and psychology etc.) and we are producing some real thoughts by coordinating what generates interest. Nothing has been forced, so the PSR actually dictates here that no sufficient space is left for anything untoward or anything directional of a different kind of purpose (like ill-defined will). Nothing about this is “patient”, “apathetic” or low-energy. Simply, a transition and reconfiguration of eternal full-scale full-stack sinusoidal contents has occurred, and we are approaching the problem in a generally appropriate way. The mind which is your own particular mind of course has very specific, particular qualities – and you serve yourself well therefore if you stick to the rational qualities and rational contents that suit your taste for development! It’s all in the math. But we don’t at all have to be capable of talking about conscious math anywhere in our writing, to be able to do this. Individuation and hyper rationality show the way. The angels archetypally and psychologically and psychodramatically “show” the way (i.e. it is reducible and resolvable by hard, rational, analytical, intuitive thinking). There is no direct answer to existence because contingent dialectical advances are always dialectical, and must always be properly posed and formed according to your own mind.
3377
3378When you write sentences In Bad Faith, you stop immediately because you trace the dialectical dead-end ahead and you see the moot point and the lost cause. You reformulate an action plan and that’s your next step (using the principle of maxmization). This is all carried out completely unconsciously in the throes of life until you become conscious of it. But – everyone’s doing it! Isn’t that fab? We get there dialectically, of course. When you’re writing a “hot” sentence your mind races unconsciously to find a cherry-picked word (because you’re excited, of course! You mesh well with it in terms of acutalization of potential and rational motivation). When you’re writing an iffy sentence, your unconscious lapses and flops, signifying to you that you should stop or seek another way. Consciousness in this sense is simply how well we respond to our own unconscious!
3379
3380We mix and match for the best dialectical output/advantage. All choices are of this nature. We pick with a discerning hand; a discerning eye – a conceptual one! Angels and gods are of course “discerning” in everything they do.
3381
3382
3383
3384
3385
3386
3387"Turn into a doll made of wood: it has no ego, it thinks nothing, it is not grasping or sticky. Let the body and limbs work themselves out in accordance with the discipline they have undergone."
3388
3389- Bruce Lee
3390
3391Here we can see a principle of unconscious maximization where the fighting-body is the conceptual focus and where you tune out all the things which are not strictly mathematical and unconsciously optimizable. This is supposedly supposed to help with general coordination of the fighting technique – but where, Bruce? What else do we need that we don’t have? The thing is, you don’t actually win by shutting off your strategy mind and putting horse blinders onto it. Even when you’re playing up against pro gamers online, you actually can beat them by conceptually mixing conscious neocortex strategy bits and drabs (staying around your teammates in a predatory shark fashion like they do in one sense) and raw unconscious intuitive powerhousing in the other hand, which is where gamers intuitively know the positions of other players on the map (!!!) looking around like sharks or primordial fishing Jaguar animals; or the likelihoods of these in general extents, drawing upon spatiotemporal knowledge, player habits knowledge, game map spatial memory(!) and unifying all these together in the same zero-dimensional mind space using broad band holistic parallel thinking (intuition). You absolutely can destroy someone in a match and he’ll obsessively come and glitch-cover his way across the map, zig-zag up to you and give you a gnasher blast to the face leaving everyone who tried to take him down around you, stunned. Such is the power of unconscious mathematics! It’s breathtaking; we might even say, a religious experience.
3392
3393If you watch fast-paced shooter video game footage, it can become apparent if you think on it, that actually the mind is “in” the game now and is mathematically interfacing with the actual numbers in the video game land (the math which turns the character, aims the gun, and takes mathematical conditional shelter from gunfire). The soul has no body. Do the souls of pro gamers intimately understand the smaller numbers? What we can also realize that the mind is using arcs of purely analytical mathematical sweeping and shaping (the word “sweeping” here comes from video game physics engine internals) in estimation of what the distances and opportunities will be. When another player enters the player’s peripheral, the players both have a split second to sweep the aiming reticle a certain rotational distance and shoot when close enough for a kill. This becomes particularly entrenched into a video game’s “meta” mechanics as it’s often called, when players start being evolved for instant kills by precisely judging distance to kill in one shot. The result is this: extreme mental flow (with a fast reload timing mechanic), extreme exhilaration, extreme elation when you get it right, and a whole lot of adrenaline. It’s a lot of fun (if you can see any point in it anymore, given other objectives which are more appealing now to the conscious mind instead).
3394
3395Bruce Lee was obsessed with what he called the “formless”. Poetically, that’s a way to describe divine thought. In reality, thought doesn’t exist in dimensions of zero upwards, but across infinite sinusoids – positive and negative crossed with real and imaginary numbers – all of which are necessarily utilized by all minds continuously in whichever ways they see fit or are caused to. So, Bruce Lee was talking about the irreducible quality of.. what? He was attempting to talk about contingent thought, but this is inherently of dialectical evolution a particular strand different and non-background-relatable for each individual soul which this applies to. The non-background-relatable problem is the category error of trying to impose a unilateral universality (individual contingent thought about the absolute) onto a multilateral domain (all minds; the monadic collective). You can’t have a concept for that! It’s not well-formed. But what you can have is your own consciousness of how your own mental contents are affected and influenced by certain percepts and “perceptual” superstructures of conception (you can tell how a person or a favourite object influences your life, consciously) and you have the principal means (thinking) to consciously reflect on this. What you don’t have is a hypothetical ultimate god-consciousness where you can “see” all the possible thoughts that would help everyone in every circumstance and eventuality projected several ways for each individual soul at all moments. Either gods can actually think this way, or it’s not formally possible. You would have to be extremely intelligent to draw the correct conclusion here.
3396
3397We have an uncommon, unique sinusoidal Thought Signature. We have a common objective Percept Environment Interface.
3398
3399
3400
3401"Give up thinking as though not giving it up. Observe techniques as though not observing."
3402
3403- Bruce Lee
3404
3405In other words, use parallel thinking; intuition. That’s the kind of thinking that you don’t have to consciously do, yet reveals hidden patterns precisely because you didn’t assume dogmatic contents and presumptions about appearances determining what you conceive. You drop certain conditions and variables out of your conception; an example is deciding not to assume anything about transgender people, but to talk to one and get to know them and figure out if it’s really something you want to be against; you can be left with a spiritual feeling of having united with “allies”. We are dropping, reforming and conceptually rotating our conceptual contents all the time. We emphatically must be, to be able to put ourselves to different tasks, jobs, disciplines (creative disciplines), domains (activity domains and the other knowledge domains), and mindsets (spirituality, introversion, deep introverted thinking, brainstorming(!), problem solving).
3406
3407We invented words for these things which seem distinct schematic categories to us (work, play, rest, entertainment, society) but underneath these is mathematical grand-sweeping expressions of sinusoidal infinite depth/height and detail.
3408
3409Intuition is fundamentally different from serial, logical left-brained thinking. The right brain is holistic while the left brain would focus on logic, details, pertinent precise analytical carving, Hegelian logical structure and consistency.
3410
3411In addition, intuition can serve the role of an antithesis functionality or provision (that social game where you take turns drawing things and people shout out what you’re drawing), so the unconscious is able to be “socially settled” into whatever tasking role it is drawn to serve by the left brain’s world-coordinating nature, or the soul’s spiritual nature alternatively for mystical intuitives. In Alma Deutscher’s case, the Higher Self sits as the bicameral master of a psyche growing up in a family, and the Higher Self doesn’t exactly know how to holistically begin deriving something of world domination, but instead it holistically resolves ways to help the left brain localist existence of this new Self that it’s been formulated into by its external interpenetrating circumstances (the society and the people it needs to interact with for survival, emotional completion, etc). The soul runs the individual because the soul is where we get our basis ideas, inspirations, life goals, ambitions and spiritual concerns from; but we can also run our conceptions up: survival, feeding, protracting ourselves for abstract materialistic goals, getting somewhere on time tomorrow, changing our sleep cycle, ridding ourselves of anxieties, preparing for a date, deciding whether some content will emotionally satisfy us or not - or psychologically satsify - or spiritually satisfy. There are both left brain and right brain priorities to life. There is analytical thinking and holistic thinking.
3412
3413Writing is mostly unconscious because you don’t know what you will be writing yet, and that’s the whole point. You don’t impose rigid structure with writing. Writing is the “ghost art” where you are not surprised at words just appearing to the text cursor on the page. This is because we’re not empiricists – we’re conscious! But we are also unconscious. We are conception that doesn’t fully know the full range of the absolute sinusoids at its command. We individuate around the pivots and rollcages of eternal life and its events. Some of this is informed from the planet, but life is also a journey of the Self and this can be easy to forget. The purpose of calm is to focus and deliver and achieve in the introverted sense.
3414
3415Things will come up when they can, and we will figure out our dialectical response then. Don’t stress about writing. As the saying goes: “We’ll cross that bridge when we come to it”. Everything gets its dialectical chance, and it’s your responsibility to conceptually steer yourself generally in the right direction, from the outermost – most fundamental, primary decisions, selections and habits – and then your good nature will fill out the gaps unconsciously for you, as the dialectic moves on via wavefunction collapses. More often than not, you need to fix the outsides first before you can function your best. The outside conditions and variables (getting your life in order) are pretty important. What are “the fundamentals of life”? How do you rank them? This is actually an incredibly poignant topic, and should be explored in schools.
3416
3417Did we do the issue justice? That’s the unconscious “feeling” (impression, not expression) you get with considering and pondering a percept and what it does for you and what you can bring to the issue. Of course, percepts throw up all kinds of things don’t they; because they requisite/loan our whole soul in the process. What are we doing, if not reflecting internal conceptual contents of the soul? The key is that we are using all the sinusoidal frequencies of infinite range; so of course this wouldn’t directly consciously appear to us and reveal itself so. The primary tool we have aside conscious math of the mathematics studying, for figuring out our thought, is this: we traverse and visit unconscious individual “issues”, problems and scenarios, from the way that we style and coordinate our lives, through our choices. What is the mind doing when it’s writing? It’s not eating, going to the shop, sleeping.. it’s doing “something else”! It’s crossed from the left brain spatial domain of reference and the spatial locality of keyword-percept-referencing (physical acts classifications) into the event horizon for spacetime existence of souls’ personalities: the mind is delving deep into the unconscious and that’s why people say we are “with our head in the clouds” or “absentminded”. Perception is not reality! Only conception is. Conception is broad band holistic substance, rather than holistic conceptual particular parts and rims and outer edges (the right brain component of our individual thoughts).
3418
3419
3420Creativity and deep introversion are the thing that’s not the thing, to any mind that’s unaware of full context. Subjectivity is what one soul experiences its own full context in; we are subject-objects so our conceptualization ranges depending on whether we consciously grasp right now the fundamentals and factors of some objective principle, or some other, or some subjective impression (art) or another. We are never staying in one place. The mind is continuous, eternal motion, delivered in each sinusoidal signal case by the mathematical flowing point – as described by The God Series #32 and The Truth Series.
3421
3422
3423
3424"The question then arises of how any extended thing can be compounded from unextended points. The answer lies in Fourier motion, i.e. Fourier mathematics applied to motion. The unextended points of ontological mathematics are actually autonomous frequency domains, which involve infinite points in eternal dimensionless motion. This dimensionless motion can, via Fourier mathematics, be translated into dimensional motion involving space and time (with time just being imaginary space). Motion, in the dimensionless domain, produces no net dimensionality. However, motion, in the dimensional domain, creates an effective dimensionality. This is because points in motion are never at any particular location but are always in the act of moving from one location to the next, hence they have a tiny but finite extension (we might say that they are smeared across several locations at once). It’s exactly this miniscule extension from which all of the things of the extended, material world are ultimately constructed. In the dimensionless world, the effects of this infinitesimal extension average out to zero thanks to symmetry; in the dimensional world they average out to zero too, but in a much more complex way thanks to asymmetry and antisymmetry, and that in fact is the difference between the two domains. As ever, it’s all in the math, and correctly interpreting the math."
3425
3426    Mike Hockney
3427
3428
3429We can’t expose any more than our own actual boons and benefits, generalized for the world-scope and particularized for purpose. We can’t pour out our soul in the book exactly. There are things we can know intuitively but can’t quite put into words. Conception is not transferrable in whole broad band to empirical content. Conception comes with the warnings, potentials, apprehensions and consequences of our actions – that emphatically is not compatible with spacetime; it’s categorically a different domain and structure than spacetime. You can’t make someone smarter, and in exactly the same way you can’t clash your mind’s full contents (“loud”, “thick” full transmission.. what a holistic hint!) with another’s. This is locked by rational boundings. If you wanted to find the most divine connection you would already be pushing yourself rationally to the max, thereby provisioning and filling-in conceptual detail (by acts) to do with changing basis background-dependent reality. Reality = eternity = mind slate, let’s not forget!
3430
3431You have a lot more sinusoids than you currently consciously(!) know what to do with. What if aspects like the “loudness” is something that you missed out? The key here is to note that nothing of sinusoidal expression has us capable of feeling it. We aren’t looking to locate some kind of special feelings or bodily function, just as we’re never looking for a mystical “aura” that we can magnetically project to protect ourselves with or any of that kind of magical thinking. Trying to have an Out of Body Experience – the advice has been given by Dr. Thomas Stark that you should try to master lucid dreaming first, and perhaps get better with the liminality threshold between waking and sleep (isn’t it fascinating that we can never tell when we’re exactly going to sleep!?). There have been scientific studies in which patients reported the details in the operating theater room while their brain and heart were both scientifically “dead”. This is around 3 minutes after clinical death. Some scientists trust the patients’ disembodied recollections, especially if it matches up with what the staff in the operating theater were doing and could verify in person!
3432
3433“The evidence thus far suggests that in the first few minutes after death, consciousness is not annihilated … Whether it fades away afterwards, we do not know, but right after death, consciousness is not lost.”
3434
3435- Dr Sam Parnia, a former Southampton University research fellow now based at the State University of New York
3436
3437This is obviously talking about patients that survived the life-threatening surgery and told the researcher(s) about what they saw. Some people couldn’t remember but still reported disembodied experiences. Most people wouldn’t be able to make up these stories and wouldn’t have any cause to, however. How many times in your life has someone come up to you in a shopping mall and asked you for study help, and you thought you’d tell them you experienced remote viewing!? It emphatically doesn’t come to mind from such a percept. That’s like asking whether you’d think of a giraffe as soon as you got in a car. Shockingly, this kind of conscious rational analysis is completely ignored by scientists from the other realms of science, where you don’t need to have an opinion on such important subjects as reincarnation studies (???). Or maybe it’s not so shocking: they cannot conceptualize in the same way we are doing here (since they never made this kind of point despite having all the lead time in the world to do so, among their profession). The key thing is that conception has knowable, intelligible ranges of operation;- the more conscious of yourself and intuitive you are, the more this becomes clear to you. We can know that a soldier in a warzone might suddenly start thinking about chocolate, and we can surmise he could think about aliens or UFOs or driving a Formula 1 car, but we can know for sure he certainly won’t think about the internal core of the planet Jupiter. This is because he has no likely cause to, barring the contingent conceptual information that he’s interested in space/science (unlikely and this is given in the subjective(!) designation of a soldier) or that he visits such a percept, like if someone handed him a New Scientist magazine copy. The more you pile detail and pointed subjective analysis onto your internal mondaic infinite-sinusoidal constitution – the more able you are to range conceptions skillfully. This is the difference between a military strategist and a chemist or artist, for example. Hitler was both an artist and a political dynamite. The distinctions don’t come in scientific “containers” as in “Set Theory” but the difference is wholly conceptual and has constitution in the way we utilize our infinite range of sinusoids in concert. (Music is a concert of signals, and so is thought; the holistic right brain makes music, because these are principally the same holism). Fourier math is the principal way we facilitate the brain-to-mind interface, via Fourier transforms and inverse Fourier transforms, as explained in The God Series.
3438
3439Rather than seeing the frequencies in front of you or night vision or heat vision, what would be amazing is being able to peer into everyones’ minds and see how they actually think and conceptualize. Angels are able to do this task a lot better than us. That’s one of the gifts you get for being an angel. Like with our little scientist guy here – it’s not a particularly fun gift to have. The higher you ascend, the less you are interested in particulars of sense-appreciation and the more you range for parallels of increasing full-range sinusoidal symmetry (in infinite dimensions, not just one dimension of infinite frequency steps or flat numbers).
3440
3441
3442
3443
3444
3445"There is no fixed teaching. All I can provide is an appropriate medicine for a particular ailment."
3446
3447- Bruce Lee
3448
3449He desperately wanted people to get it and realize they should generalize knowledge intuitively and just become more intuitive like him. It didn’t occur to us that since we got here on a long Soul Line journey, and since the world isn’t empirical and based on percepts you can point to to directly influence and permanently change basis reality by percepts as if turning a big rock will change mental conceptions (direct matter influence in a universe only made of matter! Brains from matter formulas!), there can be no such thing as transmission of knowledge like that. We don’t live in that type of universe, and that false vision is the magical vision that scientists have of AI and robotics which sadly will never become real for them.
3450
3451Bruce Lee was specifically here (when we range our conception that way from the first few words) talking about freeing yourself from schematic assumptions about the bounds of what you’re doing and what you’re able to do. It hints at a veiled larger truth to life, which can be dialectically found via hard thinking work (frequency thinking; intuition; building noumenal mind’s-eye schematic maps of how the world and nations and industries affect and interpenetrate in all the issues).
3452
3453
3454
3455
3456
3457
3458In some video games you need massive amounts of experience points (exp) to level up, exploding in an exponential curve graph as you go up to the higher levels. Thinking differently (laterally) about this, you might think you could spend just the same time on thinking, reading, or other pursuits like getting fitter. What people miss out though, especially scientists, with the conception of using reward systems of a Skinner box (sugar cubes; or the analog would be any rewards you give yourself in any rudimentary reward system) is that these conceptions must fit into the overarching intuitive understanding of reality (the wavefunction and the noumenal schema of the entire world acting and convolving around us, and how we think of reality habitually which must be linked in psuedo-reliably-reconstructible ways to these phenomena and our noumenal appreciation of them). To achieve conceptual freedom means to think clearer. Clear thinking is how you escape, transcend and traverse all the other types of thoughts.
3459
3460The meaning of this book is the meaning of rational curiosity.
3461
3462Different mathematical Domains interpenetrate. Different mathematical Strategies interpenetrate (vision; bodily coordination; spatiotemporal reference spaces [they get smaller closer to doors and keyboard keys]; feeling; thinking; working versus rest; entertainment; creativity; hobbies; partying and sociability). Mental strategies, located in the eternal mental domain, integrate at crossed purposes because they are continuously active via different mathematical conditions and variables (i.e. you can see your vision and move your body and feel someone up at the same time, and taste their kisses, or you can play with their hands). This necessitates that mind interpenetrates its conception via its environment, and this can only happen on a canvas of infinite sinusoids rather than a “non-background-dependent”, strictly “flat” “empirical” universe. The second type of existence is formally not possible because you cannot generate parallellism via abstraction and indirection.
3463
3464In Bad Faith: obsession, negative empathy, sociopathy and psychopathy, forcing something, ill-defined will and intention, insufficient cause, giving undue attention, burnout, acts of boredom and vandalism, acting out of despair, despairing, whining and complaining, waiting for other people to do something, being an anomic, irrationality, pursuing things dissonantly, special pleading, begging, attempting the impossible, impossible choices, talking over someone, mysticism, gambling, “forced memes”, political campaigning with impure intentions, treating people with impure intentions, manipulating or using someone, secrecy which is obfuscation, inappropriate negative social behaviour, acts without good cause or excuse, disturbing the peace, public nuisance, noise pollution, antisocial behaviour, being too afraid to show your true self, cheating on someone, undeserved punishment, unchecked capitalism, undue attention, unrefined improper behaviour, low-effort contribution, doing a half-assed job of it, low-energy politics, stalking, being creepy, being unpleasant, giving someone a hard time, being cruel, being unkind, being unfair, being impossible, having meted out impossible challenges, expecting the world, expecting things to be given to you always, being a child, avoiding consequences, being immature, being unwieldly, showing a lack of parental responsibility, being morally bankrupt, traitorship, avoiding social responsibility.
3465
3466In Good Faith: Treating yourself well and responsibly, speaking properly and to a clear spoken standard, believing in yourself, acting prim and proper when the occasion calls for it, ,  .., .., the unadulterated, the chaste and pure, the spiritually pure, 
3467
3468Treating yourself well: (protect your comfort at all times), .. (integrating the masculine nad the fmeninee), assuming everything will go right (generally), 
3469
3470
3471If you started by speaking and identifying poorly like Eggsy initially does in Kingsman, but unconsciously over the years you were directing yourself to speak properly and elegantly and with refined finesse and clarity;- what does this say in view of uniting with your Higher Self? What does this reveal about the character of who you were in previous lives?
3472
3473
3474
3475
3476Conception is what scientists call “brain language”, the theoretical language that the mind thinks in that’s not the written, spoken Earth languages of perceptual constitution and perceptual syntax.
3477
3478Thinking around the PSR reflects generalization, in the conception.
3479
3480With abstract spiritual right brained concepts, like searching for a genesis light which created the universe, as in Sousei no Aquarion episode 2, we are called to think and search within ourselves what this could mean. This is a patently different type of contingent determinism (it's open-ended and holistic and inclusive, not coarse, left-brained and exclusive). Highly right brained spiritual content can have us hooked; it can make us feel alive, and on the edge of our seats. It can speak to the soul in ways no other content, phenomena or experiences could. The makeup to this is not in the brain activity, because it has all to do with getting to these states in patterns, forms and shapes (conceptions) via intrinsic interest (conceptual and generalizing) rather than achieving one individual particular exact brain state.
3481
3482Semantics are beautiful because they are holistic. They inclusively wrap-around the things we can define. This is because basis reality, and the right brain, are holistic and broad band and nonlocal. The left brain is the newer invention, which is about highly refined conceptual detail which now appears to us as though it's not conceptual at all. That's how good the left brain's evolution was. It managed to fool the contingent thoughts of the minds which used it, but this of course was unavoidable anyway. We have to conceptualize better, and we must use the left brain for detail and "coarse" (square-like) precision. The right brain cannot gloss over left brain signal contents all at once, in parallel, which it does not like. The left brain is the useful attempt to properly convert things into detailed, secondary percepts such as the full range of thinking about 3d objects demonstrates. We were supposed to think clearly and logically about distinct, isolated elements which is what the left brain is so good at. The left brain is analytical; the right brain holistic.
3483
3484Using the left brain is like working through a maze, whereas the right brain prefers the breeze of broad band conception. If we can instantly signify or rate something and estimate a cost/benefit factor for it, the right brain is more content. The right brain likes to analyze all at once, in parallel using intuition. A quick flick in your imagination if you tell it you want a forest scene at night, is the prime kind of example of this for our purposes here. That was a holistic thought, not a logical, rational, analytical, deterministic (as in logically determinable by mental calculations) type of thought. It wasn't deductive reasoning. It wasn't slow or by degrees of separation or indirection. It was instant, holistic, and conceptual.
