0dESCiHG

1Skip to ContentSkip to Wiki NavigationSkip to Site Navigation
2Games
3Movies
4TV
5Wikis
6
7Search
8
9Stevoawesome
10START A WIKI
11 DPP Wiki
12On the Wiki
13Wiki Activity
14Random page
15Videos
16Images
17Episodes
18People
19Community
20 Contribute  
21General Discussion's wall > Should Gubra Lagima and The Door Handler Remain as Bureaucrats?	(Deleted)
22The Gerudo Dragon
23The Gerudo Dragon deleted this thread because:
24No longer needed
2500:27, March 3, 2016	Restore Thread
26 The Gerudo Dragon
27Following 2 Kudos	 
28Should Gubra Lagima and The Door Handler Remain as Bureaucrats?
29The Gerudo Dragon 
30No: They should be demoted by Wikia.
31
32Yes: They should remain on the DP Wiki
33
34
35
36Feel free to include further reasoning
3703:28, February 28, 2016
38 Eggs Rank
393 Kudos	 
40Eggs Rank 
41No Bann him
4203:29, February 28, 2016
43 The Door Handler
44 
45The Door Handler 
46We haven't broken any Wikia rules,you guys have blantantly gone against everything Ducksoup has said so Yes.
4703:31, February 28, 2016
48 Gubra Lagima
49 
50Gubra Lagima 
51No: Gubra Lagima is being threatened with sexual assault by Bryan "Sword of Storms." Nobody should remain on a wiki that condones sexual assault.
52Screenshot 36463543525235
5303:32, February 28, 2016
54 Stevoawesome
553 Kudos	 
56Stevoawesome 
57No: They should be demoted by Wikia.
58
59They have been making edits that go against the views and spirit of the wiki and the owner and staff of the wiki want them gone. Even TJ from the Drunken Peasants himself said they need to go.
6003:33, February 28, 2016
61 SwordofStorms
622 Kudos	 
63SwordofStorms 
64OH HELL NO!
65
66https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9o19CaOSuD8
6703:34, February 28, 2016
68 Gubra Lagima
69 
70Gubra Lagima 
71reply to #6
72SwordofStorms wrote:
73OH HELL NO!
74https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9o19CaOSuD8
75Screenshot 3646354345345
76
7703:38, February 28, 2016
78 The Door Handler
79 
80The Door Handler 
81reply to #7
82Gubra Lagima wrote:
83SwordofStorms wrote:
84OH HELL NO!
85https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9o19CaOSuD8
86Screenshot 3646354345345
87
88"United States"
89
90DOXX
9103:39, February 28, 2016
92 Gubra Lagima
93 
94Gubra Lagima 
95Let's dispel once and for all with this fiction that Bryan doesn't know what he's doing. He knows EXACTLY what he's doing. Bryan is undertaking a systematic effort to change this wiki, to make it more like the rest of Wikia. That's why he is starting this rape culture. It is a systematic effort to change the wiki. Liam is going to leave our children with what they deserve: the single greatest wiki in the history of the world.
9603:40, February 28, 2016
97 PaulsEgo
985 Kudos	 
99PaulsEgo 
100I love this wiki. I see no reason why someone who clearly hates the show whould want to be an admin on a fan wiki, or why people would want him there -other than to fuck the place up.
10103:46, February 28, 2016
102 Gubra Lagima
103 
104Gubra Lagima 
105reply to #10
106PaulsEgo wrote:
107I love this wiki. I see no reason why someone who clearly hates the show whould want to be an admin on a fan wiki, or why people would want him there -other than to fuck the place up.
108Let's dispel once and for all with this fiction that Paul can't drive across Phoenix in an hour. He knows EXACTLY how big Phoenix is. Gubra is undertaking a systematic effort to change the size of Phoenix, to make it more like Los Angeles. That's why he is sspreading these lies. Paul is going to leave our children with what they deserve: the single smallest Phoenix, Arizona in the history of the world.
10903:48, February 28, 2016
110 Some Horrible Schmuck
1111 Kudos	 
112Some Horrible Schmuck 
113I stand proudly by Gubra and Door Handler as this is an abuse of wikia power to silence dissent.
11403:49, February 28, 2016
115 The Door Handler
116 
117The Door Handler 
118Screenshot 2016-02-28-03-51-30
119http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Mira_Laime/How_to_Deal_With_a_Bad_Bureaucrat?
120If the bureaucrat in question or anyone else interferes with the voting in any way, please ask Wikia staff atSpecial:Contact for help.
12103:52, February 28, 2016
122 Sinistra Henry Hades
1232 Kudos	 
124Sinistra Henry Hades 
125GubraLogic
126This picture details my main criticism of Gubra. I know that it is not the only issue people have with him, but it is the one that I find completely unacceptable. I vote no.
12703:53, February 28, 2016
128 Stevoawesome
129 
130Stevoawesome 
131You have already voiced your opinion. All those other posts are just useless spam.
13203:53, February 28, 2016
133 Eggs Rank
134 
135Eggs Rank 
136reply to #13
137The Door Handler wrote:
138Screenshot 2016-02-28-03-51-30
139http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Mira_Laime/How_to_Deal_With_a_Bad_Bureaucrat?
140If the bureaucrat in question or anyone else interferes with the voting in any way, please ask Wikia staff atSpecial:Contact for help.
141You are spamming the thread and is doxxing and posting info about SOS.
14203:56, February 28, 2016
143Quote More  
144 The Door Handler
145 
146The Door Handler 
147"Interferes" "In any way". This includes deletion of our comments.
14803:57, February 28, 2016
149 The Door Handler
150 
151The Door Handler 
152We were not spamming or doxxing. Our comments never mentioned who's Skype that was.
15303:59, February 28, 2016
154 Some Horrible Schmuck
155 
156Some Horrible Schmuck 
157I'd also add the only person guilty of the rule breaking prescribed to Gubra and DH have all been committed in the past by Eggs Rank.
158
159If anyone should be demoted, it's him for abusing his powers.
16004:00, February 28, 2016
161 Gubra Lagima
162 
163Gubra Lagima 
164Eggs Rank posted Vigilant Christian and Vegan Gains' IP addresses in the chat months ago. I wanted to ban him permanently, but the other staff wouldn't allow it. This is the culture of doxxing that Gerudo Dragon approves and oversees every single day.
16504:03, February 28, 2016
166 Some Horrible Schmuck
167 
168Some Horrible Schmuck 
169Let's dispel once and for all with this fiction that Eggs doesn't know what he's doing. He knows EXACTLY what he's doing. Eggs is undertaking a systematic effort to change this wiki, to make it more like Wikia. That's why he is spreading these lies. Door Handler is going to leave our children with what they deserve: the best and most powerful wiki in the history of Wikia.
170Edited by Some Horrible Schmuck	04:05, February 28, 2016
171 The Door Handler
172 
173The Door Handler 
174Eggs Rank has also demoted and banned users this past week for no reason including myself.
175Screenshot 2016-02-25-15-48-04
176Screenshot 2016-02-27-18-42-05
17704:06, February 28, 2016
178 Some Horrible Schmuck
179 
180Some Horrible Schmuck 
181I too was banned by Eggs this week. His reasons were completely arbitrary and only served to justify silencing me.
182Edited by Some Horrible Schmuck	04:08, February 28, 2016
183 Eggs Rank
184 
185Eggs Rank 
186Uh DH you banned me for a year for being rude.
18704:10, February 28, 2016
188 Some Horrible Schmuck
189 
190Some Horrible Schmuck 
191Eggs Ban
19204:13, February 28, 2016
193 The Door Handler
194 
195The Door Handler 
196You used profanity and racism. I was well within my rights to do so. You banned Schmuck and Xyele for no reason, given that they hadn't posted in weeks.
19704:13, February 28, 2016
198 Gubra Lagima
199 
200Gubra Lagima 
201In addition to being demoted by Eggs this week with no justification,  he reverted several substantive edits of mine, also without justification or explanation. He is demonstrating all of the symptoms of a "bad bureaucrat."
202Screenshot 9673472w6
203File:Screenshot 67357.png
20404:14, February 28, 2016
205 Eggs Rank
206 
207Eggs Rank 
208You were adding false information and making edits that every admin except Gubra and DH disaprove of.
20904:15, February 28, 2016
210 Crazypayne93
2111 Kudos	 
212Crazypayne93 
213HEEEEEEEEEELLL NO
214
215[1]
21604:15, February 28, 2016
217 The Door Handler
218 
219The Door Handler 
220Find the false information Schmuck added. No basis in reality. Within the day before he was banned.
22104:16, February 28, 2016
222 Gubra Lagima
223 
224Gubra Lagima 
225None of us added false information to my knowledge. You have doxed public figures, banned people without justification, and done just about everything else a bad bureaucrat would do. You were demoted for a long time due to the IP address dox when the wiki was under my supervision, but clearly you have not learned your lesson. You continue to exhibit unacceptable behavior, and 99.9% of wikis would have banned you long ago.
22604:17, February 28, 2016
227 Some Horrible Schmuck
228 
229Some Horrible Schmuck 
230reply to #28
231Eggs Rank wrote: You were adding false information and making edits that every admin except Gubra and DH disaprove of.
232No. That's not why you did it. You specifically designated the ban for "inserting false information". I did no such thing. Everything I've posted has either been entirely factually accurate when it is needed or up to opinion/satire when it is needed.
23304:17, February 28, 2016
234 Some Horrible Schmuck
235 
236Some Horrible Schmuck 
237What does it say about a wiki that the innocent are hanged for crimes they are accused of just because of political dissention and inflated claims, but the figure of most guilt leads the charge to persecution and faces no repercussions for his violations?
23804:21, February 28, 2016
239 The Door Handler
240 
241The Door Handler 
242reply to #29
243Crazypayne93 wrote:
244HEEEEEEEEEELLL NO
245[1]
246"Once a good part of your community's active users voted"
247
248You haven't been active in 6 months so this vote is illegible due to your inactivity.
249Screenshot 2016-02-28-04-22-56
25004:22, February 28, 2016
251 Gubra Lagima
252 
253Gubra Lagima 
254I thought that everyone in the western world learned that mob rule does not work after the horrors of the French Revolution. Seems like this wiki is still living in the 19th century
25504:23, February 28, 2016
256 Some Horrible Schmuck
257 
258Some Horrible Schmuck 
259Mob rule > Wikia Guidelines
260
261Is that the precedents you all are setting for yourselves?
262Edited by Some Horrible Schmuck	04:27, February 28, 2016
263 Crazypayne93
264 
265Crazypayne93 
266reply to #34
267The Door Handler wrote:
268Crazypayne93 wrote:
269HEEEEEEEEEELLL NO
270[1]
271"Once a good part of your community's active users voted" You haven't been active in 6 months so this vote is illegible due to your inactivity.
272Screenshot 2016-02-28-04-22-56
273
274
275
276
277Well, I'm sorry that my life doesn't revolve around the damn wiki.
27804:27, February 28, 2016
279 Gubra Lagima
280 
281Gubra Lagima 
282reply to #37
283Crazypayne93 wrote:
284The Door Handler wrote:
285Crazypayne93 wrote:
286HEEEEEEEEEELLL NO
287[1]
288"Once a good part of your community's active users voted" You haven't been active in 6 months so this vote is illegible due to your inactivity.
289Screenshot 2016-02-28-04-22-56
290
291
292
293Well, I'm sorry that my life doesn't revolve around the damn wiki.
294Clearly our detractors are bringing inactive users to the wiki through a third party communications app, possibly Skype. The aim is clearly to have us banned through illegitimate means. This entire event can and must be considered null and void if this is the case.
29504:31, February 28, 2016
296 Sharkfang
2971 Kudos	 
298Sharkfang 
299reply to #37
300Crazypayne93 wrote:
301The Door Handler wrote:
302Crazypayne93 wrote:
303HEEEEEEEEEELLL NO
304[1]
305"Once a good part of your community's active users voted" You haven't been active in 6 months so this vote is illegible due to your inactivity.
306Screenshot 2016-02-28-04-22-56
307
308
309
310Well, I'm sorry that my life doesn't revolve around the damn wiki.
