BPSeGZqa

1NUCLEAR BOMBSHELL- ISRAEL NUKED NEW YORK CITY ON 911
2
3https://www.mediafire.com/?hgh13bxgbxztrbl
4
5
6
7NUCLEAR BOMBSHELL! “Stunning” Radiation Spike Allegedly Detected at Israeli NY Consulate.
8April 19, 2015 James Robertson 911, Cover up, false flag, Zionism911, DOE, Israel, New York
9 The North Tower Demolition, September 11th, 2001.
10April 19th, 2015.
11In August 2005, the New York Police Department and technicians from the US Department of Energy conducted an Aerial Radiation Survey of all five New York boroughs.The survey required 100 flight hours, cost $800,000 and identified 80 radiation hotspots in the five New York boroughs. One finding, that the Great Kills park area of Staten Island was contaminated with Radium 9.,an element believed to be connected with bone cancer led to the closure of an area of the park.The majority of the hotspots were connected to the illegal dumping of medical and radiological waste.
12GAO-06-1015 Combating Nuclear Terrorism: Federal Efforts to Respond to Nuclear and Radiological Threats and to Protect Emergency Response Capabilities Could Be Strengthened – 251591.pdf
13http://www.gao.gov/assets/260/251591.pdf
14 Diagram shows the technique used to survey New York.
15This quote from the US Government Accountability Office describes how it was done.
16“ One of DOE’s unique capabilities is the ability to conduct aerial background radiation surveys. These surveys are conducted by using helicopters or planes equipped with radiation detectors to fly over an area and collect information on existing background radiation sources, such as granite statues in a city or medical isotopes located at hospitals. This can help DOE establish baseline radiation levels against which future radiation levels can be compared in order to more easily detect new radiation sources that may pose a security or public health threat. DOE is not the only federal agency responsible for detecting nuclear and radiological materials.”
17The purpose of the survey was principally to provide a background radiation map of New York so that future surveys could then identify any “extra” radiation signals and therefore prevent any future Nuclear terrorist attack on the city.
18In September 2006, the GAO released their report, which found that the mapping techniques were effective and that the process should be extended across the US.
19In October 2006, an article was printed in the Cleveland Indy Media that claimed.
20ISRAELI EMBASSY IN NYC A RADIATION HOT SPOT : Cleveland IMC (((I)))
21http://cleveland.indymedia.org/news/2006/10/22798.php
22“One alleged radiation hot spot on Manhattan’s east side has the potential for becoming a political hot spot: A strong radiation spike from the area of the Israeli Embassy. Officials would not comment on why they thought that particular area allegedly showed such a stunning peak in radiation.”
23There are other articles that mention this, including this Rense article,
24Israeli NYC Embassy A Radiation Hot Spot?
25http://www.rense.com/general75/hotspot.htm
26 Nuclear Chemical and Biological Protection Suits at Ground Zero.
27The Rense article is itself based on the Cleveland Indy Media story. The Cleveland story makes a small error in that it refers to the Israeli Embassy, there is no Israeli Embassy in New York, the Embassy is in Washington DC, but Israel has a Diplomatic Consulate in New York, along with it’s UN mission based there There are also Israeli Consulate Generals in Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Houston, Miami, Philadelphia and San Francisco.
28The rest of the story reads like a conventional news story and even the radiation spike, the claim is treated very lightly and quickly passed over.
29It is a single source story, as the GAO does not list the hotspot sites although it seems that a graph originally accompanied the story showing the hot spot areas, the graph has disappeared very soon after the report was released.
30It is still an extremely interesting story because it does tend to corroborate a number of claims made about the way the 911 atrocity was conducted.
31 The Five Israelis Arrested in New Jersey on 911.
32911-Israeli Foreknowledge is Proven by at Least Two Different Pieces of Evidence.
33In fairness it should be acknowledged that foreknowledge of 911 was surprisingly widespread. Different people exhibited different degrees of knowledge.
34It can be inferred for example that elements of the US financial services industry had foreknowledge of the fact that something was going to happen involving passenger aircraft due to the massive surge in the “Shorting”, betting against the price of the stocks of United and American Airlines and only those two airlines. The two airlines “used” in the 911 operation.
35As this quote from “Insider Trading and 911 the Facts laid bare” by Lars Schall elucidates.
36“The atypical volumes, which are very rare for specific stocks lead to the suspicion of insider trading.” Six years after the attacks on the World Trade Center this is the disturbing results of a recent study by Marc Chesney and Loriano Mancini, professors at the University of Zurich. The authors, one of them a specialist in derivative products, the other a specialist in econometrics, worked on the sales options that were used to speculate on the decline in the prices of 20 large American companies, particularly in the aerospace and financial sector.”
37“Their analysis refers to the execution of transactions between the 6th and 10th of September 2001 compared to the average volumes, which were collected over a long period (10 years for most of the companies). In addition, the two specialists calculated the probability that different options within the same sector in significant volumes would be traded within a few days. “We have tried to see if the movements of specific stocks shortly before the attacks were normal.” We show that the movements for certain companies such as American Airlines, United Airlines, Merrill Lynch, Bank of America, Citigroup, Marsh & McLehnan are rare from a statistical point of view, especially when compared to the quantities that have been observed for other assets like Coca-Cola or HP,” explains Marc Chesney, a former Professor at the HEC and co-author of Blanchiment et financement du terrorisme (Money laundering and financing of terrorism), published by Editions Ellipses. “For example1,535 put option contracts on American Airlines with a strike of $30 and expiry in October 2001 were traded on September 10th, in contrast to a daily average of around 24 contracts over the previous three weeks. The fact that the market was currently in a bear market is not sufficient to explain these surprising volumes.”
38“The authors also examined the profitability of the put options and trades for an investor who acquired such a product between the 6th and 10th September. “For specific titles, the profits were enormous.” “For example, the investors who acquired put options on Citigroup with an expiry in October 2001 could have made more than $15 million profit,” he said. On the basis of the connection of data between volumes and profitability, the two authors conclude that “the probability that crimes by Insiders (Insider trading) occurred , is very strong in the cases of American Airlines, United Airlines, Merrill Lynch, Bank of America, Citigroup and JP Morgan. “There is no legal evidence, but these are the results of statistical methods, confirming the signs of irregularities.”
39“In a new version of their study that was published on September 7, 2011, the authors stuck to their findings from April 2010. They added the emphasis that in no way the profits gained with the put options to which they point could have been achieved due to sheer fortunate coincidence, but that in fact they were based on prior knowledge which had been exploited.”
40So it can be inferred foreknowledge of an attack involving these specific carriers but there is no sign that there was foreknowledge of the actual targets, the exact time or any of those other details.
41These elements of the US financial services industry, trading in Chicago and New York, may have had total foreknowledge, but all that can be reasonably inferred from their actions is that they knew something would happen and these carriers would be affected.
42That is a fairly compelling, but rather low level of foreknowledge.
43If the foreknowledge of the five “Dancing Israelis” is examined by contrast, the knowledge appears to be far more detailed.
44 This is a photo of the the Van the Dancing Israelis were in when arrested.
45The Dancing Israelis, arrested on September 11th, appear to know the specific target buildings and the exact timing of the attack to within hours at the least.
46The Dancing Israelis were observed filming the “aircraft strikes” on the World Trade Centre from the top of a building that required them to drive for ten minutes after learning of the attacks. The building the Dancing Israelis worked “Urban Moving Systems” had a good view of the North Tower, the first tower attacked but a poor view of the South tower.
47The Dancing Israelis had no reason to travel unless they knew the other tower would be hit and needed to view that, and they are alleged to have arrived at their filming post within minutes of the first attack according to one eyewitness,
48The Israelis were celebrating and filmed themselves with the burning towers in the background.
49When arrested the Dancing Israelis did not offer a credible or honest account of their movements on the morning, When the five Israeli terrorists were removed from their van, they helpfully explained the purpose of the attacks and the mindset behind them also. “We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems, the Palestinians are the problem.” also, apropos of nothing, as leaving the vehicle, “We were on the West Side Highway at the time of the incident.” an unprompted and dishonest attempt to create an alibi, In the afternoon there were five members of the group in the van, in the morning, the witnesses had seen only three.
50Odigo Message the Other Indicator of Israeli Foreknowledge.
51It is also worth remembering the other solid example of foreknowledge in Israel, the Odigo messaging service warning sent out in Hebrew in the hours before the attack. This was not a Jewish warning in the slightest, everyday Jewish people were in the same category as anyone else, there was a small scale warning sent out to certain Israelis prior to the attacks. The warning referred to an incident that day in New York, the foreknowledge was not detailed. It is also completely unclear who sent the warning beyond the fact that it was a user of that messaging service based in Israel but sent out to members, almost all Israeli, across the world..
52There were many other better examples of foreknowledge than the Odigo example. There was one story told by a man named Randy Glass of meeting with a Pakistani arms dealer connected to the Pakistani intelligence outfit the ISI (Inter Services intelligence) who stated during a meal in a restaurant more than two years prior to the attacks. “ those towers, will soon be gone”” or words to that effect. There is no suggestion the man was involved, but he knew it was going to happen and the target.
53 The North Tower Demolition, September 11th, 2001.
54The foreknowledge of the Dancing Israelis extends into probable involvement in the attack.
55There have been many allegations made about the use of Nuclear weapons, small nuclear weapons in the demolition of the World Trade Center. Wayne Madsen wrote that 911 was a nuclear event several years ago. Veteran’s Today editor Gordon Duff has repeatedly claimed that Israel smuggled nuclear weapons into New York City prior to the attack and that the weapons were hidden in the Israeli New York Consulate. Gordon Duff has also repeatedly claimed that Israeli intelligence officers placed small nuclear weapons in vehicles in the car park of certain WTC buildings prior to the attack. Duff also claims to have a copy of a secret US government report by the Department of Energy into the fact that 911 was a nuclear attack.. The narrative presented corroborates all the known facts although the specific details cannot be confirmed due to the fact that it is a single source story . The details are so corroborative as to make the account compelling nonetheless.
56It is possible that the 2005 Radiation survey was actually a sly attempt to gather intelligence on 911 and that the radiation spike at the Israeli Consulate building, which is just a large office space rented to numerous businesses and other organisations may have been due to the residual radiation that the weapons stored there prior to the attack. left behind or it could indicate a Samson option type of scenario.
57It actually seems like a rather cute coincidence that the one city that the DOE surveyed was also the one city that people within the DOE apparently conclude was attacked with Nuclear weapons on September 11thso the probability must be that they were intent on collecting evidence relating to the 911 atrocity and overall it is becoming increasingly obvious that the attack was conducted in large part by the agents and assets of Israeli intelligence, Although it remains unclear what specific entity gave the instructions to these officers.
58The Proven 9/11 Foreknowledge of Israel’s Agents
59Sources.
60kenny’s sideshow: The Dancing Israelis Docs
61http://kennysideshow.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/the-dancing-israelis-docs_4.html
62police.pdf
63https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/103113259/police.pdf
64HighView Page – 62392807-dancing-israelis-fbi-document-section-1-1138796-001-303a-nk-105536-section-1-944861.pdf
65https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/103113259/62392807-dancing-israelis-fbi-document-section-1-1138796-001-303a-nk-105536-section-1-944861.pdf
66HighView Page – 62393381-dancing-israelis-fbi-document-section-2-1138796-001-303a-nk-105536-section-2-944876.pdf
67https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/103113259/62393381-dancing-israelis-fbi-document-section-2-1138796-001-303a-nk-105536-section-2-944876.pdf
68HighView Page – 62394063-Dancing-Israelis-FBI-document-Section-3-1138796-001-303A-NK-105536-Section-3-944880.pdf
69https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/103113259/62394063-Dancing-Israelis-FBI-document-Section-3-1138796-001-303A-NK-105536-Section-3-944880.pdf
70HighView Page – 62394178-dancing-israelis-fbi-document-section-4-1138796-001-303a-nk-105536-section-4-944881.pdf
71https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/103113259/62394178-dancing-israelis-fbi-document-section-4-1138796-001-303a-nk-105536-section-4-944881.pdf
72HighView Page – 62829048-dancing-israelis-fbi-document-section-5-62394321-1138796-001-303a-nk-105536-section-5-944891.pdf
73https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/103113259/62829048-dancing-israelis-fbi-document-section-5-62394321-1138796-001-303a-nk-105536-section-5-944891.pdf
74HighView Page – 62394765-Related-article-at-http-tinyurl-com-FBI-Dancing-Israelis-Dancing-Israelis-FBI-document-Section-6-1138796-001-303A-NK-105536-Section-6.pdf
75https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/103113259/62394765-Related-article-at-http-tinyurl-com-FBI-Dancing-Israelis-Dancing-Israelis-FBI-document-Section-6-1138796-001-303A-NK-105536-Section-6.pdf
76Odigo says workers were warned of attack – Israel News | Haaretz
77http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/odigo-says-workers-were-warned-of-attack-1.70579
78RE-INVESTIGATING 9/11… THE ‘5 DANCING ISRAELIS’ AND OTHER MOSSAD ACTIVITY | shirlz007
79http://shirlz007.com/2014/08/20/re-investigating-911-the-5-dancing-israelis-and-other-mossad-activity/
80The Insider – The Israelis who were warned hours before 9/11
81http://www.theinsider.org/news/article.asp?id=520
82Complete 911 Timeline: Randy Glass and Operation Diamondback
83http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&projects_and_programs=randyGlass
84Mapping 9/11: The Fort Lee Mystery | Veterans Today
85http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/01/09/mapping-911-fort-lee/
86Rainbow in the Dark: Powerful Proof of 9/11 Nukes | Donald Fox
87https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2015/02/06/rainbow-in-the-dark-powerful-proof-of-911-nukes/
889/11 Attacks: Criminal Foreknowledge and Insider Trading lead directly to the CIA’s Highest Ranks | Global Research – Centre for Research on Globalization
89http://www.globalresearch.ca/9-11-attacks-criminal-foreknowledge-and-insider-trading-lead-directly-to-the-cia-s-highest-ranks/32323
90Complete 911 Timeline: Insider Trading and Other Foreknowledge
91http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?before_9/11=insidertrading&timeline=complete_911_timeline
92SEC: Government Destroyed Documents Regarding Pre-9/11 Put Options Washington’s Blog
93http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/06/sec-government-destroyed-documents-regarding-pre-911-put-options.html
94Second Avenue (Manhattan) – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
95http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Avenue_(Manhattan)
96http://crimesofempire.com/2015/04/19/nuclear-bombshell-stunning-radiation-spike-allegedly-detected-at-israeli-ny-consulate/
97
98
99
100 	
101Cleveland Indy Media Center
102
103
104printable version - email this article
105
106ISRAELI EMBASSY IN NYC  A RADIATION HOT SPOT
107by x Saturday, Oct. 14, 2006 at 1:05 PM
108Feds surveyed NYC for radiation, found tainted park, Embassy
109
110WASHINGTON -- Anti-terrorism officials conducted a helicopter survey of New York City's radiation sources in preparation for a so-called "dirty bomb" attack - and discovered a Staten Island park with dangerously high levels of radium, a new report found. 
111
112Federal authorities found 80 unexpected "hot spots" around New York City, according to the Government Accountability Office, the 
113investigative arm of Congress. 
114
115The GAO report released Thursday details a previously undisclosed aerial anti-terrorism program in New York City, one which may be extended to other cities worried about the possible release of radioactive material by terrorists. 
116
117The report does not identify which city park had the contaminated soil, but NYPD officials said it was in Gateway National Park in Staten Island. The site was closed, and New York has requested federal money to do a citywide aerial survey every year to update the information. 
118
119By creating a map of the city's radiation sources, city officials hope to be able to respond more quickly in the event of a dirty bomb attack, know exactly which streets are contaminated and get civilians away. 
120
121New York is the first and only U.S. city to conduct a complete aerial radiological survey, having paid the U.S. Department of Energy $800,000 for the 2005 study. 
122
123The helicopters picked up sources of low-level radiation from expected places, like granite statues and medical isotopes at hospitals, but it also found dozens of other sources of unexpected radioactivity, the GAO report found. 
124
125"NYPD officials indicated that the survey was tremendously valuable because it identified more than 80 locations with radiological sources that required further investigation to determine their risk," the report said. 
126
127At the Staten Island park, sensors detected large quantities of radium in the soil. Long-term exposure to radium increases the risk of 
128developing lymphoma, bone cancer and leukemia. 
129
130National Park Service spokesman Brian Feeney said the area is a one-acre piece of the 570-acre Great Kills Park, which is part of the larger Gateway park. 
131
132Feeney said experts assured them after the August 2005 study that the area posed no public health risk, and said visitors do not go into that area anyway because of dense vegetation. He did not know if any warnings had been placed around the site. 
133
134The radiation apparently comes from "some piece of industrial equipment, pieces of old rusty metal. Whatever this equipment used to do, it picked up radioactivity," he said. 
135
136"We keep people out of that area. It's a non-accessible area of the park, no one can get in there," said Feeney. "There's no health hazard now, there was never a health hazard to the public." 
137
138He said the agency has applied to the Department of Energy for funding to further survey the site. 
139
140Staten Island's congressman, Rep. Vito Fossella, said the contamination was a surprise to him and residents near the park, and he demanded more information. 
141
142"It is essential for the government to act immediately to fully understand the extent of the contamination," said Fossella, who was 
143trying to arrange a meeting Friday with federal and city officials to discuss further testing and possible removal of the contaminated soil. 
144
145One alleged radiation hot spot on Manhattan's east side has the potential for becoming a political hot spot: A strong radiation spike 
146from the area of the Israeli Embassy. Officials would not comment on why they thought that particular area allegedly showed such a stunning peak in radiation. 
147
148The aerial survey is designed to help local officials react more quickly in the event of terrorists detonating a "dirty bomb" that releases 
149radioactive material into the air. With the survey, police may be able to pinpoint the exact source of radiation by comparing new readings to their pre-existing "radiation map" of the area. 
150
151NYPD spokesman Paul Browne said the department wanted a record of the city's naturally occurring and other "radiological signatures" to compare with periodic readings it does to detect for dirty bombs or other nuclear devices. 
152
153"It gives us a baseline so we can pick up any anomalies," he said. 
154
155New York City is the only major city to conduct a full-scale Aerial Background Radiation Survey to identify "hot spots," though such work has been done in the nation's capitol, according to the report. 
156
157The GAO found neither the Department of Energy nor the Department of Homeland Security believe they are required to conduct such radiation mapping, though the investigators said there were "significant benefits" to surveys in other urban areas. 
158
159Homeland Security officials agreed that they should study the cost and effectiveness of expanded radiation mapping in additional cities. 
160
161Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., called the report further proof the federal government is not doing enough to help cities guard against 
162terrorism. 
163
164The hot spot mapping initiative "should also be shared with cities across the country, not mothballed because the Homeland Security 
165Department doesn't want to put up the money," Schumer said. 
166
167The GAO report also found the Department of Energy may need to beef up security at Nellis Air Force Base in Nevada and Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland because those sites hold key national assets for responding to a radiological or nuclear attack. 
168
169Specialized quick-response teams and equipment are concentrated at those two sites, and a successful attack against either could leave one section of the country with limited capacity to respond to a subsequent strike with radioactive weapons, the GAO said. 
170
171The agency's associate administrator, Michael C. Kane, was adamant the sites are safe. 
172
173"We categorically reject the contention that physical security at two of our facilities may not be sufficient for protecting against terrorist 
174attacks," Kane wrote.>> 
175
176add your comments
177LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
178Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 28 posted about this article.
179These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
180TITLE	AUTHOR	DATE
181Its a truth optional world for some
182Tia	Wednesday, Apr. 18, 2007 at 10:29 PM
183Thats because...fake article
184Thats because...fake article	Monday, Apr. 16, 2007 at 4:14 PM
185The True Enemy Within
186laobao	Friday, Apr. 13, 2007 at 10:06 AM
187Another forgery, indymedia style
188Tia	Friday, Feb. 23, 2007 at 10:44 AM
189it endangers so much more
190fever	Sunday, Feb. 11, 2007 at 6:47 PM
191Publish the map
192Rev Pope	Sunday, Feb. 11, 2007 at 10:24 AM
193FumbDuck
194FumbDuck	Friday, Feb. 09, 2007 at 7:43 PM
195How to verify
196Cole Dane	Friday, Feb. 09, 2007 at 1:14 PM
197Yes
198Rasputin	Thursday, Feb. 08, 2007 at 4:16 PM
199Nukes of Hazzard
200Jeh	Thursday, Feb. 08, 2007 at 8:01 AM
201
202
203NUCLEAR FALSE FLAG ATTACK
204by PISSEDOFFPATRIOT Monday, Feb. 05, 2007 at 12:20 PM
205Since we have not been driven to attack Iran yet the Zionists are preparing the next false flag attack with a 'dirty bomb' that has been touted as the 'next terrorist attack' for a while in order to scare us all into total submission. Mossad KNEW about 9/11 in advance, even filmed it happening; they KNEW about the London bombings in advance and I bet there will be the telltale signs of Zionist foreknowledge with the next attack. By that I mean follow the Israelis and the money. The thing is since we supplied Israel with nuclear material and 'helped' them with their program they have to be sure to get material that will be traced back to Iran so the blame can be pointed there.
206C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Desktop\ZIONISTS\ISRAELI EMBASSY IN N...
207add your comments
208
209
210GET READY...
211by Kimmer Monday, Feb. 05, 2007 at 12:30 PM
212for another zionist false flag attack. 
213Most people won't be so gullible 
214the second time around.
215add your comments
216
217
218Great Kills Contamination
219by John McCarthy Monday, Feb. 05, 2007 at 12:51 PM
220vpocv@hotmail.com 310 397 1143
221Perhaps a boy scout is old enough to get a merit badge for solving this not so difficult problem of contamination at Great Kills Park. 
222The Park was chosen for the temporary storage of the steel from the WTC buildings collapsed on 911. 
223There is great potential that the WTC buildings were collapsed with nuclear and non-nuclear demolitions. 
224The only way to determine the validity of such a potential is to gather the necessary equipment and have an independent survey of the area in question. 
225Reluctance on the part of any official for such testing will also be telling!
226johnmccarthy90066.tripod.com
227add your comments
228
229
230Dirty bombs are not a threat
231by rfugger Monday, Feb. 05, 2007 at 3:56 PM
232Not mentioned in the article is the fact that the small amount of radiation a dirty bomb would create is hardly a threat to human health: 
233
234"A test explosion and subsequent calculations done by the United States Department of Energy found that assuming nothing is done to clean up the affected area and everyone stays in the affected area for one year, the radiation exposure would be "fairly high", but not fatal." 
235(source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirty_bomb) 
236
237As such, evacuation plans in case of a dirty bomb attack are misguided at best.
238add your comments
239
240
241aerial surveillance
242by Liz Tuesday, Feb. 06, 2007 at 1:39 AM
243earthlady@hotmail.com 8037901302 Columbia SC
244In Columbia SC we have aerial surveillance that has been going on for almost two years. It would be sad to know we have been flown over and flown over but not searched for radiation. It would be sad to know they fly aircraft to monitor our behavior or intimidate us but not really establish hot spots or potential problems. There are days when I am buzzed by aircraft every 10 minutes. They fly at less than 100 feet in downtown Columbia SC- the capital of the state. Many of these aircraft are without numbers and letters and the FAA states they do not know who it is, and the local airfield cannot contact these small planes the government sends up to fly around our city all day every day. How much does it cost and who is paying and what are they doing up there. According to your article, they are not monitoring radiation, why not?
245add your comments
246
247
248LInks Required!
249by BlueBerry Pick'n Wednesday, Feb. 07, 2007 at 6:24 AM
250BlueBerry.Pickn@gmail.com Toronto, Ontario, Canada
251You know, a link to the GAO, or an off-gov't copy of the report, would be very helpful & increase credibility... because its a horrifying thought... just sickening... There is a good reason religion & politics should be kept separate... because Israel, Zionism, Jewish religion & spirituality are all SEPARATE concepts & entities. Many people will be confused by this, as some of the previous comments suggest. Its heartbreaking that this could be deeply misunderstood by the Public as the information only TRICKLES into the miasma of hatred that permeates 'International' current events... Spread Love... ... but wear the Glove! BlueBerry Pick'n can be found @ ThisCanadian "Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
252www.ThisCanadian.com
253add your comments
254
255
256Oh For Lans Sakes
257by CanuckCookie Wednesday, Feb. 07, 2007 at 4:14 PM
258molly.me2wonder@gmail.com
259Here is the part your looking for BlueBerryPick'n. 
260"First, NYPD officials said that in the course of conducting the survey, they identified over 80 locations with unexplained radiological sources. Teams of NYPD officers accompanied by DOE scientists and technicians investigated each of these hot spots and determined whether they posed a danger to the public. While most of these were medical isotopes located at medical facilities and hospitals, according to NYPD officials, awareness of these locations will allow them to distinguish false alarms from real radiological threats and locate a radiological device more quickly. Second, NYPD officers are now trained in investigating hot spots and they have real-life experience in locating radiological sources. Third, NYPD officials now have a baseline radiological survey of the city to assist with cleanup efforts in the event of a radiological release." 
261
262From the report here: http://cryptome.org/gao-06-1015.htm 
263
264Not a word about Israel Embassy as you can see. Although this statement is interesting from a different link: 
265
266"The Hill, an area of the Fresh Kills landfill connected to the recovery effort, is soon to shut down. The operation, "created in the genius of desperation, has sorted through 1.6 million tons of material removed from the World Trade Center disaster site. That work has uncovered more than 4,100 body parts, helping to identify more than 150 victims. Now, there are only 25,000 tons to be carted to the landfill from Lower Manhattan, a small fraction of what was. In the next few weeks their mission will be completed, their future certain only to the extent that it will be nothing like what they have just gone through." (New York Times)" 
267
268http://www.gothamgazette.com/rebuilding_nyc/topics/groundzero/cleanup.shtml 
269
270Sheesh people!
271add your comments
272
273
274Oops Forgot
275by CanuckCookie Wednesday, Feb. 07, 2007 at 4:24 PM
276molly.me2wonder@gmail.com
277Sorry I didn't qualify why I thought the above statement was interesting. Because it also states in the GAO Report: 
278
279"One of the over 80 locations with a radiological signature was a local park that was once the site of an industrial plant. According to NYPD officials, the survey disclosed that the soil there was contaminated by large quantities of radium.9 Brush fires in the area posed an imminent threat to public health because traditional fire mitigation tactics of pushing flammable debris into the middle of the park could release radiological contamination into the air. Investigating locations with unexplained radiological sources identified by the aerial background radiation survey alerted NYPD officials to this threat, and they were able to prevent public exposure to the material." 
280
281The Park - see above.
282add your comments
283
284
285Nukes of Hazzard
286by Jeh Thursday, Feb. 08, 2007 at 8:01 AM
287Wait, are we sure Israel even has nuclear material.
288add your comments
289
290
291Yes
292by Rasputin Thursday, Feb. 08, 2007 at 4:16 PM
293offwhite33@hotmail.com
294yes, we know Isreil has fissile matierial. This doesnt mean what is there is fissile.
295add your comments
296
297
298How to verify
299by Cole Dane Friday, Feb. 09, 2007 at 1:14 PM
300cole644@yahoo.com
301Is there anyway we can verify this story, any one we can write or call? Was Indymedia the first to break this story?
302add your comments
303
304
305FumbDuck
306by FumbDuck Friday, Feb. 09, 2007 at 7:43 PM
307FumbDuck@WhiteHouse.Gov
308Calling Bush an Asshole is wrong. 
309An Asshole serves a useful purpose.
310add your comments
311
312
313Publish the map
314by Rev Pope Sunday, Feb. 11, 2007 at 10:24 AM
315If a dirty bomb attack happens, be sure to re-survey that radiation spike. It may suddenly be gone.
316add your comments
317
318
319it endangers so much more
320by fever Sunday, Feb. 11, 2007 at 6:47 PM
321Wouldn't it be something if the klan or Arean Nations were to raid the embassie and got thier hands on a nuke? 
322
323What? If the Zionists detonated the nuke, the klan / AN would loose a few dozen men, but what they call Jew York City would be gone, the American economy would no longer be able to aid Zionist offenses, and noone would know that it was the klan / AN that attacked the embassie or that the embassie was even attacked. All that would be known is that the nuke explosion had its ground zero at the embassie. 
324
325Or even a palestinian group. They would have even less to loose, and so much more to gain.
326add your comments
327
328
329Another forgery, indymedia style
330by Tia Friday, Feb. 23, 2007 at 10:44 AM
331This article made it into all the mainstream news sources except for one paragraph that was added at a later date. Its long since been discredited. 
332Any guess as to the paragraph that was recently inserted? 
333To their credit, this has been deleted by most of the IMC's that originally published it. Cleveland- its your turn! 
334
335One clue of the forged nature of this paragraph is the lack of compliance to standard rules of grammar: 
336
337"One alleged radiation hot spot on Manhattan's east side has the potential for becoming a political hot spot: A strong radiation spike from the area of the Israeli Embassy. Officials would not comment on why 
338they thought that particular area allegedly showed such a stunning peak in radiation" 
339
340Here's a mainstream media version of the same story: 
341http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/454825p-382701c.html 
342
343Whats missing, children? 
344
345
346add your comments
347
348
349The True Enemy Within
350by laobao Friday, Apr. 13, 2007 at 10:06 AM
351Research "The Samson Option" and you will know why Israel is the greatest threat on the planet. 
352
353Hot spot at the Israeli embassy and the zionist Main Stream Media does a complete stand down. 
354
355We got to take away their licenses and deport them to the country of the other passport they carry.
356add your comments
357
358
359Thats because...fake article
360by Thats because...fake article Monday, Apr. 16, 2007 at 4:14 PM
361Thats because a fake paragraph re: the Israeli Embassy was inserted into an actual article. Check the source. Typical anti-zionist fraud. It happens all the time.
362add your comments
363
364
365Its a truth optional world for some
366by Tia Wednesday, Apr. 18, 2007 at 10:29 PM
367"Typical anti-zionist fraud. It happens all the time." 
368
369Unfortunately, that is true. 
370There are assorted quotes that circulate around the IMC's- they are supposed to reveal the racist nature of Israel- trouble is, they are all fake. 
371
372It pays to check. 
373
374This Einstein "quote" has been making the rounds. 
375
376"Anti-Semitism is nothing but the antagonistic attitude produced in the non-Jew by the Jewish group. The Jewish group has thrived on oppression and on the antagonism it has forever met in the world... the root cause is their 
377use of enemies they create in order to keep solidarity..." 
378
379Its no surprise that this end up on places like "whitefreespeech.com", rense, etc. 
380
381What Einstein really said was "The formation of groups has an invigorating effect in all spheres of human striving, perhaps mostly due to the struggle between the convictions and aims represented by different groups. The Jews 
382too form such a group with a definite character of its own, and anti-semitism is nothing but the antagonistic attitude produced in the non-Jews by the Jewish group " 
383
384He goes on to say what unites the Jewish people: 
385
386"The bond that unites the Jews for thousands of years and unites them today is, above all, the democractic ideal of social justice, coupled with the 
387idea of mutual aid and tolerance among all men. ..." 
388
389You aren't going to find that on whitespeech, or stormfront. 
390add your comments
391http://cleveland.indymedia.org/news/2006/10/22798.php
392
393
394Nuke Bomb In NYC Israeli Embassy?
395Posted by :Prothink On : March 24, 2010
3960
397Category:Uncategorized
398“…One alleged radiation hot spot on Manhattan’s east side has the
399potential for becoming a political hot spot: A strong radiation spike
400from the area of the Israeli Embassy. Officials would not comment on why
401they thought that particular area allegedly showed such a stunning peak
402in radiation…”
403I wonder if this is what they are holding over the heads of people who would want to something about this mess in this nation? This is only one place as well, how many other places could they be hiding nukes? And Israeli security is already in control of all our domestic nuclear power facilities and military nuke installations: http://www.rense.com/general78/cpontrol.htm
404Source: http://cleveland.indymedia.org/news/2006/10/22798.php
405http://www.prothink.org/2010/03/24/nuke-bomb-in-nyc-israeli-embassy/
406
407 
408
409Israeli Co Has Security 
410Control Of US Nuke Arsenal
411From Dick Eastman
41210 -8 -7
413
414Israeli company, Magal Security Systems-owned in part by the government of Israel has security control of US nuke arsenal
415 
416If true it means the US does not control its nuclear arsenal, that Israel has veto power over our use of nuclear weapons and that the nuclear inventory is secure only to the extent that Israel determines. The Pentagon and Homeland security are in Zionist hands. Effectively the United States is held captive by Israeli operatives.
417 
418Here is the story:
419 
420http://kavkazcenter.com/eng/content/2007/09/26/8910.shtml
421 
422American supporters of Israel were delighted to learn that an Israeli company, Magal Security Systems-owned in part by the government of Israel-is in charge of security for the most sensitive nuclear power and weapons storage facilities in the United States.
423 
424The largest perimeter security company in the world, Magal started out as a division of Israeli Aircraft Industries (IAI)-which was owned in part by the government of Israel. In recent years, however, Magal evolved into a publicly-traded company, although IAI (and thus the government of Israel) still holds a substantial share in the highly successful firm.
425 
426What all of this means is that the government of Israel will actually have control over the security of America's nuclear weapons.
427 
428Supporters of Israel say that this is a splendid idea, since Israel is said to be perhaps America's closest ally on the face of the planet. However, there are some critics who question the propriety of America's super-sensitive nuclear security being in the hands of any foreign nation, particularly Israel which, even today, officially denies that it is engaged in the production of nuclear arms.
429 
430Be that as it may, however, Magal's global interests are quite broad-ranging. Having secured 90 percent of Israel's borders through a wide-ranging array of super-modern "space age" technology, Magal has now branched out internationally.
431 
432Not only does Magal provide security for American nuclear facilities, but it also does likewise for most major nuclear facilities in Western Europe and Asia. In addition, the Israeli firm also provides security for Chicago's O'Hare Airport and, for the last fifteen years, has kept watch on the Queen of England's famed Buckingham Palace in London. What's more, Magal provides 
433 
434 
435Disclaimer
436 
437
438
439Email This Article 
440
441 
442
443
444MainPage
445http://www.rense.com
446
447
448This Site Served by TheHostPros
449http://www.rense.com/general78/cpontrol.htm
450
451Home
452Odigo Says Workers Were Warned of Attack
453Odigo, the instant messaging service, says that two of its workers received messages two hours before the Twin Towers attack on September 11 predicting the attack would happen, and the company has been cooperating with Israeli and American law enforcement, including the FBI, in trying to find the original sender of the message predicting the attack.
454
455Yuval Dror 26.09.2001 00:00 Updated: 12:43 AM
456Odigo, the instant messaging service, says that two of its workers received messages two hours before the Twin Towers attack on September 11 predicting the attack would happen, and the company has been cooperating with Israeli and American law enforcement, including the FBI, in trying to find the original sender of the message predicting the attack.
457Micha Macover, CEO of the company, said the two workers received the messages and immediately after the terror attack informed the company's management, which immediately contacted the Israeli security services, which brought in the FBI.
458"I have no idea why the message was sent to these two workers, who don't know the sender. It may just have been someone who was joking and turned out they accidentally got it right. And I don't know if our information was useful in any of the arrests the FBI has made," said Macover. Odigo is a U.S.-based company whose headquarters are in New York, with offices in Herzliya.
459As an instant messaging service, Odigo users are not limited to sending messages only to people on their "buddy" list, as is the case with ICQ, the other well-known Israeli instant messaging application.
460Odigo usually zealously protects the privacy of its registered users, said Macover, but in this case the company took the initiative to provide the law enforcement services with the originating Internet Presence address of the message, so the FBI could track down the Internet Service Provider, and the actual sender of the original message.
461	
462Yuval Dror
463Haaretz Contributor
464http://www.haaretz.com/odigo-says-workers-were-warned-of-attack-1.70579
465
466
467
468The Israelis who were warned hours before 9/11
469
470 
471*** The leading Israeli newspaper, Haaretz, confirmed today that at least two employees at the Israeli-based telecoms company, Odigo, knew what was about to happen two hours before the the Twin Towers of the World Trade Centre were attacked on 11 September 2001.
472    The warning was immediately passed on directly to Israeli and American security services. This all happened before the attacks took place, yet the intelligence services and the military have claimed that they were not prepared. ***
473
474Odigo, the instant messaging service, says that two of its workers received messages two hours before the Twin Towers attack on September 11 predicting the attack would happen, and the company has been cooperating with Israeli and American law enforcement, including the FBI, in trying to find the original sender of the message predicting the attack.
475
476Micha Macover, CEO of the company, said the two workers received the messages and immediately after the terror attack informed the company's management, which immediately contacted the Israeli security services, which brought in the FBI.
477
478"I have no idea why the message was sent to these two workers, who don't know the sender. It may just have been someone who was joking and turned out they accidentally got it right. And I don't know if our information was useful in any of the arrests the FBI has made," said Macover. Odigo is a U.S.-based company whose headquarters are in New York, with offices in Herzliya.
479
480As an instant messaging service, Odigo users are not limited to sending messages only to people on their "buddy" list, as is the case with ICQ, the other well-known Israeli instant messaging application. 
481
482Odigo usually zealously protects the privacy of its registered users, said Macover, but in this case the company took the initiative to provide the law enforcement services with the originating Internet Presence address of the message, so the FBI could track down the Internet Service Provider, and the actual sender of the original message.
483
484SOURCE: Haaretz (IL), "Odigo says workers were warned of attack", 16 July 2004.
485[ http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=77744 ]
486
487
488FURTHER READING
489
490Washington Post, "Instant Messages To Israel Warned Of WTC Attack", 28 September 2001.
491    OFFICIALS at instant-messaging firm Odigo confirmed today that two employees received text messages warning of an attack on the World Trade Center two hours before terrorists crashed planes into the New York landmarks. Citing a pending investigation by law enforcement, the company declined to reveal the exact contents of the message or to identify the sender.
492    But Alex Diamandis, vice president of sales and marketing, confirmed that workers in Odigo's research and development and international sales office in Israel received a warning from another Odigo user approximately two hours prior to the first attack. Diamandis said the sender of the instant message was not personally known to the Odigo employees. Even though the company usually protects the privacy of users, the employees recorded the Internet protocol address of the message's sender to facilitate his or her identification.
493    Soon after the terrorist attacks on New York, the Odigo employees notified their management, who contacted Israeli security services. In turn, the FBI was informed of the instant message warning. FBI officials were not immediately available for comment today. The Odigo service includes a feature called People Finder that allows users to seek out and contact others based on certain interests or demographics. Diamandis said it was possible that the attack warning was broadcast to other Odigo members, but the company has not received reports of other recipients of the message.
494    In addition to operating its own messaging service network, Odigo has licensed its technology to over 100 service providers, portals, wireless carriers, and corporations, according to the company. 
495http://www.theinsider.org/news/article.asp?id=520
496
497Complete 911 Timeline
498Randy Glass and Operation Diamondback
499Project: Complete 911 Timeline
500Open-Content project managed by matt, Paul, KJF, mtuck, paxvector
501add event | references
502Between 1999 and Early 2001: Later Moussaoui Case Supervisor Attempts to ‘Derail’ FBI Investigation of Bin Laden Associates Linked to Pakistani Intelligence Service
503   
504 This unnamed Pakistani intelligence agent involved in the attempted weapons purchase was captured on undercover video in January 2001.[Source: Corbis]Dave Frasca, an FBI supervisor who will later play a key role in the FBI’s failure to get a warrant to search Zacarias Moussaoui’s belongings before 9/11 (see August 21, 2001 andAugust 29, 2001), attempts to “derail” an investigation into radicals attempting to purchase weapons in the US, according to Randy Glass, a mole used in the operation. Glass, a former conman who poses as an arms dealer to help the FBI catch the radicals, will make the allegations in a May 2004 interview with the 9/11 Commission. According to Glass, Frasca, a supervisor at the FBI’s Miami office, hampers the operation in three ways. First, he rejects the idea of investigating the three men, Diaa Mohsen, Mohammed Malik, and RJ Abbas, the ISI intelligence agent, entirely. However, another FBI supervisor and an official from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF) intervene to keep the case alive. Frasca also prevents two unnamed agents from tapping Mohsen’s telephone. According to a 9/11 Commission summary of Glass’s interview, “Mohsen was talking to everybody,” so presumably such electronic surveillance would have been very fruitful. Finally, Frasca attempts to “sabotage” the investigation by refusing to pay money promised to Glass so that he can buy a false passport from Mohsen. Glass will say that Frasca uses another, unnamed agent to “threaten” him over the passport purchase. The other agent tells Glass, “Frasca says that if you buy this passport, you will be charged with a crime.” However, an official apparently with another government agency tells Glass, “F_ck the FBI, go ahead and purchase the passport,” and Glass apparently does so. [9/11 COMMISSION, 5/4/2004] Frasca will be promoted in 2001 (see Early 2001).