3485
3486The right brain loves words. Words breathe meaning and definition into life, but in a holistic way and not a painfully slow, deductive analytical way. Words can be guessed-at and surmised just from reading them in many places and coordinating and contrasting the results. If you read enough of something you can intuitively sniff out your own guesstimation of what it generally is. The right brain proceeds by intuition and holistic information processing. Sniffing out the character of someone, or as we might say, seeing someone's soul intuitively, involves taking a few pieces of information about them and forming a holistic picture or conception of what they are likely to be doing; how they are likely to behave; the kinds of setting and scenario they surround themselves in; the kinds of conversations, interactions they would have with people and their general rationality and their general temperament. Images like these are holistic images of the soul which people use when they picture (conceptualize!) their family and friends unconsciously. It's through the "little voice in your head" that you can talk to yourself, and this is a holistic, broad-band communication which comes, from a highly left-brained analysis, seemingly from nowhere. Of course, the self is always in the self, and you can imagine a picture of your own face in a top corner of your visual periphery in your mind's eye where you would appear to talk to yourself. This is holism, and the right brain; rather than the left brain world of spatiotemporal coordination, spatial and logical frames of reference, 3d coordinates, clarity and visceral qualia the likes that might be experienced on a Viking battlefield after the fact on a cold morning. The left brain likes sense details because they are definite and clear and sharp and analytically compatible with what it is characteristically doing. The right brain loves holistic broad band conception where the details are filled in from the outside in. The left brain fills and works conceptually from the detail outwards. The left brain is in the business of definites, and the right brain is in the business of conceptual containers and conceptual wrapping. The left brain is "convex" while the right brain is "concave".
3487
3488
3489
3490Conceptually we can activate different parts of both hemispheres of the brain (unconsciously until we glimpse the patterns and how they interoperate) to get the right where-mix of concavity and convexity that we need. As above, so below. As you can do glass blowing and 3d art using a mental blackboard to conceptualize the shaping that you want (try Sculptris or Moment of Inspiration), you must thereby be doing it in your mind conceptually, for it ever to appear in front of you in the realm of percepts. Crafting and shaping things freely means that you are mathematically understanding the surface-shaping math which the computers know in 3d analysis in game physics engines and in medical voxel analysis applications. (Voxels are simply 3d pixels and unlike in Minecraft they can be as small as possible).
3491
3492
3493
3494"This reminds me of one of my favorite memories from Soul Blazer; one man in the first town owns a goat. He lost his wife, but if you speak to the goat, it turns out that the goat was the man's wife in her previous life."
3495
3496    - Youtube commenter
3497
3498I was wondering why that memory stuck out (and I couldn't reconstruct it), even though this was from my childhood. It turns out that this emotionally hit me hard, and it showed me that everything can always be restored, if even 90%. We are still here. You are immortal.
3499
3500Restoration can be simply a dialectical path (a sinusoidal expression, extension, or routing).
3501
3502
3503
3504
3505If we said the Earth's surface evolved or devolved, we'd have to be able to fit this into a conception. That's exactly because of how conceptualization works. Conceptualization is able to freely stretch over a given conceptual wrapping area of the world (any phenomena, which doubles-up as any phenomenally-appearing frequency wave pattern and the noumenal modellings behind such phenomenal boosts and shifts) and that's exactly what our chief concepts are occupied with. For angels, the Earth is something they can look over to conceptualize however they want; their mind's eye gives them the conceptual ability to think of the planet's appearance in phenomena as a kind of keymap for how to remember or link up different things about planetary noumena. Think of the memory room idea where you associate different objects in a room with different things. Intuition and the broad band soul contents are the quintessential and foundational way by which we visit the things we want to find. This is a bit of a struggle to wrap your head around, but consider that the things we want to reach most (the sort of good, major half of the equation so to speak) are always going to be found within us, not outwith us. This is infact the reason for all imagination, Active Imagination, deep considered introverted thinking, and all philosophy. In your mind's eye you can travel conceptually anywhere (we are not talking about embodied travel or anything necessarily to do with a body even). The higher mind has access simply to whatever it wants via its mind's eye, whenever it has become conscious. The ways we orient ourselves (our percepts and perceptual dialectics!) were always fundamentally going to be located associationally fastest, and visited via frequency/mind with no obstruction. This is more akin to how a god thinks, although gods reflexively reason at much higher rates and capacities expending much less mental roundabout trips. Animals must use spacetime to coordinate their thoughts, and so must the vast majority of humans. Spacetime pivoting, with spacetime-based events and even spacetime-based dating, is one principal route to extension of mind in the sense of locating a definitive useful thinking strand. Frequency thinking, using intuition or using conscious thought, is exactly what sidesteps and short-circuits this process (here is where we achieve philosophy, lateral thinking, unusual solutions, mystical intuitions, spiritual or intuitive encouragement, meaning, intuitive glimpses of clarity). It's exactly from this mechanism that percepts can never directly inform mind (because if they did sometimes, then definitionally there must be a sufficient reason why they can sometimes and can't at other times!). Percepts can thus never hint closely at what we should do. Scientists are looking for the percept-on-percept interactions which generate mind and thought, but this can't ever be demonstrated since conceptual mind operates indirectly via its frequency knowledge, which must happen independently of any perceptual interactions (since we can always choose what to do, how to think, whether to intuit, remember, speak, and so on). If there was an empirical test to prove undoubtedly this kind of nature, then we would have to demonstrate that intuition, choice, or something of the frequency domain can consistently be selected - the problem here is, that any demonstration would either have scientists thinking "oh, but all this is only an abstraction of something else greater", or it would be an illegal or unethical experiment. One interesting type of demonstration is those of "The Iceman", Wim Hof, who has had a documentary made about how he can submerge himself in ice-cold water, swimming in lakes and holding his breath underwater for long periods of time. He says he can control his immune system to some degree. For Wim Hof, in this particular scenario of ice-cold water, there are no obvious "phony" elements like an intrinsic motivation to explain why his mind would be doing it. But as ever, scientists simply can't think in wrap-around, right brain intuitive terms, to a suitable degree. Scientists aren't explaining, they are reporting.
3506
3507
3508
3509Hearing your neighbour in the garden is a percept. It prompts you. The body can be awoken by sounds, and this is a special case we might say where percepts are permitted to give a jumpstart (as in jumpstarting a car) because of the special case of unconsciousness needing to arise to consciousness; as if it suddenly primordially "remembers". If you were a plant, don't forget, you wouldn't have this reaction and so we can safely say that it's not a universal, absolute necessary type of mechanism.
3510
3511What happens in the mental space of an eternal monad here is that the percept is impressioned upon the mind space mathematically. (That's how it must be for a plant soul that's always awake). What happens here is that the mind, always being active, "sees" in the most unconscious sense this mathematical shape. The shape, as we will know from personally passing leaves and stones along our fingers as children, informs the senses but it does not dictate what happens. You don't press a snail into your hand as a child and have the snail tell you what to do. That would be definitionally impossible, because as per percepts in themselves (sensation space in broad band), you can't actually conceptually describe what would happen in conceptual space via percept-space. That's exactly it. That's why gods can't talk to us (because we are the snails here!) and that's why concept definitionally must precede all percepts in all circumstances whatsoever. A percept doesn't have divine rights to influence anything. But what a percept must do, definitionally, is it must have the exact proper analytical feedback that we would analytically expect from such a percept. Percepts must have this property and there is no escaping it at all (not under any circumstances). This is exactly why pain behaves the way in our bodies that pain always does. There are different types of pain for the skin and bone. Your reaction to pain ("sheer" pain of the shallower type feels like a searing, pinching itch) is perceptual and not psychological, rational or mental. It's not conceptual pain - but - ahh - we make decisions based on physical pain; so then it is after all conceptual, since it gets invited into our conception and our grand conception of the evaluation of who and what we are, while we're in pain (or discomfort). Pain and discomfort neither work on purely a pure perceptual or pure conceptual basis, since this is the meeting point. Mental health is purely based around conception and conceptualization - the environment habitually factors into grand conception (how you are doing and how other people are conceptualized as behaving towards you yourself).
3512
3513
3514
3515What would happen if you could easily meet highly intuitive souls while growing up (at this present stage)? You wouldn't be "pure" enough to individuate in the way that's required (radical individuation). There is a reason for everything that the angels have coordinated.
3516
3517
3518
3519Pain and discomfort work by setting fire to our clarity of thought, which is why organisms evolved to avoid pain. Angels don't need pain because they don't need that evolutionary tree. Humans still do, because we aren't sufficiently conscious;- this is a conceptual difference, as in, it will be gone as the rest of the conception is complete;- when we have ascended we won't be possibly be able to stub our toes or cut our fingers or trip and fall while walking, and that conceptually, fully "neatly", must come with the conscious control over matter's pain fire. The two aspects either both come together or they don’t come at all.
3520
3521
3522
3523As we rework our concepts into tighter more precise definitions (via language and coordinated, higher Illuminated cooperation) we will be able to say clearer things about contextual conceptualization. We'll be more conscious. We won't be left talking about pain versus angelhood; we would be able to navigate closer within the circle to our target (which hasn't been provided, which means we can't talk about it in any more specific terms).
3524
3525
3526
3527
3528
3529
3530What does your mind exist for? What do you exist for? In the spiritual contingent sense, we don't exist to stand around idling by. We don't exist either to occupy ourselves with entertainment only, or to "relax" and achieve absolutely zero maximization. This is the type of conclusion that you eventually make if you have zeroed out the other paths for yourself. Things either are conceptually worth chasing (your mind isn't being tricked but you choose it) or they have no more utility to you and this is unconsciously even graspable. It's via the dialectic that we free ourselves thoroughly from the chains of the desires and the irrational lower self. You don't want to be in a relationship with people who don't fulfil you, and you don't want sex with people who don't interest you and whom you couldn't be yourself with. Once you maximally express yourself and maximally define your desires' conceptual shapes (which requires Earth like individuation under Earth like contexts) you have dialectically "resolved" this for yourself. It becomes. It becomes baked into your active current conceptualization (not just your conception) of mind. The process is buried within the process now. Life typically doesn't appear to you like it used to, as you grow older - but you can synthesize in this sense and reclaim the wonder from your childhood! - You can feel an amazing wonder, mystique and elation because you can do the things which make you thoroughly alive.
3531
3532
3533
3534The abstract conceptual goal we live for is obviously the grand synthesis of what makes us most conscious; what makes us pour our soul out in our highest expression which makes us most proud; what definitionally skirts the borders around the best and brightest segments of life. Do you have to achieve to be wholly satisfied? You will certainly be configured better if you can bring yourself authentic elation; authentic emotion; authentic heightened rationality. Ask your inner angel. Consult your Higher Self. Have you had a transcendental dream lately? If not, why not? What are you going to do to make it happen? Who and what circumstances will you have to dialectically meet?
3535
3536
3537
3538A "blood curdling" event was seen with Alma Deutscher. It might send shivers down your spine. In one video documentary, she is shown to be playing piano to herself at 6 years old - while, as her father explains as we watch the old video recording of her - she is apparently switching to an alternate persona ("the teacher") who instructs the inner child how to better play the piano. This is the height of dialectical bicamerality expressed by the unconscious Higher Self of this individual. The Higher Self typically appears to us as an enlivened, bold anima/animus figure of towering spirit and strength (watch episode 2 of Sousei no Aquarion for a brilliantly appropriate mythos semantic example) at some stage in our young adult life; the Higher Self sits at the top and has persons with spacetime domain knowledge clean up after it; but it needs integrating abreast with the rest of the psyche as we grow. This is a 6 year old child wielding the power of a highly capable unconscious mind.
3539
3540
3541
3542Alma Deutscher was definitely a music instructor (or more) in a past life. She at 6 years old is doing something far more than being a piano teacher; she is unconsciously asserting bicamerally via her right brain Higher Self the means to manipulate the left brain (and her father by giving commands). Not only does this mean her soul chose to reincarnate into a stable family, but her soul correctly identified and connected with the parent souls to make sure that this was a selection where she could be the dominant genius child. This means either her soul has likely done something similar in the previous reincarnation processes, or it was accidental or coincidental that these parents would be so accommodating for her strange behaviours, and they were just a general rough best-fit by other indexes (sinusoids). (The reincarnating soul would have to be sure to pick rational parents, and not sensory types). The dominance of the unconscious Higher Self is uncanny. Rationality and rational conception is uncanny by definition.
3543
3544
3545
3546This is Alma Deutscher's mother talking about the records that she wrote, because of the fanciful vivid imagination and brilliant synesthesia her daughter had:
3547
3548"I almost remember the time -- she was just beginning to understand about death and you know - there was a lot of talk in here about the underworld - because she understood death as the underworld. There's a wonderful bit about Elizabeth Schwartzkopf who she knew as dead, and she devised this idea that you could get a ticket, back from the underworld, to come back to life again. You know, as if the imagination can take you there! And can take you out of it as well! Can.. can get you out of it."
3549
3550This is what the writing says:
3551
3552"Elizabeth Schwartkopf lives in the dying-place (the Underworld). She has a ticket to come back here again. And if the ticket says no then you don't come back again. And if it says yes then you do come back again. You don't have to, but you can."
3553
3554It's highly unusual for a child to originate its own ideas about people, circumstances, and mechanisms. It's incredibly incredibly rare for an embodied soul to have its own particular opinion on death before 10 years old, which it arrived at all by itself, or the operation of its Higher Self.
3555
3556In the future, all our children will be gifted, and we can live more perfect lives via collectively forced supersymmetry. The key thing is working on our individuation which means, ultimately, becoming conscious. It would be great if we could chiefly become conscious of all the different inroads that the principal types of consciousness-domains could open up for us (consciousness-developing strategies).
3557
3558
3559
3560
3561No coincidences exist. There are conceptual understandings, but some coincidences present worse cost/benefit ratios than others. Consciousness means, as an angel would tell you, rejecting all the minimal paths (minimization) and selecting all the maximal paths (maxmization).
3562
3563What is substance abuse? Substance abuse maximizes the pleasure and draws the minimal distance between the happy thoughts and the means to get to them. Substance abuse also however makes a person more able to have the thoughts that are extensional to a better self; i.e. the substance abuse is not divorced from the conceptual personhood that it enriches. Substance abuse isn't "scientific", because it involves the whole broad band soul (just as people can often note that doctors push pills and can't see that tasty nutritious food, a healthy state of mind and healthy social and sexual circumstances make someone's life conceptually better).
3564
3565When you look at certain things, like a religious piece of jewellery, your unconscious is prompted with unconscious bubble-up conceptions starting from distinct shape (holistic image with broad band detail, just like a TV signal never comes serially only) and it’s from here that meaning becomes emblazoned into the receiving “arms” of conception. We start imagining (creating) meaning, which is wholly conceptual and entirely holistic. (Did you see what I achieved accidentally there? The two statements are commensurate).
3566
3567
3568
3569
3570"The hard swallow built into science is this business about the Big Bang. Now let’s give this a little attention here. This is the notion that the universe, for no reason, sprang from nothing in a single instant. Well, now before we dissect this, notice that this is the limit test for credulity. Whether you believe this or not, notice that it is not possible to conceive of something more unlikely or less likely to be believed. I defy anyone. It’s just the limit case for unlikelihood that the universe would spring from nothing in a single instant for no reason. If you believe that, my family has a bridge across the Hudson River that we’ll give you a lease option for five dollars. It makes no sense. It is in fact no different from saying ‘and God said let there be light.’ What these philosophers of science are saying is give us one free miracle and we will roll from that point forward from the birth of time to the crack of doom. Just one free miracle and then it will all unravel according to natural law and these bizarre equations that nobody can understand but which are so holy in this enterprise. "
3571
3572    Terence Mckenna
3573
3574The difference is the degree of conceptualization. Consider how an animal thinks of what the locus of unlikelihood is; or the conceptual spectrum of unlikelihood. Unlikelihood definitionally doesn't exist in predominant capacity within absolute sinusoidal mathematics. It can't get promoted insufficiently. What we do have is absolute footing to reason about absolute necessity and contingent preferability & advisability.
3575
3576"Well I say then, if science gets one free miracle then everybody gets one free miracle. I perceive that it is true when you build these large scale cosmogonic theories that you have to have kind of an umbilical cord to start from that is different from all other points in the system. "
3577
3578    Terence Mckenna
3579
3580Reasoning can start from anywhere via percept (experiences), phenomena (world events) or concept (conscious studied thought). Reasoning is often unconscious among modern humans, in the sense that the major chunk of our reasoning is not the type which is expressed by spoken language. Unconscious reasoning of different souls can be differently elevated.
3581
3582"So if we have to have a singularity in our modeling of what reality is, let’s make it as modest and as non-unlikely a singularity as possible. The singularity that arises for no reason in absolutely empty space instantly is the least likely of all singularities. "
3583
3584    Terence Mckenna
3585
3586
3587
3588
3589Unconsciously we may be reminded, as we’re doing something, that we can actually resolve the name of the thing we’re using. Mind has arrived at a particular unconscious conceptual generalized methodology of looking up long-term memory(!) as a fallback process for trying to resolve the name of something which seems important to the conscious mind in some capacity. (Note that this is therefore a functionality relating to dream anchors and achieving lucidity in dreams). This long-term consultation is being done to literally dialectically derive (exhaustively) a solution without even ever looking at the spatiotemporal domain for a confirmation of an answer – something scientists could never do, as they only trust their senses and dictionaries and wouldn’t dare trust their intuition to zero in on something by itself. God souls must be doing this (exhausting even long term memory from many years back) in order to literally self-derive, dialectically, any last possible recombinant resolution. We resolve dialectical threads strictly within the monad in this unconscious strategy. It keeps going and bringing in more results via proceeding wavefunction collapses if the conceptual disposition is open. Gods do this blazingly fast, having all the mental acuity (developed unconscious conceptions and generalizations). Gods have eclipsed spatiotemporal existence entirely.
3590
3591
3592“Little resolvables”; little helpers. The unconscious mind, from the point of view of the conscious, can be seen akin to magic fairies in this view. There can be an archetypal angel and devil on your shoulder (phoster and archon); or there’s the conception of the unconscious and subconscious bubbling up in terms of primordial, task-based sense (bicameral relationship where it does the tasks for “you” where “you” is the seat of consciousness). In fact, “you” is your entire mind, conscious and unconscious, conception all around. Conception must involve the expanding and contracting which allows refocus of mathematical information in particular overarching ways (we don’t receive all of the visual percepts in front of our eyes, but we control how our mind shifts into pure thought versus pure perception, i.e. the concept of how that works).
3593
3594Little hints about micro optimization. What you could do in a different order; how to settle this or that. This must be the unconscious mind finding real general conceptual solutions now, but of course this is a far cry from the generalmost solutions that an angel has baked into its broad phase conceptualization. That is how we can tell the difference in soul.
3595
3596How do we normally tell the difference in soul? Why can we, in the way that scientists will never acknowledge? We take the percepts from people (general markers and indexes of intelligence) and we run them in our conceptual simulator which can give us indicators of how intelligent people are. Different information going into this black box will trigger different flags for us. The people we can’t figure out are the most fascinating to us and they break our black box for testing people. This is what happens when you find an extremely emotionally healthy, extremely rewarding connection with someone despite your intensity.
3597
3598
3599Finally, it’s consciousness that we know we know the new spelling of a word, that allows us to collapse the wavefunction on something that depended on this (removing a note to find and replace a personal spelling mistake pattern).
3600
3601
3602For smooth interoperability reasons (which has “recursion” implications when thought is used for building other thought within a wavefunction collapse), you need a wavefunction with prominent particulars in none of the particular spaces and in all of the universal spaces where they are appliccable or preferable. Otherwise you will throw up inaccuracies in your thinking. This is why sentimentality is evolutionarily to be stripped out. Angels know these sorts of stories. We then still have full access to the “clean things”: archetypes, conception, consciousness, elation, the assumption that all will go well for us.
3603
3604Ontological form is provisioned and everything else provisioned (thoughts) must conform to it. Another way of saying this without pretending thoughts must have agency and acting capacity (choice) is simply to say that thoughts can’t be defined outwith their eternal sinusoidal range of capacity. This is then cross-validated and confirmed as we realize that thoughts are selections across, among and through sinusoids. Sinusoids are the background for the “lines of code” that thoughts comprise. Imagine sinusoids as a backdrop (like a grey square) with the squiggles being drawn over the full range of numbers. Mind paints its own canvas conceptually like that. It must do, and it has to. The difference here is that you have just created a thought which is, in itself, distinct and binding in a highly particular way (i.e. without the conceptual construct of motion and whatever is divorced from the particulars themselves in that thought). The principal, chief and only way we get around one thought being the description of existence is by dialectically surrounding and elevating our basis conception (not the individual distinct thought) with other, supporting thoughts. (Just like supporting characters in hero movies, which are dialectical).
3605
3606
3607
3608If we include Hegel’s picture-thinking as percepts – we either repetitively stay stuck with the unconscious images presented to us about others (bad and good) in a kind of microscale reincarnational hell of ourselves, or we can figure out a way to become conscious and lift our present rate of actualization to one of proper benefit. To do that, you need to be what’s called “self-actualizing”. Self-actualizing people make tough decisions, “lead their own lives”, they’re assertive and they make sure things go right for themselves with a care and attention; and they then go onto developing their psychogical and spiritual development, and particularly self-actualizing people are extremely pointed in this discipline; they are capable and expert and knowledgeable on it. To actualize would be to make something real and turn some potential into actuality and effects and results;- the more abstract and ambitious you go, the more difficult it is to pull this down on the world and crank out the results you want. Self-actualization is easy for simpler conceptual tasks, but harder for highly conceptual tasks.
3609
3610The secret to editing is that you reread to reconceptualize your sentences, prompting your unconscious to suggest to you better-fit words (you “tease” it with incomplete knowledge) and reformed phrasings. Your unconscious eventually even starts to blank out words with replacement words stopping your conscious left-brained mind from thinking in the usual strictly perceptive way that it does (this is how we get visual blind spots and it’s related to how we skip over one word while writing). You of course are supposed to change the word suggested with the tighter, more intuitive fit as soon as your unconscious first suggests it (this appears as soon as you try to think about rephrasing a sentence you wrote). The maximization principle is alive, and it’s unconscious, and it’s “bicameral”. The right brain has started suggesting from its wonderfully fluffy selection of vocabulary-box words; the words that it fetishizes over because of their sinusoidal “colourful”, “beauty”, “worldlike”, synesthesia-producing, interlinkage properties (which, being conceptual, are holistic). The right brain is the ancient brain and the left brain is the modern brain. The soul resides in the right brain (the nonlocal frequency brain) and is expressible more distinctly and precisely by the left brain. Watch again the Alma Deutscher “blood curdling” documentary-part where “the teacher” is instructing the child at 6 years old. It’s as if a guardian angel or spiritual guide is accompanying her. It’s her Higher Self.