311And mine doesn't as well anymore, but based on my past experience here and scrolling through the stuff going on very recently for the past hour after being told about it by someone, I vote no.
312
313(And no, I'm not coming back, and yes, I know this will create drama, but I've got to do what I've got to do.)
31404:34, February 28, 2016
315 Some Horrible Schmuck
316 
317Some Horrible Schmuck 
318This is a faux vote. A mere façade to justify a decision the elite have already prescribed! And while I have the floor,
319
320Let's dispel once and for all with this fiction that EggHead doesn't know what he's doing. He knows EXACTLY what he's doing. EggHead is undertaking a systematic effort to change this wiki, to make it more like Wikia. That's why he is spreading these lies. Gubra is going to leave our children with what they deserve: the best and most powerful wiki in the history of Wikia.
32104:34, February 28, 2016
322 Gubra Lagima
323 
324Gubra Lagima 
325reply to #39
326Sharkfang wrote:
327Crazypayne93 wrote:
328The Door Handler wrote:
329Crazypayne93 wrote:
330HEEEEEEEEEELLL NO
331[1]
332"Once a good part of your community's active users voted"You haven't been active in 6 months so this vote is illegible due to your inactivity.
333Screenshot 2016-02-28-04-22-56
334
335
336Well, I'm sorry that my life doesn't revolve around the damn wiki.
337And mine doesn't as well anymore, but based on my past experience here and scrolling through the stuff going on very recently for the past hour after being told about it by someone, I vote no.
338(And no, I'm not coming back, and yes, I know this will create drama, but I've got to do what I've got to do.)
339More long-inactive users who inexplicably know about this referendum and are conveniently reappearing. This is an illegitimate sham, and I will not stand for it.
34004:36, February 28, 2016
341 SwordofStorms
342 
343SwordofStorms 
344reply to #41
345Gubra Lagima wrote:
346Sharkfang wrote:
347Crazypayne93 wrote:
348The Door Handler wrote:
349Crazypayne93 wrote:
350HEEEEEEEEEELLL NO
351[1]
352"Once a good part of your community's active users voted"You haven't been active in 6 months so this vote is illegible due to your inactivity.
353Screenshot 2016-02-28-04-22-56
354
355Well, I'm sorry that my life doesn't revolve around the damn wiki.
356And mine doesn't as well anymore, but based on my past experience here and scrolling through the stuff going on very recently for the past hour after being told about it by someone, I vote no.
357(And no, I'm not coming back, and yes, I know this will create drama, but I've got to do what I've got to do.)
358More long-inactive users who inexplicably know about this referendum and are conveniently reappearing. This is an illegitimate sham, and I will not stand for it.
359Where did they say that it had to be active users fam? Just members of the community, which they are are were.
36004:37, February 28, 2016
361 Crazypayne93
362 
363Crazypayne93 
364reply to #39
365Sharkfang wrote:
366Crazypayne93 wrote:
367The Door Handler wrote:
368Crazypayne93 wrote:
369HEEEEEEEEEELLL NO
370[1]
371"Once a good part of your community's active users voted"You haven't been active in 6 months so this vote is illegible due to your inactivity.
372Screenshot 2016-02-28-04-22-56
373
374
375Well, I'm sorry that my life doesn't revolve around the damn wiki.
376And mine doesn't as well anymore, but based on my past experience here and scrolling through the stuff going on very recently for the past hour after being told about it by someone, I vote no.
377(And no, I'm not coming back, and yes, I know this will create drama, but I've got to do what I've got to do.)
378
379
380Epic clap is epic
38104:37, February 28, 2016
382 The Door Handler
383 
384The Door Handler 
385reply to #42
386SwordofStorms wrote:
387Gubra Lagima wrote:
388Sharkfang wrote:
389Crazypayne93 wrote:
390The Door Handler wrote:
391Crazypayne93 wrote:
392HEEEEEEEEEELLL NO
393[1]
394"Once a good part of your community's active users voted"You haven't been active in 6 months so this vote is illegible due to your inactivity.
395Screenshot 2016-02-28-04-22-56
396
397Well, I'm sorry that my life doesn't revolve around the damn wiki.
398And mine doesn't as well anymore, but based on my past experience here and scrolling through the stuff going on very recently for the past hour after being told about it by someone, I vote no.
399(And no, I'm not coming back, and yes, I know this will create drama, but I've got to do what I've got to do.)
400More long-inactive users who inexplicably know about this referendum and are conveniently reappearing. This is an illegitimate sham, and I will not stand for it.
401Where did they say that it had to be active users fam? Just members of the community, which they are are were.
402http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Mira_Laime/How_to_Deal_With_a_Bad_Bureaucrat?
403
404 "part of your community's active users voted"
40504:41, February 28, 2016
406 SwordofStorms
407 
408SwordofStorms 
409reply to #44
410The Door Handler wrote:
411SwordofStorms wrote:
412Gubra Lagima wrote:
413Sharkfang wrote:
414Crazypayne93 wrote:
415The Door Handler wrote:
416Crazypayne93 wrote:
417HEEEEEEEEEELLL NO
418[1]
419"Once a good part of your community's active users voted"You haven't been active in 6 months so this vote is illegible due to your inactivity.
420Screenshot 2016-02-28-04-22-56
421
422Well, I'm sorry that my life doesn't revolve around the damn wiki.
423And mine doesn't as well anymore, but based on my past experience here and scrolling through the stuff going on very recently for the past hour after being told about it by someone, I vote no.
424(And no, I'm not coming back, and yes, I know this will create drama, but I've got to do what I've got to do.)
425More long-inactive users who inexplicably know about this referendum and are conveniently reappearing. This is an illegitimate sham, and I will not stand for it.
426Where did they say that it had to be active users fam? Just members of the community, which they are are were.
427http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Mira_Laime/How_to_Deal_With_a_Bad_Bureaucrat?
428 "part of your community's active users voted"
429Okay, even if their votes don't count, we're still winning by a fair margine. 3v5.
43004:44, February 28, 2016
431 Stevoawesome
432 
433Stevoawesome 
434http://drunken-peasants-podcast.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:22678
43504:45, February 28, 2016
436 Gubra Lagima
437 
438Gubra Lagima 
439We have no idea who voted on this poll. Any of you could have used sock accounts to vote multiple times, or brought in more inactive users to sway the vote. This is an absolute miscarriage of justice.
44004:45, February 28, 2016
441 SwordofStorms
442 
443SwordofStorms 
444reply to #47
445Gubra Lagima wrote:
446We have no idea who voted on this poll. Any of you could have used sock accounts to vote multiple times, or brought in more inactive users to sway the vote. This is an absolute miscarriage of justice.
447Do you have a better way? Of doing it then?
44805:02, February 28, 2016
449 Gatack
450 
451Gatack 
452I would vote but I don't know who he is. I don't want to vote on something I'm i'll informed on.
45305:03, February 28, 2016
454 Gubra Lagima
455 
456Gubra Lagima 
457reply to #48
458SwordofStorms wrote:
459Gubra Lagima wrote:
460We have no idea who voted on this poll. Any of you could have used sock accounts to vote multiple times, or brought in more inactive users to sway the vote. This is an absolute miscarriage of justice.
461Do you have a better way? Of doing it then?
462A jury trial where the evidence is laid out in an objective manner and 6-12 members of an impartial third party decide whether we've broken any rules.
46305:05, February 28, 2016
464 Eggs Rank
465 
466Eggs Rank 
467reply to #50
468Gubra Lagima wrote:
469SwordofStorms wrote:
470Gubra Lagima wrote:
471We have no idea who voted on this poll. Any of you could have used sock accounts to vote multiple times, or brought in more inactive users to sway the vote. This is an absolute miscarriage of justice.
472Do you have a better way? Of doing it then?
473A jury trial where the evidence is laid out in an objective manner and 6-12 members of an impartial third party decide whether we've broken any rules.
474Fine. You can go on Drunken Recap and we'll bring 6 members of an impartial third party
47505:26, February 28, 2016
476 Gubra Lagima
477 
478Gubra Lagima 
479reply to #51
480Eggs Rank wrote:
481Gubra Lagima wrote:
482SwordofStorms wrote:
483Gubra Lagima wrote:
484We have no idea who voted on this poll. Any of you could have used sock accounts to vote multiple times, or brought in more inactive users to sway the vote. This is an absolute miscarriage of justice.
485Do you have a better way? Of doing it then?
486A jury trial where the evidence is laid out in an objective manner and 6-12 members of an impartial third party decide whether we've broken any rules.
487Fine. You can go on Drunken Recap and we'll bring 6 members of an impartial third party
488I'd rather be burned alive as a witch than go on your program.
48905:29, February 28, 2016
490 FalseShepherd
4911 Kudos	 
492FalseShepherd 
493Enough with this. Can everyone who the founder wants gone leave and make their own wiki so everyone can get back to editing and we don't have to deal with unproductive atmosphere being created right now?
49406:10, February 28, 2016
495 Gubra Lagima
496 
497Gubra Lagima 
498reply to #53
499FalseShepherd wrote:
500Enough with this. Can everyone who the founder wants gone leave and make their own wiki so everyone can get back to editing and we don't have to deal with unproductive atmosphere being created right now?
501I'm not the one creating the unproductive atmosphere. I was producing content, and then my edits began to be deleted by Gerudo and his cronies. I'm standing up for the principles that the wiki was initially based upon, even if nobody else will.
50206:12, February 28, 2016
503 FalseShepherd
504 
505FalseShepherd 
506reply to #10
507PaulsEgo wrote:
508I love this wiki. I see no reason why someone who clearly hates the show whould want to be an admin on a fan wiki, or why people would want him there -other than to fuck the place up.
509This goes to show that the very people this wiki is about do not approve of Gubra or DH being here. TJ doesn't want you here, he told me himself.
510
511Even Vadim Newquist has said that he doesn't approve of you being here.
512
513
514
515
516So can you just leave? Staying is completely counterproductive and the comment sections of these pills prove that
51706:16, February 28, 2016
518 Gubra Lagima
519 
520Gubra Lagima 
521reply to #55
522FalseShepherd wrote:
523PaulsEgo wrote:
524I love this wiki. I see no reason why someone who clearly hates the show whould want to be an admin on a fan wiki, or why people would want him there -other than to fuck the place up.
525This goes to show that the very people this wiki is about do not approve of Gubra or DH being here. TJ doesn't want you here, he told me himself.
526Even Vadim Newquist has said that he doesn't approve of you being here.
527
528
529
530
531So can you just leave? Staying is completely counterproductive and the comment sections of these pills prove that
532Let me propose a deal. I'll leave the wiki once Paul drives across Phoenix in an hour. Does that sound fair?
53306:18, February 28, 2016
534 FalseShepherd
535 
536FalseShepherd 
537reply to #54
538Gubra Lagima wrote:
539FalseShepherd wrote:
540Enough with this. Can everyone who the founder wants gone leave and make their own wiki so everyone can get back to editing and we don't have to deal with unproductive atmosphere being created right now?
541I'm not the one creating the unproductive atmosphere. I was producing content, and then my edits began to be deleted by Gerudo and his cronies. I'm standing up for the principles that the wiki was initially based upon, even if nobody else will.
542What the founder says goes, goes. The edits you've made were clearly not the ones anyone wanted. We're not pro-life, neither is DP, so don't write pro-life stuff. Simple
54306:19, February 28, 2016
544 Gubra Lagima
545 
546Gubra Lagima 
547reply to #57
548FalseShepherd wrote:
549Gubra Lagima wrote:
550FalseShepherd wrote:
551Enough with this. Can everyone who the founder wants gone leave and make their own wiki so everyone can get back to editing and we don't have to deal with unproductive atmosphere being created right now?
552I'm not the one creating the unproductive atmosphere. I was producing content, and then my edits began to be deleted by Gerudo and his cronies. I'm standing up for the principles that the wiki was initially based upon, even if nobody else will.
553What the founder says goes, goes. The edits you've made were clearly not the ones anyone wanted. We're not pro-life, neither is DP, so don't write pro-life stuff. Simple
554I'll stop writing pro-life stuff once Paul drives across Phoenix in an hour. Maybe he can rent a clown car and take the wiki staff with him. It can be a whole romantic getaway.