505Entity Tags: US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Rajaa Gulum Abbas, Mohammed Malik, David Frasca, Diaa Mohsen, Randy Glass, Federal Bureau of Investigation
506Category Tags: Randy Glass/ Diamondback
507Spring 1999: New Jersey HMO Is Possibly Funding Al-Qaeda
508   
509Randy Glass is a con artist turned government informant participating in a sting called Operation Diamondback. [PALM BEACH POST, 9/29/2001] He discusses an illegal weapons deal with an Egyptian-American named Mohamed el Amir. In wiretapped conversations, Mohamed discusses the need to get false papers to disguise a shipment of illegal weapons. His brother, Dr. Magdy el Amir, has been a wealthy neurologist in Jersey City for the past twenty years. Two other weapons dealers later convicted in a sting operation involving Glass also lived in Jersey City, and both el Amirs admit knowing one of them, Diaa Mohsen. Mohsen has been paid at least once by Dr. el Amir. In 1998, Congressman Ben Gilman was given a foreign intelligence report suggesting that Dr. el Amir owns an HMO that is secretly funded by Osama bin Laden, and that money is being skimmed from the HMO to fund al-Qaeda activities. The state of New Jersey later buys the HMO and determines that $15 million were unaccounted for and much of that has been diverted into hard-to-trace offshore bank accounts. However, investigators working with Glass are never given the report about Dr. el Amir. Neither el Amir has been charged with any crime. Mohamed now lives in Egypt and Magdy continues to practice medicine in New Jersey. Glass’s sting, which began in late 1998, will uncover many interesting leads before ending in June 2001. [MSNBC, 8/2/2002] Remarkably, Dr. Magdy el Amir’s lawyer is none other than Michael Chertoff, a prominent criminal defense lawyer in New Jersey, who will later join the Bush administration’s Justice Department as assistant attorney general in charge of the Criminal Division and then become homeland defense secretary. [NEW YORK TIMES, 12/18/1998; BERGEN RECORD, 6/19/2000] After 9/11, Chertoff will play a leading role in investigating and prosecuting terrorist crimes, including terrorism financing through money laundering. [NEW YORKER, 11/5/2001] It seems that the only subsequent media reference to Chertoff’s involvement in the el Amir case will appear in an opinion column by Sidney Blumenthal, a strong critic of the Bush administration. [SALON, 12/22/2005]
510Entity Tags: Osama bin Laden, Operation Diamondback, Mohamed el Amir, Diaa Mohsen, Magdy el Amir, Randy Glass, Michael Chertoff
511Category Tags: Other Possible Moles or Informants, Randy Glass/ Diamondback,Pakistan and the ISI, Terrorism Financing
512July 14, 1999: Pakistani ISI Agent Promises Attack on WTC in Recorded Conversation
513   
514 Shireen Shawky holding a guided missile system (left), and Mohammed Malik (right). [Source: Getty Images]US government informant Randy Glass records a conversation at a dinner attended by himself, illegal arms dealers Diaa Mohsen and Mohammed Malik, a former Egyptian judge named Shireen Shawky, and Pakistani ISI agent Rajaa Gulum Abbas, held at a restaurant within view of the World Trade Center. FBI agents pretending to be restaurant customers sit at nearby tables. [MSNBC, 8/2/2002; WPBF 25 (WEST PALM BEACH), 8/5/2002] Abbas says he wants to buy a whole shipload of weapons stolen from the US military to give to Osama bin Laden. [COX NEWS SERVICE, 8/2/2002]Abbas points to the WTC and says, “Those towers are coming down.” This ISI agent later makes two other references to an attack on the WTC. [COX NEWS SERVICE, 8/2/2002; WPBF 25 (WEST PALM BEACH), 8/5/2002; PALM BEACH POST, 10/17/2002]Abbas also says, “Americans [are] the enemy,” and, “We would have no problem with blowing up this entire restaurant because it is full of Americans.”[NBC, 3/18/2003] The meeting is secretly recorded and parts will be shown on television in 2003. [MSNBC, 3/18/2003]
515Entity Tags: Osama bin Laden, Mohammed Malik, Rajaa Gulum Abbas, Diaa Mohsen,Federal Bureau of Investigation, World Trade Center, Randy Glass, Shireen Shawky
516Timeline Tags: A. Q. Khan's Nuclear Network, 9/11 Timeline
517Category Tags: Randy Glass/ Diamondback, Other Possible Moles or Informants,Pakistan and the ISI, Pakistani ISI Links to 9/11
518August 17, 1999: Arms Merchants Seek Nuclear Materials in US; Report Is Sanitized
519   
520 Randy Glass, holding a Stinger missile.[Source: David Friedman/ Getty Images]A group of illegal arms merchants, including an ISI agent with foreknowledge of 9/11, had met in a New York restaurant the month before (see July 14, 1999). This same group meets at this time in a West Palm Beach, Florida, warehouse, and it is shown Stinger missiles as part of a sting operation. [SOUTH FLORIDA SUN-SENTINEL, 3/20/2003] US intelligence soon discovers connections between two in the group, Rajaa Gulum Abbas and Mohammed Malik, Islamic militant groups in Kashmir (where the ISI assists them in fighting against India), and the Taliban. Mohamed Malik suggests in this meeting that the Stingers will be used in Kashmir or Afghanistan. His colleague Diaa Mohsen also says Abbas has direct connections to “dignitaries” and bin Laden. Abbas also wants heavy water for a “dirty bomb” or other material to make a nuclear weapon. He says he will bring a Pakistani nuclear scientist to the US to inspect the material. [MSNBC, 8/2/2002; NBC, 3/18/2003] According to Dick Stoltz, a federal undercover agent posing as a black market arms dealer, one of the Pakistanis at the warehouse claims he is working for A.Q. Khan. A Pakistani nuclear scientist, Khan is considered the father of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program and also the head of an illegal network exporting nuclear technology to rogue nations. [MSNBC, 1/14/2005]Government informant Randy Glass passes these warnings on before 9/11, but he claims, “The complaints were ordered sanitized by the highest levels of government.” [WPBF 25 (WEST PALM BEACH), 8/5/2002] In June 2002, the US secretly indicts Abbas, but apparently they aren’t trying very hard to find him: In August 2002, MSNBC is easily able to contact Abbas in Pakistan and speak to him by telephone. [MSNBC, 8/2/2002]
521Entity Tags: Diaa Mohsen, Taliban, Rajaa Gulum Abbas, Pakistan Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence, Randy Glass, Abdul Qadeer Khan, Mohammed Malik, Osama bin Laden
522Timeline Tags: A. Q. Khan's Nuclear Network
523Category Tags: Pakistan and the ISI, Randy Glass/ Diamondback, Other Possible Moles or Informants, Pakistani Nukes & Islamic Militancy
524June 12, 2001: Sting Operation Exposes Al-Qaeda, ISI, and Drug Connections; Investigators Face Obstacles to Learn More
525   
526 Kevin Ingram, Randy Glass, and Diaa Mohsen in August 1999. [Source: Getty Images] (click image to enlarge)Operation Diamondback, a sting operation uncovering an attempt to buy weapons illegally for the Taliban, bin Laden, and others, ends with a number of arrests. An Egyptian named Diaa Mohsen and a Pakistani named Mohammed Malik are arrested and accused of attempting to buy Stinger missiles, nuclear weapon components, and other sophisticated military weaponry for the Pakistani ISI.[CNN, 6/15/2001; SOUTH FLORIDA SUN-SENTINEL, 8/23/2001; WASHINGTON POST, 8/2/2002]Malik appears to have had links to important Pakistani officials and Kashmiri militants, and Mohsen claims a connection to a man “who is very connected to the Taliban” and funded by bin Laden. [WASHINGTON POST, 8/2/2002; MSNBC, 8/2/2002]Some other ISI agents came to Florida on several occasions to negotiate, but they escaped being arrested. They wanted to pay partially in heroin. One mentioned that the WTC would be destroyed. These ISI agents said some of their purchases would go to the Taliban in Afghanistan and/or militants associated with bin Laden. [WASHINGTON POST, 8/2/2002; MSNBC, 8/2/2002] Both Malik and Mohsen lived in Jersey City, New Jersey. [JERSEY JOURNAL, 6/20/2001] Mohsen pleads guilty after 9/11, “but remarkably, even though [he was] apparently willing to supply America’s enemies with sophisticated weapons, even nuclear weapons technology, Mohsen was sentenced to just 30 months in prison.”[MSNBC, 8/2/2002] Malik’s case appears to have been dropped, and reporters find him working in a store in Florida less than a year after the trial ended. [MSNBC, 8/2/2002] Malik’s court files remain completely sealed, and in Mohsen’s court case, prosecutors “removed references to Pakistan from public filings because of diplomatic concerns.” [WASHINGTON POST, 8/2/2002] Also arrested are Kevin Ingram and Walter Kapij. Ingram pleads guilty to laundering $350,000 and he is sentenced to 18 months in prison. [CNN, 6/15/2001; BLACK ENTERPRISE, 6/19/2001;ASSOCIATED PRESS, 12/1/2001] Ingram was a former senior investment banker with Deutsche Bank, but resigned in January 1999 after his division suffered costly losses. [BLACK ENTERPRISE, 6/19/2001; JERSEY JOURNAL, 6/20/2001] Walter Kapij, a pilot with a minor role in the plot, is given the longest sentence, 33 months in prison.[CNN, 6/15/2001; BLACK ENTERPRISE, 6/19/2001; PALM BEACH POST, 1/12/2002] Informant Randy Glass plays a key role in the sting, and has thirteen felony fraud charges against him reduced as a result, serving only seven months in prison. Federal agents involved in the case later express puzzlement that Washington higher-ups did not make the case a higher priority, pointing out that bin Laden could have gotten a nuclear bomb if the deal was for real. Agents on the case complain that the FBI did not make the case a counterterrorism matter, which would have improved bureaucratic backing and opened access to FBI information and US intelligence from around the world. [WASHINGTON POST, 8/2/2002; MSNBC, 8/2/2002] Federal agents frequently couldn’t get prosecutors to approve wiretaps. [COX NEWS SERVICE, 8/2/2002] Glass says, “Wouldn’t you think that there should have been a wire tap on Diaa [Mohsen]‘s phone and Malik’s phone?” [WPBF 25 (WEST PALM BEACH), 8/5/2002] An FBI supervisor in Miami refused to front money for the sting, forcing agents to use money from US Customs and even Glass’s own money to help keep the sting going. [COX NEWS SERVICE, 8/2/2002]
527Entity Tags: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Mohammed Malik, Kevin Ingram, World Trade Center, Diaa Mohsen, US Customs Service, Walter Kapij, Pakistan Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence, Osama bin Laden, Taliban, Randy Glass, Operation Diamondback
528Timeline Tags: A. Q. Khan's Nuclear Network
529Category Tags: Randy Glass/ Diamondback, Pakistan and the ISI, Drugs, Other Possible Moles or Informants
530Early August 2001: Government Informant Warns Congressmen of Plan to Attack the WTC
531   
532 Randy Glass. [Source: Banded Artists Productions]Randy Glass, a former con artist turned government informant, will later claim that he contacts the staff of Senator Bob Graham (D-NY) and Representative Robert Wexler (D-FL) at this time, and warns them of a plan to attack the World Trade Center, but his warnings are ignored. [PALM BEACH POST, 10/17/2002] Glass also tells the media at the present time that his recently concluded informant work has “far greater ramifications than have so far been revealed,” and, “potentially, thousands of lives [are] at risk.” [SOUTH FLORIDA SUN-SENTINEL, 8/7/2001] Glass was a key informant in a sting operation involving Pakistani ISI agents who were illegally trying to purchase sophisticated US military weaponry in return for cash and heroin. He will claim that in July 1999, one ISI agent named Rajaa Gulum Abbas pointed to the WTC and said, “Those towers are coming down.” [PALM BEACH POST, 10/17/2002]Most details will apparently remain sealed. For instance Glass will claim that his sealed sentencing document dated June 15, 2001, lists threats against the WTC and Americans but, according to Glass, “[t]he complaints were ordered sanitized by the highest levels of government.” [WPBF 25 (WEST PALM BEACH), 8/5/2002] Florida State Senator Ron Klein, who has dealings with Glass before 9/11, will say he is surprised it took so many months for the US to listen to Glass. “Shame on us,” he will say. [PALM BEACH POST, 10/17/2002] Klein will recall getting a warning from Glass, though he cannot recall if it mentions the WTC specifically. He will say he was told US intelligence agencies would look into it.[WPTV 5 (WEST PALM BEACH), 10/7/2002] Graham will later acknowledge that his office has contact with Glass before 9/11, and is told about a WTC attack, saying, “I was concerned about that and a dozen other pieces of information which emanated from the summer of 2001.” However, Graham will say that he personally is unaware of Glass’s information until after 9/11. [PALM BEACH POST, 10/17/2002] In October 2002, Glass will testify under oath before a private session of the 9/11 Congressional Inquiry, and tell it that he has “specific evidence, and I can document it.” [PALM BEACH POST, 10/17/2002]
533Entity Tags: Robert Wexler, Randy Glass, Daniel Robert (“Bob”) Graham, Pakistan Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence, Ron Klein, Rajaa Gulum Abbas, World Trade Center
534Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
535Category Tags: Key Warnings, Randy Glass/ Diamondback, Warning Signs, Other Possible Moles or Informants
536July 2002: Militants Tied to Al-Qaeda and ISI Indicted by US, but Little Effort Is Made to Find Them
537   
538The US secretly indicts Rajaa Gulum Abbas and Abdul Malik for attempting to buy $32 million in Stinger missiles and other military weaponry in an undercover arms-dealing investigation. However, a US official states that Abbas is an alleged member of the ISI, and is thought to have ties to Middle Eastern militant groups and arms-trafficking operations. He also appears to have foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks. Abdul Malik is said to be Abbas’s money man. Abdul Malik is not related to Mohammed Malik, another Pakistani targeted by the undercover operation. The chief US informant in the case, Randy Glass, says that both men also have clear ties to al-Qaeda, and the arms were going to be funneled to al-Qaeda and used against American targets. [PALM BEACH POST, 3/20/2003; SOUTH FLORIDA SUN-SENTINEL, 3/20/2003] The indictment is not revealed until March 2003; both men still remain missing and are presumed to be in Pakistan. The US says it is still working on capturing and extraditing Abbas and Malik. [NBC, 3/18/2003]NBC seems to have no trouble reaching Abbas in Pakistan by telephone. [MSNBC, 8/2/2002; NBC, 3/18/2003] The indictment “makes no mention of Pakistan, any ties to Afghanistan’s former Taliban regime or the ultimate destination of the weapons.” [PALM BEACH POST, 3/20/2003]
539Entity Tags: Taliban, Randy Glass, US Department of Justice, Mohammed Malik, Al-Qaeda, Abdul Malik, Rajaa Gulum Abbas
540Timeline Tags: A. Q. Khan's Nuclear Network
541Category Tags: Randy Glass/ Diamondback, Pakistan and the ISI
542August 2, 2002: ISI Tried to Buy Nuclear Material for Bin Laden
543   
544 This unnamed Pakistani intelligence agent was captured on undercover video in January 2001 as part of Operation Diamondback. [Source: Dateline NBC]MSNBC airs recordings informant Randy Glass made of arms dealers and Pakistani ISI agents attempting to buy nuclear material and other illegal weapons for bin Laden. [MSNBC, 8/2/2002]Meanwhile, it is reported that federal investigators are re-examining the arms smuggling case involving Glass “to determine whether agents of the Pakistani government tried to buy missiles and nuclear weapons components in the United States last year for use by terrorists or Pakistan’s military.”[WASHINGTON POST, 8/2/2002] Two such ISI agents, Rajaa Gulum Abbas and Abdul Malik, are already secretly indicted by this time. But Glass still says, “The government knows about those involved in my case who were never charged, never deported, who actively took part in bringing terrorists into our country to meet with me and undercover agents.” [COX NEWS SERVICE, 8/2/2002] One such person may be a former Egyptian judge named Shireen Shawky, who was interested in buying weapons for the Taliban and attended a meeting in July 1999 in which ISI agent Rajaa Gulum Abbas said the WTC would be destroyed.[MSNBC, 8/2/2002; WPBF 25 (WEST PALM BEACH), 8/5/2002] Others not charged may include Mohamed el Amir and Dr. Magdy el Amir.
545Entity Tags: Randy Glass, Taliban, World Trade Center, Rajaa Gulum Abbas, Shireen Shawky, Pakistan, Mohamed el Amir, Osama bin Laden, Pakistan Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence, Magdy el Amir, Abdul Malik
546Timeline Tags: A. Q. Khan's Nuclear Network
547Category Tags: Randy Glass/ Diamondback, Pakistan and the ISI, Pakistani Nukes & Islamic Militancy
548
549http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&projects_and_programs=randyGlass
550
5512 + 2 = Israel nuked the WTC on 9/11
552By Jim Fetzer on May 1, 2015
553By Don Fox (with Jim Fetzer)
554 
555“[I]f New York was outsourced to the Mossad and if the Twin Towers were nuked, then the nukes that were used must have been Israeli….[N]o alternative explanation is reasonable.”–Jim Fetzer
556 
557How many wars is the US supposed to fight for Israel?  How many of our sons and daughters must die? How much of our national treasury and moral standing must be squandered to insure Israeli domination of the Middle East?
558Does any serious analyst actually believe that the Syrian government–which has been routing the rebels for the past several months–would jeopardize its standing in the eyes of the world by launching a gas attack when it has no reason to do so?  
559Does anyone believe that doing so on the eve of the arrival of a UN inspection team would be rational?  Are the American people so stupid and gullible that we are going to fall for the same “song and dance” from the nation’s leaders who so completely misled us about the massive surveillance being conducted by the NSA?
560The lied to us about Iraq. They lied to us about Libya. They lied to us about Iran. And what could be more obvious than that they are lying to us again about Syria? The US is wreaking havoc in the Middle East for Israel. We have become Israeli liars, enforcers, stooges and dupes!
561The absurdity of the American position by claiming that it needs to punish Bashar Assad for the violation of international law was apparent today when Charles Heyman, a former British officer who edits The Armed Forces of the UK, observed that attacking Syria without a mandate from the UN Security Council would itself be a gross violation of international law, rather like the claims made during the Vietnam war that “they had to destroy the village in order to save it”! Under Barack Obama, the US has become an international joke.
562Some historical background
563We know that 9/11 involved close collusion between the neo-cons in the Department of Defense and the Mossad to create a pretext for the US to invade the Middle East and deconstruct the modern Arab states by converting them into statelets to promote the domination of the Middle East by Israel. We know that New York City appears to have been outsourced to Israel and that the destruction of the Twin Towers, unlike WTC-7, can only be explained on the basis of sophisticated arrangements of mini or micro nukes. We have proven this again and again and again. It is beyond reasonable doubt.
564The most powerful proof, ironically, comes from dust samples collected by the USGS, which substantiate the presence of elements that would not be present in this form had the destruction of the Twin Towers not been a nuclear event. Those include:
565Barium and Strontium: Neither of these elements should ever appear in building debris in these quantities. The levels never fall below 400ppm for Barium and they never drop below 700ppm for Strontium and reach over 3000ppm for both in the dust sample taken at Broadway and John Streets.
566Thorium and Uranium: These elements only exist in radioactive form. Thorium is a radioactive element formed from Uranium by decay. It’s very rare and should not be present in building rubble, ever. So once again we have verifiable evidence that a nuclear fission event has taken place.
567Lithium: With the presence of lithium we have compelling evidence that this fission pathway of Uranium to Thorium and Helium, with subsequent decay of the Helium into Lithium has taken place.
568Lanthanum: Lanthanum is the next element in the disintegration pathway of the element Barium.
569Yttrium: The next decay element after Strontium, which further confirms the presence of Barium.
570Chromium: The presence of Chromium is one more “tell tale” signature of a nuclear detonation.
571Tritium: A very rare element and should not be found at concentrations 55 times normal the basement of WTC-6 no less than 11 days after 9/11, which is another “tell tale” sign of nukes.
572But the proof also includes the dramatic incidence of cancers associated with nuclear events, where, as Jeff Prager has observed, (a) Multiple Myeloma in the general population at a rate of 3-9 incidents per 100,000 people, but the rate was 18 per 100,000 among first responders; (b) that other cancers relatively unusual cancers have appeared among the responders, including non-Hodgkins lymphoma, leukemia, thyroid, pancreatic, brain, prostate, esophageal and blood and plasma cancers; and (c) that, as of March 2011 no less than 1,003 first responders died from various cancers. Those familiar with the available evidence who continue to deny that 9/11 was a nuclear event would appear to be either cognitively impaired or deliberately deceptive.
573How it was done
574WTC-7 was destroyed by a classic controlled demolition, where all the floors fell at the same time, none of its floors were blown apart, and there was a stack of debris equal to 12% of the original height of the 47-story building (about 5.5 floors of debris). The Twin Towers, by contrast, were blow apart sequentially from the top down; they were converted into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust; each floor remained stationary until its turn came; and, when it was over, the buildings had been destroyed below ground level: there was no stack debris (which should have been around 12 floors high). They did not collapse. They were blown apart using mini or micro nukes, which too many have continued to deny for too long.
575
576YouTube - Veterans Today -
577Indeed, if we assume that it was done by blowing one ten-floor cube per second, then the time for the destruction of the 110-floor North Tower would have been approximately 11 seconds, which is the time estimate of NIST. And when we note that the top three floors of the South Tower had begun to tilt and were blown as one, then the time for its destruction would have been approximately 9 seconds, which is also in agreement withe the time estimate of NIST. This appears to have been roughly how it was done, where we will continue to fine-tune the sequence as we continue.
578But what is most striking is that we know the Twin Towers were nuked and we know that New York appears to have been outsourced to the Mossad. What we have now realized–it is like adding “2” and “2”–is that, if New York was outsourced to the Mossad and if the Twin Towers were nuked, then the nukes that were used must have been Israeli. And that by itself may explain why New York was outsourced to the Mossad. Israel has refused to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Israel does not allow inspectors. Unlike the US, whose nuclear arsenal is tightly controlled, Israel could use its nukes–as it appears to have recently done in Syria–without having to answer to anyone and without any risk of detection. Indeed, we have now proven this beyond a reasonable doubt, because no alternative explanation is reasonable.
579 
580Did Israel Nuke the WTC on 9/11?
581 
582By Don Fox
583There are voices in the 9/11 Truth Community who believe that determining the exact cause of the World Trade Center building’s destruction is unnecessary and perhaps even a waste of time. One often hears comments that the official government account is blatantly false and that should be sufficient to get a real investigation launched into the events of 9/11. However the track record of government investigations into government crimes is rather poor (see the Warren Commission and the House Select Committee on Assassinations). Since an honest official investigation into 9/11 with subpoena powers is not likely to happen the task has fallen to private citizen researchers to determine what really happened that awful day.
584Before you can determine WHO committed a crime you first must determine HOW it was done. No doubt that the events of 9/11 were some of the most outrageous crimes ever committed so the effort to determine HOW it was done is certainly justified. 9/11 has radically changed the world and certainly not for the better. In order to understand how the post 9/11 world actually works, determining WHO and HOW it was done is are vital questions. Merely stating that “9/11 was an inside job” is not good enough.
585 
586The major alternative theories of the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings include the directed energy weapon (DEW) (non) theory (associated with Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson), the nanothermite theory (associated with Steve Jones, Kevin Ryan and Richard Gage), the big nuke theory of Dimitri Khalezov (150 kt subbasement nukes) and the mini-nuke theory (associated with Dr. Ed Ward MD, the Anonymous Physicist, Dr. Bill Deagle, Jeff Prager and myself). We have determined that the mini/micro nuke hypothesis best fits the evidence. See the Mystery Solved and the Mini-Neutron Bomb articles for a full break down of the WTC Mini-Nuke Theory.
587Nuclear Bombs Narrows the List of Suspects
588Very few groups have access to nuclear bombs. Officially there are five countries designated as Nuclear Weapons States: China, France, Russia, United Kingdom and the United States. Three more countries have conducted nuclear weapons tests: India, Pakistan and North Korea. There is another country who refuses to confirm or deny that it has nuclear weapons: Israel. Though it is believed that Israel has produced enough weapons-grade plutonium for 100-200 nuclear warheads. Former President Jimmy Carter has stated that Israel has more than 150 nuclear weapons.
589Of these Nuclear Weapons States which ones would have had the motive, means and opportunity to detonate nuclear bombs in downtown Manhattan? The Twin Towers were destroyed by a very sophisticated arrangement of mini-nukes that were placed in the core columns of the buildings, detonated sequentially from top to bottom and configured to explode upward. This arrangement allowed the nukes in the upper floors of the buildings to explode without destroying the bombs beneath simulating a free fall collapse.  This was the epitome of an Inside Job!
590I think we can safely rule out China, France, Russia, the UK, India, Pakistan and North Korea. None of these countries would have had access to the core columns of these giant skyscrapers required to pull of this feat. Had the Towers been destroyed by an ICBM or a sub-based missile then some of these other Nuclear States may be suspects.
591 
592Certainly the United States military and intelligence community had the ability to pull off 9/11. The United States is the world’s leading nuclear superpower with the most advanced nuclear weapons arsenal. However the United States is a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and several treaties (SALT, START I, START II, START III and New START) with the former Soviet Union/Russia.
593The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, also referred to as the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), obligates the five acknowledged nuclear-weapon states (the United States, Russian Federation, United Kingdom, France, and China) not to transfer nuclear weapons, other nuclear explosive devices, or their technology to any non-nuclear-weapon state. Nuclear weapon States Parties are also obligated, under Article VI, to “pursue negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament, and on a treaty on general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control.”
594Non-nuclear-weapon States Parties undertake not to acquire or produce nuclear weapons or nuclear explosive devices. They are required also to accept safeguards to detect diversions of nuclear materials from peaceful activities, such as power generation, to the production of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices. This must be done in accordance with an individual safeguards agreement, concluded between each non-nuclear-weapon State Party and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Under these agreements, all nuclear materials in peaceful civil facilities under the jurisdiction of the state must be declared to the IAEA, whose inspectors have routine access to the facilities for periodic monitoring and inspections. If information from routine inspections is not sufficient to fulfill its responsibilities, the IAEA may consult with the state regarding special inspections within or outside declared facilities.
595The United States nuclear arsenal is subject to inspections. Is it possible that some “loose nukes” made their way from the US stockpile to Ground Zero? It is possible but not a slam dunk by any stretch of the imagination. It appears more likely that nukes from an uninspected, rogue facility like Dimona would be used in an operation such as 9/11.
596All Roads Lead to Dimona
597As NTI.org has observed, “Israel has not joined the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) and is widely viewed as the first and only country in the Middle East to possess nuclear weapons. Believing a nuclear weapons deterrent to be essential vis-à-vis Israel’s Arab adversaries, Prime Minister David Ben Gurion instituted a nuclear weapons program in the mid-1950s as part of his “activist defense policy.” Consistent with Prime Minister Levi Eshkol’s declaration that “Israel will not be the first nation to introduce nuclear weapons to the Middle East,” Israel maintains a policy of “nuclear ambiguity,” or “nuclear opacity,” refraining from overt admissions that it possesses nuclear weapons, nuclear tests, or threats to its adversaries that explicitly involve nuclear weapons. Israel has also made extensive efforts to deny other regional actors the ability to acquire nuclear weapons, most prominently in the air strikes against Iraq’s Osiraq Reactor in 1981 and Syria’s suspected reactor near Al-Kibar in 2007.”
598President John F. Kennedy was deeply concerned about Israel using the Dimona nuclear plant to produce nuclear weapons. He wrote a letter concerning Dimona to Prime Minister Levi Eshkol on July 4th, 1963:
599Dear Mr. Prime Minister:
600It gives me great personal pleasure to extend congratulations as you assume your responsibilities as Prime Minister of Israel. You have our friendship and best wishes in your new tasks. It is on one of these that I am writing you at this time.
601You are aware, I am sure, of the exchanges which I had with Prime Minister Ben-Gurion concerning American visits to Israel’s nuclear facility at Dimona. Most recently, the Prime Minister wrote to me on May 27. His words reflected a most intense personal consideration of a problem that I know is not easy for your Government, as it is not for mine. We welcomed the former Prime Minister’s strong reaffirmation that Dimona will be devoted exclusively to peaceful purposes and the reaffirmation also of Israel’s willingness to permit periodic visits to Dimona.
602I regret having to add to your burdens so soon after your assumption of office, but I feel the crucial importance of this problem necessitates my taking up with you at this early date certain further considerations, arising out of Mr. Ben-Gurion’s May 27 letter, as to the nature and scheduling of such visits.
603I am sure you will agree that these visits should be as nearly as possible in accord with international standards, thereby resolving all doubts as to the peaceful intent of the Dimona project. [3-1/2 lines of source text not declassified]
604Therefore, I asked our scientists to review the alternative schedules of visits we and you had proposed. If Israel’s purposes are to be clear beyond reasonable doubt, I believe that the schedule which would best serve our common purposes would be a visit early this summer, another visit in June 1964, and thereafter at intervals of six months. I am sure that such a schedule should not cause you any more difficulty than that which Mr. Ben-Gurion proposed in his May 27 letter. It would be essential, and I understand that Mr. Ben-Gurion’s letter was in accord with this, that our scientists have access to all areas of the Dimona site and to any related part of the complex, such as fuel fabrication facilities or plutonium separation plant, and that sufficient time be allotted for a thorough examination.
605Knowing that you fully appreciate the truly vital significance of this matter to the future well-being of Israel, to the United States, and internationally, I am sure our carefully considered request will have your most sympathetic attention.
606Sincerely,
607John F. Kennedy
608US inspectors DID go to Dimona; however , they were not allowed to tour the entire facility:
609Under pressure from the newly elected American president, Israel reluctantly agreed in 1961 to U.S.-Israeli bilateral inspections of the Dimona nuclear facility. The inspections at Dimona were tightly controlled by the Israelis, and restricted to the first floor of the facility. U.S. inspectors were not allowed to bring their own technical instruments, take measurements, or see the control room, instead being shown a mock-up.
610It was later learned that the Israelis went so far as to wall-up elevator banks down to the underground reprocessing facility in order to evade discovery. When inspections ended in 1969, the visits had never produced any evidence of weapons-related activity or a plutonium-reprocessing facility, but inspectors often were left highly suspicious of illicit activities.
611The Nixonian Compromise
612The sham of US “inspections” continued until Nixon struck a deal with Golda Meir whereby Israel would not openly declare or test its nuclear capability and the US would cease inspections and stop pressuring Israel to sign the NPT.
613The gap between JFK and Nixon in regards to the Israeli nuclear program was enormous. Kennedy was not going to let Israel dictate terms to him. JFK was determined to stop Israel from producing nuclear weapons. If it turns out that Israel DID nuke the WTC buildings then there is a direct historical path from JFK’s assassination to 9/11. Had JFK lived to serve a second term Israel’s nuclear program may have been dismantled before they could have nuked anybody.
614Mordechai Vanunu worked at the Dimona plant and took photographs inside the facility in 1985. Vanunu revealed that indeed Dimona was producing nuclear bombs. Vanunu’s whistleblowing got him 18 years in the hoosegow; the first 11 ½ were in solitary confinement.
615 
616Production model of nulcear weapons core
617 
618Dimona’s plutonium separation control room.
619By the late 1970s Israel was believed to have produced thermonuclear weapons, mini-nukes in the 1980s and neutron bombs by 1995. While Israel’s nuclear arsenal was no match for the United States or Russia, Israel was certainly capable of pulling off the nuclear destruction of the World Trade Center buildings.
620Why Were Israelis Dancing on 9/11?
621Mike Rivero has an excellent post about the Dancing Israelis:
622The New York Times reported Thursday that a group of five men had set up video cameras aimed at the Twin Towers prior to the attack on Tuesday, and were seen congratulating one another afterwards. Police received several calls from angry New Jersey residents claiming “middle-eastern” men with a white van were videotaping the disaster with shouts of joy and mockery. They were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept. 11 making fun of the World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to photograph themselves in front of the wreckage. Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park after the initial impact. Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a roof in Weehawken, and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives in a Jersey City parking lot.
623According to ABC’s 20/20, when the van belonging to the cheering Israelis was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers: “We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem.”
624Later the Dancing Israelis appeared on an Israeli talk show:
625
626YouTube - Veterans Today -
627One of them declared that he was there to “document the event.” Who knew there was going to be an event to document? The actions of the Dancing Israelis lead a reasonable person to conclude that they were Mossad agents. It certainly appears that the Dancing Israelis knew the buildings were going to be nuked. They were cheering and high-fiving after the extremely sophisticated nuclear demolition sequence was pulled off to near perfection.
628Are Shills Covering Up Israeli Nukes at the WTC?
629The hysterics of the Wood Cult and the other nuke-denying shills makes a lot more sense if indeed they are covering for Israel’s rogue nuclear program. The shills will throw ANYTHING out there to divert people from looking at nukes: hurricanes, directed energy weapons, Steve Hutchison’s lab and nanothermite – anything to keep your eye off the ball. If you disagree with Judy Wood, Pete Santilli, Andrew Johnson, Emmanuel Goldstein, Thomas Potter or any other members of The Cult you will be subjected to attacks, intimidation and even death threats!
630Richard Gage does not allow discussion of any explosives except nanothermite. But of course nanothermite is not an explosive!  This has been demonstrated again and again by T. Mark Hightower, who is a chemical engineer, and Jim Fetzer, who have published three articles about it, namely:  “Has nanothermite been oversold to the 9/11 Truth community?”, “Is ‘9/11 Truth’ based upon a false theory?”, and “Nanothermite: If it doesn’t fit, you must acquit”.  These have been out for years and demonstrate conclusively that nanothermite cannot possibly have been responsible for blowing the Twin Towers apart.  Yet Richard Gage and A&E911 continue to promote the theory that it was done by nanothermite:
631
632YouTube - Veterans Today -
633 
634Some Sobering Thoughts
6359/11 was the most historically significant event since the Kennedy assassination. Understanding current events is impossible if you do not understand 9/11. The 9/11 scam was used to justify foreign wars of aggression in Iraq and Afghanistan, the TSA assault on travelers and the loss of civil rights for American citizens. The biggest question is who was really behind the events of 9/11?
636The destruction of the WTC buildings was a nuclear event. Only a handful of countries are considered Nuclear Weapons States. Of those countries only the United States and Israel would have had the necessary access to the buildings to plant the bombs. However the United States nuclear arsenal is subject to inspection by international organizations so the odds of the bombs coming from the US stockpile are much lower than the rogue Nuclear Weapons State Israel.
637Israel neither confirms nor denies that they have nuclear weapons but it’s an open secret that they have several hundred nuclear devices. Israel does not allow inspectors into the Dimona facility. When the US inspectors showed up in the 1960s, the Israelis cemented the elevator banks shut so that they could only inspect the first floor. These are not the actions of a Nuclear Weapons State with nothing to hide. The 9/11 wars have primarily benefited Israel. Who had the motive, means and opportunity to nuke the World Trade Center Buildings? The answer is as obvious as “2” plus “2”.
638Donald Fox has done extensive research on the role of mini-nukes by Dr. Ed Ward and on work by The Anonymous Physicist on the towers and has formulated an account of how it was done and why there is more to this story relative to very low-yield thermonuclear devices. See his blog at http://donaldfox.wordpress.com.
639       
640Related Posts:
641•	Obama Vision: U.S. Middle East Policy
642•	Spy State Shock: ALL Social Media Sharing with NSA
643•	James H. Fetzer: Anti-Iran Sanctions Violate International Law
644•	“Innocence of Muslims”, the GOP and World War III
645
646http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/05/01/2-2-israel-nuked-the-wtc-on-911/
647
648
649Donald Fox
650Exposing the Nuclear Truth of 9/11 and other things I find interesting
651 
652Search 
653Main menu
654Skip to primary content
655•	Home
656•	About
657Post navigation
658← PreviousNext →
659Rainbow in the Dark: Powerful Proof of 9/11 Nukes
660Posted on February 6, 2015
661New research falsifies the nanothermite and DEW alternatives while confirming the mini-nuke hypothesis
662 
663by Don Fox (with Jim Fetzer)
664In accounting for the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11, there are three contending factions within the 9/11 research community. While virtually everyone agrees that WTC-7 was brought down in a (classic) controlled demolition, they differ with respect to how the Twin Towers were destroyed, which was obviously not by means of any kind of collapse, which we know, given their design, would have been impossible, but which the government has told the American people was the case. These three factions advance different alternative hypotheses of how it was done:
665(h1) the nanothermite hypothesis, supported by A&E911, Steve Jones and Christopher Bollyn;
666(h2) the mini-nuke hypothesis, supported by Scholars for 9/11 Truth and others here at VT;
667(h3) the Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) hypothesis, supported by Judy Wood and her associates.
668A&E911 has received enormous support from the public, which has allowed its head, Richard Gage, to travel around the country and lead a comfortable life-style. His critics, however, are skeptical that A&E911 is on the up-and-up because its commitment to nanothernmite has been established to be inadequate as an explanation for the destruction of the Twin Towers, not least of all because in (its extant versions) nanothermite has an explosive force 1/13 as powerful as TNT. While A&E911 apologists maintain the organization does not deny other explosives may have been involved, it has made no effort to ascertain what those “other explosives” could possibly have been, which is inexcusable.
669That is rather astonishing, all things considered, because (h1) has been based (virtually exclusively) upon dust samples that were gathered from an apartment in close proximity to “Ground Zero”, where the US Geological Survey has done overwhelmingly more through, detailed and extensive studies of dust samples take from a wide range of locations around Manhattan and subjected them to spectrographic analysis, which has revealed many elements whose presence in the quantities and correlations only appear to be explicable if 9/11 was nuclear event as (h2) asserts:
670Barium and Strontium: Neither of these elements should ever appear in building debris in these quantities. The levels never fall below 400ppm for Barium and they never drop below 700ppm for Strontium and reach over 3000ppm for both in the dust sample taken at Broadway and John Streets.
671Thorium and Uranium: These elements only exist in radioactive form. Thorium is a radioactive element formed from Uranium by decay. It’s very rare and should not be present in building rubble, ever. So once again we have verifiable evidence that a nuclear fission event has taken place.
672Lithium: With the presence of lithium we have compelling evidence that this fission pathway of Uranium to Thorium and Helium, with subsequent decay of the Helium into Lithium has taken place.
673Lanthanum: Lanthanum is the next element in the disintegration pathway of the element Barium.
674Yttrium: The next decay element after Strontium, which further confirms the presence of Barium.
675Chromium: The presence of Chromium is one more “tell tale” signature of a nuclear detonation.
676Tritium: A very rare element and should not be found at concentrations 55 times normal the basement of WTC-6 no less than 11 days after 9/11, which is another “tell tale” sign of nukes.
677These findings expose the pseudo-scientific pretensions of the proponents of (h1) and of (h3) alike, neither of whom take the USGS data into account. That is especially ironic in the case of the “thermite sniffers”, since Steven Jones and A&E911 pride themselves on being “scientific” in their approach, when science requires that reasoning be based upon all the available evidence, yet they ignore more copious and detailed “dust sample” evidence than that upon which they base their own theory. And the “DEW huggers” display their incompetence in precisely the same way by failing to adjust their theory to new evidence and alternative hypotheses. Since I published my review on amazon.com in mid-2012, I have been assailed by an astounding 5,000 attacks by her fans:
678 
679 
680Donald Fox has done a brilliant job of exposing the role of Judy Wood as a “gatekeeper extraordinaire”, where the A&E911 (h1) group cannot be far behind. Unfortunately, a gullible public swoons over an organization composed of a thousand or more architects and engineers, even though they will not address WHO was responsible and WHY 9/11 took place and, like Judy Wood and her (h3) group, do not even provide an adequate explanation for HOW it was done. Here Don Fox advances a new line of argument confirming the use of nukes on 9/11 in support of (h2). This article has a more scientific and technical character than others, where we conclude with a glossary of terms related to the design, construction and detonation of nuclear weapons, the popularization of which Gordon Duff has pioneered, which, alas, must become part of the working knowledge of informed citizens today.
681 
682 
683Extensive studies by Charles Boldwyn have demonstrated that the Twin Towers could not have collapsed on 9/11
684 
685Rainbow in the Dark: Powerful Proof of 9/11 Nukes
686by Don Fox
687The destruction of the World Trade Center buildings was a high energy event. In the case of the Twin Towers two 110 story buildings were largely converted into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust in about 20 seconds. What was the source of energy that was responsible for the demise of these behemoths? Kerosene has no ability to produce the results observed at Ground Zero on 9/11.
688The evidence collected at Ground Zero tells us 9/11 was a nuclear event. The Department of Energy water samples contained tritium which is a rare hydrogen isotope and a telltale sign of a thermonuclear explosion. The USGS dust samples contained barium, strontium, yttrium and cesium amongst other fission products. The earth and water tell us what happened on 9/11: the WTC was nuked.
689Most 9/11 researchers (and the general public) lack a basic understanding of nuclear physics. This lack of physics knowledge has allowed people like Steve Jones and Judy Wood to obfuscate the true method of destruction of the WTC buildings with bogus claims of non-explosive nanothermite and amorphous DEWs. Once one gains an understanding of concepts such as nuclear fission and alpha and beta decay, the destruction of the Twin Towers and the aftermath makes perfect sense.
690Nuclear Physics Basics
691In order to understand what happened at Ground Zero one must first have a grasp on some basic nuclear physics concepts. Fortunately there is an abundance of nuclear physics knowledge readily available on the internet. From Universe Today.com:
692There are three parts of an atom: protons, neutron, and electrons. Protons have a positive charge, electrons have a negative charge, and neutrons possess no net charge.
693Electrons are the smallest parts of the atom. They are the most numerous of the three. It has no known components or substructure, so it is an elementary particle. Its mass is 1/1836 of a proton. It is also considered to be a fermion. It has an antiparticle called the positron. The positron is identical to the electron except that it carries opposite charge. When an electron collides with a positron, both particles will either scatter or be destroyed producing gamma ray photons. Electrons can collide with other particles and be diffracted like light. Two electrons cannot occupy the same quantum state based on the Pauli Exclusion Principle.
694The proton is the part of an atom that helps to form the nucleus and has a positive charge. Protons must have an equal number of neutrons except in the hydrogen atom where a single proton exists on its own. A proton is composed of 2 up quarks and one down quark. They are considered to be fermions and baryons. They are held together by the strong nuclear force. The number of protons in the nucleus of an atom determines the atomic number.
695A neutron is the part of an atom that holds no charge. Neutrons and protons occur in equal numbers in stable atoms except in hydrogen. Protons and neutrons are often referred to together as nucleons. If there are more neutrons than protons, then the atom is considered an isotope. If a neutron becomes free of its proton, then it becomes unstable, undergoes beta decay, and will disintegrate in an average of 15 minutes. The neutron is also important in nuclear chain reactions both natural and artificial.
696From Chemistry Explained.com:
697The nucleus is composed of protons (charge = +1; mass = 1.007 atomic mass units ([μ]) and neutrons. The number of protons in the nucleus is called the atomic number (Z) and defines which chemical element the nucleus represents. The number of neutrons in the nucleus is called the neutron number (N), whereas the total number of neutrons and protons in the nucleus is referred to as the mass number (A), where A = N + Z. The neutrons and protons are referred to collectively as nucleons. A nucleus with a given N and Z is referred to as a nuclide. Nuclides with the same atomic number are isotopes, such as 12 C and 14 C, whereas nuclides with the same N, such as 14 C and 16 O, are called isotones. Nuclei such as 14 N and 14 C, which have the same mass number, are isobars. Nuclides are designated by a shorthand notation in which one writes, that is, for a nucleus with 6 protons and 8 neutrons, one writes, or just 14 C. The size of a nucleus is approximately 1 to 10 × 10 -15m, with the nuclear radius being represented more precisely as 1.2 × A 1/3 × 10 -15m. We can roughly approximate the nucleus as a sphere and thus we can calculate its density where 1.66 × 10-27 kg is the mass of the nucleon. Thus the nuclear density is about 200,000 tons per cubic millimeter and is independent of A. Imagine a cube that is 1 mm on a side. If filled with nuclear matter, it would have a mass of about 200,000 tons. This calculation demonstrates the enormous matter/energy density of nuclei and gives some idea as to why nuclear phenomena lead to large energy releases.
698Of the 6,000 species of nuclei that can exist in the universe, about 2,700 are known, but only 270 of these are stable. The rest are radioactive, that is, they spontaneously decay. The driving force behind all radioactive decay is the ability to produce products of greater stability than one had initially. In other words, radioactive decay releases energy and because of the high energy density of nuclei, that energy release is substantial. Qualitatively we describe radioactive decay as occurring in three general ways: α -, β -, and γ -decay. Alpha-decay occurs in the heavy elements, and consists of the emission of a 4 He nucleus. Beta-decay occurs in nuclei whose N/Z ratio is different from that of a stable nucleus and consists of a transformation of neutrons into protons or vice versa to make the nucleus more stable. Gamma-decay occurs when excited nuclei get rid of some or all of their excitation energy via the emission of electromagnetic radiation, or via the radiationless transfer of energy to orbital electrons.
699Nuclear Fission
700When uranium-235 undergoes fission, the average of the fragment mass is about 118, but very few fragments near that average are found. It is much more probable to break up into unequal fragments, and the most probable fragment masses are around mass 95 and 137. Most of these fission fragments are highly unstable (radioactive), and some of them such as cesium-137 and strontium-90 are extremely dangerous when released to the environment.
701 
702 
703Cesium-137 and strontium-90 are the most dangerous radioisotopes to the environment in terms of their long-term effects. Their intermediate half-lives of about 30 years suggests that they are not only highly radioactive but that they have a long enough half-life to be around for hundreds of years. Iodine-131 may give a higher initial dose, but its short half-life of 8 days ensures that it will soon be gone. Besides its persistence and high activity, cesium-137 has the further insidious property of being mistaken for potassium by living organisms and taken up as part of the fluid electrolytes. This means that it is passed on up the food chain and re-concentrated from the environment by that process.
704Cesium-137 decay has a half-life of 30.07 years and proceeds by both beta decay and gamma emission from an intermediate state. Both the electron and gamma emissions are highly ionizing radiation. The gamma radiation is very penetrating, and the beta radiation, though very short range, is very dangerous when ingested because it deposits all that energy in a very short distance in tissue.