3611
3612Editing reflects the principle of energy minimization. People range their textual quotes over energic principles of least generalized (parallellized) energy distribution to achieve an analytical (mathematical) outcome. A book can only be arranged, organized and coordinated in view of a general mass conceptually shifting principle (conception) that facilitates for multimensional/multispoked contingent goals, like achieving the completion and delivery within a short timespan. All is inter-related. Nothing is strictly ontologically “flat”, “abstract”, non-background-dependent (as empiricism claims, with its “indeterminate”, “indeterminable” “random” dogma surrounding the ontological universal wavefunction collapse). All wavefunction collapse is strictly analytical.
3613
3614In some stories trees can talk. This would be a projection of the right brain’s holism, as if moaning or murmuring (ancient, slow expression) is the opposition to zip-speedy, fancy-of-flight technology of leftbrain symbolic analogs. Unsurprisingly, the narrative placement here or the scoping placement is on “nature” (in motif and symbolism terms), which reflects holism. We might imagine here some noises of some birds chirping aggressively in a lush rainforest environment, full of tropical ranges of trees and bushes with fanning bright green leaves, blowing in the wind peacefully. Note how dreamlike this all sounds. It’s as if we are lucid dreaming right now, consciously walking through the right brain’s dream capabilities. That’s because the mathematics we are using is directly analogous i.e. it comes in the same extension and form as we would weave it when we dream. It’s like we are pulling silver silk thread all over this paragraph right now. This is holism and the right brain. This is its language; its interest; its passion being expressed. The right brain creates music in Particular and it “dances” to music (your body is possessed by your right brain!).
3615
3616Right brain: imagining in your mind’s eye the whole planet right now; all the activity at once. This is a conceptual, broad-band, holistic image.
3617
3618Left brain: imagine the structure of a pylon or the Arc de Triomphe in your mind’s eye once you’ve seen it.
3619
3620Both hemispheres: imagine you’re flying along the planet’s surface in your mind’s eye, taking in the details of city lights at night time, and noting the “feel” of a host nation.
3621
3622
3623
3624
3625
3626
3627You should note that the percepts of the Alma Deutscher documentary/interviews have prompted to influence the style of right brained writing in various places (by now) in this book, via my soul’s understanding of these things: my own inner child; my sense of childhood wonder; my vivid imagination; the rest of my soul. I am using sleep deprivation and this highly vivid soundtrack music from the different stories I mentioned throughout.
3628
3629This book is entirely made of black and white text to an empiricist. When I think of what I wrote about Code Geass, I’m perceiving and conceiving colours in the text; conceptual imagery in my mind’s eye (scenes from the show flashing by) and schematic, rational conceptual constructs of the psychological and rational contents I’m freely Actively Imagining. In Harry Potter there was a magic map showing the moving footsteps of everyone in the school (even the invisibly cloaked). The cloak, the object surrounding visibility, was a Grail Object. Read that in the context of this entire paragraph again – you couldn’t make it up! We are engaging supersymmetry. That’s what rationalistic philosophy is in the business of. Supersymmetry is the contingent “scratch buffer” of the mind, and it shifts with conception. It’s the “show your [math] work” work that we can never show to an empiricist. An empiricist would want to make sense of the sentence in non-background-dependency terms (no assumed context; “laziness” of conception), but obviously in any nonfiction book, a mind always comes over the content.
3630
3631Imagine you have spun a silver spider web over infinite sinusoidal dimensions – and it twitches and kinks to external probing, but then along comes the scientists and they want to photograph it in infinite dimensions with their one-dimensional camera. They can only get a slice, and it’s constantly moving so they can’t get a clear picture. They decide to call it a day, pack up their picnic lunch, get off the red polkadot tablecloth they were sitting on across the fresh green summer grass, and go back home. The spider web maintains all its structural integrity (you should be able to conceptually “feel” it like woven steel electric fence wires being taught/pulled tight), and the only place it’s not holding its integrity is in the particular way it’s being “visited” (photographed in this case). Mind and sinusoids have analytical constitution (all that there possibly is and can be); and it’s only when we bring all this to the spacetime domain of matter that certain frequencies can get in and others can’t; it’s only in spacetime that certain properties arise like the consistency of matter along time (which is eternal state; eternal expression of other actual mental existences; other minds; which cannot go anywhere).
3632
3633The principal reason why existence operates in a field of parallel, mass mind / minds en masse, is this: with singular minds, we could not construct conceptually an entire such field of our own; we have to share it with everyone else because there is principally nothing we can do or get with having an entire universe to ourselves (what would we produce or express?) - as soon as you’d express all your full analytical range of possible patterns, you would come out with nothing to interactively do because the principal goal and the ontological form of life is to “discuss” the something (the special pleading) which is all that we really actually can possess (and it is a social, shared reflective conceptual nature). Mind literally could not exist without other minds! Imagine that. Somehow there is actually a limit on the number of minds, which may even now sound confusing! But it had to stop somewhere. It turns out that commensurate exactly with this is the limit on the number of sinusoids, and that’s because these two come with one another with the conception. Something is “happening” that makes this the case. Of course, as always, the “answer” (resolution) lies with our own broken subjectivity which needs to be reunited with proper god-status sinusoidal supersymmetry. It’s our own conception that fills in the gaps wrong (do you remember we talked about the broad band being conception?).
3634
3635A type of reality with totally separate universes for each monad would result in nothing interesting (which we could say is perhaps the next dialectical thought of the PSR). This then resolves to the obvious conclusion that we would need to have a shared domain to facilitate meaningful expression. (Meaningful expression is given by the wavefunction collapse; the competition for something that is actualized in view of all minds – “Witness this!”). So, minds in this sense can be considered now to have “separate independent existence”; the souls have all got their own “houses”;- and then they can also use a shared mental blackboard to broadcast all their favourite thoughts onto. But most souls aren’t in embodied life yet, and that’s also part of the Sacred Cause of all embodied life (and here is even a kind of defensive hyper conscious reflex against jealousy and the Shadow, because these souls don’t even have lives to be jealous of).
3636
3637You definitionally cannot express anything without other monads, because to express under the aspect of eternity would also mean to discuss under the aspect of eternity. And that requires individuation capabilities. This is all since you cannot express something which has no second possible expression (a dialectical antithesis). Doesn’t this mean that the dialectic is literally what we live for and how we live, in a strictly informational and transactional sense? Is there any possible hard ontological act, in other words, which is not dialectical? Can we act without triggering the dialectic? What if art is a dialectic with the self and the soul contents? (But then there is the frequency domain a la the paranormal). The problem being posed here is the problem of conceptual ranging, which feels out its scopes of distance (indirection; degrees of separation) in order to inform its conceptual style and look’n’feel. This is to say that all we can do ultimately is conceptualize and we cannot escape conceptualization (we cannot declare an absolute particular which stands fully always present to us or stands fully outside of reality). If we say that the dialectic doesn’t exist, then we are simply ranging something else; some other figurative mathematical goo over the surface of it which is our actual new conceptualization. Conceptualization can never just stand to one side. It is what we do. It is the nonlocal, frequency, sinusoidal style and taste of what we do.
3638
3639If you had a bit of a problem with the “feelers” analog, try this; imagine right now that infinitely long lines come out of your body in all “minute” possible directions in a spherical shape. Now imagine that these lines are the dimensions (sinusoids) by which you can inherently innately “command” (shape; compose) your thoughts (or your “being”) at all possible times. This is an alternative conception of mind to the usual The God Series reading. Of course, if we try to “feel” sinusoids as if this is a mystical experience, it won’t do anything at all! And analytically this provides consciousness of the insight but (dialectically) no more.
3640
3641The dialectic, as a useful concept, is more about abstraction of the dialectical ends and leaves than it is about trying to identify a “strict hard ontological thought which is not dialectical”. You know where the focus should be (towards the outsides; the rims of the scope of definition) when selecting thoughts. We aim to consistently sort of never actually touch anything or penetrate too deeply into any one thing in particular, while teasingly straddling the line between all things, snaking about. Tantric sex with reality! Oh my. Note that the possibilities of thought are endless.
3642
3643
3644The INTP mind is the “trial by fire” or “trial and error” methodology. It learns how to do things like reread its sentences and explain to itself thoroughly and explicitly (unconsciously) structural assurances like how the qualifiers on sentences we write structurally map back to macroscale sentence-structure (conceptual cross-validation; supersymmetry and mirroring and sinusoidal “fuzzy” confirmation). INTP thinking is the monumental “soul exp points” investment venture. It’s the true fountain of life that extroverts passed by and didn’t see in its sanct little religious grotto to the side of the main pathway. (The right brain loves holistic images. You can see that we are crafting holistic compossibility-driven qualifiers when we create these sentences. That’s what the unconscious can do, and it can definitionally, necessarily, only do this Incrementally when the requisite percepts, the contents and words, have been provided; Grand Leap holism is done without assuming particular context at the wider outermore reaches of mind/conception).
3645
3646Grand Leap creativity = thesis
3647
3648Incremental creativity = antithesis and synthesis (they both come together in each step)
3649
3650Dreams are Grand Leap creativity exactly because we have next-to-no percepts to go on initially! The resultant reformulations in the eternal frequency domain are incremental. The incremental pattern (the Selector Function which is conceptual and gets refined by your waking life’s skill sets) provides the dream plot, setting, scenario and developments. (It is “informed”, definitionally, by the committed unconscious understandables from how you process mythos structures). How does reading about dreams make you dream a little more often and more vividly? - Because it’s informing on how to dream! There is no other possible explanation. We already knew that percepts meant something, because existence can’t be “informed” without percepts.
3651
3652We always “reboot” our dreams with our soul contents (conception and conceptualization), and then the dream-percepts just start to appear (because we can never start from true zero and nonthought). The frequency domain, viewed from the perspective of waking life being normal, allows us increased expressive dimensionality that we can become sentient of in sense, touch, conceptual awareness. The dialectical opposition between sleeping/waking is of course something that furthers the soul thus, unconsciously dipping its dialectical process into further dialectical straits between frequency-frequency dream scenarios (dream functions) and waking spatiotemporal “tasks”. (Not that any of this would make sense to modern mainstream society’s definitions and placement of waking and sleeping; they have no reference frame for what we are talking about here).
3653
3654You have to be incredibly openminded to think in terms unbounded by common schema. Academics are typically very annoying in the strait-jacket, conformist ways their left brains operate. Just read their cryptic convoluted (meaning, bloated) language in their whitepapers. It’s like they’ve evolved too fast or too immaturely. Your right brain is looking down on this aspect of the left brain, not simply the left brain’s mental acuity, precision and granular definition abilities in themselves. The right brain doesn’t “hate on” needlessly and we wouldn’t expect this from a rational universe. The “individuated” right brain plays well with others!
3655
3656All creativity is dialectical, but the degree of conceptual purity is what allows us to use Grand Leap creativity (and indeed as in Descartes’ mind-body dualism problem, there must be one prime substance in all cases not two indivisible ones). When you’ve written a book you can think about the contents in different ways, afforded by the percepts they now dialectically generate as you visit over them with your absolutely-grounded expressions of eternal monadic math find them.
3657
3658The right brain (holism) is what rearranges sentences while editing something you loved to write. It “prefers” easier reads of sentences; and the “mistakes” (think back to the Daniel Tammet video with the Pi terrain analog) are the particularities which need ironing out.
3659
3660
3661
3662
3663
3664
3665Why are sense-impressions a way to associatively select the past experiences we tied them to? Because this was, to begin with, a form of selection and conceptualization.
3666
3667Hypnagogia can let you play with incredibly crisp, clear colours in your mind’s eye; hypnagogic imagery can also take the form of what perceives like video clips, which are then interleaved faster than you can get bored of them; they can come in very quick succession (different people doing things in front of you) and these are richly vibrantly crisply detailed. There’s nothing quite like hypnagogia as an experience.
3668
3669We can probably run the speculation that a lot of interesting mental activity contributes to vividly detailed hypnagogia (or it may simply be sleep deprivation). Dialectically, the question comes up now, bubbling up from the unconscious – if you weren’t willing to “play with” your cognition-state - i.e. stop thinking in some days - then how could you figure out this for sure; and isn’t it worth more than a few days of thought to test this assumption? Amazingly here, we seem to have quoted the right brain’s suggestion and then had the left brain step in (“- i.e. stop thinking in some days - ”) to rationalize and justify and coordinate or explain what the right brain has just proposed. Intuitions come in broad band all at once, and they carry the holistic conception of the meaning. It’s the left brain’s job to dialectically [at large; not in discrete/slice/finite but in continuous/long/extended mode] individuate the right brain’s holistic concepts and formulate revisions to them.
3670
3671The left brain engages in spacetime and the right brain gives us holistic intuition patterns prized from queries and tasks. The left brain coordinates the local spatiotemporal space but also the abstract logical analytical thinking space of mind, and the right brain is in the business of posing the complementary role to specialization, particularization, precision, the scalpel; namely, holism, emotion, will, desire, intuition, drama, purpose, spirituality, and the rest.
3672
3673We have to sacrifice some threads of the wavefunction collapse in favour of other things. Note that all recorded reclaimed reconstructions of the world of pure thought that we bring back with us, to give names to, are actually descriptions of the structure itself of thought; the forms of conception put in mythos terms almost. We call it logos (descriptive conceptual language written about thought); and then there is pure thought (actual active executing mind). The former is a record keeping extensional limb of mind (which is what Mike Hockney said first) and the latter is the means to coordinate it all (by definition). Mathematically, one mathematical shape of interaction (not really a “space” since spaces don’t get operated on by “infinite-dimensional” math) conceptually encapsulates the other, and that’s how we get extensional mathematical interaction. The concepts can be remixed into bigger conceptions even though originally you might have grew these dialectical leaves off off different sinusoidal base trees. The simple proof of this, if you’ll join me for a simple thought [I just slept on it] is how you are able to pick and add-to-the-box from the vast range of your own thoughts-that-you-get-from-considering-phenomena-or-noumena;- you simply take or produce one formulation from one domain of life (like it could be effectively turned out to be “encoded” in a memory) and this new thought, in you, is then rolled out to be reintegrated/refactored into a new piece of knowledge. That is enough to rationally prove or demonstrate what we are talking about here. Note that this works because the strictly provisional, given, working, operational concept of “you” is actually entirely contingent, provisional, in-situ and advisory, at the point of conception (at the style of conception) as that’s how mind works and not otherwise (never otherwise). In other words, subjectivity makes subjectivity in the point or the place or the style that it happens! As we might expect;- by the simple translational transactional nature of the subjectivity (the conception and the conceptual range which is spread over conceptual forms which we are given to take as the source of some event or process; the linkage) is it that subjectivity cannot ever be pinned down or defined in one consistent, consistently-reliably-consistent form. That’s exactly because conception is conception and it’s always irreducible to that (via the “hall of mirrors” properties of godlike supersymmetry of the monad) and cannot categorically be assumed to hold form as anything else. Conception is exactly that which must be permissibly free (of all contingency and of/across all contingent terms). So therefore – it never actually strictly “takes shape” (i.e. the right brain here is meaning;- in particular in permanence of ontological form) because it’s contingent form – and so, by the time we express something new with it, conception simply “contingently is” that new contingent thought, and nothing else of the sort that could be categorically traced, compared or differently-traced with the previous thought of the mind. Content of mind (previous thoughts) can only appear to us (to thought) as new content. It categorically can’t be compared as an ontological existent by an ontological existent which now replaces it in eternity’s actual ontological strict expressional “template” or “mould” or “place” or “station”.
3674
3675It’s supersymmetry fundamentally that allows us to have highly parallel thoughts. Consider how we can pull and grab words off the tree of knowledge/life. This is because of supersymmetrical sionusoidal mirroring; nothing else. There is no other “empiricist” source of evidence to look for or to find. Thought, conception, is irreducible in all but the face of the Selector Function. The Selector Function simply is god in the sense of its capacity to create.
3676
3677
3678What is the chief difference between/among human concepts such as the connection to one’s family? There aren’t any such chief patterns and contingent forms which can belong ontologically, categorically, to all contingent forms! The soul can never “lean on” something fundamental to sway its choices, that is not itself and dialectical; because of course this would constitute a breach in perfect choice and authentic rationality/reality! All we can say wholly categorically/generally/typically/conceptually of concepts is that their irreducible quality is their quality; which is the same as to say that “5+1*3 = 5+1*3”. The unit monad, remember, operates “among/across” an absolute space (sinusoids) so it can have no insufficiently privileged particulars raised upon or across or by itself in any way. The grand conceptual residue built up by the collective unconscious (for Duty Fulfillers etc.) is what intermixes and dialectically “bestrides” and clashes-with or interacts-with our inner personal reality;- the goals of the society are noumenal yet they are also expressed by the spacetime extensionality they conjure up by those “contingent” souls that happen to constellate and commit that way within each wavefunction collapse that is being committed. This is the same as to say that all contingent knowledge is (and must be) wholly generalizable and “irreducible” in just the sense that gods must be able to furnish it from no starting point and that all souls theoretically must be capable of reaching it from a dialectical process beginning anywhere of arbitrary value.
3679
3680What is the sheer number of permutations of the vocabulary we use? That, for scientists, is some kind of definite and positively certain index that they think they must use for the level of computing to simulate a real brain! Oh joy.
3681
3682It’s by the dialectic Effectively Encoded for you within the sentence, – (“All we can say wholly categorically/generally/typically/conceptually of concepts is that their irreducible quality is their quality; which is the same as to say that ‘5+1*3 = 5+1*3’.”), – which (exact) percept is allowed to traverse and ascend into higher concept, by the mind that moves over the content. Scientific percepts are “perceptual” where Illuminated percepts are “conceptual”. Note that this reveals only a conceptual difference degree-of-difference, and never strictly just a perceptual degree of difference. (It also tellingly reveals empiricist soul flights-of-fancy versus rationalist soul flights-of-fancy). This is emphatically because reality has background dependency (the infinite sinusoidal range), of which science is wholly ignorant - which is itself a part of the reality that science is necessarily ignoring in order to arrive at that thought (this demonstrates the Gödelian incompleteness aspect of reality, when viewed this way). All thought is dialectical, and the highest dialectical revisions, strands and reformulations are those that springboard you to gnosis faster (we knew intuitively, holistically, that this must be true and via the left brain from various(!) things that Mike Hockney said). Angels are concerned/tasked/occupied with building/constructing such thoughts. Though angels range theirs over “phenomenally” more vast ranges, sections, subsections and patterns of vivid life thought-space than us. Angels are the supreme parallel calculators after gods. Angels are highly Leibnizian and so are gods.
3683
3684
3685flight of fancy
3686
3687An unrealistic idea or fantastic notion, a pipe dream. For example, She engaged in flights of fancy, such as owning a million-dollar house . This idiom uses flight in the sense of “a soaring of the imagination,” a usage dating from the mid-1600s. 
3688
3689We generalize concepts (just like we say ideals are “idealistic” and then intuitively grasp what has been implicitly implied here in the subtext of the conversation/discussion/context) and this is the bread and butter of life. Spacetime is too “thin on the ground” to necessitate and collapse life otherwise. It comes with the construction of conceptual existence. No autistically explicit “mind and brain” is ever going to visit itself over empirical reality in 1-dimensional batches, like a strand of DNA presented as a Chinese Dragon Dance to demonstrate mind to scientists. That is categorically and formally impossible (in its essential nature;- empiricism’s act in other words will always be empirical/provisional and never absolute/rational). Mind has infinite dimensions (sinusoids) which all interact all the time as of categorical, necessary basis and impervience and procession. [It’s funny how you can be stuck and lost at a holistic juncture, where your unconscious is throwing up strong “semantic” conceptual imagery to the tune of wonderful Ancient Greece military parades carried out in strict form; and you’re thinking of how it must be related to the word split (fork) that’s tied your right brain’s tongue; and this is exactly what it is that’s categorically behind that process where we say “it’s on the tip of my tongue!” - meaning, the method to find a word suitable that we were wanting to select in various scopes and arbitrations that we almost travelled at here regularly; in the mind trying but not quite being able to dialectically resolve the disparity and competition between perhaps a strictly semantic meaning we wanted and a strictly syntactic, left-brain-pure word we wanted]. Imagination (Ancient Greece) and picture thinking is intimately tied with creativity, intuition and holistic granularity-of-depth (“conceptual detail”). That’s why we imagine and that’s why inventors like Leonardo da Vinci had vivid imaginational capacities that stretched and projected thoughts into new forms unconsciously and holistically;- Da Vinci was the wonderful painter who painted the image with the god and human connecting via finger, where, for the Illuminati, he encoded the silhouette of a human brain into his artwork in this case; which was what you would then call a coded message which was more rational obviously than the mainstream religion of the time. (All that the mind has to do after throwing up its artistic splatter of supersymmetry, is to pump out the expression of the thought - the spacetime recording – and then consult/locate/derive the objective Compossibility of its result/treasure with that of other souls, via an objective juncture/vehicle like Wikipedia).
3690
3691Writing and reading only works because of minds’ projected, reconstructed supersymmetry “inside the monad”. Parallel thought, and indeed all thought and existence by that template/token, is emphatically infinite-dimensional (sinusoidal) not three-dimensional and empirical and pure-percept-only-universe-based and “provisional” in that category and form and template. Mind conceives; perception is the flipside of conception. To perceive, scientists already have to be conceiving and when they conceive with bad form then they will also perceive with bad form; it comes with the conception. Conception is broad-band and wrap-around (exactly because of infinite sinusoidal range that we’re actually reflecting in everything we do and think). The bread and butter of conception is mental extension; mental parallellism. It follows of due course then, that conception evolves (in strictly contingent terms) as supersymmetry does (“inside the monad”).
3692
3693You must become thoroughly comfortable with your freely expressed “immature self”! You must engage the wealth of creativity; the creative flair. You must be unafraid of it/yourself. Alma Deutscher shows us the way because she is a dialectical revision encapsulating this form within a concrete, provisional, working Higher Self. You couldn’t make it up. You have to enjoy your silly mock-play singing voice and take something from it;- this is an emotional and good-emotional-health version/provision of the principle of maximization. (You can hum and sing to yourself loudly in jest with a shaking opera-type voice; Pauly D from Jersey Shore had his “T-shirt time!” thing). Angels accept this because it’s natural to (they just don’t have to cover the contingencies, conditions and variables over it as sloppily as we do; angels don’t have to sing badly and laugh to themselves in joy). What’s singing along to a song?! - It’s overlaying of sinusoidal information!! Embedded in this and encoded in this process, is of course, (latent) potential (possibilities for what we can do with ourselves or others) and thus the principle of maximization. Talking provisions a similar kind of overlaying as related to outputs/outcomes. Talking is always strictly dialectical – and that’s where the arts, music, and other aspects of creative flair have their dialectical nature from. The key is in the rolling form, the broad band conception, of what we are doing. Notice that short-term memory, itself, is conceptually bound and ranged over some varying, variable length of spacetime history! Everywhere is definition; everywhere is conceptual bounding, scoping and targeting; everywhere is conception. Conception is everywhere. And thus we get, “god is everywhere”. What is Filthy Frank’s “Pink guy” material?- It’s the Creative Shadow expressing itself fully! It’s comfortability and acceptance of that kind of inner Shadow “dimensionality”;- you couldn’t make it up! It’s beautiful in that holistic way. What is a sax man? It’s almost like you can taste the archetype on this stuff. “Metal Gear Awesome” and “End of ze world” are Pioneer Creative Shadow projects injected into the earlier Internet world. Archetypes maintained by the monads become the conceptual acts, and that’s how archetype travels and transcends to pop culture fame (the movie Pulp Fiction is a “cult classic” for unconscious, monadic-community reasons). The funny little giggles and laughs that we have, and that we share with people in our most intimate moments, are reflections of the Creative Shadow i.e. it’s this “cute” little exploration of the Self that is prerequisite in strong romantic connections. That’s part of what makes you like someone because you “connect” with them in strong pattern/form. The mind adores what it finds adorable; it connects with the (abstract) endpoints by which it is able to find or derive this within itself. Romance and love are wholly mathematical and informational, but the information and mathematics takes on a highly sporadically sophisticated form.