55506:20, February 28, 2016
556 Some Horrible Schmuck
557 
558Some Horrible Schmuck 
559Look False,
560
561You're a nice guy
562
563But you're an asshole
564
565You're fired
56606:32, February 28, 2016
567 Gubra Lagima
568 
569Gubra Lagima 
570Please False needs this job. False needs pizza time.
57106:33, February 28, 2016
572 Some Horrible Schmuck
573 
574Some Horrible Schmuck 
575Last chance
57606:35, February 28, 2016
577 Some Horrible Schmuck
578 
579Some Horrible Schmuck 
580GOOOOOOOOoooOOOOooooOOOOOOOOO
58106:36, February 28, 2016
582 Some Horrible Schmuck
583 
584Some Horrible Schmuck 
585False Shepherd
586
587Gubra has told me about you. He says you're brilliant. He also says you suck cock.
588
589Sucking cock isn't enough, young man. Cock sucking isn't a privilege, it's a gift. And you use it for the good of mankind.
59006:39, February 28, 2016
591 Gubra Lagima
592 
593Gubra Lagima 
594Schmick, you don't have the ass to justify this loan.
59506:41, February 28, 2016
596 Some Horrible Schmuck
597 
598Some Horrible Schmuck 
599Gubra, bring me a violin
60006:42, February 28, 2016
601 Gubra Lagima
602 
603Gubra Lagima 
604I'll give you 150
60506:44, February 28, 2016
606 Some Horrible Schmuck
607 
608Some Horrible Schmuck 
609300
61006:45, February 28, 2016
611 Gubra Lagima
612 
613Gubra Lagima 
614I'll give you 100
61506:47, February 28, 2016
616 Some Horrible Schmuck
617 
618Some Horrible Schmuck 
619300
62006:48, February 28, 2016
621 Gubra Lagima
622 
623Gubra Lagima 
624I'll give you 50
62506:50, February 28, 2016
626 Some Horrible Schmuck
627 
628Some Horrible Schmuck 
629300
63006:54, February 28, 2016
631 Gubra Lagima
632 
633Gubra Lagima 
634I'll give you cooked steak
63506:55, February 28, 2016
636 Some Horrible Schmuck
637 
638Some Horrible Schmuck 
639Gubra, every night. Until I find False IRL, it's 24/7//7/27/4/7
64006:58, February 28, 2016
641 Gubra Lagima
642 
643Gubra Lagima 
644He stole your frisbee
64506:59, February 28, 2016
646 Some Horrible Schmuck
647 
648Some Horrible Schmuck 
649I love my frisbee
65007:01, February 28, 2016
651 PaulsEgo
6522 Kudos	 
653PaulsEgo 
654Gubra, you admitted to me privately over a month ago that you no longer watch, enjoy, or care about the show. Given that fact, what relevant edits / content could you possibly adding to a wiki ABOUT THE FUCKING SHOW.
655
656Your edgy, unfunny, irrelevant comments here highlight this problem, and show you for what you are: a butthurt, whiney faggot who wont just leave because the negative attention you get here is better than the zero attention you'd garner elsewhere.
657
658Fuck off to some other show's wiki and try and add completely irellevant, contrary shit while banning friends of the show for simple disagreements. See how long you stay on staff there.
659
660It's sad that you're still here, Gubra. Honestly. Straight up fucking sad. Take the butthurt brigade elsewhere and create a pro-life anti-dP wiki. I'm sure it'll blow the fuck up, man. Failing that, stop being fucking pitiful and leave with the tiny shred of dignity you might keep in doing so.
66100:47, February 29, 2016
662 The Door Handler
663 
664The Door Handler 
665It's funny seeing someone calling someone else edgy when they themselves can't go a paragraph without saying the word "fuck".
66600:50, February 29, 2016
667 Gubra Lagima
668 
669Gubra Lagima 
670reply to #76
671PaulsEgo wrote:
672Gubra, you admitted to me privately over a month ago that you no longer watch, enjoy, or care about the show. Given that fact, what relevant edits / content could you possibly adding to a wiki ABOUT THE FUCKING SHOW.
673Your edgy, unfunny, irrelevant comments here highlight this problem, and show you for what you are: a butthurt, whiney faggot who wont just leave because the negative attention you get here is better than the zero attention you'd garner elsewhere.
674
675Fuck off to some other show's wiki and try and add completely irellevant, contrary shit while banning friends of the show for simple disagreements. See how long you stay on staff there.
676
677It's sad that you're still here, Gubra. Honestly. Straight up fucking sad. Take the butthurt brigade elsewhere and create a pro-life anti-dP wiki. I'm sure it'll blow the fuck up, man. Failing that, stop being fucking pitiful and leave with the tiny shred of dignity you might keep in doing so.
678You got me Paul. 100% accurate commentary on my life. Now, all you have to do is drive across Phoenix in an hour and I will leave the wiki voluntarily.
67900:51, February 29, 2016
680 The Gerudo Dragon
6811 Kudos	 
682The Gerudo Dragon 
683All talk and no substance as per the usual. What a fucking charade. No need to address what was actually said, simply bullshit around it and deem yourself on top. Sickening.
68400:59, February 29, 2016
685 SwordofStorms
686 
687SwordofStorms 
688reply to #78
689Gubra Lagima wrote:
690PaulsEgo wrote:
691Gubra, you admitted to me privately over a month ago that you no longer watch, enjoy, or care about the show. Given that fact, what relevant edits / content could you possibly adding to a wiki ABOUT THE FUCKING SHOW.
692Your edgy, unfunny, irrelevant comments here highlight this problem, and show you for what you are: a butthurt, whiney faggot who wont just leave because the negative attention you get here is better than the zero attention you'd garner elsewhere.
693
694Fuck off to some other show's wiki and try and add completely irellevant, contrary shit while banning friends of the show for simple disagreements. See how long you stay on staff there.
695
696It's sad that you're still here, Gubra. Honestly. Straight up fucking sad. Take the butthurt brigade elsewhere and create a pro-life anti-dP wiki. I'm sure it'll blow the fuck up, man. Failing that, stop being fucking pitiful and leave with the tiny shred of dignity you might keep in doing so.
697You got me Paul. 100% accurate commentary on my life. Now, all you have to do is drive across Phoenix in an hour and I will leave the wiki voluntarily.
698https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tWC5qtfby4
69901:05, February 29, 2016
700 PaulsEgo
701 
702PaulsEgo 
703reply to #78
704Gubra Lagima wrote:
705You got me Paul. 100% accurate commentary on my life. 
706Trust me. I'm aware. I just re-read our little discourse via twitter DM. I'm dead on balls correct about you. Months later and you're STILL here? Still actively shitting up a wiki you don't give a fuck about? Still weeping openly in the throes of your persecution complex?
707
708It must suck to be reduced to trying to force memes in your own "should this guy be fired" thread. What a sad spot to be in. Unable to answer critique, left with nothing but unfunny, inside jokes between your one and only friend...
709
710This is a hell of a job interview you're putting on here, Gubs. Can we promote this guy ASAP? What a fabulous candidate for admin. Hates the show, is observably dumb, is unfunny, is desperate for attention of any kind...man, you're almost TOO good for this position.
711
712INB4 "another "drive across Phoenix" zinger.
71301:07, February 29, 2016
714 The Door Handler
715 
716The Door Handler 
717"Unable to answer critique, left with nothing but unfunny, inside jokes between your one and only friend..."
718
719>Continues to make the same Brett Keane "Situation" and "Individual" jokes for the past 50 or so episodes.
72001:12, February 29, 2016
721 Gubra Lagima
722 
723Gubra Lagima 
724If the ever-so-eloquent Paul thinks that I'm an 'edgy faggot loser,' that's fine. It's ironic, considering DP's brand of humor, but fine. You can't point to any rules that I've broken, because I haven't broken any. I, however, can point to any number of rules that you and several other staff members have broken. I honestly don't want to get the wiki deleted, so I won't post any of my evidence unless I have to. However, if my account is threatened with a permaban or deletion, I'll do what I have to.
725
726Paul, you clearly don't know the entire story, and I'm 100% sure that you won't listen to anything I have to say, so I'll keep it short. I was not the person who wrote the 'evil pro-life propaganda' on the abortion page. I have not banned anyone because they disagree with me. I banned one person for less than an hour, but it was because he was removing edits I made and I wanted to talk to him about it. If he simply would have disagreed with me instead of covering up my edits, I wouldn't have taken any action against him.
727
728None of the staff have pointed to a single rule I have broken. If being hated by Paul makes me banworthy in the eyes of Wikia, that's a conversation we can have. Until then, I'm going to need concrete evidence that I did anything wrong before I leave the wiki. <3
72901:15, February 29, 2016
730 Gubra Lagima
731 
732Gubra Lagima 
733reply to #81
734PaulsEgo wrote:
735Gubra Lagima wrote:
736You got me Paul. 100% accurate commentary on my life. 
737Trust me. I'm aware. I just re-read our little discourse via twitter DM. I'm dead on balls correct about you. Months later and you're STILL here? Still actively shitting up a wiki you don't give a fuck about? Still weeping openly in the throes of your persecution complex?
738It must suck to be reduced to trying to force memes in your own "should this guy be fired" thread. What a sad spot to be in. Unable to answer critique, left with nothing but unfunny, inside jokes between your one and only friend...
739
740This is a hell of a job interview you're putting on here, Gubs. Can we promote this guy ASAP? What a fabulous candidate for admin. Hates the show, is observably dumb, is unfunny, is desperate for attention of any kind...man, you're almost TOO good for this position.
741
742INB4 "another "drive across Phoenix" zinger.
743I'm not dumb. My grandma worked in a volcano factory for 75 years. Check your language policing tbh fam
74401:17, February 29, 2016
745 SwordofStorms
746 
747SwordofStorms 
748reply to #83
749Gubra Lagima wrote:
750If the ever-so-eloquent Paul thinks that I'm an 'edgy faggot loser,' that's fine. It's ironic, considering DP's brand of humor, but fine. You can't point to any rules that I've broken, because I haven't broken any. I, however, can point to any number of rules that you and several other staff members have broken. I honestly don't want to get the wiki deleted, so I won't post any of my evidence unless I have to. However, if my account is threatened with a permaban or deletion, I'll do what I have to.
751Paul, you clearly don't know the entire story, and I'm 100% sure that you won't listen to anything I have to say, so I'll keep it short. I was not the person who wrote the 'evil pro-life propaganda' on the abortion page. I have not banned anyone because they disagree with me. I banned one person for less than an hour, but it was because he was removing edits I made and I wanted to talk to him about it. If he simply would have disagreed with me instead of covering up my edits, I wouldn't have taken any action against him.
752
753None of the staff have pointed to a single rule I have broken. If being hated by Paul makes me banworthy in the eyes of Wikia, that's a conversation we can have. Until then, I'm going to need concrete evidence that I did anything wrong before I leave the wiki. <3
754You may not have broken any of wikia's rules per say, but you certainly have broken the very rules you have set up for this wiki . You have at the very least doc dropped me, unwittingly or not, it does not matter. I just reccommend you leave before you embaress yourself further. Before we take to other measures.
755^505EC594FDD7C9F6B8E040C482731935E901CF2378C09C4E51^pimgpsh fullsize distr
756Edited by SwordofStorms	01:23, February 29, 2016
757 Gubra Lagima
758 
759Gubra Lagima 
760Bryan, I've explained the "doxing" situation several dozen times by now. Please read my past explanations and tell my why they are wrong, or drop it.
76101:25, February 29, 2016
762 SwordofStorms
763 
764SwordofStorms 
765reply to #86
766Gubra Lagima wrote:
767Bryan, I've explained the "doxing" situation several dozen times by now. Please read my past explanations and tell my why they are wrong, or drop it.
768nigga that's why I said doc dropping. There's a difference. 
76901:28, February 29, 2016
770 Gubra Lagima
771 
772Gubra Lagima 
773reply to #87
774SwordofStorms wrote:
775Gubra Lagima wrote:
776Bryan, I've explained the "doxing" situation several dozen times by now. Please read my past explanations and tell my why they are wrong, or drop it.
