KfDUSAg7

1I would like to inform you of my white paper, on the future, of software, as we know it.
2In and Around 1945, mathematician, and physicist, John Von Neumann, and others, working on a project detailing the EDVAC, ENIAC, and it’s operation, set the paradigm for our modern digital world.
3
4Most modern computer architecture from that point forward followed this basic design idea.
5
6  The fatal flaw, which is the very object of the solution that this paper covers, is the simple idea of the Von Neumann bottleneck, and in layman’s terms is the inability to have an instruction fetch, and perform data operation at the same time, or operate in a parallel capacity, based on the hardwares physical limitations.
7
8  The first problem, is to address whether a simple, elegant solution can be applied to all modern systems, and even the idea that legacy systems can not only be effected, but can be considered useful if the solution can be applied.
9
10  What is language? what, or who gives it meaning? 
11
12 To answer this we look not to the computer, or machine that the user uses ex-corporis, but internally to the brain,that drives the genetic machine that we call the body.
13
14  The language that we humans use cannot be used effectively by a computer, because of binary principle.
15
16  What the casual reader of this paper may not know, is that this language, while designed before the writer of this papers time, constitutes a library of subjects, and objects.
17
18  When I use the word table perhaps a wooden object comes to mind, or perhaps an array?  Whatever the idea, the object being referred to by the subject is stored, and completed in a parallel fashion faster than thought itself.
19
20  The real problem is not the Von Neumann bottleneck, but the speed, and efficacy of the user in inputting the information in a simple, and intuitive way that will translate into binary patterns that can be stored, written, retrieved, and re-arranged at a speed that the user finds comparable to actual thought, as well as the creation of a set of subject/object oriented patterns that the hardware can use to accomplish this task.
21
22  To create this illusion, and to allow it to interface in a way that is comfortable to the users liking, and in even a very basic form reflects the user, is based on 1: the hardware, and 2: the user.  
23
24This is the encryption itself.
25
26  Say the user has an older smartphone, the limitations of the hardware only allow the software to adjust to the user based on the physical specifications of the system that it’s installed on.
27
28  The other half of the encryption is the users own input, just as the idea of the bio-metric identification system makes identity possible, so too does the comparison between the user and the softwares interface with the hardware.
29
30  The users are human, and they change over time, so it makes sense that we would want a constantly rotating key that allows anonymity, and extra digital protection.
31
32  In order to break the encryption they would need the physical phone, and a way to physically replicate the user, and their personal usage patterns, more secure than a fingerprint. Even if our proposed software were to be reverse engineered, once installed, it is indivisible, and the encryption entirely unique to the "hardware state" of the device. Meaning that having the software without the hardware it is impossible to guess, or determine the key, and even if you have the hardware, it imprints, and begins a sequence that becomes the key, as the use alters this it is still impossible to guess the key, how would you recreate that environment, like trying to recreate that first kiss.
33
34  To do that, you would need to know the user, and also know their location, which the software makes impossible with encryption.
35
36  Things like habits, location, family, and others will be taken into account, as this is the physical input to the device.
37
38          Let us say that the users device becomes stolen property, it will be easily traceable, and recoverable, as the design of the software is so that the imprint is made before the software can be fully used.
39
40  This makes theft worthless, and reuse of stolen devices impossible, except by the user/s assiged to them.
41
42  The idea is that the softwares evolution is the information that is recursively placed into the rotating encryption that is active, in real time, which is the very software actively managing all systems above it, from the hardware level.
43
44  The old patterns are replaced with new ones, as the device is used in new ways, and it receives input from the user.
45
46  The software cannot take over the world, and cannot perform tasks that require human action, nor can it even conceive that humans even exist.
47
48 The best way to describe it is that it is like a mirror, you get out what you put in, if the casual user put in the grocery list they will get back a grocery list, but if the user creates anything it will reflect the creative flair of the user in its every essence.
49
50  The limits are the imagination of the user, and clever users will take full advantage of their equipment by using their hardware to better learn about their device, and unlock the full features of the user themself.
51
52  Let me be clear, in it’s infancy, just as our children must learn to become intelligent, the software itself is not super-intelligent, and cannot be so, it will take time, and various inputs to make it truly indistinguishable from human intelligence.
53
54  
55
56  
57
58  
59
60  # Chaos Computing WhitePaper
61
62#whitepapers/mimocs
63
64
65By calculating the pattern in primes algorithmic sets, and subsets, a new method of computational analysis has been devised by <insert name>.