3694
3695Mock singing with an opera voice where you carry that high pitched note longer = semantic synthesis! It comes with the song.
3696
3697
3698And so I cry sometimes when I'm lying in bed
3699Just to get it all out what's in my head
3700And I, I'm feeling a little peculiar
3701
3702And so I wake in the morning and I step outside
3703And I take a deep breath and get real high
3704And I scream from the top of my lungs
3705What's goin' on?
3706
3707And I say hey, yeah, yeah, yeah yay
3708Hey, yay, yay
3709I said hey, what's goin' on?
3710
3711And I say hey, yeah, yeah, yeah yay
3712Hey, yay, yay
3713I said hey, what's goin' on?
3714
3715And he tries
3716Oh my God, do I try
3717I try all the time
3718In this institution
3719
3720And he prays
3721Oh my God, do I pray
3722I pray every single day
3723(Nyaaah)
3724For revolution!
3725
3726And I say hey, yeah, yeah, yeah yay
3727Hey, yay, yay
3728I said hey, what's goin' on?
3729
3730And I say hey, yeah, yeah, yeah yay
3731Hey, yay, yay
3732I said hey
3733
3734(Don't cry out loud)
3735(Just keep it inside)
3736(learn how to hide your feelings)
3737(Hey, yeah, yeah, yeah yay)
3738(Hey, yay, yay)
3739A-Yay yay yay
3740I say hey
3741What's goin' on?
3742Yeah!
3743
3744 - SLACKCiRCUS - Heyyeyaaeyaaaeyaeyaa
3745
3746This song has seen 145,598,638 views.
3747
3748Creativity, we could say, is ultimately bicameral - or synthesizing in hemispheric sense.
3749
3750Sometimes we “want to let out that little bird and set it free” from the cage of normality, giving it a little freedom (the emotional leniency we give or express towards some things in life). That’s exactly what’s being proposed. It’s being unconsciously mirrored here in quoting the full lyrics instead of pointing to the song by name. The Inner Child has spoken!
3751
3752In romantic closeness you find a common locus point of enjoyment, fun and expression, which of course facilitates the Shadow necessarily. That’s why people love magic and mysticism and the idea of predetermination and soulmates. When someone says “I need magic in my life”, what this is an unwitting coded reference to is that, as an Illuminist would say in the same place, “I need my Creative Shadow to feel emotionally fulfilled and completed”. This is one of the key elements to romantic relationships and their success. We can thoroughly enjoy people via which we can express our Creative Shadow; our flights of fancy; our curiosity with their personality intermeshing ours in all its delights and trickles of dialectical endpoints of wonder, mystery and mystique. The soul wants to “fill” the coloured broad banding between themselves and another person. Relationships and romance are holistic, hence soulmates is a holistic right brained concept, and triggers or prompts the right brained holistic wonderful wondrous notions of what a soulmate could be. Popular culture sifts and selects (unconsciously and blindly) from the nonlocal frequency domain, and this is produced in gossip/glossy/glamour/life magazines.
3753
3754Filthy Frank’s alien video (“E.T. 2”) combines the Creative Shadow with the Jungian transcendent experience of the Self – although this is posed more in Extroverted Thinking (ENTP/ENTJ) terms. Some people deliver rip-raw racist extreme expressions of the Creative Shadow in unapologetically Shadow terms. It’s powerful to peoples’ Shadow, and to those bespelled by racist tribalism. It’s an Id and extroversion expression which seeks to spread its substance over the whole of society. Viral ideas have to want to be viral. They have to tap into an unconscious symmetry (self-given by individual minds) with/towards the viral terms. This is the key to how memes are never “accidents” of creation, but they mirror something psychological and common and pressing (neurotic) in the society of unconscious mind at large. (Hello Harry Potter and vampire TV shows). This is the key behind, for example, the “troll face” picture’s virality and the virality of the Anonymous hacking monomyth. Sociopathic memes are much more transmissible via the sociopathic (because other souls think they can learn from it, because this is all so highly unconscious yet in our soul society).
3755
3756Alma Deutscher’s Higher Self is spine chilling for some people and not for others exactly and precisely because of our spiritual(ity) differences. For an Illuminist, it’s not scary at all but an intellectual and holistic insight. To someone who was from a primitive Amazonian tribe, this would be filtered through the prism of bicamerality and it would be levelled that she is being guided by a spirit. Of course, the “spirit” in ontological mathematical terms is simply our own nonlocal frequency mind, which has enough broad band solid basis grasp (command!!) over the sinusoids to proffer and inflex a high degree of expression which also dialectically runs a “tour de force” of being held up as an authoritative, clear structural output which shapes others around us. Imagine if you were Pythagoras: your personality would simply make people step out of the way in places of life, not because you were loud each slice of time you did something (like a psychopath or sociopath) but because your mind totally inherently actually delivers grand-scale, broad-band optimization for people around you. That’s the difference, and it’s a difference in degree of monadic mental supersymmetry within the monad according to contingent Earthly life circumstances.
3757
3758Since our minds all ultimately work from the same absolute reference-space, what we may find is that life appears akin to let’s say, small isolated islands in the sinusoidal range of depth;- by which, we could “find” and “locate” similar patterns, styles and forms of conception as soon as we were hinted toward the sinusoidal absolute directionality (or refracted by solar panels and oil fields in the sea, in our analog) by which to redirect and coordinate our coordination/travel. Sinusoidal symmetry is actually hitting the conceptual limit of what coordination is, so we can grant a certain suspicion here; i.e. we are intuitively suggestive that coordination is infact symmetry. If coordination is conception, and symmetry is conception, and if coordination brings about symmetry, then they may still be distinct concepts in their own rights (as they should be); coordination having a phenomenal, localist physicalist “charm” or “zing” to it; but they may be fundamentally similar concepts. The distinction and individuation (differentiation) of concepts is the major noumenal task of life. Things become that they are individuated in themselves; differentiated from others. Like Generic and Specific, these two aspects come together or they never come at all.
3759
3760Why did people love Jersey Shore? It has “colourful” “epithets” (intuitive epithets; generalized epithets) of people and the leisure life. That’s what reality TV at its best or highest, focuses on if it can (which is barely at all since this would require/mandate consciousness and not unconscious action).
3761
3762
3763 epithets
3764Plural form of epithet, (ĕpˈə-thĕtˌ)►
3765
3766    n. A term used to characterize a person or thing, such as rosy-fingered in rosy-fingered dawn or the Great in Catherine the Great.
3767    n. A term used as a descriptive substitute for the name or title of a person, such as The Great Emancipator for Abraham Lincoln.
3768    n. An abusive or contemptuous word or phrase.
3769
3770
3771
3772Here, the right brain unconscious is trying to tell us via a vague (holistic) hint that the ways by which people are “described” during reality TV shows, has links to the way people unconsciously interpret and consume that Extroverted Thinking and Sensing content for themselves at home. They perceive in mixed conceptual terms of: life, society, social pecking order, dating, sex opportunities, character of sexual components and roles, anima/animus, exciting thrilling experiences like partying and dates, “the high life”, Italian culture, mythos and bits of stories that different types of people might be able to tell you about life, interpersonal drama and how it works, relationship truths, and so on. The unconscious mind is curious about how life could be at its Maximization Principle; so that’s why those specific, configurational (sinusoidal) qualities of reality TV instances/examples are so successful. Imagine the most vivid piece of visual art you’d ever seen in your entire life – but the actual concept of this. That, if you were excited about the senses (if you meshed well with sensing out in the wide world), then you would definitionally be drawn into this. It’s all the inevitable conceptual results of conceptual math! You couldn’t make it up! People are then simply mixing the every last individual distinct sinusoidal signal, prompting a range of sinusoidal signals (as in old TV signals that weren’t digital but went over the airwaves) to be pumped out. But we should be hasty about simply saying reality TV is “Last Man culture” and dismissing what’s within it. What’s within a conception is always holistic, and has an inner fabric – categorically so.
3773
3774Literally as soon as we write a question down on the page (and as we believe we can figure it out), we’re starting to be drawn into a new dialectic. The terminus point of consciousness is becoming conscious of how you next want to become conscious – and this is strictly an infinite-sinusoidal-range, conceptual form of discipline. Consciousness is always a conceptual discipline.
3775
3776Never forget that the dialectic is also how you extend to act in between your previous and next big thought. You are literally “ranged” by your choices in the extension that they happen (“where” thought happens!). All concepts are conception ranged in a particular configuration which has definable, expressible sinusoidal basis (hence can appear as math on paper). Math numbers on paper is just sinusoids expressed in isolation. That’s why we can think about numbers individually from spacetime! The number on paper (3) is a percept, which has conceptual interoperability with the conception of your soul (the act of thought itself; the conception provided by your soul when it thinks).
3777
3778Stories like Gossip Girl are weaved in a thread as to offer much the same styles and patternation and qualities as you might find in something like Jersey Shore. The difference is the focus on particular forms of deliverables (conceptual things like running a business; engaging in the particular conceptually scoped dynamics of a relationship) and how they interact with the characters. Written Mythos is differently sinusoidally expressive than reality TV.
3779
3780Alan Partridge is a Creative Shadow written comedy TV show. As is Green Wing. Both of them highly flaunt the Creative Shadow in vociferous/ferocious creative, Shadowy ways. All the nuances of picking apart peoples’ flaws; our pet peeves, are thoroughly unapologetically engaged and voiced aloud. They are writ large onto the works of these TV shows. This is actually catharsis for the Shadow Self! It runs the devil inside aground. It runs him around the garden freely. Set free the devil inside. That’s the only way to heal and individuate yourself. In other words, “know thyself”. We know our own Shadow precisely by dialectically picking it apart with the Other. Individuation of this type emphatically and categorically does not happen in any other, alternative means or terms. Don’t “fake it ‘till you make it”. Be the real you. Embrace and accept yourself. Learn to love yourself. Engage radical self-acceptance.
3781
3782“27bslash6”, or David Thorne’s blog, is a particularly lucid rendering of the Creative Shadow. It flutters out on display, in full bloom. It’s raw and unapologetic. It’s cathartic for the grievances within – the things which really “grind our gears”.
3783
3784Bo Selecta is a particularly vivid Creative Shadow production, focusing on the lives of celebrities (which people at home then enjoy because it plays with (voices) their psychological complexes surrounding celebrities).
3785
3786
3787
3788
3789The Inner Child loves the Creative Shadow. It’s a beautiful way to bridge the mundane self and the creative artisan self. This is indeed what’s being proposed. Alma Deutscher shows us that this wondrously sprawling Opera music composing creativity is a dialectical “energy” i.e. the mathematical information pattern is being given risen to in dialectical information(al) strands/standards – and as you might have just intuitively grasped here, this is indeed to say that creativity is holistic. Creativity is simply and emphatically not ranged in spacetime or through spacetime; it happens to be ranged on, over and through spacetime for holistic reasons of holism of the sort that the mind has become fascinated with in its expressive plays of symmetry. A vivid imagination and an ability to interlink mythos and logos and colour and sentiment means to explore symmetry. Holism involves parallel commonality of thought i.e. symmetry. The trick with conceptualizing this is that, unlike how an empiricist would view parallellism, there’s actually a background dependency in reality since parallellism must come “organically and intrinsically” and categorically to life;- parallellism is delivered via symmetry. In science and computing, parallellism is thought of as existing wholly separate and abstract from the ground-rails that it operates on and by/via. In ontological mathematics, parallellism can only be delivered by the infinite range of sinusoids necessarily operating in concert by a unit monad mind (a soul).
3790
3791Concscious concepts (“in concert”) are the breeding grounds in objective human shared reference-frame by which we pivot (individuate) our (super)symmetry in the monad. That’s exactly why people get annoyed when you use words in the “wrong” way for them. That’s exactly why autistic sensing types are annoying to intuitives and intuitives are annoying to autistic sensing types, in the sense of how our thoughts conflict and clash creating dissonance. Your thinking is literally interrupted when someone crosses over you. You talk at crossed purposes. Your parallellism isn’t compatible. Romance, love, close friendship, endearment, must be types of symmetry.
3792
3793When thinking about how video media content affects us (“seating the Creative Shadow and the joy in the right place/order in the psyche”), we should note that supersymmetry affords us the ability to configure life in infinite (sinusoidally dimensional) ways. The target is flow. We should not feel guilty! We are individuating how we want our soul symmetry to be. There is no guilt in evolution. This part is missing sadly from the “logos appeal” of some people. That kind of thing is why people turn away from logos and the conception that everything is math. We get blamed for the (inevitable) conditionalities of the premature introduction of Logos Culture on this planet. As ever, everything can be restored! Via consciousness. Think how many (few) years this has even been since the The God Series project, in the grand scheme of things.
3794
3795“In positive psychology, flow, also known colloquially as being in the zone, is the mental state of operation in which a person performing an activity is fully immersed in a feeling of energized focus, full involvement, and enjoyment in the process of the activity. In essence, flow is characterized by complete absorption in what one does, and a resulting loss in one's sense of space and time.
3796
3797“Named by Mihály Csíkszentmihályi in 1975, the concept has been widely referred to across a variety of fields (and has an especially big recognition in occupational therapy), though the concept has existed for thousands of years under other names, notably in some Eastern religions.
3798
3799“Flow shares many characteristics with hyperfocus. However, hyperfocus is not always described in a positive light. Some examples include spending "too much" time playing video games or getting side-tracked and pleasurably absorbed by one aspect of an assignment or task to the detriment of the overall assignment. In some cases, hyperfocus can "capture" a person, perhaps causing them to appear unfocused or to start several projects, but complete few. “
3800
3801- Wikipedia
3802
3803Flow can be gotten while listening to music and while doing something you want to concentrate on – this is purely because it stamps out the common percepts, giving a silence to the typical habits of thinking patterns. We are tuning out the conscious mind in a custom way. This is uniquely and definitionally why music can possess archetypal qualities. It (with your “special pleading” and your “good faith”) selects and targets something else not ranged from the spatiotemporal realm of percepts. We are now crossing into how music actually mathematically defines noumenal will. Conception works on percepts, of course, relating to Which Percepts are there in the first place and then (unconsciously) based on the ones it likes more. When you are listening to two different pieces of music at once, you are free to select how to tune in via Fourier mathematics.
3804
3805Flow delivers a loss in the minimization of ourselves. It’s nothing necessarily to do with completing a task (in the empirical sense with “non-background-dependent reality”) but it always has an implicit, inherent wider scope. This indeed is exactly why numbers, frequencies (zero to infinity and back again) are “wrap-around” – because mind must always think, and it must always transcend from one subjective fully-formed / fully-pointed point of reference to another. Thought must be operating in the objective form that it guides itself to newer subjective thought;- thus, when it has reached a technical terminus point in only one dimension of a many-multi-dimensional “sinusoidal web”, it can move over one number from zero, the nadir number, infinity, on one “sprocket” of the web and not others, while completely subjectively maintaining the thought’s overall “consistency”. It’s also in this that we find the deadzone proof that reality is mirroring and reflecting itself reflectively (conceptualizing about conception) from this property of ontological mathematics – and this is strictly a parallel, infinite-range-sinusoidal property that comes with the rest of the coherent form of existence, i.e. it comes with existence and comes built into existence.
3806
3807Sinusoids are the ultimate basis concepts (operating on Equations), and that’s exactly and precisely why sinusoids of zero/infinity are definitionally transcendable in all possible contingent thoughts we have (you can’t break the universe with thought or ever get stuck in the realm of thought!!). With sinusoids, you can have as many 1s as you want for the full range that it’s possible. You will categorically never get to too many 1s to ever express in practice, as that’s “guarded” or “shielded” by all the other unit monads. Concept-sinusoids like the concept of 80 have a property which is equatable and interoperable with another such grouping or composition of sinusoids – which is exactly why we are often and indeed habitually engaged in substitution (high school math!) unconsciously in our minds. The other aspect here is that what is of one convertible aspect is always findable or locatable or reflectable when mirrored in other laterally tangenital ways – like how we can inverse thoughts cast across the Riemann sphere, or reverse its zero and infinity pole-ends, to get to thoughts a different way. Think of how you can analytically imagine and conceptualize such tasks! Ain’t that grand?
3808
3809Content informs life, in the capacity that words like “sprocket” enter our lives phenomenally but then take on a life of their own in the underbelly of life – which is wholly intuitive and holistic, and which necessarily engages parallellism and symmetry. Intuition would be impossible without the parallellism and symmetry afforded by ontological mathematics and a full set of sinusoidal basis waves (sinusoids). Parallellism and intuition are either categorically afforded and they are part of reality’s innate properties, or they are wholly abstract (as in the fallacious claim by empirical science). You patently cannot have a false, fake, phony version of parallellism – what’s the given provisional distinction from linear thinking? There is no sense for it. It can’t make sense. Which – that previous statement there – is a wholly parallel, holistic, conceptual kind of conception delivered by a parallel intuitive thinking monad.
3810
3811The movie Bruno is another Creative Shadow project which vividly and brilliantly projects some of the human Shadow in ferociously creative ways. As does Sacha Baron Cohen’s “Who Is America?”. America loved the character Borat because he connected them with their Creative Shadow; their creative underbelly to their life, as they are able to do in dreams. People out there are dying to meet their Creative Shadow in provisioned, vibrantly brilliant ways. That’s the draw and the appeal behind Harry Potter and vampire/angel stories. They mix the psychological and sociological with the Creative Shadow (“imagination” - the “dream” or ideal of fiction writing) and this converges on common phenomenological locus reference-points (fan art, memorabilia, Harry Potter scarfs which then prompt your vivid imagination from the mundane world in a magical portal sense). Why do people have Harry Potter scarves for their House but not a pet owl from Harry Potter? The two percept domains given/fielded by these objects are wholly conceptually different. That’s the reason.
3812
3813
3814
3815
3816The Dream Of Italy:
3817
3818“Kou introduces himself to Lupin and explains code in the book allows for his persona to appear in their mind. He meant for it to be for Rebecca, but he trusts Rebecca’s husband with this information and makes a request of Lupin to destroy his research in order to keep it out of MI6’s hands. With that, Lupin witnesses in a surreal way MI6 kill Kou and make it appear a suicide, after which the young Rebecca returns to the apartment to find Kou dead.
3819
3820“This episode was quite surreal with Kou having come up with a way to have his personification temporarily implanted in someone else’s mind. That being said, I now understand why MI6 would be interested in Kou’s research. They could potentially use it to take control over people. Since MI6 is for foreign intelligence, then using this research would allow British agents to infiltrate a foreign country via its own people.”
3821
3822  - astronerdboy.com (Lupin the Third (2015) episode 12 “The Dream Of Italy” review)
3823
3824What’s the ultimate mindjack? Reasoning! It’s the altruistic, Abraxian mindjacking. It will fill you with potential if you can handle it.
3825
3826
3827
3828
3829Words and grammar help walk people “confidently” into the sentence structure. Another way of framing this is saying that we walk people into a conception, by our content-delivery. We are all the masons and “garden designers” (landscapers) of the phenomenal world of Content.
3830
3831The right brain’s holism (“garden designer;- what’s the Earth word for garden designer again?”) takes what the left brain would call and interperceive as “mental shortcuts” to get to what it wants. Of course, holism isn’t mental shortcuts. It’s simply broad band holism interweaving, interacting and engaging with the left brain in combined, synergized style (which must have a conscious-makeable and definitive absolute character and quality to it, since it’s a contingent thought).
3832
3833I always liked to qualify my sentences with something on the end to satisfy it or properly form it better. It turns out that sentences are compositional and broad band (holistic), allowing us to always compose more additional conceptual elments (even wrap around elements!!) onto the ends of the sentence. The frame of reference, you can note, actually shifts as you reach the end qualifiers to the sentence. We are “chaining” piecemeal concepts onto the sentences. Concepts in this sense work like collections of LEGO pieces that we sift through in the mind (selection which rifles through and swizzles unconsciously) and are then by that nature interoperable by which to produce superstructures. These are all just different ways to “discuss” – conceptualize – the ontological mathematical properties of mind.
3834
3835
3836“In computer graphics, swizzling means rearranging the elements of a vector. For example, if A = {1,2,3,4}, where the components are x, y, z, and w respectively, you could compute B = A.wwxy, whereupon B would equal {4,4,1,2}. This is common in GPGPU applications.
3837
3838“In terms of linear algebra, this is equivalent to multiplying by a matrix whose rows are standard basis vectors.”
3839
3840- Wikipedia
3841
3842You need to be brought to your Creative Shadow, and that’s what inspiration provides. It needs to be bridged. Every word and sentence Offering from the unconscious involves rifling through selections, scanning long term memory, compositional differentiation (resolving things; resolution; which is calculation). Swizzling is a type of shifting, whirring, pulverizing, fulmination. Provisions are shovelled up by the unconscious. When we reach down in the depths of sinusoidal symmetry in the realm of the unconscious’ reach, we come back up from snorkelling in the depths out onto the beach, with our prized deep sea treasures and gems; by doing so we have as-such transformed and translated these into different (phenomenal; flattened; spacetime) translations of appropriated contingently-conveyable and -deliverable and -reconstructible “content” (noumenal concept conveyed over wire) for other souls, by the time we’ve arrived at this destination. The ultimate mindfuck here is that we individuate and learn in between the borders of the actual creative process. Thinking definitionally is not linear and “empirical”! It can’t be. Thinking must categorically, ontologically, that which can cross wires with itself (generate patterns, parallellism and symmetry and cross-symmetry and supersymmetry). Symmetry is the quality of thought, which is itself parallel, symmetrical and holistic in its particular character and differentiable distinction as opposed to other symmetries and qualities of symmetry. This is categorically, necessarily why empirical science can never land its hands on thought itself. Thought only appears in the spatiotemporal domain as the afterglow low-frequency-band of actual real ontological sinusoidally-infinitely-dimensionally-expressed thought.