777nigga that's why I said doc dropping. There's a difference. 
778I made a joking tweet that included your last name, it was only seen by people who already knew your last name, and I deleted it as soon as I saw it made you upset. This is your best evidence that I should be banned from the wiki?
779Edited by Gubra Lagima	01:31, February 29, 2016
780 SwordofStorms
781 
782SwordofStorms 
783reply to #88
784Gubra Lagima wrote:
785SwordofStorms wrote:
786Gubra Lagima wrote:
787Bryan, I've explained the "doxing" situation several dozen times by now. Please read my past explanations and tell my why they are wrong, or drop it.
788nigga that's why I said doc dropping. There's a difference. 
789I made a joking tweet that included your last name, it was only seen by people who already knew your last name, and I deleted it as soon as I saw it made you upset. This is your best evidence that I should be banned from the wiki?
790a) Didn't know you deleted it
791
792b) you still posted it on the wiki
793
794c) I don't care anymore, like I said, just saying that was a technical violation of the wiki rules.
795Edited by SwordofStorms	01:36, February 29, 2016
796 SwordofStorms
797 
798SwordofStorms 
799Besides, that's not why I want you bannned. I want you banned because you're a fucking dick. The only reason you're not banned yet is because wikia's retarded and won't let the founder demote bureaucrats.
80001:37, February 29, 2016
801 FalseShepherd
8021 Kudos	 
803FalseShepherd 
804Ask yourself this question Gubra. What are you doing here?
805
806
807
808
809What are you doing really? You don't care about DP, so why remain?
810
811
812
813
814You are wasting your time. Go buy some ice cream, go get laid, go sDeadpool and quite worrying about the wiki
815
816I pose the same question to everyone else who is anti-dp
81701:38, February 29, 2016
818 Gubra Lagima
819 
820Gubra Lagima 
821You can call me a "dick," a "faggot," a "loser," and anything else. It does not change my views toward the wiki. I enjoy making constructive edits, and your feelings toward me are irrelevant.
822
823False, you may notice that the pages that have caused all of this upheaval are related to politics, not DP. I enjoy editing those pages, and I don't view it as a waste of time. I don't "worry" about the wiki, but you all seem to do a whole lot of worrying about me and my personal life.
824
825I'm not anti-DP. I used to enjoy the show, and now I don't. Every time I've spoken with a fan of the show since I stopped watching, I have been met with hostility. Every time I have ever spoken with Paul, he's called me a faggot and a loser and made hilarious claims about my personal life. While I think you're all quite rude, I don't think I'm being persecuted as Paul claims, I don't wish any of you any ill-will, I'm happy that the wiki and show are successful, and I'd like to be able to make edits to pages if I want to do so. This is a very simple situation that you're all blowing out of proportion.
82601:46, February 29, 2016
827 SwordofStorms
828 
829SwordofStorms 
830reply to #92
831Gubra Lagima wrote:
832You can call me a "dick," a "faggot," a "loser," and anything else. It does not change my views toward the wiki. I enjoy making constructive edits, and your feelings toward me are irrelevant.
833False, you may notice that the pages that have caused all of this upheaval are related to politics, not DP. I enjoy editing those pages, and I don't view it as a waste of time. I don't "worry" about the wiki, but you all seem to do a whole lot of worrying about me and my personal life.
834
835I'm not anti-DP. I used to enjoy the show, and now I don't. Every time I've spoken with a fan of the show since I stopped watching, I have been met with hostility. Every time I have ever spoken with Paul, he's called me a faggot and a loser and made hilarious claims about my personal life. While I think you're all quite rude, I don't think I'm being persecuted as Paul claims, I don't wish any of you any ill-will, I'm happy that the wiki and show are successful, and I'd like to be able to make edits to pages if I want to do so. This is a very simple situation that you're all blowing out of proportion.
836This is the most disingenuous shit I've ever read. You don't want to make good edits. You want to watch the wiki burn. We all know that. Stop pretending. Besides, if EVERY PERSON in a fan base acts hostile, maybe you need to take a good  hard look at yourself and wonder what you're doing.
83701:56, February 29, 2016
838 PaulsEgo
8391 Kudos	 
840PaulsEgo 
841reply to #83
842Paul, you clearly don't know the entire story, and I'm 100% sure that you won't listen to anything I have to say, so I'll keep it short. I was not the person who wrote the 'evil pro-life propaganda' on the abortion page. I have not banned anyone because they disagree with me. I banned one person for less than an hour, but it was because he was removing edits I made and I wanted to talk to him about it. If he simply would have disagreed with me instead of covering up my edits, I wouldn't have taken any action against him.
843
844
845So you didn't ban Phere for literally nothing? Or did you forget to mention that?
846
847If you are not responible for the out of context pro-life bullshit, do you support the banning or removal of admin powers for those doing it? Are you, as a site Admin actively reversing the pro-life edits and deleting off topic pages? 
848
849Do you watch and enjoy the show? If so, why did you tell me otherwise? If not, what the fuck are you still doing here months later, other than fucking with a wiki you don't care about?
850
851I'm listening, so long as you're talking and not jerking off your little buddy with inside mems.
85201:57, February 29, 2016
853 The Door Handler
854 
855The Door Handler 
856Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
85701:57, February 29, 2016
858 FalseShepherd
859 
860FalseShepherd 
861Gubra 20160228 205428
862Quality edits you say?
863
864
865
866Does reverting perfectly justified edits count?
86701:59, February 29, 2016
868 The Door Handler
869 
870The Door Handler 
871"not jerking off your little buddy with inside mems"
872
873I learned from watching you on DP hun XOXOXO.
87401:59, February 29, 2016
875 SwordofStorms
876 
877SwordofStorms 
878reply to #95
879The Door Handler wrote:
880Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
881The proof is self-evident in his actions.
88202:00, February 29, 2016
883 Gubra Lagima
884 
885Gubra Lagima 
886Nobody had a single problem with my edit quality until I became right-leaning. It's entirely possible that my editing skills have dropped precipitously since that time, but somehow I doubt it.
887
888I don't want to watch the wiki burn. I care less about maximizing its popularity than Gerudo does, but I think it would suck if the wiki was deleted or left barren.
889
890"If EVERY Jehovah's Witness acts hostile toward you because you're an atheist, maybe you need to take a good hard look at yourself and wonder what you're doing wrong." - Bryan, 2016.
89102:00, February 29, 2016
892 Gubra Lagima
893 
894Gubra Lagima 
895reply to #96
896FalseShepherd wrote:
897Gubra 20160228 205428
898Quality edits you say?
899
900
901Does reverting perfectly justified edits count?
902I was protecting my edits from other people who were removing them. Once again, I have addressed this countless times.
90302:01, February 29, 2016
904 The Door Handler
905 
906The Door Handler 
907reply to #98
908SwordofStorms wrote:
909The Door Handler wrote:
910Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
911The proof is self-evident in his actions.
912Wow. Thanks for solving the fucking puzzle.
913
914"Show us proof that Allah exists"
915
916"The proof is self-evident in nature"
91702:02, February 29, 2016
918 Stevoawesome
919 
920Stevoawesome 
921reply to #100
922Gubra Lagima wrote:
923FalseShepherd wrote:
924Gubra 20160228 205428
925Quality edits you say?
926
927Does reverting perfectly justified edits count?
928I was protecting my edits from other people who were removing them. Once again, I have addressed this countless times.
929Well they were protecting their edits from what you were putting in.
93002:03, February 29, 2016
931 FalseShepherd
932 
933FalseShepherd 
934reply to #95
935The Door Handler wrote:
936Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
937He doesn't. Not unless you count transforming the wiki in his vastly unpopular and non-dp image
93802:03, February 29, 2016
939 SwordofStorms
940 
941SwordofStorms 
942reply to #99
943Gubra Lagima wrote:
944"If EVERY Jehovah's Witness acts hostile toward you because you're an atheist, maybe you need to take a good hard look at yourself and wonder what you're doing wrong." - Bryan, 2016.
945Yeah, I actually agree with that. Some Jehova's Witnesses I'm fairly certain would NOT be hostile towards atheists, so if all are hostile to you then it probably is something you're doing.
94602:03, February 29, 2016
947 Gubra Lagima
948 
949Gubra Lagima 
950reply to #94
951PaulsEgo wrote:
952Paul, you clearly don't know the entire story, and I'm 100% sure that you won't listen to anything I have to say, so I'll keep it short. I was not the person who wrote the 'evil pro-life propaganda' on the abortion page. I have not banned anyone because they disagree with me. I banned one person for less than an hour, but it was because he was removing edits I made and I wanted to talk to him about it. If he simply would have disagreed with me instead of covering up my edits, I wouldn't have taken any action against him.
953
954
955So you didn't ban Phere for literally nothing? Or did you forget to mention that?
956
957If you are not responible for the out of context pro-life bullshit, do you support the banning or removal of admin powers for those doing it? Are you, as a site Admin actively reversing the pro-life edits and deleting off topic pages? 
958
959Do you watch and enjoy the show? If so, why did you tell me otherwise? If not, what the fuck are you still doing here months later, other than fucking with a wiki you don't care about?
960
961I'm listening, so long as you're talking and not jerking off your little buddy with inside mems.
962The Phere thing is 100% unrelated. I had support from a majority of the staff when I did it, and I explained to you privately why it was done.
963
964I think that expressing a different opinion is not a valid reason to be banned. It's that simple. If everyone is really so sore about a pro-life view being expressed, maybe that page can be reverted and you all can stop trying to get me banned? I would be happy with that solution.
965
966I do not watch the show, as I have already stated. I do not edit DP-related pages, only political/religious/misc. pages. Like I said, I wish you all well and hope the show continues to be successful. I don't enjoy it personally, but I would never force my apathy toward the show upon anyone else.
96702:06, February 29, 2016
968 FalseShepherd
9691 Kudos	 
970FalseShepherd 
971reply to #100
972Gubra Lagima wrote:
973FalseShepherd wrote:
974Gubra 20160228 205428
975Quality edits you say?
976
977Does reverting perfectly justified edits count?
978I was protecting my edits from other people who were removing them. Once again, I have addressed this countless times.
979Protecting is one thing. But you don't see me reverting every edit someone other than myself makes to the Kaceytron page.
980
981You are constantly undoing everyone else's edits in order to keep to your right wing bias. Youre not being open-minded or objective. You're being Conservapedia
98202:07, February 29, 2016
983 The Door Handler
984 
985The Door Handler 
986reply to #103
987FalseShepherd wrote:
988The Door Handler wrote:
989Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
990He doesn't. Not unless you count transforming the wiki in his vastly unpopular and non-dp image
991In total, he has added his political views to roughly around 7 pages or less out of 800. 
992
993He hasn't changed the CSS, people are free to make pages.
994
995How has this transformed the wiki?
99602:07, February 29, 2016
997 Gubra Lagima
998 
999Gubra Lagima 
1000reply to #102
1001Stevoawesome wrote:
1002Gubra Lagima wrote:
1003FalseShepherd wrote:
1004Gubra 20160228 205428
1005Quality edits you say?
1006
1007Does reverting perfectly justified edits count?
1008I was protecting my edits from other people who were removing them. Once again, I have addressed this countless times.
1009Well they were protecting their edits from what you were putting in.
1010Pages get overhauled all the time. I wasn't filling those pages with nonsense or spam, I was just changing wording, adding things, etc. If you want to get into problems you have with each individual edit, I will hear you out. However, I'm going to have to ask you to put your pitchforks down first.
101102:09, February 29, 2016
1012 PaulsEgo
1013 
1014PaulsEgo 
1015reply to #99
1016Gubra Lagima wrote:
1017Nobody had a single problem with my edit quality until I became right-leaning. It's entirely possible that my editing skills have dropped precipitously since that time, but somehow I doubt it.
1018I don't want to watch the wiki burn. I care less about maximizing its popularity than Gerudo does, but I think it would suck if the wiki was deleted or left barren.