705 
706 
707Cesium’s danger as an environmental hazard, damaging when ingested, is made worse by its mimicking of potassium’s chemical properties. This ensures that cesium as a contaminant will be ingested, because potassium is needed by all living things.
708Strontium-90 and cesium-137 are the radioisotopes which should be most closely guarded against release into the environment. They both have intermediate half-lives of around 30 years, which is the worst range for half-lives of radioactive contaminants. It ensures that they are not only highly radioactive but also have a long enough half-life to be around for hundreds of years. Strontium-90 mimics the properties of calcium and is taken up by living organisms and made a part of their electrolytes as well as deposited in bones. As a part of the bones, it is not subsequently excreted like cesium-137 would be. It has the potential for causing cancer or damaging the rapidly reproducing bone marrow cells.
709Strontium-90 is not quite as likely as cesium-137 to be released as a part of a nuclear reactor accident because it is much less volatile, but isprobably the most dangerous component of the radioactive fallout from a nuclear weapon.
710Strontium-90 undergoes beta decay, emitting electrons with energy 0.546 MeV with a half-life of 28.8 years. The decay product is yttrium-90.
711Beta Decay
712Radiation and Radioactive Decay:
713 
714 
715Beta particles are electrons or positrons (electrons with positive electric charge, or anti-electrons). Beta decay occurs when, in a nucleus with too many protons or too many neutrons, one of the protons or neutrons is transformed into the other. In beta minus decay, a neutron decays into a proton, an electron, and an anti-neutrino: n Æ p + e – +. In beta plus decay, a proton decays into a neutron, a positron, and a neutrino: p Æ n + e+ +n. Both reactions occur because in different regions of the Chart of the Nuclides, one or the other will move the product closer to the region of stability. These particular reactions take place because conservation laws are obeyed. Electric charge conservation requires that if an electrically neutral neutron becomes a positively charged proton, an electrically negative particle (in this case, an electron) must also be produced. Similarly, conservation of lepton number requires that if a neutron (lepton number = 0) decays into a proton (lepton number = 0) and an electron (lepton number = 1), a particle with a lepton number of -1 (in this case an antineutrino) must also be produced. The leptons emitted in beta decay did not exist in the nucleus before the decay–they are created at the instant of the decay.
716To the best of our knowledge, an isolated proton, a hydrogen nucleus with or without an electron, does not decay. However within a nucleus, the beta decay process can change a proton to a neutron. An isolated neutron is unstable and will decay with a half-life of 10.5 minutes. A neutron in a nucleus will decay if a more stable nucleus results; the half-life of the decay depends on the isotope. If it leads to a more stable nucleus, a proton in a nucleus may capture an electron from the atom (electron capture), and change into a neutron and a neutrino.
717Proton decay, neutron decay, and electron capture are three ways in which protons can be changed into neutrons or vice-versa; in each decay there is a change in the atomic number, so that the parent and daughter atoms are different elements. In all three processes, the number A of nucleons remains the same, while both proton number, Z, and neutron number, N, increase or decrease by 1.
718In beta decay the change in binding energy appears as the mass energy and kinetic energy of the beta particle, the energy of the neutrino, and the kinetic energy of the recoiling daughter nucleus. The energy of an emitted beta particle from a particular decay can take on a range of values because the energy can be shared in many ways among the three particles while still obeying energy and momentum conservation.
719Cherenkov Radiation
720Is there an equivalent of the sonic boom for light?
721 
722When a charged particle does move through a medium at a speed higher than the speed of light in that medium, a faint radiation is produced by the medium.  In water, for example, the charged particle excites the water molecules, which then return to their normal state by emitting photons of blue light.  Because the particle is moving faster than the speed of light in water, it can trigger a cascade of photons that are in phase with each other and can interfere constructively to form a visible blue glow.
723 
724 
725 
726Nuclear Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility, Cherenkov Radiation, Hanford Site, U.S. Department of Energy, Southeastern Washington State
727Cesium-137 and Strontium-90 Capsules
728In the early 1970s operators at the Hanford, Washington, site removed a large fraction of the Cs-137 and Sr-90 from the site’s high-level tank waste in order to reduce the requirements for cooling the tanks. The cesium and strontium were concentrated and sealed in stainless steel (SS) capsules for potential uses, for example, thermoelectric generators and sterilizers. The expected applications for the Hanford capsules did not materialize and ceased entirely in 1988 after one capsule being used in the commercial sector was found to be leaking (USNRC, 1989).
729In the capsules, cesium is in the form of cesium chloride (CsCl) and strontium as strontium fluoride (SrF2). The chemical composition has been described as being relatively uniform (NRC, 1997b). Each cesium capsule contains on average approximately 35,000 Ci of Cs-137 plus an unspecified amount of Cs-135 estimated to be 0.7 Ci and produces approximately 190 W of heat. Each strontium capsule contains approximately 33,000 Ci of Sr-90 and produces approximately 260 W of heat.
730The blue glow from the cesium-137 and strontium-90 capsules is due to Cherenkov radiation.
731Cesium-137 Glows Blue
732Majia Nadesan has a blog post that discusses the Goiânia accident where a scavenger punctured a radiotherapy device containing cesium-137 with a screwdriver. A deep blue light came out of the hole.
733 
734Cesium and Strontium in the USGS Dust Samples
735Both cesium and strontium were found in abundance in the USGS dust samples. Both cesium-137 and strontium-90 undergo β− decay. Cesium-137 decays into barium-137m and strontium-90 decays into yttrium-90. Barium and yttrium were also found in abundance in the USGS dust samples. There can be little doubt that the ominous blue glow in the above picture of Ground Zero is from Cherenkov radiation.
736Tribute in Light
737 
738The Tribute in Light was first presented on March 11, 2002, six months after 9/11. The light memorial was done to provide a cover story for the blue light in the sky.
739Conclusions
740There can be no doubt that nuclear fission chain reactions took place at Ground Zero on 9/11. Fission products cesium and strontium were found in the USGS dust samples. These radioactive elements underwent beta minus decay and released high energy electrons. This is what caused the blue glow (Cherenkov radiation) over Ground Zero. Jet fuel, nanothermite or a Tesla inspired DEW have no explanatory power for beta minus decay and Cherenkov radiation.
741GLOSSARY OF TERMS:
742Nuclear Weapons Glossary
743©2013 by Ara Barsamian, NNPI
744High Explosive:chemical explosive that has high detonation velocity, usually in excess of 6000 m/s
745Hohlraum: black body cavity, same as hydrogen bomb radiation confinement case
746Hollow Boosting: refers to fission yield enhancement in a hollow fissile material pit filled with D+T boost gas that releases copious amounts of thermonuclear neutrons
747Hydrodynamics: branch of Fluid Dynamics that explores behavior of materials under intense shock pressure; extensively used in implosion calculations to calculate time-dependent compression of pit or canned TN assembly, and thus, supercriticality or thermonuclear burn rate
748IHE: Insensitive High Explosive, a very safe type of explosive that can be detonated only by a strong shock; a bullet impact will have no effect
749Implosion: uniform squeezing of matter by shock waves or radiation. It can be in 3 dimensions (spherical), 2 dimensions (cylindrical), or 1 dimension (linear)
750Implosion-type weapon: assembly of fissile core material by explosive-driven implosion
751Initiator: device that provides a squirt of neutrons to start or “initiate” a divergent chain reaction in a super-prompt critical fissile core assembly. There are two basic types: internal Polonium-Beryllium types (original name “Urchin”), and external neutron generator tubes (original name “zipper”
752Interstage: usually material containing BeO which absorbs the primary x-rays and re-radiates lower wavelength x-rays over longer time for a more complete secondary assembly implosion and compression
753Interval Time: time between the fission primary emission of radiation and the production of thermonuclear output
754Isentropic Compression: replaces shock compression with a smooth continuous pressure increase using soft, layered impactors, thereby decreasing heating and allowing much greater compression. Increases yields by a factor of 2 or 3…
755Lens: a binary explosive device, where the difference in detonation velocity results in refractive shaping of the output detonation wave; used in early implosion weapons to produce spherical implosions. Superseded by air lenses, flat lenses, and multi-point laser detonation systems.
756Levitation: method using a gap between fissile core and tamper, allowing tamper to gain momentum before slamming into the pit; the result is much higher compression due to amplification by the hammer (E=mv2/2) effect
757Lithium: metal used either to breed Tritium in reactors to make boost gas, or used in Lithium Deuteride thermonuclear fuel; Li6 isotope has higher cross-section than natural Li7 and is the preferred TN fuel in miniaturized warheads, but both produce Tritium. Ignorance of Li7 cross-section caused the Castle Bravo TN bomb test in 1954 to run away by a factor of 3 yielding 15 MT.
758Lithium Deuteride: solid gray salt used as TN fuel in the secondary assembly of a thermonuclear explosive. Usually the Li is enriched to 40 to 60% Li6. Sometime the Li6D is spiked with Tritium ( Sakharov’s 1953 Sloika layer cake design used Li6DT)
759Margin: the additional yield of a fission explosive beyond what is needed to drive the explosion of the thermonuclear secondary assembly to full yield
760Multipoint Detonation System: replaces the bulky lensed spherical high explosive implosion assembly with multiple individual detonators on the surface of HE sphere. Used successfully in UK in very compact and lightweight Octopus/ super-Octopus system; used in China’s first HEU implosion test (252 detonators). Currently implemented using a high power semiconductor laser and fiber optics cables.
761Neutron Initiator: see Initiator
762Neptunium: produced in reactors as a by-product, isotope 237 is fissile and can also be used in fission explosives
763NTS: Nevada Test Site, used for testing nuclear weapons
764Neutron Generator: an integrated assembly of a neutron tube, power supply, timers and triggering system. Some power supplies are electronic, some are explosive ferroelectric or magnetocumulative generators
765Neutron Tube: see External Neutron Source
766Neutronics: branch of nuclear reactor theory concerned with criticality calculations, such as the variation of degree of criticality with core compression by high explosives
767NW: Nuclear weapon
768PAL: Permissive Action Link, a mechanical or electronic combination lock preventing the use of a nuclear weapon by unauthorized persons; currently using crypto chips
769PBX: Plastic Bonded Explosive, a mix of HE powder pressed together with a plastic binder to make easily handled and machined parts
770Pit: the central metal core assembly containing an inner fissile shell of Pu or HEU, usually flashed with gold or Nickel, and an outer shell of either stainless steel, Beryllium, or Vanadium, or a combination; see also Core, and FRP
771Pit Tube: a thin stainless steel tube carrying boost gas from the reservoir to the hollow core of the pit at the time of detonation
772Plasma: fourth state of matter, whereby the material is completely ionized
773Plutonium: element 94. The isotope 239 sustains fast neutron chain reaction and is the fissile material used in fission explosives. Reactors also produce the isotope 240 material, fissionable only by fast neutrons, which has high spontaneous neutron emission that could cause pre-initiation and fizzle yield.
774PNE: peaceful nuclear explosives; typically minimizes fission products
775Polonium: a high emitter of alpha particles with a half life of 138 days; it was used in combination with Beryllium to generate neutrons for initiating a fission chain reaction
776Pre-detonation: detonation of fission explosive before the optimum time, usually before achieving maximum compression of fission core because of high rate of spontaneous fission – see Pre-initiation
777Pre-heating: the heating of TN secondary assembly by fission primary before radiation implosion is completed, leading to reduced compression and TN fizzle yield
778Pre-initiation: initiation before the optimum time, usually before achieving maximum compression of fission core; causes significant decrease in yield, usually a “fizzle” yield
779Primary: primary bomb, usually a fission explosive providing the soft x-ray radiation driving the implosion of a secondary (thermonuclear) bomb to achieve high compression
780Radiation Case: metal case containing the primary radiation long enough to implode the secondary; usually stainless steel, aluminum, or plastic with Uranium or Lead coating. Also known as a hohlraum
781Radiation Implosion: thermal X-rays from a fission explosive cause ablation of the TN secondary assembly surface, thus driving a strong implosion and high compression of the assembly to make it yield most of the explosive energy. AKA Teller-Ulam principle
782Radiation Implosion Compression Mechanism: in the initial US design, the radiation heated a radiation channel filler (foam) to a plasma that pushed against the secondary assembly to compress it (like steam pressure against turbine blades). Radiation driven ablation was discovered accidentally when trying to miniaturize a warhead by using a secondary with a Beryllium-reflected HEU wrap around the LiD fuel and sparkplug; Be is a very good ablator (very high velocity of ablated ejecta) thus providing much greater compression and increased yield from a smaller secondary assembly than “exploding” foam. Latest designs used “doped” or profiled ablators to provide a near isentropic compression, similar to laser fusion capsules. In UK and France, the initial design used the “explosive pusher” concept, where the external metal layer (iron) around the secondary was heated by the thermal x-rays, half blowing outwards, the other half pushing inside, for modest compression.
783Reactor-grade Plutonium: Plutonium produced in power reactors with a high content (greater than 20%) of the undesirable isotope 240; unfortunately still a good nuclear explosive material
784Reflector: material that reflects neutrons; a good reflector surrounding a fissile core decreases the critical mass of fissile material. Best core reflector is Beryllium metal
785Reservoirs: metal containers, usually stainless steel, storing boost gas, deuterium and tritium, under high pressure or absorbed in metals as hydrides
786RV: missile re-entry vehicle, housing the nuclear warhead and the arming, fuzing, and firing system, and interface to the missile “bus”
787Secondary: secondary or auxiliary bomb, a physically separate component containing thermonuclear fuel such as Lithium Deuteride surrounded by a fusion tamper such as natural Uranium or, for increased yield in a compact package, HEU. Known as Canned Sub-Assembly (CSA)
788Separation: process of enriching an element in the percentage of the desired isotope
789Shocks: a steep pressure wave, generated by explosives, ballistic impact, electrostatic implosion, etc.
790Shot: a nuclear test explosion
791SNM: special nuclear material, same as fissile material, Plutonium 239, or HEU
792Sparkplug: informal term denoting a fissile core inside a thermonuclear (TN) fuel container that is used to start the thermonuclear burn in the previously compressed TN fuel. Initially used Plutonium, currently HEU
793Spontaneous Fission: typically natural spontaneous nuclear fission of Uranium 238 or Plutonium 240 nuclei producing high level of neutron background; main cause of pre-detonation
794Sprytron: a gas filled triggered spark-gap tube used as an ultra fast switch to fire the detonators
795SRD: Secret Restricted Data, one of the numerous information classification categories
796Staging: physical separation of the primary fission stage from the TN secondary stage to allow time for radiation implosion and prevent its destruction by primary material debris
797Stockpile: quantity of nuclear weapons ready for use
798SSS: Science-based Stockpile Stewardship, a program whereby the stockpile can be certified using computer simulations and statistical sampling and dissection of stockpiled weapons that they are reliable and safe without nuclear testing
799About these ads
800RELATED
801Mini-Neutron Bombs: A Major Piece of the 9/11 PuzzleIn "9/11"
802Mystery Solved: The WTC Was Nuked on 9/11In "9/11"
803Hard Evidence Supports the Hypothesis that Mini-Nukes Were Used to Demolish the WTC TowersIn "9/11"
804This entry was posted in 9/11 and tagged cesium-137, Cherenkov radiation, Ground Zero, strontium-90by Don. Bookmark the permalink.
8052 THOUGHTS ON “RAINBOW IN THE DARK: POWERFUL PROOF OF 9/11 NUKES”
8061.	 apollonian on March 26, 2015 at 9:29 PM said:
807This is certainly impressive arguments and details u present, and I’m quite at loss, one reason being I’m mere ignorant Hist. major, knowing only basic science fm high-school. Ok, but I DID think of this, even if it might not affect the argument as whole.
808And that is fact that there were some survivors who were in a stair-well in a small part of one of the WTC towers which was not vaporized, this even though everything above them was disintegrated. So wouldn’t the radiation have zapped them?–and why wouldn’t they have noted heat?–isn’t heat a necessary characteristic of nuke? Thanks much for all ur info and advice.
809o	 Donon March 29, 2015 at 7:23 AM said:
810Captain Jay Jonas was in Stairwell B and he said that he thought they had survived a nuclear attack. A big nuke would have vaporized Jay and his men. Many small bombs were used instead of one big one. They were somehow spared. They were VERY, VERY lucky.
811Comments are closed.
812https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2015/02/06/rainbow-in-the-dark-powerful-proof-of-911-nukes/
813
814 
815NUCLEAR DEVICES USED AT WTC GROUND ZERO
816 (Please wait for page to load it has a lot of content)
817  
818   
819Please scroll down to see the photographs of the melted rock nuclear detonation crater at wtc.
820Please note that some of the videos below were removed by youtube.
821I let them remain so you can try to find the information with the titles and so that you can see what they are hiding from you on youtube.
822 
823See photos of Nuke crater at bottom..
824Be sure to check out my other article here
825WTC Constructed to be Nuclear Device Chimneys
826https://911justicehalifax.wordpress.com/2012/09/10/wtc-constructed-to-be-nuclear-device-chimneys/
827WTC Constructed to be Nuclear Device Chimneys Audio-Video transcript with added must hear commentary by A Truth Soldier
828https://911justicehalifax.wordpress.com/2012/06/07/wtc-was-demolished-by-hydrogen-bomb/
829 
830Nuclear Demolition of the WTC: Too Much Tritium i.e fission bomb yield booster
831https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73eNo2UbCY8
832Source video
83304 – Phenomena
834https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3nwzX0A2GU&feature=c4-overview-vl&list=PLEA05F393EC843D80
835Dimitri Khalezov WTC Nuclear Demolition
8361 – 26 THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT
837http://nucleardemolition.com/
838http://www.dimitri-khalezov-video.com/
839  
840Third Truth about 9/11 – 911thology FULL version of Dimitri Khalezov’s book is RELEASED!
841Published on Aug 27, 2013
842Links are blow. Please, download this book on nuclear demolition of the WTC and re-distribute it as widely as possible:
843http://www.mediafire.com/download/i5qvsnpdvl3ivur/9-11thology-third_truth_v4_full.zip
844http://www.mediafire.com/download/p8kdj6mhzcaccr6/9-11thology-third_truth_v4_full.zip
845https://rapidshare.com/desktop/download/812p1/3252256303/OS0xMXRob2xvZ3ktdGhpcmRfdHJ1dGhfdjRfZnVsbC56aXA=/143715/0/0/1/A36FD8EE1E27F46CC44855224D46F6F1/referer-A13A33AF395C05C4CD76E3032C67CFCF
846http://www.share-online.biz/dl/ZNB7H0SM5EJ
847http://ul.to/3zxme82x
848Please, download also this archive with the biggest collection of genuine “ground zero” definitions from hundreds of pre-9/11 dictionaries:
849http://www.share-online.biz/dl/65Z783SMO1V
850http://rapidshare.com/files/297710559…
851http://ul.to/kocsbtll
852http://www.911-truth.net/pre-911_dictionaries_ground_zero4.zip.
853Feel free to share this with other people too!
854I urge you to create alternative download links for both of these files and share them via torrents! Please, be in a hurry, these links may not last!
855A new book on 9/11 is out, by Dimitri Khalezov
856Dimitri Khalezov has spent 10 years researching and writing a book on what happened during 9/11. The book is now available on the internet.
857Instructions for downloading his book:
858In a 2010 interview, Dimitri Khalezov explained that anyone who wants to build a skyscraper in NYC must submit a satisfactory demolition plan to the building authorities before the project is approved. On 9/11, the demolition plan of the World Trade Center (‘WTC’) was activated to destroy the complex.
859He knew of this demolition plan from his job in the Soviet Union. He had worked in the nuclear intelligence unit and under an agreement between the Soviet Union and the USA, each country was obliged to inform the other of peaceful uses of nuclear explosions. The WTC was constructed with built-in explosive charges for its eventual demolition – 3 thermo-nuclear devices were placed within the foundations of the complex for this purpose.
860More info on the author:
861http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_154.htm
862The links for the 2010 interview are at the end of the webpage.
863In # 4, Khalezov talks of the demolition plan of the WTC.
864In # 14, he explains what happened to Building 7 (which fell down nearly half an hour AFTER the BBC reporter announced its collapse).
865Khalezov was recently interviewed on the Mike Harris show on 4th September 2013:
866http://www.renseradioarchives.com/harris/
8679/11 Solved – YouTube – This Playlist http://tinyurl.com/ctsynm7
868Support Evidence for Dimitri Khalezov’s 9/11 Testimony
869     
870http://ac31.blogspot.ca/2011/09/support-ing-evidence-for-dimitri.html
871http://theunhivedmind.com/wordpress/?p=5464
872Support Evidence for Dimitri Khalezov’s 9/11 Testimony
873Share this article:
874http://ac31.blogspot.com/2011/09/support-ing-evidence-for-dimitri.html
875http://tinyurl.com/432w33o
876Share on YouTube: tinyurl (dot) com/432w33o
877The following links provide additional support evidence for Dimitri Khalezov’s 9/11 testimony. Watch the full 2 part documentary interview below called “9/11: The Third Truth – Dimitri Khalezov” and review the detailed “Nuclear Demolition – WikiSpooks” article to learn about Dimitri’s testimony and detailed explanation of how the WTC buildings were demolished using built-in underground nuclear devices. In his interview, Dimitri explains details about virtually all events that unfolded on the day 9/11 and leaves no stone unturned.
878lluminatti Playing Cards
879 
8809-11: NUKES~DEWS~THERMATE~FISSION~FUSION ?!?
881Published on Oct 18, 2013
882Fission elements found in WTC dust.
883Barium and Strontium: Neither of these elements should ever appear in building debris in these quantities. The levels never fall below 400ppm for
884Barium and they never drop below 700ppm for Strontium and reach over
8853000ppm for both in the dust sample taken at Broadway and John Streets.
886Thorium and Uranium: These elements only exist in radioactive form. Thorium is a radioactive element formed from Uranium by decay. It’s very rare and should not be present in building rubble, ever. So once again we have verifiable evidence that a nuclear fission event has taken place.
887Lithium: With the presence of lithium we have compelling evidence that this fission pathway of Uranium to Thorium and Helium, with subsequent decay of the Helium into Lithium has taken place. Lanthanum: Lanthanum is the next element in the disintegration pathway of the element Barium.
888Yttrium: The next decay element after Strontium, which further confirms the presence of Barium. Chromium: The presence of Chromium is one more “tell tale” signature of a nuclear detonation.
889Combined with the elevated tritium levels (35 to 55 x normal) discovered on 9-11 on the WTC site & the symptoms of the first responders (hair loss, tooth loss, soars, rare bone marrow & blood cell cancers previously linked to radiation exposure) we have a good amount of evidence nuclear weapons were used on the WTC site.
890Very possibly in combination with conventional explosives/incendiaries. Additionally, highly localized EMP evidence is a sign of ground level/near ground level detonations. The #1 factor in the development of the EMP side effect is the altitude of the detonation (the size of the device is key as well, obviously).
891With a ground level detonation the EMP will be highly localized & far less sever than with a high altitude detonation.
892http://old.911digitalarchive.org/crr/documents/4339.pdf
893Facing up to the fact that much of the Twin Towers did in fact VAPORIZE as there is evidence that HIGH tech / LOW yield NUCLEAR DEVICES may have played a roll in both of the DEMOLITIONS.
894http://911scholars.ning.com/profiles/blogs/mult¬iple-myeloma-in-first-responders-the-det¬ails-of-death
895In the general population Myeloma occurs at the rate of 3-9 per 100,000 people. That rate also occurs 99% of the time in people over 65 with an average age of 71. Just 1% are ever under the age of 65 in the general population. In the population of 40,000 First Responders the rate is 1 in 534 people. This means 75 First Responders have died from Myeloma.
896What’s more, they have all been between 37 and 60 years of age with most under 55. These are extraordinary figures, unprecedented. Worse, there are approximately 8,000 sick First Responders today and many that have already died have succumbed to not one, not two, but sometimes 3 different rare cancers.
897http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6955540
898Multiple myeloma among atomic bomb survivors in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1950-76: relationship to radiation dose absorbed by marrow.
899Start here, watch these videos and see the WikiSpooks article:
900Ace Baker proves no planes hit WTC on 9/11
901 
902Dimitri Khalezov – WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length]
903Published on May 23, 2012 by MainstreamSmasherTV
904Dimitri Khalezov – WTC Nuclear Demolition 1 to 26
905a groundbreaking interview of an ex officer of the Soviet nuclear intelligence
906exposing the truth of the 9/11 events
907This Video series has been censored all through the web.
908Why I believe nuclear demolition fits all the evidence we know about.
909They didn’t call it “ground zero” for nothing! Before 911, ground zero only meant the area below or above a nuclear detonation, after 911, they changed some of the dictionaries to say it was also the place where terrorists attacked the trade centers. It’s all mind control.
910Dimitri Khalezov has been an expert in nuclear demolition for many years and has an incredible amount of proof that the buildings were taken down by underground micro nuclear demolition charges! I’ve posted some links to other material such as the melted cars that could have only been done by EMP type effects caused by a nuclear bomb since there was no jet fuel burning at ground level AND some of these cars were missing engine blocks!
911They were totally melted! How do you melt an engine block when no fire was burning at ground level – many of these cars were 7 blocks away! They were never explained in any way. Also it was never explained why Tritium levels were 55 times more than normal at ground zero. And of course we have ALL the strange cancers from first responders and many of them have died.
912They were forced to wear “air quality” badges which Dimitri says were really just radiation detectors in disguise so they could monitor everybody’s exposure and pull people out of the hot zones for a while when their badges reported higher radiation. Easy to lie to everybody and tell them the badge is to monitor air quality. That is pure garbage if you think about it. There is not going to be that much difference in “air quality around such a relatively small area anyway.
913Dimitri even said that in the 70’s he was told that the Americans had authorized the twin towers to be taken down at the end of their lifetimes with small nuclear demolition charges! I did some research and it was true! It was determined that only a nuclear demolition charge could safely bring down both Towers and Building 7 because of their construction. Here’s some good information on nuclear demolition
9149/11: The Third Truth – Dimitri Khalezov (Full Interview)
915Click this link and the whole series will play continuously
916http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PL75BE9760A0DABE1F&feature=player_detailpage&v=BVI6a1wUzvI
9179/11: The Third Truth (Part 1 of 2)
918https://www.youtube.com/anthonyc31?v=vNuKAdGlxFo
919Phone Call to Dimitri- 911 Nuclear Demolitions – Re-edited
920http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=CA&v=xHRBrYd_u90[/embed]
921 
922Nuclear Demolition – WikiSpooks (Article with diagrams explaining WTC demolition)
923http://wikispooks.com/wiki/Nuclear_Demolition
924Additional support videos:
925Short video featuring Dimitri’s explanation of digital planes and WTC demolition
926 
927 
928The Destruction – Part 1/2 – YouTube
929The Destruction – Part 2/2
930911 WTC nuclear demolition (Detailed summary of original 26-part Dimitri interview)
931http://factsnotfairies.blogspot.com/2010/03/911-wtc-nuclear-demolition.html
932My full research on 9/11 can be found here:
933http://www.scribd.com/doc/82151575/
934Dimitri Khalezov Support Evidence
935 DOCUMENT
936http://www.scribd.com/doc/57511798/Proof-of-Advanced-Fission-Devices-used-in-New-York-City-on-Sept-11th-2001-By-Jeff-Prager
937The Office of the Inspector General of the United States Environmental Protection Agencythe White House and the White House Council on Environmental Quality and
938the 1,000+ Deaths (1,003 – March 1, 2011 Approx.) That Have Resulted From The Attack Of September 11th, 2001 All of WhichHave Occurred Since That Date
939Impact of the September 11th Attack on Air Quality and Public Health in Lower Manhattan
940Supplement To ‘Report Docket No. NIOSH 227JP’ This Report is ‘Report Docket No. NIOSH 227JP2’
941March 15, 2011 Jeff Prager
942Cover Photo © FEMA 2001 – Most rescue were not encouraged to wear respirators or breathing apparatus or even simple dust masks because the air was ‘safe’ to breathe based on EPA statements.
943This report, submitted to NIOSH under Docket Number NIOSH-227, Request for information on Conditions Relating to Cancer to consider for the World Trade Cen-ter Health Program and titled, “Report Docket No. NIOSH 227 JP2” uses publicly available data and references a previous report by the same author sent to NIOSHon March 14, 2011 titled, “Report Docket No. NIOSH 227 JP” and sent in PDFformat to and received by Diane M. Miller, NIOSH Docket Offcer, 513/533-8450 at dmm2@cdc.gov.
944The report was originally sent to: niocindocket@cdc.gov as re-quested.Summary
945This report in conjunction with the previous report mentioned above provides con-clusive evidence that the events of September 11th, 2001 were nuclear in nature,that is, fission occurred in NYC on September 11th.
946The relationship to a variety of human cancers and radioactivity are well-known and well documented.
947This reportsummarizes those relationships and seeks to provide the necessary data such thatall cancers associated with Ground Zero Rescue Workers included in any medical compensation package adopted by the US federal government, the National Institutefor Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the Centers For Disease Control andPrevention (CDC), related to the WTC Health Program established by the JamesZadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act (Pub. L. 111-347) are completely andfully covered.
948This is, very simply, the right thing to do.
949While this and the previous report submitted promote and espouse that radiationexposure was experienced, that conclusion is not necessary to or a part of the as-sertions in this 2nd report.
950This report is based, very simply, on the composition of the Ground Zero dust based on Scanning Electron Microscopy by the United StatesGeological Survey and posted to the internet as Open Source material and the belief that radiation was a component of the Ground Zero dust is
951not relative
952to the overallassertions in this second report.
953The EPA 9/11 pollution controversy was the result of a report released by the Of?ce of the Inspector Generalof the United States Environmental Protection Agency in August 2003 which claimed that the White House put pressure on the EPA to delete cautionary information about the air quality in New York City around Ground Zero following the September 11, 2001 attacks.
954According to the report: a September 18 EPA statement saying that the air was “safe”
9551
956was made without suffcient reliable data available; the White House Council on Environmental Quality infuenced the EPA to make reassuring comments to the public; and on September 12
957the EPA Administrator issued a memo saying that all statements to the media must be cleared by the National Security Council. Numerous key differences between the draft versions and final versions of EPA statements were found.
958A recommendation that homes and businesses near ground zero be cleaned by professionals was replaced by a request that citizens follow orders from NYC offcials.
959Another statement that showed concerns about “sensitive populations”was deleted altogether.
960Language used to describe excessive amounts of asbestos in the area was altered drastically to minimize attention to the dangers it posed.
9612
962The news of the report created a short-lived backlash against the administration. Especially angered were NewYorkers who lived near the site of the attacks.
963Even a year after 9/11 some 7,000 rescue workers were believed to be suffering from Ground Zero illness: respiratory ailments caused by the dust, the initial stages of various cancers and other related debilitating illness and to date 1,003 have died.
964Many cleaning efforts by government and private agencies on homes and businesses were accused of being inadequate.
9653
966Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton and Joseph I. Lieberman sent a letter to President George W. Bush concerning his administration’s alleged intervention in internal EPA affairs.
9674
968In an interview with Katie Couric for 60 Minutes, former EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman criticized NYC authorities for not forcing rescue workers to wear respirators, as EPA did not have the legal authority.
969She also defended her own record and denied the claim that her agency lied about air quality surrounding Ground Zero: Whitman stated, “The last thing in the world that I would ever do would be to put people at risk.
970Of all the criticisms that I had in my career … this is by far the most personally troubling.
971You want to say, ‘You’re wrong.’ We never lied.”
9725
973However, Whitman’s claims were contradicted by Cate Jenkins, a senior scientist at the EPA.
974In a 2006 New York Times article, Jenkins claimed that the EPA outright lied about health hazards posed by alkalinity, or pH level, of the dust levels at Ground Zero.
9756
976In September 2006 the US House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security held a two day long hearing on the subject of illnesses caused by post-9/11 air quality.
9777
978Whitman, the EPA, and New York City weretargets of blame.
9797
9801. “EPA Response to September 11”
981http://www.epa.gov/oig/reports/2003/WTC_report_20030821.pdf
9822. Laurie Garrett (2003-08-23). “EPA Misled Public on 9/11 Pollution
983http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0823-03.htm
9843. Francesca Lyman (Sept. 11, 2003). “Anger builds over EPA’s 9/11 report”
985http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3076626
986—————————————————————————-
9879-11 – The Great American Psy-Opera
988See complete series here.
989https://911justicehalifax.wordpress.com/2012/12/13/9-11-the-great-american-psy-opera/
99004 – Phenomena
991 
992
993
994Radioactive tritium, strontium and barium, molecular dissociation, mushroom cloud, 1400 melted motor vehicles, China syndrome, rare cancers . . . the evidence is overwhelming, and it doesn’t point to thermite any more than it points to a gravity collapse.
995            
996Nuclear destruction of the WTC
997
998Evidence of Advanced Fusion Devices at the WTC
999http://www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/evidence.htm
1000China Syndrome at the WTC
1001http://wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com/
1002 
1003WTC buildings collapsed to dust
10049/11 Firefighter Interview- “Collapsed to Dust”
1005The Towers of Dust
1006WTC 2 South tower collapse slow motion HD
10079/11 Debris: Investigation of Ground Zero, Pt. 1 – EXCELLENT
10089/11 Debris: Investigation of Ground Zero, Pt. 2 (v. 2) – EXCELLENT
10099/11 Rare World Trade Center Collapse Footage – (Dust)
1010Damage to the WTC “Bathtub”
1011Workers Rush To Repair Huge Hole In WTC ‘Bathtub’ – NY1.com
1012http://www.ny1.com/content/top_stories/20029/workers-rush-to-repair-huge-hole-in-wtc–bathtub-
1013The Fetzer – Khalezov Interview 8/10
1014The Fetzer – Khalezov Interview 9/10
1015Super high temperatures at and below Ground Zero
10169/11: Molten Metal at Ground Zero
1017Molten metal WTC
1018Molten metal in basements 911 Demolition
1019Molten Metal Flows at Ground Zero
1020Bedrock at WTC Tower 4
1021iCe Age pothole found at Wtc ground Zero
1022Ice Age Landscapes in Lower Manhattan – The New York Times
1023http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2008/10/06/nyregion/06rock_index.html
10249/11 Digital Deception – No planes hit the WTC towers
1025(AA 11 and WTC 1, United 175 and WTC 2)
1026Excellent analysis of 9/11 video and image footage
1027Ace Baker proves no planes hit WTC on 9/11
1028 
10299/11 – The Great American Psy-Opera
1030Theory of Live 9/11 Airplane Composites – VIDEOS
1031I present a demonstration of the technique used to create the two live 9/11 video composites, first Chopper 7, then Chopper 5.
1032http://acebaker.blogspot.ca/2008/05/theory-of-live-911-airplane-composites.html
10339/11 NOSE OUT – Simon Shack proves no plane hit WTC 2
10349/11 NOSE OUT – Calculations prove no plane hit WTC 2
1035(see “Pythagoras” article)
1036http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6McmbkBIKw[/embed]
1037Article: Pythagoras Exposes Phantom Flight UA175 as a Hoax (excellent)
1038http://911logic.blogspot.ca/2006_10_01_archive.html
1039More analysis of the fake WTC airplane videos and images
1040September Clues – Main site
1041http://septemberclues.info/
1042FAQ 1: The Official TV Archives
1043http://septemberclues.info/faq_1.htm
1044FAQ 2: The “Amateur” Imagery
1045http://septemberclues.info/faq_2.htm
1046FAQ 3: Alleged Flights and Passengers
1047http://septemberclues.info/faq_3.htm
1048FAQ 4:The Eye-Witnesses
1049http://septemberclues.info/faq_4.htm
1050Further Video Analyses
1051http://septemberclues.info/further_analyses.htm
1052Alternative calculations to above “Pythagoras” video and article (4 Images)
1053http://www.flickr.com/photos/anthonyc31/6186525744/lightbox/
1054http://www.flickr.com/photos/anthonyc31/6186001025/lightbox/
1055http://www.flickr.com/photos/anthonyc31/6186525852/lightbox/
1056http://www.flickr.com/photos/anthonyc31/6186001745/lightbox/
1057No real Planes @ 911
1058911 “Nose Out” Plane Cameraman interview Suggests TV Fakery is Reality
1059Fake Planes 911 an Established Fact…Video by PAGANlNO
1060911 taboo genghis 6199
1061
1062Analysis of impossible plane speeds and maneuvers at Sea Level
10639/11 pilots say “NO WAY”!
1064“UA175 Aircraft” Speed Analysis – Article
1065http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/ggua175/speed/
10669/11 WTC impossible speeds confirmed
1067Pilots for 9/11 Truth: Airplane speed
1068911 truth 767 Pilot say’s no way the planes or terrorist are real
1069
1070Pentagon hit by Missile, not a plane
1071(AA 77 @ Pentagon)
1072The 9-11 Pentagon Hoax. Why It Wasn’t Hit By A Boeing 747.
1073http://www.apfn.net/messageboard/06-14-04/discussion.cgi.51.html
1074The pentagon was not hit by a airliner. See for yourself
10759/11 Pentagon NO fatalities NO dead passengers
1076Former 9/11 Commissioner admits missile hit the Pentagon
1077
10789/11 Truth: Pentagon Eyewitness Bob Pugh Tells His Story
1079April Gallup – Was there a bomb in the Pentagon?
1080
1081Missile Damage To Pentagon – Article
1082http://911lies.org/full_size_911_pentagon_attack_damage5.html
1083Pentagon Crash?- Article
1084http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/pentagon.htm
1085High-Ranking Army Officer – Missile Hit Pentagon:
1086Radiation Expert Claims High-Radiation Readings Near Pentagon
1087After 9/11 Indicates Depleted Uranium Used- Article
1088http://www.rense.com/general67/radfdf.htm
1089Radiation & Another One Of Those Endless 911 ‘Coincidences’…- Article
1090http://www.rense.com/general76/rad.htm
1091Critical Analysis of the Pentagon Building Performance Report
1092http:/www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/asce_en.html
1093Plane shot down over Shanksville, PA, plane did not “crash”
1094(“United Flight 93”)
1095911 FOX reports Flight 93 shot down by an F-16
1096from the US National Air Guard
1097Russian NTV reports flight 93 shot down –
1098missing piece of 9/11 evidence !
1099Awake and United 9-11 Truth! – Dick Cheney Shanksville
1100‪Rumsfeld ‘s Accidental Slip of the Tongue,
1101Flight 93 shot down!‬‏
1102Award for man who shot down Flight 93 on 9/11
1103http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=849733852763313874
1104NORAD Confirms 9 11 Footage of Flight 93 crashing
1105(Shot Down) near Camp David
1106Flight 93 Eyewitness Sees A Second Plane,
1107Says Flight 93 Was Shot Down
11089/11 Shanksville Eyewitness Susan McElwain
1109Eyewitness to Shanksville Crash – It Was Not a 757
1110
1111United Airlines Flight 93 Shot Down
1112http://piratenews.org/flight93.html
1113Alleged “Hijackers” are alive and well
1114BBC NEWS | Middle East | Hijack ‘suspects’ alive and well – Article
1115http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm
1116Revealed: the men with stolen identities – Telegraph
1117http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/saudiarabia/1341391/Revealed-the-men-with-stolen-identities.html
1118The 9/11 hijackers are alive
11199/11 Hijackers ALIVE!
11209/11 Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake
1121Other interviews with Dimitri Khalezov
1122Jim Fetzer (very good)
1123The Fetzer – Khalezov Interview 1/10
1124(Jim Fetzer introduction)
1125The Fetzer – Khalezov Interview 2/10
1126(WTC 7 complex preparation, Judy Wood “Energy Weapon” discussed)
1127The Fetzer – Khalezov Interview 3/10
1128(Nuclear detonation 101 and WTC 7 intro)
1129The Fetzer – Khalezov Interview 4/10
1130(WTC 7, ultra-violet absorbers, Pyrocool, ground zero hotspots)
1131The Fetzer – Khalezov Interview 5/10
1132(WTC 7 false wall explained)
1133The Fetzer – Khalezov Interview 6/10
1134(Nuclear detonation – cavity, crushed, damaged zones, pressure wave)
1135The Fetzer – Khalezov Interview 7/10
1136(WTC turned to dust, thick as tank steel, no planes)
1137The Fetzer – Khalezov Interview 8/10 
1138(WTC bathtub damage, Osama Bin Laden lie, Ground Zero)
1139The Fetzer – Khalezov Interview 9/10
1140(WTC bathtub damage, Viktor Bout, Osama Bin Laden)
1141The Fetzer – Khalezov Interview 10/10
1142(Mike Harari)
1143Dr. Deagle Show
1144Dr Deagle Show 100628 1/4 – Dimitri A. Khalezov
1145Dr Deagle Show 100628 2/4 – Dimitri A. Khalezov
1146Dr Deagle Show 100628 3/4 – Dimitri A. Khalezov
1147Dr Deagle Show 100628 4/4 – Dimitri A. Khalezov
1148Kevin Barret, Gordon Duff
11499/11 Truth: Was Mossad in Charge?
1150Kevin Barrett, Dimitri Khalezov and Gordon Duff Discuss
1151
1152(Alternate link)
11539-11 ISRAEL CONNECTION
1154Gordon Duff Interviews Russian Intel Nuclear Special Ops
1155Steve Johnson
1156Phone Call to Dimitri- 911 Nuclear Demolitions – Re-edited
1157Vinny Eastwood
1158Dimitri Khalezov – 9/11 Attacks External To U.S Intel Service (1/6)
1159Dimitri Khalezov – 9/11 Attacks External To U.S Intel Service (2/6)
1160Dimitri Khalezov – 9/11 Attacks External To U.S Intel Service (3/6)
1161Dimitri Khalezov – 9/11 Attacks External To U.S Intel Service (4/6)
1162Dimitri Khalezov – 9/11 Attacks External To U.S Intel Service (5/6)
1163Dimitri Khalezov – 9/11 Attacks External To U.S Intel Service (6/6)
1164This quote is from a fellow member posting to a discussion about Dimitri Khalezov’s documentary interview on the Prison Planet forum. This member, along with myself and two other members were eventually banned from that message board. You can review the discussion thread here:
1165http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=207923.0
1166How did 100s of thousands of ppl evacuate NYC so quickly within a time frame under 15min?? Where is all the traffic. More of the 9/11 forgery. This is just after 846 am.The first “plane.” The second “plane”was only 17 min after. That’s a quick evacuation. lol. BUMPER TO BUMPER plus pedestrians. Where are they??? How about behind the barricades already set up. Great perspective down to the street!
1167http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PL27B7A7F63F21BD6C&feature=player_embedded&v=Il1nvCtIr-U#!
1168911stealth WTC Adjacent Building Reflection Evocates Pyrocool FEF Used on Masking Radioactivity
1169Uploaded by 911stealth on 15 Nov 2010
1170Taken from 1) the Naudet documentary 9/11, 2) Bob and Bri “What We Saw”, 3) ‘Peter Strid’, and 4) tje NYPD footage.
1171Manhatite, the Radioactive Glass from the 9/11 WTC
1172http://www.cpt12.org/tv_schedule/program_details.cfm?id=120101204190000
1173Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup
1174PBS and Avery, thank you for the documentary and its script:
1175http://209.85.62.24/18/3/0/p222872/lc_9_11_disc.pdf
1176I want to contribute my ‘grain of sand’: In page 4 we read that the ‘Trinity Test’ nuclear detonation in NM “left a crater of radioactive glass 10 feet deep and a thousand feet wide”.