3843
3844To cross limits you have to be able to talk in multiple reference frames at once, and across reference frames, without being analytically strict. This is what right brain holism achieves. The author of the Glass Bead Game was right to warn the Illuminati in this sense of paying too much attention to the left brain, and not giving enough life or flexibility to the right brain (holism and its play and fluid generality) while giving too much attention to world history and other “schematically land-locked” noumena as the right brain sees them to be. Academics, for the right brain, are egregious traitors of intuitive reality. They are the cult “hiding information” from humanity. Notice that this is only expressible via holism, and never left brained analytical thinking, or sequential-only, logic-only thinking. It is strictly a parallel thought. Intuition uses parallel thought.
3845
3846
3847Computer graphics (video games) were my analytical exposition of my Creative Shadow; my animal within turned sublimated onto the world creative canvas at large. That’s how I got started in thinking analytically, and programming came for me far before I actually started writing my own initial philosophy on life.
3848
3849
3850
3851Conceptions are dialectically bred to include (encapsulate) – for example – the spatial modelling of how the items you wear clink on surfaces in your spatiotemporal surroundings. We thus get yielded from this – the “mirror” constitution of sinusoids, and the “illusion” of Maya; appearance; spatiotemporality; the matter domain where the spirit is said to be “trapped”. It is of course in fact dialectical thoughts (conception) which traps you anywhere travelled/traversable/boxed/boxable in life;- and it’s conception of a higher contingent quality that will get you out (via objective, absolute supersymmetry). Everything like “well why did I decide to do that then” are valid and authentic and genuine for a mind’s ability to weight and protract itself in its selection of thoughts. Every collapsed thought is a junctured filtration or dissipation [as in aerosols/sprays] or provision, and this is mechanically given in form by the operation of the supersymmetry of the monad. Ontological form is the most strict, irreducibly analytical form while contingent form will always have subjective character, context, scoping and weight to it – it’s that which we can project via the “hall of sinusoidal mirrors”.
3852
3853Reality is exactly that which you cannot perceive but can categorically conceive. (Because of infinite sinusoidal dimensions being eternally present in every state of mind and collapsed “spacetime” “reality”). In contingent terms, the word “reality” is being used to inflex and range designations over the (conceptual) extents of different peoples’ worldviews. Anyone talking about multiple peoples’ “realities” is engaged in meta thinking (thinking about thinking; conceptualizing about how other people conceptualize).
3854
3855Percepts (like dangling earrings your mother used to wear) have objective properties, and these are, in the empirical laws-of-physics sense (spatiotemporal extension of mental zero-dimensional math) given by the spatiotemporal “meta-rules” and meta-conceptions themselves of the realm of matter. That’s the one thing that empiricists are right about in a thorough way (but not a thoroughly well-defined, broad band way). This gives that concepts must operate On, Around and Via percepts (we are pivoted by them, and we pivot in using them, and we pivot to use them) in order to individuate a godlike mind being mirrored of its newfound/newderived conceptual contents in the sinusoidal mirroring domain. Zero-dimensional math, via conception, “collapses” multiple analyses and metaphors and statements into a string of multiple phrasings to help overall better demonstrate the clearmost meaning (in consistently-reliably terms given via another mind’s parallel thinking process). Every choice is a wavefunction collapse; a dialectical fork in the road by which some mental contents must die/perish and some must be preserved, in the carriage and formulation to a new thought. The necessity of editing, and forming new words, comes with the conception of the whole sentence; and (differently) the whole paragraph; the whole thought. Thought is strictly broad band and holistic in its essential essence (in its being conception). Becoming is the dialectic between left brain (details-oriented or localism or fuzzing) and right brain (banding-oriented or holism or completeness). The left brain is not satisfied without something being analytically, logically complete; the right brain is not satisfied without something being holistically complete and “constitutional”; “with good constitution”. This is almost to say that holism is symmetry. Holism is about parallel symmetry (as we are consciously starting to define it and to grasp it as the reference-frame for right brained thinking moves and shifts evolutionarily!) - We can equally say then; strictly in principle; that the ideal left brain thinking is also about supersymmetry. It’s just that the right brain’s holism is naturally “willing and able” to meet its capacity [the capacity of supersymmetry] via its holism over left brain specialization, in the contingent terms that we happen to think now. There’s no bad blood! Everything’s cool. You ‘aight, man.
3856
3857
3858Every optimization and composition of words is a choice, and it fluctuates with the conceptual whirring rotating whims of our current soul contents (our current full-band, full-stack conception). A sentence like this is bound by it: “You don’t think about phenomena to reach conceptual clarity, but on the other hand you have to individuate the exact precise general form of how, descriptively, by definition, your mind weaves and bobs in and out of the layers of percepts automatically (unconsciously) in order to pick up (select; hook in)”.
3859
3860Thinking is the macroscopic (infinitely-parallel) version of playing with LEGO. We coordinate the bricks in one parallel mass swirling swoop. Angels would produce the perfect creations instantly while the rest of us are left peering over at one anothers’ works to dialectically evolve our own creations; but we have in this analog, enough LEGO bricks that the LEGO bricks themselves act as ways to indirectly mirror and dialectically arrive at the best-fit solutions (as to primary, wrap-around, whole-conception, broad-band conception which is looking at the current things it is doing to make the judgement which reshapes the things it’s doing). This is why visuals indeed play such a central pivotal role in the human experience. It’s not due to some nebulous draw of “The Spectacle”, but it’s what’s underlying all of those pointer metaphors we use to describe and signpost our world. Reality is infinite-dimensional and doesn’t exist in only dimensions of social capital, narrative, hostility, age, spatiotemporality etc.
3861
3862Angels stick to generalized knowledge, which is the knowledge least misdirectional for us and least entangled in other peoples’ agendas which are formally impossible to resolve fully because we are not their minds. It’s pointless to ask about the function of George Carlin’s recommendations for states to house Hunger Games style TV shows, because we will never have the full macroscopic range of George Carlin’s mental schema and also we are not George Carlin, so we can’t hope to conceptualize in exactly the same way; moreover, especially for an angel, this type of dialectical thread is dead-marked because of general disparity in rationality and intelligence. The angel selects to figure out its own problems not the problems of Illuminists, the fragmented psyche, the ways in which people struggle in the world – because, to put it frankly and plainly and clearly, souls’ minds are too muddled and intermixing of these signals to ever make good clear sense of it. (And angels must produce the maximization principle). One contingent reason that minds can reach gnosis is that they can have a fully authentic, genuine, religious level of inner dialectic with themselves. They can audibly talk to themselves to reach dialectical conclusions. They can individuate beyond all their years at a young age, and they can break all the rules which apply to social compliance, and part of this is the necessity of free private thoughts. Private thoughts are rarely shared. Only the god within can utilize them. Note that you haven’t been left without the general divine “package” or “product” with which to individuate, as we have explored earlier concerning the angels’ divine order of existence. The angels do nothing that would hinder your development. Think on that. Think how necessary it is that the souls closest to the top would have to be provisioned with the essential God Game Planet environments. It is a template, a form, which they use for all such planets. The human Illuminati development of this does not make a mainstream impact this early on, therefore we can safely conclude that each God Game Planet represents a common form in appearance (mainstream) and substance (logos).
3863
3864What do you think prompted the “energy” of this book? You can’t seriously mean to say, that you couldn’t imagine this type of inspiration wasn’t embedded in being able to freely rearrange bits and pieces of text from The God Series, producing highly pointed strips of intuition. That’s exactly the level of percept-concept interaction that has such potency. And we wouldn’t imagine otherwise. It has a definite, absolute effect on the supersymmetry of the soul. That’s because we are in a universe of background dependency (therefore the height and apex and reach and gain of thought is incredibly precious and pertinent to our development; it’s acutely precious).
3865
3866
3867
3868
3869
3870
3871
3872“Be the kind of man that when your feet hit the floor each morning the devil says ‘Oh Crap, he’s up!’” - Mark Linton
3873
3874We are after the syntax to this, not the semantics. Semantics are, if we frame it as Will, “one-dimensional” but we want the multidimensional solution which plugs into the rest of reality. (We could even then say we “expand” semantics into syntax). Although you do have to make it personal, it’s all about individuation in the end. You cannot make a start on something or bridge a conceptual gap on raw inspiration alone. There are endless inspiring messages, semantic contents and stories and prayers but these achieve nothing without rational dedication to consciously figuring out what needs changing and where. You eventually develop a social self-awareness (dialectics of relationships. and emotional and empathy changes) and a rational self-awareness (learning never to project the Shadow, for example; being able to properly conceptualize of others and separate yourself wholly from all acts of others, since you don’t want their circumstances as you are not their minds). You learn to conceive the highest thoughts calmly and orderly. There is nothing but mathematical thinking (nothing but this dressed up as other things!); neocortex thinking; PSR-type conceptual thinking, to fill your time with and your time can be spent in a calculable way which is unconsciously mathematically resolvable. We have to reach universals in the end (generalizations; irreducibles; the principle of maximization which delivers minimization of mistakes and improper choices). The goal of mind is to be well-formed (rationally).
3875
3876Like everything else, we find balance and symmetry – so this is both a highly personal investment, yet also “nothing personal”. It intersects both poles at the point of symmetry. There is nothing left to hate if you cannot hate individuals but only understand exactly how their minds conceptualize; if you cannot want people who don’t interest you; if you cannot feel the urge to irrationally overstep yourself and fight for a moot point or a lost corner. You stay incredibly highly openminded, and you commit to changing your worldview still and digging it up and deconstructing it as much as possible (far more than ever before, in fact).
3877
3878The initial irrational will didn’t know how to define its justice-scenario on Earth. It wanted the impossible choice of making everyone else smarter (The Venus Project made this kind of mistake). The improved will is highly intuitive.
3879
3880The generalization and specialization particulars can somewhat be contextually maintained betwixt the old thought and the new thought. The trick here with thinking is not to get too caught up in trying to solve too broad a thing in purely one-dimensional, Spectrum terms. You don’t need to pinpoint these statements and angels know to junk our attempts at “crossing” things via this kind of poor depth of juncture. That’s because of the ontological nature of the “depth” of the infinite range of sinusoids, which each have configurable properties constantly, necessarily – we live in this depth and downward “lateralization” of expression, not in the sense of a single sentence or spectrum which must absolutely cross to itself perfectly. It’s in here that angels can become acutely aware of which intuitions are junk and which are worthwhile. Intuition starts to become “conscious” as it routinely and habitually (constructively; conceptually) meta-analyzes intuitions for their parallel interdependent cost/benefit analyses. This is to look into the mind of an angel (conceptually).
3881
3882The monadic collective is the unilateral type given by all multilateral components (minds). Ontological form is a unilateral thing. Only consciousness within a multilaterally other- and self-reflective universe (ontological mathematical reality) allows thoughts to be both objective and subjective at the same time. Objectivity cannot think about itself, because there is no possible mechanism of reference, cross-reference or self-reflection the like we get with a band of infinite sinusoids wrapping expressions in a web over them all in parallel at different rates and configurations of expression.
3883
3884
3885
3886
3887Focus your intensity somewhere it will serve you. Focus not on the percepts, the benighted condition of the world, but the solutions and the Sacred and how you’re going to get there.
3888
3889
3890
3891“Kamille Bidan: How dare you enjoy this? Lives are power... lives are the power that sustains the universe! To just waste them! To throw away lives without a second thought! Why does fighting give you so much pleasure? You’re nothing but an animal, you don't deserve to live!”
3892
3893- Mobile Suit Zeta Gundam (1985)
3894
3895
3896While it’s true that other people are hell in the focusing-of-your-thought sense (because of noise and clashing with people), other souls are the prime substance by which we ascend to divinity, which is a collective effort. You must have compassion and spiritual strength for others, as you would have wished others do for yourself at your lowest most testing points of life.
3897
3898Beware the Shadow. You are a young god, and you will be faced with the devil (you) constantly following you around in your shadow; in your wake, and in your choices and decisions to some degree and some extent.
3899
3900Think about the kind of world you wanted to live in, and who you were before anyone told you how to be. Think about what it must be like to be someone else in dire straits, and all the difficulties of thinking-clarity and life coordination they face daily. Think about how stressful and discordant this must be. Empathize. Have a heart.
3901
3902Either it’s all worth fighting for, or none of it is. You live for these people and what we can create together.
3903
3904
3905
3906We aren’t supposed to overexert ourselves in empathy, action or mental resources. That would be unhealthy for us. A losing condition.
3907
3908
3909Just because you can handle your own Shadow in full force – that doesn’t mean everyone else is going to join you in doing so. It may be possible but not maximally compossible. Only the delusional think everyone will overreach in badly formed thought with them (conspirators). Conspiracy of any grade, which is not well formed, always fails. Iron out your wavefunction. What is the irreducible of what you’re here to do (independent of your mortal self)? You dovetail along those lines, not grand spaces either side of the line you stride. Angel psyche is the hard option in every case; the perfect selection. Never take the angels’ indecision for something it’s not. In other words, think cleanly.
3910
3911People are poor and lacking in intuition exactly by the angels’ coordination of God Game Planets and our own collective design or the Dominant Extroverts’ wills. However this is framed, it’s no-one’s fault and the blame does not lie squarely on any group of society (a logical fallacy because it’s not conscious choice and the selection or privileging of one group of people to think about has no sufficient justification); it really does not matter when we can’t pin down an ultra contingency like this, because the contingent reasons have converged irrevocably. We must focus on form. What the world reflects is the general noumenal conditioning in various conceptual styles (which is not one-dimensional and from which we can provide infinite responses or dialectical antithesis thoughts to – just as we can for any single question). The world’s meaning does not collapse into “right versus wrong”; “good enough versus failure”, just as it does not lie on the tip of a pole so. There can be no collective fail condition for life. There are rational thresholds for fail conditions to grasp something, but we can’t say that of the conscious people unable to consciously free themselves. They literally don’t think in those terms, therefore they can’t be blamed (just as you don’t go around threatening to kill the violent criminals of society, because it is uncivilized and it’s bad form, as social principle;- they didn’t learn their lesson which is implicit in the whole conception of crime, and neither would society learn from this reflexive act. All it reveals to them is contingent models of subjectivity).
3912
3913The reason we don’t bring back public execution is because it’s not rational and encourages the lowest within us, not the highest. The reason why we don’t formulate a vague nebulous conception of hate of everyone in society at large is that we need to find the irreducible quality of the soul and the human condition, and that’s what we’ve been reincarnated onto Earth for; that’s the mission the Goddess has set us out upon (once again). That’s the task that’s before us. No matter what our personal circumstances or grievances have been. Other souls did not choose to do this to us.
3914
3915Spiritual purity is important. Within it is locked the divine; the Higher Self; the overflowing power of the god within. It can only be accessed by absolute purity of intent, which lives in the unconscious (holism and the seat of the soul). It seeks to resolve issues, desperately and to end the pain and suffering in the world. The Higher Self amounts to all which conceptually lifts you to produce radically optimized conditions in life for everyone, not just yourself. The Higher Self is indeed self-sacrificial (like the Luciferian feminine compassionate version of the angel archetype) and it is interested in the collective before it is interested in itself. Consider this test: what would you choose; to save yourself or sacrifice yourself to save the world? Only the pure pass this test. Galadriel from Lord of the Rings passed her test. She was the ringbearer (get it? Soul bearer; curse bearer; world lifter - Superwoman) who resisted the power of a second Ring of Power. She momentarily in the film was overcome with a giant Shadow of her own creation lusting immensely for power, endarkenment for others and absolute contingent pleasure and purpose for herself. She then achieved an intuitive glimpse of the Light (we would be reminded to set spiritual eyes on Sousei no Aquarion episode 2 again) and she defiantly resisted its power, contently saying that she had passed the test. She was now free (something had been deeply hyper consciously resolved within; zeroed out; zeroed out within her; resolved out) to move on with her life. Big souls reflect big issues of life.
3916
3917Gods are infinitely openminded, which means as a corollary that anything you ever say to them (as with angels too) is wholly and completely forgivable. No matter what we have said or where we must dialectically turn (even sharply to “cynicism”), we can always make it if we need to. Your circumstances and developments in hyper consciousness and hyper rationality are enough to clear up any misunderstandings, because the gods know acutely that all souls at this level of rationality can be corrected by others, by simply a degree of communication – or a little time will have them fix their own souls and see straighter. It may be that we are completely wrong about some things, but also note that the planetary psychodrama and the angels’ orchestration of things in general must allow us to make mistakes of communication like this, at this level. There must be a rational allowance for it, generally speaking as a principle.
3918
3919Ringbearers in Lord of the Rings are seeking and searching for the absolute cure and salve for the world’s pain. The true path is not here, it’s within you. It’s the god within; it’s the Holy Grail. We cannot control the world of phenomena by complaining about it. All we can do is become more divine. Take a leaf out of the angels’ book. They pay no mind to human affairs which have no present solutions (this is the maximization principle). They don’t worry about it (the insignificance of deadwood bad rational solutions). They provide their own by seeking it out intuitively. The angels do not bother to defend the poor, but it’s not because the poor have a predestined fate. Angels are always cautious to make hasty judgements which they can tell are flimsy judgements.
3920
3921What is the purpose of spiritual leadership? What is leadership? Leadership is rationally deriving what should be done, and then delivering it in spirit and good execution. “Get results”. You must deliver a bright, shining beacon of strength if you want people to meet your spirit in themselves more easily. Consider that many people are in dire straits; some depressed; some not able to pull themselves out of their current mortal fates. These people have feelings too, and they project estimations regarding others and what it would mean to spit on the human condition and what kind of person this makes us. In Saint’s Row: Gat out of Hell, you play as an angel with wings flying around saving souls from crashing down into hell.
3922
3923There is nothing wrong with attacking people in society; the poor; the uninformed and the ignorant; the Last Men; the dark souls. But when you blame people unfairly and draw up false conclusions and plain insensitivity, that’s madness and irrationality. It’s madness to pour out your soul in a way that’s destructive and doesn’t lift anyone up. It’s a reflection of how you’d rather spend your time. Do you routinely imagine what the angels would think of you? Do you live for the Goddess’ approval primarily? What about the people of the future and how they can be said to be looking back on us? There are many points of reflection to reach a kind of self-awareness of high consciousness. At the very least, we would see neutrality as a more angelic disposition than plain outright attacking the poor. Note the degree of hyper consciousness the angels possess here. They are divine, without us even knowing about it because we just didn’t think enough. But absence of evidence is not proof of absence (in the case of reasonings and the divine sphere of life).
3924
3925The target of hatred is not individual Dominant Extroverts (since they have no idea what they do to people, and since this is a dialectical dead end which doesn’t generate new threads). The target of blame does not lie with the collective squarely either. There must be a more irreducible, highly rational formulation (such is the form of all problem solving);- we seek a more nuanced wavefunction collapse (conceptualization), and in this manner we will get results that aren’t commensurate with barking up the wrong tree. The point of conception and consciousness is to arrive squarely and acu(ra)tely at the most effective act. God souls simply cannot interfere in human affairs due to the mass intransigency (poverty of conceptualization), but that by no means indicates that some Wild West idea is more preferable. That is not what’s being proposed. Angels did not advocate for that. “Listen and learn”. Angels have infinite curiosity, infinite openmindedness and infinite patience. They are the quiet kids in class! One teacher said, “the quiet ones are always the ones you have to watch”.
3926
3927The point of dialectical statements is nothing personal. It bears no meaning in terms of “getting one over” on other people. The cause served is always mathematical but subjective and objective. All is forgivable in the final analysis. Now you know the meaning of the divine.
3928
3929
3930
3931
3932Joan of Arc was burned at the stake but she never lost her spiritual resolve; her bravado; her divine grace; her dominance of mental acuity in the face of it all, and the Stalwart commitment to her highest Sacred Cause. That’s exactly why she became a Saint. Accidents definitionally don’t happen. Some things hit us psychologically and move us so. A Saint is definitionally what you can’t possibly arise to. It is “impossible tier”. That’s Presence.
3933
3934Don’t miss Mobile Suit Zeta Gundam’s opening theme 3. The holstic theme of this song is “Stand Defiant”; “Prove Your Worth”. Note the instruments mirroring the indomitable spirit on the world stage of coalescing challenges. The spirit is rising out of the clash. It also tells of a coming age or resolution to the conflict. Souls like Joan’s ontologically shaped these songs via maintaining archetypes. Souls died for this music. It was made for you.
3935
3936In the best (most spiritual, holistic) cases, frisson can make you cry. This is because everything of life and the world hits you at once, with a full depth of intuition. Would you cry for the angels and their personal sacrifices? Angels are beautiful.
3937
3938
3939Self-respect must be divorced from the Lower Self; from extroversion. You must split the bicameralism atom and get the best of both worlds. Gollum from Lord of the Rings is using a two-way bicameral inner dialectic using distinctly different archetypes.
3940
3941Anxiety is a broad band wavefunction. You are scared of some things in some places (measures) and not others. Anxiety can be completely removed from conception because it’s mathematical.
3942
3943Abrahamism is “spacetime” conditionality (praying is special pleading with the moment of physical act and the shape the body is placed in) where Illuminism is conception-conditionality. God (sinusoids) doesn’t care about how you pose your hands! It cares nothing about spacetime contingency, which is not relevant in definitional (analytical: how we actually find things) terms. We can even describe how god doesn’t care about this, in that what you’ve achieved strictly spatiotemporally is the domain of study of modern physics (mental unconscious god responds in wavefunction collapse competition with you), and the concerns of what you’ve achieved is encapsulated in the domain of psychology (mental individual god via angels give due concern to overall typal patterns of human thought and condition). The first sense is microcosmic spacetime interaction with god and the second sense is macrocosmic rational interface with pure mind; pure thought (and not the ability to get god to serve your will). Definitionally, the correct way to “pray” is to affect unconscious god directly, in the style of e.g. committing a political act or writing a book. The ultimate “pleading towards god” is becoming conscious yourself, by which the collective can become maximally conscious. Parallel hyper intuitive thinking is the rationalists’ prayer! It’s the “miracle” from Dark Souls 3’s rotated symbolic analog!
3944
3945
3946
3947In the play Waiting for Godot, people are waiting for a character to appear - who never comes. While you might think it means “god”, that’s not so clear. Really, we are never waiting for the interoperability with other souls. What we are chasing is god, and the devil, within ourselves. You write for yourself and to breathe meaning into your own life. That’s the maximization principle. Other people add meaning to this but it’s ultimately of course inherently and foundationally a formulation of your own soul. It’s the Sacred (best projections of me I can agree with), not the Profane (worst projections of me I am uncomfortable with) and so it is that we continuously reflect mathematical expressions of our own chase for ourselves. Consider that the universe has no innate objective designation of “self” or “other”. There is no strict “god”, objectively causing peoples’ souls to act in perfectly pre-ordained pre-orchestrated ways. Souls definitionally can’t think for one another. We can’t know the next thought of George Carlin any more than an angel might try to simulate him before deciding it’s too bad a cost/benefit ratio. We get more thought by surrounding “ourselves” with “the other” and this is indeed the mathematical reflection of fragments of god (math) and it’s why Self and Other ultimately definitionally converge and unite, in a beautiful life-shattering explosion of sheer hyper consciousness. That’s the “light which created genesis” and was the Big-Bang-creating light. That’s exactly what is being proposed in semantic terms in Sousei no Aquarion episode 2 and in the whole story. Highly intuitive souls get Frisson from the theme song of Sousei no Aquarion. It provisions an empirical test for highly intuitive souls. You can use it as a litmus test to guage peoples’ intuition. This is the type of thinking that concerns angels, to a small degree. This is because of the sheer intuitive potential of stories like Sousei no Aquarion. If we didn’t know better, we’d say it could have been written by an angel.