66
67 I WANT THIS TO BE THE FIRST LETTER OF THE LAST NAMES OF THE GREATEST CONTRIBUTORS OF COMPUTING, WE CAN THEN CREATE A FIRST, MIDDLE, AND LAST NAME OF A PSEUDO "PEN NAME" FOR THE CREATOR/S, THAT HIDES THE ACTUAL IDENTITY OF THOSE WHO WORKED TIRELESSLY TO IMPROVE MANKINDS CONDITION THROUGH IMAGINITIVE CREATION.
68
69  This algorithm leverages thermodynamic and electrical properties that occur in existing hardware to temporarily alter the BIOS/UEFI [Basic Input Output System] with NIMOS [No Input - Multi Output System].
70
71
72NIMOS allows for the creation of unique machine ‘fingerprinting’ which we can more accurately call motherboard state.  Motherboard state is a completely unique in time and space hash creator, which for cryptographic purposes, becomes a unique private key generator.  The keys are technically, virtually, and physically impossible to recreate…ever, even by the same machine, user, and sub-software.
73
74
75Private and public keys are gleaned from machine state.  Private keys can be password encrypted or otherwise secured by the owner.
76
77
78Problem
79
80
811. Encryption : this doesn’t provide an easy way for users to sign transactions 
82
83
84It does, but the way we think about traditional encryption does not allow for intuitive understanding of it this way. Imagine a flea on a rat, travelling along the silk road to presumably spread the bubonic plague, would it be possible for humans to track, the disease? Or guess the name of the rat that originated it? It seems absurd to compare the two things, but the rat is carrying discreet information through markets, nearby people, and the fleas it carries are also unnoticed, and arbitrary, except to other rats.  The rats are like the keys, genetically similar, but very different, the same kind of encryption allows the multichain to effectively solve this problem.
85
86
872. In a ‘trustless’ network, you must trust that the network is inherently ‘good’ - 50% good.  What it if it decides to get rich quick? Or worse, slow and steady wins the race…especially when detection comes into play?  Anon networks are scary.
88
89
90Virtue tokens are the answer, half of the network “becomes” trusted, and the other half is untrusted. The trusted members are legitimate unanimous entities, of one variety, and the anonymous are the other side, like how a black market exists today. The nature of this is that elicit activity will not be trusted, and will expose itself.
91
92
93 How long can this last?  Will cryptography be broken? 
94
95
96 *I don’t know, perhaps, probably not, don’t worry’* since there are many problems that have yet to be solved, even by conventional computers or even supercomputers, this isn't generally a concern with hardware state encryption.
97
98
99What is trust, and how can it possibly be based on time?
100
101Trust, IS HOPE!  or confident expectation of something, strength, or integrity, from the latin meaning whole, or complete.  The software is designed based on math that is known, this means that the timing of nested processes, is independent of clock cycle, and can seem to nullify time, but once again, this is mere illusion.  What is really happening is a kind of regulated time sharing/multiplexing behavior, and is also in synchronization with timing, but in an unconventional way.
102
103
104
1053. We provide micro-trust based encryption.
106
107  Promises are based on human connection.
108
109  You must be known, at least to a few people who collectively maintain trust with other collective trusts through agreed links.
110
111    In this way, mining is much more cost effective, and will forever change digital currency exchange, and finance and gaming..... well any human based action can be ethically, and equitably be forever changed by this concept.
112
113      Approving a transaction is built in, and inherent, applies to parent, and child objects/subjects
114
115
1164. Signature based encryption - human hand signed transactions, like biometric information that the user themselves finds useful, or meaningful, this applies to many things, like emojis, or even custom art or music, can become a passcode/signature.
117
118
1195. The impossibility of mathematical solution brings up an interesting problems.
120
121Data Unions are the solution to trust, and allow trusted users to intuitively trust other users on trusted networks, and avoid, if they like, the untrusted users and networks altogether
122
123
124
125Solutions
126
127There are two more problems with cryptocurrency that we can solve by replacing a layer of abstraction…the BIOS with MIMOCS.
128
129 MIMOCS uses the same principles that allow NIMOS to work in order to exponentially increase performance and decrease energy consumption on the motherboard.
130
131   This will allow even older systems to see a use, as the unique, and sometimes outmoded features of specific architectures will see unusual performance gains.  While this seems arbitrary, it helps us to alleviate waste by giving legacy hardware a new set of legs, as a way to backup newer systems, that will be ever increasingly on the cloud.  Not the final, but for this papers end, is the unique relationship that this holds, for the future of quantum computing, it will allow computers and associated supercomputing networks, to fully interface and realize the power of a quantum computer, and all that it can offer science, medicine, and mankind.
132
133Thank you for your time,
134
135#anon20204president
136Enjoy