1177NM’s ‘radioactive glass’ = trinitite
1178http://geo-sites.zoomshare.com/files/Trinitite-5.jpg , from: http://geo-sites.zoomshare.com/files/soil-slag-clinker.htm
1179A 9/11 under-reported phenomenon is the 40ft ‘pothole’:
1180http://nucleardemolition.com/chinasyn.html
1181If you look at the left side of the crater’s picture you will see the 9/11 WTC “manhatite” radioactive glass, product of radiation by stealth, the ‘911stealth’:
1182The Military ‘Manhattan Project’ used ‘Woolworth’ (233 Broadway) and nearby places (’25’ and 270 Broadway) plus Manhattan’s underground for its secretive and lethal purposes:
1183http://nucleardemolition.com/manhattan.html
1184A final note:
1185Rather than losing time with the Zionist friendly ‘Wiki-leaks’ and ‘promoter’ Hillary (smile), read the real 9/11 ‘Oral Stories’ obtained by the legal avenue:
1186http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/met_…
1187while checking the multiple times the responders say they felt the ground shaking (underground nuclear explosion) before the fall of the twin towers and their multiple explosions above, nano-thermite coupled to the highly conductive carbon nanotubes:
1188http://s1.zetaboards.com/pumpitout/topic/3773597/1
1189something that almost everybody until now seems to be clueless about.
1190In page 10 of Avery’s script we read:
1191“The events of 9/11 were used to shape the Bush Administration’s entire foreign and domestic policy. If the details of the events are proven to be a lie, then the authenticity of the Bush Administration’s entire tenure should be in question”.
1192I recommend you to critically analyze pages 35-48, 55-67, which ends saying:
1193“…we will not go away. We will not be silent. Ask questions. Demand answers.”
1194I fear “a new investigation” will be equally corruptible as the first one… The individual conscience is more important;
1195PBS and Avery, I’ll recommend everybody to watch it!
1196911stealth Underground Toxic Dust Traveling Through Manhattan Project Facilities 3 Examples
1197The Neros and Hitlers of the past took their lives when they got busted, the Neros of today write books and appear in interviews…
1198911stealth WTC1 Nuclear Mushroom Raised at the Tower Falling
1199Clear evidence of nuclear technology used to destroy the WTC.
1200First Responders, please, don’t let money rob the truth!
1201Taken from: 
1202
1203This is my most important finding thus far.
1204911stealth – There’s Nothing Under Heaven that Sooner or Later Won’t be Known
1205‎[BOOK: “America was Nuked” (excellent, irrefutable, hard scientific evidence);
1206by Jeff Prager]
1207Part One: http://www.scribd.com/doc/88179377
1208Part Two: http://www.scribd.com/doc/88180099
1209 
1210America Nuked Part One
1211Part 1 of a physics and chemistry analysis of the USGS ground dust sampling and the UC Davis Delta Group atmospheric dust sampling from September 16th through October 30th, 2001. by j_prager2297 in Science, Research, and 91
121235 Reasons Micro-Nukes Were Utilized to Demolish the WTC Cores on 9/11
1213http://theintelhub.com/2012/06/28/35-reasons-micro-nukes-were-utilized-to-demolish-the-wtc-on-911/
1214By Spooked theintelhub.com June 28, 2012
1215Editors Note: Micro-Nukes were likely used at the base core in conduction with nano-thermite and C4. Multiple demolitions were used.
1216Related Article & Videos: 
12179/11 Cover up: Standard Controlled Demolition or Possible Micro Nukes?
1218Micro Nukes took down the Towers on 911 Pt. 1
1219Uploaded by offthahook08 on Sep 6, 2011
1220RDD-7 Nukes
1221http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/doe/rdd-7.html
1222https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?p=RDD-7+Nukes&ei=UTF-8&hspart=mozilla&hsimp=yhs-001
1223Micro Nukes took down the Towers on 911 Pt. 2
1224911 Craters M-Nukes left in the WTC site
1225Buildings vaporized, rock melted and they still insist it is kerosene jet fuel.
1226Why was it called Ground Zero?
1227Here are the reasons:
12281.	Heat generation at ground zero for six months (china syndrome)
12292.	Inability to quench ground zero heat with water
12303.	Red hot/molten steel at ground zero
12314.	Missing core columns from ground zero (vaporized during destruction)
12325.	Spreading of sand at ground zero consistent with attempts to limit radiation
12336.	Washing of steel recovered from pile consistent with radiation decontamination
12347.	Extreme security for ground zero steel shipments consistent with limiting access to radioactive steel
12358.	Extreme security at ground zero, limiting exposure, view of devastation
12369.	Extreme pulverization of WTC concrete into very fine particles
123710.	Disappearance of over one thousand human bodies from WTC debris
123811.	Disappearance of furniture, phones, filing cabinets and computers from WTC debris
123912.	Disappearance of elevator doors, office doors, office cubicle walls, toilets and sinks from WTC debris
124013.	Several floor fragments fused together in “meteorite” object
124114.	Bone fragments sprayed into Bankers Trust upper floor during destruction
124215.	Multiple blast waves during destruction of tower
124316.	Large fireballs during initiation of WTC1 destruction
124417.	Small backpack-sized fission nukes exist
124518.	Fission-nuke technology well-established
124619.	Low efficiency of fission nukes ensures leftover radioactive fragments and China syndrome
124720.	EMP formation during tower destruction (exploding cars, partial burning)
124821.	Description of heat in WTC blast cloud
124922.	Extensive cover-up of ground zero air by EPA
125023.	High rate of cancers, including thyroid cancer typically associated with radiation exposure, in ground zero responders
125124.	Melted, hanging skin in WTC survivor Felipe David in absence of fire
125225.	Vaporized press and crumpled steel door in WTC basement reported by Pecoraro
125326.	Steel beam bent in U, without cracking, evidence of extreme high temps
125427.	Steel beam bent in U has layer of molten metal on surface
125528.	Extreme overall devastation of two massive towers and blasted out Ground Zero aftermath
125629.	Appearance of fantastical, nonsensical DEW theory by likely govt agents– uses evidence of nukes (EMP, extreme pulverization of tower into dust) but denies nukes at all costs
125730.	Appearance of fantastical, nonsensical thermite (super nano-thermite) theory by likely govt agents– uses evidence of nukes (molten steel, china syndrome) but denies nukes at all costs
125831.	Small iron microspheres found by Jones et al in WTC dust— evidence of steel vaporization by high temps of nukes
125932.	Pyroclastic debris cloud during WTC destruction
126033.	Upwards jutting debris trails reminiscent of debris trails formed during underground nuke test
126134.	Small bright flashes during destruction of both towers
126235.	Extremely compacted ground zero debris
1263Spooked’s Bio: The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes.
1264The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2.
1265All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene “war on terror”, to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations.
1266Please Visit wtcdemolition.blogspot.com
12679-11-WTC-Nuclear-Demolition
1268http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnWa4UUL6Nk[/embed]
1269Uploaded on 16 Dec 2010 by KathiDecker
1270http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=75BE9760A0DABE1F
1271http://www.nuclear-demolition-wikipedia.com
1272http://www.dimitri-khalezov-video.com
1273http://www.what-is-ground-zero.com
1274http://www.nuclear-demolition.com
1275http://www.nucleardemolition.com
1276http://www.911thology.com
1277http://911taboo.net
1278Go to these two links to see and download these and many more ground zero wtc photos
1279click on first image and then move your mouse down until the hidden menu shows up at the bottom of the images then click options to download images.
1280wtc nuclear detonation pictures
1281https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.432255246795933.92955.362933107061481&type=3
1282Nuclear Demolition – Full Play List by Der Entdecker
1283wtc nuclear detonation pictures HI-RES
1284https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.432251866796271.92952.362933107061481&type=3      
1285 
1286go to this link. click on first image then hover your mouse over it. Then the options tab will appear at the bottom. There you can click to download the full sized
1287How they rigged the WTC towers for demolition (Skeptics see this)
1288Published on Jul 13, 2012
1289This version will stay up, this one contains more info and notes to the debunkers who claimed that they “debunked” this info. 
1290This video answers how they could have rigged the towers easily and why jet fuel and external damage cannot never in a million years of fire (from jet fuel) cause even a partial collapse let alone an implosion.
1291AE911truth – Experts Speak out explain it with actual science. Any “expert” that supports the official theory is either afraid for his life or career or believes that by supporting the government story he might be approached by shadow government agents and get paid for his “services”.
1292The last and most common is that people are psychologically handycapped and their brain will do anything and hold on to any pathetic argument that supports their worldview and nothing can change their mind. This psychology is what keeps most people attached to the religion they have been taught) They always find an explanation no matter how outrageously stupid it is.
1293An example: Jet fuel caused all the secondary explosions that killed and wounded people and blew up the lobby and elevators
1294Proof Fission Device Used WTC 911
1295http://www.scribd.com/doc/57511798/Proof-of-Advanced-Fission-Devices-used-in-New-York-City-on-Sept-11th-2001-By-Jeff-Prager
1296The Office of the Inspector General of the United States Environmental Protection Agency the White House and the White House Council on Environmental Quality and
1297the 1,000+ Deaths (1,003 – March 1, 2011 Approx.) That Have Resulted From The Attack Of September 11th, 2001 All of Which Have Occurred Since That Date
1298Impact of the September 11th Attack on Air Quality and Public Health in Lower Manhattan
1299Supplement To ‘Report Docket No. NIOSH 227JP’ This Report is ‘Report Docket No. NIOSH 227JP2’
1300March 15, 2011 Jeff Prager
1301Cover Photo © FEMA 2001 – Most rescue were not encouraged to wear respirators or breathing apparatus or even simple dust masks because the air was ‘safe’ to breathe based on EPA statements.
1302This report, submitted to NIOSH under Docket Number NIOSH-227, Request for information on Conditions Relating to Cancer to consider for the World Trade Center Health Program and titled, “Report Docket No. NIOSH 227 JP2” uses publicly available data and references a previous report by the same author sent to NIOSH on March 14, 2011 titled, “Report Docket No. NIOSH 227 JP” and sent in PDF format to and received by Diane M. Miller, NIOSH Docket Officer, 513/533-8450at dmm2@cdc.gov.
1303The report was originally sent to: niocindocket@cdc.gov as re-quested.Summary
1304This report in conjunction with the previous report mentioned above provides conclusive evidence that the events of September 11th, 2001 were nuclear in nature,that is, fission occurred in NYC on September 11th. 
1305The relationship to a variety of human cancers and radioactivity are well-known and well documented. 
1306This report summarizes those relationships and seeks to provide the necessary data such that all cancers associated with Ground Zero Rescue Workers included in any medical compensation package adopted by the US federal government, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the Centers For Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), related to the WTC Health Program established by the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act (Pub. L. 111-347) are completely and fully covered. 
1307This is, very simply, the right thing to do.
1308While this and the previous report submitted promote and espouse that radiation exposure was experienced, that conclusion is not necessary to or a part of the assertions in this 2nd report. 
1309This report is based, very simply, on the composition of the Ground Zero dust based on Scanning Electron Microscopy by the United States Geological Survey and posted to the internet as Open Source material and the belief that radiation was a component of the Ground Zero dust is not relative to the overall assertions in this second report.
1310The EPA 9/11 pollution controversy was the result of a report released by the Office of the Inspector General of the United States Environmental Protection Agency in August 2003 which claimed that the White House put pressure on the EPA to delete cautionary information about the air quality in New York City around Ground Zero following the September 11, 2001 attacks. 
1311According to the report: a September 18 EPA statement saying that the air was “safe”
13121 
1313was made without suffcient reliable data available; the White House Council on Environmental Quality influenced the EPA to make reassuring comments to the public; and on September 12
1314the EPA Administrator issued a memo saying that all statements to the media must be cleared by the National Security Council. Numerous key differences between the draft versions and final versions of EPA statements were found. 
1315A recommendation that homes and businesses near ground zero be cleaned by professionals was replaced by a request that citizens follow orders from NYC officials. 
1316Another statement that showed concerns about “sensitive populations”was deleted altogether. 
1317Language used to describe excessive amounts of asbestos in the area was altered drastically to minimize attention to the dangers it posed.
13182
1319The news of the report created a short-lived backlash against the administration. Especially angered were New Yorkers who lived near the site of the attacks. 
1320Even a year after 9/11 some 7,000 rescue workers were believed to be suffering from Ground Zero illness: respiratory ailments caused by the dust, the initial stages of various cancers and other related debilitating illness and to date 1,003 have died. 
1321Many cleaning efforts by government and private agencies on homes and businesses were accused of being inadequate.
13223
1323Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton and Joseph I. Lieberman sent a letter to President George W. Bush concerning his administration’s alleged intervention in internal EPA affairs.
13244
1325In an interview with Katie Couric for 60 Minutes, former EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman criticized NYC authorities for not forcing rescue workers to wear respirators, as EPA did not have the legal authority. 
1326She also defended her own record and denied the claim that her agency lied about air quality surrounding Ground Zero: Whitman stated, “The last thing in the world that I would ever do would be to put people at risk. 
1327Of all the criticisms that I had in my career … this is by far the most personally troubling. 
1328You want to say, ‘You’re wrong.’ We never lied.”
13295
1330However, Whitman’s claims were contradicted by Cate Jenkins, a senior scientist at the EPA. 
1331In a 2006 New York Times article, Jenkins claimed that the EPA outright lied about health hazards posed by alkalinity, or pH level, of the dust levels at Ground Zero.
13326
1333In September 2006 the US House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security held a two day long hearing on the subject of illnesses caused by post-9/11 air quality.
13347
1335Whitman, the EPA, and New York City were targets of blame.
13367
13371. “EPA Response to September 11”
1338http://www.epa.gov/oig/reports/2003/WTC_report_20030821.pdf
13392. Laurie Garrett (2003-08-23). “EPA Misled Public on 9/11 Pollution
1340http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0823-03.htm
13413. Francesca Lyman (Sept. 11, 2003). “Anger builds over EPA’s 9/11 report”
1342http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3076626
1343throughout the precollapse time.
1344                9 11 Depleted uranium, Radiation Exposure, World Trade Center PATH Bathtub, Yellow Trucks
1345Published on Oct 10, 2013
13469 11 Depleted uranium Radiation Exposure, World Trade Center PATH Bathtub, Yellow Trucks
1347Jeff Prager
1348From NY1 published online we have the following:
1349Workers Rush To Repair Huge Hole In WTC ‘Bathtub’
1350“Crews at the World Trade Center site are rushing to fix a 90-foot-wide hole in the retaining wall that keeps out ground water… The collapse of the south tower tore the large gash in the wall on September 11”
1351Based on the evidence presented above it’s my opinion that the integrity of the retaining wall, the Slurry Wall or Bathtub, was never a consideration or even in any jeopardy. Obviously New York City didn’t follow in the footsteps of the fabled Atlantis and become submerged below the oceans forever. The people that claim that a nuclear detonation would have destroyed the Slurry Wall and flooded the city simply do not have a complete and working understanding of exactly how this Slurry Wall works. The articles above, from reputable sources, provide evidence of “fissures in the bedrock” and leakage of 100 to 200 gallons per minute. This is the product and result of a nuclear detonation. At least three of them. The Powers That Be would NEVER explain a nuclear detonation in a populated city. Don’t expect the truth. These people are liars and criminals without concern for civilians.
1352So Fetzer and Wood are in error. The Slurry Wall does not function like a dam and if removed entirely the area would, of course, flood over time because it’s lower than the adjacent river. But the river water wouldn’t flow in as one would expect if a dam were opened, because the wall doesn’t function as an actual dam or as we imagine a dam. There is bedrock, compressed earth, all sorts of cement tunneling (subways), etc. The area is a major metropolitan city, where the slurry wall is. Water won’t flow in like a river although it will seep in through cracks, crevices and natural weak points in the ground, at a pretty good pace.
1353Major portions of the slurry wall were, in fact, reinforced or rebuilt. Water leaked into the Ground Zero building site daily during the construction phase and was continually pumped out.
1354READERS COMMENTS.
1355Geoffrey Franklin says, You never cease to amaze me Daniel J Towsey. I hope there is a special place for you in the Heavens.
1356PLEASE DO SHARE THIS:
1357•	Twitter
1358•	Facebook52
1359•	Print
1360•	Email
1361•	Tumblr
1362•	More
1363•	
13646 THOUGHTS ON “NUCLEAR DEVICES USED AT WTC GROUND ZERO”
13651.	Pingback: Fukushima Daiichi From Nuclear Power Plant to Nuclear Weapon « A Truth Soldier
13662.	Pingback: WTC Constructed to be Nuclear Device Chimneys « 911justicehalifax
13673.	 911False
1368APRIL 12, 2014 AT 12:39 AM
1369Well one thing is sure: Jet Fuel can’t melt Steel. So the planes had nothing to do with the collapse. Sad that most people still believe that story. Its physically impossible, unless the WTC was built of wood (which it was not).
1370REPLY
13714.	 Yan
1372FEBRUARY 8, 2015 AT 8:54 PM
1373I saw this video from you
1374Strangely (or not that so), my special firewall rules that I obtain from the best in the security world for my IPBlock lists (Peerblock for Linux), of course the lists they give with it are bullshit but this list at nexus23.org is the real thing, although costs money, 24 euro for a year…used to be free..but anyway that’s not the point, the point is saying, you are on to something and have really shaken me (and I’m saying the official 911 bullshit is not right since day one, seen it all on CNN, and also as a canadian, I get the US feed of CNN, not their international feed. And when I saw the Pentagon I had to laugh, yeah a 757 in there, SURE. Anyway, when I tried to click your site from youtube, IPBlock blocked me because FBIEdgeCast (EdgeCast is a perfectly fine server renting company, but the FBI does rent a lot of them as to seem innocuous, the people at nexus23.org are not dumb, they have the best internet security thing preventing the spooks and even yes, the NSA to connect to you, leaving them with a “connecting….” and never a response from the computers blocked by IPBlock or Peerblock in windows.
1375You’ve made me rethink my agnosticism. Because of my physical issues, for a while, being heart related, now all is fine, but I’m only 32 and I was plagued with those in my mid to late 20’s. My largest fear was to disappear into nothingness after actually it being my wish since existence is pain in this world.I’m not giving up my agnosticism, but you’ve told me things so different from what the usual misled “christians” tell people. And no, you are making a difference, and yes, youtube since it was bought by google has turned for the worse. But there is people who care, don’t get so depressed. I’m actually, maybe foolishly, being more positive about the future than I was in from 2001 to 2013…too many people are getting to know parts of the truth at least, and that can be enough. A President not born in the US who gives no shit about Israel (Obama) refusing to meet Nuts-n-Yahoo and being outraged that Boehner invited him to speak to congress, a little like how our helmet-headed prime minister went to Israel’s Knesset to suck up the ass of everyone there only to be heckled by the only MP’s in the country with a conscience when he mentioned Israel’s the only democratic country in the area while in the same sentence declaring it a theocracy.
1376You’re not alone man. Thanks for this great explanation Khalezov didn’t mention in his book, even the final 4th edition. Although, I think much of Khalezov is a fraud except for parts of the mechanical ways the wtc 1,2,7 were brought down, his additional books worshipping Talmudic jews, that I never finished after reading that sentence suddenly contradicts what he’s been saying. And those retaliation files in case he goes back to prison…all garbage, doesn’t seem like he’ll have part 3 and 4 released, the parts that will make Russia and the US look horrible and bring about the destruction of Thailand….yeah sure. You shook me to the core when you said everything I didn’t expect about God and positive energy. I try my best to tell people I care for, but that list has shrunk in the last 4 years when my extended teenage years were over…it seems they just don’t care anymore “I’m sick of talking about 911”. Do you also think the 2005 massive tsunami on the 26th of December was something about putting nukes inside a tectonic plate meet-up crack? I don’t see why Japan would be considered a target though. I know people there who have developed zero diseases since the accident so it doesn’t seem all that dramatic. But that’s not the most important things I wanted to tell you. The first one is, the FBI is spying on people trying to read your blog, had to use a secret TOR+VPN way to do it in the clear, and that your speech has shaken me, finally a christian who speaks in terms I can understand “Jesus died for your sins!” always had me say “what? what did I do then? I wasn’t even around.” You’ve made it clear now that’s not what we’re supposed to understand. I’m a chemistry technician and I don’t know if you ever watched the only show worth watching on TV (it’s over now) from 2008 to 2013….but they add up elements that compose the human body by moles (missing a few trace elements but its TV) and yes, we can’t account for all the weight of a human body with pure science….what this “soul” thing might be is thje good energy and people like Dick Cheney must have destroyed so much of it with their own brain that not many if any of it remains, the man’s machines for a heart prevents him from even having a pulse….that’s so creepy, but I got a feeling many of the people involved in 911 will get theirs, Israel won’t get to pull their Samson Option, too many people are starting to know the truth guy. Don’t give up. Even Senator Bob Graham admitted 911 was a 30 year conspiracy on camera to some truthers…there’s an internal fight between these scumbags and lesser scumbags.
1377Namaste
1378REPLY
13791.	 Daniel J Towsey A Truth Soldier
1380FEBRUARY 9, 2015 AT 12:02 AM
1381Well said… And about Fukushima..you are right, yes they nuked the oceans shelf to raise it which created the up to 150 high waves… the info is in the Fukuskushima pages at http;//ATruthSoldier.com
1382Thanks for your support..and you are a now a clairvoyant..you see see reality and that is based on pure truth…
1383Take care my fellow cosmic traveler…
1384REPLY
13855.	Pingback: Nuclear Radioactive Wave Dustification of WTC Steel Structure | 911justicehalifax
1386LEAVE A REPLY
1387https://911justicehalifax.wordpress.com/nuclear-devices-used-at-wtc/
1388
1389
13909/11 Attacks: Criminal Foreknowledge and Insider Trading lead directly to the CIA’s Highest Ranks
1391CIA Executive Director "Buzzy" Krongard managed Firm that handled "Put" Options on UAL
1392 
1393We pay tribute to Michael C. Ruppert, author and former LAPD detective, who passed away on April 13.
1394The following text by Michael C. Ruppert published on GR in October 2001 brings to the forefront the issue of foreknowledge and insider trading pertaining to airline listings on the Chicago Board Options Exchange including United Airlines and American Airlines.
1395Suppressed Details of 9/11 Criminal Insider Trading lead directly into the CIA`s Highest Ranks
1396CIA Executive Director “Buzzy” Krongard managed Firm that handled “put” Options on UAL
1397by Michael C. Ruppert
1398FTW Publications, 9 October 2001, Centre for Research on Globalisation, globalresearch.ca, 20 October 2001
1399Although uniformly ignored by the mainstream U.S. media, there is abundant and clear evidence that a number of transactions in financial markets indicated specific (criminal) foreknowledge of the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. That evidence also demonstrates that, in the case of at least one of these trades — which has left a $2.5 million prize unclaimed — the firm used to place the “put options” on United Airlines stock was, until 1998, managed by the man who is now in the number three Executive Director position at the Central Intelligence Agency. Until 1997 A.B. “Buzzy” Krongard had been Chairman of the investment bank A.B. Brown. A.B. Brown was acquired by Banker’s Trust in 1997. Krongard then became, as part of the merger, Vice Chairman of Banker’s Trust-AB Brown, one of 20 major U.S. banks named by Senator Carl Levin this year as being connected to money laundering. Krongard’s last position at Banker’s Trust (BT) was to oversee “private client relations.” In this capacity he had direct hands-on relations with some of the wealthiest people in the world in a kind of specialized banking operation that has been identified by the U.S. Senate and other investigators as being closely connected to the laundering of drug money.
1400Krongard (re?) joined the CIA in 1998 as counsel to CIA Director George Tenet. He was promoted to CIA Executive Director by President Bush in March of this year. BT was acquired by Deutsche Bank in 1999. The combined firm is the single largest bank in Europe. And, as we shall see, Deutsche Bank played several key roles in events connected to the September 11 attacks.
1401The Scope of Known Insider Trading
1402Before looking further into these relationships it is necessary to look at the insider trading information that is being ignored by Reuters, The New York Times and other mass media. It is well documented that the CIA has long monitored such trades – in real time – as potential warnings of terrorist attacks and other economic moves contrary to U.S. interests. Previous stories in FTW have specifically highlighted the use of Promis software to monitor such trades.
1403It is necessary to understand only two key financial terms to understand the significance of these trades. “Selling Short” is the borrowing of stock, selling it at current market prices, but not being required to actually produce the stock for some time. If the stock falls precipitously after the short contract is entered, the seller can then fulfill the contract by buying the stock after the price has fallen and complete the contract at the pre-crash price. These contracts often have a window of as long as four months. “Put Options,” purchased at nominal prices of, for example, $1.00 per share, are sold in blocks of 100 shares. If exercised, they give the holder the option of selling selected stocks at a future date at a price set when the contract is issued. Thus, for an investment of $10,000 it might be possible to tie up 10,000 shares of United or American Airlines at $100 per share, and the seller of the option is then obligated to buy them if the option is executed. If the stock has fallen to $50 when the contract matures, the holder of the option can purchase the shares for $50 and immediately sell them for $100 – regardless of where the market then stands.
1404A “call option” is the reverse of a put option, which is, in effect, a derivatives bet that the stock price will go up.
1405A September 21 story by the Israeli Herzliyya International Policy Institute for Counterterrorism, entitled “Black Tuesday: The World’s Largest Insider Trading Scam?” documented the following trades connected to the September 11 attacks:
1406	Between September 6 and 7, the Chicago Board Options Exchange saw purchases of 4,744 put options on United Airlines, but only 396 call options… Assuming that 4,000 of the options were bought by people with advance knowledge of the imminent attacks, these “insiders” would have profited by almost $5 million.
1407	On September 10, 4,516 put options on American Airlines were bought on the Chicago exchange, compared to only 748 calls. Again, there was no news at that point to justify this imbalance;… Again, assuming that 4,000 of these options trades represent “insiders,” they would represent a gain of about $4 million.
1408	[The levels of put options purchased above were more than six times higher than normal.]
1409	No similar trading in other airlines occurred on the Chicago exchange in the days immediately preceding Black Tuesday.
1410	Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., which occupied 22 floors of the World Trade Center, saw 2,157 of its October $45 put options bought in the three trading days before Black Tuesday; this compares to an average of 27 contracts per day before September 6. Morgan Stanley’s share price fell from $48.90 to $42.50 in the aftermath of the attacks. Assuming that 2,000 of these options contracts were bought based upon knowledge of the approaching attacks, their purchasers could have profited by at least $1.2 million.
1411	Merrill Lynch & Co., which occupied 22 floors of the World Trade Center, saw 12,215 October $45 put options bought in the four trading days before the attacks; the previous average volume in those shares had been 252 contracts per day [a 1200% increase!]. When trading resumed, Merrill’s shares fell from $46.88 to $41.50; assuming that 11,000 option contracts were bought by “insiders,” their profit would have been about $5.5 million.
1412	European regulators are examining trades in Germany’s Munich Re, Switzerland’s Swiss Re, and AXA of France, all major reinsurers with exposure to the Black Tuesday disaster. [FTW Note: AXA also owns more than 25% of American Airlines stock making the attacks a "double whammy" for them.]
1413On September 29, 2001 – in a vital story that has gone unnoticed by the major media – the San Francisco Chronicle reported, “Investors have yet to collect more than $2.5 million in profits they made trading options in the stock of United Airlines before the Sept. 11, terrorist attacks, according to a source familiar with the trades and market data.
1414“The uncollected money raises suspicions that the investors – whose identities and nationalities have not been made public – had advance knowledge of the strikes.” They don’t dare show up now. The suspension of trading for four days after the attacks made it impossible to cash-out quickly and claim the prize before investigators started looking.
1415“… October series options for UAL Corp. were purchased in highly unusual volumes three trading days before the terrorist attacks for a total outlay of $2,070; investors bought the option contracts, each representing 100 shares, for 90 cents each. [This represents 230,000 shares]. Those options are now selling at more than $12 each. There are still 2,313 so-called “put” options outstanding [valued at $2.77 million and representing 231,300 shares] according to the Options Clearinghouse Corp.”
1416“…The source familiar with the United trades identified Deutsche Bank Alex. Brown, the American investment banking arm of German giant Deutsche Bank, as the investment bank used to purchase at least some of these options…”
1417As reported in other news stories, Deutsche Bank was also the hub of insider trading activity connected to Munich Re. just before the attacks.
1418CIA, the Banks and the Brokers
1419Understanding the interrelationships between CIA and the banking and brokerage world is critical to grasping the already frightening implications of the above revelations. Let’s look at the history of CIA, Wall Street and the big banks by looking at some of the key players in CIA’s history. Clark Clifford – The National Security Act of 1947 was written by Clark Clifford, a Democratic Party powerhouse, former Secretary of Defense, and one-time advisor to President Harry Truman. In the 1980s, as Chairman of First American Bancshares, Clifford was instrumental in getting the corrupt CIA drug bank BCCI a license to operate on American shores. His profession: Wall Street lawyer and banker.
1420John Foster and Allen Dulles – These two brothers “designed” the CIA for Clifford. Both were active in intelligence operations during WW II. Allen Dulles was the U.S. Ambassador to Switzerland where he met frequently with Nazi leaders and looked after U.S. investments in Germany. John Foster went on to become Secretary of State under Dwight Eisenhower and Allen went on to serve as CIA Director under Eisenhower and was later fired by JFK. Their professions: partners in the most powerful – to this day – Wall Street law firm of Sullivan, Cromwell.
1421Bill Casey – Ronald Reagan’s CIA Director and OSS veteran who served as chief wrangler during the Iran-Contra years was, under President Richard Nixon, Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission. His profession: Wall Street lawyer and stockbroker.
1422David Doherty – The current Vice President of the New York Stock Exchange for enforcement is the retired General Counsel of the Central Intelligence Agency.
1423George Herbert Walker Bush – President from 1989 to January 1993, also served as CIA Director for 13 months from 1976-7. He is now a paid consultant to the Carlyle Group, the 11th largest defense contractor in the nation, and which shares joint investments with the bin Laden family.
1424A.B. “Buzzy” Krongard – The current Executive Director of the Central Intelligence Agency is the former Chairman of the investment bank A.B. Brown and former Vice Chairman of Banker’s Trust.
1425John Deutch – This retired CIA Director from the Clinton Administration currently sits on the board at Citigroup, the nation’s second largest bank, which has been repeatedly and overtly involved in the documented laundering drug money. This includes Citigroup’s 2001 purchase of a Mexican bank known to launder drug money, Banamex.
1426Nora Slatkin – This retired CIA Executive Director also sits on Citibank’s board.
1427Maurice “Hank” Greenburg – The CEO of AIG insurance, manager of the third largest capital investment pool in the world, was floated as a possible CIA Director in 1995. FTW exposed Greenberg’s and AIG’s long connection to CIA drug trafficking and covert operations in a two-part series that was interrupted just prior to the attacks of September 11. AIG’s stock has bounced back remarkably well since the attacks. To read that story, please go to http://www.copvcia.com/stories/part_2.html.
1428One wonders how much damning evidence is necessary to respond to what is now irrefutable proof that CIA knew about the attacks and did not stop them. Whatever our government is doing, whatever the CIA is doing, it is clearly NOT in the interests of the American people, especially those who died on September 11.
1429The original URL of this article is:
1430http://globalresearch.ca/articles/RUP110A.html
1431Copyright, 2001, Michael C. Ruppert and FTW Publications at http://www.copvcia.com.
1432Now you have the opportunity to watch the important testimonies from this conference. Order your DVD of “The Toronto Hearings on 9/11: Uncovering Ten Years of Deception” from Global Research and find out the latest research on the event that launched 11 years of war and aggression.
1433Press For Truth and The International Center for 9/11 Studies Present:
1434The Toronto Hearings on 9/11: Uncovering Ten Years of Deception
1435DVD AVAILABLE TO ORDER FROM GLOBAL RESEARCH!
1436Price: $22.95
1437(+ S&H)
1438CLICK HERE TO ORDER YOUR COPY!
1439
1440 
1441Click here to view the TRAILER on GlobalResearchTV
1442 
1443Produced by:
1444Steven Davies
1445Dan Dicks
1446Bryan Law
1447An over 5 hour DVD, with comprehensive coverage of the 4 day Toronto Hearings from September 2011.
1448Featuring expert witness testimony from:
1449 
1450David Ray Griffin
1451Richard Gage
1452David Chandler
1453Michel Chossudovsky
1454Kevin Ryan
1455Niels Harrit
1456Barbara Honegger
1457Peter Dale Scott
1458Graeme MacQueen
1459Jonathan Cole
1460Cynthia McKinney
1461…and many more!
1462The Toronto Hearings on 9/11: Uncovering Ten Years of Deception
1463Produced By:
1464Press for Truth
1465Runtime:
1466Over 5 hours!
1467Release Date:
1468April 2012
1469 
1470Price: $22.95
1471(+ S&H)
1472ORDER YOUR COPY TODAY!
1473The original source of this article is Global Research
1474Copyright © Michael C. Ruppert, Global Research, 2014
1475http://www.globalresearch.ca/9-11-attacks-criminal-foreknowledge-and-insider-trading-lead-directly-to-the-cia-s-highest-ranks/32323
1476
1477Complete 911 Timeline
1478Insider Trading and Other Foreknowledge
1479Project: Complete 911 Timeline
1480Open-Content project managed by matt, Paul, KJF, mtuck, paxvector
1481add event | references
14821995: Bin Laden Investigated for Using European Stock Markets
1483   
1484Shortly after 9/11, an Italian newspaper will report, “Six or seven years ago, probably in 1995, secret services from various European countries investigated the possibility that al-Qaeda, Osama bin Laden’s organization, was using a Milan stockbroker firm to operate on Europe’s money markets.” Italian intelligence first brings up the possibility, which is then investigated by other European intelligence agencies as well. However, it is also reported, “We neither know the name of the Milan stockbroker, nor whether the initial suspicions have ever been confirmed.” [BBC, 9/17/2001] It will also be reported shortly after 9/11 that “Italian stock authorities [are] investigating abnormal movements in share prices on the Milan stock exchange prior to the terrorist attacks” (seeSeptember 17, 2001). [LOS ANGELES TIMES, 9/18/2001]
1485Entity Tags: Osama bin Laden
1486Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge, Terrorism Financing, Al Taqwa Bank
1487(Late 1999): New York Terrorism Task Force Predicts 9/11-Style Attack on the World Trade Center
1488   
1489 Nelson DeMille.[Source: Sandy DeMille]Members of the New York Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF) tell a best-selling author that they believe the next terrorist attack in the United States will involve suicide pilots deliberately flying planes into the World Trade Center. [DEMILLE, 2010, PP. XII; CONNECTICUT POST, 8/3/2010] The New York JTTF has exclusive jurisdiction over local terrorism investigations. [CITY JOURNAL, 10/2001] It has over 140 members, including personnel from the FBI, the New York City Police Department, the Port Authority Police Department, the Secret Service, and the CIA. The task force is “on the forefront of the war against terrorism,” according to the FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. [FBI LAW ENFORCEMENT BULLETIN, 3/1/1999;WASHINGTON POST, 10/23/2002] Thriller writer Nelson DeMille interviews some of its members while carrying out research for his novel The Lion’s Game, which he writes in 1999 and is published in January 2000. [DEMILLE, 2010, PP. XI-XII; AL-MASRY AL-YOUM, 4/27/2010] 
1490Author Told that 'Suicide Pilots' Will Fly Learjets into the WTC - DeMille will later recall that while he is at 26 Federal Plaza, where the New York JTTF is located, “Just in passing we were talking about the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center” (see February 26, 1993). DeMille wonders if there will be another terrorist attack in the United States. He asks the JTTF personnel: “What do you think the next attack would be? Will there be another attack?” They reply: “Yeah. It’s gonna be the World Trade Center again. They missed it.” [SIRIUS XM BOOK RADIO, 6/16/2010] (Presumably, when the JTTF personnel say, “They missed it,” they mean that the terrorists failed to cause the WTC to collapse when they bombed it in 1993.) DeMille then asks, “What’s gonna happen?” The JTTF personnel say the next attack will involve “two or three or four Learjets, private jets full of aviation fuel and explosives, flying into the towers.” [WOR, 6/14/2010] The planes, they say, will be “flown into the North and South Towers of the Trade Center” by “suicide pilots.” [DEMILLE, 2010, PP. XII; CONNECTICUT POST, 8/3/2010] The suicide pilots will be “guys who know how to fly and not [how] to land” a plane. [NEW YORK DAILY NEWS, 9/11/2011] 
1491Terrorists Will Want to Cause 'Maximum Death' - DeMille asks the JTTF personnel why they think the terrorists will specifically target the WTC again. He says: “Why not any other iconic landmark? Why not the Empire State Building?” They tell him it is because the terrorists will be “looking for maximum death.” [WOR, 6/14/2010] This discussion, according to DeMille, takes place “almost two yearsbefore the actual events of September 11, 2001.” [DEMILLE, 2010, PP. XII] 
1492JTTF Knows about Arabs Learning to Fly in the US - DeMille will tell the New York Times that the members of the New York JTTF “were all obsessed with the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center, and they were convinced we’d be attacked again.” [NEW YORK TIMES, 11/9/2006] He will say that JTTF personnel “knew” the target of the next terrorist attack in the US would be the WTC. “They were pretty, pretty definite about that,” he will add. [WOR, 6/14/2010]They also “knew that Arabs were training in the United States to fly small planes,” according to DeMille. [NEWSWEEK, 1/23/2002] 
1493JTTF Has 'Foreknowledge' or 'Forethought' of 9/11 - DeMille will write that because of what he is told by the JTTF personnel: “[W]hen the events of the morning of September 11, 2001, unfolded, I was not taken completely unaware. And neither were the people who had spent years investigating terrorist threats to this country.” [DEMILLE, 2010, PP. XII] He will note that the JTTF personnel he talks to are “close to right” about the nature of the next attack in the US. He will say, “They knew the target and they knew the method” the terrorists would use. [SIRIUS XM BOOK RADIO, 6/16/2010] DeMille will also say that when he sees the attacks on the WTC on September 11, he finds it “just chilling to think that [members of the JTTF] had some, if not foreknowledge, at least some forethought of this.” [77WABC, 5/22/2010] Radio host Glenn Beck will comment that what the JTTF personnel tell DeMille shows that the US government “knew specifically” what the 9/11 attacks would involve. [PREMIERE RADIO NETWORKS, 6/9/2010]
1494Entity Tags: Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Nelson DeMille, New York City Police Department, Glenn Beck, Port Authority Police Department, US Secret Service, New York Joint Terrorism Task Force
1495Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1496Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1497Spring and Summer 2001: Self-Proclaimed Intelligence Agent Warns of Terrorist Attacks in New York
1498   
1499 Susan P. Lindauer. [Source: Justin Lane / European Press Photo Agency]Susan Lindauer, an American woman with possible, if mysterious, ties to US intelligence, warns her brother John and a friend of hers named Parke Godfrey to stay away from New York because terrorist attacks are likely to take place soon. John Lindauer, a music producer in Los Angeles, and Godfrey, a professor of computer science at a Canadian university, will later confirm having received the warnings. The source of Susan Lindauer’s fear is unclear. [NEW YORK TIMES MAGAZINE, 8/29/2004] Lindauer is a journalist and press aide with a somewhat erratic career, according to later press accounts. After brief stints at various newspapers and magazines, she has been working on and off in Washington as a public relations aide for members of Congress. In the early 1990s, she joined an informal discussion group of Congressional aides and intelligence professionals who liked to discuss international politics at a Chinese restaurant on Capitol Hill. A member of the group named Paul A. Hoven, a retired military man who served as a helicopter pilot in Vietnam, soon introduced her to Dr. Richard C. Fuisz. Fuisz, an unusual, globe-trotting physician-businessman, recruited her, according to Lindauer, to serve as an unofficial back-channel go-between with Libya and Iraq. Dr. Fuize, a psychiatrist by training, was identified by a British newspaper as a top CIA officer in Syria during the 1980s. Fuize, Lindauer will claim, was her CIA handler. Lindauer, who proclaims herself a peace activist, will later say that her only interest in her intelligence work was to facilitate peaceful diplomacy between the United States and Iraq and Libya. After the 9/11 attacks, she will maintain her Iraqi contacts and even travel to Baghdad. In 2003, shortly before the the US invasion of Iraq, Lindauer will write to Andrew Card, the White House chief of staff, who happens to be a distant relative of hers, to inform him of diplomatic overtures that Iraqi diplomats in New York have asked her to convey. Card will turn over the letter to the FBI, which will lead to Lindauer’s arrest in March, 2004, for being an unregistered agent for Iraq. [NEW YORK TIMES, 3/12/2004; NEW YORK TIMES, 3/12/2004; WASHINGTON POST, 3/12/2004; NEW YORK TIMES MAGAZINE, 8/29/2004] But after several years of a convoluted legal process, prosecutors will withdraw all charges against her in January 2009, after court-appointed experts repeatedly find her to be suffering from paranoia and delusions of grandeur, and therefore unfit for trial. [NEW YORK TIMES, 6/18/2008;NEW YORK TIMES, 9/16/2008; KTUU-2 (ANCHORAGE), 1/17/2009]
1500Entity Tags: Susan Lindauer
1501Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1502Summer 2001: Bin Laden Speech Mentions 20 Martyrs in Upcoming Attack; Other Hints of Attack Spread Widely
1503   
1504Word begins to spread within al-Qaeda that an attack against the US is imminent, according to later prison interrogations of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed. Many within al-Qaeda are aware that Mohammed has been preparing operatives to go to the US. Additionally, bin Laden makes several remarks hinting at an upcoming attack, spawning rumors throughout Muslim extremist circles worldwide. 
1505  In a recorded speech at the Al Farooq training camp in Afghanistan, Osama bin Laden specifically urges trainees to pray for the success of an upcoming attack involving 20 martyrs. [9/11 COMMISSION, 6/16/2004] 
1506  Members of the “Lackawanna Six” see bin Laden give a recorded speech at the Al Farooq camp in which he urges trainees to pray for 40 en route on a very important mission. It is not known if this is the same as the other Al Farooq speech or a separate one (see (June 2001)). 
1507  A bin Laden bodyguard later will claim that in May 2001 or earlier in the year he heard bin Laden tell people in Afghanistan that the US would be hit with an attack, and thousands would die (see Early 2001). [GUARDIAN, 11/28/2002] 
1508  In mid-June 2001, bin Laden tells training camp trainees there will be an attack in the near future. US intelligence soon learns of this (see Mid-June 2001). 
1509  In June 2001, the CIA hears that Arabs in Afghanistan are said to be anticipating as many as eight celebrations, and al-Qaeda operatives are being told to await important news within days (see June 2001). 
1510  John Walker Lindh learns details of the 9/11 attack despite being a Caucasian and US citizen who only recently converted to Islam (see May-June 2001). 