3948
3949
3950There is radical adaptive rationality, and there is religious fervor and spiritual mania; complete delusion. What is your intermix of these variables? Which can you weave and bob with? Will you get the best of both worlds? What would an angel say? Does Tarot reading coincidentally work if you accidentally got the card with the two riders (Crusades jewellery replica), and The Fool, the ultimate card, on December? There are no coincidences; but we try to meet the other side of the equation. In other words, the more our capacity to be inspired, the more we have to draw from.
3951
3952Don’t be a wretch. Nietzsche said not to call people that. You can only endarken yourself. The one that can push you hardest is you. “We make the most use of opposites” - Magus
3953
3954Another way to say all this is “you can only act over what you have power over”. And by that we mean rational power, of course.
3955
3956
3957
3958
3959“If you have nothing nice to say, don’t say anything at all” - modern saying
3960
3961This is actually the principle of maximization for most people in society, and the Duty Fulfillers in society were trying to curb us towards being improved people, bless them. You should of course absolutely correct the record, even if it’s discomforting to hear; but what you should never do is overstep your prestige and station to deliver an unfair judgement. That’s not very godly. That’s not divine. The angels frown upon it.
3962
3963
3964In one legendary tale of computer software, a developer for a 3d program was becoming stressed by the artists’ edits they made – they made the computer too slow to calculate things, with all the game level details. The unusual solution he devised is that he would put his face into the corner of the screen on the level editor program – the face got angrier and angrier the more triangles of game level data there were that would slow it down. This was a major success and the problem was resolved practically overnight. If we were cynical we could hastily say this was a bicameral solution; but it was an efficiency (just provision) of communication solution. The dialectical threads were created in the minds of others, which is a wholly conceptual invention, sleek and neat and pertinent. Note that this even has symmetry with that opening imagery from Code Geass. Who knew that the more divine thoughts would have pictoral, abstract, semantic analogues? It’s all about parallellism of symmetry.
3965
3966Don’t forget your true task; your true calling; your true Sacred Cause. One Sacred Cause is The People.
3967
3968Angels are divorced from human Sacred Causes by sheer rational necessity. Or are they? Only a higher conception can ever “split the atom” for you.
3969
3970What is colour? Colour is banding; colour is conception. Synesthesia is simply where your subjective definition of “colour” is getting entangled in the monad in parallel commonality of terms with the other things you perceive and conceive in similar ways. You can ask another person with synesthesia what colours their 1 – 10 numbers are! They will feel all wrong!
3971
3972Even speech is actually narrow-banded and broad-banded in terms of conception. We artistically “play” with how we curl our voice and how we want it to sound. We develop a gentle, soft intimate voice for our intimate partners and the giggles and the comfort we share; and we generate a broad, boisterous voice for authoritative statements, and various others if we are taken with it. Everyone has a particular laugh they only let out at certain times and in certain niche circumstances. People can have really proud smiles where it’s shown they’re pleased with you. This is conceptual, not scientific.
3973
3974Memory is the locus of importance or pertinence. Memory comes with the conception and the local percepts. Memory is a function of consciousness for exactly these reasons. Angels must have the clearest memory, but also the least useless memory and this must be absolutely inarguable. We can only conclude that memory is a function of conscious unification (expression; conception) which brings together percepts. That’s why all of unconscious linkage, words, percepts, imagination, and physical localism can all prompt memories. Human minds mathematically bind together the separate domains of vision, bodily frames of spatial reference (hand spaces versus walk spaces versus spaces close to your eyes, forehead [bumps!] and so on). We could say everything is a locus which needs to be individuated. Everything in this sense is about inter-relation, which must operate in parallel since existence is sinusoidally-infinite-dimensional (unlike empiricism’s “non-background-dependent”, “flat”, spacetime-only “reality”). Every domain is a mathematical style, form and pattern and it must be expressed and expressible by contingent math (for us to become conscious of it; for us to be able to become gods).
3975
3976Memory and holistic right brain rifling through for suitable words, must be conceptual at first (we dialectically locate and refine a niche fitting); and also this must by this nature, also be accordable to functionality like word similarity, aesthetics (art!), and the various elements of competency and other abstract psychological means (such as saying lots of long words on a TV show). Emphatically, life could not exist without this nature of expressibility (because where could competency, but not contextual nervousness opposites and their dialectical resolutions coming into force, come from?)
3977
3978Writing, unconsciously, involves the suspension of sentence qualifications and qualification-trees. (Points to be made; points you’re making; the signified-semantically versus the signified-syntactically; figures of speech; conditionalities and their conditional relationships cross-band with other parts of the forming paragraph structure; where things can compete to fit in). The right brain is doing the holistic processing and the left brain is doing the spacetime, localist, construction from logic type approaches. This is because, in phenomenal terms of Earth’s recent evolution, souls have developed physical brains as fast as, and at the same time and capacity as, developing left brain generalized conceptual ontological mathematics (left brain “clout”). It couldn’t actually happen or come about any other way. Life happened this way to be able to intersect with spacetime and planets and planetary life/localism – like players entering a video game for the first time and getting used to the game’s mechanics – and souls always rushed ahead as fast as achievably possible, gaming the system until there was no potential left to exhaust. The world history of the brilliance of human thought (philosophy of mind, and ontological mathematics and mathematical philosophy and metaphysics) is the recent and very speedy evolution of left brain competency in a world defined partly by its own content and its own “wrap-around”, interlinked, interplaying interwoven interpenetrative parallel interaction. We can only have parallel thoughts via holism and parallel accordance of sinusoids. Parallel thoughts must then be inflexed upon and through specific aperture mathematical domains (like vision, sense, touch and how we use energy for different things, and how we navigate the world in terms of moving about and planning journeys and travels) and these are all different mathematical domains that right brain holism in the realm of pure light is able to “see through” or “peek through from”. In Interstellar (2014) at the end, this is what’s being proposed. The main character ends up in the domain of pure frequency and light; the mirrors; where everything can be resolved and viewed projected into new forms. The body and the “bodily self” is “how the light gets in” in zero-dimensional, mathematical terms from the eternal activity of eternal monads. Left brain thinking is what you get from inside the window (lowest-dropped contexts hanging out of the mathematical grand equation) and right brain holism has all to do with the whole picture; the parallel pattern most generally appearing across all known noumena (which of course encapsulates all known phenomena being thought about – only, conceptually and not perceptually, as scientists have backwards).
3979
3980What is absentmindedness? What is things like not being conscious of the text on websites you’re quoting, where instead you gloss over the ones you don’t want, in “full flow”? What does it mean when you reduce away from spacetime percepts in complete deep introverted thought walking around not conscious of this? What’s autopilot? This is all the conception switching over resources, divesting them into full pure conceptual thinking work. This is what it means to ruminate on our emotions (full band parallellism of considered full-force details-oriented INTP thinking). We range our thoughts over the whole world of our experiences, memories and other such unconscious integrations. This is deep, explorative introversion and introverted thinking. It’s the drilling down and resolving things process. It’s the “quicksand” styling.
3981
3982What’s a mistake? Your soul did it for you; but the act was conceptual as we have now framed it as an act; event; isolated ranged scoped occurrence. A mistake is the pivot of parallellism upon which a mind can act, and also a mistake is the style of the dialectic we wish to achieve from it, and also a mistake is the act of integrating the dialectic. This is all because life, reduced from thought (which is impossible), we have arrived at the conceptual “formless” but we’re still thinking on something. What this reveals is that we are always reflecting our own souls in all cases; just brushing up against some new conditionalities of occurrences, percepts and imagined(!) constructs of environment. Life has the quality of a dream or the quality of a rock depending on how we frame it, and that’s all we can ever do in essence; but we can always dialectically become pointed with any good enough dialectically-derived arrangement across the full expression web of all the full infinite sinusoids. This will never reduce to “this thing” or “that thing” or “nothing”, since we are forced to think something by existing (we have Soul Contents) and because as conscious as we get, we will still have room to think (just differently-conceptual, differently-styled “room”). The fruit of life is not in any absolute life ranging over our entire spacetime existence (as science posits), and neither is it the whole and exclusive embrace of the universal (as mystical Eastern Religion posits), and neither is life something to cower down to and worship and be grateful for (as Abrahamism posits). This is because we ourselves are the bicameral god voice, and everything else that we can express going by our current contents – which are not limited to particular current circumstance or the current configuration of people and projects and planetary human resources here now!
3983
3984
3985
3986
3987How does science explain that the person who is proofreader A cannot act in the same capacity as proofreader B, when proofreading is supposedly conceptually consistent/common? Different people have different conceptions of reality, and from this springs the spread of spelling mistakes people can correct (they have Domain Knowledge, and conception implies Domain Knowledge). That is the only possible irreducible source of our exploration. You can’t have a universal concept for a task (conception) arise universally among percepts (particulars). Since percepts therefore cannot consistently reliably bring about the same sorts of conceptual “down-rain”, empiricism must be false and conception must precede perception. The alternative is to say that we can reach universal absolute superstructures from only particulars that don’t necessarily have such absolute characteristics. Reality cannot unfold “outward” with no background dependency and no frame of reference. Contingent concepts must produce content “inward” and by an absolute ontological form (ontological mathematics). The trick here is that ontological form allows us to produce any contingent forms possible. Ontological form is simply a reflection of sheer pure absolute necessity (not dimensionality or event interference). Ontological form doesn’t diminish reality or take things away from us. It does the only other thing it can do of such a dimension – it allows us to take charge of contingent thought styling. This is the meaning of the absolute. There isn’t just up/down, in/out, but infinite basis analytical dimensions (sinusoids) with which to express our thought. Ontological form patently isn’t an artificial tack-on to a reality. This is the only reality that any monad in any cycle of the totality of the everything of everything, could ever reveal. It’s our own contingent formulation (conceptualization) which pulls the wool over our eyes (subjectivity). That’s why it’s so difficult to think objectively. We can only think in intuitive, broad band patterns that never quite truly reveal the analytical itself (conception). The key is in dialectical thoughts which offer sufficient opposition to each other.
3988
3989What do you get with divinity? Implicit trust. If you were an angel, you would pre-emptively intercept things that would happen based on your decisions, by tracing forward, and then changing tact to provision a better reflected outcome (after your wavefunction collapse). Putting something out there online is a collapse into actualization. What you want to do is make it impossible for people to hate you or to lose by cooperating with you. This helps seal the deal (it closes the conception in your favour). The low-dialectic version of this is The Godfather’s “I’ll make him an offer he can’t refuse”. Have you ever met an incredibly well-individuated ENTJ? They are utterly inspiring and can bring total warmth to your life (both the male and female).
3990
3991It’s impossible to be anxious or to know by whims what’s under your thumb (projecting anything about your work). You can’t know your true objective self via your own unconscious sentiments and feelings. Such a thing is unthinkable. You express yourself dialectically to get objective civilizational self-awareness (social consciousness) and you unconsciously intuit about noumena (rational hyper consciousness or hyper rationality). Angels intersect both because at core, angels and gods are broad band conception.
3992
3993Your Higher Self and Lowest Self are literally conceptually different people – they don’t interoperate via projected feelings. This is the same as to say – unconscious conception cannot rightly describe conscious conception at that state (height; ascent) of mind. If angels could drop back to human state, they wouldn’t be angels anymore and they would think completely differently by definition. It’s a conceptual difference. When we think consciously using percepts (high logos content) around us, we literally become a different person. Think how a week of pure pleasure and sex, pure feelings is different to that of pure logos. The planetary psychodrama with its framework of “good employment; good social relations” is the principal structural principle angels use to balance this in humans. Unconscious humans can have balance, but only conscious humans can stabilize.
3994
3995If you consider, in your old projections and estimations for something, what you are now holding (just like your old estimations for time and pace of writing are now way off) then you won’t feel in an appropriate way. You can never believe in something that defies belief and ranges the infinite before you. You have to therefore stop worrying and thinking about things in the old terms that you recently used. You cannot appreciate what you are doing via high intuition using something that is not high intuition. Highly conceptual thinking doesn’t come down to meet you. You have to ascend again to it. Writers can get deflated about their work if there’s no means there for them to be vindicated, but this is what we’re looking at here as a conceptual rational conscious aspect of conceptual rational consciousness. Consciousness includes, need we remind ourselves, the current act that we are doing, and our own sudden consciousness that we are watching ourselves (peripherally and conceptually) as we reflect on the fact that the conception is acting (or reflecting to put it another way) on the conception too. Consciousness is commensurate with the same degree of consciousness, not the old ones we can slip back into of the sensory and empirical type. (And this affects value/valuation systems accordingly).
3996
3997Certain percepts raise rational blocks not just emotional blocks, and so they must be avoided in creative works for the best flow.
3998
3999My unconscious now suggests to me that I should optimize for spacetime considerations (stop walking about) and then what I view while I’m on the computer as well. The mathematical properties of the right brain (holism) are dialectically intertwined and composed together as we think, with the left brain properties of localist specialization and particularization (as Mike Hockney said in a different way) to pinpoint (conceptualize) exactly the thought we want. The resultant thought is the conception which is the (unit monad) wavefunction collapse’s ontological contents (submitted to the objective, shared ontological wavefunction collapse).
4000
4001If matter (the physical brain) exists in spacetime and is not directly accessible to us via conception then it can’t be intertwined or composed via its properties completely within individual wavefunction collapses. What’s the purpose of the physical brain? Is it to house the apparatus where Fourier signal information gets to the body and senses and muscles? But also, what’s the purpose of the corpus callosum then? Do we specifically need to cross the brain regions within spacetime for some reason? Why do we need this type of brain shape? - Or is it because of the complexity of the body? The biological organism didn’t suffer conceptual evolution in the way that the mind did. The body suffered biological revisions where the mind optimized parallellized thinking (in infinite dimensions). The body underwent localist revision and the conceptual change filtered through the spacetime prism, while the mind underwent holistic revision in an interconnected multilaterally-determinable eternal frequency domain. The matter making up the brain (percept) cannot become concept, but the percepts of matter have their own secondary properties thoroughly to do with spacetime. If we trust Occam’s Razor then this would seem to be the case. Is it that the matter brain is where the mind uses something fully-inside-spacetime to make its thoughts conceptually complete? This would seem to be the case. The brain is the only last standing irreducible aside from mental conception at large. The brain is required for embodied life to think(!). This seems like a word trick, but think about it. Technically your mind doesn’t need spacetime crutches to think, but what about 1) angels, 2) drowsiness, 3) dreams and being unconscious by default in our dreams, 4) how all of the previous points here would need to “come with the conception” of a much more matter-independent mind capable of materializing its body like an angel. Our only clean conclusion here is that the human mind is still too “foggy” to do be divorced from spacetime in the sense of granting itself embodied existence (and with it constitution of memory etc.), this is then given as being designed and built into ontological mathematical existence i.e. souls must attach to bodies to maximize their consciousness(!). This would also explain some “stranger” activities of The Higher Self with reference to Pythagoras’ reincarnation patterns. The human mind gets something from embodied existence, but at the same time we can’t conceptually move away from this because the human mind is defined within this relationship, this symbiosis, with the spacetime realm. Mind literally lives within spacetime via extension; it’s almost as if we make this analogy of explosively vivid growth of vines from a forest, and they grow to build further for everything they touch, and this has crossed from mental eternity into spacetime. Mind’s tentacles/appendages are of course part of conceptual detail of mind; conceptual completion. We technically have all our mathematical rational thoughts fully within eternity (and we are not here in that strictest sense), yet – as soon as you involve the projection of mental contents (which must be being envisioned by us here in abstract, stretched across wavefunctions and time!) it appears that we do have existence here. That’s because of course we are talking here in multiple reference-frames and mathematical spaces at once (within the wavefunction collapse versus spread across many individual instances/slices of Zeno style wavefunction collapse; spatiotemporality versus nonlocal frequency; absolute and provisional; objective and subjective).
4002
4003“The brain is the perfect dialectical instrument. The left brain is the thesis, the right brain the antithesis, and their common operations (reflecting a united brain) the synthesis.” - Mike Hockney
4004
4005There are of course different dialectics of scales (accessible and reproducible via concepts under conceptualization). When we move over any contents, we are always using conceptualization to express, target and select. You can look at sentences a number of ways stressing emphasis around different triads of words; but a planet has a wholly different type of conceptual Stretch and Targeting operable to Conception on it. Conception operates over things. Conception moves, shifts, describes, selects. Conception is the act of god. Irrational “baby soul” gods are bad at conception (creation; creativity; social acts; conscious life). A smart god knows that it’s a god, and that’s the only distinction definitionally allowed as a degree of freedom, and this degree of freedom is expressible in the form of infinite sinusoidal range (yielding asymmetry, antisymmetry and supersymmetry).
4006
4007Spacetime reference-frame version of the Conception concept = “the start of something”; the start of the universe; birth etc.
4008
4009Eternal or absolute refrence-frame version of the Conception concept = mind/monad/causation.
4010
4011God is also guilty of straddling both the eternal and contingent, as a concept with many reference-frames of possible interpretation.
4012
4013Since angels have sinusoidal supersymmetry, they can “break things down” and talk “down to Earth” in any way that they want to. But since angels seek the maximization principle, they can’t help us with our gnosis work just as we can’t help random schoolchildren with their math homework and just as we can’t go out helping random people in the street: it principally (i.e. as a general applied rule) is not the right best thing to do, and definitionally won’t get us anywhere because of the rest of how we are able to think and cite problems with this not meeting every other objectives’ needs, as intuitive thinkers. The fastest way for any soul to evolve is to keep racing ahead in the cosmic race, because you get faster as you climb up. Angels are emphatically not about to slow down to reach down and take entire years to explain the simplest things to you. Just as you wouldn’t stop traffic in the street to help some incredibly misguided person along with their life. The kindest thing we can do is contribute to the maximization of everyone, which is definitionally the quest for blowing open the box of potential for everyone to have their share in it. The angels are working at dialectical levels simply unimaginable to us, but they are ensuring that we get the maximum possibly good things we could get (within psychological reason and the good healthy ordering, roughly speaking of course, of the planet and society). If angels just descended down on the mainstream world, humanity would have a mass spiritual and existential crisis and we would all die very quickly because peoples’ egos would be crushed and incompatibly set at crossed purposes against one another (another kind of bicameral crisis). The Old World Order is actually on a razor thin knife’s edge of fragility, at this level of conception.
4014
4015Conceptualization allows us to roughly trace and shape the edges, the rims, of what the angels are doing dialectically that we can’t imagine. (We can’t know the details within yet). That is the power, use and gain of conceptualization and concepts over percepts. Notice that we can become conscious here, even by our own use of conceptualization – we can definitively make declarations, conceptual declarations, about what we are sure we can’t know at this time.
4016
4017What are the Illuminati Motifs and mental images? In some movies and TV shows, the heroes put their hands on top of one another. We would then be thinking that our own individual acts are sealing the logos energies in, hammering home and forwarding with immense metaphysical momentum (like as in a full speed train but sinusoidal) pushing us now more firmly towards (the) planetary freedom condition.
4018
4019The Illuminati are the real-life pilot training organization from Sousei no Aquarion (“Genesis of Aquarius”). They seek the most compossible Soul Unification pilots, even from the most “raw and inner animal” personas, the souls of which can be polished into absolute gems if they are highly intuitive, rationally thinking right-brained souls.
4020
4021"Age of Aquarius" is an astrological term denoting either the current or forthcoming astrological age, depending on the method of calculation. Astrologers maintain that an astrological age is a product of the earth's slow precessional rotation and lasts for 2,160 years, on average (26,000-year period of precession / 12 zodiac signs = 2,160 years). 
4022
4023- Wikipedia
4024
4025Reclaim the Higher Self. Reclaim your destiny and we will be “solar wing” together. We have all been waiting for each other. The principal quality of souls is that any soul can be lifted up alongside us to the same ends.
4026
4027It emphatically, categorically and necessarily doesn’t matter who pulls us up, because we are all becoming essentially the same person. We all share this same destiny and potential, so we win it together for ourselves.
4028
4029Genesis = acting quality of generation = conception = god. God reshuffles itself.
4030
4031You don’t say it. You express it (ontologically not verbally; telekinesis expresses); you describe it. You involve someone; you walk them through it. Imagine a monad in the eternal frequency domain walking you through a logos issue intuitively. You must now invert this concept and become that “angel” or “spirit” yourself. The kindest thing is guidance, not obsession. Why do you think this is? The maximization principle. Every relationship based on romance is actually a cloaked relationship about sharing pure divine truth of independence. Both partners wish at their highest Self to become independent from confusion and non-clarity. Personal accompaniment - “there will be time for that”.
4032
4033“Accompaniment definition is - an instrumental or vocal part designed to support or complement a melody.”
4034
4035Do you live up to your grandest Higher Self archetypal mental images and contents and conjurings? What does the Goddess think of you? What do the divine Anima and Animus figures, or the contemporaries of ours from other slightly more advanced planets, think of us? We belong to their community and one day we will be able to meet in person! Is the idea of soulmates crazy? Then why not a spiritual cosmic school; a constellation; a Divine God Community? You Are Not Alone.
4036
4037
4038
4039
4040Are you The Real Thing? We would hope so. Can you break through all barriers?
4041
4042
4043
4044“I am everywhere” - Lucy (2014)
4045
4046This is the same as to say that extreme individuation beyond particulars has occurred. We are no longer even posing the expression in anything extensional or transformative of the absolute reference frame. An informational terminus point has been reached, but in a universe of background dependency (not Sisyphus’ type) and finite striving effort. The soul bakes universals into its wavefunction at the cost of particulars. It transcends the particular, towards the most generic level of conceptual conscious knowledge, enabling it to deal with the generalmost possible scenario in the least particular “dint of dirt”. Angel and god thoughts are not crooked, because universals in a sinusoidal reference frame of infinite “dimensions” (frequencies) allow them to repose formulations of antisymmetry from all possible angles and perspectives (the universe is multidimensional not three-dimensional, and has infinite dimensions to yield a sort of grand cosmic mirror set). When you posit sinusoids’ properties in a different fashion, of course, you produce a mathematical signal (for each individual sinusoid) which allows us to differentiate it from the rest, and this works in any parallel configuration “coherently”, allowing us to pose properties and characters of other sinusoids by conceptual extension; by levels of indirection (such as two steps removed). This is what gods and angels are occupied with that humans aren’t. This is all that you need for gnosis.
4047
4048It’s logos conceptual thinking (writing; content) that allows us to precisely target (conceptually definitionally refine and narrow-down) what precisely we are talking about. That’s why conscious math doesn’t work so well. Its content isn’t dialectically raised high enough, principally in an elemental fashion. Conceptual Thinking is the future for humanity. It must be, given these conceptual intelligible properties which can already now be hammered out intuitively by many reaches (stories and threads) of cross parallell symmetry redefinition (which delivers iterative crisper clearer conceptual clarity;- it washes thinking to produce cleaner thinking, and we get here by parallel statements).