1019
1020"If EVERY Jehovah's Witness acts hostile toward you because you're an atheist, maybe you need to take a good hard look at yourself and wonder what you're doing wrong." - Bryan, 2016.
1021Didn't answer a single question.
1022
1023Do you actively police the board for off-topic shit, like, for example a pro-life page on a wiki about a show filled with pro choice guys?
1024
1025Do you support the banning / removal of admin powers for people who routinely post and re-post off topic shit?
1026
1027Do you still watch and enjoy the show? If so, what changed since we talked privately? Would you like me to send you a link to that conversation privately so you can brush up on where you actually stand when you're not meme-ing it up in public? 
1028
1029Did you or did you not ban BeyondPhere for silly, insignificant personal reasons?
1030
1031Once again, I'm listening.
103202:09, February 29, 2016
1033 FalseShepherd
1034 
1035FalseShepherd 
1036reply to #107
1037The Door Handler wrote:
1038FalseShepherd wrote:
1039The Door Handler wrote:
1040Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
1041He doesn't. Not unless you count transforming the wiki in his vastly unpopular and non-dp image
1042In total, he has added his political views to roughly around 7 pages or less out of 800. 
1043He hasn't changed the CSS, people are free to make pages.
1044
1045How has this transformed the wiki?
1046Transforming can be as small as seven pages ormas big as 10,000 pages.
1047
1048There may be a difference in scale, but there is no difference in what he is doing
104902:10, February 29, 2016
1050This reply has been removed
1051This reply has been removed
1052 SwordofStorms
1053 
1054SwordofStorms 
1055reply to #101
1056The Door Handler wrote:
1057SwordofStorms wrote:
1058The Door Handler wrote:
1059Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
1060The proof is self-evident in his actions.
1061Wow. Thanks for solving the fucking puzzle.
1062"Show us proof that Allah exists"
1063
1064"The proof is self-evident in nature"
1065For one thing, he's costing us traffic. 
1066
1067https://ask.fm/PaulsEgo/answers/134832151303
106802:13, February 29, 2016
1069 Gubra Lagima
1070 
1071Gubra Lagima 
1072reply to #109
1073PaulsEgo wrote:
1074Gubra Lagima wrote:
1075Nobody had a single problem with my edit quality until I became right-leaning. It's entirely possible that my editing skills have dropped precipitously since that time, but somehow I doubt it.
1076I don't want to watch the wiki burn. I care less about maximizing its popularity than Gerudo does, but I think it would suck if the wiki was deleted or left barren.
1077
1078"If EVERY Jehovah's Witness acts hostile toward you because you're an atheist, maybe you need to take a good hard look at yourself and wonder what you're doing wrong." - Bryan, 2016.
1079Didn't answer a single question.
1080Do you actively police the board for off-topic shit, like, for example a pro-life page on a wiki about a show filled with pro choice guys?
1081
1082Do you support the banning / removal of admin powers for people who routinely post and re-post off topic shit?
1083
1084Do you still watch and enjoy the show? If so, what changed since we talked privately? Would you like me to send you a link to that conversation privately so you can brush up on where you actually stand when you're not meme-ing it up in public? 
1085
1086Did you or did you not ban BeyondPhere for silly, insignificant personal reasons?
1087
1088Once again, I'm listening.
1089I don't police anything on the wiki. I don't care what viewpoints are expressed, as long as the grammar and writing are decent.
1090
1091There are all kinds of topics discussed on the wiki. The Hitler page isn't related to DP, but I think it should stay. Same goes for lots of other pages. If someone is posting spam or something on pages, I think they should be talked to, and then banned if they keep spamming.
1092
1093I have said at least twice in this thread that I don't watch the show, which is why I only edit pages that aren't expressly related to DP. I still wish you guys the best, despite not enjoying your podcast anymore.
1094
1095I banned BeyondPhere with the consent of a majority of the staff, and for reasons that I expressed to you in private. I already answered this question above.
109602:14, February 29, 2016
1097 Gubra Lagima
1098 
1099Gubra Lagima 
1100reply to #113
1101SwordofStorms wrote:
1102The Door Handler wrote:
1103SwordofStorms wrote:
1104The Door Handler wrote:
1105Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
1106The proof is self-evident in his actions.
1107Wow. Thanks for solving the fucking puzzle.
1108"Show us proof that Allah exists"
1109
1110"The proof is self-evident in nature"
1111For one thing, he's costing us traffic. 
1112https://ask.fm/PaulsEgo/answers/134832151303
1113We have no idea who wrote that. It could've been one of you for all I know. Furthermore, you have no evidence that any edit I made has led to a decrease in traffic.
1114
1115Once again, if you want to get into each individual edit I made and why you have a problem with them, I would be happy to discuss it with all of you.
111602:16, February 29, 2016
1117 SwordofStorms
1118 
1119SwordofStorms 
1120reply to #115
1121Gubra Lagima wrote:
1122SwordofStorms wrote:
1123The Door Handler wrote:
1124SwordofStorms wrote:
1125The Door Handler wrote:
1126Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
1127The proof is self-evident in his actions.
1128Wow. Thanks for solving the fucking puzzle.
1129"Show us proof that Allah exists"
1130
1131"The proof is self-evident in nature"
1132For one thing, he's costing us traffic. 
1133https://ask.fm/PaulsEgo/answers/134832151303
1134We have no idea who wrote that. It could've been one of you for all I know. Furthermore, you have no evidence that any edit I made has led to a decrease in traffic.
1135Once again, if you want to get into each individual edit I made and why you have a problem with them, I would be happy to discuss it with all of you.
1136It's funny, because you never cared about anyone breaking wikia rules when you banned people before, but now that it's on you, it has to be against wiki rules? Remember when you banned Innosflew, Lance, and Moon Lander for "conspiring against you? Show me where in wikia rules that's not allowed. Oh wait, there is nowhere. We want to ban you for a similar reason: We don't like you. Just like you didn't like them. Just like you didn't like BeyondPhere. You don't get to change the rules now that the tables have been turned.
113702:21, February 29, 2016
1138 Sinistra Henry Hades
1139 
1140Sinistra Henry Hades 
1141reply to #54
1142Gubra Lagima wrote:
1143FalseShepherd wrote:
1144Enough with this. Can everyone who the founder wants gone leave and make their own wiki so everyone can get back to editing and we don't have to deal with unproductive atmosphere being created right now?
1145I'm not the one creating the unproductive atmosphere. I was producing content, and then my edits began to be deleted by Gerudo and his cronies. I'm standing up for the principles that the wiki was initially based upon, even if nobody else will.
1146GubraEditing
1147Here is why that statement is terrible. And for you to claim that you understand the principles of the wikia better than both the owner of the wikia, and the people whose show is what the wikia is based off of, is remarkably narcissistic.
114802:21, February 29, 2016
1149 Gubra Lagima
1150 
1151Gubra Lagima 
1152reply to #116
1153SwordofStorms wrote:
1154Gubra Lagima wrote:
1155SwordofStorms wrote:
1156The Door Handler wrote:
1157SwordofStorms wrote:
1158The Door Handler wrote:
1159Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
1160The proof is self-evident in his actions.
1161Wow. Thanks for solving the fucking puzzle.
1162"Show us proof that Allah exists"
1163
1164"The proof is self-evident in nature"
1165For one thing, he's costing us traffic. 
1166https://ask.fm/PaulsEgo/answers/134832151303
1167We have no idea who wrote that. It could've been one of you for all I know. Furthermore, you have no evidence that any edit I made has led to a decrease in traffic.
1168Once again, if you want to get into each individual edit I made and why you have a problem with them, I would be happy to discuss it with all of you.
1169It's funny, because you never cared about anyone breaking wikia rules when you banned people before, but now that it's on you, it has to be against wiki rules? Remember when you banned Innosflew, Lance, and Moon Lander for "conspiring against you? Show me where in wikia rules that's not allowed. Oh wait, there is nowhere. We want to ban you for a similar reason: We don't like you. Just like you didn't like them. Just like you didn't like BeyondPhere. You don't get to change the rules now that the tables have been turned.
1170I'm a bureaucrat, and you're asking Wikia to interfere. That changes things. The fact that I have banned people in the past does not make it justifiable to ask Wikia to ban me.
1171
1172https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque
117302:25, February 29, 2016
1174 Gubra Lagima
1175 
1176Gubra Lagima 
1177reply to #117
1178Sinistra Henry Hades wrote:
1179Gubra Lagima wrote:
1180FalseShepherd wrote:
1181Enough with this. Can everyone who the founder wants gone leave and make their own wiki so everyone can get back to editing and we don't have to deal with unproductive atmosphere being created right now?
1182I'm not the one creating the unproductive atmosphere. I was producing content, and then my edits began to be deleted by Gerudo and his cronies. I'm standing up for the principles that the wiki was initially based upon, even if nobody else will.
1183GubraEditing
1184Here is why that statement is terrible. And for you to claim that you understand the principles of the wikia better than both the owner of the wikia, and the people whose show is what the wikia is based off of, is remarkably narcissistic.
1185Like I have said for the third time now, we can discuss all of the edits one-by-one. It's impossible for me to succinctly justify every action I have done in the past 3 days when I'm being replied to faster than I can respond by people posting all kinds of general statements about my actions. We can discuss every edit I've done, and I will agree or disagree with what you say on a case-by-case basis.
118602:28, February 29, 2016
1187 PaulsEgo
1188 
1189PaulsEgo 
1190reply to #114
1191I don't police anything on the wiki. 
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196I have said at least twice in this thread that I don't watch the show, which is why I only edit pages that aren't expressly related to DP. I still wish you guys the best, despite not enjoying your podcast anymore.
1197
1198I banned BeyondPhere with the consent of a majority of the staff, and for reasons that I expressed to you in private. I already answered this question above.
1199So, you finally answer and, surprisingly answer your own question in the process. What rules have you broken? Why should you be removed as admin? Look above.
1200
1201You don't police anything on the wiki? Then why the fuck are you an Admin on the wiki? Couldn't you post in "non-dP-related" shit as an average user? Why does a guy who doesn't police anything, doesn't monitor anything or take action on anything need admin powers?
1202
1203You don't watch the show? What the fuck are you doing here, then? Would a wiki about microbiology keep an Admin that stated openly that he didn't give a fuck about the subject and would not police the wiki for off-topic content - in fact, all he would do is add to off topic content? 
1204
1205Think about that for a second, Gubra. That's you. You're the guy on the My Little Pony Wiki who doesn't watch the show anymore and only contributes via edits to wholly off-topic pages and the occasional banning. Who. The. Fuck. in their right mind would keep a guy like that on staff? You couldn't keep a fucking mop job at McDonalds with that fucking resume, Gubra.
1206
1207Not to mention that the reason you blocked BeyondPhere which you shared with me privately was UTTER fucking horseshit that NOBODY - on the show, friend of the show, fan of the show or otherwise would EVER agree was needed or even warranted consideration. Why would a guy who "doesn't watch the show" ever have fucking CAUSE to ban a friend of the show from the wiki.
1208
1209It's absurd, Gubra. And yes, it's straight up fucking sad.
1210Edited by PaulsEgo	02:35, February 29, 2016
1211 SwordofStorms
1212 
1213SwordofStorms 
1214reply to #118
1215Gubra Lagima wrote:
1216SwordofStorms wrote:
1217Gubra Lagima wrote:
1218SwordofStorms wrote:
1219The Door Handler wrote:
1220SwordofStorms wrote:
1221The Door Handler wrote:
1222Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
1223The proof is self-evident in his actions.
1224Wow. Thanks for solving the fucking puzzle.
1225"Show us proof that Allah exists"
1226
1227"The proof is self-evident in nature"
1228For one thing, he's costing us traffic. 
1229https://ask.fm/PaulsEgo/answers/134832151303
1230We have no idea who wrote that. It could've been one of you for all I know. Furthermore, you have no evidence that any edit I made has led to a decrease in traffic.
1231Once again, if you want to get into each individual edit I made and why you have a problem with them, I would be happy to discuss it with all of you.