1511There are other indications that knowledge of the attacks spreads in Afghanistan. The Daily Telegraph later reports that “the idea of an attack on a skyscraper [is] discussed among [bin Laden’s] supporters in Kabul.” At some unspecified point before 9/11, a neighbor in Kabul sees diagrams showing a skyscraper attack in a house known as a “nerve center” for al-Qaeda activity.[DAILY TELEGRAPH, 11/16/2001] US soldiers will later find forged visas, altered passports, listings of Florida flight schools and registration papers for a flight simulator in al-Qaeda houses in Afghanistan. [NEW YORK TIMES, 12/6/2001]
1512Entity Tags: Al Farooq training camp, Al-Qaeda, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, Osama bin Laden
1513Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1514Category Tags: Key Warnings, Warning Signs, Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge, Foreign Intelligence Warnings
1515June-August 2001: Major Increase in US Currency in Circulation Possibly Indicates Foreknowledge of 9/11 Attacks
1516   
1517 William Bergman.[Source: Publicity photo]An unexplained significant increase in the amount of US currency in circulation causes one economist to later consider whether some individuals might have had foreknowledge of the impending September 11 attacks. Between June and August 2001, the currency component of the “M1 aggregate”—which includes currency in circulation and demand deposits—reported by the US Federal Reserve, increases by the greatest amount over the June-August period since 1947, the first year for which this data is reported. [SANDERS RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, 9/16/2005;DEVINE AND MILES, 1/20/2006  ] Economist William Bergman, who works at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago from 1990 to 2004, will later point out: “The August increase alone was the third largest single monthly increase since 1947, trailing only December 1999 (with pre-Y2K concern as well as terrorism threats) and January 1991 (the onset of US military action in Iraq, and an important enforcement month in the BCCI money laundering scandal).… The above-average growth in currency in July and August 2001 totaled over $5 billion.” Bergman will suggest the spike in currency growth might indicate some people possessing foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks: “[A]nyone mindful that their financial assets might be seized or otherwise at risk after the attacks converted their bank accounts to a more liquid asset before the attacks.” He will explain: “Under money laundering and other laws, including those applied in a time of war or a declared national emergency, assets in the banking system can be frozen and seized. The implied incentives help explain a related phenomenon called ‘wartime hoarding.’ Historically, in wartime, currency in circulation outside of banks has tended to rise relative to other forms of money like bank deposits.… Was ‘wartime hoarding’ at work right before 9/11? The conversion of bank accounts into currency could have been responsible for the surge in currency in July and August 2001.” A less sinister alternative explanation for the currency surge might possibly be the currently deteriorating banking conditions in Argentina. [SANDERS RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, 1/4/2006] There is also a high level of fear within the US government and intelligence community around this time, about the threat in general of an imminent terrorist attack (see Summer 2001, June-July 2001, June 28, 2001, and June 28, 2001). As the Government Accountability Project will in 2006 write: “The [Federal Reserve’s] failure to date to publicly address the growth in currency in mid-2001 is conspicuous. If a benign explanation exists, or if for whatever reasons the currency growth is irrelevant, the Fed should say so publicly, and explain why this is the case. A failure to do so raises… troubling questions.” [DEVINE AND MILES, 1/20/2006  ] Also around this time, on August 2, 2001, the Federal Reserve Board of Governors issues—without explanation—a letter to Federal Reserve banks, which emphasizes the importance of monitoring suspicious activity reports (see August 2, 2001). [SPILLENKOTHEN, 8/2/2001]
1518Entity Tags: US Federal Reserve, William Bergman
1519Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1520Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1521July 16, 2001: New York Taxi Driver Tells of E-mails Warning Imminent Al-Qaeda Attack on New York and Washington
1522   
1523A Village Voice reporter is told by a New York taxi driver, “You know, I am leaving the country and going home to Egypt sometime in late August or September. I have gotten e-mails from people I know saying that Osama bin Laden has planned big terrorist attacks for New York and Washington for that time. It will not be safe here then.” He does in fact return to Egypt for that time. The FBI, which is not told about this lead until after 9/11, interrogates and then releases him. He claims that many others knew what he knew prior to 9/11. [VILLAGE VOICE, 9/25/2002]
1524Entity Tags: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Osama bin Laden
1525Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1526Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1527August 2, 2001: Federal Reserve Governors Encourage Banks to Review Suspicious Activity Reports, Possibly Due to Heightened Terrorist Threat
1528   
1529The Federal Reserve Board of Governors issues a non-routine supervisory letter to Federal Reserve banks, emphasizing the need to continue monitoring suspicious activity reports (SARs). The letter gives no explanation why it has been sent out at this particular time, but states, “Reserve banks must continue to conduct a thorough and timely review of all material SARs filed by supervised financial institutions in their districts.” It adds, “A periodic, comprehensive review of SARs will assist Reserve banks in identifying suspicious or suspected criminal activity occurring at or through supervised financial institutions; provide the information necessary to assess the procedures and controls used by the reporting institutions to identify, monitor, and report violations and suspicious illicit activities; and assist in the assessment of the adequacy of anti-money laundering programs.” [SPILLENKOTHEN, 8/2/2001] While the letter does not say if there are specific reasons why the banks should currently be watching for suspicious activities, William Bergman, an economist who works at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago from 1990 to 2004, will later point out, “Intelligence warnings on terrorism were rising significantly in mid-2001.” He will therefore question whether, “with terrorism and its financing already recognized as an important element of the national money laundering strategy,” this letter is “related to these warnings.” He will also point out, “negotiations between the Taliban and representatives of the United States over energy production issues in Afghanistan ended on August 2, 2001” (see August 2, 2001), and that, “Four days later, President Bush received a ‘PDB’—a presidential daily brief—with a headline warning that bin Laden was ‘determined to strike in US,’ and the body text of the PDB referred to ‘patterns of suspicious activity’” (see August 6, 2001). [SANDERS RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, 1/4/2006] When, in December 2003, Bergman asks the Board of Governors staff why it issued the August 2 letter, and if the letter was related to intelligence about heightened terrorist threats, he will receive no reply and subsequently be told he has “committed an egregious breach of protocol in calling the Board staff and asking the question.” [VETERAN AFFAIRS WHISTLEBLOWERS COALITION, 5/14/2006] Also around this time, between June and August 2001, there is an unexplained surge in the amount of US currency in circulation (see June-August 2001). [SANDERS RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, 9/16/2005]
1530Entity Tags: William Bergman, Federal Reserve Board of Governors
1531Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1532Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1533August 6, 2001: Suspicious Trading of Companies Affected by 9/11 May Begin by This Date
1534   
1535Insider trading based on advanced knowledge of the 9/11 attacks may have begun on this date, if not earlier. Investigators later discover a large number of put option purchases (a speculation that the stock will go down) that expire on September 30 at the Chicago Board Options Exchange are bought on this date. If exercised, these options would have led to large profits. One analyst later says, “From what I’m hearing, it’s more than coincidence.” [REUTERS, 9/20/2001]
1536Entity Tags: Chicago Board Options Exchange
1537Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1538Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1539(August 25, 2001): 9/11 Hijacker Alhazmi Possibly Calls Associate in San Diego and Tells Him of 9/11 Attacks Date
1540   
1541Around August 25, 2001, future 9/11 hijacker Nawaf Alhazmi possibly calls Mohdar Abdullah, a close associate of his when he lived in San Diego in 2000, and tells him about the 9/11 attacks date. 
1542  Shortly after 9/11, the FBI will question Abdullah about getting a call from Alhazmi in August; it is unclear how the FBI would have known to ask that question. 
1543  In a July 2002 interview with the FBI, Abdullah will ask if the FBI taped the phone call, suggesting that it does take place. 
1544  In 2003, Abdullah will be in a US jail, and another prisoner will claim Abdullah says he found out about the 9/11 attacks three weeks in advance. 
1545  Abdullah stops making calls from his phone after August 25, 2001. 
1546  After 9/11, Abdullah’s friends will say that Abdullah starts acting strangely around this time. [9/11 COMMISSION, 7/24/2004, PP. 218, 531] 
1547  According to a witness, one day before 9/11, Abdullah and some of his co-workers (who are themselves radical Islamists (see Autumn 2000)) will appear to celebrate the upcoming 9/11 attacks, and one of them says, “It is finally going to happen” (see Late August-September 10, 2001). 
1548In 2003 and 2004, more evidence will emerge that Abdullah willingly took part in the 9/11 plot, but he will be deported anyway (see September 2003-May 21, 2004 and May 21, 2004).
1549Entity Tags: Nawaf Alhazmi, Mohdar Abdullah
1550Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1551Category Tags: Alhazmi and Almihdhar, Possible Hijacker Associates in US, Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1552Late August-September 10, 2001: 9/11 Hijackers’ San Diego Associates Appear to Have Foreknowledge of Attacks
1553   
1554 Osama Awadallah.[Source: Chris Park / Associated Press]Associates of 9/11 hijackers Nawaf Alhazmi and Khalid Almihdhar in San Diego reportedly change their behavior and seem to be aware that “something big” is about to happen. But it is not clear how they would have obtained this information. 
1555  The 9/11 Commission will suggest that there is evidence Alhazmi calls Mohdar Abdullah in late August (see (August 25, 2001)). Abdullah, a friend of these two hijackers in San Diego, may have been told some about the 9/11 plot back in 2000 and even invited to join in (see Early 2000and June 10, 2000). 
1556  He will later brag to someone in prison that he was told of the attack date three weeks in advance (see Early 2000). 
1557  Both Abdullah and another former associate of the hijackers, Yazeed al-Salmi, suddenly become intent on marrying before 9/11. The 9/11 Commission will quote a witness saying al-Salmi told him, “I knew they were going to do something, that is why I got married.” 
1558  In addition, employees at the Texaco station where Alhazmi worked (seeAutumn 2000), including one named Iyad Kreiwesh, apparently expect that law enforcement authorities will visit them in the near future. 
1559  Further, according to one witness, early on the morning of September 10, Abdullah, Osama Awadallah, Omar Bakarbashat, and others behave suspiciously at the gas station. The witness will say that after the group meets, Awadallah tells the others, “[I]t is finally going to happen” and they celebrate with high fives. [9/11 COMMISSION, 7/24/2004, PP. 219-220, 249-50, 532]
1560Entity Tags: Iyad Kreiwesh, Yazeed al-Salmi, Osama Awadallah, Nawaf Alhazmi, Omar Bakarbashat, Mohdar Abdullah
1561Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1562Category Tags: Alhazmi and Almihdhar, Possible Hijacker Associates in US, Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1563August 29, 2001: 9/11 Hijacker Atta Tells Bin Al-Shibh Exact Date of 9/11 Attacks
1564   
1565In a later interview, would-be hijacker Ramzi bin al-Shibh claims that on this day 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta calls him (he is in Germany at the time) from the US (see April, June, or August 2002). Atta asks him what is “two sticks, a dash and a cake with a stick down?” The answer, which bin al-Shibh figures out, is “11-9” —the European and Arabic way of writing 9/11. [KNIGHT RIDDER, 9/9/2002; CBS NEWS, 10/9/2002] Now knowing the date of the attack, bin al-Shibh later claims that he orders active cells in Europe, the US, and elsewhere to evacuate.
1566Entity Tags: Mohamed Atta, Ramzi bin al-Shibh
1567Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1568Category Tags: Mohamed Atta, Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge, Ramzi Bin Al-Shibh
1569Late August 2001: Mystery Arab Rap Group Records CD about Terrorism
1570   
1571A mysterious Arab rap band records a CD, which includes songs apparently about upcoming terrorist attacks. The group, called the Arab Assassins, records its songs at the GHC Recording Studio in Sarasota, Florida. According to the Sarasota Herald-Tribune, their lyrics “range from generic references to Palestinian beliefs to verses that could be considered by some as a warning of what unfolded in New York City and Washington, DC” on 9/11. These refer to subjects such as bombings, New York, and fundamentalist Islamic martyrs. Lyrics include, “I know I’m going to die,” “I’m next on God’s list,” “Partners torn, transformed to martyrs,” “to turn wives into widows,” and “the US will remember this.” After 9/11, the recording studio’s owner Chris Musgrave will comment, “There are some weird coincidences here.” The rap group is made up of three brothers who claim to be from Brooklyn. Yet officials with the Recording Industry Association of America later say they have never heard of the Arab Assassins, and none of the large Internet music sites offer any recordings by them. After recording several songs at the studio, the Arab Assassins take six copies of their CD, and then leave a telephone number that is listed as disconnected. The day after 9/11, the local FBI will seize a copy of the CD from the studio, but offer no comments to the press on the band. [ASSOCIATED PRESS, 9/13/2001; SARASOTA HERALD-TRIBUNE, 9/13/2001] Some Middle Eastern men will be witnessed in Sarasota early in the morning of 9/11 acting suspiciously, though details of their identities are unknown (see (Before 6:00 a.m.) September 11, 2001) (see (8:50 a.m.) September 11, 2001). [LONGBOAT OBSERVER, 9/26/2001]
1572Entity Tags: Arab Assassins
1573Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1574Category Tags: Other Pre-9/11 Events, Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1575Early September 2001: Rumors in New York City’s Arab-American Community About Attacks
1576   
1577A veteran detective involved with post-9/11 investigations later claims that rumors in New York City’s Arab-American community about the 9/11 attacks are common in the days beforehand. The story “had been out on the street” and the number of leads turning up later is so “overwhelming” that it is difficult to tell who knows about the attacks from secondhand sources and who knows about it from someone who may have been a participant. After 9/11, tracking leads regarding Middle Eastern employees who did not show up for work on 9/11 are “a serious and major priority.” [JOURNAL NEWS (WHITE PLAINS), 10/11/2001]
1578Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1579Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1580Early September 2001: New York Mosque Warning: Stay Out of Lower Manhattan on 9/11
1581   
1582Shortly before 9/11, people attending an unnamed mosque in the Bronx district of New York City are warned to stay out of lower Manhattan on 9/11. The FBI’s Joint Terrorist Task Force interviews dozens of members of the mosque, who confirm the story. The mosque leadership denies any advanced knowledge and the case apparently remains unsolved. [NEW YORK DAILY NEWS, 10/12/2001]
1583Entity Tags: Federal Bureau of Investigation
1584Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1585Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1586Early September 2001: Suspicious Trading in Reinsurance Companies
1587   
1588It will later be speculated that, around this time, people with foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks short sell reinsurance company stocks that are insuring either or both the airplanes and the buildings involved in the attacks. Munich Re, the largest European reinsurance company, loses 22 percent of its value in the two month before 9/11, with about half of that taking place in the week before the attacks. German authorities will later alert the Securities and Exchange Commission of “suspect movements” with Munich Re. [AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE, 9/17/2001] Suspicious inquiries into the short selling of millions of company shares are made in France days before the attacks. [REUTERS, 9/20/2001; SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, 9/22/2001] Munich Re stock will plummet after the attacks, as they claim the attacks will cost them $2 billion. [DOW JONES BUSINESS NEWS, 9/20/2001] There is also suspicious trading activity involving reinsurers Swiss Reinsurance and AXA. These trades are especially curious because the insurance sector “is one of the brightest spots in a very difficult market” at this time. [LOS ANGELES TIMES, 9/19/2001] A source within AXA will later say, “There are indications that the shorting has been going on for some time. People inside the company could not understand why” there had been so much shorting of the stock in recent weeks. “This could give some explanation why the stocks were going down so much when there seemed to be no apparent reason.” AXA shares drop almost 10 percent in the week before 9/11, and will plummet afterwards. The attacks will cost the company up to $400 million because of its coverage of both airplanes and buildings. [LOS ANGELES TIMES, 9/18/2001]
1589Entity Tags: Swiss Reinsurance, AXA, US Securities and Exchange Commission, Munich Re
1590Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1591Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1592Early September 2001: NYSE Sees Unusually Heavy Trading in Airline and Related Stocks
1593   
1594The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) later announces that they are investigating the trading of shares of 38 companies in the days just before 9/11. The San Francisco Chronicle reports that the New York Stock Exchange sees “unusually heavy trading in airline and related stocks several days before the attacks.” All 38 companies logically stand to be heavily affected by the attacks. They include parent companies of major airlines American, Continental, Delta, Northwest, Southwest, United, and US Airways as well as cruise lines Carnival and Royal Caribbean, aircraft maker Boeing and defense contractor Lockheed Martin. The SEC is also looking into suspicious short selling of numerous insurance company stocks, but, to date, no details of this investigation have been released. [ASSOCIATED PRESS, 10/2/2001; SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, 10/3/2001]
1595Entity Tags: US Securities and Exchange Commission, New York Stock Exchange
1596Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1597Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1598Early September 2001: Seattle Security Guard Tells Friend of Impending Attack
1599   
1600A few days before 9/11, a Seattle security guard of Middle Eastern descent tells an East Coast friend on the phone that terrorists will soon attack the US. After 9/11, the friend tells the FBI, and passes a lie detector test. The security guard refuses to cooperate with the FBI or take a lie detector test. He is not arrested—apparently the FBI determines that while he may have had 9/11 foreknowledge, he was not involved in the plot. [SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER, 10/12/2001]
1601Entity Tags: Federal Bureau of Investigation
1602Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1603Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1604Early September 2001: Unusually High Volume Trade of US Treasury Note Purchases
1605   
1606After 9/11, both the SEC and the Secret Service announce probes into an unusually high volume trade of five-year US Treasury note purchases around this time. These transactions include a single $5 billion trade. The Wall Street Journal explains: “Five-year Treasury notes are among the best investments in the event of a world crisis, especially one that hits the US. The notes are prized for their safety and their backing by the US government, and usually rally when investors flee riskier investments, such as stocks.” The value of these notes has risen sharply since the events of September 11. The article also points out that with these notes, “tracks would be hard to spot.” [WALL STREET JOURNAL, 10/2/2001]
1607Entity Tags: US Securities and Exchange Commission, US Secret Service
1608Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1609Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1610Early September 2001: Suspicion of Insider Trading in Many Other Countries
1611   
1612Numerous other overseas investigations into insider trading before 9/11 are later established. There are investigations in Belgium, France, Switzerland, Luxembourg, Monte Carlo, Cyprus, and other countries. There are particularly strong suspicions British markets are manipulated. Italy will later investigate suspicious share movements on the day of the attack, as well as the previous day. Japan will also look into the trading of futures contracts. [BBC, 9/18/2001;FOX NEWS, 9/22/2001; CNN, 9/24/2001] The British will take just two weeks to conclude that their markets were not manipulated. [AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA, 10/17/2001]
1613Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1614Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge, Al-Qaeda in Italy
1615Early September 2001: Almost Irrefutable Proof of Insider Trading in Germany
1616   
1617 Ernst Welteke. [Source: Publicity photo]German central bank president Ernst Welteke later reports that a study by his bank indicates, “There are ever clearer signs that there were activities on international financial markets that must have been carried out with the necessary expert knowledge,” not only in shares of heavily affected industries such as airlines and insurance companies, but also in gold and oil. [DAILY TELEGRAPH, 9/23/2001] His researchers have found “almost irrefutable proof of insider trading.”[MIAMI HERALD, 9/24/2001] “If you look at movements in markets before and after the attack, it makes your brow furrow. But it is extremely difficult to really verify it.” Nevertheless, he believes that “in one or the other case it will be possible to pinpoint the source.”[FOX NEWS, 9/22/2001] Welteke reports “a fundamentally inexplicable rise” in oil prices before the attacks [MIAMI HERALD, 9/24/2001] and then a further rise of 13 percent the day after the attacks. Gold rises nonstop for days after the attacks. [DAILY TELEGRAPH, 9/23/2001]
1618Entity Tags: Ernst Welteke
1619Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1620Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1621Early September 2001: Phone Call Warning of Big Event in the US in Coming Days Is Just One of Many Such Warnings Recorded by CIA
1622   
1623 Mamdouh Habib. [Source: Public domain]A few days before 9/11, an Islamic radical named Mamdouh Habib is in Pakistan and calls his wife in Australia. Her phone is being monitored by Australian intelligence. In the conversation he says that something big is going to happen in the US in the next few days. He will be arrested after 9/11 and held by the US in the Guantanamo prison before finally being released in 2005. He will be released because his captors eventually will decide that he did not have any special foreknowledge or involvement in the 9/11 plot. He had been in Afghanistan training camps and had picked up the information there. The New York Times will paraphrase an Australian official, “Just about everyone in Kandahar [Afghanistan] and the Qaeda camps knew that something big was coming, he said. ‘There was a buzz.’” [NEW YORK TIMES, 1/29/2005]Furthermore, according to The Australian, this call “mirrored several other conversations between accused terrorists that were tapped around the same time by the Pakistani Internal Security Department on behalf of the CIA.” This was part of what the CIA called a sharp increase in “chatter” intercepted from operatives in al-Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan and Pakistan in the days just before the attacks, alluding to an imminent big event. [AUSTRALIAN, 2/2/2005]
1624Entity Tags: Pakistani Internal Security Department, Central Intelligence Agency,Mamdouh Habib
1625Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1626Category Tags: Warning Signs, Remote Surveillance, Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge,Key Warnings
1627Early September 2001: Iranian Inmate in Germany Warns of Imminent Attack on WTC
1628   
1629An Iranian man known as Ali S. in a German jail awaiting deportation repeatedly phones US law enforcement to warn of an imminent attack on the WTC in early September. He calls it “an attack that will change the world.” After a month of badgering his prison guards, he is finally able to call the White House 14 times in the days before the attack. He then tries to send a fax to President Bush, but is denied permission hours before the 9/11 attacks. German police later confirm the calls. Prosecutors later will say Ali had no foreknowledge and his forebodings were just a strange coincidence. They will say he is mentally unstable. [DEUTSCHE PRESSE-AGENTUR (HAMBURG), 9/13/2001; ANANOVA, 9/14/2001; SUNDAY HERALD (GLASGOW), 9/16/2001; OTTAWA CITIZEN, 9/17/2001]
1630Entity Tags: World Trade Center, Ali S., George W. Bush
1631Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1632Category Tags: Warning Signs, Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge, Al-Qaeda in Germany
1633Early September 2001: Pakistani Student Says WTC Towers ‘Won’t Be Here Next Week’
1634   
1635 New Utrecht High School. [Source: National Geographic]At New Utrecht High School, in Brooklyn, New York City, about one week before 9/11, a Pakistani student in a bilingual class points at the WTC during a heated political argument and declares, “Look at those two buildings. They won’t be here next week.” The teacher notifies New York police after 9/11, who in turn notify the FBI. The status of the FBI investigation into this incident is unknown as of early October 2001. [NEW YORK DAILY NEWS, 10/12/2001]
1636Entity Tags: Federal Bureau of Investigation,World Trade Center
1637Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1638Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1639Early September 2001: Sharp Increase in Short Selling of American and United Airlines Stocks
1640   
1641There is a sharp increase in the short selling of American and United Airlines stocks on the New York Stock Exchange prior to 9/11. A short sell is a bet that a particular stock will drop. Short selling increases 40 percent over the previous month for these two airlines, compared to an 11 percent increase for other big airlines and one percent for the exchange overall. United’s stock will drops 43 percent and American 39 percent the first day the market reopens after the attack. [REUTERS, 9/20/2001; SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, 9/22/2001] There is also a short spike in the short interest in Dutch airline KLM three to seven days before 9/11, reaching historically unprecedented levels. [USA TODAY, 9/26/2001]
1642Entity Tags: American Airlines, United Airlines, New York Stock Exchange
1643Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1644Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1645September 4, 2001: Secret Embedded Messages Help Show Milan Al-Qaeda Have 9/11 Foreknowledge
1646   
1647At least one member of the al-Qaeda cell in Milan, Italy, apparently uses steganography, a method of encoding messages within computerized photographs. In Milan’s Via Quaranta mosque in Milan, frequented by Egyptian al-Qaeda operative Mahmoud Es Sayed, pictures of the World Trade Center that have steganographic messages in them are saved on a computer. A number of other pictures of world leaders and pornography are also manipulated in a similar manner. These pictures will not be discovered until months after 9/11, but they help suggest that some in the Milan cell had foreknowledge of the 9/11 plot. Es Sayed had been wiretapped on previous occasions, and was heard making comments suggesting he had such foreknowledge (see August 12, 2000) (see January 24, 2001). His current whereabouts are unknown. [ABC NEWS, 5/8/2003]
1648Entity Tags: Al-Qaeda, Mahmoud Es Sayed, World Trade Center
1649Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1650Category Tags: Warning Signs, Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge, Al-Qaeda in Italy
1651September 5, 2001: Prisoner in Brazil Tries to Give Warning about 9/11 Attacks
1652   
1653A Moroccan militant in a prison in Brazil apparently makes an unheeded warning about the 9/11 attacks. Gueddan Abdel Fatah was imprisoned in January 2001 after a hold-up attempt. On September 5, 2001, he hands a letter to a lawyer named Edith Espinosa, and asks her to take copies to head of the Brazilian prison system and the US embassy. [BBC, 9/15/2001] Espinosa forgets to deliver the letter. On September 10, he sees her again and says that any warning now would be too late. [UNITED PRESS INTERNATIONAL, 10/1/2001] In the letter, Fatah says, “I need to talk urgently about very important issues.” He says he intends to reveal information about militant groups that are planning attacks, and he makes reference to “two explosions” that could take place in the US. Shortly after 9/11, he will be questioned and says he was working with a group of Muslim militants in the tri-border area between Brazil, Argentina, and Paraguay that is a known haven for many Muslim extremist groups. One member of the group had a contact in New York City and “was constantly phoning the United States and holding coded conversations.” This member allegedly told him, “We are waiting for the United States to explode.” [BBC, 9/15/2001] Fatah claims that he visited the US consulates in Argentina and Brazil before his arrest eight months earlier and tried to pass on the warning, but no one paid attention to him. [UNITED PRESS INTERNATIONAL, 10/1/2001] Both Osama bin Laden and 9/11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed visited the tri-border area in previous years (see December 1995 and June 1998).
1654Entity Tags: Gueddan Abdel Fatah, Edith Espinosa
1655Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1656Category Tags: Warning Signs, Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge, Possible Hijacker Associates in US
1657September 6, 2001: New York Student Forecasts Destruction of WTC
1658   
1659Antoinette DiLorenzo, teaching English to a class of Pakistani immigrants, asks a student gazing out the window, “What are you looking at?” The student points towards the WTC, and says, “Do you see those two buildings? They won’t be standing there next week.” At the time, nothing is thought of it, but on September 13, the FBI will interview all the people in the classroom and confirm the event. The FBI later places the boy’s family under surveillance but apparently is unable to find a connection to the 9/11 plot. An MSNBC reporter later sets out to disprove this “urban myth,” but to his surprise, finds all the details of the story are confirmed. The fact that the family members are recent immigrants from Pakistan might mean the information came from Pakistan.[MSNBC, 10/12/2001] Supposedly, on November 9, 2001, the same student predicts there will be a plane crash on November 12. On that day, American Airlines Flight 587 will crash on takeoff from New York, killing 260 people. Investigators will later determine that the crash is accidental. One official at the school later says many Arab-American students have come forward with their own stories about having prior knowledge before 9/11: “Kids are telling us that the attacks didn’t surprise them. This was a nicely protected little secret that circulated in the community around here.” [INSIGHT, 9/10/2002]
1660Entity Tags: World Trade Center, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Antoinette DiLorenzo
1661Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1662Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1663September 6-10 September, 2001: Large Number of Shares of WTC Security Company Bought
1664   
1665Two unnamed investors buy a large number of shares of Stratesec, a company that provides airport security systems and which also has a contract to help provide security at the World Trade Center (see October 1996). Stratesec’s stock will increase in value from $0.75 per share on 9/11 to $1.49 per share when the market reopens on September 17. The value of the unnamed investors’ 56,000 shares will rise by over $50,000 in the weeks following the attacks. The purchase will draw the attention of the Securities and Exchange Commission after 9/11, when it reviews possible profiteering by individuals with foreknowledge of the attacks. However, the FBI will find no evidence of a terrorist link and so decide not to pursue an investigation of the trades (see also July 22, 2004). [9/11 COMMISSION, 8/18/2003, PP. 4-5  ]
1666Entity Tags: Stratesec
1667Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1668Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1669September 6, 2001: FAA Places Severe Flight Restrictions on Author Because of Attack Threat
1670   
1671 Salman Rushdie. [Source: Public domain]The FAA places severe flight restrictions on author Salman Rushdie, who is in the US to promote a new book. The restrictions are so strict and costly that at least two airlines refuse to fly him at all. The FAA tells Rushdie’s publisher that US intelligence has given warning of “something out there” but fails to give any further details. One newspaper will later state, “The FAA confirmed that it stepped up security measures concerning Mr. Rushdie but refused to give a reason.” [LONDON TIMES, 9/27/2001; DAILY MAIL, 10/7/2001] The Daily Mail will later report that the CIA secretly gave the FAA a “confidential warning that Muslim fundamentalists were preparing a spectacular attack imminently, but it was unable to specify the target.” But the only action the FAA takes is to require more security for Rushdie’s flights (seeShortly Before September 6, 2001). Rushdie had been the subject of an Iranian fatwa (death threat) until it was lifted in 1998. [MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTINEL, 9/23/2001]
1672Entity Tags: Salman Rushdie, Federal Aviation Administration
1673Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1674Category Tags: Warning Signs, Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge, US Air Security
1675September 6, 2001: Bin Laden Allegedly Informed of Exact 9/11 Attacks Date
1676   
1677According to a later interview with would-be hijacker Ramzi bin al-Shibh, a courier sent by bin al-Shibh tells Osama bin Laden on this day when the 9/11 attacks will take place. [AUSTRALIAN, 9/9/2002] However, there are doubts about this interview (see April, June, or August 2002). The message may have been taken from bin al-Shibh in Germany to Pakistan by al-Qaeda Hamburg cell member Zakariya Essabar (see Late August 2001).
1678Entity Tags: Osama bin Laden, Zakariya Essabar, Ramzi bin al-Shibh
1679Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1680Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge, Osama Bin Laden, Ramzi Bin Al-Shibh,Al-Qaeda in Germany
1681September 6-10, 2001: Suspicious Trading of Put Option Contracts on American and United Airlines Occur
1682   
1683 A. B. “Buzzy” Krongard.[Source: Public domain]Suspicious trading occurs on the stock of American and United, the two airlines hijacked in the 9/11 attacks. “Between 6 and 7 September, the Chicago Board Options Exchange [sees] purchases of 4,744 put option contracts [a speculation that the stock will go down] in UAL versus 396 call options—where a speculator bets on a price rising. Holders of the put options would [net] a profit of $5 million once the carrier’s share price [dive] after September 11. On September 10, 4,516 put options in American Airlines, the other airline involved in the hijackings, [are] purchased in Chicago. This compares with a mere 748 call options in American purchased that day. Investigators cannot help but notice that no other airlines [see] such trading in their put options.” One analyst later says, “I saw put-call numbers higher than I’ve ever seen in ten years of following the markets, particularly the options markets.” [ASSOCIATED PRESS, 9/18/2001; SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, 9/19/2001] “To the embarrassment of investigators, it has also [learned] that the firm used to buy many of the ‘put’ options… on United Airlines stock was headed until 1998 by ‘Buzzy’ Krongard, now executive director of the CIA.” Krongard was chairman of Alex Brown Inc., which was bought by Deutsche Bank. “His last post before resigning to take his senior role in the CIA was to head Bankers Trust—Alex Brown’s private client business, dealing with the accounts and investments of wealthy customers around the world.” [INDEPENDENT, 10/14/2001]
1684Entity Tags: Chicago Board Options Exchange, United Airlines, American Airlines,Deutsche Bank, Computer Assisted Passenger Prescreening System
1685Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1686Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1687September 6-10, 2001: Suspicious Trading on Stocks of Two Large WTC Tenants
1688   
1689The Chicago Board Options Exchange sees suspicious trading on Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley, two of the largest WTC tenants. In the first week of September, an average of 27 put option contracts in its shares are bought each day. Then the total for the three days before the attacks is 2,157. Merrill Lynch, another WTC tenant, see 12,215 put options bought between September 7-10, when the previous days had seen averages of 252 contracts a day.[INDEPENDENT, 10/14/2001] Dylan Ratigan of Bloomberg Business News, speaking of the trading on Morgan Stanley and other companies, says, “This would be one of the most extraordinary coincidences in the history of mankind if it was a coincidence.” [ABC NEWS, 9/20/2001]
1690Entity Tags: Morgan Stanley, World Trade Center, Dylan Ratigan, American Airlines,Chicago Board Options Exchange
1691Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1692Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1693September 7-10, 2001: Dubai Banker Claims Al-Qaeda Agent Speculates on Airline and Blue-Chip Stocks
1694   
1695French author Bernard-Henri Levy claims to know an anonymous manager at a Dubai, United Arab Emirates, bank who gives him astute and accurate tips on Arab banking. The manager tells Henri-Levy in 2002, “We know a bank here that made [a put option] transaction between the 8th and 10th of September on certain Dow Jones blue-chip stocks for accounts linked to bin Laden. I know the name of a bank that, by shorting 8,000 shares of United Airlines on the 7th of September, then 1,200 shares of American Airlines on the morning of the 10th, allowed the attack to finance itself.” The manager won’t name the bank, but he quotes bin Laden from a late September 2001 interview, stating, “al-Qaeda is full of young, modern, and educated people who are aware of the cracks inside the Western financial system, and know how to exploit them. These faults and weaknesses are like a sliding noose strangling the system.” [DAILY UMMAT (KARACHI), 9/28/2001; LEVY, 2003, PP. 312-313] The timing and amount of type of stock speculation mentioned in this account is similar to, but not the same as, previously published reports (see September 6-10, 2001). Levy suspects the al-Qaeda agent making these transactions is the financially astute Saeed Sheikh, graduate of the London School of Economics. An al-Qaeda agent using the alias Mustafa Ahmad is captured by a surveillance camera entering the Bank of Dubai on September 10, Dubai time, to pick up money sent by Mohamed Atta in previous days, but this video footage has never been publicly released. Levy and others argue that Mustafa Ahmad and Saeed Sheikh are one and the same (see September 5-10, 2001). [LEVY, 2003, PP. 312-313]
1696Entity Tags: Al-Qaeda, Saeed Sheikh, American Airlines, Osama bin Laden, United Airlines
1697Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1698Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge, Saeed Sheikh
1699September 9, 2001: Internet Forum Message Apparently Warns of 9/11 Attack
1700   
1701A message is posted on Alsaha.com, a website based in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, apparently warning of the 9/11 attacks. It proclaims that in the next two days, a “big surprise” is coming from the Saudi Arabian region of Asir, the remote, mountainous province that produced most of the 19 hijackers who strike on September 11. After 9/11, the FBI and CIA will closely monitor this website as “a kind of terrorist early-warning system” due to its popularity with Muslim fundamentalists. However, it is doubtful if they are monitoring the site before 9/11, or notice this message. [NEWSWEEK, 5/25/2003] Additionally, on September 10, someone in Jordan will post on a website that an attack is close to “zero hour.” [TENET, 2007, PP. 233]
1702Entity Tags: United Arab Emirates, Central Intelligence Agency, Alsaha.com, Federal Bureau of Investigation
1703Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1704Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1705September 10, 2001: Likely Hijacker Associates in Florida Allegedly Predict American Bloodshed Tomorrow
1706   
1707 The Pink Pony strip club. [Source: Durand Patrick / Corbis]In the Pink Pony strip club in Daytona Beach, Florida the night before the 9/11 attacks, three men make anti-American sentiments and talk of impending bloodshed. One says, “Wait ‘til tomorrow. America is going to see bloodshed.” These are not any of the hijackers, since they had all left Florida by this time, but it is suspected these men knew the hijackers. [ASSOCIATED PRESS, 9/14/2001; MSNBC, 9/23/2001] Mohamed Atta is said to have regularly frequented the same bar (seeBefore September 11, 2001). However, in September 2002, the St. Petersburg Times will report, “Some other famous terrorist sightings never panned out, including that of the manager at a Daytona Beach strip club, who told the world he heard three men spewing anti-American venom and predicting bloodshed the night of Sept. 10. When his story seemed to change with each telling, law enforcement moved on.” [ST. PETERSBURG TIMES, 9/1/2002]
1708Entity Tags: Mohamed Atta
1709Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1710Category Tags: Possible Hijacker Associates in US, Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1711September 10, 2001: Alarm Bells Sound over Unusual Trading in US Stock Options Market
1712   
1713According to CBS News, in the afternoon before the attack, “alarm bells were sounding over unusual trading in the US stock options market.” It has been documented that the CIA, the Mossad, and many other intelligence agencies monitor stock trading in real time using highly advanced programs such as Promis. Both the FBI and the Justice Department have confirmed the use of such programs for US intelligence gathering through at least this summer. This would confirm that the CIA should have had additional advance warning of imminent attacks against American and United Airlines planes. [CBS NEWS, 9/19/2001] There are even allegations that bin Laden was able to get a copy of Promis. [FOX NEWS, 10/16/2001]
1714Entity Tags: Promis, Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation, US Department of Justice, Israel Institute for Intelligence and Special Tasks (Mossad)
1715Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1716Category Tags: Warning Signs, Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1717Before September 11, 2001: US Informs Taliban Official that Bin Laden Is Planning Attack on US
1718   
1719Afghanistan’s ambassador to Pakistan, Abdul Salam Zaeef, is approached by his US counterpart and warned that Osama bin Laden is planning an attack on the US. According to Zaeef’s 2010 memoir, at some point before 9/11 Zaeef is contacted by William Milam, the US ambassador to Pakistan, who “unexpectedly asked for an appointment that very same day. (The Americans occasionally got agitated over small things.)” Milam insists on the meeting, although Zaeef is tired, and comes to visit him at his home, accompanied by Paula Thedi, political affairs officer to the US ambassador in Pakistan. According to Zaeef’s book, Milam “seemed worried and impatient and started to talk as soon as he entered the room.” He tells Zaeef: “Our intelligence reports reveal that Osama is planning a major attack on America. This is why we had to come immediately at such a late hour. You need to tell officials in Afghanistan to prevent the attacks!” Zaeef will write that he immediately forwards the ambassador’s concerns to Kabul, and Kabul responds 23 hours later with a letter that states: “Afghanistan has no intention to harm the United States of America now or in the future. We do not condone attacks of any kind against America and prevent anyone from using Afghan soil to plan or train for any such attacks.” Zaeef will say he personally translates this statement from Pashtu and passes it to the American ambassador. Immediately after 9/11, Zaeef will issue a similar statement to the media on Kabul’s stance, which says: “We strongly condemn the events that happened in the United States at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. We share the grief of all those who have lost their nearest and dearest in these incidents. All those responsible must be brought to justice. We want them to be brought to justice, and we want America to be patient and careful in their actions.” Zaeef will be detained after the US invasion of Afghanistan and held for several years, including a spell in Guantanamo, before his release without charge. [ZAEEF, 1/20/2010, PP. 138]
1720Entity Tags: Abdul Salam Zaeef, William Milam, Paula Thedi
1721Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1722September 10, 2001: Trader Makes Suspicious Investments Moves; Later Accused of 9/11 Foreknowledge
1723   
1724 Amr “Tony” Elgindy. [Source: San Diego Union Tribune]Amr Elgindy orders his broker to liquidate his children’s $300,000 trust account fearing a sudden crash in the market. He also tells his stockbroker that the Dow Jones average, then at 9,600, will fall to below 3,000. Elgindy is arrested in San Diego in May 2002, along with FBI agents Jeffrey Royer and Lynn Wingate, who, according to government prosecutors, were using their FBI positions to obtain inside information on various corporations. They also questioned whether Elgindy had foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks. [NEW YORK TIMES, 5/23/2002; LONDON TIMES, 5/30/2002; NEW YORK TIMES, 6/8/2002] A report published in the San Diego Union-Tribune, however, casts some doubt on the government’s allegations. [SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE, 6/16/2002] In 2005, now former FBI agent Jeffrey Royer admits to giving Elgindy confidential details of federal investigations, including a probe of the 9/11 attacks. Royer claims he did it to use Elgindy’s knowledge to help develop evidence of criminal wrongdoing. A court case against Royer and Elgindy continues. [ASSOCIATED PRESS, 1/5/2005]
1725Entity Tags: Jeffrey Royer, Lynn Wingate, Amr Elgindy
1726Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1727Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1728September 10, 2001: Dallas Fifth Grader Forecasts World War III
1729   
1730A fifth grader in Dallas, Texas, casually tells his teacher, “Tomorrow, World War III will begin. It will begin in the United States, and the United States will lose.” The teacher reports the comment to the FBI, but does not know if they act on it at the time. The student skips the next two days of school. The event may be completely coincidental, but the newspaper that reports the story also notes that two charities, Holy Land Foundation and InfoCom, located in an adjacent suburb have been under investigation based on suspected fund-raising activities for Islamic militant organizations. One InfoCom employee had his name in the telephone book of Wadih El-Hage, bin Laden’s personal secretary, and he was seen with El-Hage as recently as 1998 (see September 16, 1998-September 5, 2001). [HOUSTON CHRONICLE, 9/19/2001] The FBI investigates and decides “no further investigation [is] warranted.” [HOUSTON CHRONICLE, 10/1/2001]
1731Entity Tags: Federal Bureau of Investigation
1732Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1733Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge, Wadih El-Hage
1734September 10, 2001: New Jersey Student Warns Teacher to Stay Away from Lower Manhattan
1735   
1736A sixth-grade student of Middle Eastern descent in Jersey City, New Jersey, says something that alarms his teacher at Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary School. “Essentially, he [warns] her to stay away from lower Manhattan because something bad [is] going to happen,” says Sgt. Edgar Martinez, deputy director of police services for the Jersey City Police Department. [INSIGHT, 9/10/2002]
1737Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1738Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1739September 10, 2001: Suspicious Trading on United Airlines Stock Occurs at Pacific Exchange
1740   
1741The trading ratio on United Airlines is 25 times greater than normal at the Pacific Exchange. Pacific Exchange officials later decline to state whether this abnormality is being investigated. [SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, 9/19/2001]
1742Entity Tags: United Airlines, Pacific Exchange
1743Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1744Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1745(1:00 a.m.) September 11, 2001: Hours before Attacks, San Francisco Mayor Receives Warning
1746   
1747 Willie Brown. [Source: San Francisco City Government]Eight hours prior to the terrorist attacks, San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown receives a warning from his “security people at the airport,” advising him to be cautious in traveling. [SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, 9/12/2001] Later reports will claim that this is because someone saw the State Department warning of September 7 (see September 7, 2001), which focused on the threat to military personnel in Asia. Brown is scheduled to fly to New York the next morning. [US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 9/7/2001; SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, 9/12/2001; SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, 9/14/2001] The source of the warning, and why it is personally issued to Brown, will remain unknown.