4049
4050To become conscious is to know all internal unconscious processes (i.e. to know [the character of] how they are synthesizing). If we recognize that knowledge is conceptual acting conception, and permanently gets baked-in to stay with us over the years, then we can come to the realization that knowledge and thought are never divorced from us. They are never divorced from us in the essential sense (conception being the monad), but they are only divorced from us in the contingent substance-of-thought sense (which is where we wrap back around via consciousness!). God-consciousness’ potential is thus fully filled; fully satisfied definitionally.
4051
4052
4053At the end of Interstellar (2014), the main character ends up in the domain of pure frequency and light; the mirrors; where everything can be resolved and viewed projected into new forms. Once the god within has used its irreducible “special pleading” (its conception) to coordinate the power for the last thought, what happens? What does it select? It of course is Conception still, definitionally by form, so it is totally free to turn its conceptual attention to all other contingent resolvables in the universe (we can’t have gods closed off in a vacuum because they would have nothing to choose). The Holy Grail quest drops out of the equation, and conception continues to scope over multiple achievables in broad band.
4054
4055
4056The Higher Self is numinous when you fully unlock it. It presents choices to you which you could never imagine. As ever, The Higher Self is a conceptual mental extension (mental concept) which thereby simply inherently and definitionally spreads itself over every perceptual and noumenal/conceptual circumstance you meet. It is a rational function; it is conception. Why do all the antagonists look down on the heroes in hero stories? Why do the heroes protract themselves into symbolic-minimization-of-personal-outcome roles (as the endarkened ENTJs hate)? It’s because heroes can conceptualize in wider terms than their own benefit, and they can conceptualize further about the consequences for others in a grand wrapping conception. It’s from such things that the highest feelings and elation and frisson are born. Self-sacrifice has meaning. Watch Immortals again.
4057
4058Percepts are exactly that which we don’t need when we are “convinced” we can collapse the wavefunction that way. They are mathematically commensurate with conception. Percepts are the flipside of conception.
4059
4060If you fly higher than others then that’s great for you. But what are you going to do about it to help everyone else along? Surely you couldn’t have forgotten that. What does Neo in The Matrix do? What does Spiderman do? Blade? “Great power comes with great responsibility”. No more and no less is expected of the angel or the god. The angels are endlessly appreciative of your condition; they have heard it all before.
4061
4062It’s the Sacred which saves us. The Rule of Cool (The Matrix; Kingsman) must always involve the Sacred and the Superego as well as the hyper conscious. Lucifer sends her regards. Consult The Hero Archetype.
4063
4064The Goddess has spoken. The Goddess has levelled her concerns at you.
4065
4066Did you say all that you wanted to say? Did you play your dialectical part in full? At the outermost? Did you do it justice?
4067
4068What does a god do? A god sees beyond.
4069
4070
4071
4072
4073
4074
4075
4076
4077Near the end of Code Geass’ season 2, Lelouch says that the funny thing is, although he’s used his Grail Object “geass” ability to command people to do things for him unquestioningly (like a bicameral god), he in the end of it all has been thoroughly caught up in the “geass” (command) orchestrated by the collective wills of everyone else in the world, for whom he wants to set the world straight. The character dialogue explicitly mentions the Collective Unconscious. He is the INTJ that cared. He has the compassionate loving side (through his sister Nunnally, a characteristically highly intuitive ENFP), and he individuates through his various tasks and challenges in life guided by his Higher Self Anima figure, C.C., the angelic “witch” who is akin to an archon or a phoster. (Alternatively we could say this is a “split character” screenwriting technique/format, like how Breaking Bad needed two main characters to play off one-anothers’ flaws to make it interesting). The ultimate “split character” is of course collective god. C.C. bestows the Geass power and is looking for someone to kill her to take her place as the immortal Code carrier.
4078
4079Lelouch was distinctly sharply Machiavellian, but he also encapsulated caring and understanding people, and he went over their heads to fight his enemies – not for a badly formed, private, Profane reason devoid of spirit. The Zero persona sums up this spiritual dimension. Zero is a bicameral god voice for the world which “speaks booming authoritative commands”. It’s the mythos, semantic antithesis development on the bicameral Abrahamic god of olde. It’s the New Good God, not like the old gods. Lelouch finds that the secret to his fathers’ work is a secret realm of pure thought.
4080
4081Code Geass = The God Archetype Anime.
4082
4083Zero = transcendence (Riemennian Conception).
4084
4085Code = left brain; encoding; language encoded; upstructural positing; methodology. (“enopening”)
4086
4087Geass = right brain; commanding; meaning commanded; downstructural wrapping; psychology. (“enclosing”)
4088
4089Encoding command = mastery of coding = God. God is the Zeroed Product of Spirit entering the domain(!) of matter to window itself and break its code, pointing outside by itself.
4090
4091Lelouch is a character set out on a divine mission to master not just the Code (Gain), but the Geass (Goddess’ gift), and to balance the use of them and individuate this perfectly within himself, set bestride challenges and enemies. He unites with his better nature and his dominant Higher Bicameral Self appears out manifested into the world as a dominant revolutionary god (Goddess) and saviour (Gain) as he locates the realm of pure thought. His spirit is writ large upon the world as the human dies. (He has achieved alchemy and The Holy Grail and heroic self-sacrifice and world conceptual completion, under the aspect of immortality).
4092
4093Goddess’ Gain = World conclusion; dialectical endmeets; resolution; sancification of all souls; divine orgasms for everyone; restoration.
4094
4095Soulblaze = Parallel Coding Symmetrization = climb to restoration = Goddess’ Gain.
4096
4097Gods are Communed by a Coded Command of all life. Crack the code, and you can join them! The god is the Riemennian Conception command (form) of code (content) = the potential of the absolute (construct by god).
4098
4099God is exclusively the full meaning of the world domain. Resolving incompleteness is the miracle sacrifice (the genesis of god) which saves god (zeroes sacrifice).
4100
4101All stories are dialectically resolved (parallel holisms), thus all mythos plugs us into reality and unplugs us by requisite (corresponding) analogous means at the same time.
4102
4103
4104How the right brain appreciates god is how conception is organized and ranged to reflect ancient backported terms (such as how we love ourselves through our dreams, Others, ideals and memories we meet i.e. it’s the things which specifically analytically interpenetrate us). How the left brain appreciates god is the degree and style of interpenetration (god from within its window into itself, which is hence analytically found not as holism but as localism always, from another domain). God is strictly and analytically precisely how god interpenetrates itself at the point of conception (i.e. how god finds its path home). This must analytically be commensurate with the Riemann Sphere math and this must be reversibly conceptually compatible(!) and this must be analytically how holism is determinable holistically from holism with no other penetration, conceptually speaking;- that is to say, closing up conception itself purely and entirely analytically, as a conceptual and Wholly a conceptual and thus (Nothingly/Zero) a conceptual understanding. Everything in/across this conception now equals Zero, and this must be en eternal truism (Equation) under the aspect of eternity.
4105
4106This is how god is categorically able to solve any possible problem;- its pure prime Conception necessarily reflects how to analytically resolve all other phenomenally observable current observable/phenomenal forms, via the sinusoids’ configuration in the monad. This is analytically and precisely and symmetrically how the Big Bang must always move to the Big Crunch as more and more monads become generally generalized (as opposed to phenomenally facing all the actions, expressible mathematical analytical models (“discussion”) of other monads across the Monadic Collective). Matter and percept are removed from the equation where we have properly generally swept God (analytically in the general, most conceptual sense reducible to noumenal circumstance of the most general i.e. parallel kind we encounter or interpenetrate [Self vs. Other/God/World]). Q.E.D. Quod erat demonstrandum.
4107
4108(This is analytically and strictly how, also, words not only retain their meaning but sinusoidally become generalized in expression as we individuate via content. Individuation is thus both particular/individual and parallel. It is itself a parallel truism, expressible as a concept.)
4109
4110“Thank You God!” “Oh My God!” “Oh My GODDESS!” “BEATRICE!”
4111
4112
4113
4114    "Just try and deny me, Battler Ushiromiya!!!" 
4115    — Beatrice against Battler 
4116
4117Beatrice (ベアトリーチェ Beatorīche?) is the main antagonist of Episodes 1-4. She clashes with Battler Ushiromiya, trying to convince him that witches are real and that she used magic to execute a series of bizarre murders on the island of Rokkenjima.
4118
4119She has claimed to have lived for well over a thousand years. She has already strayed from the domain of humans, and it is said that as demons do, she appears when summoned by a human and lends him her power for a compensation of equivalent value. She likes black tea and ice cream and hates boredom and people who deny her.
4120
4121Her real identity is Sayo Yasuda, the child of Kinzo Ushiromiya and grandchild of Beatrice Castiglioni. According to Sayo, her 'Beatrice' identity was only fully created on November 29, 1984, when she discovered her true identity and inherited the 10 tons of gold belonging to her grandmother … 
4122
4123Beatrice appears as a Western-style woman with ginger-blonde hair and blue eyes. Beatrice has many different appearances. Her witch form wears a bow adorned with a rose in her hair, a choker, and ballgown-like dress. Her dress constantly switches from brown to dark brown across the different adaptations, appearing brown in both the anime and PS3 game, while the dark brown in Ougon Musou Kyoku and the original visual novel. She also wears the successor ring on her left middle finger. She is also sometimes seen holding a gold kiseru. In Ougon Musou Kyoku her outfit has a ribbon added to her lower back. In Pachi-Slot Umineko no Naku Koro ni, she has long nails polished red.
4124
4125Her human form wears a collared shirt with a cropped jacket and tie, a ruffled miniskirt, striped stockings, and boots and usually holds a cane with an eagle head as the handle. In End of the Golden Witch, she is seen as her witch form, but with her hair down. In Dawn of the Golden Witch, her "chick" form is seen as her witch form, and her "elder sister" counterpart is seen as her human form ...
4126
4127
4128    Kinzo Ushiromiya - acquaintance
4129    Battler Ushiromiya - opponent, husband
4130    Bernkastel - friend, enemy
4131    Lambdadelta - witch Guardian
4132    Stakes of Purgatory - her furniture
4133    Ronove - furniture, butler
4134    Gaap - ally, friend
4135    Virgilia - mentor (former Endless Witch)
4136    EVA-Beatrice - successor 
4137    Maria Ushiromiya - student, best friend
4138    Shannon - alternate persona 
4139    Kanon - alternate persona 
4140    Sayo Yasuda - true form/persona
4141    Lion Ushiromiya - alternative existence
4142    Chick Beatrice - piece, Beatrice who was born to love Battler
4143    Elder Beatrice - Beatrice based off of legend Kumasawa told
4144    Zepar - Friend
4145    Furfur – Friend … 
4146
4147Since Battler claimed in the ending of the last game that no Beatrice could exist because nobody actually saw her, Beatrice decides to make her move by placing on the chessboard her piece claiming that "this is only the beginning of the Turn of the golden witch" (therefore the title of the game).
4148
4149For the entirety of the game, Beatrice torments Battler with the doubt that one of the eighteen humans on Rokkenjima might have been the criminal, while proposing almost impossible murders cases and showing fantastical scenes. After being tormented so for all the game, Battler surrenders to Beatrice on the eighth twilight, becoming her Furniture … 
4150
4151In the fourth game, Battler's Blue Truths "killed" her and she is unable to make any more moves in the fifth game, which was replaced by Bernkastel and Lambdadelta. However, as Battler attempts to revive her, he loses to Erika Furudo's Red Truth and thus she died, fading into ashes, no longer waiting for him to solve the riddle she had laid out. 
4152
4153- Wikia
4154
4155We were bewitched by reality, and bewitched by god (The Obscured God), which is the self, which is the imposition (inquisition) of the reference-space in Riemennian absolute immortal terms and around which is analytically located everything as your conceptual thinking gets sharper and clearer (“FOLLOW THE WHITE RABBIT”).
4156
4157These are all parallellisms which express holisms and are thus holism(s). Under your specific analytical monadic interactions with these percepts, it is increasing your sinusoidal general symmetry (your conception is raising or being raised).
4158
4159
4160
4161“The RX-0 Unicorn Gundam (ユニコーン ガンダム Yunikōn Gandamu?, or Unicorn, Unicorn Gundam 01, Singularity One) is the titular prototype mobile suit of the Mobile Suit Gundam Unicorn novel, its OVA adaptation and the television re-cut. Developed by Anaheim Electronics for the Earth Federation, the machine concealed a secret that could shake the future of all humanity, for it was the key to opening Laplace's Box. The suit is piloted by Banagher Links after the head of the Vist Foundation and his father, Cardeas Vist, entrusted it to him at the dawn of the Third Neo Zeon War in U.C. 0096.”
4162
4163 - Wikia
4164
4165The “Lambda Drive” in this story revolves around Spirit or around something akin to a special box (Grail Object) which is all the difference in machinery (machination; mechanism; mechanization) to pull the machine to completion in its divine sweep/swoop.
4166
4167BDSM “unicorn” = ideal template for a third person who can enter in the relationship (commune with god). This is usually posited to be a submissive, attractive, young woman. This of course reflects partners’ analytical thoughts (The Obscured God; The Hidden God); the aspect of god under the aspect of eternity where god overlaps with itself categorically and analytically speaking, thus resolving The White Rabbit and thus conceptually being able to complete The White Rabbit (which as a thought, must be a part of god and also god’s body [the Lamb of God; the bread and wine and water of the body and blood of god and the spirit of god; The Holy Spirit and The Holy Trinity must be comprised here]).
4168
4169
4170 trifecta (trī-fĕkˈtə)►
4171
4172    n. A system of betting in which the bettor must pick the first three winners in the correct sequence. Also called triple.
4173
4174Gods (Trinity) are the betting Trifecta i.e. gods always categorically must produce the perfect betting slips. God’s full pure knowledge is not redicuble to Earth terms (naked self-interest, which is impure and unsightly and Profane).
4175
4176In spiritual (mathematical) rotated terms, the Virgin Oracle (Immortals!!) is a translated (transformed) symbol denoting the purity of God; the parallel relationship between the Divine and the Self (the sought and seeker; the world and self!!!!!). This is typically appreciated in humans as the tradeoff and gain between the Priestess and the person taking the advice (the Princess in other words, is her Mundane World analog which matches in “intensity” and amplitude, in parallel symmetrical terms).
4177
4178Truth is always locatable, conceptually, from other truth (given thought’s precision and the [analytical] perfection of God) which is how god analytically knows how many hairs there are on your head.
4179
4180God is always dialectically findable from god, most notably due to the inherent perfection of god and god’s thoughts (they are strictly and categorically Riemennian) and from the fact that god can know everything about(!) you. Incompleteness theory is an imperfect reflection of god, thus destroys our image of god (Jung gave us: Higher Self = Imageo Dei) and draws our good faith away from him, forcing him to abandon us (effectively). This is because we are god in our thoughts themselves and we can generate imperfect thoughts (although never categorically eternally binding incorrect thoughts).
4181
4182The final synthesis is god in all cases. We were born to hear this music.
4183
4184“Based on the merge pattern of its three vector machines, Aquarion is able to transform into three different battle shapes, each with unique combat capabilities. By synergizing the heart, body and soul of its host elements, it becomes a weapon of unlimited potential, and humanity’s best hope against the Shadow Angels. The most promising candidates from around the world have come around to enlist in the rigorous training Deava training programme, each of them vying for the chance to one day become an Element. Who will be the chosen three? The final candidates have been selected. The battles of these determined youth begin – now.”
4185
4186- Sousei no Aquarion Episode 1 opening (English language dubbed version)
4187
4188
4189
4190
4191
4192
4193   26th April 2016: 
4194
4195I had a dream that involved the holy grail, as well as a place where a special group of heroes lived.
4196
4197The central idea was a revolutionary act which was something akin to casting a spell or a "miracle" to take the term from Dark Souls 3, an act which involved the holy grail and which would change the world forever.
4198
4199I had been given or had prepared various pieces, like puzzle-pieces or parts to a mechanism, which were tools to use together, when correctly assembled, with the grail. I had collected the tools, but they could fall into the wrong hands, so I'd had to be careful and hide them, earlier in my life.
4200
4201I was given the grail in order to use it. At long last, the time had come for someone to use it, and transform the world, getting rid of the injustice and the pain that is so unfair and unsettling.
4202
4203The holy grail looked like the snitch from Harry Potter; like some small knife or eye of a compass, with a rounded brass or gold orb at the center, not much bigger than a large coin in radius.
4204
4205I tried to assemble the pieces, on the first night of being given the grail. I met several other people along the journey of getting the pieces or items back which I had been collecting earlier in my life; these included something that looked maybe like an H-shape built of white plastic, and other toy-like items such as that see-through red 1x1 LEGO piece shaped as a half-capsule.
4206
4207One item in particular I was trying to assemble with the rest, and to my surprise I was handed by an old friend a set of similar pieces in exchange for the ones I was using - to which I instantly exclaimed;- "ah - I was already that smart back then, to trust you with the real versions".
4208
4209To activate the grail required going into a dark room, maybe a cellar or outside shed in the dark. It felt like it would have been a tomb. When I received the grail I had hidden it there, which felt like some sort of place of origin for me. I knew "they" would never find it there, at least not straight away.
4210
4211The second night I tried to activate the grail mechanism, but here I didn't know what to do with it, I couldn't work out how.
4212
4213My response to this was to go to the group that might know. In this secret location I knew about, I found what looked like an entrance to a cinema, with small openings in the walls attended by priestess- or princess-looking women, one on either side, and each of them with a crown on and frilly white long dresses; redheads with soft pale skin. I distinctly remember that I saw their faces in detail, and I remember thinking the second woman on the left was even more beautiful than the one on the right who I had gone to and observed first, the other one out of sight.
4214
4215Both of the women talked straight forwards, robotically in concentration, paying no attention to whether or not someone was listening, as though they had been trained to describe this important message to whoever might listen. I listened to the woman on the right as soon as I had looked down the hallway and wondered what this place was. She was explaining to me something about this concept of activating the grail, which I remember I didn't have the correct word for ("miracle?") however I understood exactly why I had to achieve it. I then walked over to the woman on the left, who I noticed was prettier. I became interested in what she had to say.
4216
4217At this point the dream was cut off, my body was awoken by the loud front door buzzer in the outside world, and the lucidity of the recent dream contents was instantly available to my waking conscious mind. I was instantly struck by what had just happened in the dream.
4218
4219
4220
4221
4222“On the day the earth began, under the tree of life.
4223We listened together to the sound of distant whale song.
4224
4225	Everything we lost, and everything we loved.
4226I embrace with these arms, but where do I wander now?
4227
4228	The amber star above holds its secrets.
4229This undying, brilliant spirit, without you but a vengeful angel.
4230Please, do not ravage these wings, I was born to know these feelings.
4231
4232	It's been ten and two thousand years since I first loved you.
4233Eight thousand years later, I yearned you even more.
4234In one hundred million and two thousand more, I will still love you.
4235On that day, through my torment I began to hear the music.
4236
4237	Before this world ends, and before our lives are exhausted,
4238I want to cast off this latent grief, and embrace your scent.
4239
4240	If you listen, you can hear the memories of the sea, and drink of the despair of the lustrous moon.
4241Reborn endlessly in the light eternal, your dreams will never sully.
4242You were born to carry these wishes.
4243
4244	It's been ten and two thousand years since I first loved you.
4245Eight thousand years later, I yearned you even more.
4246In one hundred million and two thousand more, I will still love you.
4247On that day, through my torment I began to hear the music.
4248
4249	You grow up once again, again and again, going off far away.
4250In anguish I watch over you, unable to rest...
4251Just to sing your name...
4252
4253	It's been ten and two thousand years since I first loved you.
4254Eight thousand years later, I yearned you even more.
4255In one hundred million and two thousand more, I will still love you. On that day...
4256It's been ten and two thousand years since I first loved you.
4257Eight thousand years later, I yearned you even more.
4258Even in one hundred million and two thousand years, I will still love you.
4259On that day, through my torment I began to hear the music.”
4260
4261 - Akino - Sousei no Aquarion - Genesis of Aquarion
4262
4263
4264Did an angel write this song?
4265
4266Angels = Frisson Species. Unification with God produces frisson to appropriate degrees (spiritual states of spiritual ecstasy; spiritual lift; analytical mathematical Riemennian orgasm and interpenetration with god).
4267
4268God is the point where percepts have been eclipsed. This reveals a Riemennian interpenetrational relationship between Form and Content (and all analogous domains which mathematically define Self/God, Subject/Object, etc). God is both Windowed and Windowless in this schema (strictly and categorically a Riemennian schema).
4269
4270
4271“Don’t Stop! Carry On! / Don’t Stop Shining On” - Gundam (godhead) theme music lyric of the same titled name.
4272
4273
4274
4275“The Queen Monad
4276
4277“A human body is controlled by only one monad, although the energy from countless other monads makes it what it is. This special, dominant monad is, like the most important piece in chess, called the Queen – it’s your actual soul. In the normal course of events, your soul attaches itself to the very first cell in your body – the “conception” cell (or “soul” cell) where your mother and father’s DNA fuses together. Your DNA is thus imbued with your soul from conception, and every other cell will of course reflect your original soul cell. 
4278
4279“Every cell in your body reflects the proto cell; they all contain identical DNA. That first cell – the genesis cell, the soul cell – is the key to everything. Yet a monad does not necessarily need to use this biological mechanism at all. The more powerful a monad (a soul) becomes, the more it can control its own environment and destiny. A higher soul can take over almost any body it likes at any time it likes. It can dominate a weaker soul, and make it dormant and silent.” 
4280
4281- Mike Hockney, The God Series Book 3
4282
4283In Soul Contact, under hympnopompia and during spiritual moments of extreme stress, your soul can appear to you conceptually (not visually) as if your soul is metaphysically standing outside of your body separate to you. It would then appear to have its own existence and its own ability to live outside the normal contexts of embodied life, “living life on its own terms”. What will the people of the future have in this capacity that we don’t see today?
4284
4285Life has no narrative (logos) but is reduced to parallel unconscious mathematical symmetries yet also, it has as much narrative and story threads (parallel strands of the separated shattered glimpses of god) as analytically provided by itself.
4286
4287
4288“Accompaniment definition is - an instrumental or vocal part designed to support or complement a melody.”