1232It's funny, because you never cared about anyone breaking wikia rules when you banned people before, but now that it's on you, it has to be against wiki rules? Remember when you banned Innosflew, Lance, and Moon Lander for "conspiring against you? Show me where in wikia rules that's not allowed. Oh wait, there is nowhere. We want to ban you for a similar reason: We don't like you. Just like you didn't like them. Just like you didn't like BeyondPhere. You don't get to change the rules now that the tables have been turned.
1233I'm a bureaucrat, and you're asking Wikia to interfere. That changes things. The fact that I have banned people in the past does not make it justifiable to ask Wikia to ban me.
1234https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque
1235Nigga the fact that you're bureaucrat is the only reason we have to do this, and you're not even supposed to be. In fact, you were supposed to have deleted your wiki account months ago like you said you were going to.
123602:35, February 29, 2016
1237 Gubra Lagima
1238 
1239Gubra Lagima 
1240reply to #120
1241PaulsEgo wrote:
1242I don't police anything on the wiki. 
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247I have said at least twice in this thread that I don't watch the show, which is why I only edit pages that aren't expressly related to DP. I still wish you guys the best, despite not enjoying your podcast anymore.
1248
1249I banned BeyondPhere with the consent of a majority of the staff, and for reasons that I expressed to you in private. I already answered this question above.
1250So, you finally answer and, surprisingly answer your own question in the process. What rules have you broken? Why should you be removed as admin? Look above.
1251You don't police anything on the wiki? Then why the fuck are you an Admin on the wiki? Couldn't you post in "non-dP-related" shit as an average user? Why does a guy who doesn't police anything, doesn't monitor anything or take action on anything need admin powers?
1252
1253You don't watch the show? What the fuck are you doing here, then? Would a wiki about microbiology keep an Admin that stated openly that he didn't give a fuck about the subject and would not police the wiki for off-topic content - in fact, all he would do is add to off topic content? 
1254
1255Think about that for a second, Gubra. That's you. Your the guy on the My Little Pony Wiki who doesn't watch the show anymore and only contributes via edits to wholly off-topic pages and the occasional banning. Who. The. Fuck. in their right mind would keep a guy like that on staff? You couldn't keep a fucking mop job at McDonalds with that fucking resumee, Gubra.
1256
1257Not to mention that the reason you blocked BeyondPhere which you shared with me privately was UTTER fucking horseshit that NOBODY - on the show, friend of the show, fan of the show or otherwise would EVER agree was needed or even warranted consideration. Why would a guy who "doesn't watch the show" ever have fucking CAUSE to ban a friend of the show from the wiki.
1258
1259It's absurd, Gubra. And yes, it's straight up fucking sad.
1260I'm an admin because I was promoted previously. I don't want to demote myself because I would almost certainly be banned by someone simply because they don't like me. I'm sure you can understand why I don't want that to happen. Agreeing to police the wiki is not a requirement for adminship. If I saw someone vandalizing the wiki, I would ban them and remove the vandalism. I do not consider this policing, however. It boils down to semantics.
1261
1262There is a lot on the wiki that has little or nothing to do with DP. I enjoy editing those pages. I am not going to edit DP-related pages in the future, with the exception of fixing grammar mistakes if I happen to see them. I have said this multiple times.
1263
1264This is not a profession. Even if it was, your argument does not hold water. To use your McDonald's example, what you're saying is the equivalent of "McDonald's sells burgers and fries. It is their main purpose. Therefore, if all an employee does is refill the soda machine and clean the tables, then they should not be working at McDonald's, because they are not making burgers and fries." Chronicling DP is the main purpose of the wiki, but that is not the only thing that happens here. I like to improve pages, like I did with the KKK page today. Of course this isn't the main purpose of the wiki, but what's the harm in me doing it?
1265
1266In hindsight, I agree with you on the BeyondPhere issue. However, as I have said multiple times on this thread, I did it with the support of a majority of the staff at the time. We were being petty. We're human. That doesn't mean I should be banned.
126702:44, February 29, 2016
1268 Gubra Lagima
1269 
1270Gubra Lagima 
1271reply to #121
1272SwordofStorms wrote:
1273Gubra Lagima wrote:
1274SwordofStorms wrote:
1275Gubra Lagima wrote:
1276SwordofStorms wrote:
1277The Door Handler wrote:
1278SwordofStorms wrote:
1279The Door Handler wrote:
1280Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
1281The proof is self-evident in his actions.
1282Wow. Thanks for solving the fucking puzzle.
1283"Show us proof that Allah exists"
1284
1285"The proof is self-evident in nature"
1286For one thing, he's costing us traffic. 
1287https://ask.fm/PaulsEgo/answers/134832151303
1288We have no idea who wrote that. It could've been one of you for all I know. Furthermore, you have no evidence that any edit I made has led to a decrease in traffic.
1289Once again, if you want to get into each individual edit I made and why you have a problem with them, I would be happy to discuss it with all of you.
1290It's funny, because you never cared about anyone breaking wikia rules when you banned people before, but now that it's on you, it has to be against wiki rules? Remember when you banned Innosflew, Lance, and Moon Lander for "conspiring against you? Show me where in wikia rules that's not allowed. Oh wait, there is nowhere. We want to ban you for a similar reason: We don't like you. Just like you didn't like them. Just like you didn't like BeyondPhere. You don't get to change the rules now that the tables have been turned.
1291I'm a bureaucrat, and you're asking Wikia to interfere. That changes things. The fact that I have banned people in the past does not make it justifiable to ask Wikia to ban me.
1292https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque
1293Nigga the fact that you're bureaucrat is the only reason we have to do this, and you're not even supposed to be. In fact, you were supposed to have deleted your wiki account months ago like you said you were going to.
1294I marked my account for deletion, and then I edited a few other wikis and it was unmarked. I decided not to mark it for deletion again.
1295
1296I was promoted to bureaucrat by Gerudo himself several months ago. As I'm sure everyone knows by now, Wikia only demotes bureaucrats under certain circumstances. Those circumstances have not been met in this case.
1297
1298All I want to do is edit a few peripheral pages on the wiki. If you want, you can revert all of my 'right-wing' edits and we can pretend they never happened. I will not revert them back or pursue any action against the people who revert them. However, what you cannot do is have me banned by Wikia, because I have not done anything that would cause Wikia to do so. It's that simple.
129902:49, February 29, 2016
1300 SwordofStorms
1301 
1302SwordofStorms 
1303reply to #123
1304Gubra Lagima wrote:
1305SwordofStorms wrote:
1306Gubra Lagima wrote:
1307SwordofStorms wrote:
1308Gubra Lagima wrote:
1309SwordofStorms wrote:
1310The Door Handler wrote:
1311SwordofStorms wrote:
1312The Door Handler wrote:
1313Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
1314The proof is self-evident in his actions.
1315Wow. Thanks for solving the fucking puzzle.
1316"Show us proof that Allah exists"
1317
1318"The proof is self-evident in nature"
1319For one thing, he's costing us traffic. 
1320https://ask.fm/PaulsEgo/answers/134832151303
1321We have no idea who wrote that. It could've been one of you for all I know. Furthermore, you have no evidence that any edit I made has led to a decrease in traffic.
1322Once again, if you want to get into each individual edit I made and why you have a problem with them, I would be happy to discuss it with all of you.
1323It's funny, because you never cared about anyone breaking wikia rules when you banned people before, but now that it's on you, it has to be against wiki rules? Remember when you banned Innosflew, Lance, and Moon Lander for "conspiring against you? Show me where in wikia rules that's not allowed. Oh wait, there is nowhere. We want to ban you for a similar reason: We don't like you. Just like you didn't like them. Just like you didn't like BeyondPhere. You don't get to change the rules now that the tables have been turned.
1324I'm a bureaucrat, and you're asking Wikia to interfere. That changes things. The fact that I have banned people in the past does not make it justifiable to ask Wikia to ban me.
1325https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque
1326Nigga the fact that you're bureaucrat is the only reason we have to do this, and you're not even supposed to be. In fact, you were supposed to have deleted your wiki account months ago like you said you were going to.
1327I marked my account for deletion, and then I edited a few other wikis and it was unmarked. I decided not to mark it for deletion again.
1328I was promoted to bureaucrat by Gerudo himself several months ago. As I'm sure everyone knows by now, Wikia only demotes bureaucrats under certain circumstances. Those circumstances have not been met in this case.
1329
1330All I want to do is edit a few peripheral pages on the wiki. If you want, you can revert all of my 'right-wing' edits and we can pretend they never happened. I will not revert them back or pursue any action against the people who revert them. However, what you cannot do is have me banned by Wikia, because I have not done anything that would cause Wikia to do so. It's that simple.
1331We just want you to be demoted by wikia, because who is or isn't staff should be under the control of the owner, which is Fancy in this case, and he wants you demoted. We're gonna do the banning part ourselves.
133202:55, February 29, 2016
1333 PaulsEgo
13342 Kudos	 
1335PaulsEgo 
1336Why the fuck would you CARE if someone banned you? You don't watch the show, right? Don't care about what happens on it? It's like getting blocked by Steve Shives. Why the fuck do you need to maintain status in a community who you share nothing with? Nobody is coming to the wiki to read your new, ultra hot edits on the "Hitler" and "Mashed Potatoes" pages. If those things interest you, go mod the fucking Hitler wiki.
1337
1338So now you DO police the wiki. Got it. I think Gerudo can cover removing vandalism without having an Admin who doesn't give two shits about the topic of the wiki, nor keeping it readable by policing off-topic bullshit. You aren't exactly adding tons of value here.
1339
1340My analogy is closer to this: "Guy works at McDonalds. Hates the food. Tells everyone who listens how much he hates it. Doesn't do what he's asked, and instead spends his day sitting at a table in the restauraunt, in employee uniform, and writes about Hitler and Collard Greens."See how it makes sense when you don't look at it through "Gubra's +5 Prism of bullshit"?
1341
1342Yes, being petty and banning a friend of the show you admin the wiki for SHOULD be a bannable offense - ESPECIALLY given the other facts about you I mention above.
1343
1344"WHOOPS GUYS I ACCIDENTALLY GOT BUTTHURT AND REPEATEDLY BANNED A FRIEND OF THE SHOW FOR ABSOLUTELY NO DEFENSIBLE REASON!!!! I ALSO HATE THE SHOW AND ONLY EDIT THE ARTICLE ON HORTICULTURE. I CAN STAY AN ADMIN, RIGHT?"
1345
1346Who answers yes to that?
1347Edited by PaulsEgo	03:02, February 29, 2016
1348 Gubra Lagima
1349 
1350Gubra Lagima 
1351reply to #124
1352SwordofStorms wrote:
1353Gubra Lagima wrote:
1354SwordofStorms wrote:
1355Gubra Lagima wrote:
1356SwordofStorms wrote:
1357Gubra Lagima wrote:
1358SwordofStorms wrote:
1359The Door Handler wrote:
1360SwordofStorms wrote:
1361The Door Handler wrote:
1362Show us proof he wants the wiki to burn.
1363The proof is self-evident in his actions.
1364Wow. Thanks for solving the fucking puzzle.
1365"Show us proof that Allah exists"
1366
1367"The proof is self-evident in nature"
1368For one thing, he's costing us traffic. 
1369https://ask.fm/PaulsEgo/answers/134832151303
1370We have no idea who wrote that. It could've been one of you for all I know. Furthermore, you have no evidence that any edit I made has led to a decrease in traffic.
1371Once again, if you want to get into each individual edit I made and why you have a problem with them, I would be happy to discuss it with all of you.
1372It's funny, because you never cared about anyone breaking wikia rules when you banned people before, but now that it's on you, it has to be against wiki rules? Remember when you banned Innosflew, Lance, and Moon Lander for "conspiring against you? Show me where in wikia rules that's not allowed. Oh wait, there is nowhere. We want to ban you for a similar reason: We don't like you. Just like you didn't like them. Just like you didn't like BeyondPhere. You don't get to change the rules now that the tables have been turned.
1373I'm a bureaucrat, and you're asking Wikia to interfere. That changes things. The fact that I have banned people in the past does not make it justifiable to ask Wikia to ban me.
1374https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque
1375Nigga the fact that you're bureaucrat is the only reason we have to do this, and you're not even supposed to be. In fact, you were supposed to have deleted your wiki account months ago like you said you were going to.