1748Entity Tags: Willie Brown
1749Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1750Category Tags: All Day of 9/11 Events, Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1751September 11, 2001: More Than $100 Million Rushed from WTC
1752   
1753Data recovery experts later looking at 32 hard drives salvaged from the 9/11 attacks discover a surge in credit card transactions from the World Trade Center in the hours before and during the attacks. Unusually large sums of money are rushed through computers even as the disaster unfolds. Investigators later say: “There is a suspicion that some people had advance knowledge of the approximate time of the plane crashes in order to move out amounts exceeding $100 million. They thought that the records of their transactions could not be traced after the mainframes were destroyed.” The data recovery effort is led by the German company Convar. Convar will not disclose the identity of its clients. [REUTERS, 12/17/2001; REUTERS, 12/19/2001; IDG NEWS SERVICE, 12/20/2001]
1754Entity Tags: World Trade Center, Convar, Gmbh
1755Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1756Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge, All Day of 9/11 Events
1757September 11, 2001: French Bank Allegedly Makes ‘a Fortune’ in Response to Attacks
1758   
1759 Jérôme Kerviel. [Source: Agence France-Presse]French bank Société Générale supposedly makes “a fortune” through trading, in response to the 9/11 attacks. This is according to rogue trader Jérôme Kerviel, who is employed by the bank between 2000 and 2008. In a 2009 interview with the French newspaper Le Parisien, Kerviel will say: “The best trading day in the history of Société Générale was September 11, 2001. At least, that’s what one of my managers told me.” He will add, “I don’t know how much they made, but apparently the gains were colossal.” Kerviel will not state how the bank makes these gains, but indicates it is through the short-selling of stock. He will continue the interview by saying, “I had a similar experience during the London attacks in July 2005” (see July 7, 2005), and then describe how he’d bet on a fall in the share price of German insurance company Allianz a few days before those attacks. The London bombings will cause the price of Allianz stock to crash, thereby earning Kerviel ”€500,000 in a few minutes.” [EVENING STANDARD, 1/22/2009; LONDON TIMES, 1/23/2009] Société Générale is France’s second largest bank, and one of the largest banks in Europe.[GUARDIAN, 1/24/2008; INTERNATIONAL HERALD TRIBUNE, 1/24/2008] At the time of his interview with Le Parisien, Kerviel is alleged to have caused it record losses of almost €5 billion through his rogue dealings. He is under investigation for breach of trust, fabricating documents, and accessing computers illegally.[LONDON TIMES, 1/23/2009]
1760Entity Tags: Société Générale, Jérôme Kerviel
1761Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1762Category Tags: All Day of 9/11 Events, Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1763September 14, 2001: Deutsche Bank Exec Resigns, Prompting Speculations of 9/11 Connection
1764   
1765Mayo Shattuck III resigns, effective immediately, as head of the Alex Brown unit of Deutsche Bank. No reason is given. Some speculate later that this could have to do with the role of Deutsche Bank in the pre-9/11 purchases of put options on the stock of companies most affected by 9/11. Deutsche Bank is also one of the four banks most used by the bin Laden family. [NEW YORK TIMES, 9/15/2001; WALL STREET JOURNAL, 9/27/2001]
1766Entity Tags: Osama bin Laden, Deutsche Bank, Mayo Shattuck III
1767Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1768Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1769September 17, 2001: Italian Defense Minister Believes Terrorists ‘Behind Speculation on the International Markets’
1770   
1771 Antonio Martino. [Source: US Navy]Italian Defense Minister Antonio Martino says: “I think that there are terrorist states and organizations behind speculation on the international markets. Those who organized the attacks on New York are clear-minded in their folly. Because everybody knows that money is power.” He adds: “Those who acted certainly tried to cover the tracks of the operation. But if the intelligence services of all countries work together, the financiers who work for the terrorists will not escape the hunt.” [AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE, 9/17/2001] The same day, the BBC reports, “Italian stock authorities [are] investigating abnormal movements in share prices on the Milan stock exchange prior to the terrorist attacks.” [LOS ANGELES TIMES, 9/18/2001] Further, it is reported that around 1995 several intelligence services investigated Osama bin Laden investing in European stock markets through an unnamed broker in Milan (see 1995).
1772Entity Tags: Osama bin Laden, Antonio Martino
1773Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1774Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1775September 29, 2001: $2.5 Million in Airline Options Go Unclaimed
1776   
1777$2.5 million in put options on American Airlines and United Airlines are reported unclaimed. This is likely the result of the suspension in trading on the New York Stock Exchange after the attacks which gave the SEC time to be waiting if the owners showed up to redeem their put options placed the week before the 9/11 attacks. [SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, 9/29/2001]
1778Entity Tags: New York Stock Exchange, American Airlines, United Airlines
1779Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1780Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1781October 16, 2001: Bin Laden Cleared of Insider Trading in Britain
1782   
1783“The Financial Services Authority—Britain’s main financial regulator—has cleared bin Laden and his henchmen of insider trading. There has been a widespread suspicion that members of the al-Qaeda organization had cashed in on the US attacks, dumping airline, aerospace and insurance company shares before September 11th. The Authority says that after a thorough investigation, it has found no hard evidence of any such deals in London.” [AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA, 10/17/2001] On September 24, Belgium’s Financial Minister had claimed there were strong suspicions that British markets may have been used for 9/11-related insider trading in early September. [CNN, 9/24/2001]
1784Entity Tags: Al-Qaeda, Financial Services Authority
1785Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1786Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge
1787June 3, 2002: Results of 9/11 Related Insider Trading Inquiries Are Still Unknown
1788   
1789A rare follow-up article about insider trading based on 9/11 foreknowledge confirms that numerous inquiries in the US and around the world are still ongoing. However, “all are treating these inquiries as if they were state secrets.” The author speculates: “The silence from the investigating camps could mean any of several things: Either terrorists are responsible for the puts on the airline stocks; others besides terrorists had foreknowledge; the puts were just lucky bets by credible investors; or, there is nothing whatsoever to support the insider-trading rumors.” [INSIGHT, 6/3/2002] Another article notes that Deutsche Bank Alex Brown, the American investment banking arm of German giant Deutsche Bank, purchased at least some of these options. Deutsche Bank Alex Brown was once headed by “Buzzy” Krongard, who quit that company in March 2001 and became Executive Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). “This fact may not be significant. And then again, it may. After all, there has traditionally been a close link between the CIA, big banks, and the brokerage business.” [BUSINESS LINE, 2/11/2002]
1790Entity Tags: A.B. (“Buzzy”) Krongard, Deutsche Bank, Central Intelligence Agency
1791Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1792Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge, 9/11 Investigations, FBI 9/11 Investigation, Other 9/11 Investigations
1793September 10, 2003: SEC, Others Still Keep Mum About Insider Trading Investigations
1794   
1795Slate reports that two years after the 9/11 attacks, neither the Chicago Board Options Exchange nor the Securities and Exchange Commission will make any comment about their investigations into insider trading before 9/11. “Neither has announced any conclusion. The SEC has not filed any complaint alleging illegal activity, nor has the Justice Department announced any investigation or prosecution.… So, unless the SEC decides to file a complaint—unlikely at this late stage—we may never know what they learned about terror trading.” [SLATE, 9/10/2003]
1796Entity Tags: US Department of Justice, US Securities and Exchange Commission, Chicago Board Options Exchange
1797Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1798Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge, Other 9/11 Investigations, 9/11 Investigations
1799September 19, 2003: FBI Finds No Proof of 9/11 Insider Trading
1800   
1801Spokesperson Paul Bresson announces that the FBI has concluded that there was no insider trading in US securities markets by people with advance knowledge of the 9/11 attacks. According to Bresson, the “vast majority” of a pre-attack surge of trading in options that bet on a drop in the stock of AMR Corp., which owns American Airlines, and UAL Corp., which owns United Airlines, was conducted by investment hedge funds implementing bearish investment strategies or hedging a line position of common stock, and was not linked to terrorists. [9/11 COMMISSION, 8/18/2003  ; ST. PETERSBURG TIMES, 9/19/2003;WASHINGTON POST, 9/19/2003] However, seven months later, a paper by a professor of finance at the University of Illinois will conclude that “there is evidence of unusual option market activity in the days leading up to September 11” (seeApril 25, 2004). [POTESHMAN, 3/10/2004]
1802Entity Tags: Federal Bureau of Investigation, American Airlines, Paul Bresson, United Airlines
1803Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1804Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge, FBI 9/11 Investigation, 9/11 Investigations
1805April 25, 2004: Academic Paper Determines 9/11 Insider Trading Not Due to Chance
1806   
1807Allen Poteshman, a professor of finance at the University of Illinois, publishes a paper demonstrating that the insider trading in options on United and American airline stocks indicates someone profited from foreknowledge of 9/11. Poteshman concludes, “There is evidence of unusual option market activity in the days leading up to September 11.” [POTESHMAN, 3/10/2004; CHICAGO TRIBUNE, 4/25/2004]
1808Entity Tags: Allen Poteshman
1809Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1810Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge, Other 9/11 Investigations, 9/11 Investigations
1811July 22, 2004: 9/11 Commission Finds No 9/11 Insider Trading
1812   
1813The 9/11 Commission dismisses allegations of insider trading in the days preceding 9/11, in a footnote contained in its final report. According to the report, the put options for the parent companies of United Airlines were placed by a “US-based institutional investor with no conceivable ties to al-Qaeda as part of a trading strategy that also included buying 115,000 shares of American on September 10.” With respect to the highly suspicious trading in the parent company of American Airlines, the Commission states that many of the trades were “traced to a specific US-based options trading newsletter, faxed to its subscribers on Sunday, September 9, which recommended these trades.” According to the Commission: “The SEC and the FBI, aided by other agencies and the securities industry, devoted enormous resources to investigating this issue, including securing the cooperation of many foreign governments. These investigators have found that the apparently suspicious consistently proved innocuous.” [9/11 COMMISSION, 7/24/2004, PP. 499]
1814Entity Tags: United Airlines, US Securities and Exchange Commission, 9/11 Commission,American Airlines, Al-Qaeda, Federal Bureau of Investigation
1815Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline
1816Category Tags: Insider Trading/ Foreknowledge, 9/11 Commission, 9/11 Investigations
1817http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?before_9/11=insidertrading&timeline=complete_911_timeline
1818
1819SEC: Government Destroyed Documents Regarding Pre-9/11 Put Options
1820Posted on June 15, 2010 by WashingtonsBlog
1821On September 19, 2001, CBS reported:
1822Sources tell CBS News that the afternoon before the attack, alarm bells were sounding over unusual trading in the U.S. stock options market.
1823An extraordinary number of trades were betting that American Airlines stock price would fall.
1824The trades are called “puts” and they involved at least 450,000 shares of American. But what raised the red flag is more than 80 percent of the orders were “puts”, far outnumbering “call” options, those betting the stock would rise.
1825Sources say they have never seen that kind of imbalance before, reports CBS News Correspondent Sharyl Attkisson. Normally the numbers are fairly even.
1826After the terrorist attacks, American Airline stock price did fall obviously by 39 percent, and according to sources, that translated into well over $5 million total profit for the person or persons who bet the stock would fall.
1827***
1828At least one Wall Street firm reported their suspicions about this activity to the SEC shortly after the attack.
1829The same thing happened with United Airlines on the Chicago Board Options Exchange four days before the attack. An extremely unbalanced number of trades betting United’s stock price would fall — also transformed into huge profits when it did after the hijackings.
1830“We can directly work backwards from a trade on the floor of the Chicago Board Options Exchange. The trader is linked to a brokerage firm. The brokerage firm received the order to buy that ‘put’ option from either someone within a brokerage firm speculating, or from one of the customers,” said Randall Dodd of the Economic Strategy Institute.
1831
1832U.S. investigators want to know whether Osama bin Laden was the ultimate “inside trader” — profiting from a tragedy he’s suspected of masterminding to finance his operation. Authorities are also investigating possibly suspicious trading in Germany, Switzerland, Italy and Japan.
1833On September 29, 2001, the San Francisco Chronicle pointed out:
1834“Usually, if someone has a windfall like that, you take the money and run,” said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “Whoever did this thought the exchange would not be closed for four days.
1835“This smells real bad.”
1836***
1837There was an unusually large jump in purchases of put options on the stocks of UAL Corp. and AMR Corp. in the three business days before the attack on major options exchanges in the United States. On one day, UAL put option purchases were 25 times greater than the year-to-date average. In the month before the attacks, short sales jumped by 40 percent for UAL and 20 percent for American.
1838***
1839Spokesmen for British securities regulators and the AXA Group also confirmed yesterday that investigations are continuing.
1840The source familiar with the United trades identified Deutsche Banc Alex. Brown, the American investment banking arm of German giant Deutsche Bank, as the investment bank used to purchase at least some of the options.
1841***
1842Last weekend, German central bank president Ernst Welteke said a study pointed to “terrorism insider trading” in those stocks.
1843The Chronicle illustrated the story with the following chart:
1844 
1845On October 19, 2001, the Chronicle wrote:
1846On Oct. 2, Canadian securities officials confirmed that the SEC privately had asked North American investment firms to review their records for evidence of trading activity in the shares of 38 companies, suggesting that some buyers and sellers might have had advance knowledge of the attacks.
1847***FMR Corp. spokeswoman Anne Crowley, said her firm — which owns the giant Fidelity family of mutual funds in Boston — has already provided “account and transaction” information to investigators, and had no objection to the new procedures announced yesterday. Crowley declined to describe the nature of the information previously shared with the government.
1848So the effort to track down the source of the puts was certainly quite substantial.
1849What were the results and details of the investigation?
1850Apparently, we’ll never know.
1851Specifically, David Callahan – executive editor of SmartCEO – submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to the SEC regarding the pre-9/11 put options.
1852The SEC responded:
1853This letter is in response to your request seeking access to and copies of the documentary evidence referred to in footnote 130 of Chapter 5 of the September 11 (9/11) Commission Report.
1854***
1855We have been advised that the potentially responsive records have been destroyed.
1856If the SEC had responded by producing documents showing that the pre-9/11 put options had an innocent explanation (such as a hedge made by a smaller airline), that would be understandable.
1857If the SEC had responded by saying that the documents were classified as somehow protecting proprietary financial information, I wouldn’t like it, but I would at least understand the argument.
1858But destroyed? Why? (See Afterword for additional details.)
1859Not the First Time
1860This is not the first destruction of documentary evidence related to 9/11.
1861I wrotein March:
1862As I pointed out in 2007:
1863The 9/11 Commission Report was largely based on a third-hand account of what tortured detainees said, with two of the three parties in the communication being government employees.
1864The official 9/11 Commission Report states:
1865Chapters 5 and 7 rely heavily on information obtained from captured al Qaeda members. A number of these “detainees” have firsthand knowledge of the 9/11 plot. Assessing the truth of statements by these witnesses-sworn enemies of the United States-is challenging. Our access to them has been limited to the review of intelligence reports based on communications received from the locations where the actual interrogations take place. We submitted questions for use in the interrogations, but had no control over whether, when, or how questions of particular interest would be asked. Nor were we allowed to talk to the interrogators so that we could better judge the credibility of the detainees and clarify ambiguities in the reporting.
1866In other words, the 9/11 Commissioners were not allowed to speak with the detainees, or even their interrogators. Instead, they got their information third-hand.
1867The Commission didn’t really trust the interrogation testimony. For example, one of the primary architects of the 9/11 Commission Report, Ernest May, said in May 2005:
1868We never had full confidence in the interrogation reports as historical sources.
1869As I noted last May:
1870Newsweek is running an essay by [New York Times investigative reporter] Philip Shenon saying [that the 9/11 Commission Report was unreliable because most of the information was based on the statements of tortured detainees]:
1871The commission appears to have ignored obvious clues throughout 2003 and 2004 that its account of the 9/11 plot and Al Qaeda’s history relied heavily on information obtained from detainees who had been subjected to torture, or something not far from it.
1872The panel raised no public protest over the CIA’s interrogation methods, even though news reports at the time suggested how brutal those methods were. In fact, the commission demanded that the CIA carry out new rounds of interrogations in 2004 to get answers to its questions.
1873That has troubling implications for the credibility of the commission’s final report. In intelligence circles, testimony obtained through torture is typically discredited; research shows that people will say anything under threat of intense physical pain.
1874And yet it is a distinct possibility that Al Qaeda suspects who were the exclusive source of information for long passages of the commission’s report may have been subjected to “enhanced” interrogation techniques, or at least threatened with them, because of the 9/11 Commission….
1875Information from CIA interrogations of two of the three—KSM and Abu Zubaydah—is cited throughout two key chapters of the panel’s report focusing on the planning and execution of the attacks and on the history of Al Qaeda.
1876Footnotes in the panel’s report indicate when information was obtained from detainees interrogated by the CIA. An analysis by NBC News found that more than a quarter of the report’s footnotes—441 of some 1,700—referred to detainees who were subjected to the CIA’s “enhanced” interrogation program, including the trio who were waterboarded.
1877Commission members note that they repeatedly pressed the Bush White House and CIA for direct access to the detainees, but the administration refused. So the commission forwarded questions to the CIA, whose interrogators posed them on the panel’s behalf.
1878The commission’s report gave no hint that harsh interrogation methods were used in gathering information, stating that the panel had “no control” over how the CIA did its job; the authors also said they had attempted to corroborate the information “with documents and statements of others.”
1879But how could the commission corroborate information known only to a handful of people in a shadowy terrorist network, most of whom were either dead or still at large?
1880Former senator Bob Kerrey of Nebraska, a Democrat on the commission, told me last year he had long feared that the investigation depended too heavily on the accounts of Al Qaeda detainees who were physically coerced into talking ….
1881Kerrey said it might take “a permanent 9/11 commission” to end the remaining mysteries of September 11.
1882Abu Zubaida was well-known to the FBI as being literally crazy. The Washington Post quotes “FBI officials, including agents who questioned [alleged Al-Qaeda member Abu Zubaida] after his capture or reviewed documents seized from his home” as concluding that he was:
1883[L]argely a loudmouthed and mentally troubled hotelier whose credibility dropped as the CIA subjected him to a simulated drowning technique known as waterboarding and to other “enhanced interrogation” measures.
1884For example:
1885Retired FBI agent Daniel Coleman, who led an examination of documents after Abu Zubaida’s capture in early 2002 and worked on the case, said the CIA’s harsh tactics cast doubt on the credibility of Abu Zubaida’s information.
1886“I don’t have confidence in anything he says, because once you go down that road, everything you say is tainted,” Coleman said, referring to the harsh measures. “He was talking before they did that to him, but they didn’t believe him. The problem is they didn’t realize he didn’t know all that much.”
1887***
1888“They said, ‘You’ve got to be kidding me,’ ” said Coleman, recalling accounts from FBI employees who were there. ” ‘This guy’s a Muslim. That’s not going to win his confidence.Are you trying to get information out of him or just belittle him?'” Coleman helped lead the bureau’s efforts against Osama bin Laden for a decade, ending in 2004.
1889Coleman goes on to say:
1890Abu Zubaida … was a “safehouse keeper” with mental problems who claimed to know more about al-Qaeda and its inner workings than he really did.
1891***
1892Looking at other evidence, including a serious head injury that Abu Zubaida had suffered years earlier, Coleman and others at the FBI believed that he had severe mental problems that called his credibility into question. “They all knew he was crazy, and they knew he was always on the damn phone,” Coleman said, referring to al-Qaeda operatives. “You think they’re going to tell him anything?”
1893ACLU, FireDogLake’s Marcy Wheeler and RawStory broke the story yesterday that (quoting RawStory):
1894Senior Bush administration officials sternly cautioned the 9/11 Commission against probing too deeply into the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, according to a document recently obtained by the ACLU.
1895The notification came in a letter dated January 6, 2004, addressed by Attorney General John Ashcroft, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and CIA Director George J. Tenet. The ACLU described it as a fax sent by David Addington, then-counsel to former vice president Dick Cheney.
1896In the message, the officials denied the bipartisan commission’s request to question terrorist detainees, informing its two senior-most members that doing so would “cross” a “line” and obstruct the administration’s ability to protect the nation.
1897“In response to the Commission’s expansive requests for access to secrets, the executive branch has provided such access in full cooperation,” the letter read. “There is, however, a line that the Commission should not cross — the line separating the Commission’s proper inquiry into the September 11, 2001 attacks from interference with the Government’s ability to safeguard the national security, including protection of Americans from future terrorist attacks.”
1898***
1899“The Commission staff’s proposed participation in questioning of detainees would cross that line,” the letter continued. “As the officers of the United States responsible for the law enforcement, defense and intelligence functions of the Government, we urge your Commission not to further pursue the proposed request to participate in the questioning of detainees.”
1900Destruction of Evidence
1901The interrogators made videotapes of the interrogations. The 9/11 Commission asked for all tapes, but the CIA lied and said there weren’t any.
1902The CIA then destroyed the tapes.
1903Specifically, the New York Times confirms that the government swore that it had turned over all of the relevant material regarding the statements of the people being interrogated:
1904“The commission did formally request material of this kind from all relevant agencies, and the commission was assured that we had received all the material responsive to our request,” said Philip D. Zelikow, who served as executive director of the Sept. 11 commission ….
1905“No tapes were acknowledged or turned over, nor was the commission provided with any transcript prepared from recordings,” he said.
1906But is the destruction of the tapes — and hiding from the 9/11 Commission the fact that the tapes existed — a big deal? Yes, actually. As the Times goes on to state:
1907Daniel Marcus, a law professor at American University who served as general counsel for the Sept. 11 commissionand was involved in the discussions about interviews with Al Qaeda leaders, said he had heard nothing about any tapes being destroyed.If tapes were destroyed, he said, “it’s a big deal, it’s a very big deal,” because it could amount to obstruction of justice to withhold evidence being sought in criminal or fact-finding investigations.
1908Indeed, 9/11 Commission co-chairs Thomas Keane and Lee Hamilton wrote:
1909Those who knew about those videotapes — and did not tell us about them — obstructed our investigation.
1910The CIA also is refusing to release any transcripts from the interrogation sessions. As I wrote a year ago:
1911What does the fact that the CIA destroyed numerous videotapes of Guantanamo interrogations, but has 3,000 pages of transcripts from those tapes really mean?
1912Initially, it means that CIA’s claim that it destroyed the video tapes to protect the interrogators’ identity is false. Why? Well, the transcripts contain the identity of the interrogator. And the CIA is refusing to produce the transcripts.
1913Obviously, the CIA could have “blurred” the face of the interrogator and shifted his voice (like you’ve seen on investigative tv shows like 60 Minutes) to protect the interrogator’s identity. And since the CIA is not releasing the transcripts, it similarly could have refused to release the videos.
1914The fact that the CIA instead destroyed the videos shows that it has something to hide.
1915Trying to Create a False Linkage?
1916I have repeatedly pointed out that the top interrogation experts say that torture doesn’t work.
1917As I wrotelast May:
1918The fact that people were tortured in order to justify the Iraq war by making a false linkage between Iraq and 9/11 is gaining attention.
1919Many people are starting to understand that top Bush administration officials not only knowingly lied about a non-existent connection between Al Qaida and Iraq, but they pushed and insisted that interrogators use special torture methods aimed at extracting false confessions to attempt to create such a false linkage.
1920Indeed, the Senate Armed Services Committee found that the U.S. used torture techniques specifically aimed at extracting false confessions (and see this).
1921And as Paul Krugman wrote in the New York Times:
1922Let’s say this slowly: the Bush administration wanted to use 9/11 as a pretext to invade Iraq, even though Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. So it tortured people to make them confess to the nonexistent link.
1923[A]ccording to NBC news:
1924	Much of the 9/11 Commission Report was based upon the testimony of people who were tortured
1925	At least four of the people whose interrogation figured in the 9/11 Commission Report have claimed that they told interrogators information as a way to stop being “tortured.”
1926	One of the Commission’s main sources of information was tortured until he agreed to sign a confession that he was NOT EVEN ALLOWED TO READ
1927	The 9/11 Commission itself doubted the accuracy of the torture confessions, and yet kept their doubts to themselves
1928In fact, the self-confessed “mastermind” of 9/11 also confessed to crimes which he could not have committed. He later said that he gave the interrogators a lot of false information – telling them what he thought they wanted to hear – in an attempt to stop the torture. We also know that he was heavily tortured specifically for the purpose of trying to obtain false information about 9/11 – specifically, that Iraq had something to do with it.
1929***
1930Remember, as discussed above, the torture techniques used by the Bush administration to try to link Iraq and 9/11 were specifically geared towards creating false confessions (they were techniques created by the communists to be used in show trials).
1931***
1932The above-linked NBC news report quotes a couple of legal experts to this effect:
1933Michael Ratner, president of the Center for Constitutional Rights, says he is “shocked” that the Commission never asked about extreme interrogation measures.
1934“If you’re sitting at the 9/11 Commission, with all the high-powered lawyers on the Commission and on the staff, first you ask what happened rather than guess,” said Ratner, whose center represents detainees at Guantanamo. “Most people look at the 9/11 Commission Report as a trusted historical document. If their conclusions were supported by information gained from torture, therefore their conclusions are suspect.“…
1935Karen Greenberg, director of the Center for Law and Security at New York University’s School of Law, put it this way: “[I]t should have relied on sources not tainted. It calls into question how we were willing to use these interrogations to construct the narrative.”
1936The interrogations were “used” to “construct the narrative” which the 9/11 Commission decided to use.
1937Remember (as explored in the book The Commission by respected journalist Philip Shenon), that the Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission was an administration insider whose area of expertise is the creation and maintenance of “public myths” thought to be true, even if not actually true. He wrote an outline of what he wanted the report to say very early in the process, controlled what the Commission did and did not analyze, then limited the scope of the Commission’s inquiry so that the overwhelming majority of questions about 9/11 remained unasked (see this article and this article).
1938***
1939As constitutional law expert Jonathan Turley stated:
1940[The 9/11 Commission] was a commission that was really made for Washington – a commission composed of political appointees of both parties that ran interference for those parties – a commission that insisted at the beginning it would not impose blame on individuals.
1941Other Obstructions of Justice
1942[Other examples of obstructions of justice include the following:]
1943	The chairs of both the 9/11 Commission and the Joint Inquiry of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees into 9/11 said that government “minders” obstructed the investigation into 9/11 by intimidating witnesses
1944	The 9/11 Commissioners concluded that officials from the Pentagon lied to the Commission, and considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements
1945	The tape of interviews of air traffic controllers on-duty on 9/11 was intentionally destroyed by crushing the cassette by hand, cutting the tape into little pieces, and then dropping the pieces in different trash cans around the building as shown by this NY Times article (summary version is free; full version is pay-per-view) and by this article from the Chicago Sun-Times
1946	Investigators for the Congressional Joint Inquiry discovered that an FBI informant had hosted and even rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House. As the New York Times notes:
1947
1948Senator Bob Graham, the Florida Democrat who is a former chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, accused the White House on Tuesday of covering up evidence . . .* * *
1949The accusation stems from the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s refusal to allow investigators for a Congressional inquiry and the independent Sept. 11 commission to interview an informant, Abdussattar Shaikh, who had been the landlord in San Diego of two Sept. 11 hijackers.
1950In his book “Intelligence Matters,” Mr. Graham, the co-chairman of the Congressional inquiry with Representative Porter J. Goss, Republican of Florida, said an F.B.I. official wrote them in November 2002 and said “the administration would not sanction a staff interview with the source.” On Tuesday, Mr. Graham called the letter “a smoking gun” and said, “The reason for this cover-up goes right to the White House.”
1951We don’t need to even discuss conspiracy theories about what happened on 9/11 to be incredibly disturbed about what happened after: the government’s obstructions of justice.
1952Indeed, the 9/11 Commissioners themselvesare disturbed:
1953	The Commission’s co-chairs said that the CIA (and likely the White House) “obstructed our investigation”
1954	9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that “There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn’t have access . . . .”
1955	9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said “We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting”
1956	9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: “It is a national scandal”;“This investigation is now compromised”; and “One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up”
1957	The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) – who led the 9/11 staff’s inquiry – said“At some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened“. He also said “I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years…. This is not spin. This is not true.”
1958Afterword: Footnote 130 to chapter 5 of the official 9/11 Commission Report states:
1959Highly publicized allegations of insider trading in advance of 9/11 generally rest on reports of unusual pre-9/11 trading activity in companies whose stock plummeted after the attacks. Some unusual trading did in fact occur, but each such trade proved to have an innocuous explanation. For example, the volume of put options- investments that pay off only when a stock drops in price-surged in the parent companies of United Airlines on September 6 and American Airlines on September 10-highly suspicious trading on its face. Yet, further investigation has revealed that the trading had no connection with 9/11. A single U.S.-based institutional investor with no conceivable ties to al Qaeda purchased 95 percent of the UAL puts on September 6 as part of a trading strategy that also included buying 115,000 shares of American on September 10. Similarly, much of the seemingly suspicious trading in American on September 10 was traced to a specific U.S.-based options trading newsletter, faxed to its subscribers on Sunday, September 9, which recommended these trades. These examples typify the evidence examined by the investigation. The SEC and the FBI, aided by other agencies and the securities industry, devoted enormous resources to investigating this issue, including securing the cooperation of many foreign governments. These investigators have found that the apparently suspicious consistently proved innocuous. Joseph Cella interview (Sept. 16, 2003; May 7, 2004; May 10-11, 2004); FBI briefing (Aug. 15, 2003); SEC memo, Division of Enforcement to SEC Chair and Commissioners, “Pre-September 11, 2001 Trading Review,” May 15, 2002; Ken Breen interview (Apr. 23, 2004); Ed G. interview (Feb. 3, 2004).
1960Did the Commission have full access to information regarding put options? Was the Commission misled, as it was on other issues? Was evidence destroyed or fabricated? We will never know, as the underlying documents have – according to the SEC – been destroyed.
1961http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/06/sec-government-destroyed-documents-regarding-pre-911-put-options.html
1962
1963Second Avenue (Manhattan)
1964From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1965For other uses, see Second Avenue (disambiguation).
1966Route map: Bing / Google 
1967Second Avenue
1968 
1969Second Avenue in 2007
1970Owner	City of New York
1971
1972Maintained by	NYCDOT
1973
1974Length	6.4 mi[1] (10.3 km)
1975
1976Location	Manhattan, New York City
1977
1978South end	Houston / Chrystie Streets in Lower East Side
1979
1980Major
1981junctions	  NY 25 (Queensboro Bridge) inEast Midtown
1982RFK Bridge in East Harlem
1983
1984North end	  Harlem River Drive / 128th Street in East Harlem
1985East	First Avenue
1986
1987West	Third Avenue
1988
1989Construction
1990Commissioned	March 1811
1991
1992Second Avenue is an avenue on the East Side of the New York City borough of Manhattan extending from Houston Street at its south end to the Harlem River Drive at 128th Street at its north end. A one-way street, vehicular traffic on Second Avenue runs southbound (downtown) only, except for a one-block segment of the avenue in Harlem. South of Houston Street, the roadway continues as Chrystie Street south to Canal Street. A bicycle lane in the left hand portion from 55th to 34th Street closes a gap in the Manhattan Waterfront Greenway. The bike lane extends from 125th Street all the way down to Houston Street. Second Avenue passes through a number of Manhattan neighborhoods including (from south to north) the Lower East Side, East Village, Gramercy Park, Murray Hill, Upper East Side,Yorkville and Spanish Harlem.
1993Contents
1994  [hide] 
1995•	1History
1996o	1.12015 gas explosion
1997•	2Transportation
1998•	3References
1999•	4External links
2000History[edit]
2001 
2002Second Avenue facing north from 42nd Street in 1861
2003Downtown Second Avenue in the Lower East Side was the home to manyYiddish theatre productions during the early part of the 20th century, and Second Avenue came to be known as the "Yiddish Theater District", "Yiddish Broadway", or the "Jewish Rialto". Although the theaters are gone, many traces of Jewish immigrant culture remain, such as kosherdelicatessens and bakeries, and the famous Second Avenue Deli (which closed in 2006, later reopening on East 33rd Street and Third Avenue).
2004The Second Avenue Elevated train line ran above Second Avenue the full length of the avenue north of 23rd Street, and stood from 1880 until service was ended on June 13, 1942. South of Second Avenue, it ran on First Avenue and then Allen and Division Street.[2] The elevated trains were noisy and often dirty (in the 19th century they were pulled by soot-spewing steam locomotives). This depressed land values along Second Avenue during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Partially because of the presence of the El, most buildings constructed during this era were working class tenements. The line was finally torn down in 1942 because it was deteriorated and obsolete, and the cost of World War II made upkeep impossible.[3] Second Avenue maintains its modest architectural character today, despite running through a number of high income areas.
2005Second Avenue has carried one-way traffic since June 4, 1951, before which it carried traffic in both the northbound and southbound directions.[4]
20062015 gas explosion[edit]
2007Main article: 2015 East Village gas explosion
2008On March 26, 2015, a gas explosion and resulting fire in the East Village destroyed three buildings at 119, 121 and 123 Second Avenue, between East 7th Street and St. Marks Place. At least twenty-two people were injured, four critically, and two people were initially listed as missing.[5] Later, two men were found dead in the debris of the explosion and are confirmed to be the ones listed as missing.[6][7]
2009In August 2014, a Consolidated Edison meter reader discovered that someone had illegally tapped into the 1.5-inch gas line which serviced the restaurant at 121 Second Avenue, the only part of the building authorized to received gas service from Con Ed. The illegal taps were serving some of the apartments in the building. Con Ed turned off the gas to the building for 10 days until the taps were removed and the plumber who did the work certified to the city's Building Department that it had been completed. Neither the Building Department no Con Ed was required by law to verify that the work had been done.[8]
2010In the days before the explosion, work was ongoing in the building for the installation of a new 4-inch gas line to service the apartments in 121. Con Ed workers inspected the installation just an hour before the explosion, but did not pass it, for reasons not related to safety. There was no gas running through the new line. Shortly after, the owner of the restaurant smelled gas and called the landlord of the building, but did not call 911 or Con Ed. When the contractor in charge of the work being done and the landlord's son opened the basement door, the explosion took place.[8]
2011Eleven other buildings were evacuated as a result of the explosion, and Con Ed turned off the gas to the area. Several days later, some residents were allowed to return to some of the vacated buildings.[8]
2012Transportation[edit]
2013Bus service:
2014The M15 local serves the entirety of Second Avenue. The M15 Select Bus Service, the Select Bus Service equivalent of the local M15 bus, provides bus rapid transit service along Second Avenue southbound. Additionally, the M34A Select Bus Service runs along Second Avenue between East 34th Street and East 23rd Street en route to Waterside Plaza.[9]
2015Subway:
2016A Second Avenue Subway line has been planned since 1919,[10] with provisions to construct it as early as 1929.[11] A subway line under Second Avenue would relieve congestion on the IRT Lexington Avenue Line (4 5 6 <6> trains), the busiest rapid transit line in the United States, and currently the only line running up the Upper East Side of Manhattan.[12] Two short sections of the line have been completed over the years, serving other subway services (the Grand Street station is served by the B D trains), and others simply sitting vacant underground (such as the unused upper level at the Second Avenue station on the F trains). Portions have been leased from time to time by New York Telephone to house equipment serving the company's principal north-south communication lines which run under the Avenue.[13] Isolated 1970s-era segments of the line, built without any infrastructure, exist between Pell and Canal Streets, and between 99th–105th and 110th–120th Streets.[14] Construction was begun again on April 12, 2007, on Phase 1 of a subway line that will eventually extend from 125th Street to the Financial District via the T service. Phase 1 connects the currently unused BMT 63rd Street Line with the new line north to stations at 72nd, 86th, and 96th Streets, serving the Q trains. When the whole Second Avenue subway line is completed, which MTA Capital Construction President Dr. Michael Horodniceanu says may be as early as 2029,[15] it is projected to serve about 560,000 daily riders.[16]
2017Other:
2018There are bike lanes along the avenue south of 125th Street.[17][18]
2019References[edit]
2020Notes
20211.	Jump up^ Google (September 1, 2015). "Second Avenue (Manhattan)" (Map). Google Maps. Google. Retrieved September 1, 2015.
20222.	Jump up^ "Second Avenue 'El' Coming to a Stop", The Christian Science Monitor, June 13, 1942. Accessed October 12, 2008.
20233.	Jump up^ "Second Avenue Subway: Route 132-C". www.nycsubway.org. Retrieved 2014-06-05.
20244.	Jump up^ Ingraham, Joseph (5 June 1951). "Autos Speeded 15% on 1st And 2nd Aves". The New York Times. Retrieved 28 August 2012.
20255.	Jump up^ Flegenheimer, Matt and Surico, John "Two Men Remain Missing as Remnants of Explosion Are Scoured in Manhattan" The New York Times (March 28, 2015)
20266.	Jump up^ Barr, Meghan. "Official: 2 found dead in rubble believed to be missing men", Yahoo! News (March 30, 2015)
20277.	Jump up^ Dolan, Jim (April 3, 2015). "Crews Reach Basement In Manhattan Building Explosion Clean-up". WABC-TV. Retrieved 2015-04-04.
20288.	^ Jump up to:a b c Sandoval, Edgar and Smith, Greg B. "City probing whether East Village building owner illegally tapped into gas main as family mourns Nicholas Figueroa" New York Daily News (March 31, 2015)
20299.	Jump up^ http://web.mta.info/nyct/maps/manbus.pdf
203010.	Jump up^ Staff. "Second Avenue 'El' Coming to a Stop", The Christian Science Monitor, June 13, 1942. Accessed October 12, 2008.
203111.	Jump up^ 100 Miles of Subway in New City Project; 52 of them in Queens, New York Times September 16, 1929 page 1
203212.	Jump up^ "Second Avenue Subway in the Borough of Manhattan, New York County, New York Final Environmental Impact Statement And Final Section 4(f) and Section 6(f) Evaluation" (PDF). April 2004. pp. 1–5, 1–6. Retrieved September 22, 2011.
203313.	Jump up^ "Second Avenue Subway: Route 132-C". www.nycsubway.org. Retrieved 2014-06-05.
203414.	Jump up^ "The Line That Time Forgot – Second Avenue Subway". Nymag.com. April 5, 2004. Retrieved April 10, 2014.
203515.	Jump up^ Nolan, Caitlin (May 16, 2014). "Second Avenue subway line construction is progressing: officials". NY Daily News. Retrieved May 19, 2014.
203616.	Jump up^ Smith, Stephen J. (2013-10-02). "The Next 20 Years for New York’s MTA – Next City". Nextcity.org. Retrieved 2014-06-05.
203717.	Jump up^ "Manhattan Bike Map: Manhattan Bike Paths, Bike Lanes & Greenways". NYC Bike Maps. Retrieved 2014-06-05.
203818.	Jump up^ Miller, Stephen (2013-09-17). "DOT Proposes Filling the Gap in Second Avenue Protected Bike Lane | Streetsblog New York City". Streetsblog.org. Retrieved 2014-06-05.
2039External links[edit]
2040 	Wikimedia Commons has media related to 2nd Avenue (Manhattan).
2041
2042•	New York Songlines: Second Avenue, a virtual walking tour
2043https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Avenue_(Manhattan)
2044
2045Too Classified to Publish: Bush Nuclear Piracy Exposed
2046By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor on May 20, 2014
2047 
20489/11 Test
2049Russia Opens Files on Nuclear 9/11 and Israeli Proliferation
2050—
2051…by  Gordon Duff, Senior Editor
2052—
2053The report below is taken from an intelligence dump by Russian sources.  As the origin is from an intelligence agency in the form of a “leak,” there are always questions.  Thus far, we have found not only is the majority of the material confirmed but several solutions to serious problems involving 9/11 are included.
2054I have redacted little here.  However, this arrived with vast supporting documentation which can, in the future, be uploaded on SCRIBD for access. One key area is that the US had supplied Israel with surplus nuclear weapons. (Editor’s note:  We are advised that some of the documentation can never be uploaded or distributed for reasons that will be obvious.)
2055We have a very solid confirmation on this.  Back during the 1980s, Israel showed her inventory of Davy Crockett tactical nuclear warheads to one of our editors, who at the time was a senior NATO intelligence official.  These early “micro-nukes” were taken out of US inventory in 1978 and “disappeared.”
2056 
2057Nuclear “Test”
2058This highly classified report is being published unaltered except for bad machine translation errors being repaired.  My personal opinion is that this is NOT a disinformation piece but rather represents a significant breakthrough.  I believe that this is a rare glimpse behind the curtain.
2059I am publishing this for the use of those qualified to understand how little of this is really new.  Those things that are new are groundbreaking.  For those who find this all a bit over their heads, there is little I can do other than to let you know that this is the world “your elders” really live in and that you finally have a chance to look in mom and dads top dresser drawer.
2060______________________________________
2061 
2062The Dave Crockett
2063Too Classified to Publish
2064 
2065 
2066W48 – 155mm
2067According to a retired FXX agent specializing in Israeli counter intel: The type of nuclear devices used on 911 were a modified version of the W-54 nuclear artillery shells that were covertly provided to the Israelis between 1988 and 1998 from US surplus stockpiles illegally exported during the Bush/Clinton era.
2068Chemical analysis done by DOE Sandi was able to identify the chemical/radiation footprint or fingerprint of the warheads based on samples taken after 911 of the fallout at ground zero. (Editor’s note: Nuclear weapon use at ground zero is confirmed from multiple sources)
2069All plutonium based warheads have a chemical fingerprint that can identify the type of design and where the PU was made and how old it is. This was the 911 blackmail on Bush 1 and 2, the illegal transfer of surplus US nuclear weapons to the Israelis and why the continued cover up, along with the stolen gold and stock fraud that was going on Wall Street etc. According to file ENW57.pdf on page 66. (Editor’s note: Document received and confirmed)
2070Only a 2 kiloton device was needed to drop the buildings. A 2 kiloton device will produce a fireball of apx 150 to 200 feet in diameter at over 4000 degrees Centigrade. Just large enough to melt the I beams of the central core of the building and drop them in place. The light flash would last less than 1 second and primarily be in the UV light range. Overpressure would only be at 60PSI max and directed upwards with the blast. See underground effect.
2071Fallout would be minimal and located to within ground zero range only. Radiation would drop to acceptable levels within 72 hrs. after the blast. Most fall out was trapped in the cement dust thus causing all of the recent cancer deaths that we are now seeing in NYC amongst first responders. (Editor’s note: Consistent with site data)
2072 
2073High FluxIsotope Reactor Core – Cross Section
2074Melted steel and iron oxide or “nano thermite” is a byproduct of the very high gamma ray / Neutron flux induced into the central steel core. The radiation dissolves the steel into iron oxide consuming the carbon and silicone in the steel.
2075This explains the missing steel columns and the very important clue of the “vaporized’ 20 ton antenna tower atop the south tower. The upward blast of radiation literally vaporized it. Video evidence proves this to be true. (Editor’s note: Tower issue a vital one.)
2076The total XXOO data file from DOE Sandia on the 911 event is well over 72 MB. P.S. Snowden didn’t have a Q clearance so he missed this one. Carnaberry had a pretty good stash of documents on the subject. (All under the transit stuff.) The entire nuclear nonproliferation story of stolen nuclear material coming from Russia was an Israeli cover story to hide the original source of weapons material coming from the US stock piles. (Editor’s note: Fully confirmed)
2077Illegal distribution of US nuclear material to foreign allies was not limited to Israel. Virtually all NATO allies were in on this scam too. Dick Cheney was the bad guy on this one. Bush2/Cheney traded nuclear pits to foreign country as IOU’s in order to get what they wanted. Tom Countryman a well-known Israeli operative is curiously now in charge of N.N.P. at the State Department under Obama.(?) He was put there by Ram Emanuel.
2078 
2079Early Israeli core model – Vannunu photo
2080It appears that the weapon of choice for the Israelis were the W-54 and follow on series of nuclear pits taken from the Amarillo TX storage dump. This was what Carnaberry was working on for Bush senior in Houston.
2081A total of over 350 pits were transferred to the Israelis over a 10 to 20 year period of time. The W-54 type of pit design were the most desirable due to the 2 point implosion pit design. This is the easiest to re manufacture and modify as compared to other circular pit designs.
2082The pill shaped design of the W-54 type weapon contains over 1.5 times more plutonium than a standard pit. This would allow enough Plutonium to be recovered that was still of weapons grade use even after 32 plus years of age. Americium build up in the pit over time eventually makes the Pit unusable as a weapon so they have a limited shelf life based on how fast or slow the Plutonium was produce in the reactor at Stanford.
2083Usually it was about 150 days max. Irradiation time in the reactor during production determines the shelf life of the pit as weapons grade material. All of the micro nukes used by the Israelis are re-manufactured W-54 type series devices.
2084 
2085Khazelov confirmed this a micro nuke bombing
2086These devices were used in the Bali bombing and the London bombing and in Japan on their reactors. (Editor’s note: Nuclear weapon use in Bali confirmed) Also used in Damascus, Iraq and Afghanistan by the US. (Editor’s note: Multiple confirmation including site samples.)
2087These are stored in most Israelite embassies for ease of deployment. The one’s used on 911 were kept at the Israeli consulate in NYC until put in place. After 911 the FBI now checks all diplomatic pouches with a Geiger counter before entering or leaving the US. The South African weapons were also surplus W-54 artillery shells acquired from Israeli and final assembly and testing was done in South Africa with Israel assistance. (Editor’s note: This explains Pelendaba production issues.)