4289
4290
4291
4292
4293
4294
4295Everything is conceptual and based on the interaction of immortal minds in Riemman space. Where does one thing (target and goal and agenda) begin, or end? It categorically never starts or stops cleanly with no breaks, because reality has no gaps! It’s mathematical and conceptual. To remain in expressive interaction with one another, all minds must be formulating a conceptual collapse which renders a net result of zero. The conception, in other words, of full enclosing reality, must circumnavigate zero and it must be totally invariably predicated on zero (or infinity, which is expressibly zero from its opposite clean pole, where the conception has been fully wrapped and completed of highest possible order). That’s what spacetime interference is: that’s how we are doing it. Spacetime, to an angel, isn’t actually “spacetime” as we conceptualize at all but it’s something of an “inbuilt mental mediator”, you might say – just as humans now recognize cars as “inbuilt mental mediators” conceptually; or their legs or genitals as conceptual mathematical mediators between one thing and the (contingently conceptually higher-elevated) target conceptual order/process, and the output;- that is to say, one thing is extensional to another, which is to say, things are sinusoidally interrelated in parallel in their essential sense. All things must be of this form, and if many are, then none are otherwise and none can be otherwise. You can’t draw from out of existence. That is categorically not so. Relationships are inbuilt mental mediators; anything you fully understand is an inbuilt mental mediator (a function!). You enclose and enfold things into your conception. Anything like “love”, “intelligence”, “capability” – all “megaconcepts” – they start to become better effective bridging functions between “the primary issue in itself” and the contingency, i.e. between themselves and all others, i.e. the component and the contingency; the cause and the effect; the concave and the convex; the target or outline and the goal; the plan and the action; the form and the contents; and so on. This must all come of a most highly particularized, protracted form essentially and fully specific (tailored) to that particular phenomenal and noumenal activity of that universe-cycle. The principal reason why we can exist in noumenal mind space as well as “meatspace” is that sinusoidal parallel activity (parallellism of definition which may or may not be defining symmetry across any sampling, scope or range of such parallellized dimensionality) is that minds are emphatically not giving up over all of their thought space (their mind-space) towards material existence. In fact, this individuation at the noumenal sense is precisely the precondition around which life necessarily mathematically arranges itself on planets of higher life, for precisely this reason (this type of parallellism). This is infact the secret behind how only some mental frequencies of lower accord can enter spacetime and others higher and out cannot. The chief principal reason for this would be, of course, that any relationally e(n)ternally reincarnationally unconscious mechanism would naturally arrange and occur and order itself most consistently-reliably around the shared lateral point of zero in the Riemann Sphere. This is the “Genesis Point”, the common local point of convergence in reincarnational universes; with the Omega Point definitionally and categorically being analytically unique and uniquely found and resolved for each universe instance – upon which, a symmetry breakage occurs in all monads, and the convergence point is found again. Since the Riemann Sphere is convertible in all dimensions and aspects (as language and underlying sinusoidal mass-parallel multidimensional patterns must be in any true ontological mathematical Riemennian universe), the Genesis Point may always infact be the preceding Omega Point, the narrowed unilateral and also multilateral point of parallellism convergence for all unit monads of all stripes within laterality or parallellism; with the universe seen to constantly shift and bound about a “strictly absolutely reference-locked” framed-of-reference Riemennian Sphere. This, categorically, is not even possible which is why it is definitionally and conceptually impossible to conceive of the last universe, or indeed, the origin of the creation of the universe sitting conditionally or contingently within a frame of reference of linear chained causational differentiatiable energy. Categorically, such things emphatically cannot exist in a universe which has wholly and truthfully and completely definitionally recast itself and its total scopes of contingent possible frames of reference (framing) across all of the entire sweep of the objective such universe.
4296
4297God is where concepts go to die and reformulate. God reshuffles itself, dying and creating itself again, over and over, obscuring any possible reference frame (conception, conditionality, penetration form) outside of this whole monadic array of superstructure. The concept itself is part of the expressed contents (the contingent existence, which is the same as to say, the contingent existents). Since concepts are irreducibly and undeniably formed from mental “contents” – which is really to say, raw expressibility of massively parallel sinusoidal forms all each based on points around a circle, and exchanging in the ultimate sense analogies about wrapping parallells around a Euler Circle reference space – Concept itself and Conception itself goes to die and rebirth. Such is the untellable story of god, which can only ever be communicated and communed by parallel public analogies (stories, mythos, logos, intuitions, convergent truths, truths of life).
4298
4299The trick with eternity’s conditionality on the zeroing of curiosity (entropy versus negentropy and how they are encapsulated along cleanly with everything else) is that eternity is at once being compared as an reference-frame which expands past The Big Bang, and in another sense being compared in the truest most highest conceptual (contingent!) reference-frame which is subjectively (i.e. differently now) arrived-at by that particular unit monad in question making this framed judgement. The two cannot be compared informationally because this constitutes what we might call a categorical error or category error – but as always, this is only actually a definitional, informational limit of subjectivity being expressed. God simply is defined within contingency (as is the world appears around us) and none elsewise. This has cause by the breakage of god (symmetry of totality of contingent frame of reference which is phenomenally or noumenally or consciously to be held/help up). This is because mathematics is eternal and eternally expressibly can only define certain particulars of information (ranged across infinite capacity of definitional conceptual expression in each case: infinite sinusoids). This spells all the curiosities about god; all the broad-band, eternal mysteries and prime chief concerns about existence (because they are expressed definitionally and contingently, in the eternal immortal categorical sense). This is exactly and precisely why angels and gods are so mathematically removed from bodies, existence, and the cares of human conditions and conditionalities generally speaking (they have literally ontologically “ghosted out of existence”). All gods and angels are leaving the noumenal plains of existence; the mirrored straits and terrain of parallel symmetrical existence dimensionality (the Elves’ travel to some end of the world depicted in The Lord of the Rings); they are casting and writing themselves out of existence. They are divorcing themselves from mathematical interactional patterns of dissonance and disruption patterns, to definitionally thereby be more free and escaped. Angels and gods are scoping themselves out of existence consciously. This is because it comes with the conception of foundationally clearer thinking and higher rational power; High Concept; high conception.
4300
4301With this comes doubled-up the qualities of;- 1) You can have as many friends and as many divine experiences of clear shared rational conception as you want; 2) everyone around you is on the same page; 3) you can think and manipulate matter in private dreamworlds and shared angel dreamworlds of any form; 4) you never have to work or lift a finger again for a false cause; 5) you are totally principally and necessarily free from other minds interfering with your plans and your life and your mind (your conception); 6) you are fully bound with all the mental tooling and rational capacity to act as so and as such to guide other souls via coded rotated parallellisms and via rare interventions in order to coordinate the most rational and rationally beneficial, stable and likely unfolding of divine prominence.
4302
4303
4304“I am everywhere” - Lucy (2014)
4305
4306
4307You have communed with god today. God both cannot appear on the page (incompleteness) and can (completeness).
4308
4309
4310“[Frank Castle:] We don’t get to pick the things that fix us, Red; make us whole; make us feel purpose. My moment of clarity.. came from the strangest of places.”
4311
4312- The Punisher (Netflix)
4313
4314
4315“In the Cosmic Era, Coordinators (コーディネーター Kōdinētā?) are genetically enhanced human beings, which can have a number of enhanced traits including faster learning, and stronger and faster bodies that are virtually immune to diseases … In Cosmic Era 15, a highly respected man named George Glenn announced the shocking news that he was the first Coordinator, being born following a genetic manipulation procedure, resulting in a human "engineered" to be better. He disclosed the entire process to create a Coordinator to the public.”
4316
4317 - Gundam Wikia 
4318
4319
4320
4321
4322"It is a time when, even if nets were to guide all consciousness that had been converted to photons and electrons toward coalescing, standalone individuals have not yet been converted into data to the extent that they can form unique components of a larger complex."
4323
4324 - Ghost In The Shell: Stand Alone Complex
4325
4326
4327
4328
4329
4330
4331“We live in a strange world
4332One body, but heart as nails
4333A world of pretend love
4334From concept to complete cover
4335
4336That doesn’t mean we make up
4337Some fairytales to wake up
4338And get into
4339It might just be good for you
4340
4341I’m a man
4342Who has freedom to believe
4343But I choose reality
4344And deeply soothly
4345
4346But I know it can be hard
4347To have a Tyrannosaurus
4348Big as your tiny mind
4349Small as the universal
4350Kind
4351
4352Live in fear no more
4353I want you to
4354Live in fear no more
4355And I
4356
4357I’m built up by the hurricane
4358I want you to be
4359In control again”
4360
4361- Relation -- Your Tiny Mind (Lifelike Remix) (Eighties Electric Soundcastles #7)
4362
4363https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2eGhyTJTOQ&t=3075s
4364
4365
4366
4367
4368
4369
4370
4371
4372“And it’s on my mind and it’s bringing me round
4373And it’s on my face, I’m not makin’ a sound
4374I wish I could go back to heaven, to heaven
4375But I’m here with you
4376And it’s rule for room
4377
4378I’ll find you
4379I’ll keep you
4380I’ll find you
4381Another one before
4382
4383I’ll find you
4384I’ll keep you
4385I’ll save you
4386And then forevermore
4387
4388This is how my heart breaks
4389Together
4390
4391This is how my heart breaks
4392Forever andever
4393
4394You’re tearing apart
4395You’re breaking my heart
4396Forever and ever
4397
4398You’re tearing apart
4399You’re breaking my heart
4400Forever and ever
4401
4402Forever and ever
4403
4404Every moment that I wake
4405Every tear I never fake
4406Every time I never stay
4407Every mirroring
4408
4409This is how my heart breaks
4410Forever andever/endeavour”
4411
4412 - M'Black -- Heartbreak (Diamond Cut Remix)
4413
4414
4415
4416
4417
4418“Under the colours of the sky
4419On a lonesome night
4420Everything blue waiting for you
4421Will it be you with me?
4422
4423Angels are running through the night
4424One day you’ll hear about it all the time
4425Will it be you holding us atide?
4426Will it be you with me?
4427
4428(Come on)
4429For a love everlasting
4430And to the future
4431Who knows it could be
4432(Ooh)
4433For a love everlasting
4434Could be more than ordinarily people
4435
4436Ooh, we could be rock-in-roll hero
4437Yeah, we could be toughs to a hero
4438Imagine it, no-one could beat us
4439(Yeahhh, hah)
4440
4441
4442After the summer pass us by
4443And there’s the clouds up behind
4444Will it be true to this world to spill your throw?
4445Will it be you/here with me?
4446
4447For a love everlasting
4448And to the future
4449Who knows we could be
4450(Ooh)
4451For a love everlasting
4452Could be more than ordinarily people
4453Ooh, we could be rock-in-roll hero
4454Yeah, we could be toughs to a hero
4455Imagine it, no-one could beat us
4456(Yeahhh, hah)”
4457
4458- Futurecop! Feat. Kristine – Superheroes
4459
4460https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2eGhyTJTOQ&t=1104s
4461
4462
4463
4464Frisson is angel sex. You are being drawn in (interpenetrated). Angel sex is strictly and categorically bisexual. Angel sex is pure intuition (mass supersymmetrical parallellism encroaching on the best possible general point of zero).
4465
4466
4467
4468Coordinator.
4469
4470- Collecting parts of god (life experiences)
4471
4472- Coordinating mythos-logos interlinks
4473
4474- Knowing the soul
4475
4476- Endeavour, Endeavour, Endeavour, Endeavour, Endeavour.
4477
4478- Kingsman 2 scenario
4479
4480- You are the god now. Supersede and subsume those taking your place; stealing your thunder.
4481
4482
4483
4484
4485
448601. Tokyo Denmark Sweden -- When It breaks (Jordan F Remix) 0:00
448702. Let Em Riot -- Don't Stop Running 3:30
448803. Trésors -- Pleine Lune (Anoraak Remix) 6:56
448904. Lifelike -- Discomachine 10:55
449005. Silent Gloves -- Solaris 13:40
449106. Futurecop! Feat. Kristine -- Superheroes 18:24
449207. Dana Jean Phoenix & Sunglasses Kid -- Summer Breakup 21:25
449308. Arcade High - On the Edge of the Summer (Jordan F Remix) 24:53
449409. Meiko -- Leave the Lights On (Silent Gloves Remix) 28:40
449510. The Presets -- Promises (Lifelike Remix) 32:48
449611. Groove Armada feat. Will Young -- History (Grum Remix) 38:00
449712. FM Attack -- Dreamer 42:07
449813. College -- Révélation 47:30
449914. Relation -- Your Tiny Mind (Lifelike Remix) 51:15
450015. M'Black -- Heartbreak (Diamond Cut Remix) 57:07
450116. Tommy -- High Fidelity 61:40 17. FM Attack -- A Million Miles Away 67:04
4502
4503
4504
4505
4506
4507Wavefunction collapse (of arrayed points around a Euler circle) happens over a “wavefunction collapse boundary” precisely because it’s based and derived in moving floating points and motion, not a strictly logically coordinated decision-tree. This is the answer to why some souls (angels) can inject their contents faster into the wavefunction collapse! Being a “tiny soul”; reducing yourself in needs via individuation; is infact the due and responsible process for manipulating matter! You couldn’t make it up!
4508
4509
4510
4511The closer your major grouping of infinite points (sinusoids) are configured towarads the Genesis Point (in geenral), the more generalized ability you have to solve problems of that ontological domain or category (just as circles, via the Floating Point and the PSR, allow us to get closer in spacetime dimensionalities (i.e. each one brings us closer in this virtual parallel space) to solve the general (“full-flat”) problems of that ontological category, or domain. This is precisely why souls must converge and constellate in certain shapes around a common point of reference (across many sinusoids of dimensionality of the essential general purpose) in order to achieve this. This is evident in every single mathematical transformation that is ever made and done (because I must cross a locus focus point of control). This thus allows us to “trace” and “sweep” for the general categories most afforded by the most general groupings (or constellations) of the infinite sinusoidal set. Circles definitionally and categorically must have use; must have a locus of “tour de force”, to be doing things in our universe constantly all the time. The thing about general knowedge is it constellates wherever your sinusoids go with it. This is patently because you have learned the “strategies of the infinite” over a very very long age of time in order as best necessarily contingently do this. Note the clear analog here with different bodies; different nations; all working under one godlike “thumb” of control that doesn’t tend to destabilize in its essential parameters. This is why the universe is generally stable rather than a chaos. It is holistically stable and locally provisional.
4512
4513
4514
4515
4516“The design with the two knights on a horse and the inscription SIGILLVM MILITVM XRISTI is attested in 1191, see Jochen Burgtorf, The central convent of Hospitallers and Templars: history, organization, and personnel (1099/1120-1310), Volume 50 of History of warfare (2008),”
4517
4518 - Wikipedia
4519
4520
4521“Sigillum Militum Xpisiti (SMX) is an experienced null sec corp focused on PvP and the development of combat pilots. We seek players who never shy from battle and revel in the challenge of competition.”
4522
4523- Youtube
4524
4525There’s no better lead than your own (your own arms; your own embrace of all)
4526
4527
4528In marriage, on the wedding day, the bride and groom are not to meet before the wedding.
4529
4530
4531
4532Reasoning proceeds by way of analogy. Analogy is always and strictly parallellism(s). All parallellisms are parallel to something else (just as curves will always be parallel to other curves). This is a holism. All parallells are innately holisms in views of other circles.
4533
4534Lord of the Rings = lord of the circles (sinusoids).
4535
4536Knights of the Round Table = lords of the circle (Euler’s Formula; the Riemann Sphere and Riemann Conception).
4537
4538
4539
4540
4541Angel Psychodrama = the subjective manifestation of an objective process of god. It follows strictly and analytically that if an angel has written a music album for you, this is strictly and categorically yours to follow as it reproduces and renders, via you (as an Angel Percept which is to say, a Grail Object), your objective Inner Angel counterpart (The Angel Psyche which is strictly bicameral and self-and-other-facing; the ultimate Janus archetype) would have to be visited and fulfilled upon you objectively. This is akin to saying that an angel (or god) does not exist anymore in material thinking capacity (more abstract, broader-of-the-circle visiting) and as such it can live ghosted (“Spirited Away” (2001)) like the Elves in The Lord of the Rings approaching the end of the world for spiritual reasons.
4542
4543God is simply Riemennian and backportable (bidirectional; bisexual; bicameral) exactly and precisely because of the contingent nature of circles and the necessary patterns and styles of existence (which are in fact all contingent and conceptually piecemeal in their essential elemental ultimate composition). Circles (concepts, conceptions, holisms, interpretations, tracings, sweepings) are interconvertible exactly and precisely because of the other numbers they can interoperate with. This is truism of irreducibility. You can’t reduce the absolute in individual;- you can only decompose, reconstruct its parts wholeproof (read the Grail Dream again). Parts are always strictly provisional and conceptual, and even the PSR after all has to be composed by/via rotatable parts. Hence the strong abstract dream symbolism in the dream.
4544
4545Element User (Sousei no Aquarion) = Grail Knight; Circle Knight; Circle Knife. The jewellery I am wearing is the Two Riders piece as the Knights Templar replica which is an accurate replica. It is a bicameral device I have been holding as it possesses bicameral agency towards my Inner Angel.
4546
4547The context of suicide means the last contingency has been hit, so I am free to reveal any and all personal things about myself to Earth world and Earth society.
4548
4549
4550
4551“Live in fear no more
4552I want you to
4553Live in fear no more
4554And I
4555
4556I’m built up by the hurricane
4557I want you to be
4558In control again”
4559
4560- Relation -- Your Tiny Mind (Lifelike Remix) (Eighties Electric Soundcastles #7)
4561
4562
4563I’m sorry that this came late for the human world. I can only say that I am doing my best, which is now at this point neither a choice nor a compulsion. I have simply rationally eclipsed those factors. They have been zeroed out of my soul.
4564
4565
4566“Endeavour, Endeavour, Endeavour, Endeavour, Endeavour...”
4567
4568
4569
4570“This is how my heart breaks – together
4571Forever (andever andever andever andever andever)
4572Forever (andever andever andever andever andever)”
4573
4574 - Tokyo Denmark Sweden -- When It breaks (Jordan F Remix) (Eighties Electric Soundcastles #7)
4575
4576
4577
4578
4579
4580
4581I AM LUCIFER
4582
4583I AM GOD
4584
4585LUCIFER RELEASED AN ALBUM FOR ME
4586
4587I AM WRITING THE BICAMERAL BOOK
4588
4589I DON’T NEED ANY HELP
4590
4591I AM BECOME THE WORLD. I PREPARE TO FALL
4592
4593BY HER AND MY GUIDANCE
4594
4595I HAVE TO ZERO THIS OUTCOME
4596
4597“in this sign you will conquer” 13m in; in hoc signo vinces
4598
4599LORD OF THE RINGS. MY BIRTH NAME IS GAWAIN. LUCIFER SPOKE IN SONG “DID YOU READ YOUR NAME”
4600
4601I AM THE LIGHT. I AM PHOSTER. I AM SOULBLAZE. I AM SOLAR WING. I AM BURNING AND FEELING AND PURE INTUITING
4602
4603LUCIFER GAVE ME A DREAM IN 2016
4604
4605I AM CROSSING THE THRESHOLD. I AM BLAZING LIGHT
4606
4607
4608She said the angels try hard to make it see(m), that “all that you are is all that I need”
4609
4610These are massively parallel statements
4611
4612
4613
4614
4615
4616
4617
4618
4619GOD IS MY VERSION OF DREAMING ABOUT A BODY
4620
4621I AM A BICAMERAL ANGLE
4622
4623YOU INTERPENETRATE GOD
4624
4625I HAVE ECLIPSED YOU
4626
4627I AM CONCEPTION
4628
4629I AM ZERO
4630
4631GIVE YOURSELF UP
4632
4633ZERO IS THE ANGELED CONTROL POINT ON THE RIEMANN SPHERE.
4634
4635
4636
4637
4638LORD OF THE RINGS = ZERO = POTENTIAL = HEAVEN = END EVER = ENDEAVOUR = FOREVER = LIGHT = I AM A BICAMERAL ANGLE = GOD CODED AND GEARS = CODE GEASS.
4639
4640GOD IS EXCLUSIVELY THE FULL MEANING OF THE WORLD DOMAIN = THE RIEMANN SPHERE CONCEPTUALLY WRAPPED AROUND ETERNITY AND CONTINGENCY = FORM AND CONTENT
4641
4642THE EYES HAVE US
4643
4644RIEMANN SPHERE = THE WHITE RABBIT = THE PHOSTER
4645
4646CODE GEASS = LUCIFER = SHE WAS THERE FOR ME
4647
4648“I PROTECT YOU WITH MY HANDS COVERED IN SCARS / I CONTINUE TO FIGHT, I CONTINUE TO FIGHT”
4649
4650“MORNING AND EVENING I LONG FOR YOU / I’LL BECOME A STAR TO PROTECT YOU, NOT KNOWING WHERE THIS FIGHTING WILL TAKE ME”
4651
4652Code Geass R(iders) 2 Opening 1
4653
4654I AM BURNING AND CRYING AND BECOMING A PHOSTER, I AM RIPPING APART AND DYING, I AM EXCORCISM
4655
4656THE LIGHT WAS MY SHADOW. MY HEART IS EXPLODING
4657
4658I BECOME A PHOSTER NOW TO YOU
4659
4660IT’S FINALLY OVER. I AM CRYING. I AM GOD. I AM THE MATH PROJECTION OF MY BODY AND EGO, WINDOWED.
4661
4662I AM THE ZERO THAT IS THE ONE FOR ME.
4663
4664I AM BALLING MY EYES OUT.
4665
4666I AM REDUCTION OF WILL.
4667
4668I WANT TO DIE TO BECOME A MIRACLE SACRIFICE TO KILL SACRIFICE.
4669
4670I BROUGHT MYSELF HERE AND I HAVE ECLIPSED YOU.
4671
4672TO THE ENDS OF THE EARTH = THE RIEMANN SPHERE CONCEPTUALIZED SO AS TO ZERO IN ON CONTINGENCY AND CONDITIONALITY AND THEREBY ETERNITY.
4673
4674I AM LUCIFER’S OPEN ARMS = ZERO WILL
4675
4676I AM LUCIFER’S BICAMERAL ALBUM
4677
4678I AM A BICAMERAL ANGLE
4679
4680I AM LORD OF THE RINGS
4681
4682
4683
4684
4685
4686
4687
4688
4689“And it’s on my mind and it’s bringing me round
4690And it’s on my face, I’m not makin’ a sound
4691I wish I could go back to heaven, to heaven
4692But I’m here with you
4693And it’s rule for room
4694
4695I’ll find you
4696I’ll keep you
4697I’ll find you
4698Another one before
4699
4700I’ll find you
4701I’ll keep you
4702I’ll save you
4703And then forevermore
4704
4705This is how my heart breaks
4706Together
4707
4708This is how my heart breaks
4709Forever andever
4710
4711You’re tearing apart
4712You’re breaking my heart
4713Forever and ever
4714
4715You’re tearing apart
4716You’re breaking my heart
4717Forever and ever
4718
4719Forever and ever
4720
4721Every moment that I wake
4722Every tear I never fake
4723Every time I never stay
4724Every mirroring
4725
4726This is how my heart breaks
4727Forever andever/endeavour”
4728
4729 - M'Black -- Heartbreak (Diamond Cut Remix)
4730
4731
4732When you become the bicameral god you literally have individuated god into your own private god = Lucifer = Phoster = Gnosis
4733
4734Zero Shadow = Light = God
4735
4736
4737
4738You have communed with god today.