1376I marked my account for deletion, and then I edited a few other wikis and it was unmarked. I decided not to mark it for deletion again.
1377I was promoted to bureaucrat by Gerudo himself several months ago. As I'm sure everyone knows by now, Wikia only demotes bureaucrats under certain circumstances. Those circumstances have not been met in this case.
1378
1379All I want to do is edit a few peripheral pages on the wiki. If you want, you can revert all of my 'right-wing' edits and we can pretend they never happened. I will not revert them back or pursue any action against the people who revert them. However, what you cannot do is have me banned by Wikia, because I have not done anything that would cause Wikia to do so. It's that simple.
1380We just want you to be demoted by wikia, because who is or isn't staff should be under the control of the owner, which is Fancy in this case, and he wants you demoted. We're gonna do the banning part ourselves.
1381Like I've said, Wikia will never demote me, because I haven't done anything worthy of a demotion.
1382
1383I'm extremely tired of defending myself from the exact same attacks over and over, so I'm going to take my leave. If you want to go through and roll back every edit I've made in the past few days, go ahead. I won't stop you. However, I will not demote myself or stop editing the wiki simply because you don't like me. If you have a problem with any edit I make from this point on, please tell me and we can discuss it then and there.
1384
1385(By the way, if any of you do decide to rollback all my stuff, I recommend leaving the KKK page as is, since it's pretty impartial and I improved its format quite a bit. If you want to roll it back anyway, that's cool.)
138603:02, February 29, 2016
1387 Gubra Lagima
1388 
1389Gubra Lagima 
1390reply to #125
1391PaulsEgo wrote:
1392Why the fuck would you CARE if someone banned you? You don't watch the show, right? Don't care about what happens on it? It's like getting blocked by Steve Shives. Why the fuck do you need to maintain status in a community who you share nothing with? Nobody is coming to the wiki to read your new, ultra hot edits on the "Hitler" and "Mashed Potatoes" pages. If those things interest you, go mod the fucking Hitler wiki.
1393So now you DO police the wiki. Got it. I think Gerudo can cover removing vandalism without having an Admin who doesn't give two shits about the topic of the wiki, nor keeping it readable by policing off-topic bullshit. You aren't exactly adding tons of value here.
1394
1395My analogy is closer to this: "Guy works at McDonalds. Hates the food. Tells everyone who listens how much he hates it. Doesn't do what he's asked, and instead spends his day sitting at a table in the restauraunt, in employee uniform, and writes about Hitler and Collard Greens."See how it makes sense when you don't look at it through "Gubra's +5 Prism of bullshit"?
1396
1397Yes, being petty and banning a friend of the show you admin the wiki for SHOULD be a bannable offense - ESPECIALLY given the other facts about you I mention above.
1398
1399"WHOOPS GUYS I ACCIDENTALLY GOT BUTTHURT AND REPEATEDLY BANNED A FRIEND OF THE SHOW FOR ABSOLUTELY NO DEFENSIBLE REASON!!!! I ALSO HATE THE SHOW AND ONLY EDIT THE ARTICLE ON HORTICULTURE. I CAN STAY AN ADMIN, RIGHT?"
1400
1401Who answers yes to that?
1402I don't expect anyone to read any of the pages I edit. If they do, whatever. If 0 people read them, whatever. It's all the same to me. Unlike you, there are things I do for just fun, not to further my position or boost my ego.
1403
1404Au revoir, lover boy. <3
140503:04, February 29, 2016
1406 Stevoawesome
14071 Kudos	 
1408Stevoawesome 
1409Just for the record, Wikia also needs to make sure Xyele1234 gets demoted too. You and DH promoted him to bureaucrat just so if Wikia actually does demote you two, you can just get your powers right back from Xyele.
141003:05, February 29, 2016
1411 Eggs Rank
14122 Kudos	 
1413Eggs Rank 
1414Gubra go cuck yourself.
141503:28, February 29, 2016
1416 Sinistra Henry Hades
1417 
1418Sinistra Henry Hades 
1419reply to #127
1420Gubra Lagima wrote:
1421PaulsEgo wrote:
1422Why the fuck would you CARE if someone banned you? You don't watch the show, right? Don't care about what happens on it? It's like getting blocked by Steve Shives. Why the fuck do you need to maintain status in a community who you share nothing with? Nobody is coming to the wiki to read your new, ultra hot edits on the "Hitler" and "Mashed Potatoes" pages. If those things interest you, go mod the fucking Hitler wiki.
1423So now you DO police the wiki. Got it. I think Gerudo can cover removing vandalism without having an Admin who doesn't give two shits about the topic of the wiki, nor keeping it readable by policing off-topic bullshit. You aren't exactly adding tons of value here.
1424
1425My analogy is closer to this: "Guy works at McDonalds. Hates the food. Tells everyone who listens how much he hates it. Doesn't do what he's asked, and instead spends his day sitting at a table in the restauraunt, in employee uniform, and writes about Hitler and Collard Greens."See how it makes sense when you don't look at it through "Gubra's +5 Prism of bullshit"?
1426
1427Yes, being petty and banning a friend of the show you admin the wiki for SHOULD be a bannable offense - ESPECIALLY given the other facts about you I mention above.
1428
1429"WHOOPS GUYS I ACCIDENTALLY GOT BUTTHURT AND REPEATEDLY BANNED A FRIEND OF THE SHOW FOR ABSOLUTELY NO DEFENSIBLE REASON!!!! I ALSO HATE THE SHOW AND ONLY EDIT THE ARTICLE ON HORTICULTURE. I CAN STAY AN ADMIN, RIGHT?"
1430
1431Who answers yes to that?
1432I don't expect anyone to read any of the pages I edit. If they do, whatever. If 0 people read them, whatever. It's all the same to me. Unlike you, there are things I do for just fun, not to further my position or boost my ego.
1433Au revoir, lover boy. <3
1434What you just said is obviously a lie. If you did not care if people read the pages you edit, you would not be editing this wikia. You would be writing your opinions on a wikia that agrees with you, or your own personal blog. It would also be more productive for you, as you wouldn't have to constantly undo edits to articles that you don't like. But you do care, and the fact that you have made post after post on this thread in a petty attempt to defend your edits, and your status as admin, easily proves that.
143504:05, February 29, 2016
1436 FalseShepherd
1437 
1438FalseShepherd 
1439We only want wikia to demote you and remove you your bureaucrat status. Same goes for all bureaucrats that are not staff.
1440
1441Whether or not you get banned, stay or leave of your own accord, will not have wikia involved
144210:51, February 29, 2016
1443 The Door Handler
1444 
1445The Door Handler 
1446I slightly understand where you guys are coming from.
1447
1448But don't you think we should allow people who don't care about the fanbase and haven't watched the show in months to continue editing and co-existing here through the goodness of our hearts as long as they care about editing/maintaining pages here and have made the wiki what it is today or should they be forced to leave?
144915:30, February 29, 2016
1450 SwordofStorms
14511 Kudos	 
1452SwordofStorms 
1453reply to #132
1454The Door Handler wrote:
1455I slightly understand where you guys are coming from.
1456But don't you think we should allow people who don't care about the fanbase and haven't watched the show in months to continue editing and co-existing here through the goodness of our hearts as long as they care about editing/maintaining pages here and have made the wiki what it is today or should they be forced to leave?
1457Yes, but they shouldn't be staff.
145815:33, February 29, 2016
1459 The Door Handler
1460 
1461The Door Handler 
1462I'd like to know everyone's thoughts
146315:40, February 29, 2016
1464 Gubra Lagima
1465 
1466Gubra Lagima 
1467As this thread has established, several people want me to be banned for ridiculous and shallow reasons. Eggs Rank just banned me earlier today, in fact. If I could actually trust that I could safely remain on the wiki if I demoted myself, I would consider it. However, since I can be pretty confident of the opposite, I will not.
1468
1469Also, I like the ability to edit every page, and I don't see the harm in having an additional user with ban powers, especially considering the fact that 2 spam bots have vandalized the site in the past 2 days.
1470Edited by Gubra Lagima	18:09, February 29, 2016
1471 Ducksoup
1472 
1473Ducksoup 
1474OK, I wanted to give everyone a chance to talk this out and hopefully come to a resolution for yourselves. From what I can tell, though, this conversation isn't really going anywhere. It seems as if everyone's dug in. And unfortunately, this thread is almost impossible to follow, and we can't track who voted on the other poll, so we don't know if it was a legitimate outcome. 
1475
1476If you want to vote on your leadership, here's what you need to do: create a forum post or blog that simply says "We are voting on bureaucrat rights for [user], [user], and [user]. You need to vote 'Remain' or 'Demote'."
1477
1478Responses should only say "[user]: remain" or "[user]: demote". If responses get off-topic, delete them and direct them to this thread or another thread. 
1479
1480Reply here with a link to the newly-created poll. It needs to stay up for a week before I take action, and I'll check each user to make sure they're an active member of the wiki before I make any decisions.
148120:29, February 29, 2016
1482 The Door Handler
1483 
1484The Door Handler 
1485reply to #133
1486SwordofStorms wrote:
1487The Door Handler wrote:
1488I slightly understand where you guys are coming from.
1489But don't you think we should allow people who don't care about the fanbase and haven't watched the show in months to continue editing and co-existing here through the goodness of our hearts as long as they care about editing/maintaining pages here and have made the wiki what it is today or should they be forced to leave?
1490Yes, but they shouldn't be staff.
1491This question still stands and people should say their thoughts before voting.
149220:38, February 29, 2016
1493 FalseShepherd
1494 
1495FalseShepherd 
1496reply to #136
1497Ducksoup wrote:
1498OK, I wanted to give everyone a chance to talk this out and hopefully come to a resolution for yourselves. From what I can tell, though, this conversation isn't really going anywhere. It seems as if everyone's dug in. And unfortunately, this thread is almost impossible to follow, and we can't track who voted on the other poll, so we don't know if it was a legitimate outcome. 
1499If you want to vote on your leadership, here's what you need to do: create a forum post or blog that simply says "We are voting on bureaucrat rights for [user], [user], and [user]. You need to vote 'Remain' or 'Demote'."
1500
1501Responses should only say "[user]: remain" or "[user]: demote". If responses get off-topic, delete them and direct them to this thread or another thread. 
1502
1503Reply here with a link to the newly-created poll. It needs to stay up for a week before I take action, and I'll check each user to make sure they're an active member of the wiki before I make any decisions.
1504I've been tasked with making it. So I'll link it when I finish
150520:41, February 29, 2016
1506 Gubra Lagima
1507 
1508Gubra Lagima 
1509I think that this is a very bad time to hold such a poll. The Drunken Peasants have all been told extremely biased versions of what happened, and they're planning on talking about this on the show tonight. That will inevitably lead to a massive surge in anti-conservatives visiting the wiki, and many of them are sure to vote. Perhaps it would be best to vote another time, or, as I have suggested, to rollback all of the conservative edits and allow me to remain on the wiki.
151020:42, February 29, 2016
1511 SwordofStorms
1512 
1513SwordofStorms 
1514reply to #139
1515Gubra Lagima wrote:
1516I think that this is a very bad time to hold such a poll. The Drunken Peasants have all been told extremely biased versions of what happened, and they're planning on talking about this on the show tonight. That will inevitably lead to a massive surge in anti-conservatives visiting the wiki, and many of them are sure to vote. Perhaps it would be best to vote another time, or, as I have suggested, to rollback all of the conservative edits and allow me to remain on the wiki.
1517In the video we've prepared, we made no mention of such a poll, nor your names. The poll is safe.
1518Edited by SwordofStorms	20:51, February 29, 2016
1519 The Door Handler
1520 
1521The Door Handler 
1522Thank God you've made a 100% unbiased video. You could've debated us on Skype or some shit but no. Making a video is the only way for you guys to get your precious little egos featured on DP.
152320:56, February 29, 2016
1524 SwordofStorms
1525 
1526SwordofStorms 
1527reply to #141
1528The Door Handler wrote:
1529Thank God you've made a 100% unbiased video. You could've debated us on Skype or some shit but no. Making a video is the only way for you guys to get your precious little egos featured on DP.