2088This was done because the Israelis needed a testing ground in order to make sure that there rebuilt weapons would work as designed. (Editor’s note: Testing on Sept. 22, 1979 multiple confirmations.) The North Korean weapons are also of the 155 mm artillery design as provided by Israel.
2089The true North Korean nuclear weapons program is based on nuclear artillery use and not missiles. The plan is to use a massive artillery barge on South Korea if war breaks out this include the use of small nuclear artillery shells to counter US tanks rockets and artillery.
2090The Saudi’s also have a stash of W-54’s acquired from the US under Bush2. (Editor’s note: Confirmed) The Israelis have also provided them to India, Brazil, China, Taiwan, Japan, North and South Korea etc. (Editor’s note: All but South Korea confirmed. Canada had been believed to be the source of Brazilian nuclear weapons.) Dimona is a standard 75 megawatt thermal open top reactor as used in France for their plutonium weapons production program, their version of Stanford (Editor’s note:  Probably “Hanford”).
2091 
2092Dimona – Israel
2093Due to over use as a fast breeder reactor by the Israelis, Dimona suffered a “steam explosion” IE a flash over indecent due to neutron criticality back in the late 1980’s under Bush 1. This shut down its operation for many years until repairs could be made.
2094It know only operates at very low power levels due to neutron absorption damage to the containment vessel. Now mainly use for isotope production. This forced the Israelis to turn to stolen nuclear stock piles from the US for the continuation of their nuclear program.
2095The Israelis knowing that the nuclear material that they had acquire only had a limited shelf life left before it was no longer usable as weapons grade then tried to dump it on the surplus market as fast as possible before it was of no use to them. So they dumped it on unsuspecting nations who would only sit on it and not be able to test it. These were the fissile tests in North Korea. (Editor’s note: Confirmed, multiple sources)
2096When everybody caught on to the scam such as Japan and Korea. (IE the Korean sub sinkings etc) they were angry because they paid big bucks for junk. This started a mini cold war with Israel and her old clients. However with micro nukes even as the plutonium ages it will still fissile producing a smaller size detonation well under 2 kiloton in size.
2097So they can still be used as small dirty bombs or as very small tactical nukes such as the nuclear artillery strikes on Damascus with rocket assisted W-54’s. (Editor’s note: Confirmed strike, May 4, 2013) On the W-54 pit design it is pill shaped and it is only about 4 inches in diameter and weighs about 24 pounds.
2098Most of the fuel is consumed in the plasma fire ball when detonated so there is very little plutonium fallout left to escape. If it is salted with other materials the fallout can be even reduced to lower levels such as in an enhanced radiation device or the so called neutron bomb. This is what was used on 911.
2099 
2100Falling man – 911
2101The primary purpose of the nuclear weapon used on 911 was to produce a massive Gama ray / neutron flux that would vaporize about 150 to 300 feet of 6 inch thick steal I beams that constituted the central core of the WTC buildings. This created a free fall event as seen on TV that day. (Editor’s note: Critical information here.)
2102The flash would be hidden from sight due to the underground detonation. Most of the light was in the non-visible light spectrum any way. Over pressure would be reduced to 6 psi due to the blast traveling up the central core and neutron radiation vaporizing the TV antenna at the top of the building as see on TV.
2103The fallout would be mainly vaporized concrete cement and iron oxide. This is why after 911 they told everyone on TV that the beta radiation burns that people were getting were due to the caustic cement dust and not due to the radiation effects from the radioactive cement fallout. (Editor’s note: Fully confirmed)
2104The iron oxide found all over the place was what was left of the steel I beams. This was the so called Nano Thermite that was found everywhere. Fallout was limited to a 1 mile area around down town NYC. See charts. (Editor’s note: Received)
2105Radiation decay was reduced to safe low levels after 72 hrs., (Editor’s note: Fully confirmed) outside of ground zero its self. This is why the area was blocked off from the public for 3 days after the event, in order to let the radiation drop to safe levels
2106Editing:  Jim W. Dean
2107http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/05/20/too-classified-to-publish-bush-nuclear-piracy-exposed/
2108
210943 Comments
2110Sort by 
2111Oldest
2112 
2113 
2114 
2115Oleg Finodeyev
2116There are extremely strong accusations. Without any supporting documents it would be difficult to establish confidence about it.
2117Besides, Russian intelligence service has no more decency in common sense than CIA - they play by the same rules. What ever they "leak" doesn't mean it is true.
2118There were many statements about controlled explosions, etc. What about those?
2119Like · Reply · May 20, 2014 11:42am
2120 
2121Gordon Duff · 
2122London, United Kingdom
2123You shouild have had years to view supporting documents. We are not a free library.
2124If you were a 9/11 follower, which I may be wrongly assuming, you would have Prager and Khalezov's work, Fetzers, Barretts, so many others.
2125Like · Reply ·  16 · May 20, 2014 12:20pm
2126 
2127Michael Butler · 
2128Rancho Santa Margarita, California
2129Oleg, I happen to live in Rancho Santa Margarita as well. Feel free to send me a friend request. Maybe we can meet up and compare notes...I've followed all of the gory details.
2130Like · Reply ·  1 · May 20, 2014 1:22pm
2131 
2132Oleg Finodeyev
2133Michael Butler 
2134Michael hi:
2135I was living there until 2009. When crisis hit me hard I had to move all around country. Now I'm in Florida. But thank you very much for invitation. I wish you best.
2136
2137Oleg
2138Like · Reply ·  1 · May 20, 2014 5:21pm
2139Show 3 more replies in this thread
2140 
2141Philip Dennany · 
2142St. Philip's High School, Dinajpur
2143There were several different methods of destruction used in taking down the WTC, not only to insure their take down, but to confuse and complicate solving what really happened as well as who was really responsible. The only thing I can figure out for sure is that the al-Qaeda and bin Laden had absolutely nothing to do with it except as being the intended patsies.
2144Like · Reply ·  41 · May 20, 2014 12:44pm
2145 
2146Michael Joseph Casey · 
2147United States Truck Driving School
2148Intended Pastie...just not the same is itt then?
2149Like · Reply · May 21, 2014 12:56pm
2150 
2151Robert Brooks · 
2152Rocket Scientist at NASA/JSC
2153You are 100% correct.
2154Like · Reply ·  1 · May 24, 2014 3:43am
2155 
2156Deborah Plue · 
2157Southern Vermont College/ Career Development
2158Thanks Gordon Details come out and we learn a lot. Look for more in the future.
2159Like · Reply ·  2 · May 20, 2014 1:55pm
2160 
2161Gordon Duff · 
2162London, United Kingdom
2163This is the first real break we have had with 9/11...where an intelligence agency has laid it all out and named names.
2164Like · Reply ·  10 · May 20, 2014 7:21pm
2165 
2166Gail Lyn · 
2167SCNM
2168Gordon Duff Wow great article...finally some hard hitting stuff and confirmed...when they gonna round em up and take em to the pokey where they belong? Just sayin...anyone else would have been there already for sure with no mercy. How can they live with themselves?? No conscience sociopaths geez its sickening and pathetic. Thanks for getting more truth out there!
2169Like · Reply ·  4 · May 21, 2014 12:27am
2170 
2171Allen L Roland · 
2172Heart Centered Consultant at Self-Employed
2173Great article, Gordon ~ more relevant cannon fodder to eventually bring Cheney and Bush to Justice.
2174Like · Reply ·  12 · May 20, 2014 3:09pm
2175 
2176Howard Lewis · 
2177University of Washington
2178Where did you find this stuff???
2179So Bush41 as Ambassador to the United Nations signed off on the original basement nuke based demolition system as installed by the team of U.S./U.S.S.R. technicians AND Bush41 acted as the kunt who provided the access by which these mininukes were loaded in WTCs I and II (and elsewhere) to obtain a state-of-the-art demolition, for the same reasons and for the same established and planned results. Building 7 appears to have used the original preset. 7's design and structure was traditional post and beam, and therefore dropped like most other condemned buildi...See More
2180Like · Reply ·  7 · May 20, 2014 5:23pm
2181 
2182Russ Merritt · 
2183Various Colleges and Universities
2184Ah common just look at that picture a clear case of progressive collapse, where the " solid" upper portion's weight and mass crushes the structurally compromised lower sections.
2185Like · Reply · May 23, 2014 3:38pm
2186 
2187Howard Lewis · 
2188University of Washington
2189Russ Merritt , Yep. Only planned and carried out as genocide. Note the fact concerning the computerized progression with vertical load differential between the four corners being exceeded and then the preset activated to ensure a vertical collapse. 
2190Read carefully who signed off on this WTC set up and worked with the entity which was the prime mover in the WTCs' construction and concurrently, the prime force behind the cutting down of 100 feet of cliff to facilitate the construction of 4 Fukushima reactors built on the beach 15 feet above high tide in the middle of one of the most active tsu...See More
2191Like · Reply ·  2 · May 23, 2014 7:43pm
2192 
2193Randy Rogers · 
2194A Pest To Liers. at Anonymous
2195This explains you perfect!!....http://memegenerator.net/instance/9867313...
2196Like · Reply · May 30, 2014 10:50pm
2197Show 3 more replies in this thread
2198 
2199Glenn Lee Canady · 
2200Georgia Tech
2201Wow another HUGE article from VT that blows the doors off the Bush crime syndicate. Great job guys! Spread VT articles EVERYWHERE if you want to win! VT puts out the truth AND makes arrests and indictments while Benedict Arnold Alex Jones lies, censors and buys new Dodge Chargers with your money! Post VT articles all over Alex Jones articles to wake people up at what Jones hides and lies about for his Illuminati masters!
2202Like · Reply ·  23 · May 20, 2014 7:42pm
2203 
2204John B Lucas II · 
2205Brick Computer Science Institute
2206Really? Do you think it will bring down the government? Let's just hold our breath and wait for that to happen.
2207Like · Reply ·  2 · May 21, 2014 11:58pm
2208 
2209Glenn Lee Canady · 
2210Georgia Tech
2211John B Lucas II Did I say that? No! I said VT is the ONLY ones that have made arrests and indictments. They are the only ones naming names of the Illuminati families so you can either support the good guys - our Vets and patriots in US Intelligence or be a fool and support Alex Jones who lies, censors, runs from solutions and buys new Dodge Chargers with your money! I'll stick to the guys who have actually DONE something! I hope you will help also.
2212Like · Reply ·  8 · May 22, 2014 9:22am · Edited
2213 
2214Howard Lewis · 
2215University of Washington
2216John B Lucas II ., "protect against all enemies, foreign and domestic."
2217Like · Reply ·  1 · May 23, 2014 7:45pm
2218Show 8 more replies in this thread
2219 
2220John B Lucas II · 
2221Brick Computer Science Institute
2222This site has maxed out it's idiot rating.
2223Like · Reply ·  2 · May 20, 2014 10:14pm
2224 
2225Gordon Duff · 
2226London, United Kingdom
2227John, got that uniform in a box of cracker jacks?
2228Like · Reply ·  5 · May 21, 2014 4:01pm
2229 
2230John B Lucas II · 
2231Brick Computer Science Institute
2232Gordon Duff How did it feel? you know, when that last scrap of sanity left you?
2233Like · Reply · May 21, 2014 7:33pm
2234 
2235Davis-Guess Wendy · 
2236Albert Gallatin Area Senior High School
2237John B Lucas II Trading it all in to avoid an unpleasant scene? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhbRlhQgj_Y In the Dark (A tune by Billy Squier)
2238Like · Reply ·  2 · May 22, 2014 1:57am
2239Show 6 more replies in this thread
2240 
2241Sajal Liza · 
2242Ansan College
2243With this it is obvious why we are continuously failed in arms control and disarmament rather faced much nuclear proliferation. This is an irony for the whole world that US which speaks a lot about counter proliferation in apparent face but inherited a whole structure of nuclear piracy. This is an aspect which Snowden actually missed out as it is a mess of ages and ages. This is a question which never been thought off that how a disputed newly born state Israel has nuclear weapons and it becomes quite when things comes at their end. Israel neither accepts nor denies of its nukes but speaks very high against Iran. No body questions Israel, why, it’s because of US back. With all this, what is the need of speaking high words when US presidency itself involved in piracy.
2244Like · Reply · May 20, 2014 10:43pm
2245 
2246South Asian Voices
2247Israel’s involvement in the 9/11 attacks and the possibility that it might have been a false flag operation with the objective of laying the groundwork to attack Afghanistan, Iraq and other Muslim nations are among the most popular theories which the members of 9/11 Truth Movement have proposed. It all points to Israel. The American public needs to understand that the entire history of this State is rooted in racism, terror, racial genocide, theft, and False Flag Operations. Look at the King David Hotel Bombing in Jerusalem in 1947; Deir Yassin; the Lavon Affair; Israel’s deliberate attack on ...See More
2248Like · Reply ·  15 · May 20, 2014 11:41pm
2249 
2250Howard Lewis · 
2251University of Washington
2252Israel has no practical reason to blow up much outside of their direct neighbors. The City of London, their boss, is doomed as a world wide power unless the British royals, and others, can pay down their debt. Israel is the Brits' 'Jonestown mercenary farm'. Exploitation of the American sheeple along these lines is succeeding brilliantly through utilization of the American Associated Press and their American Council on Foreign Relations, which implements strategies using officials elected through the dissemination of propaganda by these U.S. media institutions owned by them during U.S. election campaigns. Israel thinks they run their show but follow orders.
2253Like · Reply ·  7 · May 21, 2014 6:31pm
2254 
2255Davis-Guess Wendy · 
2256Albert Gallatin Area Senior High School
2257Howard Lewis Take a look at the big picture
2258
2259.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TETtL- Agenda 21
2260Like · Reply ·  2 · May 22, 2014 1:49am
2261 
2262Howard Lewis · 
2263University of Washington
2264Davis-Guess Wendy , you must have annoyed Youtube. What is the title?
2265Like · Reply ·  2 · May 23, 2014 7:47pm
2266Show 4 more replies in this thread
2267 
2268Kamaya Chauhan · 
2269New Delhi, India
2270Good effort Gordon Duff... This article has revealed many things which the USA citizens and the world was not knowing about. I think bad time of USA has been started. Now people are coming out with facts. Where on one side USA voices much loud about global disarmament while on the other side it is actually the factor of all the destruction done and further waiting to be. It was the state who actually supported Israel for the procurement of its nuclear weapons program and now it is having issues regarding Iran's nuclear capability. This is actually the true face of Bush administration who has always been in mouthing big things but practically he did nothing except bringing the world at dangerous edge.
2271Like · Reply ·  2 · May 21, 2014 12:34am
2272 
2273Oleg Finodeyev
2274Gordon:
2275As I have stated earlier - it is nuclear" article and what ever I will be saying later is not an attempt to reduce its value.
2276Here are few questions I dare to ask you:
22771. If radioactive materials were caught in cement dust, in this case not only first respondents (who came after event) but many by-standers (who were at the moment of blast) should be affected. What are your thoughts about it?
22782. Dr. Steve Johns (I believe he is from the Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah) was making statements about demolition and diagonal cuts of the supporting I-beams. I may be mistaking - it was ...See More
2279Like · Reply · May 21, 2014 7:48am
2280 
2281Oleg Finodeyev
2282If to apply analytic view points used in criminal justice: motives, means and time to 911 it will became crystal clear who did it - so simple. How it was dome - just details...
2283Like · Reply · May 21, 2014 7:52am
2284 
2285Davis-Guess Wendy · 
2286Albert Gallatin Area Senior High School
2287Who benefited is all that is required to determine the perps. (Follow the money)
2288Like · Reply · May 21, 2014 2:42pm
2289 
2290Marc Pinke · 
2291The University of Western Ontario
2292No micro-nukes were used in the 9/11 demolition. The TNT yield equivalent would be too tiny to position them underground to create an upwards shockwave. 2.0 KT means 2,000,000 MILLION kgs of TNT which maps to less than a lousy 3.5 Richter which is required in order for humans to barely feel shelves shaking in the average US home. The Murrah building was ~2.0 KT in nuclear yield and managed to pulverize a lousy several floors at best but then again it was placed much closer to the Earth's surface and wasn't buried deep. In the case of each 400 million lb steel tower, we would need to position `...See More
2293Like · Reply ·  4 · May 22, 2014 10:09am · Edited
2294 
2295Gordon Duff · 
2296London, United Kingdom
2297Marc
2298Bad math. MT/KTwise. Mike Harris had come to me with the idea of a focused fission reaction years ago.
2299The Russians lay it out in the SCRIBD doc I posted.
2300Like · Reply ·  3 · May 21, 2014 4:00pm
2301 
2302Pat Davis
2303"Kiloton" means 1,000 tons, Two KT = 2,000 tons.
2304Like · Reply ·  1 · May 22, 2014 9:37am
2305 
2306Marc Pinke · 
2307The University of Western Ontario
2308Correct and furthermore 2,000 tons = 2,000 * 1,000 which equals 2,000,000 which is a MILLION smile emoticon like I wrote above. Now, keep in mind we are also talking metric so this means Kilograms and not Pounds. One place I noticed Bruce Campbell made this error was on his writings about the P-700 Shipwreck cruise missile where he stated that it was 7 tonnes and equated that to 7,000 lbs. In fact, the P-700 Shipwreck is measured in 7 metric tonnes which is 7,000 kg * 2.2 lbs to get 15,400 lbs. Yes, 7,000 kg is 15,400 lbs. I love Bruce Campbell's writings so I will let that small one by lol smile emoticon
2309Like · Reply · May 22, 2014 10:10am · Edited
2310Show 4 more replies in this thread
2311 
2312William Hickey · 
2313St. Joseph's Seminary, Mountain View CA
2314Disinfo to obscure our possession of directed energy weapons... and our possession of off-the-shelf energy packages you can't put a meter on. Follow the money. Shame on you, Marine.
2315Like · Reply · May 21, 2014 8:01am
2316 
2317Howard Lewis · 
2318University of Washington
2319Not.
2320Like · Reply · Jun 14, 2014 8:36pm
2321 
2322Joni Simonishvili · 
2323Moscow State University
2324Here's a nice companion piece
2325
2326http://original.antiwar.com/.../netanyahu-worked-inside.../
2327Like · Reply ·  1 · May 21, 2014 8:11am
2328 
2329Frederick Ustinov · 
2330Throw a piece of cat poop at Jonathan Gruber
2331That's a great University you got up there Joni- many years ago there was a also a place called Hoseapples there I used to frequent. (Mos-COE's in Idaho, Mos-COW's in Russia, or was it the other way around?)
2332Like · Reply · May 23, 2014 3:31pm
2333 
2334Howard Lewis · 
2335University of Washington
2336Frederick Ustinov , my father went pheasant hunting one day with a few friends and they stopped by a country cafe near Moscow. There was a patron eating peas with a table knife by quickly flipping them one at a time into his mouth from the plate. I hope to have time to practice this. Any word on this fellow's whereabouts?
2337Like · Reply · Jun 7, 2014 7:31pm
2338 
2339Aazar Kund · 
2340Senior Research Associate at Researcher
2341The so called global guardians are very much involved in illicit nuclear proliferation. US from the very beginning proliferated nuclear technology to Israel. Its United States which has supplied nuclear technology to Israel and there is very much surety that the 9/11 was preplanned. In order to invade Muslim world US and Israeli lobbies started an unending war. It is actually bitter reality where Military-Industrial complex in United States creates such an environment where state machinery moves out for war business. The lobbies in side US for domestic economic gains initiates war which is profitable business for them.
2342Like · Reply · May 21, 2014 9:43am
2343 
2344Tony Arron · 
2345Cairo University
2346Nuclear proliferation and today's threat of nuclear terrorism to mankind is created from the same states that started the race to achieve the maximum power for global hegemony. Starting from the Bruch plan to stop the proliferation, the US itself started proliferation to the allies state and to control the economic progress through military strategies has in strong non-state actors working for the states in the shape of MICs. Israeli lobbies harbored by the US policies have led the development to the worst benefits of mankind. Above revelations clearly demonstrate who is puppet and who is controlling.
2347Like · Reply · May 21, 2014 12:21pm
2348 
2349Todd W Butson
2350I find it interesting that you try to set things up and then label a bunch of your "proof" as quote: "to classified to publish"... which is a crock of shit.
2351
2352If you have the documents, you can publish them for all to see. If you cannot then it means one of two things.. either this is all bullshit and you have nothing OR you are part of the government and this is all mis-direction.
2353
2354Who determines what is "to classified to publish'? You? If this were legit the first thing you would want to do is get that FACTUAL data and those documents out to as many people as possible and not try to make it all sound so secret and hush hush.. this is NOT the military nor some secret committee here.. 
2355
2356You want people to take anything as true, then shows us the money.. i.e. the proof.
2357Like · Reply · May 21, 2014 12:54pm
2358 
2359Dakota Jourdan · 
2360Ivy Tech Community College
2361John b Lucas is a disinformation agent. Look at his profile, it's a fake account solely made to spread lies.
2362Like · Reply ·  3 · May 22, 2014 6:00am
2363 
2364John B Lucas II · 
2365Brick Computer Science Institute
2366Really sunshine?
2367Like · Reply · May 22, 2014 10:21pm
2368 
2369Frederick Ustinov · 
2370Throw a piece of cat poop at Jonathan Gruber
2371That guy reeks of stale government cheese alright
2372Like · Reply · May 23, 2014 3:26pm
2373 
2374Ralph Lopez · 
2375Works at Freelance journalist
2376Interesting info, possible that tactical nukes were part of the mix, but I still object to the term "dropped the buildings." The buildings didn't drop it's more accurate to say they exploded outward, in thousands of short, straight, cleanly cut lengths of steel beam. This is perfectly explained by the use of standard cutter and kicker charges, first charge cuts the piece, next charge a split second later "kicks" it out of the line of freefall. In the satellite photo 10 days later you can see the core beams and perimeter walls laying nearly a quarter mile away. SEE: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth website: "HOW IT WAS DONE, 9/11 AND THE SCIENCE OF BUILDING DEMOLITION"
2377http://www.ae911truth.org/.../867-how-it-was-done-911-and...
2378Like · Reply ·  3 · May 22, 2014 4:53pm
2379 
2380Ronald Cutburth · 
2381Ph.D. Management of Engineering Science Ops.
2382The article has lots of fraud claims in it. It is a deliberate fabrication. Dr. Ronald Cutburth, Ph.D., management of engineering science operations, engineering scientist, intelligence expert. Expoosives brought the buidlings down. This another fabrication should be punishable for fraud.
2383Like · Reply · May 22, 2014 5:39pm
2384 
2385Davis-Guess Wendy · 
2386Albert Gallatin Area Senior High School
2387A trial is the last thing they want.
2388Like · Reply · May 23, 2014 12:42am
2389 
2390Howard Lewis · 
2391University of Washington
2392Mr. Cutburth, I documented the nuclear component to the original preset demolition system, installed during construction, as it occurred. Daddy was one of the guys who procured the engineering bid for Skilling and Associates. A few of the others were old family frends. This point is not available for debate or argument. If you wish to argue or debate in futility, join Dr. Fetzer and his hologram campaign. Personally, I think he is playing it tongue in cheek to draw attention to the details of the impact sites proving exterior perimeter panels were cut squarely to accommodate the jets' total penetrations into the buildings. Photos and videos PROVE many of the thin steel perimeter panels were squarely cut to provide access. This proves conspiracy, treason, and mass murder of Americans, all potentially capital crimes. Turn off your Goddamned CFRtv set and help the U.S. out. Ya'll been sleeping.
2393Like · Reply ·  1 · Jun 8, 2014 5:18pm
2394 
2395Stephen Persaud · 
2396Just a cook (under seige) at Universal Music UK
2397the plot thickens.....
2398
2399http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponerology
2400
2401http://www.activistpost.com/.../is-conspiracy-theory...
2402
2403https://seeker401.wordpress.com/.../strange-events-that.../
2404Like · Reply ·  2 · May 23, 2014 2:53am
2405 
2406Steven Sokinas
2407Hi Mr. Duff. I am a very big fan of yours. I have a friend who is disputing your claims and says no nukes were used after reading an article by a Mr. Bollyn. Personally, I believe in the nuke theory. One of the things he pointed out in his article was the, “vaporized’ 20 ton antenna tower atop the south tower" After doing some searching on the Internet, I saw that there was no antenna on the South Tower, but there was one on the North Tower and it doesn't appear to have been vaporized. 
2408
2409Another thing my friend pointed out because of Bollyn's article is that no nuclear bomb could of done this...See More
2410Like · Reply ·  2 · May 24, 2014 3:52am
2411 
2412Leslie Crofford · 
2413Del Mar College
2414The antenna was on the North Tower. If you were to research underground nuke explosions that fits the WTC which wasn't fully contained. I don't know if you have researched the military's underground nuke testing. Heres a Dimitri Khalesov video which shows how it done. It leaves a crater at the bottom and the building falls into the crater, pulverizing leaving the upper part somewhat intact. Check out:http://ac31.blogspot.com/.../support-ing-evidence-for... 
2415
2416What I have found is vaporized people, WTC pieces ejected up to 374 feet embedding into other building, people...See More
2417Like · Reply ·  3 · Jun 22, 2014 8:54am
2418 
2419Leslie Crofford · 
2420Del Mar College
2421I've got alot more proof which I'll be back with cause my computer just crashed.
2422Like · Reply ·  1 · Jun 22, 2014 9:22am
2423 
2424Jeff Lewin
2425Leslie Crofford Sure, get back to us...
2426Like · Reply · Oct 10, 2015 5:28am
2427 
2428Womb Doomer
2429http://soundcloud.com/wombdoomer/womb-doomer-ackbars-lament
2430Like · Reply · May 25, 2014 4:44pm
2431 
2432Ralph Kermit Winterrowd
2433Does anyone actually believe this. Go to WhereDidTheTowersGo.com and look at REAL facts instead of this nonsense
2434Like · Reply · May 26, 2014 3:02pm
2435 
2436Howard Lewis · 
2437University of Washington
2438The high radiation device radiated straight up through the core towers. That is what was the directed component of the demolition done that day.
2439Like · Reply ·  1 · Jun 7, 2014 7:38pm
2440 
2441Laura Green
2442911 – Masters of Deception http://zioncrimefactory.com/masters-of-deception/
2443Like · Reply ·  1 · Aug 21, 2015 1:31pm
2444 
2445Trevor Steele
2446Ralph you are trolling !!
2447Like · Reply ·  2 · Sep 13, 2015 1:06am
2448 
2449Ron Hey · 
2450Waterland College
2451One of Best 9/11 articles I red since 9/11-2001. Thank you Putin.you are a Hero!
2452Like · Reply ·  9 · Jun 3, 2014 7:49pm
2453 
2454Donald Brickham · 
2455Green Bay, Wisconsin
2456My concern is that those involved still have these nukes .Also they have anthrax. Maybe this is why JADE HELM 15 is in operation.
2457Like · Reply ·  2 · Aug 14, 2015 8:51pm
2458 
2459Laura Green
2460Israel did 9/11 - ALL THE PROOF IN THE WORLD http://theinfounderground.com/smf/index.php?topic=5367.0
2461Like · Reply ·  1 · Aug 21, 2015 1:34pm
2462 
2463Recycling
2464Coherent Robin https://www.facebook.com/occupy.politiek
2465Like · Reply · Oct 22, 2015 6:45pm
2466 
2467Donald Brickham · 
2468Green Bay, Wisconsin
2469My understanding is that one of these nukes was used on the FALSE FLAG OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING. WEB SEARCH - ABLE DANGER INVESTIGATION ( NUKE USED IN OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING . PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON WAS ASKED BY MONICA LEWINSKY NOT TO CONTINUE THE INVESTIGATION OF ABLE DANGER. AT THE TIME MONICA LEWINSKY WAS A MOSSAD AGENT. ALL OF THESE FALSE FLAG EVENTS WERE USED TO TAKE AWAY OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. AMERICAN CITIZENS NEED TO REPEAL THE PATRIOTS ACT, HOMELAND SECURITY, IMMIGRATION REFORM ACT AND ANY OTHER LEGISLATION THAT VIOLATES OUR CONSTITUTION.FALSE FLAG EVENTS - OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING, 911WTC TERRORIST ATTACK, NAVY YARD SHOOTING, SANDY HOOK HOAX NO CHILDREN DIED, BOSTON BOMBING, WEB SEARCH IT'S ALL THERE.
2470Like · Reply ·  4 · Aug 14, 2015 8:58pm
2471 
2472Tyler Walker Ringo · 
2473Works at Freelance Designer
2474WHERE IS THE ORIGINAL SOURCE. This is total bullshit dis-information on the grandest scale. Nice try retards. Nothing in this article even makes sense and it's only purpose is to give a false conpsiracy theory to detract from the actual theory. If not, then show your source where Russia 'dumped' this. 
2475
2476You can't find it cause it dosen't exist obiviously.
2477Like · Reply · Oct 7, 2015 11:18pm
2478 
2479Jeff Lewin
2480So the Russian government is the source of this information. Of course, it only makes sense that they would release this shocking disclosure through VT, rather than their foreign ministry.
2481
2482Get real.
2483Like · Reply · Oct 10, 2015 5:34am
2484 
2485Carolyn Henry · 
2486Hyper Island
2487I would like to see a Source link, please.
2488Like · Reply · Oct 11, 2015 2:36am
2489 
2490Robin Salazar · 
2491Works at U.S. Army Retired
2492Just look at Building #7 collapse, no plane hit it...so why in hell did it collapse?
2493Like · Reply · Oct 11, 2015 6:06pm
2494 
2495Holly Oliver · 
2496Journalist at Rothschild family
2497John B Lucas is a fag Spook. MK Ultra result. Any person I have interviewed in my career of military status know the truth and some die for knowing the truth. So backwoods redneck go coon hunting because you have made not one intelligent point in this thread. Your an assclown or a brainwashed Fed.
2498Like · Reply · Oct 12, 2015 9:14pm
2499 
2500Joseph Shirk · 
2501Translator at Newmessage.org
2502how was there an underground detonation if photos show the basement intact?
2503Like · Reply ·  1 · Oct 18, 2015 12:09pm
2504 
2505Jason Shults
2506I'm not in agreement with the article. First of all, I've never heard of fissile material in which the radioactivity lasts just 72 hours. Second, eye-witness testimony speaks of not one explosion on the lower levels, but several. Third, the I-beams at the WTC 1&2 showed cutting that is identical to controlled demolitions. Fourth, even the big towers came straight down from the top down; the collapses didn't start low. Fifth, incredibly huge and heavy parts of the big towers were flung horizontally as the buildings came down with force that does not mesh with a single low-yield internal I-beam ...See More
2507Like · Reply ·  1 · Nov 20, 2015 7:14am
2508 
2509Chris Hirsch · 
2510Chestermere High School
2511looks like you need to do some reading.... im not saying your right or wong. im just saying your being lied to..... but how the towerers fell is not how they should have... but i think you and i can agree the amarican gov. has... and is... lieing to you. so.... i will leave it up to you to chose if this is another lie that you are being feed... heres a link.
2512
2513https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy_Crockett_(nuclear_device)
2514Like · Reply · Dec 8, 2015 6:21pm
2515 
2516Chris Hirsch · 
2517Chestermere High School
2518oh and this to...
2519
2520http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/
2521Like · Reply · Dec 8, 2015 6:25pm
2522 
2523Robert Hall · 
2524Indian River State College
2525Complete bullshit, a bunch of "editors notes" about "confirmed" reports is not proof. If it happened show some proof. Nukes going off in NYC in front of huge crowds and thousands of cameras, and thousands of investigators could not be missed or covered up. All the networks not just Fox would have killed to expose it.
2526Like · Reply · Dec 9, 2015 12:20pm · Edited
2527 
2528Rob Ricco · 
2529CPA at Robert Ricco, Inc
2530Editor's note: Fully confirmed? This would fail 5th grade English class for the pathetic lack of any credible source whatsoever - I'm not saying it's not possible but the article is a complete joke
2531Like · Reply · Dec 15, 2015 6:19pm
2532 
2533Margo Gail Antwine · 
2534Accounting Assistant at Loanbank Properties Limited
2535We are loyally affianced in providing Property Loan Services to the honored patrons. This loan is being offered after mortgaging the property of the patrons and the loan is being obtainable at very low interest rate. It is at the lowermost interest rates our service is highly valued and appreciated for quick and instant response. Our crew offer loan against, housing loans, renovation loans, purchase loan, property loan commercial and land property.
2536
2537Incorporated on the 26th Jan 1996, Loanbank Properties Ltd is one of the illustrious companies immersed in providing loan services for Balance Tra...See More
2538Like · Reply · Dec 17, 2015 3:41pm
2539 
2540John Minarcik · 
2541University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine
2542Makes a lot of sense!
2543Like · Reply · Dec 23, 2015 3:27pm
2544
2545107 Responses to "Too Classified to Publish: Bush Nuclear Piracy Exposed"
2546← Older Comments
25471.	 Goku September 15, 2015 at 6:30 pm
2548We need a revolution period and we can’t o it like a coup ow ukraine was done we need patriot in the military to rise up and help arrest all Israeli firsters can u imagine if most our congress n senators were dual Muslim Americans with Arab country passport and American cite how will that fly there should be no elected official that holds dual citizen only oathe to USA I’m dumbfound how we let them take over and the worst is we’re are the real patriot in military who should be quitting in droves instead of fighting fir these fake Jews there so scared being labelled anti Semite thats a lab,e of honor for me I’ll take t proudly I’m anti Zionist imagine if we return the statment saying well your anti islam hahaha who cares right again we 
2549read more ...
2550Log in to Reply
25512.	 Resilient Robinson June 7, 2014 at 2:51 pm
2552There is a wealth of cool, factual information on the disintegration of the Towers in Dr. Judy Wood’s book “Where Did the Towers Go”. Stunning read.
2553Log in to Reply
25543.	 Ignotzle May 28, 2014 at 11:34 am
2555It is highly important to realize, since Khalezov has been mentioned in this article, that in his 1096 page tome called 9/11-thology, he does not claim mini-nukes were used on the towers. Full blown mega kilo-ton devices had been placed underneath the towers at construction to serve insurance purposes. They were detonated stop what could have been a more catastrophic scenario IF nuclear devices they were told had been placed in the tops of the towers had been detonated. This was not true, but the perps who pulled this off used it as leverage to get those buried nukes to be detonated TO KEEP THE SUPPOSED OTHER NUKES HIGHER UP FROM GOING OFF….
2556Log in to Reply
25571.	 Ignotzle May 28, 2014 at 11:37 am
2558To continue…………which would have basically wiped out NYC.
2559Excuse the errors, but for some reason, this was submitted before I could edit it.
25604.	 CoJonesGrandes May 25, 2014 at 6:32 pm
2561Mike Harris and Gordon Duff discuss this
2562http //www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0IQ9E5Sgzo
2563Log in to Reply
25645.	 LC May 25, 2014 at 7:27 am
2565RE below comment on “The EMP evidence are the “toasted” cars and no burning paper.”
2566RiteOn –
2567@ 5.30 – EMP form sun burned electric telegraph cables in the 1800s!!!!!
2568EMP Proof Vehicle ???
2569******www.youtube.com/watch?v=50JKBHPAnIY
2570What the car-maker doesn’t realize is that no electric current in his car will work as long as EMP pulses emit. That goes for his ignition-battery-lights+++ & so it would not budge unless EMP emission stops.
2571BTW – WTC car handles burned & fell off with EMP because their wired electric locks had electric current in them when WTC nukes went off so every thing that had electric current running in it ignited like a match!!!
2572Log in to Reply
25736.	 tmatson May 24, 2014 at 1:49 pm
2574Israel is a clear and present danger to the entire world, The Jews brought down Rome with the help of the Hun/Chinese–of course they never play fair they poisoned the population before the attack so most were unable to put up any type of resistance to their slaughter. FYI–Jews consider themselves the “Human Race” because they originated in Northern China–moving from one kingdom to the next breeding, and slowing taking over each area they moved into–by pretending to be locals–but loyal only to each other. Europe’s Nobility is and was made up of almost all jewish people–that is why only royals in century’s past were circumcised, etc. The experiment called the USA crashed there “royal gig” so in case anyone wonders “why” this is pay back–lets 
2575read more ...
2576Log in to Reply
25777.	 jglassel. May 24, 2014 at 11:35 am
2578wolf-molecule,
2579thanks for this tip, for those concerned about chemtrails, maybe there is something you can do about it. Check it out, anyway. I am gonna build the rain maker for kicks
2580do you know anything about ‘orgonite’? It looks like something we could all do…a way to fight back against the machine. ****http //www.orgonite.info/
2581Log in to Reply
25828.	 John Kirby May 23, 2014 at 2:18 am
2583HOW WILL WE EVER REALLY KNOW HOW 911 WAS DONE? A WHISTLEBLOWER?
2584Log in to Reply
25850.	 ani May 23, 2014 at 2:48 am
2586as with Malaysia Flight 370, until we hear/learn/know for sure
2587we must live with what we think is unbearable mystery
2588But the people who really DO know, they are in the hell/torment of their own making
2589in the now and here
2590aka nowhere.
2591I have heard it said, and suspect the truth of these words, that the Israelis fear nothing so much as being delegitimised.
2592Same must be true for so-called royals.
2593What are these people protecting, apart from self-aggrandisement/chosen-ness?
2594For them all life on Planet Earth is held to ransom?!?
2595Do not wait for any whistle-blower but let us do what we can, where we are, with what we have.
25969.	 John Kirby May 23, 2014 at 2:18 am
2597HOW WILL WE EVER REALLY KNOW HOW 911 WAS DONE? A WHISTLEBLOWER?
2598Log in to Reply
259910.	 Simpsons Donkey May 22, 2014 at 7:07 am
2600Just an aditional to the likely mini-nuke strikes the nuke artillery strike on a Syrian military barrack near Damascus in 2012. I believe the location was Jamrayya.
2601Although the target was on the other side of mount Qasioun from Damascus, the whole city was vivdly illuminated by a colossal series of flashes. 55 Syrian soldiers and civilians were killed. The Khazaris alleged they were striking ‘rockets bound for Hezbollah’ … as they would.
2602Despite being in a not-built-up area, this strike obliterated a big extent …. including an entire chicken farm. Radioactivity was measured, and Syria quietly notched up another reason to drive the ZioNazis into the sea.
2603Log in to Reply
260411.	 Lindsay Newton May 22, 2014 at 6:48 am
2605After reading this and also Jim Stone,s thorough report on the Fukashima Nuclear Reactor which appears to have used them same Nuclear method to destroy it and certainly not a Tsunami, it,s would seem that we have an extremely out of control Government and Israeli supported rogue elements that will stop at nothing to get what they want.
2606Log in to Reply
260712.	 Lindsay Newton May 22, 2014 at 6:24 am
2608After reading this and also jim stone,s thorough report on the Fukishima Nuclear Reactor which appears to have used them same Nuclear method to destroy it and certainly not a Tsunami, it,s would seem that we have an extremely out of control Government supported rogue element that will stop at nothing to get what they want.
2609Log in to Reply
2610
2611
2612Israel's Worst-Kept Secret
2613Is the silence over Israeli nukes doing more harm than good?
2614 
2615Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Moshe Ya'alon present seized rockets that were allegedly supplied by Iran and destined for Gaza. Amir Cohen/Reuters
2616•	1.5k
2617 
2618•	DOUGLAS BIRCH AND R. JEFFREY SMITH
2619 
2620•	 SEP 16, 2014
2621 
2622•	 GLOBAL
2623Israel has a substantial arsenal of nuclear weapons.
2624Former CIA Director Robert Gates said so during his 2006 Senate confirmation hearings for secretary of defense, when he noted—while serving as a university president—that Iran is surrounded by “powers with nuclear weapons,” including “the Israelis to the west.” Former President Jimmy Carter said so in 2008 and again this year, in interviews and speeches in which he pegged the number of Israel’s nuclear warheads at 150 to around 300.
2625But due to a quirk of federal secrecy rules, such remarks generally cannot be made even now by those who work for the U.S. government and hold active security clearances. In fact, U.S. officials, even those on Capitol Hill, are routinely admonished not to mention the existence of an Israeli nuclear arsenal and occasionally punished when they do so.
2626The policy of never publicly confirming what a scholar once called one of the world’s “worst-kept secrets” dates from a political deal between the United States and Israel in the late 1960s. Its consequence has been to help Israel maintain a distinctive military posture in the Middle East while avoiding the scrutiny—and occasional disapprobation—applied to the world’s eight acknowledged nuclear powers.
2627But the U.S. policy of shielding the Israeli program has recently provoked new controversy, partly because of allegations that it played a role in the censure of a well-known national-laboratory arms researcher in July, after he published an article in which he acknowledged that Israel has nuclear arms. Some scholars and experts are also complaining that the government’s lack of candor is complicating its high-profile campaign to block the development of nuclear arms in Iran, as well as U.S.-led planning for a potential treaty prohibiting nuclear arms anywhere in the region.
2628RELATED STORY
2629 
2630The Point of No Return
2631The U.S. silence is largely unwavering, however. “We would never say flatly that Israel has nuclear weapons,” explained a former senior State Department official who dealt with nuclear issues during the Bush administration. “We would have to couch it in other language, we would have to say ‘we assume’ or ‘we presume that Israel has nuclear weapons,’ or ‘it’s reported’ that they have them,” the former official said, requesting that his name not be used due to the political sensitivity surrounding the topic.
2632President Barack Obama made clear that this four-decade-old U.S. policy would persist at his first White House press conference in 2009, when journalist Helen Thomas asked if he knew of any nations in the Middle East with nuclear arms. “With respect to nuclear weapons, you know, I don’t want to speculate,” Obama said, as though Israel’s established status as a nuclear-weapons state was only a matter of rumor and conjecture.
2633So wary is Paul Pillar, a former U.S. national-intelligence officer for the Middle East, of making any direct, public reference to Israel’s nuclear arsenal that when he wrote an article this month in The National Interest, entitled “Israel’s Widely Suspected Unmentionables,” he referred to warheads as “kumquats” throughout his manuscript.
2634Even Congress has been coy on the subject. When the Senate Foreign Relations Committee published a 2008 report titled “Chain Reaction: Avoiding a Nuclear Arms Race in the Middle East,” it included chapters on Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Turkey—but not Israel. The 61-page report relegated Israel’s nuclear arms to a footnote that suggested that Israel’s arsenal was a “perception.”
2635“This report does not take a position on the existence of Israeli nuclear weapons,” the report said. “Although Israel has not officially acknowledged it possesses nuclear weapons, a widespread consensus exists in the region and among experts in the United States that Israel possesses a number of nuclear weapons. For Israel’s neighbors, this perception is more important than reality.”
2636While former White House or cabinet-level officers—such as Gates—have gotten away with more candor, the bureaucracy does not take honesty by junior officials lightly. James Doyle, a veteran nuclear analyst at Los Alamos National Laboratory who was recently censured, evidently left himself open to punishment by straying minutely from U.S. policy in a February 2013 article published by the British journal Survival.
2637“Nuclear weapons did not deter Egypt and Syria from attacking Israel in 1973, Argentina from attacking British territory in the 1982 Falklands War or Iraq from attacking Israel during the 1991 Gulf War,” Doyle said in a bitingly critical appraisal of Western nuclear policy, which angered his superiors at the nuclear-weapons lab as well as a Republican staff member of the House Armed Services Committee.
2638Even though three secrecy specialists at the lab concluded the article contained no secrets, more senior officials overruled them and cited an unspecified breach as justification for censuring Doyle and declaring the article classified, after its publication. They docked his pay, searched his home computer, and, eventually,fired him this summer. The lab has said his firing—as opposed to the censure and search—was not related to the article’s content, but Doyle and his lawyer have said they are convinced it was pure punishment for his skepticism about the tenets of nuclear deterrence.
2639Neither Doyle nor his colleagues revealed if the sentence in his article about Israel’s arsenal was the one that provoked officials to nitpick about a security violation, but several independent experts have surmised it was.
2640Steven Aftergood, director of the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists, said the clues lie in the Energy Department’s citation—in a document summarizing the facts behind Doyle’s unsuccessful appeal of his ill treatment—of a classification bulletin numbered “WPN-136.”
2641Paul Pillar was so wary of writing about Israel's warheads directly that he referred to them as "kumquats" instead.
2642The full, correct title of that bulletin, according to an Energy Department circular, is “WNP-136, Foreign Nuclear Capabilities.” The classification bulletin itself is not public. But Aftergood said Doyle’s only reference to a sensitive foreign nuclear program was his mention of Israel’s, making it highly probable this was the cudgel the lab used against him. “I’m certain that that’s what it is,” Aftergood said in an interview.
2643The circumstances surrounding Doyle’s censure are among several cases now being examined by Department of Energy (DOE) Inspector General Gregory Friedman, as part of a broader examination of inconsistent classification practices within the department and the national laboratories, several officials said.
2644Doyle’s reference to the existence of Israel’s nuclear arsenal reflects the consensus intelligence judgment within DOE nuclear weapons-related laboratories, former officials say. But some said they find it so hard to avoid any public reference to the weapons that classification officers periodically hold special briefings about skirting the issue.
2645“It was one of those things that was not obvious,” a former laboratory official said, asking not to be identified due to the sensitivity of the topic. “Especially when there’s so much about it in the open domain.”
2646Israel’s nuclear-weapons program began in the 1950s, and the country is widely believed to have assembled its first three weapons during the crisis leading to the Six-Day War in 1967, according to the Nuclear Threat Initiative, a nonprofit group in Washington that tracks nuclear-weapons developments.
2647For decades, however, Israel itself has wrapped its nuclear program in a policy it calls amimut, meaning opacity or ambiguity. By hinting at but not confirming that it has these weapons, Israel has sought to deter its enemies from a major attack without provoking a concerted effort by others to develop a matching arsenal.
2648Israeli-American historian Avner Cohen has written that U.S. adherence to this policy evidently grew out of a September 1969 meeting between President Richard Nixon and Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir. No transcript of the meeting has surfaced, but Cohen said it is clear the two leaders struck a deal: Israel would not test its nuclear weapons or announce it possessed them, while the United States wouldn’t press Israel to give them up or to sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty, and would halt its annual inspections of Dimona, the site of Israel’s Negev Nuclear Research Center.
2649As an outgrowth of the deal, Washington, moreover, would adopt Israel’s secret as its own, eventually acquiescing to a public formulation of Israeli policy that was initially strenuously opposed by top U.S. officials.
2650 Golda Meir, Richard Nixon, and Henry Kissinger in 1973, four years after an earlier meeting that may have established the policy of mutual silence regarding Israel's nuclear armaments. (Wikimedia)
2651“Israel will not be the first country to introduce nuclear weapons into the Middle East,” the boilerplate Israeli account has long stated. “Israel supports a Middle East free of all weapons of mass destruction following the attainment of peace.” When Nixon’s aides sought assurances that this pledge meant Israel would not actually build any bombs, Israeli officials said the word “introduce” would have a different meaning: It meant the country would not publicly test bombs or admit to possessing them, leaving ample room for its unacknowledged arsenal.
2652“While we might ideally like to halt actual Israeli possession,” then-National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger wrote in a July 1969 memo to Nixon that summarized Washington’s enduring policy, “what we really want at a minimum may be just to keep Israeli possession from becoming an established international fact.”
2653Even when Mordechai Vanunu, a technician at Dimona, provided the first detailed, public account of the program in 1986 and released photos he had snapped there of nuclear-weapons components, both countries refused to shift gears. After being snatched from Italy, Vanunu was imprisoned by Israel for 18 years, mostly in solitary confinement, and subsequently forbidden to travel abroad or deal substantively with foreign journalists. In an email exchange with the Center for Public Integrity, Vanunu indicated that he still faces restrictions but did not elaborate. “You can write me again when I am free, out of Israel,” he said.
2654The avoidance of candor has sometimes extended to private government channels. A former U.S. intelligence official said he recalled being flabbergasted in the 1990s by the absence of any mention of Israel in a classified document purporting to describe all foreign nuclear-weapons programs. He said he complained to colleagues at the time that “we’ve really got a problem if we can’t acknowledge the truth even in classified documents,” and finally won a grudging but spare mention of the country’s weaponry.
2655Gary Samore, who was President Obama’s top advisor on nuclear nonproliferation from 2009 to 2013, said the United States has long preferred that Israel hold to its policy of amimut, out of concern that other Middle Eastern nations would feel threatened by Israel’s coming out of the nuclear closet.
2656“For the Israelis to acknowledge and declare it, that would be seen as provocative,” he said. “It could spur some of the Arab states and Iran to produce weapons. So we like calculated ambiguity.” But when asked point-blank if the fact that Israel has nuclear weapons is classified, Samore—who is now at Harvard University—answered: “It doesn’t sound very classified to me—that Israel has nuclear weapons?”
2657The U.S. government’s official silence was broken only by accident, when, in 1979, the CIA released a four-page summary of an intelligence memorandum titled “Prospects for Further Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons” in response to a Freedom of Information Act request by the Natural Resources Defense Council, a nonprofit environmental group.
2658“We believe that Israel already has produced nuclear weapons,” the 1974 report said, citing Israel’s stockpiling of large quantities of uranium, its uranium-enrichment program, and its investment in a costly missile system capable of delivering nuclear warheads. Release of the report triggered a spate of headlines. “CIA said in 1974 Israel had A-Bombs,” a New York Times headline declared. “Israel a Nuclear Club Member Since 1974, CIA Study Indicates,” announcedThe Washington Star.
2659For decades, Israel itself has wrapped its nuclear program in a policy it callsamimut, meaning opacity or ambiguity.
2660But it stemmed from a goof.
2661John Despres, who was the CIA’s national-intelligence officer for nuclear proliferation at the time, said he was in charge of censoring or “redacting” the secret material from the report prior to its release. But portions he wanted withheld were released, he said in an interview, while sections that were supposed to be released were withheld.
2662“This was a sort of classic case of a bureaucratic screw-up,” said Despres, now retired. “People misinterpreted my instructions.” He said that as far as he knows, no one was disciplined for the mix-up. Moreover, in 2008, when the National Security Archive obtained a copy of the document under the Freedom of Information Act, that judgment remained unexcised.
2663But Washington’s refusal to confirm the obvious in any other way has produced some weird trips down the rabbit hole for those seeking official data about the Israeli arsenal. Bryan Siebert, who was the most senior career executive in charge of guarding DOE’s nuclear-weapons secrets from 1992 to 2002, said he recalls seeing a two-cubic-foot stack at one point of CIA, FBI, Justice, and Energy department documents about Israel’s nuclear program.
2664John Fitzpatrick, who since 2011 has served as director of the federal Information Security Oversight Office, confirmed that “aspects” of Israel’s nuclear status are considered secret by the United States. “We know this from classifying authorities at agencies who handle that material,” said Fitzpatrick, who declined to provide more details.
2665Kerry Brodie, director of communications for the Israeli embassy in Washington, similarly said no one there would discuss the subject of the country’s nuclear status. “Unfortunately, we do not have any comment we can share at this point,” she wrote in an email. A former speaker of the Israeli Knesset, Avraham Burg, was less discrete during a December 2013 conference in Haifa, where he said“Israel has nuclear and chemical weapons” and called the policy of ambiguity “outdated and childish.”
2666Through a spokesman, Robert Gates declined to discuss the issue. But a growing number of U.S. experts agree with Burg.
2667Pillar, for example, wrote in his article this month that the 45-year-old U.S. policy of shielding Israel’s program is seen around the world “as not just a double standard but living a lie. Whatever the United States says about nuclear weapons will always be taken with a grain of salt or with some measure of disdain as long as the United States says nothing about kumquats.”
2668Victor Gilinsky, a physicist and former member of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission who has written about the history of the Israeli program, complained in a recent book that “the pretense of ignorance about Israeli bombs does not wash anymore. … The evident double standard undermines efforts to control the spread of nuclear weapons worldwide.”
2669J. William Leonard, who ran a government-wide declassification effort as President George W. Bush’s director of the Information Security Oversight Office from 2002 to 2008, commented that “in some regards, it undermines the integrity of the classification system when you’re using classification to officially protect a known secret. It can get exceedingly awkward, obviously.”
2670Aftergood said the secrecy surrounding Israel’s nuclear weapons is “obsolete and fraying around the edges. … It takes an effort to preserve the fiction that this is a secret,” he said. Meanwhile, he added, it can still be abused as an instrument for punishing federal employees such as Doyle for unrelated or politically inspired reasons. “Managers have broad discretion to overlook or forgive a particular infraction,” Aftergood said. “The problem is that discretion can be abused. And some employees get punished severely while others do not.”
2671Dana H. Allin, the editor of Doyle’s article in Survival magazine, said in a recentcommentary published by the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London that “anyone with a passing knowledge of international affairs knows about these weapons.” He called the government’s claim that the article contained secrets “ludicrous” and said Doyle’s ordeal at the hands of the classification authorities was nothing short of Kafkaesque.
2672http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/09/israel-nuclear-weapons-secret-united-states/380237/
2673
2674NUCLEAR BLACKMAIL
2675Permalink
2676Israel's nuclear deterrent method exposed. This information was discovered as part of myfukushima report
2677Israel is keeping a dirty little secret . . . . .
2678Jim Stone, Freelance Journalist, Jan 8 2012
2679There is a reason why the U.S. government is waging war all over the world, even obviously against the good of the nation.
2680There is a reason why the U.S. government rapidly rolled over and did the banker bailout without question, in an amount which exceeded the value of every mortgage in the country by more than 3x, and every mortgage in default by over 15x; an amount which will destroy America once the ripple effect is finished.
2681Many of you are no doubt scratching your heads, wondering why every elected president turns back on his campaign promises the second the inaguration is complete. Believe me, the corruption of American elected officials is not that deep. You cannot elect several presidents in sequence, and have them all perfectly screw the country, ESPECIALLY the way Bush and Obama did; they had their reason, and it is called NUCLEAR BLACKMAIL.
2682What if they never wanted to renig (at least not so completely)? What about Obama? And what about the other countries, which also screwed their people the same way? Why is it seemingly a universal truth, that all governments around the world are simultaneously going against the will of their people, in favor of the Jewish bankers and Israel?
2683I believe I have figured it out, and I have documented it.
2684I am going to tell you the hows and whys of Israel's dirty little secret - how they got their nuclear offensive capability in place, why they decided on the chosen method, and how they ended up using it.
2685Israel had a serious launch dilemma
2686Israel is in a unique predicament. It's small land mass and hostile neighborhood have made developing a space program and ballistic missile defense system all but impossible.
2687Geography matters. Most nations are priviledged to have vast tracts of land suitible for space launches, or friendly neighbors who will permit the use of their airspace during a space launch. Israel is not one of them.
2688If a rocket is to be put to its most practical use, it must launch toward the rising sun to make use of earth's rotational velocity and add it to the speed of the rocket. If a rocket is launched towards the setting sun, it must first accelerate to the speed of the earth's rotation, and then an additional 1,000 mph just to get to where zero would have been with an eastward launch. Though it can be done, it wastes fuel and after launch another problem then presents itself - your payload will be traveling opposite to all the many thousands of other satellites and space debris in orbit and an eventual catastrophic collision is virtually assured. This has made westward launches both taboo and difficult. Westward launches are considered unacceptable, though Israel has done it.
2689Israel has been stifled in space of because of these difficulties. The prime Eastward launch direction will violate both Jordani and Saudi airspace, because a rocket has to reach an altitude of 60 miles to be formally above, and not trespassing on a nation. Though a straight up launch which then turns East after an acceptable altitude is reached is possible, it will waste so much fuel and require such a large rocket that it will be too impractical to be considered an option. This has spelled doom for a land based ballistic missile defense system in Israel because only a small east to west launch corridor is available over the mediterannean. So while the Israelis have launched satellites into orbit through this window, a ballistic defense system which needs a full 360 degree launch direction to be fully effective is not possible. Israel was forced to both explore and implement other methods of delivering an effective nuclear deterrent.
2690Sadly, their only affordable option allowed them to screw the world
2691What if Israel came up with a way to smuggle nuclear weapons into the most sensitive areas of all the developed nations - areas where if anything big goes BOOM all is lost? Could there be a clandestine reason for the supposed shortage of Helium 3, which is needed in the type of radiation detectors required to detect a nuclear weapon? You can block protons, but neutrons are difficult to shield entirely, and you can forget about neutrinos - you can't hide a nuke from the right detector, one which uses helium 3 in it's detector element. Why did America and all other nations somehow run out of Helium 3 a few years ago, which simultaneously left their borders open to nuclear weapons smuggling? Coincidence? I think not. The picture to the left appears to be a legitimate camera in a body that could also hold a nuke. It does not appear to actually be a nuke. HOWEVER
2692 This particular one in the above picture appears to be a bona fide nuke camera. Note the differences - At the top of the gun barrel, there is a reinforced area to survive the ignition of the projectile propellant. The "cameras" look superficial and appear to be mounted to the surface of the barrel with very little intruding depth. Think about the webcam in your laptop or the camera in your Iphone - Nowadays that's all the depth a very good camera needs if price is no object, so it is easy to build convincing and deceptive functionality into the unit to justify it's enormous size.
2693Israel's main strategy has been to smuggle nuclear weapons into sensitive areas of nations under the disguise of security contracts. These security contracts use "proprietary" equipment that is maintained only by Israelis. In this particular case, the proprietary equipment is stated to be "biscopic" cameras, which are put in place by  security companies operating as front companies on behalf of the Israeli Defense Forces. Magna BSP, the company which provided "security" at the Fukushima nuclear facility in Japan is one of them. During my investigation of the Fukushima mission, I studied Magna BSP and discovered that in addition to Japan, they also got security contracts in Brazil, Germany, and the United States. All 4 of these countries have provided massive financial " bailouts" to zionist bankers, and though I have not proven that all of these countries were blackmailed with the threat of a nuclear armageddon, the coincidence is very suspicious and given what happened in Japan, even a little more than suspicious. In the fukushima report the reason given was that Japan offered to enrich uranium for Iran. But shortly thereafter, Japan damaged it's economy by surrendering 1.7 trillion USD to Jewish bankers even though no prior debt was owed.
2694This particular "camera" is a concept drawing of what the final design will look like. But don't count on it looking that way after this report or the Fukushima report, many large items which can be excused off as security devices can also house a nuke. Additionally, other types of contracts use equipment that is very suitable for housing an implosion nuke, which is often much smaller than a gun nuke.
2695Gun type nukes do not produce very predictable results which is a good explanation for why the other two exploded reactors did not produce a mushroom cloud. Reactor 4, which "exploded" had been de-fueled and did not even have a core in it, this was proven with the classified photos in the Fukushima report. This made the explosion at reactor four flatly impossible. The un predictability of gun nukes is a good reason to move away from them, so I expect the gun nuke camera to be a dying breed. Perhaps the Israelis wanted to get rid of old nuclear inventory, and from the crudeness of the looks of the units delivered thus far, I suspect exactly that. I strongly recommend you take the time and read the Fukushima report in full, it's all documented from official sources, contains about 7 hours of reading material and took hundreds of hours to research out.
2696With the inadequately explained and inexcusable absense of helium 3, most of the world's borders are now wide open for Israel to get it's deterrent fully in place and have been for some time. I believe Israel has multiple nuclear weapons in place in key areas of the United States, Germany, Japan and Brazil, and has plans for or has succeeded in smuggling nukes into many other countries. Israel has been able to make hundreds of nuclear weapons from the reactor in Dimona, and has stolen enough nuclear material from America to make additional thousands. I believe Israel is holding the world nuclear hostage. If anyone says anything, opens their mouth, they get killed. If a nation goes against the will of Israel, and does not submit financially, BOOM. And it will all be blamed on the environment, a meteor, or "terrorists" because after all, TERRORISTS smuggle nukes in through the ports, RIGHT?
2697-SO-
2698The next time that guy you voted for renegs on his campaign promises IMMEDIATELY after inaguration
2699The next time your government forks over unbelievable cash to Jewish bankers and destroys your future;
2700The next time your government sends your children off to die in a war against a nation that never attacked you;
2701The next time a 911 happens;
2702The next time another SOPA act passes, or some other legislation no one wants passes and directs hatred at a government that needs our support to survive:
2703consider this article -- I BET I NAILED IT!
2704http://jimstonefreelance.com/blackmail.html
2705
2706Concrete evidence shows US government nuked New York City on 9/11
2707Posted by Paul W KincaidCorruption, World newsMonday, May 21st, 2012
2708       
2709 
2710What really happened on 9/11?  Foreign terrorists and hijackers didn’t attack the US on September 11, 2001 and bring down the World Trade Center Towers – the U.S. government did that, using controlled impact of unmanned aerial vehicles(UAV) and planted tactical nukes.  The story of the century isn’t about the hijackings of US commercial airlines, it is about the US government using thermal nuclear bombs against another civilian city, for the third and fourth time. This time the 2 nuclear bombings were treasonous – against the US people and on US soil. U. S. President Harry S. Truman authorized the US Military to use two atomic bombs against the Japanese civilian cities of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 and Nagasaki August 9, 1945. U.S. President George W Bush authorized the US CIA to detonate two atomic bombs (thermal nuclear devices) in New York City on September, 11, 2001.
2711It is this disclosure that forced Dick Cheney to go public to distract the public from the irrefutable evidence of nuclear detonations and say he ordered Flight 93 shot down. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QC1QAR5gQrc
2712The US government of George W Bush and Dick Cheney used controlled impacts of US military Boeing aircraft and thermal nuclear devices on US soil, against US civilians, on 9/11. The US government killed thousands on September 11, 2001. They are the ones who attacked the US and the US people. They are the ones who brought down the World Trade Center Towers. bin Laden, Islamic extremists, al Qaeda, the Taliban, and Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11. George W Bush and Dick Cheney planned it, ordered it, executed it and killed US civilians, on US soil, on September 11, 2001.
2713Ground Zero describes the point on the Earth’s surface closest to a nuclear detonation. In the case of an explosion above the ground, ground zero refers to the point on the ground directly below the detonation. On 9/11 the World Trade Center complex became ground zero – the epicentre of a nuclear bomb detonation.
2714At the bombs hypocenter or ground zero of a thermonuclear explosion a temperature is generated of 500 million degrees Fahrenheit. Everything vaporizes instantly at the center of one of these blasts. Underground nuclear detonations of low depth produces a mushroom cloud and a base surge ( a base surge is a cloud which rolls out from the bottom of the column produced by a subsurface burst of a nuclear weapon.), both seen here in the above photo taken on September 11, 2001.
2715One the greatest tragedies resulting from the Sept 11, 2001 attack on the WTC towers in New York City is the plight of the heroic rescue workers who saved thousands of lives on that day. A study published in April of 2010 found that about 20% of the 14,000 responders have permanent lung damage. A large number of those 9/11 first responders has contracted blood cancers at an unusually young age, and top doctors suspect the disease was triggered by an unprecedented “synergistic mix” of toxins at the World Trade Center site. These growth of these cancers among Ground Zero workers, and others, are consistent with exposure to radiation contamination.
2716The WTC Medical Monitoring Program is now studying a group of Ground Zero workers, including cops, construction workers and volunteers, suffering from cancers such as leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma. The blame has been placed on the ‘toxic dust’ clouds which engulfed the area surrounding the towers. While there is little question that particulate matter such as pulverized concrete impacted the health of those who were standing in the blast radius of the falling towers, the huge number of responders who contracted illnesses including rare cancer types is more akin to those who survived the nuclear bomb detonations in Nagasaki and Hiroshima Japan.
2717How does this comparison make any sense? The 9/11 Commission Report officially stated that the city of New York was hit with planes, not a nuclear missile. As it turns out there is a dirty little secret omitted from the 9/11 Commission Report. The World Trade Center Towers were brought down by explosions containing a large quantity of uranium – from underground nuclear detonations. Experts have always said that the towers were intentionally collapsed by controlled demolitions. Structural engineers from around the World have said that it is impossible to cause a collapse of a skyscraper from a fire caused by an aircraft impact. There have been several major high rise fires throughout the World before 9/11 and since then and none have caused a collapse of the structure. The engineers have even used the Empire State building catastrophe as proof of their claim.
2718On the foggy morning of Saturday, July 28, 1945, a U.S. Army B-25 bomber smashed into the north side of the Empire State Building. The majority of the plane hit the 79th floor, creating a hole in the building eighteen feet wide and twenty feet high. The plane’s high-octane fuel exploded, hurtling flames down the side of the building and inside through hallways and stairwells all the way down to the 75th floor. The plane exploded within the building. One of the engines and part of the landing gear hurtled across the 79th floor, through wall partitions and two fire walls, and out the south wall’s windows to fall onto a twelve-story building across 33rd Street. The other engine flew into an elevator shaft and landed on an elevator car. Some debris from the crash fell to the streets below, sending pedestrians scurrying for cover, but most fell onto the buildings setbacks at the fifth floor. Still, a bulk of the wreckage remained stuck in the side of the building. After the flames were extinguished and the remains of the victims removed, the rest of the wreckage was removed through the building. The plane crash killed 14 people (11 office workers and the three crewmen) plus injured 26 others. Even though the B-25 bomber had impacted the building at a high rate of speed and the high octane fuel exploded and inflamed 3 floors of the inside of the building the structural integrity of the Empire State Building was not affected.
2719More recently, on Feb. 12, 2005 in Madrid, the Windsor Tower burned for over 20 hours, which led to a fire stronger and hotter than that in the WTC, but even the collapses of the Windsor Tower caused by the very strong and long-enduring fire were minimal and limited to the upper floors.
2720These known facts explains a great number of anomalies present in the analysis of how the World Trade Center Towers fell. One of the common questions that has puzzled many independent observers was how jet fuel, which burns in open air at about 300 deg C, was able to compromise the integrity of steel, which melts at 1,000 deg C. The presence of depleted uranium at Ground Zero settles this conundrum.
2721According to Rudy Giuliani, the mayor of New York City on September 11, 2001, the fires raged at ground zero ‘for a hundred days’ after the towers were hit. The presence of a high-energy compound such as uranium helps explain how this was sustained long after the jet fuel would have been gone and how the health of so many 9/11 first responders was devastated.
2722 
2723On August 29, 1949, the USSR detonated its first nuclear fission bomb, dubbed “Joe-1” by the U.S. It produced the same type of mushroom cloud and a base surge as witnessed by billions of people around the World on the morning of September 11, 2001.
2724 
2725Storax Sedan was a shallow underground nuclear test conducted in Area 10 of Yucca Flat at the Nevada National Security Site on July 6, 1962 as part of Operation Plowshare, a program to investigate the use of nuclear weapons for mining, cratering, and other civilian purposes. The 100 kiloton Sedan nuclear bomb was buried at a depth of 635 feet. The detonation produced a mushroom cloud and base surge – typical of shallow-buried nuclear explosions. The cloud is highly contaminated with radioactive dust particles and produces an intense local fallout.
2726Experts, both military and civil engineers, have concluded that the only plausible explanation for what happened to the World Trade Center Towers on September 11, 2001 is that small underground nuclear detonations were involved in the collapse of the WTC towers. The over ten million degrees of heat created by a thermonuclear detonation sublimated all water within the concrete of the structure in a moment. Water explodes extremely quickly into 24-fold volume and totally pulverizes the concrete. Burning radiation is absorbed in steel so quickly that steel heats up immediately over its melting point 1585 °C (approx. 2890 °F) and above its boiling point around 3000 C (approx. 5430 °F). Super hot groups of steel pillars and columns, torn from wall by pressure wave, are sublimated. They immediately turn into a vaporized form, binding heat as quickly as possible. Vertical bursts are not possible for a gravitational collapse or for cutting charges which are used horizontally but on the morning of September 11, 2001 we saw exactly that – a nuclear detonation.
2727Project Plowshare
2728The following video discusses the Plowshare Program – a program that promoted using the energy produced from nuclear explosions for peaceful uses and applications – Nuclear Excavation
2729How did they plant the nuclear devices? They drilled a hole in bottom of the elevator shafts of the WTC and lowered the nuclear device into the drilled hole. They used oil rig drilling type equipment to drill the hole to the required depth wherein the nuclear detonation can excavate the WTC and yet produce very little nuclear radiation fallout. Proceed to time stamp 10:00 to see this being done in Operation Plowshare. Time stamp 11:30 shows them lowering the small nuclear device into the drilled hole.
2730The elevator shafts were intentionally selected to channel the nuclear explosion and intense steel melting heat. The elevator shafts were used like a chimney – to control the detonation and demolition, to create a heat sink using the steel structure of the elevator shaft, to cause the nuclear fission of the steel, to cause an implosion and to vent the intense heat and flash upwards through the center of the building and out of view.
2731Concrete evidence of nuclear detonations at WTC on 9/11
2732Many have wondered what caused the steel beams of the World Trade Center Towers to instantly disintegrate? Instantaneous rusting effect of a nuclear detonation explains this. Add the amount of heat generated by a nuclear detonation and you have an instantaneous vaporization of all material (steel beams, concrete, glass, sheet metal, desks, phones, computers, papers and people) within the epicentre of the blast (ground zero). Cast iron melts at approximately 1,375 °C (2,507 °F). It’s boiling point is about 2862 °C (5182 °F). The heat inside a nuclear explosion can reach millions of degrees Fahrenheit – between 50 and 150 million degrees Fahrenheit.
2733Nuclear detonation instantaneous rust effect at ground zero New York City
2734 
2735 
2736The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (seen above walking past burned out vehicles) were immediately on scene in a supporting response and recovery role in New York City following the thermal nuclear attacks.
2737 
2738 
2739The intense flash heat generated by the nuclear detonations caused vehicles around ground zero to ignite. The WTC fires were all on the floors high above ground yet everywhere around ground zero, vehicles were photographed burned out. The heat was so intense that rubber tires evaporated.
2740 
2741 
2742Notice that the fire truck wasn’t hit by debris from the nuclear excavation of the WTC Towers. It was parked beside a building that is still standing. Windows in the building have not been blown out. The front tires are completely gone while the rear tires remain. Dust could not melt the tires. A nuclear detonation heat and shockwave does this type of damage.
2743 
2744 
2745Short URL: http://presscore.ca/?p=68
274610 Comments for “Concrete evidence shows US government nuked New York City on 9/11”
27471.	PC
2748December 4, 2012 - 7:01 PM
2749FAIR USE NOTICE: The above videos and/or images may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 106A-117 of the U.S. Copyright Law.
27502.	PC
2751September 22, 2012 - 3:02 PM
2752File # 2121224885
27533.	PC
2754May 25, 2012 - 2:23 PM
2755Can’t accept the notion that the US government would use nukes against its own people, on US soil. How quickly you forget that the US government is the only government in the World to actually use nuclear bombs against civilian cities. The civilian population of Nagasaki and Hiroshima were their first thermal nuclear bomb victims. Japan was in the process of surrendering when US president Harry S. Truman (33rd President of the United States from 1945–1953) ordered them nuked.
2756The U.S. has since carried out 1,030 nuclear weapons tests. The Soviet Union: 715 tests. France: 210 tests. Britain: 45 tests. China: 43 tests.
2757Since 16 July 1945, when the U.S. exploded the first nuclear bomb, codenamed ‘Trinity’ at Alamogordo, New Mexico there have been 2,044 tests worldwide.
2758Nuclear weapon test explosions have been carried out in all environments: above ground, underground, and underwater. They have occurred on top of towers, onboard barges, suspended from balloons, on the earth’s surface, underwater to depths of 2,000 feet, underground to depths of more than 8,000 feet, and in horizontal tunnels. Test bombs also have been dropped by aircraft and fired by rockets up to 200 miles into the atmosphere.
2759The US has detonated hundreds of nuclear bombs on US soil since 1945. In Nevada, Alamogordo, New Mexico; Carlsbad, New Mexico; Hattiesberg, Mississippi; Grand Valley, Colorado; Rifle, Colorado; Farmington, New Mexico; Hot Creek Valley, Central Nevada; Fallon, Nevada and; Amchitka, Alaska. All in close proximity to civilian populated cities, towns and villages.
2760Of the 2,044 nuclear weapons tests worldwide, there have been 711 in the atmosphere or underwater: 215 by the U.S., 207 by the Soviet Union, 21 by Britain, 45 by France and, 23 by China.
2761It is estimated that the total yield of all the atmospheric nuclear weapons tests conducted is 438 megatons. That’s equivalent to 29,200 Hiroshima size bombs. In the 36 years between 1945 and 1980 when atmospheric testing was being conducted this would have been equivalent to exploding a Hiroshima size bomb in the atmosphere every 11 hours. Some 4,200 kilograms of plutonium has been discharged into the atmosphere as a result of atmospheric nuclear testing.
2762All of the US nuclear bomb detonations, on US soil since 1945, have caused massive amounts of radiation (fallout) to leak into the environment. Large areas of land are uninhabitable as a result of atmospheric and underground nuclear testing. The civilian population living in close proximity to these, on US soil nuclear detonations have and are still suffering from the adverse effects of nuclear radiation exposure. The US people, their children and their children’s children’s health and livelihoods have been affected by all of these nuclear weapons tests.
27639/11 wasn’t just another nuclear weapons test. It was an intentional and deliberate thermal nuclear bomb attack, by the US government, on US soil and against the United States and its people.
27644.	Paul W Kincaid
2765May 23, 2012 - 11:29 AM
2766Foreign terrorists and hijackers didn’t attack the US on September 11, 2001 and bring down the World Trade Center Towers – the U.S. government did that using remote controlled military aircraft and planted tactical nukes.
2767Terrorists didn’t take away the freedom, liberty and justice of the American people – the U.S. government did that.
2768Terrorists didn’t draw up the Patriot Act, create the Department of Homeland Security, spy illegally on Americans, launch 3 unprovoked armed attacks against 3 foreign states, abolish habeas corpus, kidnap, deport, torture and murder U.S. and foreign civilians – the U.S. government did that.
2769Terrorists didn’t loot $trillions from US Federal Tax Revenue and give it to the Wall Street bankers – the U.S. government did that.
2770Terrorists didn’t bankrupt the U.S. – the U.S. government did that.
2771Terrorists didn’t create the $15.6 trillion national debt – the U.S. government did that ($13 trillion added by just the last 4 of the 44 presidents of the United States – George HW Bush, Bill Clinton, George W Bush and Barrack Obama – Obama added $5 trillion in just 3 years, George W Bush added $5 trillion over 2 terms, Bill and Hillary Clinton added $1.5 trillion, George HW Bush added $1.5 trillion) .
2772Terrorists didn’t force millions of Americans out of work and onto the street – the U.S. government did that.
2773Terrorists didn’t develop and release the Avian Flu and the Swine Flu – the U.S. government did that.
2774Terrorists didn’t drop nuclear bombs on civilian cities – the U.S. government did that.
2775Terrorists didn’t murder 3 million civilians in Iraq – the U.S. government did that.
2776Now tell me who is a greater threat to the American people and to the World – a phantom terrorist group called al Qaeda or the U.S. government? Tell me why would you travel thousands of miles to a foreign country to fight and even give your life to protect and restore their rights and freedoms when your own rights and freedoms are being stripped away at home, on US soil, by your government? Who is a greater threat to mankind? Those who have used nukes against foreign and US civilian cities or those seeking to develop nuclear energy.
2777The American people went off to war to remove by force the leadership of foreign states that were allegedly a threat to their own people and to mankind. The US government justified their murder of those leaders by claiming they eliminated the threat they posed to the US and to the World. However, after the fact, the evidence showed that none posed any imminent or future threat to their people or to any other foreign state. In fact, the evidence clearly shows the World that it is the US leadership who are the greatest threat to mankind and to the American people. Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Somalia, and Iran have not and have never attacked the US. It was and is the US government who has attacked or is planning to wage war with Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Somalia, and Iran. The US government is the only leadership in the World to use nukes against civilian cities – not just once but 4 times and twice against it own people, on US soil.
27785.	PC
2779May 22, 2012 - 9:22 PM
2780The following video presents more evidence of a nuclear detonation on September 11, 2001. The video was taken of the Upshot-Knothole Grable 15 kilotons nuclear weapons test on May 25, 1953. The first artillery fired atomic projectile (AFAP) test. The same shock wave effects of this nuclear explosion were seen on September 11, 2001. Metal instantly turning into rust – time stamp starting 0:20. Condensation forms on the underside of sheet metal as a result of the very rapid heat transfer by nuclear detonation radiation. Since a nuclear detonation generates heat of 500 million degrees Fahrenheit this condensation will cause the metal to instantly corrode and rust.
2781Other nuclear detonation signature effects that were seen on 9/11 include – Base surge (a dust cloud which rolls out from the bottom of the column produced by a subsurface burst of a nuclear weapon) expanding outwardly from ground zero. Vertical bursts shooting thousands of feet upwardly until gravity causes them to fall back to earth.
27826.	PC
2783May 17, 2012 - 1:30 PM
2784On September 11, personnel at the NORAD operations center in Cheyenne Mountain, Colorado, were participating in the training exercise Vigilant Guardian, which has been described as a “full-blown nuclear war” exercise.
2785Immediately following the false flag attacks, installations around the world were placed on the highest state of alert, known as Force Protection Condition Delta (FPCON Delta). Soon after that, the defense readiness condition was raised to Defcon 3, the highest level since 1973. News of the increased defense readiness condition was soon communicated within NORAD, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld notified President Bush of the raised threat level. The military stayed at Defcon 3 until September 14, when the defense readiness condition was lowered one notch, to Defcon 4.
2786At Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana, according to journalists Eric Schmitt and Thom Shanker, air crews taking part in the exercise were “pulling nuclear bombs and missiles out of their heavily guarded storage sites and loading them aboard B-52s” on the morning of September 11. Real, live nuclear weapons were being used, but “their triggers were not armed.”
2787American History magazine described the scene at the base: “Even though it was only a drill, the command center was tense, everyone proceeding as if the planes would soon take off on bombing runs, instead of just idling at the end of the runway.” Then, at precisely 9:00 a.m. (Eastern time), “an alarm sounded across the base and the crews raced to their planes.” After news was received about the terrorist attacks in New York, the base’s command staff “ended the drill, but left the fueled and armed planes where they were.”
2788Also as part of Global Guardian, three E-4B National Airborne Operations Center planes that were based at Offutt Air Force Base were airborne on September 11. The E-4B, nicknamed the “Doomsday” plane during the Cold War, is a militarized version of a Boeing 747-200. It is equipped with advanced communications equipment, and in times of national emergency can act as an alternative command post from which top government officials can direct forces, execute war orders, and coordinate actions by civil authorities. Even after Global Guardian was terminated, the three E-4Bs remained in the air.
2789Why nuclear war exercises on September, 11, 2001? Using tactical nukes to bring down buildings was never tried before. If something went wrong the nuclear blast could have potentially destroyed the entire Lower Manhattan complex and 2 could have potentially wiped out New York City. If the nuclear detonations were just confined to pulling the World Trade Center towers the fictional enemy al Qaeda would be (and were) blamed. If the detonations destroyed New York City, with mass causalities, Russia was to be blamed for the US government’s false flag attack against its own country and its own people.
2790On 9/11 the US government used tactical nukes in false flag attacks against New York City. There were no hijackers. No American Airlines jets flew into the World Trade Center Towers or the Pentagon or crashed in a field. Civilian aircraft were forced to land at secured military airstrips and military aircraft were remotely flown into the World Trade Centers. And as Donald Rumsfeld stated “a missile hit the Pentagon” – launched from another military aircraft that flew over the Pentagon.
2791Witnesses reported seeing a jet liner approaching the Pentagon on the morning of September 11, 2001 and appeared to crash into it but actually overflew the building. Runway 15 of Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport is just on the other side of the Pentagon that was hit by a missile. The ILS (instrument landing system) for runway 15 of Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport passes directly over the Pentagon.
2792At 9:06 a.m, September 11, 2001 air traffic controllers at Washington’s Reagan National Airport are instructed to start securing the airspace around Washington, DC. The controllers had just heard about two aircraft hitting the World Trade Center. They are told to turn away all non-airliner aircraft, such as private planes, as these are considered high risk.
2793Radar data showed two unidentified military aircraft (call signs “Bobcat 14” and “Bobcat 17” originated out of Dover Air Force Base in Delaware) flying “in trail” (in single file, with one aircraft directly behind the other) at 21,000 feet, and are overhead during the last few minutes that the missile is airborne – before it hits the Pentagon at 9:37 a.m.
2794http://media.nara.gov/9-11/MFR/t-0148-911MFR-00245.pdf “Controllers from BWI were working the two “Bobcats” and needed vectors from National controllers. It appeared from the logs that the Bobcats departed in front of Flight 77…”
2795According to evidence given at the 9/11 Commission Report there was a manned air traffic control Tower at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, manned by military personnel (not FAA). The ATC is just left of the missile impact site.
27967.	PC
2797May 11, 2012 - 9:11 AM
2798 
2799On the morning of December 1, 1984, a remotely controlled (UAV) Boeing 720 transport took off from Edwards Air Force Base (Edwards, California), made a left-hand departure and climbed to an altitude of 2300 feet. It then began a descent-to-landing to a specially prepared runway on the east side of Rogers Dry Lake. Final approach was along the roughly 3.8-degree glide slope. The landing gear was left retracted. Passing the decision height of 150 feet above ground level (AGL), the aircraft was slightly to the right of the desired path. Just above that decision point at which the pilot was to execute a “go-around,” there appeared to be enough altitude to maneuver back to the centerline of the runway. Data acquisition systems had been activated, and the aircraft was committed to impact. It contacted the ground, left wing low. The fire and smoke took over an hour to extinguish.
2800This flight, called the Controlled Impact Demonstration (CID), was the culmination of more than a year of preparation in a joint research project by NASA and the FAA.
2801The joint research project by NASA and the FAA successfully taxied, took off, flew and landed a Boeing 720 aircraft remotely. On December 1, 1984, NASA research pilot Fitzhugh (Fitz) Fulton remotely flew and crashed landed the unmanned and empty Boeing 720 aircraft from the NASA Dryden Remotely Controlled Vehicle Facility. Prior to December 1, 1984, the Boeing 720 was flown on 14 practice flights with safety pilots on board. During the 14 flights, there were 16 hours and 22 minutes of remotely piloted vehicle control, including 10 remotely piloted take offs, 69 remotely piloted vehicle controlled approaches, and 13 remotely piloted vehicle landings on abort runway.
2802Source – http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/Gallery/Movie/CID/
2803The significance of these NASA / FAA tests proves that the US government had the technological means and know-how to remotely control and fly unmanned Boeing aircrafts into the World Trade Center Towers.
28048.	Paul W Kincaid
2805May 11, 2012 - 9:03 AM
2806 
2807How were they able to fly a Boeing aircraft into the World Trade Center Towers. The Boeing KC-767 aircraft were outfitted with a targeting pod. The Boeing KC-767 is used by the US military to refuel other jet aircraft in flight. It has rails on the forward belly of the aircraft where a targeting pod and bomb or missile can be mounted. Click on image above for enlarged view.
2808 
2809A targeting pod is a long-range precision targeting system that supports strike missions by providing positive target identification, autonomous tracking, coordinate generation and accurate weapons guidance from extended standoff ranges. A targeting pod guided the Boeing aircraft into the World Trade Center Towers. From the ground, an experienced UAV operator could take off, fly and crash the Boeing aircraft into the World Trade Center. The targeting pod turned the Boeing KC-767 aircraft into a guided missile.
28109/11 investigators couldn’t figure out what the bulge was on the underbelly of the aircraft that flew into the World Trade Center. Just before impact a flash appeared to be seen coming from the belly of the aircraft. The targeting pod contains a high-resolution, forward-looking infrared (FLIR) sensor that displays an infrared image of the target to the aircrew. The pod also contains a CCD camera used to obtain target imagery in the visible portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. An on-gimbal inertial navigation sensor establishes line-of-sight and automatic boresighting capability. All this allows an UAV operator to see exactly where he or she is flying the UAV aircraft. The pod is also equipped with a laser designator for precise delivery of laser-guided munitions. The laser rangefinder created the flash just before the Boeing KC-767 impact.
2811The research and development of the LITENING targeting pod began at Rafael Advanced Defense Systems’ Missiles Division in Israel, with subsequent completion of LITENING I for use by the Israeli Air Force. In 1995 Northrop Grumman Corporation’s teamed with Rafael for further development and sales of the LITENING pod. Northrop Grumman Corporation made improvements on the “Basic Pod” including a third generation FLIR, laser marker and software upgrades (LITENING II) which was fielded beginning in 1999 – 2 years before 9/11 under the Clinton administration.
2812 
28139.	PC
2814May 10, 2012 - 10:00 PM
2815Remember CIA operative Valerie Plame? On July 14, 2003, Washington Times journalist Robert Novak, ended Valerie Plame’s career with the CIA by revealing in his column her identity as a CIA operative.
2816Legal documents published in the course of the CIA leak grand jury investigation, United States v. Libby, and Congressional investigations, establish her classified employment as a covert officer for the CIA at the time that Novak’s column was published in July 2003.
2817She was working for the CIA at the same time as Susan Lindauer was. Both were working on very high profile CIA projects relating to Iraq. Lindauer worked closely with the Iraqi government before 9/11 and she could prove that Iraq had no WMDs and had no intentions of acquiring WMDs. Plame, on the other hand, was working on providing the US government with a pretext for war – linking Iraq with WMDs. Because Lindauer was anti-war she was arrested and discredited – mentally ill. Plame was pro-war and she received the full support of the US government for her support of their wars of aggression agenda.
281810.	PC
2819May 10, 2012 - 6:30 AM
2820CIA asset, and author of the book “Extreme Prejudice” Susan Lindauer revealed in a video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68LUHa_-OlA&feature=related that she was warned by her CIA handler, Richard Fuisz, to stay away from New York City – time stamp starting 0:25:20 “do not go back to New York City. It’s too dangerous. We are expecting the use of a miniature thermal nuclear device.”
2821Time stap 0:32:36 “It is a special military grade weapon… it is not something you could make ever in your kitchen, or garage or your living room.” she states. – i.e. a nuclear bomb.
2822Since then she has been arrested and charged under The unPatriot Act but she never went to trial. In 2003 she was accused of conspiring to act as an unregistered lobbyist for the Iraqi Intelligence Service and engaging in prohibited financial transactions with the government of Iraq under Saddam Hussein. The government silenced her by having the court declare her mentally incompetent to stand trial. Lindauer was found mentally unfit to stand trial in two separate hearings and all charges were dropped in 2009.
2823Lindauer is the daughter of John Howard Lindauer II, the newspaper publisher and former Republican nominee for Governor of Alaska. Lindauer is also a second cousin of George W Bush’s former White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card. Card served as U.S. Secretary of Transportation under President George H. W. Bush. On September 11, 2001, it was Card who whispered in Bush’s ear while the President was conducting an education event at Emma E. Booker Elementary School in Sarasota, Florida that a second aircraft had crashed into the World Trade Center.
2824In May of 2000 CIA agent Richard Fuisz was gagged by the US government for informing then US congressional aide Susan Lindauer, that he knew the identities of the Lockerbie bombers and they were not Libyan.
2825 
2826You must be logged in to post a comment Login
2827
2828http://presscore.ca/concrete-evidence-shows-us-government-nuked-new-york-city-on-911.html