1530"Deal with it, fucker" - Albert Einstein
153120:58, February 29, 2016
1532 SwordofStorms
1533 
1534SwordofStorms 
1535http://drunken-peasants-podcast.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:22871
1536
1537
1538
1539Just so everyone knows, here's the poll.
154021:00, February 29, 2016
1541 The Door Handler
1542 
1543The Door Handler 
1544"Gubra and his Gub Scouts causing disruption."
1545
1546Look at all of these reasons why we should go.
1547
1548http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Mira_Laime/How_to_Deal_With_a_Bad_Bureaucrat
1549
1550Go ahead, point them out and I'll link to another staff member here that has actually broken such a rule.
155121:18, February 29, 2016
1552 SwordofStorms
1553 
1554SwordofStorms 
1555reply to #144
1556The Door Handler wrote:
1557"Gubra and his Gub Scouts causing disruption."
1558Look at all of these reasons why we should go.
1559
1560http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Mira_Laime/How_to_Deal_With_a_Bad_Bureaucrat
1561
1562Go ahead, point them out and I'll link to another staff member here that has actually broken such a rule.
1563Wikia rules are irrelivant. That's like saying "WHY ARE YOU KICKING ME OUT OF YOUR HOUSE, WHAT LAW HAVE I BROKEN?!" No. That's not how that works.
156421:21, February 29, 2016
1565 The Door Handler
1566 
1567The Door Handler 
1568I'd like everyone to know that SwordOfStorms has already attempted to skew the odds in his favour with this. As soon as the poll has been put in place he blocks the user:TheLordYourGod for "precautionary measures". This polling has already become a corrupt sham and I think that nothing short of Wikia intervention can shut this down or by the complete removal of SwordOfStorms from the wiki.
1569Imgpsh fullsize
157021:24, February 29, 2016
1571 The Door Handler
1572 
1573The Door Handler 
1574"Wikia rules are irrelavent" - SwordofStorms, 2016
157521:26, February 29, 2016
1576 SwordofStorms
1577 
1578SwordofStorms 
1579reply to #146
1580The Door Handler wrote:
1581I'd like everyone to know that SwordOfStorms has already attempted to skew the odds in his favour with this. As soon as the poll has been put in place he blocks the user:TheLordYourGod for "precautionary measures". This polling has already become a corrupt sham and I think that nothing short of Wikia intervention can shut this down or by the complete removal of SwordOfStorms from the wiki.
1582Imgpsh fullsize
1583So you can't promote him so he can unblock you. I wasn't even considering the poll when I did that. 
158421:28, February 29, 2016
1585 The Door Handler
1586 
1587The Door Handler 
15881. I never thought of doing that for a second
1589
15902. Great excuse man, great. Ban users that might impact the poll then proceed to say it's my fault.
159121:30, February 29, 2016
1592 FalseShepherd
1593 
1594FalseShepherd 
1595reply to #144
1596The Door Handler wrote:
1597"Gubra and his Gub Scouts causing disruption."
1598Look at all of these reasons why we should go.
1599
1600http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Mira_Laime/How_to_Deal_With_a_Bad_Bureaucrat
1601
1602Go ahead, point them out and I'll link to another staff member here that has actually broken such a rule.
1603https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_gJLAI23hc 
160421:30, February 29, 2016
1605 The Door Handler
1606 
1607The Door Handler 
1608The DP Wiki has proven that it doesn't abide by fairness in polling or care about the rules of Wikia.
1609
161010/10
161121:32, February 29, 2016
1612 SwordofStorms
1613 
1614SwordofStorms 
1615reply to #151
1616The Door Handler wrote:
1617The DP Wiki has proven that it doesn't abide by fairness in polling or care about the rules of Wikia.
161810/10
1619explain to me how it's not fair. If I see anyone who I don't recognize vote, I'm planning on deleting the vote, as this is a community effort. How is it not fair? also, you might as well vote too...
162021:37, February 29, 2016
1621 FalseShepherd
1622 
1623FalseShepherd 
1624reply to #146
1625The Door Handler wrote:
1626I'd like everyone to know that SwordOfStorms has already attempted to skew the odds in his favour with this. As soon as the poll has been put in place he blocks the user:TheLordYourGod for "precautionary measures". This polling has already become a corrupt sham and I think that nothing short of Wikia intervention can shut this down or by the complete removal of SwordOfStorms from the wiki.
1627Imgpsh fullsize
1628He banned LYG cuz he is inactive and you'd probably enlist him to vote for you. Ducksoup is only counting the votes of ACTIVE users.
1629
1630Plus we were gonna ban him anyway.
163121:38, February 29, 2016
1632 FalseShepherd
1633 
1634FalseShepherd 
1635reply to #151
1636The Door Handler wrote:
1637The DP Wiki has proven that it doesn't abide by fairness in polling or care about the rules of Wikia.
163810/10
1639https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_gJLAI23hc 
164021:39, February 29, 2016
1641 The Door Handler
1642 
1643The Door Handler 
1644reply to #152
1645SwordofStorms wrote:
1646The Door Handler wrote:
1647The DP Wiki has proven that it doesn't abide by fairness in polling or care about the rules of Wikia.
164810/10
1649explain to me how it's not fair. If I see anyone who I don't recognize vote, I'm planning on deleting the vote, as this is a community effort. How is it not fair? also, you might as well vote too...
1650It's not fair because
1651
1652A) Wikia's rules state that you should give a warning before banning someone.
1653
1654B) It's not fair because banning someone because they might get promoted is stupid and "maybe" getting promoted" does not break any rule.
1655
1656C) Situation individjul
1657
1658D) Why were you planning on banning him? He has not broken any freaking rule.
1659
1660E) Funny thing is I haven't contacted him in months and he would've voted for us to leave anyway.
1661
1662Now if you want I can pull up a list of other unfair,unwarranted bans you guys, as admins have done.
1663
1664Apparently taking people out before they've done anything is supported by you guys. Hail fucking Hydra.
166521:45, February 29, 2016
1666 SwordofStorms
16671 Kudos	 
1668SwordofStorms 
1669reply to #155
1670The Door Handler wrote:
1671SwordofStorms wrote:
1672The Door Handler wrote:
1673The DP Wiki has proven that it doesn't abide by fairness in polling or care about the rules of Wikia.
167410/10
1675explain to me how it's not fair. If I see anyone who I don't recognize vote, I'm planning on deleting the vote, as this is a community effort. How is it not fair? also, you might as well vote too...
1676It's not fair because
1677A) Wikia's rules state that you should give a warning before banning someone.
1678
1679B) It's not fair because banning someone because they might get promoted is stupid and "maybe" getting promoted" does not break any rule.
1680
1681C) Situation individjul
1682
1683D) Why were you planning on banning him? He has not broken any freaking rule.
1684
1685E) Funny thing is I haven't contacted him in months and he would've voted for us to leave anyway.
1686
1687Now if you want I can pull up a list of other unfair,unwarranted bans you guys, as admins have done.
1688
1689Apparently taking people out before they've done anything is supported by you guys. Hail fucking Hydra.
1690I'm planning on unbanning him once the vote is decided on. I temporarily banned him as a way to ensure that once you guys get banned you'll never get unbanned. Simple as that. Also, last I checked, he was in your group.
169121:50, February 29, 2016
1692 The Door Handler
1693 
1694The Door Handler 
1695He is not in our group. He left as soon as you did.
1696
1697And "Planning to unban" someone once the vote is over is a fucking stupid idea. Yeah, "I'll let this guy go once he has no say in this poll".
1698
1699Tan fucking fastic Sword. You're becoming the successor to Eggs Rank more and more by the second.
170023:20, February 29, 2016
1701 SwordofStorms
1702 
1703SwordofStorms 
1704reply to #157
1705Shits
1706The Door Handler wrote:
1707He is not in our group. He left as soon as you did.
1708And "Planning to unban" someone once the vote is over is a fucking stupid idea. Yeah, "I'll let this guy go once he has no say in this poll".
1709
1710Tan fucking fastic Sword. You're becoming the successor to Eggs Rank more and more by the second.
1711
171223:25, February 29, 2016
1713 FalseShepherd
1714 
1715FalseShepherd 
1716reply to #157
1717The Door Handler wrote:
1718He is not in our group. He left as soon as you did.
1719And "Planning to unban" someone once the vote is over is a fucking stupid idea. Yeah, "I'll let this guy go once he has no say in this poll".
1720
1721Tan fucking fastic Sword. You're becoming the successor to Eggs Rank more and more by the second.
1722[[1]]
172301:14, March 1, 2016
1724 Olli399
1725 
1726Olli399 
1727All this drama started as I came in and as someone who got banned for no reason on the first fucking day by Gubra. (Literally for fucking nothing) They have all, when I have spoken to them, (Gubra, HPL and all that group) have all been disgusting people to talk to.(Incase you didn't notice, I especially hate you Gubra. Fuck you.)  All it ever was.
1728
1729Me and a couple others: Normal convo
1730
1731Gubra Joined
1732
1733Oh shit :/
1734
1735Conversation dies,
1736
1737
1738
1739So please kick these cancerous and toxic people.
174001:23, March 1, 2016
1741 FalseShepherd
1742 
1743FalseShepherd 
1744reply to #160
1745Olli399 wrote:
1746All this drama started as I came in and as someone who got banned for no reason on the first fucking day by Gubra. (Literally for fucking nothing) They have all, when I have spoken to them, (Gubra, HPL and all that group) have all been disgusting people to talk to.(Incase you didn't notice, I especially hate you Gubra. Fuck you.)  All it ever was.
1747Me and a couple others: Normal convo
1748
1749Gubra Joined
1750
1751Oh shit :/
1752
1753Conversation dies,
1754
1755
1756
1757So please kick these cancerous and toxic people.
1758The most intelligent person on the wiki. You give Hawking a run for his money
175901:31, March 1, 2016
1760 FalseShepherd
1761 
1762FalseShepherd 
1763reply to #160
1764Olli399 wrote:
1765All this drama started as I came in and as someone who got banned for no reason on the first fucking day by Gubra. (Literally for fucking nothing) They have all, when I have spoken to them, (Gubra, HPL and all that group) have all been disgusting people to talk to.(Incase you didn't notice, I especially hate you Gubra. Fuck you.)  All it ever was.
1766Me and a couple others: Normal convo
1767
1768Gubra Joined
1769
1770Oh shit :/
1771
1772Conversation dies,
1773
1774
1775
1776So please kick these cancerous and toxic people.
1777Xyele is just as much of a scumbag as Gubra
177801:32, March 1, 2016
1779 Saab Pimping
1780 
1781Saab Pimping 
1782NO, demotion
178301:33, March 1, 2016
1784 FalseShepherd
1785 
1786FalseShepherd 
1787reply to #163
1788Saab Pimping wrote:
1789NO, demotion
1790Did he promote you? You must immediately demote yourself.
179101:40, March 1, 2016
1792 SwordofStorms
1793 
1794SwordofStorms 
1795reply to #164
1796FalseShepherd wrote:
1797Saab Pimping wrote:
1798NO, demotion
1799Did he promote you? You must immediately demote yourself.
1800No, he didn't false. Why don't you check next time?
180101:41, March 1, 2016
1802 Saab Pimping
1803 
1804Saab Pimping 
1805reply to #164
1806FalseShepherd wrote:
1807Saab Pimping wrote:
1808NO, demotion
1809Did he promote you? You must immediately demote yourself.
1810No
181101:52, March 1, 2016
1812 Gatack
1813 
1814Gatack 
1815No: They should be demoted by Wikia. Kick his ass out that Door Handle boy!
181604:09, March 1, 2016
1817Topics for this thread:
1818  Edit Topics
1819Recent Wiki Activity
1820
1821Janet Bloomfield
1822edited by JudgeRichter 5 days ago
1823Galen Hallcyon
1824edited by Patriarchy
1825James Rolfe
1826edited by The Demon In Me
1827AlphaOmegaSin
1828edited by The Demon In Me
1829See more >
1830Games
1831Movies
1832TV
1833Explore Wikis
1834Follow Us
1835
1836Overview